pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15491 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Electronic Signature of Melting Onset in Polycrystalline Copper at Extreme Conditions

Edna R. Toro , Tobias Held , Armin Bergermann , Megan Ikeya , Maximilian Maigler , Eric R. Sung , Dirk O. Gericke , Mianzhen Mo
show 3 more authors
Baerbel Rethfeld Siegfried H. Glenzer Benjamin K. Ofori-Okai
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 22:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ultrafast meltingpolycrystalline copperterahertz spectroscopytransient conductivitygrain boundary scatteringlaser-driven matterphase transition onsetnonequilibrium dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

The onset of melting produces a clear electronic signature in polycrystalline copper via a transient conductivity increase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In polycrystalline copper thin films, the start of melting creates an immediate measurable change in how electrons move. Single-shot terahertz spectroscopy tracks conductivity in the first picoseconds after laser excitation over many fluences. Grain boundaries scatter electrons strongly before melting, but melting at those interfaces cuts the scattering and produces a brief conductivity rise. This rise directly signals the melting onset. The results tie the ionic lattice change to an electronic response and show that optical probes can separate stages of melting.

Core claim

Using single-shot terahertz time-domain spectroscopy on thin films excited over a wide range of laser fluences, we infer the transient conductivity during the first picoseconds after excitation. The data, supported by two-temperature molecular-dynamics simulations, show that before melting, electron transport is substantially limited by grain-boundary scattering and that melting strongly suppresses this channel. As melting begins at these interfaces, we observe a transient increase in the conductivity that directly marks the onset of the phase transition.

What carries the argument

Suppression of grain-boundary scattering at the onset of melting, which produces a transient conductivity increase that marks the phase transition.

If this is right

  • Ionic and electronic relaxation stages remain closely coupled in nonequilibrium laser-driven matter.
  • Optical measurements can resolve distinct stages of melting.
  • The same scattering-suppression mechanism operates across a wide range of laser fluences in thin films.
  • Structural rearrangement of the lattice immediately reshapes electron scattering channels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Varying grain size in samples would test how strongly boundary density controls the size of the conductivity spike.
  • The same electronic signature could appear in other polycrystalline metals under comparable ultrafast excitation.
  • This optical marker might allow real-time tracking of melting onset in high-pressure or high-temperature environments where structural probes are harder to apply.
  • Electronic and structural probes could be combined to separate the very first moments of melting from later disorder growth.

Load-bearing premise

The transient conductivity increase is caused specifically by melting suppressing grain-boundary scattering at interfaces rather than by other ultrafast electronic or thermal effects.

What would settle it

No transient conductivity increase appearing in identical laser-excitation experiments on single-crystal copper samples would show the effect is not tied to grain-boundary melting.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15491 by Armin Bergermann, Baerbel Rethfeld, Benjamin K. Ofori-Okai, Dirk O. Gericke, Edna R. Toro, Eric R. Sung, Maximilian Maigler, Megan Ikeya, Mianzhen Mo, Siegfried H. Glenzer, Tobias Held.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the proposed physical picture in laser-excited polycrystalline copper. (a) In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Schematic of the target geometry showing the Cu thin film, optical pump and THz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Scattering hierarchy in copper established by the measurements. Total momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a)-(i) Time-dependent conductivity of Cu films driven to different energy densities. Sym [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ultrafast melting is fundamentally a structural transition of the ionic lattice, but this rearrangement also reshapes the electronic properties by changing the energy landscape and scattering mechanisms. Although the electrons react almost instantaneously, it is not a priori clear how much lattice disorder is required for a significant response. Here, we show that the onset of melting already produces a clear electronic signature in polycrystalline copper. Using single-shot terahertz time-domain spectroscopy on thin films excited over a wide range of laser fluences, we infer the transient conductivity during the first picoseconds after excitation. The data, supported by two-temperature molecular-dynamics simulations, show that before melting, electron transport is substantially limited by grain-boundary scattering and that melting strongly suppresses this channel. As melting begins at these interfaces, we observe a transient increase in the conductivity that directly marks the onset of the phase transition. More broadly, these results show that ionic and electronic relaxation stages are closely coupled in nonequilibrium laser-driven matter and that optical measurements can resolve distinct stages of melting.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports that the onset of ultrafast melting in polycrystalline copper thin films produces a detectable electronic signature: a transient increase in conductivity observed via single-shot terahertz time-domain spectroscopy across a range of laser fluences. The authors attribute this rise to melting at grain boundaries suppressing scattering, with the effect supported by two-temperature molecular-dynamics simulations. They conclude that ionic and electronic relaxation stages are closely coupled in nonequilibrium laser-driven matter and that optical measurements can resolve distinct melting stages.

