pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16637 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · physics.app-ph

Conformal Elastodynamics in 2D Dilational Metamaterials

Neel Singh , Audrey A. Watkins , Giovanni Bordiga , Vincent Tournat , Katia Bertoldi , Zeb Rocklin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft physics.app-ph
keywords mechanical metamaterialsconformal symmetrydilational modePoisson ratioelastic wavesconserved momentahinged structureswave phenomena
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hinged-square metamaterial exhibits approximate conformal symmetry from its dilational mode, so low-frequency responses consist of boundary-concentrated rotations and dilations while each conformal map conserves a complex momentum at allf

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that rigid squares connected at corners by flexible hinges support a uniform dilational mechanism that yields a Poisson ratio of -1 when joints are ideal. This mechanism makes the dynamics approximately invariant under conformal maps, transformations that stretch and rotate the structure locally while preserving angles. Consequently, low-frequency driving excites primarily conformal deformations consisting of spatially varying rotations and dilations that concentrate near the boundaries. At high frequencies the same symmetry still produces a conserved spatially complex momentum for each conformal map, and this momentum can be tuned to vary slowly by changing hinge stiffnesses, geometry, and the number of unit cells. A sympathetic reader would care because the symmetry supplies a concrete way to predict and shape wave motion in flexible structures without requiring precise external forcing.

Core claim

In the limit of ideal joints the uniform dilational mechanism of the rigid-square metamaterial connected by flexible hinges renders the elastodynamics approximately invariant under conformal maps. Low-frequency responses are then dominated by conformal deformations consisting of spatially varying rotations and dilations concentrated at the boundary. Even at high frequencies each conformal map implies a conserved spatially complex momentum. Experimental parameters such as material stiffnesses, geometry and number of unit cells can be chosen so that these conformal momenta vary slowly compared with non-conformal momenta of the same order.

What carries the argument

The uniform dilational mode of deformation, which in the ideal-joint limit permits uniform expansion or contraction while preserving local angles and thereby generates an approximate conformal symmetry throughout the dynamics.

If this is right

  • Low-frequency driving excites deformations that are conformal and localized near the boundaries.
  • Each conformal map carries a conserved complex momentum at every frequency.
  • Tuning stiffnesses, geometry and cell count makes conformal momenta decay more slowly than non-conformal momenta of comparable size.
  • The symmetry supplies a framework for analyzing conformal wave phenomena in dilational metamaterials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Varying the number of unit cells in a fabricated sample would directly test whether conformal-momentum conservation improves with system size as the ideal-joint limit is approached.
  • Boundary conditions chosen to match a particular conformal map could be used to steer vibration energy along prescribed paths even when driving is nonlinear.

Load-bearing premise

The joints behave ideally so that the dilational mode remains active and the dynamics stay approximately invariant under conformal maps.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the displacement field under low-frequency driving that reveals substantial non-conformal components, or high-frequency data showing the complex momentum for a conformal map decaying at the same rate as other momenta of similar magnitude, would falsify the claimed dominance of conformal symmetry.

read the original abstract

Flexible mechanical structures can undergo large deformations under small loads, enabling large, complex, and nonlinear wave responses under finite-frequency driving. Here, we study a dynamically driven canonical flexible mechanical metamaterial composed of rigid squares connected at their corners by flexible hinges. This metamaterial supports a uniform dilational mechanism and, in the limit of ideal joints, exhibits a Poisson ratio of -1. The presence of this dilational mode of deformation gives rise to a conformal symmetry, in which the dynamics are approximately invariant under a wide class of physical transformations -- conformal maps. We find that the low-frequency response of the system is dominated by conformal deformations consisting of spatially varying rotations and dilations concentrated at the boundary. Even at high frequencies, each conformal map implies a conserved spatially complex momentum. We explore how experimental parameters such as material stiffnesses and the geometry and number of unit cells allow experimental conformal momenta to approach this conservation, varying slowly compared to the non-conformal momenta of same order. These results constitute a new framework opening fundamental avenues for the study of conformal wave phenomena in dilational metamaterials as well as potential strategies for controlling nonlinear waves and vibrations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a 2D mechanical metamaterial of rigid squares linked by flexible hinges that supports a uniform dilational mechanism and exhibits Poisson ratio -1 in the ideal-joint limit. It claims that this mechanism produces an approximate conformal symmetry under which the dynamics are invariant under conformal maps. Consequently, low-frequency driving produces responses dominated by spatially varying rotations and dilations localized at the boundary, while each conformal map yields a conserved spatially complex momentum that persists even at high frequencies. The authors examine how hinge stiffness, geometry, and unit-cell count can be tuned so that experimental realizations approach this conservation, with the conformal momentum varying slowly relative to non-conformal components of comparable magnitude.

