pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17213 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · 🧮 math.OC · cs.SY· eess.SY· stat.ML

Symplectic Inductive Bias for Data-Driven Target Reachability in Hamiltonian Systems

Zhuo Ouyang , Jixian Liu , Enrique Mallada This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC cs.SYeess.SYstat.ML
keywords Hamiltonian systemssymplectic geometrytarget reachabilityinductive biasdata-driven controlchain policiesrecurrenceenergy level sets
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hamiltonian systems achieve target reachability with data requirements independent of state dimension by using symplectic geometry and recurrence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that physical structure in Hamiltonian dynamics provides an inductive bias for data-efficient nonlinear control of target reachability. By exploiting symplectic geometry together with intrinsic recurrence on energy level sets, locally certified trajectory segments can be extracted from demonstrations and composed into chain policies. Sufficient conditions are given under which this construction succeeds, and the data needed scales with explicit geometric and recurrence features of the Hamiltonian rather than the dimension of the state space. This replaces generic smoothness assumptions that produce exponential sample complexity with structure-specific guarantees grounded in the physics.

Core claim

Chain policies composed of locally certified trajectory segments extracted from demonstrations achieve target reachability in Hamiltonian systems whenever the energy level sets exhibit sufficient recurrence; the resulting data requirements are determined by explicit geometric and recurrence properties of the Hamiltonian rather than by the ambient state dimension.

What carries the argument

Chain policies that compose locally certified trajectory segments extracted from demonstrations, enabled by the symplectic structure and intrinsic recurrence on energy level sets.

If this is right

  • Sufficient conditions on recurrence and geometry guarantee that chain policies solve the reachability problem.
  • Data volume scales explicitly with the recurrence period and geometric features of the Hamiltonian.
  • The construction avoids exponential dependence on state dimension that arises from generic covering arguments.
  • Locally certified segments from demonstrations can be reused across multiple target problems within the same energy level.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar recurrence-based composition might apply to other conservative dynamical systems that preserve a foliation or integral of motion.
  • The approach suggests a template for incorporating other physical invariants into learning-based controllers to reduce sample needs.
  • Testing on mechanical systems with known periodic orbits would directly measure whether observed data scaling matches the predicted geometric dependence.

Load-bearing premise

The dynamical system must be Hamiltonian and exhibit intrinsic recurrence on energy level sets that permits extraction of locally certified trajectory segments from demonstrations.

What would settle it

A Hamiltonian system whose energy level sets lack sufficient recurrence, for which the chain-policy construction fails to reach the target even when given the same demonstration data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17213 by Enrique Mallada, Jixian Liu, Zhuo Ouyang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Assignment set construction. certified radius is ri(t) = ∆H(xi) − ∆H(ϕ(t, xi , ui,t)) − v0t LH + LHe Lt . If ri(t) > 0, then ui,t is valid on Bri(t)(xi). We choose ti ∈ arg maxt∈(0,Tj−s], ri(t)>0 ri(t), set τi := ti , ui := ui,ti , and ri := ri(ti), and add (xi , ri , ui) to K. Then let σi := inf{δ ∈ (0, τi ] | ϕ(s + δ, xj , uj ) ∈ ∂Bri (xi)}, with σi := τi if the set is empty. The next anchor is xi+1 := ϕ… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Single pendulum results. In this task, as Fig 3a shows, the success rate of the proposed chain policy increases from 0.348 at M = 1 to 0.678 at M = 2, and reaches 1.0 for all M ≥ 3. However, vanilla BC remains consistently inferior, with success rates 0.008, 0.53, 0.418, 0.65, and 0.744 for M = 1, . . . , 5, respectively. Besides, the average reach time shown in Fig. 3b also decreases significantly as the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spring-mass system results. As shown in Fig. 2a, the proposed chain policy achieves a success rate of 1.0 for all tested numbers of expert trajectories, indicating that the task can be solved reliably with very limited demonstration data. In contrast, vanilla BC performs poorly when only a small number of trajectories are available, with success rates of only 0.062 and 0.19 for M = 1 and M = 2, respectivel… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Inductive bias refers to restrictions on the hypothesis class that enable a learning method to generalize effectively from limited data. A canonical example in control is linearity, which underpins low sample-complexity guarantees for stabilization and optimal control. For general nonlinear dynamics, by contrast, guarantees often rely on smoothness assumptions (e.g., Lipschitz continuity) which, when combined with covering arguments, can lead to data requirements that grow exponentially with the ambient dimension. In this paper we argue that data-efficient nonlinear control demands exploiting inductive bias embedded in nature itself, namely, structure imposed by physical laws. Focusing on Hamiltonian systems, we leverage symplectic geometry and intrinsic recurrence on energy level sets to solve target reachability problems. Our approach combines the recurrence property with a recently proposed class of policies, called chain policies, which composes locally certified trajectory segments extracted from demonstrations to achieve target reachability. We provide sufficient conditions for reachability under this construction and show that the resulting data requirements depend on explicit geometric and recurrence properties of the Hamiltonian rather than the state dimension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper argues that symplectic geometry and intrinsic recurrence on energy level sets in Hamiltonian systems provide an inductive bias enabling data-efficient target reachability. It combines this with chain policies that compose locally certified trajectory segments extracted from demonstrations, provides sufficient conditions for reachability under the construction, and claims that the resulting data requirements are governed by explicit geometric and recurrence properties of the Hamiltonian rather than the ambient state dimension n.

