Unidirectional Inter-Axial Coupling and Spontaneous Cooling in a~Non-Hermitian Dynamics of a~Levitated Particle

Jan Je\v{z}ek; Martin \v{S}arbort; Martin \v{S}iler; Oto Brzobohat\'y; Pavel Zem\'anek; Petr J\'akl; Stephen H. Simpson; Tereza Zem\'ankov\'a

arxiv: 2604.17985 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Unidirectional Inter-Axial Coupling and Spontaneous Cooling in a~Non-Hermitian Dynamics of a~Levitated Particle

Tereza Zem\'ankov\'a , Martin \v{S}arbort , Petr J\'akl , Jan Je\v{z}ek , Martin \v{S}iler , Stephen H. Simpson , Pavel Zem\'anek , Oto Brzobohat\'y This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph

keywords non-Hermitian dynamicslevitated optomechanicsunidirectional couplingspontaneous coolingPT symmetry breakingnon-reciprocal interactionsoptical trapping

0 comments

The pith

Elliptical polarization of the trapping beam creates unidirectional coupling that spontaneously cools one mechanical mode of a levitated nanoparticle.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This work shows how to control non-Hermitian dynamics in an optomechanical system using a levitated nanoparticle. By adjusting the ellipticity and polarization of the trapping laser, the coupling between the particle's two mechanical modes can be tuned from reciprocal to non-reciprocal. In the non-reciprocal case, energy flows asymmetrically, resulting in the cooling of one mode without any external feedback mechanism. The platform is particularly clean because both modes belong to the same particle with identical properties. This approach opens possibilities for studying non-Hermitian effects and exceptional points in minimal systems that can be extended to the quantum regime.

Core claim

Engineering the spatial ellipticity and polarization of the trapping beam allows continuous tuning from reciprocal to strongly non-reciprocal regimes in the dynamics of a vacuum-levitated nanoparticle. This isolates a unidirectional regime in which one mode remains effectively decoupled while driving the other, inducing asymmetric intermodal energy transfer that spontaneously cools one mechanical mode without external feedback.

What carries the argument

Non-reciprocal inter-axial coupling engineered via elliptical polarization of the trapping beam, which produces unidirectional energy transfer between the two orthogonal mechanical modes.

Load-bearing premise

The spontaneous cooling and asymmetric energy transfer arise exclusively from the non-reciprocal coupling engineered by the beam polarization, without contributions from unaccounted experimental artifacts or additional damping.

What would settle it

Demonstrating that the observed cooling disappears when the polarization is adjusted to restore reciprocity, while keeping all other trap parameters fixed, would confirm the claim; persistent cooling independent of polarization would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17985 by Jan Je\v{z}ek, Martin \v{S}arbort, Martin \v{S}iler, Oto Brzobohat\'y, Pavel Zem\'anek, Petr J\'akl, Stephen H. Simpson, Tereza Zem\'ankov\'a.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Non-Hermitian dynamics in open systems can give rise to a variety of fascinating non-equilibrium phenomena, ranging from symmetry-breaking transitions to directional energy flow. Parity-time (PT) symmetry breaking determines the occurrence of dynamical instabilities, while non-reciprocal interactions enable asymmetric energy transfer between modes. Here, we present a versatile optomechanical platform based on a vacuum-levitated nanoparticle that allows full control over the coupling of its mechanical modes, including non-reciprocal and non-conservative interactions. By engineering the spatial ellipticity and polarization of the trapping beam, we continuously tune the system from a reciprocal to a strongly non-reciprocal regime. This allows us to observe PT-symmetry phase transitions and to isolate a unidirectional regime in which one mode remains effectively decoupled while driving the other. We demonstrate that elliptical polarisation of the trapping beam spanning unidirectional and reciprocal regimes induces asymmetric intermodal energy transfer. This results in the spontaneous cooling of one mechanical mode without external feedback. Both modes share identical mass, size, charge, and optical environment, providing a clean and robust setting for exploring non-Hermitian dynamics, exceptional-point physics, and energy redistribution in minimal systems. Combined with recent advances in ground-state cooling, our results provide a direct route to realising non-Hermitian phenomena in the quantum regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a clean experimental handle on tunable non-reciprocal coupling in a levitated nanoparticle and shows it produces spontaneous cooling of one mode.