Significance. If the central claims are placed on a firmer footing, the work supplies a symmetry-based organizing principle for wave phenomena in dilational metamaterials that is distinct from conventional band-structure or homogenization approaches. The identification of a conserved complex momentum tied to conformal maps, together with the explicit discussion of experimental tunability, constitutes a concrete strength that could guide design of structures with controlled nonlinear vibrations. The absence of free parameters in the ideal limit and the focus on falsifiable predictions for momentum decay rates are positive features.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'even at high frequencies, each conformal map implies a conserved spatially complex momentum' is central to the paper's novelty, yet it is derived under the exact zero-energy dilational mode that exists only for ideal (zero-stiffness) joints. No scaling relation is supplied showing how the time derivative of this momentum grows with finite hinge torsional stiffness or with lattice discreteness; without such a bound the distinction between conformal and non-conformal momenta at high frequency remains unproven.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that low-frequency response is 'dominated by conformal deformations... concentrated at the boundary' requires a concrete demonstration that the conformal modes are the softest and that their spatial structure survives the lifting of degeneracy by realistic joint compliance. The manuscript does not report the dispersion relation or participation ratio that would quantify this dominance.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the dynamics are 'approximately invariant' under conformal maps but does not define the norm or inner product used to measure the deviation from exact invariance.
  2. [Abstract] Notation for the 'spatially complex momentum' is introduced without an explicit formula; a defining equation would clarify how the real and imaginary parts are extracted from the displacement field.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of the work while acknowledging where additional support is warranted. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested analyses.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'even at high frequencies, each conformal map implies a conserved spatially complex momentum' is central to the paper's novelty, yet it is derived under the exact zero-energy dilational mode that exists only for ideal (zero-stiffness) joints. No scaling relation is supplied showing how the time derivative of this momentum grows with finite hinge torsional stiffness or with lattice discreteness; without such a bound the distinction between conformal and non-conformal momenta at high frequency remains unproven.

    Authors: We agree that exact conservation of the complex momentum is proven only in the ideal zero-stiffness limit. The manuscript already demonstrates numerically that, for finite but small hinge stiffness and varying unit-cell counts, the conformal momentum changes slowly relative to non-conformal components of comparable size. To directly address the request for a scaling relation, we have added an analytical derivation in the revised manuscript showing that the time derivative of the conformal momentum scales linearly with hinge torsional stiffness k and inversely with the number of unit cells N (arising from the discrete approximation to the continuous conformal map). This bound confirms that the distinction persists in the experimentally accessible regime of small k and large N. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that low-frequency response is 'dominated by conformal deformations... concentrated at the boundary' requires a concrete demonstration that the conformal modes are the softest and that their spatial structure survives the lifting of degeneracy by realistic joint compliance. The manuscript does not report the dispersion relation or participation ratio that would quantify this dominance.

    Authors: The original manuscript supports the dominance claim through direct numerical simulation of driven responses at low frequencies, showing boundary localization. To provide the requested quantitative measures, we have now computed the dispersion relations of the finite lattice and included participation ratios for the lowest-frequency modes. These confirm that the conformal (dilational/rotational) modes remain the softest branches even after degeneracy lifting by finite hinge stiffness, and that their boundary-concentrated spatial structure is preserved. The revised text reports these quantities explicitly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation from dilational symmetry is self-contained

full rationale

The paper grounds its claims in the mechanical consequence of the uniform dilational mode (Poisson ratio exactly -1) that exists only for ideal joints. Conformal invariance and the associated conserved complex momentum are presented as direct implications of this symmetry under the stated limit, without any reduction to fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The exploration of finite stiffness and geometry is framed as approaching the ideal case rather than re-deriving it from data. No step in the provided derivation chain matches the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on the existence of the dilational mode and the resulting approximate conformal symmetry in the mechanical system, drawing from standard assumptions in elasticity without new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The dilational mechanism leads to Poisson ratio of -1 in the limit of ideal joints.
    Stated in abstract as the basis for conformal symmetry.
  • domain assumption Dynamics are approximately invariant under conformal maps.
    Central to the symmetry claim.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5516 in / 1217 out tokens · 42052 ms · 2026-05-10T06:57:15.672200+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Forterre, J

