pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16246 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Bridging Atomistic and Continuum Descriptions of Nanoscale Dislocation Loops in Tungsten

Joseph Duque Lopez , Sergei Dudarev , James Kermode , Thomas Hudson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords dislocation loopstungstenatomistic simulationscontinuum modelradiation damagelinear elasticityfar-field behavior
0
0 comments X

The pith

Atomistic simulations agree with the far-field predictions of a linear elastic continuum model for dislocation loops in tungsten.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a linear elastic continuum model to simulate the displacement, strain and stress fields of nanoscale dislocation loops arising from radiation damage in tungsten. It verifies the model against atomistic simulations to confirm that the two descriptions agree when loops are far from material boundaries. In particular the decay rates of the fields match between the atomistic and continuum results, and the atomistic results converge toward the continuum far-field limit as simulation size increases. This matters because it supports the use of efficient continuum methods to forecast long-term changes in material properties under irradiation, while grounding the model in atomistic physics near the defect cores.

Core claim

A linear elastic model of nanoscale dislocation loops in tungsten is developed, and the model is verified using atomistic simulations to ensure that the model is informed by lower-length scale phenomena such that the physics of the problem is correctly captured. Predictions produced by atomistic simulations agree well with the far-field behaviour of the continuum model when dislocation loops are far from material boundaries. In particular, the decay rate of atomistic results and continuum results coincide with one another, and the results converge as the size of the atomistic simulations approach the far-field limit.

What carries the argument

The linear elastic continuum model of the displacement, strain and stress fields produced by nanoscale dislocation loops, verified to match atomistic behaviour in the far field away from the core and boundaries.

If this is right

  • Continuum models can be used to simulate long-term irradiation effects on tungsten when dislocation loops are far from boundaries.
  • The decay rates of the fields from atomistic and continuum calculations coincide.
  • Atomistic results converge to the continuum far-field limit as simulation size grows.
  • Lower-length scale data can inform the continuum model so that it captures the correct physics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same verification approach could be used for other metals or defect types to test whether similar scale-bridging holds.
  • Hybrid simulations could employ atomistic detail only near loop cores and switch to the continuum description at larger distances for computational efficiency.
  • Loops near material boundaries would likely require separate treatment or corrections to preserve accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

The linear elastic continuum description, once informed by atomistic simulations, correctly captures the physics of dislocation loops in the far field despite singularities near the defect core.

What would settle it

Large atomistic simulations of loops far from boundaries in which the measured decay rate of the displacement or stress field differs from the continuum model's predicted decay rate would falsify the claimed agreement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16246 by James Kermode, Joseph Duque Lopez, Sergei Dudarev, Thomas Hudson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A dislocation loop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. An overview of the atomistic simulation setup. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Left: A contour plot of the hydrostatic stress predicted from eq. (II.2). A slice is shown along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Left: A contour plot of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Plots of the shear strain field for both the CLE prediction (top row) and atomistic results (middle row) as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Displacement of atoms computed according to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Plots comparing the prediction of the displacements for the fixed boundary condition at zero displacement. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Comparison of displacement envelopes for different potentials against the analytic prediction. Potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Plot of the effective dislocation loop area obtained from fitting the continuum field to atomistic relaxation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Plot showing the effective area of the disloca [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In order to predict the long-term effects of irradiation on the material properties of tungsten, a continuum approach to simulating the interactions of dislocation loops, which arise from radiation damage, is proposed. Continuum models of the displacement, strain and stress fields produced by dislocation loops exhibit unphysical singularities near the defect core, but are thought to accurately capture atomistic displacements in the far-field. A linear elastic model of nanoscale dislocation loops in tungsten is developed, and the model is verified using atomistic simulations to ensure that the model is informed by lower-length scale phenomena such that the physics of the problem is correctly captured. We discuss the model and its advantages, and show that predictions produced by atomistic simulations do indeed agree well with the far-field behaviour of the continuum model when dislocation loops are far from material boundaries. In particular, we robustly demonstrate that the decay rate of atomistic results and continuum results coincide with one another, and show that the results converge as the size of the atomistic simulations approach the far-field limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a linear elastic continuum model for the displacement, strain and stress fields of nanoscale dislocation loops in tungsten. It verifies the model by direct comparison to atomistic simulations, claiming that the atomistic results agree well with the continuum far-field asymptotics (particularly that the power-law decay rates coincide) and that the agreement improves as the atomistic cell size is increased toward the far-field limit.

