arxiv: 2604.15831 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 💻 cs.CR · cs.NI

Recognition: unknown

A Protocol-Agnostic Backscatter-Based Security Layer for Ultra-Low-Power SWIPT IoT Networks

Taki Eddine Djidjekh (INSA Toulouse , LAAS-MINC) , Alexandru Takacs (LAAS-MINC , EPE UT) , Ga\"el Loubet (INSA Toulouse , Lamoussa Sanogo (LAAS-MINC , INSA Toulouse) , Daniela Dragomirescu (INSA Toulouse

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CR cs.NI

keywords approachidentificationpowerproposedsecuresecurityauthenticationautonomy

0 comments

The pith

A rectifier-driven backscatter scheme adds protocol-independent device authentication to ultra-low-power SWIPT IoT nodes with negligible effect on energy autonomy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The work targets Internet of Things devices that harvest power from radio waves while also receiving data. These nodes are often too small for batteries and must avoid using their main radio chip for security checks because that drains the tiny harvested energy. The authors embed a simple backscatter circuit driven by the existing rectifier. When a reader sends a challenge, the node reflects a modulated signal that encodes its identity without activating the full transceiver. This layer sits on top of any existing protocol such as LoRaWAN and does not change the protocol messages. The team tested the idea by emulating replay attacks on standard LoRaWAN ABP encryption to show the vulnerability it addresses, then built real battery-free nodes with compact antennas and measured both harvested power and successful identification in a wireless sensor network. Results indicate the added circuit does not measurably shorten the time the node can operate on harvested energy.

Core claim

The proposed approach achieves secure identification, reliable energy harvesting, and data transmission with negligible impact on node autonomy while operating independently of communication protocols.

Load-bearing premise

That a rectifier-driven backscattering scheme can be embedded with only minimal hardware modification and will continue to provide reliable authentication and energy harvesting when deployed in real, interference-prone environments without post-hoc tuning.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15831 by Alexandru Takacs (LAAS-MINC, Daniela Dragomirescu (INSA Toulouse, EPE UT), Ga\"el Loubet (INSA Toulouse, INSA Toulouse), LAAS-MINC), Lamoussa Sanogo (LAAS-MINC, Taki Eddine Djidjekh (INSA Toulouse.

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Under normal conditions with the gate-to-source voltage (VGS) at 0 V, the BR achieves optimal impedance matching with the antenna port, enabling efficient energy harvesting. When activated by the microcontroller unit (MCU) via a GPIO pin, the MOSFET's effective ON-resistance is altered, disrupting this impedance match and reflecting the incoming RF power wave. By dynamically modulating VGS via a PvK, the c… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: LoRa transceiver serial interface displaying captured frame (left) and gateway ChirpStack network application with original and duplicated frames (right). Replay Attack using the HackRF SDR, as presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: The original RF rectifier was disabled, and the BR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: Schematic diagram of replay attack countering with WPTbased security framework. However, the system remains vulnerable to advanced replay attacks where an attacker could capture and replay the PvK waveform to impersonate a legitimate device. To address this, strategies such as Public Key frequency-hopping and dual-key modulation (described in Section II-B) introduce randomness and real-time signal variat… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

