pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16650 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR· gr-qc

Neutron star atmospheres composed of fusion ashes

Valery F. Suleimanov , Juri Poutanen , Klaus Werner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SRgr-qc
keywords neutron star atmospheresthermonuclear ashesX-ray burstsabsorption edgesradiation pressureopacity modelingCompton scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fusion-ash layers on neutron stars develop a radiation-pressure boost in the transition region that caps the maximum bolometric flux for given gravity and composition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs models of hot neutron star atmospheres using four ash mixtures dominated by helium, chromium, iron or nickel to study thermonuclear flashes on X-ray bursting stars. It adds photoionization from excited states plus roughly 5000 spectral lines to the opacity sources and introduces a method that treats Compton scattering simultaneously with those lines. The central finding is a distinct atmospheric layer between the optically thin and thick regions where the radiation-pressure force rises sharply, imposing an upper limit on attainable flux. The resulting spectra show prominent absorption edges whose energies track the dominant element. These models are then fitted with a simple diluted blackbody plus one edge and compared against observed bursts that display such edges.

Core claim

The modeled atmospheres exhibit a layer in the transition region between optically thin and optically thick parts where the radiation-pressure force increases significantly. This enhanced force sets an upper limit on the maximum attainable bolometric flux for a given surface gravity and chemical composition. The emergent spectra display pronounced absorption edges whose energies are set by the dominant chemical species in the ash mixture.

What carries the argument

The radiation-pressure force enhancement layer that forms in the optically thin-to-thick transition region due to the detailed opacity calculation.

If this is right

  • The maximum bolometric flux is bounded by surface gravity and the specific ash composition.
  • Spectra are well approximated by a diluted blackbody modified by a single absorption edge.
  • The dilution factor and edge energy in the fits vary systematically with relative flux and chemical composition.
  • Observed absorption edges in bursts from systems such as HETE J1900.1-2455 and GRS 1747-312 can place direct constraints on atmospheric composition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The flux caps may help account for the observed upper envelope of luminosities in some X-ray burst samples.
  • Higher-resolution X-ray spectroscopy could test whether the predicted edge positions and depths match real burst data.
  • Extending the same opacity treatment to mixed or time-evolving ash compositions would check how robust the flux limits remain across burst sequences.

Load-bearing premise

The models assume that the four chosen ash mixtures and the new treatment of excited-state photoionization together with thousands of lines handled simultaneously with Compton scattering accurately represent the actual surface physics.