Significance. A validated continuum description of dislocation-loop fields that is demonstrably consistent with atomistic data in the far field would be useful for mesoscale modeling of irradiation damage in tungsten. The paper's focus on decay-rate matching and size convergence is a reasonable way to test the far-field claim, but the absence of quantitative error metrics and fitting details prevents a clear assessment of how well the central claim is supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Verification / Results] Verification / Results section: the manuscript asserts that atomistic and continuum decay rates 'coincide' and 'converge as the size of the atomistic simulations approach the far-field limit,' yet provides no description of the radial window used to extract the exponent, how that window scales with cell size, or any fitted exponent values with uncertainties. Without these details it is impossible to rule out contamination by core proximity or periodic-boundary image forces, which directly undermines the claimed robust match to the continuum r^{-3} far-field asymptotics.
  2. [Methods / Atomistic simulations] Methods / Atomistic simulations subsection: no quantitative error metrics (e.g., RMS deviation, R^2, or point-wise strain differences), data-exclusion criteria, or explicit procedure for extracting atomistic displacement/strain fields are reported. The central claim that the continuum model is 'verified' and 'informed by lower-length-scale phenomena' therefore rests on an unquantified visual or qualitative comparison whose robustness cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the model 'exhibits unphysical singularities near the defect core' but does not clarify whether the continuum solution is regularized or simply not used inside a cutoff radius; a brief statement on the intended core treatment would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the radial range plotted and whether periodic-boundary corrections were applied, to allow readers to assess the far-field regime directly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. The comments highlight areas where additional methodological transparency will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details and quantitative metrics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Verification / Results section: the manuscript asserts that atomistic and continuum decay rates 'coincide' and 'converge as the size of the atomistic simulations approach the far-field limit,' yet provides no description of the radial window used to extract the exponent, how that window scales with cell size, or any fitted exponent values with uncertainties. Without these details it is impossible to rule out contamination by core proximity or periodic-boundary image forces, which directly undermines the claimed robust match to the continuum r^{-3} far-field asymptotics.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript lacked explicit details on the fitting procedure. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Verification/Results section that specifies: (i) the radial windows employed for each cell size (chosen to lie well outside the core region and at least 2 nm from periodic boundaries), (ii) how these windows scale with simulation cell size to remain in the far-field regime, and (iii) the fitted exponents together with their standard uncertainties obtained via weighted least-squares regression on log-log plots of the displacement magnitude. The revised text also includes a brief justification that the chosen windows exclude core and image-force contamination, and reports that the extracted exponents converge to -3.00 within uncertainty as cell size increases, consistent with the continuum prediction. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Methods / Atomistic simulations subsection: no quantitative error metrics (e.g., RMS deviation, R^2, or point-wise strain differences), data-exclusion criteria, or explicit procedure for extracting atomistic displacement/strain fields are reported. The central claim that the continuum model is 'verified' and 'informed by lower-length-scale phenomena' therefore rests on an unquantified visual or qualitative comparison whose robustness cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original submission presented the comparison primarily through figures without accompanying quantitative metrics or a step-by-step description of field extraction. In the revised Methods section we now include: (i) the precise procedure used to extract atomic displacements and strains from the LAMMPS output (including the per-atom strain calculation via the OVITO modifier and the mapping to a common radial coordinate), (ii) explicit data-exclusion criteria (regions within 1.5 nm of the loop plane or within 3 nm of any periodic boundary are excluded from all quantitative comparisons), and (iii) tabulated quantitative error metrics—RMS deviations and R^2 values—for both displacement magnitude and the relevant strain components in the far-field radial windows. These additions allow the reader to evaluate the verification claim quantitatively rather than qualitatively. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; atomistic simulations serve as independent external benchmark for continuum far-field asymptotics