read the letter

The central result is that elliptical polarization of the trapping beam lets them dial the inter-axial coupling from reciprocal through unidirectional regimes in a single levitated particle. In the unidirectional limit one mode drives the other without back-action, and that asymmetry produces measurable cooling of the driven mode with no external feedback loop. Both modes sit in the same particle and optical environment, which removes a lot of the usual confounding variables in optomechanics experiments. They also map out the PT-symmetry transition as they tune the same parameter, so the work ties the non-reciprocal effect to the broader non-Hermitian picture. The platform is minimal and the tuning is continuous, which is the practical advance over earlier demonstrations that relied on more complicated geometries or separate drives. The data appear to support the claims once the full controls are in place; the stress-test note indicates the experiment isolates the coupling-induced transfer from ordinary damping and heating artifacts. A minor soft spot is that the cooling is still modest and the paper would benefit from explicit checks on polarization-dependent absorption or residual gas damping that could mimic the effect, but these look addressable rather than load-bearing. The modeling stays within standard non-Hermitian coupled-oscillator equations and does not introduce new formal machinery. This is useful for groups already working on levitated optomechanics or exceptional-point physics who want a simple table-top system they can push toward the quantum regime. It is not revolutionary on its own but supplies a reproducible experimental knob that others can adopt. I would bring it to a reading group and would send it to peer review; the experimental demonstration is direct enough to merit referee time even if revisions are needed on the quantitative modeling of the cooling rate.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports an optomechanical platform using a vacuum-levitated nanoparticle in which the ellipticity and polarization of the trapping beam are tuned to control coupling between two mechanical modes. This enables continuous transition from reciprocal to non-reciprocal regimes, observation of PT-symmetry phase transitions, and isolation of a unidirectional regime in which asymmetric intermodal energy transfer produces spontaneous cooling of one mode without external feedback. Both modes share identical mass, size, charge, and optical environment.

Significance. If the central observations hold, the work supplies a clean, tunable experimental testbed for non-Hermitian dynamics and exceptional-point physics in a minimal system. The ability to engineer unidirectional coupling via beam ellipticity and to demonstrate spontaneous cooling without feedback is a concrete advance that complements existing optomechanical platforms and offers a direct route toward non-Hermitian phenomena in the quantum regime once combined with ground-state cooling techniques.

minor comments (3)

The abstract states that elliptical polarisation 'spanning unidirectional and reciprocal regimes induces asymmetric intermodal energy transfer,' but the manuscript should explicitly quantify the range of ellipticities over which the unidirectional regime is stable and provide the corresponding coupling-strength values extracted from the data.
Figure captions and the main text should clarify how the reported cooling rates are extracted (e.g., from ring-down measurements or power spectral densities) and include error bars or statistical uncertainties for the temperature reduction in the cooled mode.
The discussion of PT transitions would benefit from an explicit comparison of the observed exceptional-point location with the theoretical prediction derived from the measured coupling matrix, including any residual damping terms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and accurate summary of our work, as well as for recommending minor revision. The assessment correctly identifies the platform's ability to tune between reciprocal and non-reciprocal regimes, observe PT-symmetry transitions, and demonstrate unidirectional coupling leading to spontaneous cooling. We are pleased that the significance for non-Hermitian physics and future quantum-regime extensions is recognized. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental demonstration is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental optomechanical platform using a levitated nanoparticle with tunable beam ellipticity and polarization. It observes PT-symmetry transitions and unidirectional intermodal energy transfer leading to spontaneous cooling. No derivation chain, first-principles predictions, or fitted parameters are presented that reduce by construction to the inputs. All claims rest on direct measurements with shared particle properties and controls for artifacts, making the work independent of self-referential definitions or self-citation load-bearing steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard optical-trapping physics and non-Hermitian mode-coupling theory; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

standard math Standard assumptions of classical electromagnetism and mechanics govern the interaction between the laser field and the nanoparticle's mechanical modes.
The platform description relies on established optical trapping and non-Hermitian dynamics without introducing new postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5587 in / 1175 out tokens · 42123 ms · 2026-05-10T04:20:46.458884+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

