pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15605 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas

Deterministic multiphoton bundle emission via interference-interaction control

Jing Tang , Yuangang Deng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords multiphoton emissioncavity QEDgeometric phasespin-exchange interactiondressed statesnonclassical lightquantum opticsphoton bundles
0
0 comments X

The pith

A geometric phase of 2π/3 combined with cavity-mediated interactions in three atoms activates a resonant three-photon channel while suppressing single- and two-photon processes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a scheme for generating controlled few-photon light in a cavity containing three atoms coupled to orthogonal modes. By introducing a tunable spin-exchange interaction and a geometric phase, the collective dressed states are rearranged so that specific excitation manifolds map cleanly onto photon emission channels. At a phase value of 2π/3, destructive interference blocks lower-order pathways and opens a resonant route from the three-excitation manifold. This produces more than two orders of magnitude more three-photon light and three orders of magnitude higher two-photon purity. The approach demonstrates that phase and interaction together can be used to engineer effective nonlinearities for multiphoton sources.

Core claim

In the three-atom cavity-QED system, adiabatically eliminating an auxiliary Fabry-Pérot cavity generates a tunable cavity-mediated spin-exchange interaction χ. Combined with a controllable geometric phase φ, this interaction reshapes the many-body dressed-state spectrum and establishes a direct mapping between excitation manifolds and photon-emission channels. For φ = 2π/3, destructive interference suppresses pathways from the N = 1 and N = 2 manifolds while activating a resonant three-photon channel from the N = 3 manifold, yielding more than two orders of magnitude improvement in three-photon emission and a three-order enhancement in two-photon purity.

What carries the argument

The tunable geometric phase φ together with the cavity-mediated spin-exchange interaction χ, which together reshape the dressed-state spectrum to map atomic excitation manifolds directly onto selective photon-emission channels.

Load-bearing premise

The adiabatic elimination of the auxiliary Fabry-Pérot cavity produces an accurate effective model for the spin-exchange interaction χ without significant errors at the chosen parameters.

What would settle it

Measuring the emitted photon statistics in the three-atom setup and finding no substantial increase in three-photon rate or two-photon purity when the phase is set to 2π/3 compared with other phase values would falsify the selective channel activation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15605 by Jing Tang, Yuangang Deng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of cavity-coupled three atom array [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Phase-controlled photon statistics in the absenc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Phase diagram of photon correlations and emission [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase-space mapping of steady-state photon corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The controlled generation of nonclassical light beyond single photons remains a central challenge in quantum optics, due to the difficulty of enhancing multiphoton processes while suppressing lower-order excitations. Here we propose an interference-interaction-engineered scheme for programmable few-photon emission in a cavity-QED system of three atoms coupled to orthogonal cavity modes. By adiabatically eliminating an auxiliary Fabry-P\'erot cavity, we generate a tunable cavity-mediated spin-exchange interaction $\chi$, which, combined with a controllable geometric phase $\phi$, reshapes the many-body dressed-state spectrum. This interplay enables selective addressing of excitation manifolds ($N=1,2,3$), establishing a direct mapping between excitation structure and photon-emission channels. For $\phi=0$, constructive interference enhances the spectral anharmonicity of low-excitation manifolds, yielding tunable single- and two-photon emission associated with the $N=1$ and $N=2$ manifolds. In contrast, for $\phi=2\pi/3$, destructive interference suppresses lower-order excitation pathways and activates a resonant three-photon channel originating from the $N=3$ manifold. Importantly, the cavity-mediated interaction $\chi$ further enhances spectral separation between manifolds, enabling a substantial improvement in multiphoton purity while maintaining a sizable photon population. We demonstrate a three-order-of-magnitude enhancement in two-photon purity and more than two orders of magnitude improvement in three-photon emission. Our results establish a unified interference-interaction framework in which effective optical nonlinearities can be programmably engineered through phase and interaction, providing a scalable route toward high-purity multiphoton sources and programmable quantum photonic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a theoretical scheme for deterministic multiphoton bundle emission in a three-atom cavity-QED system coupled to orthogonal modes. By adiabatically eliminating an auxiliary Fabry-Pérot cavity to obtain a tunable spin-exchange interaction χ and combining it with a controllable geometric phase φ, the authors reshape the many-body dressed-state spectrum to selectively address excitation manifolds N=1,2,3. For φ=0 constructive interference enhances low-order anharmonicity for single- and two-photon emission; for φ=2π/3 destructive interference suppresses lower pathways and activates a resonant three-photon channel from N=3, with claimed improvements of more than two orders of magnitude in three-photon emission and three orders in two-photon purity.

