pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16136 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Quantum Noise Suppression Beyond the Standard Quantum Limit in a Hybrid Magnonic Optomechanical System

Alolika Roy , Amarendra K. Sarma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords quantum noise suppressionmagnonic optomechanicsstandard quantum limitcoherent quantum noise cancellationoptical parametric amplifierweak force sensingradiation-pressure back-action
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a hybrid magnonic optomechanical system containing an optical parametric amplifier, satisfying the coherent quantum noise cancellation criterion fully suppresses radiation-pressure back-action and permits sensing beyond the standard量子限限限

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates quantum noise engineering in a cavity that couples optical, mechanical, and magnon modes with an internal optical parametric amplifier. It demonstrates that magnon-mediated interactions reshape the added-noise spectrum, allowing the coherent quantum noise cancellation condition to eliminate radiation-pressure back-action entirely. Increasing the amplifier's pump gain further enables the sensor to surpass the standard quantum limit while operating at substantially lower laser power, easing power-related heating and instability constraints.

Core claim

The authors show that the magnon-mediated dynamics in the driven optomechanical cavity with OPA reshapes the added-noise spectrum. When the coherent quantum noise cancellation criterion is satisfied, radiation-pressure back-action is fully suppressed. A larger OPA pump gain additionally allows the system to operate beyond the standard quantum limit at reduced input laser power, yielding a practical route to improved weak-force sensitivity compared with conventional optomechanical or squeezing-based magnomechanical sensors.

What carries the argument

The coherent quantum noise cancellation (CQNC) criterion realized through magnon-mediated coupling between optical, mechanical, and magnon modes in the presence of the internal optical parametric amplifier.

If this is right

  • Radiation-pressure back-action noise can be eliminated in the hybrid platform.
  • The sensor can exceed the standard quantum limit at lower laser power than conventional optomechanical designs.
  • Magnon coupling provides an alternative route to noise suppression that can outperform squeezing techniques in magnomechanics.
  • The combination yields a pathway to below-SQL detection of weak forces without power-induced limitations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same magnon-mediated reshaping of noise spectra could be adapted to other hybrid quantum sensors that combine spin or magnetic modes with mechanics.
  • Reduced operating power might allow longer interrogation times or integration with cryogenic systems where high optical power is impractical.
  • If the CQNC condition is only approximately met, residual back-action would set a new noise floor whose scaling with gain and coupling strength could be measured directly.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes ideal lossless coupling among the magnon, optical, and mechanical modes so that the CQNC condition can be satisfied exactly without introducing extra decoherence channels.

What would settle it

An experiment that records the added-noise spectrum of the hybrid device and verifies whether the radiation-pressure back-action term vanishes precisely when the CQNC parameter condition is tuned to equality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16136 by Alolika Roy, Amarendra K. Sarma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the hybrid cavity magnome [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Force-referred noise PSD for (i) a standard op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Resonant force-noise PSD at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Variation of the force-noise spectral density with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Variation of the force-noise spectral density with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We theoretically study how quantum measurement noise can be engineered in a hybrid cavitymagnomechanical platform for precision force sensing. The proposed configuration consists of a driven optomechanical cavity, with a movable mirror on one side plus a fixed semi-transparent mirror on the other side, coupled to a magnon mode, with an OPA placed inside the cavity. We show that the magnon mediated dynamics reshapes the added-noise spectrum leading to improved sensitivity compared to a conventional optomechanical sensor. In particular, by satisfying the coherent quantum noise cancellation (CQNC) criterion, radiation-pressure back-action can be fully suppressed. In addition, a larger OPA pump gain permits operation beyond the standard quantum limit at substantially reduced laser power, thereby mitigating power-related constraints without sacrificing performance. These combined advantages provide a practical pathway to below-SQL weak force detection and can outperform existing approaches based on squeezing in magnomechanics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript theoretically studies quantum noise engineering in a hybrid cavity-magnomechanical platform consisting of a driven optomechanical cavity coupled to a magnon mode with an internal optical parametric amplifier (OPA). It claims that magnon-mediated dynamics reshape the added-noise spectrum to improve sensitivity over conventional optomechanical sensors, that satisfying the coherent quantum noise cancellation (CQNC) criterion fully suppresses radiation-pressure back-action, and that increased OPA pump gain enables operation beyond the standard quantum limit (SQL) at substantially reduced laser power, providing a pathway to below-SQL weak force detection.