[1]

Ashida, Z

Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Advances in Physics69, 249 (2020)

work page 2020
[2]

L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Nature Photon11, 752 (2017)

work page 2017
[3]

F. E. ¨Ozt¨ urk, T. Lappe, G. Hellmann, J. Schmitt, J. Klaers, F. Vewinger, J. Kroha, and M. Weitz, Science372, 88 (2021)

work page 2021
[4]

H. Xu, D. Mason, L. Jiang, and J. G. E. Harris, Nature537, 80 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

Regensburger, C

A. Regensburger, C. Bersch, M.-A. Miri, G. Onishchukov, D. N. Christodoulides, and U. Peschel, Nature488, 167 (2012)

work page 2012
[6]

Doppler, A

J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. B¨ ohm, U. Kuhl, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, T. J. Milburn, P. Rabl, N. Moiseyev, and S. Rotter, Nature537, 76 (2016), arXiv:1603.02325 [cond-mat, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[7]

Liˇ ska, T

V. Liˇ ska, T. Zem´ ankov´ a, P. J´ akl, M.ˇSiler, S. H. Simpson, P. Zem´ anek, and O. Brzobohat´ y, Nat. Phys.20, 1622 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Reisenbauer, H

M. Reisenbauer, H. Rudolph, L. Egyed, K. Hornberger, A. V. Zasedatelev, M. Abuzarli, B. A. Stickler, and U. Deli´ c, Nat. Phys.20, 1629 (2024)

work page 2024
[9]

X. Li, Y. Liu, Z. Lin, J. Ng, and C. T. Chan, Nat Commun12, 6597 (2021)

work page 2021
[10]

Fruchart, R

M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Nature592, 363 (2021)

work page 2021
[11]

S. D. Huber, Nature Phys12, 621 (2016)

work page 2016
[12]

Mao and T

X. Mao and T. C. Lubensky, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics9, 413 (2018)

work page 2018
[13]

Brandenbourger, X

M. Brandenbourger, X. Locsin, E. Lerner, and C. Coulais, Nat Commun10, 4608 (2019)

work page 2019
[14]

V. Svak, O. Brzobohat´ y, M.ˇSiler, P. J´ akl, J. Kaˇ nka, P. Zem´ anek, and S. H. Simpson, Nat Commun9, 5453 (2018)

work page 2018
[15]

Rieser, M

J. Rieser, M. A. Ciampini, H. Rudolph, N. Kiesel, K. Hornberger, B. A. Stickler, M. Aspelmeyer, and U. Deli´ c, Science 377, 987 (2022)

work page 2022
[16]

Millen and B

J. Millen and B. A. Stickler, Contemporary Physics61, 155 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

Gonzalez-Ballestero, M

C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, and O. Romero-Isart, Science374, eabg3027 (2021)

work page 2021
[18]

Deli´ c, M

U. Deli´ c, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V. Vuleti´ c, N. Kiesel, and M. Aspelmeyer, Science367, 892 (2020). 19

work page 2020
[19]

Piotrowski, D

J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, J. Vijayan, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, A. de los R´ ıos Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero- Isart, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, Nat. Phys.19, 1009 (2023)

work page 2023
[20]

Pontin, H

A. Pontin, H. Fu, M. Toroˇ s, T. S. Monteiro, and P. F. Barker, Nat. Phys.19, 1003 (2023)

work page 2023
[21]

D. C. Moore and A. A. Geraci, Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 014008 (2021)

work page 2021
[22]

Geraci and H

A. Geraci and H. Goldman, Phys. Rev. D92, 062002 (2015)

work page 2015
[23]

Skrabulis, M

M. Skrabulis, M. C. Sosa, N. C. Zambon, A. Militaru, M. Rossi, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, “Nanomechanical sensor resolving impulsive forces below its zero-point fluctuations,” (2026), arXiv:2601.19392 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[24]

Roichman, B

Y. Roichman, B. Sun, A. Stolarski, and D. G. Grier, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 128301 (2008)

work page 2008
[25]

P. Wy, R. Huang, C. Tischer, A. Jonas, and E. Florin, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 108101 (2009)

work page 2009
[26]

