arxiv: 2604.15496 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Covariant Fracton Electrodynamics in Six Dimensions

Nicola Maggiore

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 09:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords fracton electrodynamicscovariant formulationsymmetric tensor gauge fieldscalar gauge symmetrydipole conservationgeneralized global symmetrysix-dimensional field theory

0 comments

The pith

A symmetric tensor gauge field with scalar symmetry in six dimensions yields covariant fracton electrodynamics where charge immobility follows from gauge invariance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a covariant version of Maxwell-like fracton electrodynamics in six spacetime dimensions using a symmetric rank-two tensor gauge field. The scalar gauge symmetry directly implies the characteristic restrictions on particle mobility through the allowed couplings to matter. In the presence of sources the theory enforces conservation of both charge and dipole moment, so that isolated charges remain immobile while dipolar bound states can move. The stress-energy tensor is constructed and shown to have a trace with a universal dimension-dependent structure that reduces to a total derivative precisely in six dimensions. The overall structure is presented as a higher-moment realization of generalized global symmetry.

Core claim

The central claim is that the gauge symmetry δA_μν = ∂_μ ∂_ν Λ in six dimensions produces a relativistic fracton theory in which conservation of charge and dipole moment follows directly from gauge invariance, thereby capturing the immobility of isolated charges and the mobility of dipolar bound states while the trace of the stress-energy tensor becomes a total derivative only in this dimension.

What carries the argument

The symmetric tensor gauge field A_μν equipped with the scalar gauge transformation δA_μν = ∂_μ ∂_ν Λ, which restricts matter couplings and derives the fractonic mobility rules from gauge invariance alone.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen scalar gauge symmetry together with the restriction to six spacetime dimensions is sufficient to derive the fractonic mobility restrictions and the total-derivative trace property without inconsistencies.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the stress-energy tensor trace that fails to reduce to a total derivative in six dimensions, or a consistent coupling to matter that permits an isolated charge to move while preserving the gauge symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15496 by Nicola Maggiore.

read the original abstract

We formulate a covariant version of Maxwell-like fracton electrodynamics in six dimensions using a symmetric tensor gauge field with scalar gauge symmetry $\delta A_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu\partial_\nu\Lambda$. This provides a relativistic setting in which the characteristic fractonic restriction on mobility follows directly from gauge invariance and the allowed coupling to matter. We construct the stress--energy tensor and show that its trace has a universal dimension-dependent structure that becomes a total derivative in $d=6$. In the presence of sources, the theory enforces conservation of charge and dipole moment, capturing the immobility of isolated charges and the mobility of dipolar bound states. This structure can also be viewed as a higher-moment form of generalized global symmetry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A 6D covariant fracton model where scalar gauge symmetry on a symmetric tensor field enforces charge and dipole conservation, with the stress tensor trace becoming a total derivative.

read the letter

This paper gives a covariant formulation of fracton electrodynamics in six dimensions. It uses a symmetric tensor gauge field with the scalar gauge symmetry δA_μν = ∂_μ ∂_ν Λ, so that mobility restrictions on charges emerge directly from gauge invariance and the allowed matter couplings. In the presence of sources the theory conserves charge and dipole moment, which matches the usual fracton picture of immobile isolated charges and mobile dipoles. It also frames the setup as a higher-moment generalized global symmetry.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates a covariant version of Maxwell-like fracton electrodynamics in six spacetime dimensions. It introduces a symmetric rank-2 tensor gauge field A_μν subject to the scalar gauge transformation δA_μν = ∂_μ ∂_ν Λ. The authors claim that this symmetry directly enforces the characteristic fractonic mobility restrictions via gauge invariance and allowed matter couplings. They construct the stress-energy tensor and show that its trace has a universal dimension-dependent structure that reduces to a total derivative specifically in d=6. In the presence of sources the theory conserves charge and dipole moment, capturing immobility of isolated charges and mobility of dipolar bound states, and interpret the structure as a higher-moment form of generalized global symmetry.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a relativistic covariant framework in which fracton-like mobility restrictions emerge directly from a scalar gauge symmetry without additional ad-hoc constraints. This could provide a useful bridge between non-relativistic fracton models and higher-dimensional field theory, particularly through the link to higher-moment conservation laws and generalized global symmetries. The dimension-specific reduction of the stress-tensor trace to a total derivative is an interesting structural feature that may have implications for conformal or anomaly properties in such theories.