Significance. If the derivations and numerics hold, the work supplies a programmable, first-principles route to engineer effective optical nonlinearities via interference-interaction control, yielding high-purity multiphoton sources without fitted parameters. This is a concrete advance for scalable quantum photonic devices and could be tested in existing cavity-QED platforms.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theory section (Hamiltonian derivation)] The adiabatic elimination of the auxiliary Fabry-Pérot cavity that produces the effective χ (detailed in the theory section deriving the many-body Hamiltonian) is load-bearing for all subsequent spectral reshaping and purity claims. The manuscript should supply explicit error bounds or a direct comparison between the full and effective models for the parameter values used to obtain the >2-order three-photon improvement at φ=2π/3.
  2. [Results section (numerical simulations)] The quantitative claims of three-order enhancement in two-photon purity and more than two orders of magnitude improvement in three-photon emission (presented in the results section with numerical simulations) rest on specific choices of χ and driving parameters. The paper must include the exact parameter sets, baseline comparisons without χ, and convergence checks with respect to truncation of the Hilbert space to substantiate these numbers.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the values of φ and χ used in each panel to allow immediate cross-reference with the text claims.
  2. [Methods] The definition of photon purity (e.g., g^(2) or higher-order correlation functions) is used throughout but would benefit from a single consolidated equation in the methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal depends on standard cavity-QED modeling assumptions and introduces two tunable control parameters whose values are chosen to achieve the desired interference regimes.

free parameters (2)
  • geometric phase φ
    Tunable parameter set to 0 or 2π/3 to switch between constructive and destructive interference for different excitation manifolds.
  • cavity-mediated spin-exchange interaction χ
    Effective interaction strength generated by adiabatic elimination and used to enhance spectral separation between manifolds.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Adiabatic elimination of auxiliary Fabry-Pérot cavity produces valid effective χ without higher-order corrections
    Invoked to derive the tunable interaction from the full system.
  • domain assumption Three atoms coupled to orthogonal cavity modes with controllable geometric phase
    Core setup assumption enabling the many-body dressed states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5589 in / 1296 out tokens · 16987 ms · 2026-05-10T08:41:13.934883+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    21, signaling the activation of the two-photon emission channel (light-yellow regions)

    4 × 10− 2, and ns = 0 . 21, signaling the activation of the two-photon emission channel (light-yellow regions). Here, the spectral proximity of the N = 2 manifold en- ables sequential two-photon excitation, while residual an- harmonicity partially suppresses higher-order processes. In contrast, for φ = 2π/ 3, destructive interference sup- presses the coup...

    work page

  2. [2]

    This asymmetry arises from interaction-induced energy shifts, which break the inherent ∆ a ↔ − ∆ a symmetry of the excitation spec- trum and modify the resonance conditions

    In contrast to the symmetric response of the noninteracting case, the photon statistics become strongly asymmetric with respect to the detuning ∆ a. This asymmetry arises from interaction-induced energy shifts, which break the inherent ∆ a ↔ − ∆ a symmetry of the excitation spec- trum and modify the resonance conditions. For φ = 0, the single- and two-pho...

    work page

  3. [3]

    5 × 10− 3, and ns = 1

    19, g(4) 1 (0) = 3 . 5 × 10− 3, and ns = 1 . 26 × 10− 1. Com- pared to the noninteracting case, the photon number is substantially increased while higher-order correlations are strongly suppressed, indicating a simultaneous im- provement in both efficiency and purity. Physically, the role of the SEI χ is to reinforce the spectral isolation between different ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Once ∆ a/g a > 2

    05, the residual coupling to the N = 1 manifold remains significant, and the emission retains a single-photon char- acter. Once ∆ a/g a > 2. 05, the N = 2 channel becomes dominant and the system transitions into the two-photon regime. This crossover originates from the gradual en- hancement of spectral isolation: increasing ∆ a pushes the N = 1 manifold off...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Here MN is the Hamiltonian matrix in the N -excitation subspace

    onto fixed excitation-number manifolds and solving: det( MN ) = 0. Here MN is the Hamiltonian matrix in the N -excitation subspace

    work page

  6. [6]