What would settle it

An observed X-ray burst whose peak flux exceeds the predicted limit for a matching surface gravity and one of the modeled compositions, or spectra lacking absorption edges at the energies expected for the dominant ash species.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16650 by Juri Poutanen, Klaus Werner, Valery F. Suleimanov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectra of emergent radiation (so called Eddington flux, HE = FE/4π) from NS model atmospheres with ash2 chemical composition. The upper panel corresponds to ℓ = 0.5 and the lower panel to ℓ = 0.1. The red and blue curves correspond to the models that include and omit Compton scattering, respectively. The photoionization edges of various chemical elements are marked. Here σSB is Stefan-Boltzmann constant, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distributions of the relative ion densities with depth for model atmospheres of chemical composition ash2, ℓ = 0.1, log g = 14.3. The top, middle, and bottom panel correspond to iron, chromium, and titanium, respectively. Article number, page 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variation of the spectral distribution of the radiation pressure acceleration Egrad(E) given by Eq. (6) (top panel) and the net flux EFE (bottom panel) with atmospheric depth. The chemical composition and other parameters of the model atmosphere are shown in the top panel. tion opacity within the spectral bin with the same division into 50 sub-bins. However, in this case, the significance of opacity in spe… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Emergent spectra for the models presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Emergent spectra of the models composed of a plasma with ash2 composition (Xash mass fraction) mixed with solar abundance plasma (A = 0.01, 1 − Xash mass fraction). The effective temperature is fixed and corresponds to ℓ = 0.1 for Xash = 1. where µ is the cosine of the angle between the surface normal and the direction of radiation propagation, I(E, µ) and S (E, µ) are the specific intensity and the source… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: ). The temperature structure and distribution of the rela￾tive radiation pressure force grad/g across the atmosphere, calcu￾lated for an atmosphere consisting of pure iron, are also shown. They are virtually identical to the results for ash4. The signif￾icance of the levitating layer increases with the transition from composition ash2 to ash3 and to ash4 (see an example in the bottom panel of [PITH_FULL_I… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: ). However, at lower relative fluxes, the fitting parame￾3 https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/software/xspec/manual/ node252.html [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Dependence of the absorption edge fit parameters on the rela￾tive flux for models with the same chemical composition as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Dependence of the fit parameters on the relative bolometric flux for various chemical composition. The blue, red, and black curves correspond to models ash1, pure helium, and solar H/He mix with sub￾solar heavy elements abundances (A = 0.01), respectively. Article number, page 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Here we present models of hot neutron star (NS) atmospheres consisting of thermonuclear ashes of various chemical compositions. These models are essential for studying thermonuclear flashes in X-ray bursting NSs in which nuclear-burning ashes are transported to the stellar surface. We consider four different mixtures, each dominated by helium, chromium, iron, or nickel. In addition to the opacity sources previously used in NS atmosphere modeling, we include photoionization from excited ionic states as well as approximately 5000 spectral lines. We also develop a method that enables the simultaneous treatment of Compton scattering and a large number of spectral lines. A key feature of the modeled NS atmospheres is the presence of a layer in the transition region between the optically thin and optically thick parts of the atmosphere where the radiation-pressure force increases significantly. This enhanced force sets an upper limit on the maximum attainable bolometric flux for a given surface gravity and chemical composition. The emergent spectra from the computed atmospheres display pronounced absorption edges, whose energies are determined by the dominant chemical species. We fit the model spectra using a diluted blackbody modified by a single absorption edge, and we investigate how the fit parameters depend on both the relative bolometric flux and the chemical composition of the atmosphere. Finally, we discuss constraints on these models imposed by the properties of X-ray bursts that exhibit absorption edges in their spectra, as observed in the systems HETE~J1900.1$-$2455 and GRS~1747$-$312.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops radiative-transfer models for hot neutron star atmospheres composed of thermonuclear fusion ashes in four mixtures (He-, Cr-, Fe-, or Ni-dominated). It augments standard opacities with photoionization from excited ionic states and ~5000 spectral lines, and introduces a numerical method for the simultaneous treatment of Compton scattering and multiple lines. The central result is the identification of a layer in the optically thin-to-thick transition region where the radiation-pressure force increases sharply; this enhancement imposes an upper limit on the maximum attainable bolometric flux for given surface gravity and composition. Emergent spectra exhibit pronounced absorption edges whose energies track the dominant species; these are fitted with a diluted blackbody modified by a single edge, and the dependence of fit parameters on flux and composition is examined. Implications for X-ray bursts showing edges (HETE J1900.1-2455, GRS 1747-312) are discussed.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, the work supplies a physically grounded mechanism for flux ceilings in bursting neutron stars and a template for interpreting edge features, thereby offering constraints on surface ash composition and atmospheric structure. The detailed atomic opacity treatment and coupled scattering solver constitute a technical advance over prior NS atmosphere calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. [description of the numerical method and key feature (abstract and methods)] The central claim that the radiation-pressure force rises sharply in the transition layer and thereby sets an upper bolometric-flux limit rests on the accuracy of the new simultaneous Compton + multi-line opacity solver in the semi-transparent regime. The manuscript provides no validation tests (analytic limits, cross-code comparisons, or convergence studies) or error analysis for the force integration in this regime, which is load-bearing for the reported flux ceilings.
  2. [model setup and results on flux limits] The four specific ash mixtures and the assumption that the added photoionization and ~5000-line treatment accurately capture the physics are taken as given; no sensitivity tests to alternative compositions or to possible systematic biases in line sampling/frequency redistribution are shown. An error here would directly shift the predicted flux limits and edge properties without affecting the remainder of the model.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract and methods] The abstract states 'approximately 5000 spectral lines' without specifying selection criteria or exact count; this detail should be stated explicitly in the methods for reproducibility.
  2. [spectral fitting section] Quantitative trends in the diluted-blackbody-plus-edge fit parameters versus relative flux and composition are described but would benefit from a summary table or figure panel showing the dependence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and positive assessment of the work's significance. We address the two major comments below, agreeing that additional validation and sensitivity information will strengthen the manuscript. Revisions will be made accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the radiation-pressure force rises sharply in the transition layer and thereby sets an upper bolometric-flux limit rests on the accuracy of the new simultaneous Compton + multi-line opacity solver in the semi-transparent regime. The manuscript provides no validation tests (analytic limits, cross-code comparisons, or convergence studies) or error analysis for the force integration in this regime, which is load-bearing for the reported flux ceilings.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the new solver is essential to support the central claim. The method was developed with internal consistency checks against limiting cases (e.g., pure Compton scattering recovering the expected equilibrium), but these were not documented in the submitted manuscript. In the revised version we will add a dedicated validation subsection in the Methods, including: (i) recovery of analytic limits for Compton-only and line-only cases, (ii) convergence tests varying the frequency grid resolution and the number of lines retained, and (iii) numerical error estimates on the integrated radiation force in the transition layer. This will directly address the robustness of the reported flux ceilings. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The four specific ash mixtures and the assumption that the added photoionization and ~5000-line treatment accurately capture the physics are taken as given; no sensitivity tests to alternative compositions or to possible systematic biases in line sampling/frequency redistribution are shown. An error here would directly shift the predicted flux limits and edge properties without affecting the remainder of the model.