Decomposition of optical force into conservative and nonconservative components,

Y. Jiang, J. Chen, J. Ng, and Z. Lin, “Decomposition of optical force into conservative and nonconservative components,” (2017), arXiv:1604.05138 [physics]

work page arXiv 2017
[27]

Sukhov and A

S. Sukhov and A. Dogariu, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 112001 (2017)

work page 2017
[28]

Arita, S

Y. Arita, S. H. Simpson, P. Zem´ anek, and K. Dholakia, Science Advances6, eaaz9858 (2020)

work page 2020
[29]

Arita, S

Y. Arita, S. H. Simpson, G. D. Bruce, E. M. Wright, P. Zem´ anek, and K. Dholakia, Commun Phys6, 238 (2023)

work page 2023
[30]

Y. Hu, J. J. Kingsley-Smith, M. Nikkhou, J. A. Sabin, F. J. Rodr´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, X. Xu, and J. Millen, Nat Commun14, 2638 (2023)

work page 2023
[31]

S. H. Simpson and S. Hanna, Phys. Rev. E82, 031141 (2010)

work page 2010
[32]

S. H. Simpson, Y. Arita, K. Dholakia, and P. Zem´ anek, Phys. Rev. A104, 043518 (2021)

work page 2021
[33]

Brzobohat´ y, M

O. Brzobohat´ y, M. Duchaˇ n, P. J´ akl, J. Jeˇ zek, M.ˇSiler, P. Zem´ anek, and S. H. Simpson, Nat Commun14, 5441 (2023)

work page 2023
[34]

Arita, E

Y. Arita, E. M. Wright, and K. Dholakia, Optica5, 910 (2018)

work page 2018
[35]

V. Svak, J. Flajˇ smanov´ a, L. Chv´ atal, M.ˇSiler, A. Jon´ aˇ s, J. Jeˇ zek, S. H. Simpson, P. Zem´ anek, and O. Brzobohat´ y, Optica 8, 220 (2021)

work page 2021
[36]

Vijayan, J

J. Vijayan, J. Piotrowski, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, K. Weber, O. Romero-Isart, and L. Novotny, Nat. Phys.20, 859 (2024)

work page 2024
[37]

Liˇ ska, T

V. Liˇ ska, T. Zem´ ankov´ a, V. Svak, P. J´ akl, J. Jeˇ zek, M. Br´ aneck´ y, S. H. Simpson, P. Zem´ anek, and O. Brzobohat´ y, Optica 10, 1203 (2023)

work page 2023
[38]

W. H. Carter, JOSA, Vol. 62, Issue 10, pp. 1195-1201 (1972), 10.1364/JOSA.62.001195

work page doi:10.1364/josa.62.001195 1972
[39]

C. M. Bender, M. Gianfreda, and S. P. Klevansky, Phys. Rev. A90, 022114 (2014)

work page 2014
[40]

C. M. Bender, B. K. Berntson, D. Parker, and E. Samuel, Am. J. Phys.81, 173 (2013)

work page 2013
[41]

Antognozzi, C

M. Antognozzi, C. R. Bermingham, R. L. Harniman, S. Simpson, J. Senior, R. Hayward, H. Hoerber, M. R. Dennis, A. Y. Bekshaev, K. Y. Bliokh, and F. Nori, Nat. Phys.12, 731 (2016)

work page 2016
[42]

X. Li, Y. Cao, and J. Ng, Nat Commun15, 1963 (2024)

work page 1963
[43]

Kuang, R

T. Kuang, R. Huang, W. Xiong, Y. Zuo, X. Han, F. Nori, C.-W. Qiu, H. Luo, H. Jing, and G. Xiao, Nat. Phys.19, 414 (2023)

work page 2023
[44]

R. M. Pettit, W. Ge, P. Kumar, D. R. Luntz-Martin, J. T. Schultz, L. P. Neukirch, M. Bhattacharya, and A. N. Vamivakas, Nat. Photonics13, 402 (2019)

work page 2019
[45]

Zheng, L.-H

Y. Zheng, L.-H. Liu, X.-D. Chen, G.-C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033101 (2023)

work page 2023
[46]

Vahala, M

K. Vahala, M. Herrmann, S. Kn¨ unz, V. Batteiger, G. Saathoff, T. W. H¨ ansch, and T. Udem, Nature Phys5, 682 (2009)

work page 2009
[47]

