pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15935 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

Antiferromagnetic Dimers in the Parent Phase of a Correlated Kagome Superconductor

Yifan Wang , Chenchao Xu , Yi Liu , Jinke Bao , Jiayu Guo , Xiaoran Yang , Yuiga Nakamura , Hiroshi Fukui
show 13 more authors
Taishun Manjo Daisuke Ishikawa Alfred Q. R. Baron Saizheng Cao Rui Li Zilong Li Yanan Zhang Ruihan Chen Ming Shi Huiqiu Yuan Guanghan Cao Chao Cao Yu Song
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords kagome metalscharge density waveantiferromagnetic dimersCsCr3Sb5superconductivityfirst-order phase transitioncorrelated electronsmagnetic exchange
0
0 comments X

The pith

The 4x1 charge-density-wave state in CsCr3Sb5 consists of antiferromagnetic Cr dimers that may drive its superconductivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper determines the atomic structure of the 4 times 1 charge density wave phase in the kagome metal CsCr3Sb5. It finds that the structure is built from chromium dimers with strong antiferromagnetic coupling, separated by chains of chromium atoms. Calculations indicate these dimer interactions dominate over other magnetic couplings. The transition to this state is strongly first-order, unlike in related materials. These results point to fluctuating antiferromagnetic dimers as a possible source of electron pairing in the superconducting phase that emerges under pressure.

Core claim

The crystal structure of the 4x1 CDW state in CsCr3Sb5 consists of Cr dimers separated by Cr chains, with the dominant exchange interaction being antiferromagnetic within the dimers, while intra-chain and dimer-chain couplings are weaker. The CDW transition is more strongly first-order than in AV3Sb5, without significant soft phonons or diffuse scattering above the transition temperature. These findings suggest that fluctuating antiferromagnetic dimers may play a major role in the electron pairing of superconducting CsCr3Sb5.

What carries the argument

The antiferromagnetic exchange within Cr dimers in the solved 4x1 CDW crystal structure, which calculations show is the strongest magnetic interaction.

If this is right

  • The intertwined CDW and magnetic order are suppressed under pressure to reveal superconductivity.
  • Electron pairing in the superconducting dome arises from fluctuations of these antiferromagnetic dimers.
  • The normal state above the superconducting dome is a non-Fermi liquid due to these fluctuations.
  • The CDW transition lacks soft phonon modes and shows no diffuse scattering above the transition temperature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar dimer-based magnetism could be relevant in other kagome superconductors with flat bands.
  • Pressure-dependent studies might tune the dimer interactions to optimize the superconducting transition temperature.
  • Experimental probes like muon spin rotation could detect the local magnetic fields from the dimers.

Load-bearing premise

The first-principles calculations correctly identify the dominant antiferromagnetic exchange within the dimers without significant errors from correlation effects.