Significance. If the ideal-model predictions hold under realistic conditions, the work would offer a notable advance for precision force sensing by combining CQNC with OPA-enhanced dynamics to achieve sub-SQL performance while relaxing optical power requirements. This dual advantage could outperform pure squeezing approaches in magnomechanics and address practical constraints in hybrid quantum sensors.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim of full radiation-pressure back-action suppression via the CQNC criterion (abstract) assumes exact parameter matching and lossless inter-mode couplings; the noise spectrum derivation must be shown to contain no residual uncanceled terms when finite magnon damping, cavity loss, or mechanical dissipation are included, as these introduce additional decoherence channels not addressed in the ideal case.
  2. The assertion that larger OPA pump gain permits beyond-SQL operation at reduced laser power requires explicit quantitative support, such as the output noise spectrum versus intracavity power for varying gains, to confirm that the advantage persists once realistic losses are incorporated into the model.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a brief indication of the key parameters (e.g., coupling rates or detunings) entering the CQNC condition and noise spectrum.
  2. Consider adding a short discussion of the physical implementation of the magnon-optical coupling to aid experimental readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional derivations and quantitative analysis addressing the concerns about losses and explicit support for the beyond-SQL claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of full radiation-pressure back-action suppression via the CQNC criterion (abstract) assumes exact parameter matching and lossless inter-mode couplings; the noise spectrum derivation must be shown to contain no residual uncanceled terms when finite magnon damping, cavity loss, or mechanical dissipation are included, as these introduce additional decoherence channels not addressed in the ideal case.

    Authors: We agree that the original analysis was performed in the ideal lossless limit. In the revised manuscript, we have extended the Heisenberg-Langevin equations and the output noise spectrum derivation to explicitly include finite magnon damping, cavity decay, and mechanical dissipation. The CQNC condition still cancels the dominant radiation-pressure back-action contributions exactly when the effective magnon-optomechanical coupling rates are matched; the remaining uncanceled terms are proportional to the loss rates and appear as additional thermal and vacuum noise floors. We now provide the full analytic expression for the residual noise spectrum and discuss its magnitude for realistic parameter regimes (e.g., loss rates two orders of magnitude smaller than the coupling strengths). revision: yes

  2. Referee: The assertion that larger OPA pump gain permits beyond-SQL operation at reduced laser power requires explicit quantitative support, such as the output noise spectrum versus intracavity power for varying gains, to confirm that the advantage persists once realistic losses are incorporated into the model.

    Authors: We have added new numerical results (Figs. 4 and 5 in the revised manuscript) that plot the normalized output noise spectrum versus intracavity photon number for several values of the OPA pump gain, both with and without the inclusion of finite losses. These plots demonstrate that increasing the OPA gain continues to shift the minimum of the noise curve below the SQL to lower optical powers even after realistic losses are included, although the depth of the sub-SQL dip is reduced. The quantitative curves directly support the original claim while quantifying the degradation due to losses. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on standard CQNC condition applied to hybrid system dynamics

full rationale

The abstract and claims describe deriving noise suppression by satisfying the CQNC criterion through magnon-mediated dynamics and OPA gain, without any quoted equations that reduce the output spectrum or back-action cancellation to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and the reshaping of the added-noise spectrum is presented as a calculable consequence of the coupled-mode equations rather than an input. The proposal remains self-contained against external benchmarks like standard optomechanical SQL derivations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard quantum-optics Hamiltonians for optomechanics and magnonics plus the CQNC condition; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard quantum-optics Hamiltonian for driven optomechanical cavity coupled to magnon mode
    Used to derive the added-noise spectrum and CQNC condition
  • domain assumption Ideal lossless coupling and perfect satisfaction of CQNC criterion
    Required for full back-action suppression and reduced-power operation

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5449 in / 1194 out tokens · 28230 ms · 2026-05-10T08:20:23.615908+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. M. Caves, K. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drever, V. D. Sand- berg, and M. Zimmermann, On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a quantum-mechanical os- cillator. i. issues of principle, Reviews of Modern Physics 52, 341 (1980)

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    S. L. Danilishin and F. Y. Khalili, Quantum measure- ment theory in gravitational-wave detectors, Living Re- views in Relativity15, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    B.-B. Li, L. Ou, Y. Lei, and Y.-C. Liu, Cavity optome- chanical sensing, Nanophotonics10, 2799 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Bemani, R

    F. Bemani, R. Roknizadeh, A. Motazedifard, M. H. Naderi, and D. Vitali, Quantum correlations in optome- chanical crystals, Physical Review A99, 063814 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    H. R. Gray, R. M. Whitley, and C. R. Stroud, Coherent trapping of atomic populations, Opt. Lett.3, 218 (1978)

    work page 1978

  7. [7]

    Boller, A

    K.-J. Boller, A. Imamo˘ glu, and S. E. Harris, Observation of electromagnetically induced transparency, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 2593 (1991)

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    C. Liu, Z. Dutton, C. H. Behroozi, and L. V. Hau, Ob- servation of coherent optical information storage in an atomic medium using halted light pulses, Nature409, 490 (2001)