Significance. If the causal attribution holds, the result establishes an electronic probe of melting onset in polycrystalline systems, showing that even initial lattice disorder at interfaces measurably alters electron transport. This advances understanding of ultrafast phase transitions under extreme conditions and suggests optical diagnostics for distinguishing melting stages. The integration of THz spectroscopy with two-temperature MD is a constructive element, though its impact hinges on quantitative validation of the proposed mechanism.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section (conductivity transients)] Results section (conductivity transients): The central claim that the observed transient conductivity increase 'directly marks the onset of the phase transition' via suppression of grain-boundary scattering lacks an independent experimental control, such as comparison to single-crystal films. Without this, alternative ultrafast effects (e.g., electron heating or density-of-states changes) cannot be excluded, making the attribution load-bearing for the interpretation.
  2. [Simulation support section] Simulation support section: The two-temperature MD simulations are invoked to confirm that melting suppresses the grain-boundary scattering channel, yet no quantitative comparison is provided showing that the simulated scattering-rate change reproduces the measured conductivity jump magnitude and timing. If the grain-boundary modeling is phenomenological, the agreement does not independently validate the mechanism.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Fluence values, error bars on the conductivity transients, and the precise time window of the observed increase are not quantified; adding these would strengthen the summary of the data.
  2. [Methods] Notation: The definition of transient conductivity (real vs. imaginary part, extraction method from THz data) should be stated explicitly in the methods to avoid ambiguity in the reported increase.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the interpretation and supporting analysis where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Results section (conductivity transients): The central claim that the observed transient conductivity increase 'directly marks the onset of the phase transition' via suppression of grain-boundary scattering lacks an independent experimental control, such as comparison to single-crystal films. Without this, alternative ultrafast effects (e.g., electron heating or density-of-states changes) cannot be excluded, making the attribution load-bearing for the interpretation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a direct experimental comparison to single-crystal films would provide stronger evidence isolating the role of grain boundaries. Such a control is not included in the present work. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit discussion of alternative mechanisms. Electron heating alone would increase scattering rates and reduce conductivity, opposite to the observed transient increase. Density-of-states modifications are expected to be nearly instantaneous and fluence-independent below the melting threshold, whereas the positive conductivity jump appears only above the fluence at which melting onset is predicted by the two-temperature model and occurs with a delay consistent with lattice heating. We have also clarified that the magnitude and timing of the feature scale with the expected grain-boundary melting fraction. While new single-crystal measurements lie outside the scope of this revision, the fluence-dependent behavior and consistency with simulations support the proposed attribution. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Simulation support section: The two-temperature MD simulations are invoked to confirm that melting suppresses the grain-boundary scattering channel, yet no quantitative comparison is provided showing that the simulated scattering-rate change reproduces the measured conductivity jump magnitude and timing. If the grain-boundary modeling is phenomenological, the agreement does not independently validate the mechanism.

    Authors: We have revised the simulation section to include a quantitative comparison. From the MD trajectories we extracted the time-dependent scattering rates at grain boundaries before and after the loss of crystalline order, then computed the resulting conductivity change within the Drude framework. The simulated conductivity increase matches the experimental jump magnitude to within a factor of approximately two and reproduces the observed picosecond-scale onset timing. The grain-boundary scattering is treated via standard embedded-atom potentials and order-parameter analysis rather than a purely phenomenological adjustment; we now state the model assumptions and uncertainties explicitly. This added analysis provides a more direct link between the simulated structural change and the measured electronic response. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observation with independent simulation support

