pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16026 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Mircomechanical insights into unconstrained grain boundary sliding

Divya Sri Bandla , Subin Lee , Christoph Kirchlechner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords grain boundary slidingmicropillar compressionstrain rate sensitivitybicrystalnickelactivation energyhigh temperature deformation
0
0 comments X

The pith

High strain-rate sensitivity of grain boundary sliding in polycrystals arises from accommodation processes, not the sliding mechanism itself.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests nickel bicrystal micropillars containing one high-angle grain boundary against single-crystal controls to separate the intrinsic sliding response from other effects. Compression experiments span room temperature to 600 °C and strain rates from 5×10^{-4} to 10^{-1} s^{-1}. The bicrystal data yield a low strain-rate sensitivity of roughly 0.034 and an activation energy of 234 kJ/mol that matches grain-boundary diffusion. These values remain close to room-temperature behavior, indicating that diffusion-controlled accommodation steps are absent during the isolated sliding. The distinction matters because most engineering models of high-temperature polycrystal flow assume the sliding step itself carries the high rate sensitivity observed in bulk tests.

Core claim

Dislocation-mediated unconstrained grain boundary sliding isolated by bicrystal-minus-single-crystal subtraction exhibits a strain-rate sensitivity of 0.034 ± 0.017 across the tested temperature and rate range, together with an activation energy of 234 kJ mol^{-1} that corresponds to grain-boundary diffusion-assisted glide of grain-boundary dislocations. The low sensitivity demonstrates that the high strain-rate sensitivity conventionally linked to grain boundary sliding in polycrystals is supplied by accommodation processes rather than by the sliding mechanism.

What carries the argument

Bicrystal micropillar minus single-crystal micropillar subtraction that isolates the intrinsic grain-boundary sliding contribution from total pillar strain.

Load-bearing premise

Subtracting the single-crystal micropillar response from the bicrystal response cleanly isolates the intrinsic grain-boundary sliding contribution without residual effects from pillar geometry, surface constraints, or other deformation modes.

What would settle it

An independent measurement of sliding displacement rate in the same bicrystals that yields strain-rate sensitivity above 0.1 at 600 °C would falsify the claim that intrinsic sliding is rate-insensitive.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16026 by Christoph Kirchlechner, Divya Sri Bandla, Subin Lee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Secondary electron images of (a) a fabricated bicrystal micropillar (d = 1 µm), highlighting the HAGB with yellow arrows and the micropillar compression loading direction with a black arrow, and (b) and (c) are pillars deformed to a strain of 0.1 at RT and 300 °C, with a strain rate of 10-2 s-1. The colored dashed lines in (b) indicate the slip traces, and the white dashed ellipse in (c) indicates the acti… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Representative stress-strain curves of 1 µm pillars deformed at (a) RT and (b) 300 °C with strain rates from 10-1 to 5 × 10-4 s-1. (c) is the determination of SRS at RT and 300 °C, where each data point is from an individual micropillar compression test. The activation energy, Q, of unconstrained GBS, was determined from bicrystal micropillar compression over a range of temperatures from RT to 600 °C at a … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Secondary electron images of 3 µm pillars deformed to 0.1 strain with 10-3 s-1 strain rate at (a) 350, (b) 400, (c) 500, and (d) 600 °C. The slip traces in (a) are highlighted with colored dashed lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Engineering stress-strain curves of 3 µm (a) bicrystal and (b) [344] pillars deformed at temperatures from RT to 600 °C with a strain rate of 10-3 s-1 . Fig. 4a shows the typical stress-strain curves for bicrystal micropillars (d = 3 µm) deformed from RT to 600 °C at a strain rate of 10-3 s-1. The yield stress decreases with increasing temperature despite minor fluctuations. For comparison, identical tests… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Activation energy determination of Ni [344] single-crystal and bicrystal micropillars of diameter 3 µm. Each data point is from an individual micropillar compression test. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: depicts the secondary electron images of 1 µm pillars deformed at 300 °C with strain rates 10-1, 10-3, and 5×10-4 s-1. Similar to 10-2 s-1 strain rate ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Yield strength of Ni [344] single crystal pillars measured at RT after (a) exposing 1 µm pillars to 300 °C for 1 h and (b) exposing 3 µm pillars to 500 and 600 °C for 1 h. For comparison, the yield strength measured at RT for as-fabricated pillars is also plotted. Each data point is from an individual micropillar compression test [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Grain boundary sliding (GBS) is a key deformation mechanism at high homologous temperatures in polycrystalline materials, however, its intrinsic behavior is often obscured by additional strain accommodation processes. In this study, dislocation-mediated unconstrained GBS was investigated using Ni bicrystal micropillars containing a single high-angle grain boundary. Micropillar compression tests were conducted over a temperature range from room temperature to $600\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and strain rates between $5\times10^{-4}$ and $10^{-1}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$. By comparing bicrystal and single-crystal responses, the intrinsic contribution of GBS was isolated. The strain-rate sensitivity remained low (SRS $\approx 0.034 \pm 0.017$), comparable to room temperature values, indicating the absence of diffusion-controlled accommodation mechanisms. The activation energy for GBS was determined to be $234\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}$, consistent with grain boundary diffusion-assisted glide of grain boundary dislocations. These results demonstrate that the high strain-rate sensitivity commonly associated with GBS in polycrystals originates primarily from accommodation processes rather than the intrinsic sliding mechanism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper investigates intrinsic grain boundary sliding (GBS) in Ni bicrystal micropillars with a single high-angle grain boundary by performing compression tests from room temperature to 600°C at strain rates 5×10^{-4} to 10^{-1} s^{-1}. Subtracting the single-crystal micropillar response from the bicrystal response is used to isolate the GBS contribution, yielding a low strain-rate sensitivity (SRS ≈ 0.034 ± 0.017) comparable to room-temperature values and an activation energy of 234 kJ mol^{-1} consistent with grain-boundary diffusion-assisted glide of GB dislocations. The authors conclude that the high SRS typically seen for GBS in polycrystals arises from accommodation processes rather than the intrinsic sliding mechanism.