This paper presents a lightweight, protocol-agnostic security enhancement for Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT) in Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Building on a backscatter-based identification mechanism, the proposed approach introduces a secure, energy-efficient layer that operates independently of communication protocols and with minimal hardware modification. A rectifier-driven backscattering scheme embedded in battery-free sensing nodes enables authentication without activating conventional RF transceivers, thereby reducing power consumption while ensuring secure device identification. To assess robustness, replay attacks are emulated on standard LoRaWAN Activation By Personalization (ABP) encryption, highlighting vulnerabilities and demonstrating the relevance of the proposed solution. The approach is experimentally validated in a real Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) using LoRaWAN-compatible, battery-free sensing nodes equipped with compact, low-profile antennas, confirming both practicality and scalability for space-constrained IoT deployments. Results show that the method achieves secure identification, reliable energy harvesting, and data transmission with negligible impact on node autonomy. The proposed approach offers a practical, energy-efficient, and scalable security framework for SWIPT-enabled IoT systems, strengthening device authentication without altering existing communication protocols or compromising power autonomy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows a rectifier-driven backscatter layer for adding authentication to battery-free SWIPT nodes without protocol changes, but the results stay at the level of claims rather than measured data.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work takes established backscatter and SWIPT ideas and ties them together at the rectifier to create a protocol-agnostic authentication step that avoids waking the main transceiver. That keeps the power draw low for nodes that harvest energy instead of using batteries. They test the idea on actual LoRaWAN ABP nodes with compact antennas in a wireless sensor network setup, and they use replay-attack emulation to illustrate why standard encryption alone falls short. Those choices make the hardware angle concrete and show the approach can fit existing deployments without rewriting the communication stack. The experimental validation on real battery-free nodes is the part that gives the work some grounding beyond theory. The soft spot is the missing numbers. The abstract and description state that the method delivers secure identification, reliable harvesting, and negligible impact on autonomy, yet no success rates, power measurements, error bars, or interference tests appear. Without those details or hardware schematics, it is difficult to judge how well the scheme holds up when nodes are spaced out, when multipath or other transmitters are present, or when no post-deployment tuning is allowed. The claim of minimal hardware modification is asserted but not quantified against a baseline. This paper is for engineers and researchers who build or secure low-power SWIPT IoT systems, especially those dealing with industrial sensing or dense deployments where every microwatt matters. A reader who wants a practical hardware sketch for adding lightweight authentication could extract useful implementation pointers, even if the performance data needs filling in. It deserves peer review. The core construction is straightforward and builds on known techniques in a targeted way, but referees would need to require quantitative results and robustness checks before any stronger claims could stand.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a lightweight, protocol-agnostic security enhancement for SWIPT in IoT applications. It proposes a rectifier-driven backscattering scheme embedded in battery-free sensing nodes to enable secure authentication without activating conventional RF transceivers, thereby reducing power consumption. The approach is experimentally validated on LoRaWAN ABP nodes in a real WSN using compact antennas, with replay attacks emulated to highlight vulnerabilities; results are claimed to show secure identification, reliable energy harvesting, data transmission, and negligible impact on node autonomy while operating independently of communication protocols.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold with supporting quantitative evidence, the work could provide a practical, energy-efficient security layer for ultra-low-power SWIPT IoT systems that preserves protocol compatibility and node autonomy. The integration of backscatter for both identification and harvesting in space-constrained, battery-free deployments addresses a relevant challenge in IoT security and energy management.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'Results show that the method achieves secure identification, reliable energy harvesting, and data transmission with negligible impact on node autonomy' is unsupported by any quantitative data, error bars, statistical tests, power measurements, success rates, or hardware schematics. This is load-bearing for the central assertions of practicality, scalability, and negligible autonomy impact.
[Experimental Validation] Robustness and Experimental Validation sections: No details are provided on test conditions (e.g., interference levels, multipath, node density) or performance under perturbation, nor explicit checks that the scheme requires no post-deployment tuning. This directly affects the protocol-agnostic and reliable-operation claims in real WSN environments.

minor comments (2)