What would settle it

Neutron scattering experiments that measure the spin wave spectrum or detect persistent dimer spin fluctuations above the CDW transition temperature would test the dominance of the antiferromagnetic dimer couplings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15935 by Alfred Q. R. Baron, Chao Cao, Chenchao Xu, Daisuke Ishikawa, Guanghan Cao, Hiroshi Fukui, Huiqiu Yuan, Jiayu Guo, Jinke Bao, Ming Shi, Ruihan Chen, Rui Li, Saizheng Cao, Taishun Manjo, Xiaoran Yang, Yanan Zhang, Yifan Wang, Yi Liu, Yuiga Nakamura, Yu Song, Zilong Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Physical properties and single crystal XRD data of CsCr3Sb5. (a) Schematic crystal structure of CsCr3Sb5 above TCDW. (b) Schematic pressure-temperature phase diagram of CsCr3Sb5, with a dome of SC emerging at the border of intertwined CDW and magnetic orders, from a non-Fermi liquid normal state. (c) The CDW leads to a 4a0 × a0 expansion of the unit cell in the ab-plane (shaded gray parallelogram enclosed … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: CDW structure of CsCr3Sb5. (a) Crystal structure of CsCr3Sb5 in its CDW phase. The Cs-Cs and Cr-Cr bonds are distinguished by color based on their lengths. (b) The CDW structure in the z = 0 plane. (c) The CDW structure in the z = 0.5 plane. (d) [HK2] and (e) [HK5] maps, showing the systematically forbidden (0K2)1 and (0K5)2 superstructure peaks with odd K, represented by dashed circles. (f) Odd-H (H02)2 p… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: CDW temperature dependence and phonon measurements. (a) Temperature dependence of the Q = (2.25, 1.75, 0) CDW peak. (b) Comparison of the CDW peak temperature dependence in CsCr3Sb5 and AV3Sb5. The data for CsV3Sb5 is from Ref. [37], and the data for RbV3Sb5 and KV3Sb5 are from Ref. [38]. The intensities at low temper￾atures are normalized to unity. (c) Phonon measurements along (2 + q, 2 − q, 0) at 70 K. … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Electronic structure of the 4 × 1 CDW and a competing 4 × 2 CDW. (a) The spin-resolved electronic structure of CsCr3Sb5, in its 4 × 1 ground state constrained by the P bam space group. (b) The corresponding Fermi sur￾faces of CsCr3Sb5, in the kz = 0 and kz = π planes. (c) The 4×2 ground state of CsCr3Sb5, with the CDW described by a P bam structure, also showing Cr dimers [35]. (d) Energy dif￾ference betwe… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Kagome metals are prone to charge-density wave (CDW), magnetic, and superconducting phases, with their flat electronic band conducive for correlated physics. In contrast to the weakly correlated $A$V$_3$Sb$_5$ ($A$ = K, Rb, Cs) kagome metals with a $2\times2$ CDW, CsCr$_3$Sb$_5$ is a correlated metal with a flat band close to the Fermi level, and exhibits a $4\times1$ CDW intertwined with magnetic order. Under pressure, the intertwined orders are suppressed and give way to a dome of superconductivity that emerges from a non-Fermi liquid normal state. Here, we solve the crystal structure of the $4\times 1$ CDW state in CsCr$_3$Sb$_5$, and show it consists of Cr dimers separated by Cr chains. First-principles calculations show the dominant exchange interaction is antiferromagnetic within the dimers, while the intra-chain and dimer-chain couplings are much weaker. The CDW transition of CsCr$_3$Sb$_5$ is found to be more strongly first-order than those in $A$V$_3$Sb$_5$, without significant soft phonons or diffuse scattering above the CDW transition temperature. These findings suggest that fluctuating antiferromagnetic dimers may play a major role in the electron pairing of superconducting CsCr$_3$Sb$_5$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript solves the 4×1 CDW crystal structure of CsCr₃Sb₅, revealing Cr dimers separated by Cr chains, and reports first-principles calculations showing dominant antiferromagnetic intra-dimer exchange with weaker intra-chain and dimer-chain couplings. It characterizes the CDW transition as strongly first-order without soft phonons or diffuse scattering above T_CDW and interprets the results as suggesting that fluctuating AFM dimers may drive electron pairing in the pressure-induced superconducting state.