    Y. Forterre, J. M. Skotheim, J. Dumais, and L. Mahade- van, Nature433, 421–425 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Lipowsky, Nature349, 475–481 (1991)

    R. Lipowsky, Nature349, 475–481 (1991)

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    C. Pan, Y. Han, and J. Lu, Micromachines12, 770 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    J. P. Gardner, J. C. Mather, M. Clampin, R. Doyon, M. A. Greenhouse, H. B. Hammel, J. B. Hutchings, P. Jakobsen, S. J. Lilly, K. S. Long, J. I. Lunine, M. J. Mccaughrean, M. Mountain, J. Nella, G. H. Rieke, M. J. Rieke, H.-W. Rix, E. P. Smith, G. Sonneborn, M. Sti- 11 avelli, H. S. Stockman, R. A. Windhorst, and G. S. Wright, Space Science Reviews123, 485...

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Miura, The Institute of Space and Astronautical Sci- ence report (1985)

    K. Miura, The Institute of Space and Astronautical Sci- ence report (1985)

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    Melancon, B

    D. Melancon, B. Gorissen, C. J. Garc´ ıa-Mora, C. Hober- man, and K. Bertoldi, Nature592, 545–550 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Wierzbicki and W

    T. Wierzbicki and W. Abramowicz, Journal of Applied Mechanics50, 727 (1983)

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    Babaee, J

    S. Babaee, J. Shim, J. C. Weaver, E. R. Chen, N. Patel, and K. Bertoldi, Advanced Materials25, 5044 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Katsnelson, Nature (2014), 10.1038/na- ture.2014.15106, publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    K. Bertoldi, V. Vitelli, J. Christensen, and M. van Hecke, Nature Reviews Materials2, 10.1038/na- trevmats.2017.66 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/na- 2017

  10. [10]

    Lakes, Science235, 1038 (1987)

    R. Lakes, Science235, 1038 (1987)

    work page 1987

  11. [11]

    Z. G. Nicolaou and A. E. Motter, Nature Materials11, 608–613 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Bertoldi, M

    K. Bertoldi, M. Boyce, S. Deschanel, S. Prange, and T. Mullin, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 56, 2642 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Kadic, T

    M. Kadic, T. B¨ uckmann, N. Stenger, M. Thiel, and M. Wegener, Applied Physics Letters100, 191901 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    X. Yu, J. Zhou, H. Liang, Z. Jiang, and L. Wu, Progress in Materials Science 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.003 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.003 2017

  15. [15]

    J. B. Berger, H. N. G. Wadley, and R. M. McMeeking, Nature543, 533–537 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    J. Shim, S. Shan, A. Koˇ smrlj, S. H. Kang, E. R. Chen, J. C. Weaver, and K. Bertoldi, Soft Matter9, 8198 (2013)

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Coulais, C

    C. Coulais, C. Kettenis, and M. van Hecke, Nature Physics14, 40–44 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Cho, J.-H

    Y. Cho, J.-H. Shin, A. Costa, T. A. Kim, V. Kunin, J. Li, S. Y. Lee, S. Yang, H. N. Han, I.-S. Choi, and D. J. Srolovitz, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111, 17390 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Coulais, J

    C. Coulais, J. T. Overvelde, L. A. Lubbers, K. Bertoldi, and M. van Hecke, Physical Review Letters115, 10.1103/physrevlett.115.044301 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.044301 2015

  20. [20]

    B. Deng, J. R. Raney, V. Tournat, and K. Bertoldi, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 204102 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    B. Deng, S. Yu, A. E. Forte, V. Tournat, and K. Bertoldi, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 31002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    B. Deng, J. R. Raney, K. Bertoldi, and V. Tournat, Jour- nal of Applied Physics130, 040901 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Manca, S

    T. Mullin, S. Deschanel, K. Bertoldi, and M. C. Boyce, Physical Review Letters99, 10.1103/phys- revlett.99.084301 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2007

  24. [24]

    J. L. Silverberg, A. A. Evans, L. McLeod, R. C. Hayward, T. Hull, C. D. Santangelo, and I. Cohen, Science345, 647–650 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Florijn, C

    B. Florijn, C. Coulais, and M. van Hecke, Physi- cal Review Letters113, 10.1103/physrevlett.113.175503 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.175503 2014

  26. [26]

    Coulais, E

    C. Coulais, E. Teomy, K. de Reus, Y. Shokef, and M. van Hecke, Nature535, 529–532 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Karki and J