    Single-excitation manifold with φ = 0 We first analyze the N = 1 manifold for fixing φ = 0 and δ = ∆ a/ 2. Then the zero-energy resonant condition can be obtained analytically due to the underlying S3 symmetry, corresponding to the Hamiltonian in the basis Ψ = {|gge, 0⟩, |geg, 0⟩, |egg, 0⟩, |ggg, 1⟩}T M1 =     ∆ a 2 + χ χ χ g a χ ∆ a 2 + χ χ g a χ χ ∆ a...

    work page

  7. [7]

    For φ = 0 and δ = ∆ a/ 2, the Hilbert space is spanned by seven basis states, excluding the inaccessible | − 1, e, e, e ⟩

    Double-excitation manifold with φ = 0 We now turn to the N = 2 manifold. For φ = 0 and δ = ∆ a/ 2, the Hilbert space is spanned by seven basis states, excluding the inaccessible | − 1, e, e, e ⟩. The Hamiltonian takes the form M2 =           ∆ a 2 + χ χ χ 0 ga ga √ 2ga χ ∆ a 2 + χ χ g a 0 ga √ 2ga χ χ ∆ a 2 + χ g a ga 0 √ 2ga 0 ga ga − ∆ a + 2χ ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Triple-excitation manifold with φ = 2π/ 3 For φ = 2 π/ 3, destructive interference suppresses the lower-order excitation pathways and enables resonant higher-order processes. The system is spanned by the basis Ψ = {|2, g, g, e ⟩, |2, g, e, g ⟩, |2, e, g, g ⟩, |1, e, e, g ⟩, |1, e, g, e ⟩, |1, g, e, e ⟩, |0, e, e, e ⟩, |3, g, g, g ⟩}T , By introducing ω = ...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Long-distance quantum communication with atomic en- sembles and linear optics,

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Long-distance quantum communication with atomic en- sembles and linear optics,” Nature 414, 413 (2001)

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    The quantum internet,

    H. J. Kimble, “The quantum internet,” Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Advances in quantum metrology,

    Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone, “Advances in quantum metrology,” Nature Photonics 5, 222 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Photonic quan- tum simulators,

    Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik and Philip Walther, “Photonic quan- tum simulators,” Nature Physics 8, 285–291 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Strongly interacting photons in a nonlinear cavity,

    A. Imamoˇ glu, H. Schmidt, G. Woods, and M. Deutsch, “Strongly interacting photons in a nonlinear cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1467 (1997)

    work page 1997

  14. [14]

    Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot–cavity system,

    K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, M. Winger, D. Gerace, M. Atat¨ ure, S. Gulde, S. F¨ alt, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamo˘ glu, “Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot–cavity system,” Nature 445, 896 (2007)

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Breakdown of photon blockade: A dis- sipative quantum phase transition in zero dimensions,

    H. J. Carmichael, “Breakdown of photon blockade: A dis- sipative quantum phase transition in zero dimensions,” Phys. Rev. X 5, 031028 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Photon block- ade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom,

    K. M. Birnbaum, A. Boca, R. Miller, A. D. Boozer, T. E. Northup, and H. J. Kimble, “Photon block- ade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom,” Nature 436, 87 (2005)

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    Coherent generation of non-classical light on a chip via photon-induced tunnelling and block- ade,

    A. Faraon, I. Fushman, D. Englund, N. Stoltz, P. Petroff, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, “Coherent generation of non-classical light on a chip via photon-induced tunnelling and block- ade,” Nat. Phys. 4, 859 (2008)

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Climbing the jaynes– cummings ladder and observing its nonlinearity in a cav- ity qed system,

    J. M. Fink, M. G¨ oppl, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, P. J. Leek, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, “Climbing the jaynes– cummings ladder and observing its nonlinearity in a cav- ity qed system,” Nature 454, 315 (2008)

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Strongly corre- lated photons on a chip,

    A. Reinhard, T. Volz, M. Winger, A. Badolato, K. J. Hennessy, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamoˇ glu, “Strongly corre- lated photons on a chip,” Nature Photon. 6, 93 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Coher- ent generation of nonclassical light on chip via detuned photon blockade,

    Kai M¨ uller, Armand Rundquist, Kevin A. Fis- cher, Tomas Sarmiento, Konstantinos G. Lagoudakis, Yousif A. Kelaita, Carlos S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, Elena del Valle, Fabrice P. Laussy, and Jelena Vuˇ ckovi´ c, “Coher- ent generation of nonclassical light on chip via detuned photon blockade,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 233601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Tun- able photon blockade with a single atom in a cavity under electromagnetically induced transparency,