The description of the rectifier-driven backscattering mechanism would benefit from a clearer block diagram or circuit-level explanation of the minimal hardware modifications.
Consider including a table comparing power consumption, authentication latency, and security properties against baseline LoRaWAN and other SWIPT security approaches.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. We address the major comments point by point below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'Results show that the method achieves secure identification, reliable energy harvesting, and data transmission with negligible impact on node autonomy' is unsupported by any quantitative data, error bars, statistical tests, power measurements, success rates, or hardware schematics. This is load-bearing for the central assertions of practicality, scalability, and negligible autonomy impact.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by explicit quantitative support. The Experimental Validation section of the manuscript contains the supporting measurements (power consumption, identification success rates, and energy harvesting efficiency), but these are not summarized numerically in the abstract. In the revised version we will update the abstract to include concise quantitative statements drawn directly from the experimental results (e.g., measured power overhead, success rate, and autonomy impact) together with references to the relevant figures and tables. revision: yes
Referee: [Experimental Validation] Robustness and Experimental Validation sections: No details are provided on test conditions (e.g., interference levels, multipath, node density) or performance under perturbation, nor explicit checks that the scheme requires no post-deployment tuning. This directly affects the protocol-agnostic and reliable-operation claims in real WSN environments.

Authors: We acknowledge that additional environmental and operational details would improve transparency. The current manuscript describes the LoRaWAN ABP deployment in a real WSN but does not quantify interference, multipath, or node density. In the revision we will expand the Experimental Validation section with these specifics, report any observed performance under the tested conditions, and add an explicit statement (supported by the rectifier-level design) that no post-deployment tuning is required because the backscattering mechanism is protocol-independent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental system result with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents a hardware-based security layer using rectifier-driven backscattering for SWIPT IoT nodes, validated experimentally on LoRaWAN ABP devices. No mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or predictions appear in the provided abstract or described approach. Claims of protocol-agnostic operation, secure identification, and negligible autonomy impact rest directly on implementation details and test outcomes rather than reducing to self-referential inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes by construction. This is a standard non-circular experimental systems paper whose central assertions are externally falsifiable via replication of the described hardware setup.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard RF hardware assumptions rather than new mathematical constructs or fitted constants.

axioms (2)

domain assumption A rectifier-driven backscatter circuit can modulate and reflect an incoming signal to encode device identity without activating the main RF transceiver.
Invoked when describing the embedded authentication mechanism.
domain assumption The added backscatter hardware introduces negligible additional power draw relative to the harvested energy budget.
Required for the claim of negligible impact on node autonomy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1342 out tokens · 28528 ms · 2026-05-10T08:22:09.939744+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

[1]

A Comprehensive Study of Security of Internet-of-Things,

A. Mosenia and N. K. Jha, “A Comprehensive Study of Security of Internet-of-Things,” IEEE Trans. Emerg. Topics Comput., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 586–602, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1109/TETC.2016.2606384

work page doi:10.1109/tetc.2016.2606384 2017
[2]

Evaluating Security Principals and Technologies to Overcome Security Threats in IoT World,

J. Singh, G. Singh, and S. Negi, “Evaluating Security Principals and Technologies to Overcome Security Threats in IoT World,” in 2023 2nd International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC), Salem, India: I EEE, May 2023, pp. 1405 –

2023
[3]

doi: 10.1109/ICAAIC56838.2023.10141083

work page doi:10.1109/icaaic56838.2023.10141083 2023
[4]

Radiative Wireless Power Transfer: Where We Are and Where We Want to Go,

V. Palazzi et al., “Radiative Wireless Power Transfer: Where We Are and Where We Want to Go,” IEEE Microwave, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 57 – 79, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1109/MMM.2022.3210145

work page doi:10.1109/mmm.2022.3210145 2023
[5]

Wirelessly Powered Battery-Free Sensing Nodes for Internet of Things Applications,

G. Loubet et al., “Wirelessly Powered Battery-Free Sensing Nodes for Internet of Things Applications,” IEEE Microwave, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 26–46, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1109/MMM.2024.3488593

work page doi:10.1109/mmm.2024.3488593 2025
[6]

Investigation on Security Risk of LoRaWAN: Compatibility Scenarios,

S. Loukil, L. C. Fourati, A. Nayyar, and C. So -In, “Investigation on Security Risk of LoRaWAN: Compatibility Scenarios,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 101825 –101843, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3208171. 10

work page doi:10.1109/access.2022.3208171 2022
[7]