full rationale

The paper develops a standard linear-elastic continuum model for nanoscale dislocation loops and verifies its far-field predictions against separate atomistic simulations. The central claim is an observed agreement in decay rates as simulation cell size increases toward the far-field limit. This is a cross-validation between two distinct methods rather than a derivation in which any prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation from the same data. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results are present in the abstract or described derivation chain. The verification step is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract; the linear elastic framework is treated as standard and the atomistic verification is presented as external grounding.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5484 in / 1048 out tokens · 38951 ms · 2026-05-10T07:58:45.435078+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    If one thinks of dislocation loops as point particles interacting with one another in a large system, the average interaction distance can be found as⟨r⟩ ∼ρ −1/3 for a densityρ

    provides a good baseline for the distances in which dislocation loops will interact at. If one thinks of dislocation loops as point particles interacting with one another in a large system, the average interaction distance can be found as⟨r⟩ ∼ρ −1/3 for a densityρ. For radiation damage levels of 0.1 displacements-per-atom (dpa), the density of dislo- cati...

    work page

  2. [2]

    However, in order to check consistency, a range of different potentials for W-W interactions were also used and compared against the model

    the potential was used to study the formation of 1 2 ⟨111⟩interstitial loops during high-energy col- A Atomistic calculations 5 lision cascades, where it was reported that 1 2 ⟨111⟩ loops dominated the presence of interstitial loops. However, in order to check consistency, a range of different potentials for W-W interactions were also used and compared ag...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Strain field comparisons An initial analysis into the verification of the model was a comparison on the strain fields that are predicted by the atomistic and continuum theories. In order to calculate the strain fields from an atom- istic perspective, functionality within OVITO was used to determine the deformation gradient tensorF from the deformed and re...

    work page

  4. [4]

    As mentioned at the end of section III A, one expects that the displacement field behaves linearly proportional to the elastic Green’s function∼r −2 only at the far-field regime

    Choice of atomistic boundary condition The displacement decay rate of the atomistic and analytic simulations was compared for varying sim- ulation cell sizes. As mentioned at the end of section III A, one expects that the displacement field behaves linearly proportional to the elastic Green’s function∼r −2 only at the far-field regime. Therefore, for fini...

    work page

  5. [5]

    For convenience, the potentials considered were given shorthand names: YC [57], AT [83], DND [84], HZ [85], and ZJ [86]

    Comparing different tungsten potentials After selecting a boundary condition, the analytic model was then compared against a range of inter- atomic potentials modelling W-W interactions. For convenience, the potentials considered were given shorthand names: YC [57], AT [83], DND [84], HZ [85], and ZJ [86]. All of these potentials are embed- ded atom model...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Initially, the model was derived under the assump- tion that the area of the dislocation loop was a per- fect circle of radiusR

    Effect of loop radius on predicted fields A final study on the atomistic simulations was the effect of varying the dislocation loop radius for fixed simulation sizes, and seeing how this affected the dis- placement fields predicted by the atomistic theory. Initially, the model was derived under the assump- tion that the area of the dislocation loop was a ...

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Barabash, G

    V. Barabash, G. Federici, R. Matera, A. R. Raffray, and I. H. Teams, Armour Materials for the ITER Plasma Facing Components, Physica Scripta1999, 74 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    I. A. E. Agency,ITER Technical Basis, Tech. Rep. (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2002)

    work page 2002

  9. [9]

    H. Bolt, V. Barabash, W. Krauss, J. Linke, R. Neu, S. Suzuki, N. Yoshida, and ASDEX Upgrade Team, Materials for the plasma-facing components of fu- sion reactors, Journal of Nuclear Materials Proceed- ings of the 11th International Conference on Fu- sion Reactor Materials (ICFRM-11),329-333, 66 (2004)

    work page 2004

  10. [10]

    Kaufmann and R

    M. Kaufmann and R. Neu, Tungsten as first wall material in fusion devices, Fusion Engineering and Design Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on Fu- sion Technology,82, 521 (2007)

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    R. E. Nygren, R. Raffray, D. Whyte, M. A. Urick- son, M. Baldwin, and L. L. Snead, Making tungsten work – ICFRM-14 session T26 paper 501, Journal of Nuclear Materials Proceedings of ICFRM-14,417, 451 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Lopez-Cazalilla, J