    Jing Tang, Yuangang Deng, and Chaohong Lee, “Tun- able photon blockade with a single atom in a cavity under electromagnetically induced transparency,” Photon. Res. 9, 1226–1233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Multiphoton jaynes-cummings model: Arbitrary rotations in fock space and quantum filters,

    Celso J. Villas-Boas and Daniel Z. Rossatto, “Multiphoton jaynes-cummings model: Arbitrary rotations in fock space and quantum filters,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 123604 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    On-demand generation of indis- tinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs,

    M. M¨ uller, S. Bounouar, K. D. J¨ ons, M. Gl¨ assl, and P. Michler, “On-demand generation of indis- tinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs,” Nature Photonics 8, 224–228 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Emitters of n-photon bun- dles,

    C S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, E Del Valle, A Gonz´ alez Tudela, K M¨ uller, S Lichtmannecker, M Kaniber, C Tejedor, JJ Finley, and FP Laussy, “Emitters of n-photon bun- dles,” Nat. photonics 8, 550–555 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Two-photon blockade in an atom-driven cavity qed system,

    Christoph Hamsen, Karl Nicolas Tolazzi, Tat- jana Wilk, and Gerhard Rempe, “Two-photon blockade in an atom-driven cavity qed system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 133604 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Parity- symmetry-protected multiphoton bundle emission,

    Qian Bin, Ying Wu, and Xin-You L¨ u, “Parity- symmetry-protected multiphoton bundle emission,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 073602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Two-photon rabi split- ting in a coupled system of a nanocavity and exciton complexes,

    Chenjiang Qian, Shiyao Wu, Feilong Song, Kai Peng, Xin Xie, Jingnan Yang, Shan Xiao, Matthew J. Steer, Iain G. Thayne, Chengchun Tang, Zhanchun Zuo, Kuijuan Jin, Changzhi Gu, and Xiulai Xu, “Two-photon rabi split- ting in a coupled system of a nanocavity and exciton complexes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 213901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Tunable single-and multiphoton bun- dles in cavity-coupled atomic arrays,

    Geng Zhao, Yun Chen, Jiayuang Zhang, Jing Tang, and Yuangang Deng, “Tunable single-and multiphoton bun- dles in cavity-coupled atomic arrays,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.01250 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Tunable multipho- ton bundles emission in a kerr-type two-photon jaynes- cummings model,

    Jing Tang and Yuangang Deng, “Tunable multipho- ton bundles emission in a kerr-type two-photon jaynes- cummings model,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033247 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Determinis- tic generation of multi-photon bundles in a quantum rabi model,

    Cheng Liu, Jin-Feng Huang, and Lin Tian, “Determinis- tic generation of multi-photon bundles in a quantum rabi model,” Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 66, 220311 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Nonreciprocal bundle emissions of quantum entan- gled pairs,

    Qian Bin, Hui Jing, Ying Wu, Franco Nori, and Xin-You L¨ u, “Nonreciprocal bundle emissions of quantum entan- gled pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 043601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly non- linear photonic molecules,

    M. Bamba, A. Imamoˇ glu, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, “Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly non- linear photonic molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 021802(R) (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Quantum interference induced photon blockade in a coupled single quantum dot-cavity system,

    Jing Tang, Weidong Geng, and Xiulai Xu, “Quantum interference induced photon blockade in a coupled single quantum dot-cavity system,” Scientific Reports 5, 9252 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Ob- servation of the unconventional photon blockade,

    H. J. Snijders, J. A. Frey, J. Norman, H. Flayac, V. Savona, A. C. Gossard, J. E. Bowers, M. P. van Exter, D. Bouwmeester, and W. L¨ offler, “Ob- servation of the unconventional photon blockade,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 043601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Observation of the unconven- tional photon blockade in the microwave domain,

    Cyril Vaneph, Alexis Morvan, Gianluca Aiello, Math- ieu F´ echant, Marco Aprili, Julien Gabelli, and J´ erˆ ome Est` eve, “Observation of the unconven- tional photon blockade in the microwave domain,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 043602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Universal photon blockade,

    Yan-Hui Zhou, Tong Liu, Qi-Ping Su, Xing-Yuan Zhang, Qi-Cheng Wu, Dong-Xu Chen, Zhi-Cheng Shi, HZ Shen, and Chui-Ping Yang, “Universal photon blockade,” Phys- ical Review Letters 134, 183601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Single photons from coupled quantum modes,