major comments (2)

[main text (Lagrangian and equations of motion section)] The central claim that mobility restrictions follow directly from the gauge symmetry δA_μν=∂_μ∂_νΛ requires an explicit derivation of the conserved charge and dipole currents from the equations of motion or Noether procedure. This step is load-bearing for the fractonic interpretation but is not shown in the abstract or summary; the Lagrangian (or action) and the resulting conservation laws must be displayed with the relevant equations.
[stress-energy tensor construction] The assertion that the trace of the stress-energy tensor becomes a total derivative only in d=6 is dimensionally specific and central to the covariant formulation. The explicit construction of the stress-energy tensor and the algebraic reduction of its trace must be provided, including the relevant contractions and integration-by-parts identities used.

minor comments (2)

[abstract] The abstract refers to 'Maxwell-like' fracton electrodynamics without specifying the precise kinetic term or field strength; a brief comparison to the standard Maxwell action or to existing fracton literature would improve clarity.
[introduction or model definition] Notation for the symmetric tensor A_μν and the scalar parameter Λ should be introduced with an explicit statement of symmetry properties (e.g., A_μν = A_νμ) at first use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [main text (Lagrangian and equations of motion section)] The central claim that mobility restrictions follow directly from the gauge symmetry δA_μν=∂_μ∂_νΛ requires an explicit derivation of the conserved charge and dipole currents from the equations of motion or Noether procedure. This step is load-bearing for the fractonic interpretation but is not shown in the abstract or summary; the Lagrangian (or action) and the resulting conservation laws must be displayed with the relevant equations.

Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the conserved currents is necessary to make the fractonic interpretation fully rigorous and transparent. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection presenting the full Lagrangian, deriving the equations of motion from it, and applying the Noether procedure associated with the scalar gauge symmetry δA_μν = ∂_μ ∂_ν Λ to obtain the explicit expressions for the conserved charge and dipole currents. This will directly demonstrate how gauge invariance enforces the mobility restrictions. revision: yes
Referee: [stress-energy tensor construction] The assertion that the trace of the stress-energy tensor becomes a total derivative only in d=6 is dimensionally specific and central to the covariant formulation. The explicit construction of the stress-energy tensor and the algebraic reduction of its trace must be provided, including the relevant contractions and integration-by-parts identities used.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for greater explicitness here. In the revision we will expand the relevant section to display the complete construction of the stress-energy tensor, the index contractions performed, and the step-by-step algebraic reduction (including the specific integration-by-parts identities) that shows the trace reduces to a total derivative exclusively in six dimensions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from posited symmetry

full rationale

The paper starts by positing a symmetric tensor gauge field A_μν together with the scalar gauge symmetry δA_μν = ∂_μ ∂_ν Λ in d=6. From this input it derives, via the standard Noether procedure and the equations of motion, the conservation of charge and dipole moment (hence the mobility restrictions) and the fact that the trace of the stress-energy tensor reduces to a total derivative. These are presented as direct consequences rather than inputs or fitted quantities. No self-citation is invoked as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, no ansatz is smuggled via prior work, and no known result is merely renamed. The central claims therefore do not reduce to the inputs by construction; the derivation chain remains independent and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central construction rests on introducing a new gauge field and symmetry chosen to reproduce fracton behavior, plus the specific choice of six dimensions for the trace property; no numerical free parameters are indicated.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Gauge transformation is δA_μν = ∂_μ ∂_ν Λ for scalar Λ
This symmetry is posited to enforce the fractonic mobility restrictions directly from gauge invariance.
domain assumption Formulation is performed in exactly six spacetime dimensions
Required for the trace of the stress-energy tensor to become a total derivative.

invented entities (1)

Symmetric tensor gauge field A_μν no independent evidence
purpose: To serve as the covariant gauge potential for fracton electrodynamics
New field introduced whose gauge symmetry encodes the mobility rules.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5402 in / 1620 out tokens · 40749 ms · 2026-05-10T09:52:24.390785+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

[1]

Fracton hydrodynamics,

A. Gromov, A. Lucas and R. M. Nandkishore, “Fracton hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, no.3, 033124 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033124