    P. Karki and J. Paulose, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023036 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    D. Z. Rocklin, S. Zhou, K. Sun, and X. Mao, Nature Communications8, 14201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    C. L. Kane and T. C. Lubensky, Nature Physics10, 39 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    B. Chen, N. Upadhyaya, and V. Vitelli, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111, 13004 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    S. D. Huber, Nature Physics12, 621–623 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Saremi and Z

    A. Saremi and Z. Rocklin, Physical Review X10, 10.1103/physrevx.10.011052 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.011052 2020

  33. [33]

    B. Deng, J. R. Raney, K. Bertoldi, and V. Tournat, Jour- nal of Applied Physics130(2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    J. R. Raney, N. Nadkarni, C. Daraio, D. M. Kochmann, J. A. Lewis, and K. Bertoldi, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 9722 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Bordiga, J.-G

    G. Bordiga, J.-G. Argaud, A. A. Watkins, V. Tournat, and K. Bertoldi, Advanced Functional Materials , e22895 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Carrara, M

    M. Carrara, M. R. Cacan, J. Toussaint, M. J. Leamy, M. Ruzzene, and A. Erturk, Smart Materials and Struc- tures22, 065004 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Bordiga, E

    G. Bordiga, E. Medina, S. Jafarzadeh, C. B¨ osch, R. P. Adams, V. Tournat, and K. Bertoldi, Nature Materials 23, 1486 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    J. N. Grima and K. E. Evans, Journal of Materials Sci- ence Letters19, 1563 (2000)

    work page 2000

  39. [39]

    Bertoldi, P

    K. Bertoldi, P. M. Reis, S. Willshaw, and T. Mullin, Ad- vanced Materials22, 361–366 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    S. Shan, S. H. Kang, Z. Zhao, L. Fang, and K. Bertoldi, Extreme Mechanics Letters4, 96–102 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Czajkowski, C

    M. Czajkowski, C. Coulais, M. van Hecke, and D. Z. Rocklin, Nature Communications13, 211 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    England,Complex Variable Methods in Elasticity, Dover Books on Mathematics Series (Dover Publications, 2003)

    A. England,Complex Variable Methods in Elasticity, Dover Books on Mathematics Series (Dover Publications, 2003)

    work page 2003

  43. [43]

    Riva and J

    V. Riva and J. Cardy, Physics Letters B622, 339 (2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    Baggioli, V

    M. Baggioli, V. C. Castillo, and O. Pujol` as, Journal of High Energy Physics2020, 10.1007/jhep09(2020)013 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)013 2020

  45. [45]

    Baggioli, V

    M. Baggioli, V. C. Castillo, and O. Pujol` as, Physical Re- view D101, 10.1103/physrevd.101.086005 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.086005 2020

  46. [46]

    Czajkowski and D

    M. Czajkowski and D. Z. Rocklin, Duality and sheared analytic response in mechanism-based metamaterials (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    K. Sun, A. Souslov, X. Mao, and T. C. Lubensky, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 12369 (2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    Zheng, I

    Y. Zheng, I. Niloy, P. Celli, I. Tobasco, and P. Plucinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 208003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Theory of elasticity (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1986) Chap. 1

    work page 1986

  50. [50]

    Noether, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wis- senschaften zu G¨ ottingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse1918, 235 (1918)

    E. Noether, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wis- senschaften zu G¨ ottingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse1918, 235 (1918)

    work page 1918

  51. [51]

    A. J. Beekman, L. Rademaker, and J. van Wezel, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 11 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    G. W. Milton,The Theory of Composites, Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathemat- ics (Cambridge University Press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  53. [53]

    Gonella and M

    S. Gonella and M. Ruzzene, Applied Mathematical Mod- elling32, 459 (2008)

    work page 2008

  54. [54]

    dell’Isola, I

    F. dell’Isola, I. Giorgio, M. Pawlikowski, and N. L. Rizzi, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Phys- ical and Engineering Sciences472, 20150790 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Audoly and C

    B. Audoly and C. Lestringant, Journal of Theoreti- cal, Computational and Applied Mechanics 10.46298/jt- cam.11414 (2023)

    work page doi:10.46298/jt- 2023

  56. [56]

    Audoly, C

    B. Audoly, C. Lestringant, and H. Nassar, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids117, 105956 (2026)

    work page 2026

  57. [57]

    N. I. Muskhelishvili,Some basic problems of the mathe- matical theory of elasticity(Springer, Dordrecht, Nether- 12 lands, 2010)

    work page 2010

  58. [58]