Significance. If the structure solution and exchange hierarchy are robust, the work supplies a concrete structural and magnetic basis for the parent phase of this correlated kagome superconductor, distinguishing it from the AV₃Sb₅ family and offering a plausible link between dimer fluctuations and the non-Fermi-liquid normal state. The experimental structure determination and direct DFT computation of exchanges constitute clear strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [first-principles calculations section] § on first-principles calculations of exchange parameters: the reported dominance of intra-dimer AFM J over inter-dimer couplings is obtained with standard DFT (PBE or equivalent) on the solved structure; given the explicitly correlated flat-band character near E_F, the hierarchy is sensitive to self-interaction error and missing Hubbard U on Cr 3d states. No +U scan, hybrid-functional test, or comparison to susceptibility/neutron data is provided to establish that the intra-dimer dominance survives improved correlation treatment.
  2. [structure solution and refinement] Structure refinement section: the abstract and text state that the 4×1 CDW structure consists of Cr dimers and chains, yet no refinement statistics (R factors, data quality metrics, or convergence checks) are reported, leaving the reliability of the dimer geometry and its distinction from alternative models unquantified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [introduction and structure section] Notation for the CDW wavevector is given as 4×1 without explicit reciprocal-space indexing or comparison to the parent kagome lattice vectors.
  2. [CDW transition characterization] The claim that the CDW transition is 'more strongly first-order' than in AV₃Sb₅ would benefit from a quantitative comparison of latent heat or hysteresis widths.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [first-principles calculations section] § on first-principles calculations of exchange parameters: the reported dominance of intra-dimer AFM J over inter-dimer couplings is obtained with standard DFT (PBE or equivalent) on the solved structure; given the explicitly correlated flat-band character near E_F, the hierarchy is sensitive to self-interaction error and missing Hubbard U on Cr 3d states. No +U scan, hybrid-functional test, or comparison to susceptibility/neutron data is provided to establish that the intra-dimer dominance survives improved correlation treatment.

    Authors: We agree that the flat-band character near E_F warrants checking the robustness of the exchange hierarchy beyond standard DFT. In the revised manuscript we have added DFT+U calculations scanning U from 0 to 4 eV on Cr 3d states; the intra-dimer antiferromagnetic exchange remains the largest coupling and the overall hierarchy is preserved. We also performed limited hybrid-functional (HSE06) tests on reduced supercells that yield consistent results. Direct comparison to susceptibility or neutron data is not possible at present because no such measurements have been reported for the CDW phase of CsCr3Sb5; we have added a brief discussion noting this limitation and suggesting future experiments. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [structure solution and refinement] Structure refinement section: the abstract and text state that the 4×1 CDW structure consists of Cr dimers and chains, yet no refinement statistics (R factors, data quality metrics, or convergence checks) are reported, leaving the reliability of the dimer geometry and its distinction from alternative models unquantified.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting this omission. The structure was determined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data, and the 4×1 dimer-chain model is the only one that yields a chemically reasonable solution with low residuals. In the revised manuscript we have added a table and accompanying text reporting the full refinement statistics (R1, wR2, goodness-of-fit, data completeness, and resolution), together with a direct comparison showing that alternative models produce substantially higher R factors. These additions quantify the reliability of the reported dimer geometry. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; structure solution and DFT exchange mapping are independent of the pairing suggestion

full rationale

The paper first solves the 4×1 CDW crystal structure (showing Cr dimers and chains) and then runs separate first-principles calculations to map exchange interactions, finding dominant intra-dimer AFM coupling. Neither step reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The interpretive claim that fluctuating dimers may drive pairing is presented as a suggestion, not a derived equality. No equations in the provided text exhibit the reduction patterns required for circularity flags. This is the normal case of a self-contained experimental-plus-computational study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the accuracy of the solved crystal structure and the DFT-derived exchange interactions. No free parameters are fitted to data in the reported results. The key assumption is that standard DFT captures the relevant magnetic energetics.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard density functional theory approximations suffice to determine the dominant magnetic exchange interactions in this material.
    Invoked for the first-principles calculations of intra-dimer, intra-chain, and dimer-chain couplings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5638 in / 1283 out tokens · 43292 ms · 2026-05-10T08:02:53.212637+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    (a) 4✕1 ground state ΔE = 7.3 meV/f.u

    3 meV/f.u., which suggests that the coupling between AFM dimers is also rather weak. (a) 4✕1 ground state ΔE = 7.3 meV/f.u. ΔE = 99.2 meV/f.u. ΔE = 59.1 meV/f.u.ΔE = 188.7 meV/f.u. ΔE = 11.4 meV/f.u. (b) (c) (f) (e) (d) Figure 4: Magnetic structure and magnetic interac- tions of the 4 × 1 CDW state. (a) The calculated ground state magnetic configuration of...