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033124 2020
[2]

Subdimensional Particle Structure of Higher Rank U(1) Spin Liquids,

M. Pretko, “Subdimensional Particle Structure of Higher Rank U(1) Spin Liquids,” Phys. Rev. B95, no.11, 115139 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.115139

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.115139 2017
[3]

Generalized Electromagnetism of Subdimensional Particles: A Spin Liquid Story,

M. Pretko, “Generalized Electromagnetism of Subdimensional Particles: A Spin Liquid Story,” Phys. Rev. B96, no.3, 035119 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.035119

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.035119 2017
[4]

Quantum Glassiness,

C. Chamon, “Quantum Glassiness,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94, no.4, 040402 (2005) doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.040402

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.040402 2005
[5]

Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions without string logical operators,

J. Haah, “Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions without string logical operators,” Phys. Rev. A83, no.4, 042330 (2011) doi:10.1103/physreva.83.042330

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.83.042330 2011
[6]

Quantum Self-Correction in the 3D Cubic Code Model,

S. Bravyi and J. Haah, “Quantum Self-Correction in the 3D Cubic Code Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.111, no.20, 200501 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.200501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.200501 2013
[7]

Fractal symmetries: Ungauging the cubic code,

D. J. Williamson, “Fractal symmetries: Ungauging the cubic code,” Phys. Rev. B94, 155128 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155128

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.155128 2016
[8]

Fracton topological order from nearest-neighbor two-spin interactions and dualities,

K. Slagle and Y. B. Kim, “Fracton topological order from nearest-neighbor two-spin interactions and dualities,” Phys. Rev. B96, no.16, 165106 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.165106

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.165106 2017
[9]

Fracton Topological Order, Generalized Lat- tice Gauge Theory and Duality,

S. Vijay, J. Haah and L. Fu, “Fracton Topological Order, Generalized Lat- tice Gauge Theory and Duality,” Phys. Rev. B94, no.23, 235157 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235157

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.235157 2016
[10]

Gauging fractons: immobile non-Abelian quasiparticles, fractals, and position-dependent degeneracies,

D. Bulmash and M. Barkeshli, “Gauging fractons: immobile non-Abelian quasiparticles, fractals, and position-dependent degeneracies,” Phys. Rev. B100, no.15, 155146 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.155146

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.155146 2019
[11]

Fractons from vector gauge theory,

L. Radzihovsky and M. Hermele, “Fractons from vector gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, no.5, 050402 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.050402

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.050402 2020
[12]

Exotic Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,

N. Seiberg and S. H. Shao, “Exotic Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,” SciPost Phys.10, no.2, 027 (2021) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.2.027

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.10.2.027 2021
[13]

More Exotic Field Theories in 3+1 Dimensions,

P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg and S. H. Shao, “More Exotic Field Theories in 3+1 Dimensions,” SciPost Phys.9, 073 (2020) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.5.073

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.9.5.073 2020
[14]

Global dipole symmetry, compact Lifshitz theory, tensor gauge theory, and fractons,

P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg and S. H. Shao, “Global dipole symmetry, compact Lifshitz theory, tensor gauge theory, and fractons,” Phys. Rev. B106, no.4, 045112 26 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.045112

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.045112 2022
[15]

(2+1)-dimensional compact Lifshitz theory, tensor gauge theory, and fractons,

P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg and S. H. Shao, “(2+1)-dimensional compact Lifshitz theory, tensor gauge theory, and fractons,” Phys. Rev. B108, no.7, 075106 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.075106

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.075106 2023
[16]

Fracton topological order from the Higgs and partial- confinement mechanisms of rank-two gauge theory,

H. Ma, M. Hermele and X. Chen, “Fracton topological order from the Higgs and partial- confinement mechanisms of rank-two gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. B98, no.3, 035111 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035111

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.035111 2018
[17]

Cage-Net Fracton Models,

A. Prem, S. J. Huang, H. Song and M. Hermele, “Cage-Net Fracton Models,” Phys. Rev. X9, no.2, 021010 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021010

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.021010 2019
[18]

Emergent fractons and algebraic quantum liq- uid from plaquette melting transitions,

Y. You, Z. Bi and M. Pretko, “Emergent fractons and algebraic quantum liq- uid from plaquette melting transitions,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, no.1, 013162 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013162