A Survey on the Security Challenges of Low -Power Wireless C ommunication Protocols for Communicating Concrete in Civil Engineerings,

G. Loubet, E. Alata, A. Takacs, and D. Dragomirescu, “A Survey on the Security Challenges of Low -Power Wireless C ommunication Protocols for Communicating Concrete in Civil Engineerings,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 1849, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23041849

work page doi:10.3390/s23041849 2023
[8]

Lightweight Cryptography: A Solution to Secure IoT,

S. S. Dhanda, B. Singh, and P. Jindal, “Lightweight Cryptography: A Solution to Secure IoT,” Wireless Pers Co mmun, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 1947–1980, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11277-020-07134-3

work page doi:10.1007/s11277-020-07134-3 1947
[9]

Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms for Resource-Constrained IoT Devices: A Review, Comparison and Research Opportu nities,

V. A. Thakor, M. A. Razzaque, and M. R. A. Khandaker, “Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms for Resource-Constrained IoT Devices: A Review, Comparison and Research Opportu nities,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 28177 –28193, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052867

work page doi:10.1109/access.2021.3052867 2021
[10]

Security on IoT devices with secure elements,

T. Schläpfer and A. Rüst, “Security on IoT devices with secure elements,” 2019, doi: 10.21256/ZHAW-3350

work page doi:10.21256/zhaw-3350 2019
[11]

Intrusio n detection systems for IoT-based smart environments: a survey,

M. F. Elrawy, A. I. Awad, and H. F. A. Hamed, “Intrusio n detection systems for IoT-based smart environments: a survey,” J Cloud Comp, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 21, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s13677-018-0123-6

work page doi:10.1186/s13677-018-0123-6 2018
[12]

A critical review of intrusion detection systems in the internet of things: tec hniques, deployment strategy, validation strategy, attacks, public datasets and challenges,

A. Khraisat and A. Alazab, “A critical review of intrusion detection systems in the internet of things: tec hniques, deployment strategy, validation strategy, attacks, public datasets and challenges,” Cybersecur, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 18, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s42400 -021- 00077-7

work page doi:10.1186/s42400 2021
[13]

A Survey on IoT Profiling, Fingerprinting, and Identification,

M. Safi, S. Dadkhah, F. Shoeleh, H. Mahdikhani, H. Molyneaux, and A. A. Ghorbani , “A Survey on IoT Profiling, Fingerprinting, and Identification,” ACM Trans. Internet Things, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1 –39, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3539736

work page doi:10.1145/3539736 2022
[14]

Autonomous Industrial IoT for Ci vil Engineering Structural Health Monitoring,

G. Loubet, A. Sidibe, P. Herail, A. Takacs, and D. Dragomirescu, “Autonomous Industrial IoT for Ci vil Engineering Structural Health Monitoring,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 8921 –8944, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3321958

work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3321958 2024
[15]

A Multifunctional Battery-Free Bluetooth Low Energ y Wireless Sensor Node Remotely Powered by Electromagnetic Wireless Power Transfer in Far -Field,

A. Sidibe, G. Loubet, A. Takacs, and D. Dragomirescu, “A Multifunctional Battery-Free Bluetooth Low Energ y Wireless Sensor Node Remotely Powered by Electromagnetic Wireless Power Transfer in Far -Field,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 11, p. 4054, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22114054

work page doi:10.3390/s22114054 2022
[16]

Power Splitting -Based SWIPT Systems With Full-Duplex Jamming,

R. Ma, H. Wu, J. Ou, S. Yang, and Y. Gao, “Power Splitting -Based SWIPT Systems With Full-Duplex Jamming,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 9822 –9836, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3002976

work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.3002976 2020
[17]

Secure mmWave UAV - Enabled SWIPT Networks Based on Random Frequency Diverse Arrays,