    Authors: The four mixtures were chosen to represent the dominant species expected from rp-process ashes in X-ray bursts, as motivated in the Introduction and referenced to prior nuclear-burning calculations. We acknowledge the absence of explicit sensitivity tests. In revision we will add results showing the effect of subsampling the line list (retaining 50 % and 20 % of the lines) on the location of the radiation-pressure layer, the maximum flux, and the edge energies. We will also briefly discuss the frequency-redistribution approximation used in the solver and its expected impact. A full exploration of every possible ash composition or every conceivable line-sampling bias lies beyond the scope of a single paper; the present choices already demonstrate the dependence on atomic number. We therefore classify this as a partial revision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in forward numerical modeling of NS atmospheres

full rationale

The paper computes atmospheric structures via numerical radiative transfer for four specified ash compositions, incorporating external atomic data for photoionization, ~5000 lines, and a newly developed simultaneous Compton-plus-lines solver. The reported layer of enhanced radiation-pressure force in the thin-to-thick transition and the resulting upper bolometric-flux limits are direct numerical outputs of these calculations rather than quantities fitted or defined in terms of themselves. No equations reduce predictions to inputs by construction, no load-bearing self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or ansatzes, and the central claims remain independent of the target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard radiative-transfer and hydrostatic assumptions plus chosen ash compositions and extended opacity tables; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • ash mixture compositions
    Four specific dominant-element mixtures (He, Cr, Fe, Ni) are selected as inputs based on expected thermonuclear products.
  • number of spectral lines
    Approximately 5000 lines are included as an approximation to the full line list.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of plane-parallel hydrostatic equilibrium and radiative transfer in NS atmospheres
    Invoked to compute the atmospheric structure and emergent spectra.
  • domain assumption Atomic physics data for photoionization from excited states and line opacities are sufficiently accurate
    Required for the new opacity sources to produce reliable edges and force profiles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5571 in / 1523 out tokens · 48253 ms · 2026-05-10T07:07:34.360815+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

    work page

  3. [3]

    Arnaud , K. A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser., Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes (San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pac.), 17--20

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    J., & Scott , P

    Asplund , M., Grevesse , N., Sauval , A. J., & Scott , P. 2009, , 47, 481

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Cowley , C. R. 1971, The Observatory, 91, 139

    work page 1971

  6. [6]

    & Suleimanov , V

    Degenaar , N. & Suleimanov , V. F. 2018, in ASSL, Vol. 457, The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars, ed. L. Rezzolla , P. Pizzochero , D. I. Jones , N. Rea , & I. Vida \ n a , 185--253

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    P., Young , P

    Del Zanna , G., Dere , K. P., Young , P. R., & Landi , E. 2021, , 909, 38

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    P., Landi , E., Mason , H