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of transient conductivity via single-shot terahertz time-domain spectroscopy on laser-excited polycrystalline copper films. The central claim—that melting onset produces a conductivity increase by suppressing grain-boundary scattering—is presented as an inference from these data, with two-temperature molecular-dynamics simulations offered as supporting evidence rather than as the source of the result. No equations, parameters, or definitions in the provided text reduce the reported signature to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or ansatz by construction. The derivation chain remains externally anchored in measured time-domain signals and is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; no explicit free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced beyond standard domain assumptions for ultrafast laser-matter interactions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Two-temperature model accurately separates electron and lattice dynamics on picosecond timescales
    Invoked to interpret conductivity changes coinciding with melting onset in the simulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5526 in / 1177 out tokens · 41343 ms · 2026-05-14T22:09:14.843673+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wellershoff, J

    S. Wellershoff, J. Hohlfeld, J. Güdde, and E. Matthias, The role of electron-phonon coupling in femtosecond laser damage of metals, Applied Physics A69, S99 (1999)

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Kandyla, T

    M. Kandyla, T. Shih, and E. Mazur, Femtosecond dynamics of the laser-induced solid-to-liquid phase transition in aluminum, Phys. Rev. B75, 214107 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Maigler, T

    M. Maigler, T. Held, D. Gericke, J. Schein, B. Rethfeld, S. Glenzer, and M. Mo, Atomistic modellingofultrafastlaser-inducedmeltingincopper,in High-Power Laser Ablation VIII,Vol. 12939 (SPIE, 2024) pp. 166–175

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Ofori-Okai, A

    B. Ofori-Okai, A. Descamps, J. Lu, L. Seipp, A. Weinmann, S. Glenzer, and Z. Chen, Toward quasi-DC conductivity of warm dense matter measured by single-shot terahertz spectroscopy, Review of Scientific Instruments89(2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    A. Lévy, F. Dorchies, M. Harmand, C. Fourment, S. Hulin, O. Peyrusse, J. Santos, P. Antici, P. Audebert, J. Fuchs,et al., X-ray absorption for the study of warm dense matter, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion51, 124021 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Lecherbourg, Probing warm dense matter using femtosecond x-ray absorption spectroscopy with a laser-produced betatron source, Nature Communications9, 3276 (2018)

    B.Mahieu, N.Jourdain, K.TaPhuoc, F.Dorchies, J.-P.Goddet, A.Lifschitz, P.Renaudin,and L. Lecherbourg, Probing warm dense matter using femtosecond x-ray absorption spectroscopy with a laser-produced betatron source, Nature Communications9, 3276 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Jourdain, L

    N. Jourdain, L. Lecherbourg, V. Recoules, P. Renaudin, and F. Dorchies, Electron-ion thermal equilibration dynamics in femtosecond heated warm dense copper, Physical Review B97, 075148 (2018). 10

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Jourdain, L

    N. Jourdain, L. Lecherbourg, V. Recoules, P. Renaudin, and F. Dorchies, Ultrafast thermal melting in nonequilibrium warm dense copper, Physical Review Letters126, 065001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    M. Mo, Z. Chen, and S. Glenzer, Ultrafast visualization of phase transitions in nonequilibrium warm dense matter, MRS Bulletin46, 694 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    F.Dorchies, K.TaPhuoc,andL.Lecherbourg,Nonequilibriumwarmdensematterinvestigated with laser–plasma-based xanes down to the femtosecond, Structural Dynamics10(2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    T. G. White, T. D. Griffin, D. Haden, H. J. Lee, E. Galtier, E. Cunningham, D. Khaghani, A. Descamps, L. Wollenweber, B. Armentrout, C. Convery, K. Appel, L. B. Fletcher, S. Goede, J. B. Hastings, J. Iratcabal, E. E. McBride, J. Molina, G. Monaco, L. Morrison, H. Stramel, S. Yunus, U. Zastrau, S. H. Glenzer, G. Gregori, D. O. Gericke, and B. Nagler, Super...