Significance. If the sufficient conditions truly separate data requirements from n, the result would be a meaningful contribution to structured nonlinear control, showing how physical laws can replace generic smoothness assumptions that lead to exponential dimension dependence. The explicit focus on recurrence and chain policies is a concrete way to operationalize symplectic inductive bias.

major comments (1)
  1. [Main theorem on sufficient conditions] Main result (presumably the theorem stating sufficient conditions for reachability): the claimed dimension independence must be verified by showing that the recurrence time on energy level sets, the measure of those sets, and any covering numbers used for local certification remain bounded independently of n. Generic Hamiltonian flows on high-dimensional manifolds can have recurrence times or covering numbers that grow with n, which would undermine the central claim even if the system is Hamiltonian.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Construction of chain policies] Clarify the precise definition of 'locally certified trajectory segments' and how certification is performed from finite demonstrations without implicit density requirements that could reintroduce dimension dependence.
  2. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract mentions 'explicit geometric and recurrence properties'; ensure these are listed with their functional dependence (or independence) on n in the statement of the main theorem.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the insightful comment regarding the dimension independence in our sufficient conditions. We address this point directly below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Main theorem on sufficient conditions] Main result (presumably the theorem stating sufficient conditions for reachability): the claimed dimension independence must be verified by showing that the recurrence time on energy level sets, the measure of those sets, and any covering numbers used for local certification remain bounded independently of n. Generic Hamiltonian flows on high-dimensional manifolds can have recurrence times or covering numbers that grow with n, which would undermine the central claim even if the system is Hamiltonian.