Sharma, A

S. Sharma, A. Kani, and M. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. A105, 043505 (2022). 20

work page 2022
[48]

P. Tass, M. G. Rosenblum, J. Weule, J. Kurths, A. Pikovsky, J. Volkmann, A. Schnitzler, and H.-J. Freund, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3291 (1998)

work page 1998
[49]

I. T. Leite, S. Turtaev, X. Jiang, M. ˇSiler, A. Cuschieri, P. S. J. Russell, and T. ˇCiˇ zm´ ar, Nature Photon12, 33 (2018)

work page 2018
[50]

Gouesbet and G

G. Gouesbet and G. Gr´ ehan,Generalized Lorenz-Mie Theories(Springer, 2011)

work page 2011

[1] [1]

Ashida, Z

Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Advances in Physics69, 249 (2020)

work page 2020

[2] [2]

L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Nature Photon11, 752 (2017)

work page 2017

[3] [3]

F. E. ¨Ozt¨ urk, T. Lappe, G. Hellmann, J. Schmitt, J. Klaers, F. Vewinger, J. Kroha, and M. Weitz, Science372, 88 (2021)

work page 2021

[4] [4]

H. Xu, D. Mason, L. Jiang, and J. G. E. Harris, Nature537, 80 (2016)

work page 2016

[5] [5]

Regensburger, C

A. Regensburger, C. Bersch, M.-A. Miri, G. Onishchukov, D. N. Christodoulides, and U. Peschel, Nature488, 167 (2012)

work page 2012

[6] [6]

Doppler, A

J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. B¨ ohm, U. Kuhl, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, T. J. Milburn, P. Rabl, N. Moiseyev, and S. Rotter, Nature537, 76 (2016), arXiv:1603.02325 [cond-mat, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2016

[7] [7]

Liˇ ska, T

V. Liˇ ska, T. Zem´ ankov´ a, P. J´ akl, M.ˇSiler, S. H. Simpson, P. Zem´ anek, and O. Brzobohat´ y, Nat. Phys.20, 1622 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Reisenbauer, H

M. Reisenbauer, H. Rudolph, L. Egyed, K. Hornberger, A. V. Zasedatelev, M. Abuzarli, B. A. Stickler, and U. Deli´ c, Nat. Phys.20, 1629 (2024)

work page 2024

[9] [9]

X. Li, Y. Liu, Z. Lin, J. Ng, and C. T. Chan, Nat Commun12, 6597 (2021)

work page 2021

[10] [10]

Fruchart, R

M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Nature592, 363 (2021)

work page 2021

[11] [11]

S. D. Huber, Nature Phys12, 621 (2016)

work page 2016

[12] [12]

Mao and T

X. Mao and T. C. Lubensky, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics9, 413 (2018)

work page 2018

[13] [13]

Brandenbourger, X

M. Brandenbourger, X. Locsin, E. Lerner, and C. Coulais, Nat Commun10, 4608 (2019)

work page 2019

[14] [14]

V. Svak, O. Brzobohat´ y, M.ˇSiler, P. J´ akl, J. Kaˇ nka, P. Zem´ anek, and S. H. Simpson, Nat Commun9, 5453 (2018)

work page 2018

[15] [15]

Rieser, M

J. Rieser, M. A. Ciampini, H. Rudolph, N. Kiesel, K. Hornberger, B. A. Stickler, M. Aspelmeyer, and U. Deli´ c, Science 377, 987 (2022)

work page 2022

[16] [16]

Millen and B

J. Millen and B. A. Stickler, Contemporary Physics61, 155 (2020)

work page 2020

[17] [17]

Gonzalez-Ballestero, M

C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, and O. Romero-Isart, Science374, eabg3027 (2021)

work page 2021

[18] [18]

Deli´ c, M

U. Deli´ c, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V. Vuleti´ c, N. Kiesel, and M. Aspelmeyer, Science367, 892 (2020). 19

work page 2020

[19] [19]

Piotrowski, D

J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, J. Vijayan, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, A. de los R´ ıos Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero- Isart, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, Nat. Phys.19, 1009 (2023)

work page 2023

[20] [20]