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013162 2020
[19]

Foliated fracton order from gauging subsystem symmetries,

W. Shirley, K. Slagle and X. Chen, “Foliated fracton order from gauging subsystem symmetries,” SciPost Phys.6, no.4, 041 (2019) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.4.041

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.6.4.041 2019
[20]

Foliated Field Theory and String-Membrane- Net Condensation Picture of Fracton Order,

K. Slagle, D. Aasen and D. Williamson, “Foliated Field Theory and String-Membrane- Net Condensation Picture of Fracton Order,” SciPost Phys.6, no.4, 043 (2019) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.4.043

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.6.4.043 2019
[21]

Foliated Quantum Field Theory of Fracton Order,

K. Slagle, “Foliated Quantum Field Theory of Fracton Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, no.10, 101603 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.101603

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.101603 2021
[22]

Gauging nexus between topological and fracton phases,

P. Gorantla, A. Prem, N. Tantivasadakarn and D. J. Williamson, “Gauging nexus between topological and fracton phases,” Phys. Rev. B113, no.8, 085110 (2026) doi:10.1103/k7nh-sxrs

work page doi:10.1103/k7nh-sxrs 2026
[23]

Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra,

A. Gromov, “Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra,” Phys. Rev. X9, no.3, 031035 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031035

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031035 2019
[24]

Pretko, X

M. Pretko, X. Chen and Y. You, “Fracton Phases of Matter,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, no.06, 2030003 (2020) doi:10.1142/S0217751X20300033

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x20300033 2020
[25]

Nandkishore and M

R. M. Nandkishore and M. Hermele, “Fractons,” Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 10, 295-313 (2019) doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013604

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013604 2019
[26]

Localization in fractonic random circuits,

S. Pai, M. Pretko and R. M. Nandkishore, “Localization in fractonic random circuits,” Phys. Rev. X9, no.2, 021003 (2019); Erratum in Phys. Rev. X9, no.4, 049901 (2019). doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021003

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.021003 2019
[27]

Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,

J. McGreevy, “Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,” Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14, 57-82 (2023) doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-021029. 27

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-021029 2023
[28]

Gauge procedure with gauge fields of various ranks,

D. Singleton, A. Kato and A. Yoshida, “Gauge procedure with gauge fields of various ranks,” Phys. Lett. A330, 326-337 (2004)

2004
[29]

Nontrivial fixed points of the renormalization group in six-dimensions,

N. Seiberg, “Nontrivial fixed points of the renormalization group in six dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B390, 169-171 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9609161 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1997
[30]

On the Classification of 6D SCFTs and Generalized ADE Orbifolds,

J. J. Heckman, D. R. Morrison and C. Vafa, “On the Classification of 6D SCFTs and Generalized ADE Orbifolds,” JHEP05, 028 (2014); Erratum in JHEP06, 017 (2015). doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)028

work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2014)028 2014
[31]

Top Down Approach to 6D SCFTs,

J. J. Heckman and T. Rudelius, “Top Down Approach to 6D SCFTs,” J. Phys. A52, no.9, 093001 (2019) doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aafc81

work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aafc81 2019
[32]

Anomalies, Renormalization Group Flows, and thea-Theorem in Six-Dimensional (1,0) Theories,

C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, “Anomalies, Renormalization Group Flows, and thea-Theorem in Six-Dimensional (1,0) Theories,” JHEP10, 080 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2016)080

work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2016)080 2016
[33]

Maxwell theory of fractons,

E. Bertolini and N. Maggiore, “Maxwell theory of fractons,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.12, 125008 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.125008

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.125008 2022
[34]

The theory of symmetric tensor field: From fractons to gravi- tons and back,

A. Blasi and N. Maggiore, “The theory of symmetric tensor field: From fractons to gravi- tons and back,” Phys. Lett. B833, 137304 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137304

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137304 2022
[35]

Gauging Fractons and Linearized Gravity,

E. Bertolini, A. Blasi, A. Damonte and N. Maggiore, “Gauging Fractons and Linearized Gravity,” Symmetry15, no.4, 945 (2023) doi:10.3390/sym15040945

work page doi:10.3390/sym15040945 2023
[36]