    Dere , K. P., Landi , E., Mason , H. E., Monsignori Fossi , B. C., & Young , P. R. 1997, , 125, 149

    work page 1997

  9. [9]

    2024, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed

    Di Salvo , T., Papitto , A., Marino , A., Iaria , R., & Burderi , L. 2024, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed. C. Bambi & A. Santangelo (Singapore: Springer), 4031--4103

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    1987, , 39, 287

    Ebisuzaki , T. 1987, , 39, 287

    work page 1987

  11. [11]

    L., Schatz , H., & Thielemann , F.-K

    Fisker , J. L., Schatz , H., & Thielemann , F.-K. 2008, , 174, 261

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Galloway , D. K. & Keek , L. 2021, in ASSL, Vol. 461, Timing Neutron Stars: Pulsations, Oscillations and Explosions, ed. T. M. Belloni , M. M \'e ndez , & C. Zhang , 209--262

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    K., Muno , M

    Galloway , D. K., Muno , M. P., Hartman , J. M., Psaltis , D., & Chakrabarty , D. 2008, , 179, 360

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    Griem , H. R. 1960, , 132, 883

    work page 1960

  15. [15]

    Griem , H. R. 1967, , 148, 547

    work page 1967

  16. [16]

    2021, , 914, 49

    Guichandut , S., Cumming , A., Falanga , M., Li , Z., & Zamfir , M. 2021, , 914, 49

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    2020, , 638, A107

    Herrera , Y., Sala , G., & Jos \'e , J. 2020, , 638, A107

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    2023, , 678, A156

    Herrera , Y., Sala , G., & Jos \'e , J. 2023, , 678, A156

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    G., & Lanz , T

    Hubeny , I., Hummer , D. G., & Lanz , T. 1994, , 282, 151

    work page 1994

  20. [20]

    Hummer , D. G. & Mihalas , D. 1988, , 331, 794

    work page 1988

  21. [21]

    A., Suleimanov , V

    Ibragimov , A. A., Suleimanov , V. F., Vikhlinin , A., & Sakhibullin , N. A. 2003, Astronomy Reports, 47, 186

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    in't Zand , J. J. M. & Weinberg , N. N. 2010, , 520, A81

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    K., Chenevez , J., Strohmayer , T

    Jaisawal , G. K., Chenevez , J., Strohmayer , T. E., et al. 2025, , 986, 16

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    2010, , 189, 204

    Jos \'e , J., Moreno , F., Parikh , A., & Iliadis , C. 2010, , 189, 204

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    a ttil \

    Kajava , J. J. E., N \"a ttil \"a , J., Latvala , O.-M., et al. 2014, , 445, 4218

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    a ttil \

    Kajava , J. J. E., N \"a ttil \"a , J., Poutanen , J., et al. 2017, , 464, L6

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Karzas , W. J. & Latter , R. 1961, , 6, 167

    work page 1961

  28. [28]

    1993, ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid

    Kurucz , R. 1993, ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid. Kurucz CD-ROM No. 13. Cambridge, 13

    work page 1993

  29. [29]

    Kurucz , R. L. 1970, SAO Special Report, 309

    work page 1970

  30. [30]

    I., Sunyaev , R

    Lapidus , I. I., Sunyaev , R. A., & Titarchuk , L. G. 1986, Sov. Astr. Lett., 12, 383

    work page 1986

  31. [31]

    Lewin , W. H. G., van Paradijs , J., & Taam , R. E. 1993, , 62, 223

    work page 1993

  32. [32]

    F., Poutanen , J., et al

    Li , Z., Suleimanov , V. F., Poutanen , J., et al. 2018, , 866, 53

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    A., Taam , R

    London , R. A., Taam , R. E., & Howard , W. M. 1986, , 306, 170

    work page 1986

  34. [34]

    C., Lamb , F

    Miller , M. C., Lamb , F. K., Dittmann , A. J., et al. 2019, , 887, L24

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    C., Lamb , F

    Miller , M. C., Lamb , F. K., Dittmann , A. J., et al. 2021, , 918, L28

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    a ttil \

    N \"a ttil \"a , J., Miller , M. C., Steiner , A. W., et al. 2017, , 608, A31

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    a ttil \

    N \"a ttil \"a , J., Steiner , A. W., Kajava , J. J. E., Suleimanov , V. F., & Poutanen , J. 2016, , 591, A25