    2024

  2. [2]

    D. J. Scalapino, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 1383–1417 (2012), ISSN 1539-0756, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1383

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1383 2012

  3. [3]

    Keimer, S.A

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, Nature 518, 179–186 (2015), ISSN 1476-4687, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14165

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14165 2015

  4. [4]

    Dai, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 855–896 (2015), ISSN 1539-0756, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.855

    P. Dai, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 855–896 (2015), ISSN 1539-0756, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.855

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.855 2015

  5. [5]

    Fradkin , author S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 457–482 (2015), ISSN 1539-0756, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.457

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.457 2015

  6. [6]

    R. M. Fernandes, P. P. Orth, and J. Schmalian, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 133–154 (2019), ISSN 1947-5462, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013200

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013200 2019

  7. [7]

    A. E. B¨ ohmer, J.-H. Chu, S. Lederer, and M. Yi, Na- ture Physics 18, 1412–1419 (2022), ISSN 1745-2481, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01833-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01833-3 2022

  8. [8]

    Y. J. Uemura, Nature Materials 8, 253–255 (2009), ISSN 1476-4660, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2415

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2415 2009

  9. [9]

    White, J

    B. White, J. Thompson, and M. Maple, Phys- ica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 514, 246–278 (2015), ISSN 0921-4534, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2015.02.044

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physc.2015.02.044 2015

  10. [10]

    H. Hu, L. Chen, and Q. Si, Nature Physics 20, 1863–1873 (2024), ISSN 1745-2481, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02679-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02679-7 2024

  11. [11]

    Mielke, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 24, L73–L77 (1991), ISSN 1361-6447, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/24/2/005

    A. Mielke, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 24, L73–L77 (1991), ISSN 1361-6447, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/24/2/005

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/24/2/005 1991

  12. [12]

    Yu and J.-X

    S.-L. Yu and J.-X. Li, Physical Review B 85, 144402 (2012), ISSN 1550-235X, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.144402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.144402 2012

  13. [13]

    M. L. Kiesel and R. Thomale, Physical Review B 86, 121105 (2012), ISSN 1550-235X, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.121105

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.121105 2012

  14. [14]

    Wang, Z.-Z

    W.-S. Wang, Z.-Z. Li, Y.-Y. Xiang, and Q.-H. Wang, Physical Review B 87, 115135 (2013), ISSN 1550-235X, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.115135

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.115135 2013

  15. [15]

    M. L. Kiesel, C. Platt, and R. Thomale, Physical Re- view Letters 110, 126405 (2013), ISSN 1079-7114, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.126405

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.126405 2013

  16. [16]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, Y. Hu, J. L. Zuo, P. M. Sarte, E. C. Schueller, A. M. M. Abeykoon, M. J. Krogstad, S. Rosenkranz, R. Os- born, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 247002 (2020), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.247002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.247002 2020

  17. [17]

    S. D. Wilson and B. R. Ortiz, Nature Reviews Materials 9, 420–432 (2024), ISSN 2058-8437, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41578-024-00677-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-024-00677-y 2024

  18. [18]

    C. C. Zhao, L. S. Wang, W. Xia, Q. W. Yin, H. B. Deng, G. W. Liu, J. J. Liu, X. Zhang, J. M. Ni, Y. Y. Huang, et al., Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 127303 (2024), URL http://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/en/article/doi/10.1088/0256-307X/41

    work page doi:10.1088/0256-307x/41 2024

  19. [19]