    T. C. H. Liew and V. Savona, “Single photons from coupled quantum modes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 183601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Loss-enabled sub-poissonian light gener- ation in a bimodal nanocavity,

    A. Majumdar, M. Bajcsy, A. Rundquist, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, “Loss-enabled sub-poissonian light gener- ation in a bimodal nanocavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 183601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Unconventional photon block- ade,

    H. Flayac and V. Savona, “Unconventional photon block- ade,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 053810 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Strong photon blockade mediated by op- tical stark shift in a single-atom-cavity system,

    Jing Tang, Yuangang Deng, and Chaohong Lee, “Strong photon blockade mediated by op- tical stark shift in a single-atom-cavity system,” Phys. Rev. Applied 12, 044065 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Giant enhancement 12 of unconventional photon blockade in a dimer chain,

    You Wang, W. Verstraelen, Baile Zhang, Timothy C. H. Liew, and Y. D. Chong, “Giant enhancement 12 of unconventional photon blockade in a dimer chain,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 240402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Photon blockade and single-photon generation with multiple quantum emitters,

    Mingyuan Chen, Jiangshan Tang, Lei Tang, Haodong Wu, and Keyu Xia, “Photon blockade and single-photon generation with multiple quantum emitters,” Physical Review Research 4, 033083 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Strong single-photon to two-photon bundles emission in spin-1 jaynes-cummings model,

    Jing Tang and Yuangang Deng, “Strong single-photon to two-photon bundles emission in spin-1 jaynes-cummings model,” (2022), arXiv:2209.13390 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Strongly interacting polaritons in cou- pled arrays of cavities,

    Michael J. Hartmann, Fernando G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, and Martin B. Plenio, “Strongly interacting polaritons in cou- pled arrays of cavities,” Nature Physics 2, 849 (2006)

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    Photon-mediated interactions between distant artificial atoms,

    Arjan F Van Loo, Arkady Fedorov, Kevin Lalumiere, Barry C Sanders, Alexandre Blais, and Andreas Wallraff, “Photon-mediated interactions between distant artificial atoms,” Science 342, 1494–1496 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Quantum nonlinear optics -photon by photon,

    Darrick E. Chang, Vladan Vuleti´ c, and Mikhail D. Lukin, “Quantum nonlinear optics -photon by photon,” Nature Photonics 8, 685 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Photon-mediated interactions: A scalable tool to cre- ate and sustain entangled states of n atoms,

    Camille Aron, Manas Kulkarni, and Hakan E T¨ ureci, “Photon-mediated interactions: A scalable tool to cre- ate and sustain entangled states of n atoms,” Physical Review X 6, 011032 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Tunable-range, photon-mediated atomic interactions in multimode cavity qed,

    Varun D Vaidya, Yudan Guo, Ronen M Kroeze, Kyle E Ballantine, Alicia J Koll´ ar, Jonathan Keeling, and Ben- jamin L Lev, “Tunable-range, photon-mediated atomic interactions in multimode cavity qed,” Physical Review X 8, 011002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical pho- tons,

    Andreas Reiserer and Gerhard Rempe, “Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical pho- tons,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379–1418 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Enhancing strength and range of atom- atom interaction in a coupled-cavity array via parametric drives,

    Ya-long Ren, Sheng-li Ma, Stefano Zippilli, David Vitali, and Fu-li Li, “Enhancing strength and range of atom- atom interaction in a coupled-cavity array via parametric drives,” Physical Review A 108, 033717 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Interactions mediated by atoms, photons, electrons, and excitons,

    Rosario Paredes, Georg Bruun, and Ar- turo Camacho-Guardian, “Interactions mediated by atoms, photons, electrons, and excitons,” Phys. Rev. A 110, 030101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Mul- timode photon blockade,

    Srivatsan Chakram, Kevin He, Akash V Dixit, Andrew E Oriani, Ravi K Naik, Nelson Leung, Hyeokshin Kwon, Wen-Long Ma, Liang Jiang, and David I Schuster, “Mul- timode photon blockade,” Nature Physics 18, 879–884 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Phases, instabilities and excitations in a two-component lattice model with photon-mediated interactions,