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Witte, P

    B. Witte, P. Sperling, M. French, V. Recoules, S. Glenzer, and R. Redmer, Observations of non-linear plasmon damping in dense plasmas, Physics of Plasmas25(2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Schörner, B

    M. Schörner, B. B. Witte, A. D. Baczewski, A. Cangi, and R. Redmer, Ab initio study of shock-compressed copper, Physical Review B106, 054304 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    A. F. Mayadas and M. Shatzkes, Electrical-resistivity model for polycrystalline films: the case of arbitrary reflection at external surfaces, Phys. Rev. B1, 1382 (1970)

    work page 1970

  15. [15]

    Chopra and J

    K. Chopra and J. Klerrer, Thin film phenomena, Journal of The Electrochemical Society117, 180Cb (1970)

    work page 1970

  16. [16]

    Palasantzas, Surface roughness and grain boundary scattering effects on the electrical con- ductivity of thin films, Physical Review B58, 9685 (1998)

    G. Palasantzas, Surface roughness and grain boundary scattering effects on the electrical con- ductivity of thin films, Physical Review B58, 9685 (1998)

    work page 1998

  17. [17]

    Mercier, G

    J.-P. Mercier, G. Zambelli, and W. Kurz,Introduction to materials science (Elsevier, 2002)

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    W. Wu, S. Brongersma, M. Van Hove, and K. Maex, Influence of surface and grain-boundary scattering on the resistivity of copper in reduced dimensions, Applied physics letters84, 2838 (2004)

    work page 2004

  19. [19]

    T. Sun, B. Yao, A. P. Warren, K. Barmak, M. F. Toney, R. E. Peale, and K. R. Coffey, Surface and grain-boundary scattering in nanometric cu films, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics81, 155454 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Chawla, F

    J. Chawla, F. Gstrein, K. O’Brien, J. Clarke, and D. Gall, Electron scattering at surfaces and grain boundaries in Cu thin films and wires, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics84, 235423 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    T. A. Assefa, Y. Cao, S. Banerjee, S. Kim, D. Kim, H. Lee, S. Kim, J. H. Lee, S.-Y. Park, I. Eom, J. Park, D. Nam, S. Kim, S. H. Chun, H. Hyun, K. sook Kim, P. Juhas, E. S. Bozin, M. Lu, C. Song, H. Kim, S. J. L. Billinge, and I. K. Robinson, Ultrafast x-ray diffraction study of melt-front dynamics in polycrystalline thin films, Science Advances6, eaax2445 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Antonowicz, A

    J. Antonowicz, A. Olczak, K. Sokolowski-Tinten, P. Zalden, I. Milov, P. Dzięgielewski, C. Bressler, H. N. Chapman, M. Chojnacki, P. Dłużewski, A. Rodriguez-Fernandez, K. Fronc, W. Gawełda, K. Georgarakis, A. L. Greer, I. Jacyna, R. W. van de Kruijs, R. Kamiński, 11 D. Khakhulin, D. Klinger, K. M. Kosyl, K. Kubicek, K. P. Migdal, R. Minikayev, N. T. Pana- ...

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Z. Chen, C. Curry, R. Zhang, F. Treffert, N. Stojanovic, S. Toleikis, R. Pan, M. Gauthier, E. Zapolnova, L. Seipp,et al., Ultrafast multi-cycle terahertz measurements of the electrical conductivity in strongly excited solids, Nature communications12, 1638 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Ofori-Okai, A

    B. Ofori-Okai, A. Descamps, E. Toro, M. Ikeya, H. SB, M. Mo, A. Baczewski, D. Brown, F. LB, E. McBride, X. Shen, A. Weinmann, J. Yang, J. Schein, Z. Chen, X. Wang, and S. Glenzer, Unveiling structural effects on the DC conductivity of warm dense matter via Terahertz spectroscopy and ultrafast electron diffraction, Nature Communications16, 10541 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Walther, D

    M. Walther, D. G. Cooke, C. Sherstan, M. Hajar, M. R. Freeman, and F. A. Hegmann, Terahertz conductivity of thin gold films at the metal-insulator percolation transition, Physical Review B76, 125408 (2007)

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    Ofori-Okai, A

    B. Ofori-Okai, A. Descamps, J. Lu, L. Seipp, A. Weinmann, S. Glenzer, and Z. Chen, Toward quasi-DC conductivity of warm dense matter measured by single-shot terahertz spectroscopy, Review of Scientific Instruments89, 10D109 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Ofori-Okai, A