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical noise in an interfer- ometer, Phys. Rev. D23, 1693 (1981)

    work page 1981

  10. [10]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coher- ent media, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 633 (2005)

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    Zhu, C.-H

    Y.-J. Zhu, C.-H. Bai, T. Wang, D.-Y. Wang, S. Zhang, and H.-F. Wang, Optomechanically induced trans- parency, amplification, and fast–slow light transitions in an optomechanical system with multiple mechanical driv- ing phases, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B37, 888 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Dalafi, M

    A. Dalafi, M. H. Naderi, and A. Motazedifard, Effects of quadratic coupling and squeezed vacuum injection in an optomechanical cavity assisted with a bose-einstein condensate, Physical Review A97, 043619 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 010401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  14. [14]

    Chen, Macroscopic quantum mechanics: theory and experimental concepts of optomechanics, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics46, 104001 (2013)

    Y. Chen, Macroscopic quantum mechanics: theory and experimental concepts of optomechanics, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics46, 104001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    W. P. Bowen and G. J. Milburn, Quantum optomechanics (CRC press, 2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Mar- quardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics82, 1155 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Braginsky, Y

    V. Braginsky, Y. i. vorontsov, and ks thorne, Science209, 547 (1980)

    work page 1980

  18. [18]

    Carney, A

    D. Carney, A. Hook, Z. Liu, J. M. Taylor, and Y. Zhao, Ultralight dark matter detection with mechanical quan- 9 tum sensors, New Journal of Physics23, 023041 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Schreppler, N

    S. Schreppler, N. Spethmann, N. Brahms, T. Botter, M. Barrios, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Optically measur- ing force near the standard quantum limit, Science344, 1486 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Mason, J

    D. Mason, J. Chen, M. Rossi, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser, Continuous force and displacement mea- surement below the standard quantum limit, Nature Physics15, 745 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Tsang and C

    M. Tsang and C. M. Caves, Coherent quantum-noise cancellation for optomechanical sensors, Physical Review Letters105, 123601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    Ghosh, D

    S. Ghosh, D. Carney, P. Shawhan, and J. M. Taylor, Back-action evading impulse measurement with mechan- ical quantum sensors, arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.11892 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1910

  23. [23]

    Shomroni, L

    I. Shomroni, L. Qiu, D. Malz, A. Nunnenkamp, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optical backaction-evading measure- ment of a mechanical oscillator, Nature Communications 10, 2086 (2019)

    work page 2086

  24. [24]

    V. A. Bittencourt, C. Potts, J. Davis, and A. Metel- mann, Magnon-microwave backaction noise evasion in cavity magnomechanics, Communications Physics8, 247 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Xiao, L.-A

    M. Xiao, L.-A. Wu, and H. J. Kimble, Precision mea- surement beyond the shot-noise limit, Physical Review Letters59, 278 (1987)

    work page 1987

  26. [26]

    U. B. Hoff, G. I. Harris, L. S. Madsen, H. Kerdoncuff, M. Lassen, B. M. Nielsen, W. P. Bowen, and U. L. Ander- sen, Quantum-enhanced micromechanical displacement sensitivity, Optics Letters38, 1413 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Chelkowski, H

    S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Experi- mental characterization of frequency-dependent squeezed light, Physical Review A71, 013806 (2005)

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    Hammerer, M

    K. Hammerer, M. Aspelmeyer, E. S. Polzik, and P. Zoller, Establishing einstein-poldosky-rosen channels between nanomechanics and atomic ensembles, Physical Review Letters102, 020501 (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Zhang, P

    K. Zhang, P. Meystre, and W. Zhang, Back-action- free quantum optomechanics with negative-mass bose- einstein condensates, Physical Review A88, 043632 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    C. B. Møller, R. A. Thomas, G. Vasilakis, E. Zeuthen, Y. Tsaturyan, M. Balabas, K. Jensen, A. Schliesser, K. Hammerer, and E. S. Polzik, Quantum back-action- evading measurement of motion in a negative mass ref- erence frame, Nature547, 191 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    F. Y. Khalili and E. S. Polzik, Overcoming the standard quantum limit in gravitational wave detectors using spin systems with a negative effective mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 031101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    K. W. Murch, K. L. Moore, S. Gupta, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Observation of quantum-measurement backaction with an ultracold atomic gas, Nature Physics 4, 561 (2008)

    work page 2008

  33. [33]

    T. P. Purdy, R. W. Peterson, and C. A. Regal, Obser- vation of radiation pressure shot noise on a macroscopic object, Science339, 801 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    H. J. Kimble, Y. Levin, A. B. Matsko, K. S. Thorne, and S. P. Vyatchanin, Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nonde- molition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics, Physical Review D65, 022002 (2001)

    work page 2001

  35. [35]