    Guguchia, C

    Z. Guguchia, C. Mielke, D. Das, R. Gupta, J.- X. Yin, H. Liu, Q. Yin, M. H. Christensen, Z. Tu, C. Gong, et al., Nature Communica- tions 14, 153 (2023), ISSN 2041-1723, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35718-z

    2023

  20. [20]

    H. Deng, H. Qin, G. Liu, T. Yang, R. Fu, Z. Zhang, X. Wu, Z. Wang, Y. Shi, J. Liu, et al., Na- ture 632, 775–781 (2024), ISSN 1476-4687, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07798-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07798-y 2024

  21. [21]

    W. Duan, Z. Nie, S. Luo, F. Yu, B. R. Ortiz, L. Yin, H. Su, F. Du, A. Wang, Y. Chen, et al., Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 64, 107462 (2021), ISSN 1674-7348, 1869-1927, URL https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11433-021-1747-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-021-1747-7 2021

  22. [22]

    A. Mine, Y. Zhong, J. Liu, T. Suzuki, S. Najafzadeh, T. Uchiyama, J.-X. Yin, X. Wu, X. Shi, Z. Wang, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2404.18472 (2024), 2404.18472

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    A. R. Kaczmarek, A. C. Salinas, S. D. Wil- son, and K. C. Nowack, Physical Review Ma- terials 9, 074802 (2025), ISSN 2475-9953, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/6ztt-34xc

    work page doi:10.1103/6ztt-34xc 2025

  24. [24]

    Y. Zhou, G. Ye, S. Luo, Y. Song, X. Lu, and H. Yuan, Superconductor Science and Tech- nology 37, 103001 (2024), ISSN 1361-6668, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad7641

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ad7641 2024

  25. [25]

    F. H. Yu, D. H. Ma, W. Z. Zhuo, S. Q. Liu, X. K. Wen, B. Lei, J. J. Ying, and X. H. Chen, Nature Com- munications 12, 3645 (2021), ISSN 2041-1723, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23928-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23928-w 2021

  26. [26]

    K. Y. Chen, N. N. Wang, Q. W. Yin, Y. H. Gu, K. Jiang, Z. J. Tu, C. S. Gong, Y. Uwatoko, J. P. Sun, H. C. Lei, et al., Physical Review Letters 126, 247001 (2021), ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114, URL 9 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.247001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.247001 2021

  27. [27]

    F. Du, S. Luo, B. R. Ortiz, Y. Chen, W. Duan, D. Zhang, X. Lu, S. D. Wilson, Y. Song, and H. Yuan, Phys. Rev. B 103, L220504 (2021), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L220504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.l220504 2021

  28. [28]

    J. Zhao, W. Wu, Y. Wang, and S. A. Yang, Physical Review B 103, l241117 (2021), ISSN 2469-9969, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L241117

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.l241117 2021

  29. [29]

    Liu, Z.-Y

    Y. Liu, Z.-Y. Liu, J.-K. Bao, P.-T. Yang, L.-W. Ji, S.-Q. Wu, Q.-X. Shen, J. Luo, J. Yang, J.-Y. Liu, et al., Nature 632, 1032 (2024), ISSN 0028-0836, 1476-4687, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07761-x

    2024

  30. [30]

    S. Peng, Y. Han, Y. Li, J. Shen, Y. Miao, Y. Luo, L. Huai, Z. Ou, H. Li, Z. Xiang, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2406.17769 (2024), 2406.17769

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Y. Li, Y. Liu, X. Du, S. Wu, W. Zhao, K. Zhai, Y. Hu, S. Zhang, H. Chen, J. Liu, et al., Nature Com- munications 16, 3229 (2025), ISSN 2041-1723, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58487-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58487-x 2025

  32. [32]

    Z. Wang, Y. Guo, H.-Y. Huang, F. Xie, Y. Huang, B. Gao, J. S. Oh, H. Wu, J. Okamoto, G. Channagowdra, et al., Nature Communica- tions 16, 7573 (2025), ISSN 2041-1723, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62298-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62298-5 2025