    Leon Carl, Rodrigo Rosa-Medina, Sebastian D Huber, Tilman Esslinger, Nishant Dogra, and Tena Dubcek, “Phases, instabilities and excitations in a two-component lattice model with photon-mediated interactions,” Phys- ical Review Research 5, L032003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    A photon–photon quantum gate based on rydberg interactions,

    Daniel Tiarks, Steffen Schmidt-Eberle, Thomas Stolz, Gerhard Rempe, and Stephan D¨ urr, “A photon–photon quantum gate based on rydberg interactions,” Nature Physics 15, 124–126 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Cavity-mediated collective spin-exchange interac- tions in a strontium superradiant laser,

    Matthew A Norcia, Robert J Lewis-Swan, Julia RK Cline, Bihui Zhu, Ana M Rey, and James K Thomp- son, “Cavity-mediated collective spin-exchange interac- tions in a strontium superradiant laser,” Science 361, 259–262 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Chiral inter- action induced near-perfect photon blockade,

    Zhi-Guang Lu, Ying Wu, and Xin-You L¨ u, “Chiral inter- action induced near-perfect photon blockade,” Physical Review Letters 134, 013602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Scalable photonic quan- tum technologies,

    Hui Wang, Timothy C Ralph, Jelmer J Renema, Chao- Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan, “Scalable photonic quan- tum technologies,” Nature Materials , 1–15 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Tunable multipho- ton bundles emission in a kerr-type two-photon jaynes- cummings model,

    Jing Tang and Yuangang Deng, “Tunable multipho- ton bundles emission in a kerr-type two-photon jaynes- cummings model,” Physical Review Research 6, 033247 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    The- ory of frequency-filtered and time-resolved n-photon cor- relations,

    Elena del Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez-Tudela, Fabrice P Laussy, Carlos Tejedor, and Michael J Hartmann, “The- ory of frequency-filtered and time-resolved n-photon cor- relations,” Physical review letters 109, 183601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    Nonreciprocal photon blockade,

    Ran Huang, Adam Miranowicz, Jie-Qiao Liao, Franco Nori, and Hui Jing, “Nonreciprocal photon blockade,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 153601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Deterministic down-converter and continu- ous photon-pair source within the bad-cavity limit,

    Yue Chang, Alejandro Gonz´ alez-Tudela, Carlos S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, Carlos Navarrete-Benlloch, and Tao Shi, “Deterministic down-converter and continu- ous photon-pair source within the bad-cavity limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 203602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  62. [62]

    Three- dimensional roton excitations and supersolid forma- tion in rydberg-excited bose-einstein condensates,

    N. Henkel, R. Nath, and T. Pohl, “Three- dimensional roton excitations and supersolid forma- tion in rydberg-excited bose-einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 195302 (2010)

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    High-fidelity entanglement and detec- tion of alkaline-earth rydberg atoms,

    Ivaylo S Madjarov, Jacob P Covey, Adam L Shaw, Joonhee Choi, Anant Kale, Alexandre Cooper, Hannes Pichler, Vladimir Schkolnik, Jason R Williams, and Manuel Endres, “High-fidelity entanglement and detec- tion of alkaline-earth rydberg atoms,” Nature Physics 16, 857–861 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Synthetic dimensions and spin-orbit coupling with an optical clock transition,

    L. F. Livi, G. Cappellini, M. Diem, L. Franchi, C. Cli- vati, M. Frittelli, F. Levi, D. Calonico, J. Catani, M. Inguscio, and L. Fallani, “Synthetic dimensions and spin-orbit coupling with an optical clock transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 220401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    Spin-orbit-coupled fermions in an optical lattice clock,

    S Kolkowitz, SL Bromley, T Bothwell, ML Wall, GE Marti, AP Koller, X Zhang, AM Rey, and J Ye, “Spin-orbit-coupled fermions in an optical lattice clock, ” Nature 542, 66 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    Magneti- cally induced optical transparency on a forbidden tran- sition in strontium for cavity-enhanced spectroscopy,

    Matthew N. Winchester, Matthew A. Norcia, Julia R. K. Cline, and James K. Thompson, “Magneti- cally induced optical transparency on a forbidden tran- sition in strontium for cavity-enhanced spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 263601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    Dynamics of interacting fermions under spin-orbit cou- pling in an optical lattice clock,

    SL Bromley, S Kolkowitz, T Bothwell, D Kedar, A Safavi- Naini, ML Wall, C Salomon, AM Rey, and J Ye, “Dynamics of interacting fermions under spin-orbit cou- pling in an optical lattice clock,” Nature Physics 14, 399 (2018)