X. Sun, W. Yang, Y. Cai, and M. Wang, “Secure mmWave UAV - Enabled SWIPT Networks Based on Random Frequency Diverse Arrays,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 528 –540, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3005984

work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3005984 2021
[18]

Robust Secure Energy - Efficiency Optimization in SWIPT -Aided Heterogeneous Networks With a Nonlinear Energy-Harvesting Model,

Y. Xu, H. Xie, C. Liang, and F. R. Yu, “Robust Secure Energy - Efficiency Optimization in SWIPT -Aided Heterogeneous Networks With a Nonlinear Energy-Harvesting Model,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 19, pp. 14908 –14919, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3072965

work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3072965 2021
[19]

A Secure -Transmission Maximization Scheme for SWIPT Systems Assisted by an Intelligent Reflecting Surface and Deep Learning,

H. T. Thien, P. -V. Tuan, and I. Koo, “A Secure -Transmission Maximization Scheme for SWIPT Systems Assisted by an Intelligent Reflecting Surface and Deep Learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 31851–31867, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3159679

work page doi:10.1109/access.2022.3159679 2022
[20]

Secrecy Rate Optimization in Nonlinear Energy Harvesting Model-Based mmWave IoT Systems With SWIPT,

Z. Zhu et al., “Secrecy Rate Optimization in Nonlinear Energy Harvesting Model-Based mmWave IoT Systems With SWIPT,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 5939 –5949, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3147889

work page doi:10.1109/jsyst.2022.3147889 2022
[21]

Security Optimization for an AF MIMO Two -Way Relay -Assisted Cognitive Radio Nonorthogonal Multiple Access Networks With S WIPT,

C. Hu, Q. Li, Q. Zhang, and J. Qin, “Security Optimization for an AF MIMO Two -Way Relay -Assisted Cognitive Radio Nonorthogonal Multiple Access Networks With S WIPT,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 17, pp. 1481 –1496, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2022.3163842

work page doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3163842 2022
[22]

DS -SWIPT: Secure Communication with Wireless Power Transfer for Internet of Things,

P. Gong, T. M. Chen, P. Xu, and Q. Chen, “DS -SWIPT: Secure Communication with Wireless Power Transfer for Internet of Things,” Security and Communication Networks, vol. 2022, pp. 1 –11, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/2650474

work page doi:10.1155/2022/2650474 2022
[23]

Physical Layer Security in AF -Based Cooperative SWIPT Sensor Networks,

T. N. Nguyen et al., “Physical Layer Security in AF -Based Cooperative SWIPT Sensor Networks,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 689–705, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3224128

work page doi:10.1109/jsen.2022.3224128 2023
[24]

Physical Layer Security in Two - Way SWIPT Relay Networks with Imperfect CSI and a Friendly Jammer,

M. Hayajneh and T. A. Gulliver, “Physical Layer Security in Two - Way SWIPT Relay Networks with Imperfect CSI and a Friendly Jammer,” Entropy, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 122, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/e25010122

work page doi:10.3390/e25010122 2023
[25]

Deep Learning Methods for Secure IoT SWIPT Networks,

V. Ganapath y, R. Ramachandran, and T. Ohtsuki, “Deep Learning Methods for Secure IoT SWIPT Networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 19657 –19677, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3368692

work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3368692 2024
[26]

GRNN -based detection of eavesdropping attacks in SWIPT-enabled smart grid wireless sensor networks,

W. Jiang, J. Wang, K. -L. Hsiung, and H. -Y. Chen, “ GRNN-Based Detection of Eavesdropping Attacks in SWIPT -Enabled Smart Grid Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 22, pp. 37381 –37393, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3443277

work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3443277 2024
[27]

A New Security and Identification Concept for SWIPT Systems in IoT Applications,

T. E. Djidjekh, L. Sanogo, G. Loubet, A. Sidibé, D. Dragomirescu, and A. Takacs, “A New Security and Identification Concept for SWIPT Systems in IoT Applications,” in 2024 IEEE/MTT -S International Microwave Symposium - IMS 2024, Washington, DC, USA: IEEE, Jun. 2024, pp. 110 –113. doi: 10.1109/IMS40175.2024.10600312

work page doi:10.1109/ims40175.2024.10600312 2024
[28]