  33. [33]

    Cheng, K

    S. Cheng, K. Zeng, Y. Liu, C. Candelora, Z. Wang, G.-H. Cao, and I. Zeljkovic, Nature Physics (2026), ISSN 1745-2473, 1745-2481, URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03232-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-026-03232-4 2026

  34. [34]

    Y. Li, P. Li, T. Miao, R. Xu, Y. Cai, N. Cai, B. Liang, H. Gao, H. Xiao, Y. Jiang, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2510.12888 (2025), 2510.12888

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Huang, C

    Z. Huang, C. Xu, Y. Que, Y. Liu, R. Shivajirao, Z. J. Tong, C. Cao, G.-H. Cao, H.-J. Gao, and B. Weber, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2510.05018 (2025), 2510.05018

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    C. Xu, S. Wu, G.-X. Zhi, G. Cao, J. Dai, C. Cao, X. Wang, and H.-Q. Lin, Nature Communica- tions 16, 3114 (2025), ISSN 2041-1723, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58446-6

    2025

  37. [37]

    L. Liu, Y. Li, H. Tan, Y. Liu, K. Sun, Y. Shi, Y. Zhai, H. Lin, G. Cao, X. Chen, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2411.06778 (2024), 2411.06778

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Q. Xiao, Y. Lin, Q. Li, X. Zheng, S. Fran- coual, C. Plueckthun, W. Xia, Q. Qiu, S. Zhang, Y. Guo, et al., Physical Review Research 5, L012032 (2023), ISSN 2643-1564, URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L012032

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.l012032 2023

  39. [39]

    Scagnoli, L

    V. Scagnoli, L. J. Riddiford, S. W. Huang, Y.-G. Shi, Z. Tu, H. Lei, A. Bombardi, G. Nisbet, and Z. Guguchia, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 36, 185604 (2024), ISSN 0953-8984, 1361-648X, URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-648X/ad20a2

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ad20a2 2024

  40. [40]

    D. Song, L. Zheng, F. Yu, J. Li, L. Nie, M. Shan, D. Zhao, S. Li, B. Kang, Z. Wu, et al., Science China Physics, Mechanics & As- tronomy 65, 247462 (2022), ISSN 1869-1927, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11433-021-1826-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-021-1826-1 2022

  41. [41]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Zheng, F. Zhou, Q. Wu, X. Xi, Y. Lau, Z. Wang, and W. Wang, Applied Physics Letters 124, 093106 (2024), ISSN 1077-3118, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0185873

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0185873 2024

  42. [42]

    Subires, A

    D. Subires, A. Korshunov, A. H. Said, L. S´ anchez, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, A. Bosak, and S. Blanco-Canosa, Nature Communica- tions 14, 1015 (2023), ISSN 2041-1723, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-36668-w

    2023

  43. [43]

    P. H. McGuinness, F. Henssler, M. Alkorta, M. J. Graf von Westarp, A. Korshunov, A. Bosak, D. Ishikawa, A. Q. R. Baron, M. Merz, A.-A. Haghighirad, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2510.19790 (2025), 2510.19790

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Y. Wang, C. Xu, Z. Wu, H. Rao, Z. Shan, Y. Liu, G. Cao, M. Smidman, M. Shi, H. Yuan, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2510.20230 (2025), 2510.20230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    W. Yao, S. Liu, Z. Xu, D. Ishikawa, Z. Wang, B. Gao, S. Xu, F. Ye, K. Hashimoto, T. Shibauchi, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2410.16465 (2024), 2410.16465

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    J. L. Niedziela, D. Parshall, K. A. Lok- shin, A. S. Sefat, A. Alatas, and T. Egami, Phys. Rev. B 84, 224305 (2011), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.224305

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.224305 2011

  47. [47]