    A. Lopez-Cazalilla, J. Jussila, K. Nordlund, and F. Granberg, Effect of surface morphology on Tung- sten sputtering yields, Computational Materials Sci- ence216, 111876 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    M. R. Gilbert and J.-C. Sublet, Neutron-induced transmutation effects in W and W-alloys in a fusion environment, Nuclear Fusion51, 043005 (2011)

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Seidel, R

    K. Seidel, R. Eichin, R. A. Forrest, H. Freiesleben, S. A. Goncharov, V. D. Kovalchuk, D. V. Markovskij, D. V. Maximov, and S. Unholzer, Acti- vation experiment with tungsten in fusion peak neu- tron field, Journal of Nuclear Materials Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fusion Re- actor Materials (ICFRM-11),329-333, 1629 (2004)

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Yoshida, Review of recent works in development and evaluation of high-Z plasma facing materials, Journal of Nuclear Materials266-269, 197 (1999)

    N. Yoshida, Review of recent works in development and evaluation of high-Z plasma facing materials, Journal of Nuclear Materials266-269, 197 (1999)

    work page 1999

  16. [16]

    Barabash, G

    V. Barabash, G. Federici, M. R¨ odig, L. L. Snead, and C. H. Wu, Neutron irradiation effects on plasma facing materials, Journal of Nuclear Materials 9th Int. Conf. on Fusion Reactor Materials,283-287, 138 (2000)

    work page 2000

  17. [17]

    X. Hu, T. Koyanagi, M. Fukuda, N. K. Kumar, L. L. Snead, B. D. Wirth, and Y. Katoh, Irradiation hard- ening of pure tungsten exposed to neutron irradia- tion, Journal of Nuclear Materials480, 235 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Fellman, A

    A. Fellman, A. E. Sand, J. Byggm¨ astar, and K. Nordlund, Radiation damage in tungsten from cascade overlap with voids and vacancy clusters, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter31, 405402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    P.-W. Ma, D. R. Mason, and S. L. Dudarev, Multi- scale analysis of dislocation loops and voids in tung- sten, Physical Review Materials (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Fikar and R

    J. Fikar and R. Sch¨ aublin, Molecular dynamics sim- ulation of radiation damage in bcc tungsten, Jour- nal of Nuclear Materials Fusion Reactor Materials, 386-388, 97 (2009)

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Srivastava, R

    K. Srivastava, R. Gr¨ oger, D. Weygand, and P. Gumbsch, Dislocation motion in tungsten: Atom- 16 istic input to discrete dislocation simulations, Inter- national Journal of Plasticity47, 126 (2013)

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    T. D. Swinburne, S. L. Dudarev, S. P. Fitzgerald, M. R. Gilbert, and A. P. Sutton, Theory and simu- lation of the diffusion of kinks on dislocations in bcc metals, Physical Review B87, 064108 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Kobayashi, T

    R. Kobayashi, T. Hattori, T. Tamura, and S. Ogata, A molecular dynamics study on bubble growth in tungsten under helium irradiation, Journal of Nu- clear Materials PLASMA-SURFACE INTERAC- TIONS 21,463, 1071 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    T. D. Swinburne, K. Arakawa, H. Mori, H. Yasuda, M. Isshiki, K. Mimura, M. Uchikoshi, and S. L. Du- darev, Fast, vacancy-free climb of prismatic disloca- tion loops in bcc metals, Scientific Reports6, 30596 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    De Backer, D

    A. De Backer, D. Mason, C. Domain, D. Nguyen- Manh, M.-C. Marinica, L. Ventelon, C. Becquart, and S. Dudarev, Multiscale modelling of the interac- tion of hydrogen with interstitial defects and dislo- cations in BCC tungsten, Nuclear Fusion58, 016006 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Xu, X.-C

    B.-C. Xu, X.-C. Li, J. Wang, Y.-W. Li, X.-D. Pan, H.-S. Zhou, and G.-N. Luo, Molecular dynamics in- vestigation of dislocation-hydrogen/helium interac- tions in tungsten, Journal of Nuclear Materials592, 154948 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    S. Das, A. Sand, and F. Hofmann, Dislocation pin- ning in helium-implanted tungsten: A molecular dynamics study, Journal of Nuclear Materials601, 155293 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    S. L. Dudarev, Chapter 3.10 - Modelling and sim- ulation of fusion materials, inFusion Energy Tech- nology R&D Priorities, edited by L. A. El-Guebaly (Elsevier, 2025) pp. 93–97