Backscattering Rectifier for Security and Identification in the context of Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer,

T. E. Djidjekh et al., “Backscattering Rectifier for Security and Identification in the context of Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer,” in 2024 54th European Microwave Conference (EuMC), Paris, France: IEEE, Sep. 2024, pp. 300 –303. doi: 10.23919/EuMC61614.2024.10732847

work page doi:10.23919/eumc61614.2024.10732847 2024
[29]

Analysis of Lorawan Protocol and Attacks Against Lorawan -Based IoT Devices,

A. Tepecik and A. F. Ağrak, “Analysis of Lorawan Protocol and Attacks Against Lorawan -Based IoT Devices,” ijamec, p. 2, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.58190/ijamec.2024.95

work page doi:10.58190/ijamec.2024.95 2024
[30]

Compact Antenna in 3D Configuration for Rectenna Wireless Power Transmission Applications,

A. Sidibe, A. Takacs, G. Loubet, and D. Dragomirescu, “Compact Antenna in 3D Configuration for Rectenna Wireless Power Transmission Applications,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 9, p. 3193, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21093193

work page doi:10.3390/s21093193 2021
[31]

Backsca ttering-Based Security in Wireless Power Transfer Applied to Battery -Free BLE Sensors,

T. E. Djidjekh, G. Loubet, and A. Takacs, “Backsca ttering-Based Security in Wireless Power Transfer Applied to Battery -Free BLE Sensors,” in 2025 IEEE Wireless Power Technology Conference and Expo (WPTCE), Jun. 2025, pp. 1 –4. doi: 10.1109/WPTCE62521.2025.11062233

work page doi:10.1109/wptce62521.2025.11062233 2025
[32]

Singl e-Ended Reconfigurable Wireless Power Harvesting and Harmonic Backscattering,

X. Gu, R. Khazaka, and K. Wu, “Singl e-Ended Reconfigurable Wireless Power Harvesting and Harmonic Backscattering,” in 2023 IEEE Wireless Power Technology Conference and Expo (WPTCE), San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE, Jun. 2023, pp. 1 –4. doi: 10.1109/WPTCE56855.2023.10215912

work page doi:10.1109/wptce56855.2023.10215912 2023
[33]

Energy-Efficient Harmonic Transponder Based on On -Off Keying Modulation for Both Identification and Sensing,

V. Palazzi, L. Rose lli, M. M. Tentzeris, P. Mezzanotte, and F. Alimenti, “Energy-Efficient Harmonic Transponder Based on On -Off Keying Modulation for Both Identification and Sensing,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 620, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22020620. Taki E. Djidjekh (Member, IEEE) was born in 1995 in Biskra, Algeria. He received the PhD degree in Elec...

work page doi:10.3390/s22020620 2022
[34]

degrees in microwave and optical communications from the National 11 Polytechnic Institute of Toulouse, France, in 2000 and 2004, respectively

He received the Engineer Diploma in electronic engineering from the Military Technical Academy, Bucharest, Romania, in 1999, and the master’s and Ph.D. degrees in microwave and optical communications from the National 11 Polytechnic Institute of Toulouse, France, in 2000 and 2004, respectively. From 2004 to 2007, he was a Lecturer with the Military Techni...

1999
[35]

student in the Internet of Things (IoT) physical layer security at the National Institute of Applied Sciences (INSA) of Toulouse, France, since February 2022

He is currently a Ph.D. student in the Internet of Things (IoT) physical layer security at the National Institute of Applied Sciences (INSA) of Toulouse, France, since February 2022. His research focuses on finding security solutions and countermeasures adapted to resource - constrained IoT devices . Currently, He is working mainly on a new message authen...

2022