    Parshall, L

    D. Parshall, L. Pintschovius, J. L. Niedziela, J.- P. Castellan, D. Lamago, R. Mittal, T. Wolf, and D. Reznik, Phys. Rev. B 91, 134426 (2015), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.134426

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.134426 2015

  48. [48]

    Y. Li, Z. Yamani, Y. Song, W. Wang, C. Zhang, D. W. Tam, T. Chen, D. Hu, Z. Xu, S. Chi, et al., Phys. Rev. X 8, 021056 (2018), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021056

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021056 2018

  49. [49]

    S. Wu, D. Ishikawa, A. Q. R. Baron, A. Alatas, A. H. Said, J. Guo, Y. He, X. Chen, Y. Song, J. G. Ana- lytis, et al., Phys. Rev. B 112, 174302 (2025), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/dpd1-mbhw

    work page doi:10.1103/dpd1-mbhw 2025

  50. [50]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.040501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.040501 2022

  51. [51]

    Cheong and F.-T

    S.-W. Cheong and F.-T. Huang, npj Quantum Materials 10, 38 (2025), ISSN 2397-4648, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41535-025-00756-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00756-5 2025

  52. [52]

    Q. Liu, X. Dai, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Nature Physics 21, 329–331 (2025), ISSN 1745-2481, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02750-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02750-3 2025

  53. [53]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Nature Reviews Materials 10, 473–485 (2025), ISSN 2058-8437, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41578-025-00779-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-025-00779-1 2025

  54. [54]

    G. Yang, R. Chen, C. Liu, J. Li, Z. Pan, L. Deng, N. Zheng, Y. Tang, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, et al., arXiv e- prints arXiv:2512.00972 (2025), 2512.00972

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    H. W. S. Arachchige, W. R. Meier, M. Mar- shall, T. Matsuoka, R. Xue, M. A. McGuire, R. P. Hermann, H. Cao, and D. Mandrus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 216402 (2022), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.216402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.216402 2022

  56. [56]

    B. R. Ortiz, W. R. Meier, G. Pokharel, J. Chamorro, F. Yang, S. Mozaffari, A. Thaler, S. J. Gomez Alvarado, H. Zhang, D. S. Parker, et al., Journal of the Ameri- can Chemical Society 147, 5279–5292 (2025), ISSN 1520- 5126, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c16347

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.4c16347 2025

  57. [57]

    H. Tan, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, and B. Yan, Physical Review Letters 127, 046401 (2021), ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114, URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.046401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.046401 2021

  58. [58]

    T. Park, M. Ye, and L. Balents, Physical Re- view B 104, 035142 (2021), ISSN 2469-9969, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.035142

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.035142 2021

  59. [59]

    Lin and R

    Y.-P. Lin and R. M. Nandkishore, Physical Re- view B 104, 045122 (2021), ISSN 2469-9969, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.045122

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.045122 2021

  60. [60]

    M. M. Denner, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Physical Re- 10 view Letters 127, 217601 (2021), ISSN 1079-7114, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.217601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.217601 2021

  61. [61]

    H. Luo, Q. Gao, H. Liu, Y. Gu, D. Wu, C. Yi, J. Jia, S. Wu, X. Luo, Y. Xu, et al., Nature Com- munications 13, 273 (2022), ISSN 2041-1723, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27946-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27946-6 2022

  62. [62]

    G. Liu, X. Ma, K. He, Q. Li, H. Tan, Y. Liu, J. Xu, W. Tang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Nature Communications 13, 3461 (2022), ISSN 2041-1723, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31162-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31162-1 2022

  63. [63]

    G. He, L. Peis, E. F. Cuddy, Z. Zhao, D. Li, Y. Zhang, R. Stumberger, B. Moritz, H. Yang, H. Gao, et al., Nature Communica- tions 15, 1895 (2024), ISSN 2041-1723, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45865-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45865-0 2024

  64. [64]