A New improved energy - momentum tensor,

C. G. Callan, Jr., S. R. Coleman and R. Jackiw, “A New improved energy - momentum tensor,” Annals Phys.59, 42-73 (1970) doi:10.1016/0003-4916(70)90394-5

work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(70)90394-5 1970
[37]

The Fracton Gauge Principle,

M. Pretko, “The Fracton Gauge Principle,” Phys. Rev. B98, no.11, 115134 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.115134

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.115134 2018
[38]

Fracton-Elasticity Duality,

M. Pretko and L. Radzihovsky, “Fracton-Elasticity Duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, no.19, 195301 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.195301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.195301 2018
[39]

Chiral Topological Elasticity and Fracton Order,

A. Gromov, “Chiral Topological Elasticity and Fracton Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, no.7, 076403 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.076403

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.076403 2019
[40]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,” JHEP02, 172 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)172

work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2015)172 2015
[41]

Higher-form symmetries and spontaneous symmetry breaking

E. Lake, “Higher-form symmetries and spontaneous symmetry breaking,” [arXiv:1802.07747 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv
[42]

Transverse Fierz-Pauli symmetry,

E. Alvarez, D. Blas, J. Garriga and E. Verdaguer, “Transverse Fierz-Pauli symmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B756, 148-170 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.08.003

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.08.003 2006
[43]

Analysis of fracton-gravity stability,

E. Afxonidis, A. Caddeo, C. Hoyos and D. Musso, “Analysis of fracton-gravity stability,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.8, 085016 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.085016. 28

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.085016 2024
[44]

On ghost-free tensor lagrangians and linearized gravitation,

P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, “On ghost-free tensor lagrangians and linearized gravitation,” Nucl. Phys. B60, 478-492 (1973) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(73)90194-6

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(73)90194-6 1973
[45]

The recipe for the degrees of freedom,

A. Hell, E. G. M. Ferreira, D. Lust and M. Sasaki, “The recipe for the degrees of freedom,” [arXiv:2601.10288 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[46]

Symmetric Tensor Gauge Theories on Curved Spaces,

K. Slagle, A. Prem and M. Pretko, “Symmetric Tensor Gauge Theories on Curved Spaces,” Annals Phys.410, 167910 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.167910

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.167910 2019
[47]

Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime,

L. Bidussi, J. Hartong, E. Have, J. Musaeus and S. Prohazka, “Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime,” SciPost Phys.12, no.6, 205 (2022) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.6.205

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.12.6.205 2022
[48]

Fractons in curved space,

A. Jain and K. Jensen, “Fractons in curved space,” SciPost Phys.12, no.4, 142 (2022) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.4.142

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.12.4.142 2022
[49]

Fracton Gauge Theories in Curved Spacetimes,

E. Afxonidis, A. Caddeo, C. Hoyos and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, “Fracton Gauge Theories in Curved Spacetimes,” [arXiv:2503.08621 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[50]

Scale and Conformal Invariance in Quantum Field Theory,

J. Polchinski, “Scale and Conformal Invariance in Quantum Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B303, 226-236 (1988) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90179-4

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90179-4 1988
[51]

Analogs for thecTheorem for Four-dimensional Renormalizable Field Theories,

I. Jack and H. Osborn, “Analogs for thecTheorem for Four-dimensional Renormalizable Field Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B343, 647-688 (1990) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90584-Z

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90584-z 1990
[52]

Scale without Conformal Invariance: An Example,

J. F. Fortin, B. Grinstein and A. Stergiou, “Scale without Conformal Invariance: An Example,” Phys. Lett. B704, 74-80 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.08.060

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.08.060 2011
[53]

Scale Invariance, Conformality, and Generalized Free Fields,

A. Dymarsky, K. Farnsworth, Z. Komargodski, M. A. Luty and V. Prilepina, “Scale Invariance, Conformality, and Generalized Free Fields,” JHEP02, 099 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)099

work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)099 2016
[54]

Scale invariance vs conformal invariance,

Y. Nakayama, “Scale invariance vs conformal invariance,” Phys. Rept.569, 1-93 (2015) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.003

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.003 2015
[55]

Bertolini, N

E. Bertolini, N. Maggiore and G. Palumbo, “Covariant fracton gauge theory with bound- ary,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.2, 025009 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.025009. 29

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.025009 2023