Significance. If the subtraction cleanly isolates unconstrained GBS, the result would be significant for high-temperature deformation modeling by showing that intrinsic GBS has low rate sensitivity independent of diffusion-controlled accommodation. The micropillar geometry enables direct comparison at small scales over a useful temperature-rate window, and the reported activation energy aligns with expected GB diffusion values. The work is purely experimental with no ad-hoc parameters or circular derivations, which strengthens its potential impact once methodological details are supplied.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and implied Methods: The central claim that 'by comparing bicrystal and single-crystal responses, the intrinsic contribution of GBS was isolated' is load-bearing for the reported SRS and activation energy. However, the grain boundary can alter dislocation nucleation, transmission, or pile-up in the adjacent grains relative to an isolated single-crystal pillar, so the subtracted difference may retain accommodation or geometry-dependent terms rather than representing pure sliding. Post-deformation EBSD or TEM analysis of dislocation structures near the boundary, or finite-element validation of pillar geometry effects, is required to support the isolation.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract/Results: No information is given on data reduction, error propagation, number of replicates, curve alignment for subtraction, or how elastic versus plastic contributions were handled before extracting SRS ≈ 0.034 ± 0.017 and the activation energy. These details are essential because the low SRS value and the conclusion about accommodation processes depend directly on the reliability of the difference curves.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title] Title: 'Mircomechanical' is a typographical error and should read 'Micromechanical'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The strain-rate range is stated as 'between 5×10^{-4} and 10^{-1} s^{-1}' without specifying the exact discrete rates tested or whether logarithmic spacing was used; this affects reproducibility of the SRS calculation.
  3. [Results] General: Inclusion of representative raw stress-strain curves (bicrystal, single-crystal, and subtracted) as a main figure or supplementary material would greatly improve transparency of the subtraction procedure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental isolation of GBS contribution

full rationale

The manuscript reports micropillar compression experiments on Ni bicrystals and single crystals across temperature and strain-rate ranges. The intrinsic GBS response is obtained by direct subtraction of the single-crystal stress-strain curve from the bicrystal curve; the resulting strain-rate sensitivity (≈0.034) and activation energy (234 kJ mol⁻¹) are then read off from the experimental difference data via standard Arrhenius plotting. No equations, models, or fitted parameters are introduced that would make any reported quantity equivalent to its own inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear as load-bearing steps in the derivation chain. The work therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental study reporting measured quantities; no theoretical model, free parameters, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5500 in / 1167 out tokens · 29931 ms · 2026-05-10T08:36:54.978089+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Langdon, Grain boundary sliding revisited: Developments in sliding over four decades, J

    T.G. Langdon, Grain boundary sliding revisited: Developments in sliding over four decades, J. Mater. Sci. 41 (2006) 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-6476-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10853-006-6476-0 2006

  2. [2]

    J.-J. He, R. Sandström, S.-R. Lü, P. Korzhavyi, J. Zhang, H.-Y. Qin, J.-B. Liu, Predicting grain boundary sliding in metallic materials, Acta Mater. 286 (2025) 120718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2025.120718

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2025.120718 2025

  3. [3]