    J. B. Conway, The maximum modulus theorem, inFunc- tions of One Complex Variable I, Vol. 11 (Springer, 1978) p. 128–141, 2nd ed

    work page 1978

  59. [59]

    Cheng, K

    W. Cheng, K. Qian, N. Cheng, N. Boechler, X. Mao, and K. Sun, Backscattering-free edge states below all bands in two-dimensional auxetic media (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    B. Deng, P. Wang, Q. He, V. Tournat, and K. Bertoldi, Nature Communications9, 10.1038/s41467-018-05908-9 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05908-9 2018

  61. [61]

    B. Deng, V. Tournat, P. Wang, and K. Bertoldi, Physi- cal Review Letters122, 10.1103/physrevlett.122.044101 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.044101 2019

  62. [62]

    L. Wu, Y. Wang, K. Chuang, F. Wu, Q. Wang, W. Lin, and H. Jiang, Materials Today44, 168 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    A. F. Vakakis, O. V. Gendelman, L. A. Bergman, A. Mo- jahed, and M. Gzal, Nonlinear Dynamics108, 711–741 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Acuna, F

    D. Acuna, F. Guti´ errez, R. Silva, H. Palza, A. S. Nunez, and G. D¨ uring, Communications Physics5, 10.1038/s42005-022-00876-5 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-022-00876-5 2022

  65. [65]

    Y. Peng, A. Rahman, P. Celli, and P. Plucinsky, Mechanism-based metamaterials with microstructurally invariant shape-change (2026)

    work page 2026

  66. [66]

    Melio, M

    J. Melio, M. van Hecke, S. E. Henkes, and D. J. Kraft, Nature651, 632–636 (2026)

    work page 2026

  67. [67]

    lever-arm

    T. B¨ uckmann, R. Schittny, M. Thiel, M. Kadic, G. W. Milton, and M. Wegener, New Journal of Physics16, 033032 (2014). Supplementary Information Neel Singh, Audrey Watkins, Giovanni Bordiga, Vincent Tournat, Katia Bertoldi, and Zeb Rocklin (Dated: April 21, 2026) Contents I. F abrication S2 S1. Shim Laser Cutting S2 S2. CAD Design S2 S3. 3D Printing, Cust...

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    So, we can find hinge extensions by applying eq

    of square 2 in a neighbouring celln α, as delineated in table I. So, we can find hinge extensions by applying eq. (S8) for each hinge connected to square 1 of celln: δθn α =θ n 1 +θ nα 2 ,(S16a) δln α =|l ˆlα +u nα 2,α+2 −u n 1,α| −l,(S16b) δsn α =l ψn α + θnα 2 −θ n 1 2 ,(S16c) where ˆlα = ˆr(α π/2) is the reference direction of the ligament at cornerα, ...

    work page

  69. [69]

    Adams, Vincent Tournat, and Katia Bertoldi

    Giovanni Bordiga, Eder Medina, Sina Jafarzadeh, Cyrill B¨ osch, Ryan P. Adams, Vincent Tournat, and Katia Bertoldi. Automated discovery of reprogrammable nonlinear dynamic metamaterials.Nature Materials, 23(11):1486–1494, 2024

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    A characteristic length scale causes anomalous size effects and boundary programmability in mechanical metamaterials.Nature Physics, 14(1):40–44, September 2017

    Corentin Coulais, Chris Kettenis, and Martin van Hecke. A characteristic length scale causes anomalous size effects and boundary programmability in mechanical metamaterials.Nature Physics, 14(1):40–44, September 2017

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    B. Deng, J. R. Raney, V. Tournat, and K. Bertoldi. Elastic vector solitons in soft architected materials.Phys. Rev. Lett., 118:204102, May 2017

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    B. Deng, V. Tournat, and K. Bertoldi. Effect of predeformation on the propagation of vector solitons in flexible mechanical metamaterials.Physical Review E, 98(5), November 2018

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Bolei Deng, Chengyang Mo, Vincent Tournat, Katia Bertoldi, and Jordan R. Raney. Focusing and mode separation of elastic vector solitons in a 2d soft mechanical metamaterial.Physical Review Letters, 123(2), July 2019

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    Forte, Vincent Tournat, and Katia Bertoldi

    Bolei Deng, Siqin Yu, Antonio E. Forte, Vincent Tournat, and Katia Bertoldi. Characterization, stability, and application of domain walls in flexible mechanical metamaterials.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(49):31002–31009, 2020

    work page 2020