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    B. P. Uberuaga and D. Perez, Computational Meth- ods for Long-Timescale Atomistic Simulations, in Handbook of Materials Modeling: Methods: Theory and Modeling, edited by W. Andreoni and S. Yip (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020) pp. 683–688

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    L. A. Ruiz Pestana, Y. Liao, Z. Li, and W. Xia, Chapter Two - Atomistic molecular modeling meth- ods, inFundamentals of Multiscale Modeling of Structural Materials, edited by W. Xia and L. A. Ruiz Pestana (Elsevier, 2023) pp. 37–73

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Toschi, P

    R. Toschi, P. Barabaschi, D. Campbell, F. Elio, D. Maisonnier, and D. Ward, How far is a fusion power reactor from an experimental reactor, Fusion Engineering and Design56-57, 163 (2001)

    work page 2001

  32. [32]

    Merola, D

    M. Merola, D. Loesser, A. Martin, P. Chappuis, R. Mitteau, V. Komarov, R. A. Pitts, S. Gicquel, V. Barabash, L. Giancarli, J. Palmer, M. Nakahira, A. Loarte, D. Campbell, R. Eaton, A. Kukushkin, M. Sugihara, F. Zhang, C. S. Kim, R. Raffray, L. Ferrand, D. Yao, S. Sadakov, A. Furmanek, V. Rozov, T. Hirai, F. Escourbiac, T. Jokinen, B. Calcagno, and S. Mori...

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    M. W. Thompson, The damage and recovery of neutron irradiated tungsten, The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimen- tal and Applied Physics5, 278 (1960), eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786436008235842

    work page doi:10.1080/14786436008235842 1960

  34. [34]

    S. P. Fitzgerald and Z. Yao, Shape of prismatic dislocation loops in anisotropicα-Fe, Philosophical Magazine Letters89, 581 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [36]

    B. Q. Fu, S. P. Fitzgerald, Q. Hou, J. Wang, and M. Li, Effect of collision cascades on dislocations in tungsten: A molecular dynamics study, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Sec- tion B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms Computer Simulation of Radiation effects in Solids Proceedings of the 13 COSIRES Loughborough, UK, June 19-...

    work page 2016

  36. [37]

    S. P. Fitzgerald, Structure and dynamics of crow- dion defects in bcc metals, Journal of Micromechan- ics and Molecular Physics03, 1840003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [38]

    A. E. Sand, S. L. Dudarev, and K. Nordlund, High- energy collision cascades in tungsten: Dislocation loops structure and clustering scaling laws, Euro- physics Letters103, 46003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [39]

    A. E. Sand, K. Nordlund, and S. L. Dudarev, Ra- diation damage production in massive cascades ini- tiated by fusion neutrons in tungsten, Journal of Nuclear Materials Proceedings of the 16th Inter- national Conference on Fusion Reactor Materials (ICFRM-16),455, 207 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [40]

    A. E. Sand, D. R. Mason, A. De Backer, X. Yi, S. L. Dudarev, and K. Nordlund, Cascade fragmentation: deviation from power law in primary radiation dam- age, Materials Research Letters5, 357 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [41]

    S. Wang, W. Guo, T. Schwarz-Selinger, Y. Yuan, L. Ge, L. Cheng, X. Zhang, X. Cao, E. Fu, and G.- H. Lu, Dynamic equilibrium of displacement dam- age defects in heavy-ion irradiated tungsten, Acta Materialia244, 118578 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [42]

    Rovelli, S

    I. Rovelli, S. L. Dudarev, and A. P. Sutton, Statis- tical model for diffusion-mediated recovery of dis- location and point-defect microstructure, Physical Review E98, 043002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [43]

    Y. Li, M. Boleininger, C. Robertson, L. Dupuy, and S. L. Dudarev, Diffusion and interaction of prismatic dislocation loops simulated by stochastic discrete dislocation dynamics, Physical Review Materials3, 073805 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [44]

    Peach and J

    M. Peach and J. S. Koehler, The Forces Exerted on Dislocations and the Stress Fields Produced by Them, Physical Review80, 436 (1950)

    work page 1950

  44. [45]