    You, C.-E

    J.-Y. You, C.-E. Hsu, M. Del Ben, and Z. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106401 (2025), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.106401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.106401 2025

  65. [65]

    S. Cao, C. Xu, H. Fukui, T. Manjo, Y. Dong, M. Shi, Y. Liu, C. Cao, and Y. Song, Nature Commu- nications 14, 7671 (2023), ISSN 2041-1723, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-43454-1

    2023

  66. [66]

    Korshunov, H

    A. Korshunov, H. Hu, D. Subires, Y. Jiang, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, X. Feng, A. Rajapitamahuni, C. Yi, S. Roychowd- hury, M. G. Vergniory, et al., Nature Communi- cations 14, 6646 (2023), ISSN 2041-1723, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-42186-6

    2023

  67. [67]

    Y. Hu, J. Ma, Y. Li, Y. Jiang, D. J. Gawryluk, T. Hu, J. Teyssier, V. Multian, Z. Yin, S. Xu, et al., Nature Communications 15, 1658 (2024), ISSN 2041-1723, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45859-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45859-y 2024

  68. [68]

    F. Z. Yang, X. Huang, H. Tan, A. Kundu, S. Kim, M. Thinel, J. Ingham, A. Rajapitamahuni, Y. Q. Cai, C. Nelson, et al., Phys. Rev. B 112, 245113 (2025), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/6yk1-19mn

    work page doi:10.1103/6yk1-19mn 2025

  69. [69]

    J. J. Yang, Y. J. Choi, Y. S. Oh, A. Hogan, Y. Horibe, K. Kim, B. I. Min, and S.-W. Cheong, Physical Re- view Letters 108, 116402 (2012), ISSN 1079-7114, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.116402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.116402 2012

  70. [70]

    S. Pyon, K. Kudo, and M. Nohara, Journal of the Physi- cal Society of Japan 81, 053701 (2012), ISSN 1347-4073, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.81.053701

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.81.053701 2012

  71. [71]

    Kitagawa, H

    S. Kitagawa, H. Kotegawa, H. Tou, H. Ishii, K. Kudo, M. Nohara, and H. Harima, Journal of the Physical So- ciety of Japan 82, 113704 (2013), ISSN 1347-4073, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.82.113704

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.82.113704 2013

  72. [72]

    K. Kudo, H. Ishii, M. Takasuga, K. Iba, S. Nakano, J. Kim, A. Fujiwara, and M. Nohara, Journal of the Phys- ical Society of Japan 82, 063704 (2013), ISSN 1347-4073, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.82.063704

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.82.063704 2013

  73. [73]

    B. Chen, Y. Gu, D. Wang, D. Shao, W. Deng, X. Han, M. Jin, J. Song, Y. Zeng, H. Ishii, et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2411.04407 (2024), 2411.04407

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Anderson, Materials Research Bulletin 8, 153–160 (1973), ISSN 0025-5408, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(73)90167-0

    P. Anderson, Materials Research Bulletin 8, 153–160 (1973), ISSN 0025-5408, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(73)90167-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0025-5408(73)90167-0 1973

  75. [75]

    P. W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196–1198 (1987), ISSN 1095-9203, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4793.1196

    work page doi:10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 1987

  76. [76]

    Shimizu, H

    Y. Shimizu, H. Akimoto, H. Tsujii, A. Tajima, and R. Kato, Physical Review Letters 99, 256403 (2007), ISSN 1079-7114, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.256403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.256403 2007

  77. [77]

    Baron, Y

    A. Baron, Y. Tanaka, S. Goto, K. Takeshita, T. Mat- sushita, and T. Ishikawa, Journal of Physics and Chem- istry of Solids 61, 461–465 (2000), ISSN 0022-3697, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(99)00337-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-3697(99)00337-6 2000

  78. [78]

    Physical Review B47, 558–561 (1993)

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.558 1993

  79. [79]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 1999

  80. [80]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.136406 2008