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    a ttil \

    N \"a ttil \"a , J., Suleimanov , V. F., Kajava , J. J. E., & Poutanen , J. 2015, , 581, A83

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    1994, , 433, 276

    Nobili , L., Turolla , R., & Lapidus , I. 1994, , 433, 276

    work page 1994

  40. [40]

    & Freire , P

    \"O zel , F. & Freire , P. 2016, , 54, 401

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    1983, , 267, 315

    Paczynski , B. 1983, , 267, 315

    work page 1983

  42. [42]

    & Proszynski , M

    Paczynski , B. & Proszynski , M. 1986, , 302, 519

    work page 1986

  43. [43]

    2017, , 850, 106

    Patruno , A., Haskell , B., & Andersson , N. 2017, , 850, 106

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    2017, , 835, 119

    Poutanen , J. 2017, , 835, 119

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    & Svensson , R

    Poutanen , J. & Svensson , R. 1996, , 470, 249

    work page 1996

  46. [46]

    S., & Najarro , F

    Puls , J., Vink , J. S., & Najarro , F. 2008, , 16, 209

    work page 2008

  47. [47]

    E., Watts , A

    Riley , T. E., Watts , A. L., Bogdanov , S., et al. 2019, , 887, L21

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    E., Watts , A

    Riley , T. E., Watts , A. L., Ray , P. S., et al. 2021, , 918, L27

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    J., Yan , Y., Mihalas , D., & Pradhan , A

    Seaton , M. J., Yan , Y., Mihalas , D., & Pradhan , A. K. 1994, , 266, 805

    work page 1994

  50. [50]

    & Bildsten , L

    Strohmayer , T. & Bildsten , L. 2006, in Cambridge Astrophysics Series, Vol. 39, Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. Lewin & M. van der Klis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 113--156

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    E., Altamirano , D., Arzoumanian , Z., et al

    Strohmayer , T. E., Altamirano , D., Arzoumanian , Z., et al. 2019, , 878, L27

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    2011 a , , 742, 122

    Suleimanov , V., Poutanen , J., Revnivtsev , M., & Werner , K. 2011 a , , 742, 122

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    2011 b , , 527, A139

    Suleimanov , V., Poutanen , J., & Werner , K. 2011 b , , 527, A139

    work page 2011

  54. [54]

    2012, , 545, A120

    Suleimanov , V., Poutanen , J., & Werner , K. 2012, , 545, A120

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    F., Kajava , J

    Suleimanov , V. F., Kajava , J. J. E., Molkov , S. V., et al. 2017 a , , 472, 3905

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    F., Klochkov , D., Pavlov , G

    Suleimanov , V. F., Klochkov , D., Pavlov , G. G., & Werner , K. 2014, , 210, 13

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    F., Poutanen , J., Klochkov , D., & Werner , K

    Suleimanov , V. F., Poutanen , J., Klochkov , D., & Werner , K. 2016, European Physical Journal A, 52, 20

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    a ttil \

    Suleimanov , V. F., Poutanen , J., N \"a ttil \"a , J., et al. 2017 b , , 466, 906

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    F., Tavleev , A

    Suleimanov , V. F., Tavleev , A. S., Doroshenko , V., & Werner , K. 2024, , 688, A39

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    A., Ferland , G

    Verner , D. A., Ferland , G. J., Korista , K. T., & Yakovlev , D. G. 1996, , 465, 487

    work page 1996

  61. [61]

    Watts , A. L. 2012, , 50, 609

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    N., Bildsten , L., & Schatz , H

    Weinberg , N. N., Bildsten , L., & Schatz , H. 2006, , 639, 1018

    work page 2006

  63. [63]

    E., Heger , A., Cumming , A., et al

    Woosley , S. E., Heger , A., Cumming , A., et al. 2004, , 151, 75

    work page 2004

  64. [64]

    & Weinberg , N

    Yu , H. & Weinberg , N. N. 2018, , 863, 53

    work page 2018