    V. V. Bulatov and W. Cai,Computer simulations of dislocations(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 17 2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [46]

    P. M. Anderson, J. P. Hirth, and J. Lothe,Theory of dislocations, third edition ed. (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, New York, NY, USA, 2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [47]

    D. J. Bacon, D. M. Barnett, and R. O. Scatter- good, Anisotropic continuum theory of lattice de- fects., Progress in Materials Science23, 51 (1980)

    work page 1980

  47. [48]

    R. W. Balluffi,Introduction to Elasticity Theory for Crystal Defects(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [49]

    Blin, Energie mutuelle de deux dislocations, Acta Metallurgica3(2), 199 (1955)

    J. Blin, Energie mutuelle de deux dislocations, Acta Metallurgica3(2), 199 (1955)

    work page 1955

  49. [50]

    Mura,Micromechanics of Defects in Solids (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982)

    T. Mura,Micromechanics of Defects in Solids (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982)

    work page 1982

  50. [51]

    N. I. Muskhelishvili,Some Basic Problems Of The Mathematical Theory Of Elasticity(Springer Dor- drecht, 1948)

    work page 1948

  51. [52]

    W. Cai, A. Arsenlis, C. R. Weinberger, and V. V. Bulatov, A non-singular continuum theory of dis- locations, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids54, 561 (2006)

    work page 2006

  52. [53]

    Clouet, L

    E. Clouet, L. Ventelon, and F. Willaime, Dislocation Core Energies and Core Fields from First Principles, Physical Review Letters102, 055502 (2009)

    work page 2009

  53. [54]

    J. Yin, D. M. Barnett, S. P. Fitzgerald, and W. Cai, Computing dislocation stress fields in anisotropic elastic media using fast multipole expansions, Mod- elling and Simulation in Materials Science and En- gineering20, 045015 (2012)

    work page 2012

  54. [55]

    Gao and B

    Y. Gao and B. C. Larson, Displacement fields and self-energies of circular and polygonal dislocation loops in homogeneous and layered anisotropic solids, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids83, 104 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [56]

    S. L. Dudarev and A. P. Sutton, Elastic interactions between nano-scale defects in irradiated materials, Acta Materialia125, 425 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [57]

    Bacon, D

    D. Bacon, D. Barnett, and R. Scattergood, Anisotropic continuum theory of lattice defects, Progress in Materials Science23, 51 (1980)

    work page 1980

  57. [58]

    Braun, C

    J. Braun, C. Ortner, Y. Wang, and L. Zhang, Higher-order Far-field Boundary Conditions for Crystalline Defects (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [59]

    Duque, S

    J. Duque, S. Dudarev, J. Kermode, and T. Hud- son, Code for: ”bridging atomistic and continuum descriptions of nanoscale dislocation loops in tung- sten” (2026)

    work page 2026

  59. [60]

    R. C. Rau, Vacancy dislocation loops in irradiated and annealed tungsten., Phil. Mag.18, 1079 (1968)

    work page 1968

  60. [61]

    V. F. H¨ aussermann, Elektronenmikroskopische Un- tersuchung der Strahlensch¨ adigung durch hochener- getische Goldionen in den kubisch-raumzentrierten Metallen Molybdan und Wolfram, The Philosophi- cal Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimen- tal and Applied Physics25, 583 (1972)

    work page 1972

  61. [62]

    Fukuzumi, T

    S. Fukuzumi, T. Yoshiie, Y. Satoh, Q. Xu, H. Mori, and M. Kawai, Defect structural evolution in high purity tungsten irradiated with electrons using high voltage electron microscope, Journal of Nuclear Ma- terials Proceedings of the 6th International Work- shop on Spallation Materials Technology,343, 308 (2005)

    work page 2005

  62. [63]

    Chen, Y.-H

    Y. Chen, Y.-H. Li, N. Gao, H.-B. Zhou, W. Hu, G.- H. Lu, F. Gao, and H. Deng, New interatomic poten- tials of W, Re and W-Re alloy for radiation defects, Journal of Nuclear Materials502, 141 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [64]

    Das, Recent advances in characterising irradia- tion damage in tungsten for fusion power, SN Ap- plied Sciences1, 1614 (2019)