    Authors: The main theorem provides sufficient conditions for reachability under chain policies, with explicit sample-complexity bounds expressed in terms of the recurrence time on energy level sets, the measure of those sets, and covering numbers for local certification of trajectory segments. These quantities are intrinsic geometric and dynamical properties of the specific Hamiltonian rather than generic bounds derived from ambient dimension n under unstructured Lipschitz assumptions. While we agree that generic high-dimensional Hamiltonian flows can exhibit recurrence times or covering numbers that grow with n, the symplectic inductive bias enables us to avoid the exponential-in-n covering of the full state space that arises in generic nonlinear control. For Hamiltonian systems with additional structure (e.g., integrability, conserved quantities, or bounded energy surfaces), these quantities often remain independent of n. We will add a clarifying remark and examples in the revised manuscript to make this distinction explicit and to state the additional conditions under which the bounds are dimension-independent. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on external geometric properties and stated sufficient conditions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on providing sufficient conditions for reachability that explicitly tie data requirements to geometric and recurrence properties of the Hamiltonian (symplectic structure and energy level set recurrence), rather than reducing any bound or prediction to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition. The reference to chain policies is to a prior construction whose use here is justified by new conditions derived in this work; no equations in the abstract or described chain equate outputs to inputs by construction. The approach is self-contained against standard symplectic geometry benchmarks and does not invoke load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes that collapse the result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the plant is exactly Hamiltonian and that demonstrations contain locally certifiable segments whose chaining preserves reachability; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The system dynamics are Hamiltonian and therefore symplectic with conserved energy.
    Invoked to justify recurrence on energy level sets and symplectic inductive bias.
  • domain assumption Demonstrations admit extraction of locally certified trajectory segments.
    Required for the chain-policy construction to be well-defined.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1176 out tokens · 35105 ms · 2026-05-10T06:35:20.280083+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    V . N. Vapnik,Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, 1998

    1998

  2. [2]

    Shalev-Shwartz and S

    S. Shalev-Shwartz and S. Ben-David,Understanding Ma- chine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, 2014

    2014

  3. [3]

    C. M. Bishop,Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, 2006

    2006

  4. [4]

    Non-asymptotic identification of linear dynamical systems from a single trajectory,

    S. Oymak and N. Ozay, “Non-asymptotic identification of linear dynamical systems from a single trajectory,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05722, 2018

    work page arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Non-asymptotic identification of linear dynamical systems using multiple trajectories,

    Y . Zheng and N. Li, “Non-asymptotic identification of linear dynamical systems using multiple trajectories,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1693–1698, 2021

    2021

  6. [6]

    On the sample complexity of stabilizing lti systems on a single trajectory,

    Y . Hu, A. Wierman, and G. Qu, “On the sample complexity of stabilizing lti systems on a single trajectory,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, 2022, pp. 16 989–17 002

    2022

  7. [7]

    On the sample com- plexity of stabilizing linear dynamical systems from data,

    S. W. Werner and B. Peherstorfer, “On the sample com- plexity of stabilizing linear dynamical systems from data,” Foundations of Computational Mathematics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 955–987, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Learning stabilizing policies via an unstable subspace representation,

    L. F. Toso, L. Ye, and J. Anderson, “Learning stabilizing policies via an unstable subspace representation,” inIEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, 2025, pp. 7543–7550

    2025

  9. [9]

    On the sample complexity of the linear quadratic regulator,

    S. Dean, H. Mania, N. Matni, B. Recht, and S. Tu, “On the sample complexity of the linear quadratic regulator,” Foundations of Computational Mathematics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 633–679, 2020

    2020

  10. [10]

    Formulas for data-driven control: Stabilization, optimality, and robustness,

    C. De Persis and P. Tesi, “Formulas for data-driven control: Stabilization, optimality, and robustness,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 909–924, 2020

    2020

  11. [11]

    Data-enabled pre- dictive control: In the shallows of the deepc,

    J. Coulson, J. Lygeros, and F. D ¨orfler, “Data-enabled pre- dictive control: In the shallows of the deepc,” inEuropean Control Conference (ECC), IEEE, 2019, pp. 307–312

    2019

  12. [12]

    Data-driven model predictive control with stability and robustness guarantees,

    J. Berberich, J. K ¨ohler, M. A. M ¨uller, and F. Allg ¨ower, “Data-driven model predictive control with stability and robustness guarantees,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1702–1717, 2021

    2021

  13. [13]

    A semi-algebraic optimization approach to data-driven control of continuous-time nonlinear systems,

    T. Dai and M. Sznaier, “A semi-algebraic optimization approach to data-driven control of continuous-time nonlinear systems,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 487–492, 2020

    2020

  14. [14]