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    High coop- erativity using a confocal-cavity–qed microscope,

    Ronen M Kroeze, Brendan P Marsh, Kuan-Yu Lin, Jonathan Keeling, and Benjamin L Lev, “High coop- erativity using a confocal-cavity–qed microscope,” PRX Quantum 4, 020326 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Light-mediated strong coupling between a mechanical oscillator and atomic spins 1 meter apart,

    Thomas M Karg, Baptiste Gouraud, Chun Tat Ngai, Gian-Luca Schmid, Klemens Hammerer, and Philipp Treutlein, “Light-mediated strong coupling between a mechanical oscillator and atomic spins 1 meter apart,” Science 369, 174–179 (2020)

    work page 2020

  70. [70]

    Single-mode squeezed-light generation and tomography with an integrated optical parametric oscillator,

    Taewon Park, Hubert Stokowski, Vahid Ansari, Samuel Gyger, Kevin KS Multani, Oguz Tolga Celik, Alexan- der Y Hwang, Devin J Dean, Felix Mayor, Timothy P McKenna, et al. , “Single-mode squeezed-light generation and tomography with an integrated optical parametric oscillator,” Science Advances 10, eadl1814 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Supersolid for- mation in a quantum gas breaking a continuous transla- tional symmetry,

    Julian L´ eonard, Andrea Morales, Philip Zupancic, Tilman Esslinger, and Tobias Donner, “Supersolid for- mation in a quantum gas breaking a continuous transla- tional symmetry,” Nature 543, 87 (2017). 13

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Nonclas- sical correlated deterministic single-photon pairs for a trapped atom in bimodal cavities,

    Zhong Peng and Yuangang Deng, “Nonclas- sical correlated deterministic single-photon pairs for a trapped atom in bimodal cavities,” Phys. Rev. A 105, 043711 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Quantum interference in het- erogeneous superconducting-photonic circuits on a silico n chip,

    Carsten Schuck, Xiang Guo, Linran Fan, X Ma, Menno Poot, and Hong X Tang, “Quantum interference in het- erogeneous superconducting-photonic circuits on a silico n chip,” Nature communications 7, 10352 (2016)

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    Pro- grammable quantum emitter formation in silicon,

    Kaushalya Jhuria, Vsevolod Ivanov, Debanjan Polley, Y Zhiyenbayev, Wei Liu, Arun Persaud, Walid Redjem, Wayesh Qarony, Prabin Parajuli, Qing Ji, et al. , “Pro- grammable quantum emitter formation in silicon,” Na- ture Communications 15, 4497 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator,

    Sepehr Ebadi, Tout T Wang, Harry Levine, Alexan- der Keesling, Giulia Semeghini, Ahmed Omran, Dolev Bluvstein, Rhine Samajdar, Hannes Pichler, Wen Wei Ho, et al. , “Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator,” Nature 595, 227–232 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    Synthetic gauge fields in a single optomechanical resonator,

    Yuan Chen, Yan-Lei Zhang, Zhen Shen, Chang-Ling Zou, Guang-Can Guo, and Chun-Hua Dong, “Synthetic gauge fields in a single optomechanical resonator,” Physical re- view letters 126, 123603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    Programmable high-dimensional hamiltonian in a photonic waveguide array,

    Yang Yang, Robert J Chapman, Ben Haylock, Francesco Lenzini, Yogesh N Joglekar, Mirko Lobino, and Alberto Peruzzo, “Programmable high-dimensional hamiltonian in a photonic waveguide array,” Nature Communications 15, 50 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits,

    Ali W Elshaari, Wolfram Pernice, Kartik Srinivasan, Oliver Benson, and Val Zwiller, “Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits,” Nature photonics 14, 285– 298 (2020)

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Integrated photonic quantum tech- nologies,

    Jianwei Wang, Fabio Sciarrino, Anthony Laing, and Mark G Thompson, “Integrated photonic quantum tech- nologies,” Nature photonics 14, 273–284 (2020)

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    Recent progress in quantum photonic chips for quantum communication and internet,

    Wei Luo, Lin Cao, Yuzhi Shi, Lingxiao Wan, Hui Zhang, Shuyi Li, Guanyu Chen, Yuan Li, Sijin Li, Yunxiang Wang, et al., “Recent progress in quantum photonic chips for quantum communication and internet,” Light: Sci- ence & Applications 12, 175 (2023)

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.