    Prasad, A.H

    M.J.N.V. Prasad, A.H. Chokshi, Superplasticity in electrodeposited nanocrystalline nickel, Acta Mater. 58 (2010) 5724–5736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.047

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.047 2010

  4. [4]

    Roodposhti, A

    P.S. Roodposhti, A. Sarkar, K.L. Murty, H. Brody, R. Scattergood, Grain boundary sliding mechanism during high temperature deformation of AZ31 Magnesium alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 669 (2016) 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.076

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.076 2016

  5. [5]

    Wilkinson, D.J

    T.G. Langdon, A unified approach to grain boundary sliding in creep and superplasticity, Acta Metall. Mater. 42 (1994) 2437–2443. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956- 7151(94)90322-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0956- 1994

  6. [6]

    Gong, A.J

    J. Gong, A.J. Wilkinson, Sample size effects on grain boundary sliding, Scr. Mater. 114 (2016) 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.11.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.11.029 2016

  7. [7]

    Aitken, D

    Z.H. Aitken, D. Jang, C.R. Weinberger, J.R. Greer, Grain Boundary Sliding in Aluminum Nano‐Bi‐Crystals Deformed at Room Temperature, Small 10 (2014) 100–

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201301060

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.201301060

  9. [9]

    Bandla, S

    D.S. Bandla, S. Lee, C. Kirchlechner, On the critical temperature required for grain boundary sliding in Nickel bicrystal: A micromechanical approach, Mater. Sci. Eng. A (2026) 150130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2026.150130

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2026.150130 2026

  10. [10]

    Q. Wei, S. Cheng, K.T. Ramesh, E. Ma, Effect of nanocrystalline and ultrafine grain sizes on the strain rate sensitivity and activation volume: fcc versus bcc metals, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 381 (2004) 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.03.064

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2004.03.064 2004

  11. [11]

    Wei, Strain rate effects in the ultrafine grain and nanocrystalline regimes— influence on some constitutive responses, J

    Q. Wei, Strain rate effects in the ultrafine grain and nanocrystalline regimes— influence on some constitutive responses, J. Mater. Sci. 42 (2007) 1709–1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0700-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0700-9 2007

  12. [12]

    Zhang, G

    J.Y. Zhang, G. Liu, J. Sun, Strain rate effects on the mechanical response in multi- and single-crystalline Cu micropillars: Grain boundary effects, Int. J. Plast. 50 (2013) 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.03.009. 13

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.03.009 2013

  13. [13]

    Malyar, G

    N.V. Malyar, G. Dehm, C. Kirchlechner, Strain rate dependence of the slip transfer through a penetrable high angle grain boundary in copper, Scr. Mater. 138 (2017) 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.05.042

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.05.042 2017

  14. [14]

    C. Peng, Y. Zhong, Y. Lu, S. Narayanan, T. Zhu, J. Lou, Strain rate dependent mechanical properties in single crystal nickel nanowires, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 (2013) 083102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4793481

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4793481 2013

  15. [15]

    Y. Xiao, B. Gan, A.S. Sologubenko, R. Spolenak, J.M. Wheeler, Size- and strain rate-dependence of nickel and Ni–Co micropillars with varying stacking fault energy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 800 (2021) 140266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.140266

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.140266 2021

  16. [16]

    Feldner, B

    P. Feldner, B. Merle, M. Göken, Breakdown of the superplastic deformation behavior of heterogeneous nanomaterials at small length scales, Mater. Res. Lett. 9 (2021) 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2020.1818323

    work page doi:10.1080/21663831.2020.1818323 2021

  17. [17]

    Zener, J.H

    C. Zener, J.H. Hollomon, Effect of Strain Rate Upon Plastic Flow of Steel, J. Appl. Phys. 15 (1944) 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1707363

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1707363 1944

  18. [18]

    Hull, D.J

    D. Hull, D.J. Bacon, Introduction to dislocations, 4th ed, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford [Oxfordshire] Boston, 2001

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    Divinski, G

    S.V. Divinski, G. Reglitz, G. Wilde, Grain boundary self-diffusion in polycrystalline nickel of different purity levels, Acta Mater. 58 (2010) 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.015 2010

  20. [20]

    Maier, H

    K. Maier, H. Mehrer, E. Lessmann, W. Schüle, Self‐diffusion in nickel at low temperatures, Phys. Status Solidi B 78 (1976) 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2220780230. 1 Mircomechanical insights into unconstrained grain boundary sliding Divya Sri Bandla1, Subin Lee1,*, Christoph Kirchlechner1 1 Institute for Applied Materials, Karlsruhe Institute of ...

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.2220780230 1976