    Data-driven stabilization of nonlinear polynomial systems with noisy data,

    M. Guo, C. De Persis, and P. Tesi, “Data-driven stabilization of nonlinear polynomial systems with noisy data,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 4210– 4217, 2021

    2021

  15. [15]

    Data-driven control of nonlinear systems: Beyond polynomial dynamics,

    R. Str ¨asser, J. Berberich, and F. Allg ¨ower, “Data-driven control of nonlinear systems: Beyond polynomial dynamics,” inIEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, 2021, pp. 4344–4351

    2021

  16. [16]

    A versatile framework for data-driven control of nonlinear systems,

    N. Monshizadeh, C. De Persis, and P. Tesi, “A versatile framework for data-driven control of nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2025, to appear

    2025

  17. [17]

    Learning stability certificates from data,

    N. M. Boffi, S. Tu, N. Matni, J.-J. Slotine, and V . Sindhwani, “Learning stability certificates from data,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.05952, 2020

    work page arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    Data-driven practical sta- bilization of nonlinear systems via chain policies: Sam- ple complexity and incremental learning,

    R. Siegelmann and E. Mallada, “Data-driven practical sta- bilization of nonlinear systems via chain policies: Sam- ple complexity and incremental learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.03982, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    A simple and efficient sampling-based algorithm for general reachability analysis,

    T. Lew, L. Janson, R. Bonalli, and M. Pavone, “A simple and efficient sampling-based algorithm for general reachability analysis,” inLearning for Dynamics and Control Conference, PMLR, 2022, pp. 1086–1099

    2022

  20. [20]

    A recurrence-based direct method for stability analysis and gpu-based verification of non-monotonic lyapunov func- tions,

    R. Siegelmann, Y . Shen, F. Paganini, and E. Mallada, “A recurrence-based direct method for stability analysis and gpu-based verification of non-monotonic lyapunov func- tions,” in2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, 2023, pp. 6665–6672

    2023

  21. [21]

    Recurrence of nonlinear control systems: Entropy, bit rates, and finite alphabet controllers,

    H. Sibai and E. Mallada, “Recurrence of nonlinear control systems: Entropy, bit rates, and finite alphabet controllers,” Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, vol. 59, p. 101 649, 2026

    2026

  22. [22]

    Recurrent control barrier functions: A path towards nonparametric safety verification,

    J. Liu and E. Mallada, “Recurrent control barrier functions: A path towards nonparametric safety verification,” in2025 IEEE 64th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, 2025, pp. 7721–7727

    2025

  23. [23]

    Safety-Critical Control via Recurrent Tracking Functions

    J. Liu and E. Mallada, “Safety-critical control via recurrent tracking functions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01147, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Viana and K

    M. Viana and K. Oliveira,Foundations of ergodic theory. Cambridge University Press, 2016

    2016

  25. [25]

    Anosov flows,

    J. F. Plante, “Anosov flows,”American Journal of Mathe- matics, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 729–754, 1972

    1972

  26. [26]

    Ergodic theory and the geodesic flow on surfaces of constant negative curvature,

    E. Hopf, “Ergodic theory and the geodesic flow on surfaces of constant negative curvature,” 1971

    1971

  27. [27]

    The ergodic theory of axiom a flows,

    R. Bowen and D. Ruelle, “The ergodic theory of axiom a flows,” inThe theory of chaotic attractors, Springer, 1975, pp. 55–76

    1975

  28. [28]

    A robust adaptive velocity observer for me- chanical systems transformed in cascade form,

    J. G. Romero, “A robust adaptive velocity observer for me- chanical systems transformed in cascade form,”Automatica, vol. 165, p. 111 671, 2024

    2024

  29. [29]

    Action chunking and data augmentation yield exponential improvements in behavior cloning for continu- ous spaces,

    T. T. Zhang, D. Pfrommer, C. Pan, N. Matni, and M. Simchowitz, “Action chunking and data augmentation yield exponential improvements in behavior cloning for continu- ous spaces,” inInternational Conference on Learning Rep- resentations (ICLR), 2026

    2026