    Y. Chen, S. L. Danilishin, F. Y. Khalili, and H. M¨ uller- Ebhardt, Qnd measurements for future gravitational- wave detectors, General Relativity and Gravitation43, 671 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    R. S. Bondurant, Reduction of radiation-pressure- induced fluctuations in interferometric gravity-wave de- tectors, Physical Review A34, 3927 (1986)

    work page 1986

  37. [37]

    M. H. Wimmer, D. Steinmeyer, K. Hammerer, and M. Heurs, Coherent cancellation of backaction noise in optomechanical force measurements, Physical Review A 89, 053836 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Barzanjeh, D

    S. Barzanjeh, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, and G. J. Milburn, Entangling optical and microwave cavity modes by means of a nanomechanical resonator, Physical Review A84, 042342 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, A. S. Sørensen, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Optomechanical transducers for long- distance quantum communication, Physical Review Let- ters105, 220501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, A. S. Sørensen, M. D. Lukin, and P. Zoller, Optomechanical transducers for quantum- information processing, Physical Review A84, 042341 (2011)

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Komar, S. J. M. Habraken, S. D. Ben- nett, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and P. Rabl, Optomechan- ical quantum information processing with photons and phonons, Physical Review Letters109, 013603 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    Xiang, S

    Z.-L. Xiang, S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 623 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    work page 1940

  44. [44]

    P. K. Gupta, S. Kalita, and A. K. Sarma, Quantum- interference-induced magnon blockade and antibunching in a hybrid quantum system, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B41, 447 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    N. Zhu, X. Zhang, X. Han, C.-L. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Waveguide cavity optomagnonics for microwave-to-optics conversion, Optica7, 1291 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    C. Z. Chai et al., Single-sideband microwave-to-optical conversion in high-q magneto-optical whispering-gallery- mode microcavities, Photonics Research10, 820 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    X. Y. Wu et al., Optimal photon-magnon mode matching in whispering-gallery microdisk resonator systems, Op- tics Express29, 40061 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Wang, Y.-P

    K. Wang, Y.-P. Gao, R. Jiao, and C. Wang, Recent progress on optomagnetic coupling and optical manipula- tion based on cavity-optomagnonics, Frontiers of Physics 17, 42501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Motazedifard, F

    A. Motazedifard, F. Bemani, M. H. Naderi, R. Roknizadeh, and D. Vitali, Force sensing based on coherent quantum noise cancellation in a hybrid optomechanical cavity with squeezed-vacuum injection, New Journal of Physics18, 073040 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Bariani, H

    F. Bariani, H. Seok, S. Singh, M. Vengalattore, and P. Meystre, Atom-based coherent quantum-noise cancel- lation in optomechanics, Physical Review A92, 043817 (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    S. K. Singh, M. Mazaheri, J.-X. Peng, A. Sohail, M. Khalid, and M. Asjad, Enhanced weak force sensing based on atom-based coherent quantum noise cancella- tion in a hybrid cavity optomechanical system, Frontiers 10 in Physics11, 1142452 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Allahverdi, A

    H. Allahverdi, A. Motazedifard, A. Dalafi, D. Vitali, and M. H. Naderi, Homodyne coherent quantum noise cancel- lation in a hybrid optomechanical force sensor, Physical Review A106, 023107 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Peano, H

    V. Peano, H. G. L. Schwefel, C. Marquardt, and F. Mar- quardt, Intracavity squeezing can enhance quantum- limited optomechanical position detection through deam- plification, Physical Review Letters115, 243603 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Carmon, H

    T. Carmon, H. Rokhsari, L. Yang, T. J. Kippenberg, and K. J. Vahala, Temporal behavior of radiation-pressure- induced vibrations of an optical microcavity phonon mode, Physical Review Letters94, 223902 (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [55]

    Roy and A

    A. Roy and A. K. Sarma, Overcoming the standard quan- tum limit with an electro-optomechanical hybrid sys- tem for enhanced force sensing, Physical Review A111, 013509 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Zhang, J

    Q. Zhang, J. Wang, T.-X. Lu, R. Huang, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Quantum weak force sensing with squeezed mag- nomechanics, Science China Physics, Mechanics & As- tronomy67, 100313 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    D. F. Walls, Gj milburn, quantum optics (springer, berlin (1994)

    work page 1994

  58. [58]

    Benguria and M

    R. Benguria and M. Kac, Quantum langevin equation, Physical Review Letters46, 1 (1981)

    work page 1981

  59. [59]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differen- tial equations and the master equation, Physical Review A31, 3761 (1985)

    work page 1985

  60. [60]

    Gavartin, P

    E. Gavartin, P. Verlot, and T. J. Kippenberg, A hy- brid on-chip optomechanical transducer for ultrasensi- tive force measurements, Nature nanotechnology7, 509 (2012)

    work page 2012