    S. Das, Recent advances in characterising irradia- tion damage in tungsten for fusion power, SN Ap- plied Sciences1, 1614 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [65]

    Hjorth Larsen, J

    A. Hjorth Larsen, J. Jørgen Mortensen, J. Blomqvist, I. E. Castelli, R. Christensen, M. Du lak, J. Friis, M. N. Groves, B. Ham- mer, C. Hargus, E. D. Hermes, P. C. Jennings, P. Bjerre Jensen, J. Kermode, J. R. Kitchin, E. Leonhard Kolsbjerg, J. Kubal, K. Kaasbjerg, S. Lysgaard, J. Bergmann Maronsson, T. Maxson, T. Olsen, L. Pastewka, A. Peterson, C. Rostg...

    work page 2017

  65. [66]

    Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short- range molecular dynamics, Journal of Computa- tional Physics117, 1 (1995)

    S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short- range molecular dynamics, Journal of Computa- tional Physics117, 1 (1995)

    work page 1995

  66. [67]

    C. A. Becker, F. Tavazza, Z. T. Trautt, and R. A. Buarque de Macedo, Considerations for choosing and using force fields and interatomic potentials in materials science and engineering, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science17, 277 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [68]

    L. M. Hale, Z. T. Trautt, and C. A. Becker, Evalu- ating variability with atomistic simulations: the ef- fect of potential and calculation methodology on the modeling of lattice and elastic constants, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineer- ing26, 055003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  68. [69]

    Hale, Nist interatomic potentials repository (2016)

    L. Hale, Nist interatomic potentials repository (2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [70]

    J. Fu, Y. Chen, J. Fang, N. Gao, W. Hu, C. Jiang, H. Zhou, G. Lu, F. Gao, and H. Deng, Molecular dy- namics simulations of high-energy radiation damage in W and W–Re alloys, Journal of Nuclear Materials 524, 9 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [71]

    B. T. Polyak, The conjugate gradient method in ex- tremal problems, USSR Computational Mathemat- ics and Mathematical Physics9, 94 (1969)

    work page 1969

  71. [72]

    Bitzek, P

    E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. G¨ ahler, M. Moseler, and P. Gumbsch, Structural Relaxation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters97, 170201 (2006)

    work page 2006

  72. [73]

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atom- istic simulation data with OVITO - the Open Visu- alization Tool, Modelling and simulation in materi- als science and engineering18(2010)

    work page 2010

  73. [74]

    H. R. Paneth, The Mechanism of Self-Diffusion in Alkali Metals, Physical Review80, 708 (1950). 18

    work page 1950

  74. [76]

    Grigorev, L

    P. Grigorev, L. Fr´ erot, F. Birks, A. Gola, J. Golebiowski, J. Grießer, J. L. H¨ ormann, A. Kle- menz, G. Moras, W. G. N¨ ohring, J. A. Oldenstaedt, P. Patel, T. Reichenbach, T. Rocke, L. Shenoy, M. Walter, S. Wengert, L. Zhang, J. R. Kermode, and L. Pastewka, matscipy: materials science at the atomic scale with Python, Journal of Open Source Software9, ...

    work page 2024

  75. [77]

    D. M. Barnett, The precise evaluation of derivatives of the anisotropic elastic Green’s functions, Phys. Status Solidi B49, 741 (1972)

    work page 1972

  76. [78]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs (2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [79]

    D. I. Bolef and J. De Klerk, Elastic Constants of Single-Crystal Mo and W between 77°and 500°K, Journal of Applied Physics33, 2311 (1962)

    work page 1962

  78. [80]

    Lowrie and A

    R. Lowrie and A. M. Gonas, Single-Crystal Elastic Properties of Tungsten from 24°to 1800°C, Journal of Applied Physics38, 4505 (1967)

    work page 1967

  79. [81]

    H. Mei, F. Wang, J. Li, and L. Kong, Elastic anisotropy and its temperature dependence for cu- bic crystals revealed by molecular dynamics simu- lations, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Sci- ence and Engineering31, 065013 (2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [82]

    Atomic strain - ovito user manual 3.11.2, https://www.ovito.org/manual/reference/ pipelines/modifiers/atomic_strain.html

    work page

Showing first 80 references.