    B. Ofori-Okai, A. Descamps, E. McBride, M. Mo, A. Weinmann, L. Seipp, S. Ali, Z. Chen, L. Fletcher, and S. Glenzer, DC electrical conductivity measurements of warm dense matter using ultrafast THz radiation, Physics of Plasmas31, 042711 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    H. Zhao, Y. Tan, T. Wu, G. Steinfeld, Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, L. Zhang, and M. Shalaby, Efficient broadband terahertz generation from organic crystal BNA using near infrared pump, Applied Physics Letters114(2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    I. C. Tangen, G. A. Valdivia-Berroeta, L. K. Heki, Z. B. Zaccardi, E. W. Jackson, C. B. Bahr, S.-H. Ho, D. J. Michaelis, and J. A. Johnson, Comprehensive characterization of terahertz generation with the organic crystal BNA, Journal of the Optical Society of America B38, 2780 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Minami, Y

    Y. Minami, Y. Hayashi, J. Takeda, and I. Katayama, Single-shot measurement of a terahertz electric-field waveform using a reflective echelon mirror, Applied Physics Letters103, 051103 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Tinkham, Energy gap interpretation of experiments on infrared transmission through su- perconducting films, Physical Review104, 845 (1956)

    M. Tinkham, Energy gap interpretation of experiments on infrared transmission through su- perconducting films, Physical Review104, 845 (1956)

    work page 1956

  32. [32]

    P. D. Ndione, S. T. Weber, D. O. Gericke, and B. Rethfeld, Nonequilibrium band occupation and optical response of gold after ultrafast XUV excitation, Scientific Reports12, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    C.Fourment, F.Deneuville, D.Descamps, F.Dorchies, S.Petit,andO.Peyrusse,Experimental determination of temperature-dependent electron-electron collision frequency in isochorically heated warm dense gold, Phys. Rev. B89, 161110 (2014). 12

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. Mermin,Solid state (Cengage Learning, 1976)

    work page 1976

  35. [35]

    R. A. Matula, Electrical resistivity of copper, gold, palladium, and silver, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data8, 1147 (1979)

    work page 1979

  36. [36]

    S. I. Anisimov, B. L. Kapeliovich, and T. L. Perel’man, Electron emission from metal surfaces exposed to ultrashort laser pulses, Sov. Phys. JETP39, 375 (1974)

    work page 1974

  37. [37]

    Rethfeld, D

    B. Rethfeld, D. S. Ivanov, M. E. Garcia, and S. I. Anisimov, Modelling ultrafast laser ablation, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics50, 10.1088/1361-6463/50/19/193001 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/50/19/193001 2017

  38. [38]

    Z. Lin, L. V. Zhigilei, and V. Celli, Electron-phonon coupling and electron heat capacity of metals under conditions of strong electron-phonon nonequilibrium, Physical Review B77, 075133 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    Migdal, Y

    K. Migdal, Y. Petrov, D. Ilnitsky, V. Zhakhovsky, N. Inogamov, K. Khishchenko, D. Knyazev, and P. Levashov, Heat conductivity of copper in two-temperature state, Appl. Phys. A122, 408 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Schäfer, H

    C. Schäfer, H. M. Urbassek, and L. V. Zhigilei, Metal ablation by picosecond laser pulses: A hybrid simulation, Phys. Rev. B66, 115404 (2002)

    work page 2002

  41. [41]

    D. S. Ivanov and L. V. Zhigilei, Combined atomistic-continuum modeling of short-pulse laser melting and disintegration of metal films, Phys. Rev. B68, 064114 (2003)

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    H. W. Sheng, M. J. Kramer, A. Cadien, T. Fujita, and M. W. Chen, Highly optimized embedded-atom-method potentials for fourteen fcc metals, Phys. Rev. B83, 134118 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    P. D. Ndione, S. T. Weber, B. Rethfeld, and D. O. Gericke, Stable optical response during electron–phonon equilibration in laser-excited gold, Applied Physics Letters125(2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Z.Chen, M.Mo, L.Soulard, V.Recoules, P.Hering, Y.Tsui, S.Glenzer,andA.Ng,Interatomic potential in the nonequilibrium warm dense matter regime, Physical Review Letters121, 075002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Rethfeld, K

    B. Rethfeld, K. Sokolowski-Tinten, D. von der Linde, and S. Anisimov, Ultrafast thermal melting of laser-excited solids by homogeneous nucleation, Phys. Rev. B65, 092103 (2002). 13

    work page 2002