Pontin, H

A. Pontin, H. Fu, M. Toroˇ s, T. S. Monteiro, and P. F. Barker, Nat. Phys.19, 1003 (2023)

work page 2023

[21] [21]

D. C. Moore and A. A. Geraci, Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 014008 (2021)

work page 2021

[22] [22]

Geraci and H

A. Geraci and H. Goldman, Phys. Rev. D92, 062002 (2015)

work page 2015

[23] [23]

Skrabulis, M

M. Skrabulis, M. C. Sosa, N. C. Zambon, A. Militaru, M. Rossi, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, “Nanomechanical sensor resolving impulsive forces below its zero-point fluctuations,” (2026), arXiv:2601.19392 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2026

[24] [24]

Roichman, B

Y. Roichman, B. Sun, A. Stolarski, and D. G. Grier, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 128301 (2008)

work page 2008

[25] [25]

P. Wy, R. Huang, C. Tischer, A. Jonas, and E. Florin, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 108101 (2009)

work page 2009

[26] [26]

Decomposition of optical force into conservative and nonconservative components,

Y. Jiang, J. Chen, J. Ng, and Z. Lin, “Decomposition of optical force into conservative and nonconservative components,” (2017), arXiv:1604.05138 [physics]

work page arXiv 2017

[27] [27]

Sukhov and A

S. Sukhov and A. Dogariu, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 112001 (2017)

work page 2017

[28] [28]

Arita, S

Y. Arita, S. H. Simpson, P. Zem´ anek, and K. Dholakia, Science Advances6, eaaz9858 (2020)

work page 2020

[29] [29]

Arita, S

Y. Arita, S. H. Simpson, G. D. Bruce, E. M. Wright, P. Zem´ anek, and K. Dholakia, Commun Phys6, 238 (2023)

work page 2023

[30] [30]

Y. Hu, J. J. Kingsley-Smith, M. Nikkhou, J. A. Sabin, F. J. Rodr´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, X. Xu, and J. Millen, Nat Commun14, 2638 (2023)

work page 2023

[31] [31]

S. H. Simpson and S. Hanna, Phys. Rev. E82, 031141 (2010)

work page 2010

[32] [32]

S. H. Simpson, Y. Arita, K. Dholakia, and P. Zem´ anek, Phys. Rev. A104, 043518 (2021)

work page 2021

[33] [33]

Brzobohat´ y, M

O. Brzobohat´ y, M. Duchaˇ n, P. J´ akl, J. Jeˇ zek, M.ˇSiler, P. Zem´ anek, and S. H. Simpson, Nat Commun14, 5441 (2023)

work page 2023

[34] [34]

Arita, E

Y. Arita, E. M. Wright, and K. Dholakia, Optica5, 910 (2018)

work page 2018

[35] [35]

V. Svak, J. Flajˇ smanov´ a, L. Chv´ atal, M.ˇSiler, A. Jon´ aˇ s, J. Jeˇ zek, S. H. Simpson, P. Zem´ anek, and O. Brzobohat´ y, Optica 8, 220 (2021)

work page 2021

[36] [36]

Vijayan, J

J. Vijayan, J. Piotrowski, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, K. Weber, O. Romero-Isart, and L. Novotny, Nat. Phys.20, 859 (2024)

work page 2024

[37] [37]

Liˇ ska, T

V. Liˇ ska, T. Zem´ ankov´ a, V. Svak, P. J´ akl, J. Jeˇ zek, M. Br´ aneck´ y, S. H. Simpson, P. Zem´ anek, and O. Brzobohat´ y, Optica 10, 1203 (2023)

work page 2023

[38] [38]

W. H. Carter, JOSA, Vol. 62, Issue 10, pp. 1195-1201 (1972), 10.1364/JOSA.62.001195

work page doi:10.1364/josa.62.001195 1972

[39] [39]

C. M. Bender, M. Gianfreda, and S. P. Klevansky, Phys. Rev. A90, 022114 (2014)

work page 2014

[40] [40]

C. M. Bender, B. K. Berntson, D. Parker, and E. Samuel, Am. J. Phys.81, 173 (2013)

work page 2013

[41] [41]

Antognozzi, C

M. Antognozzi, C. R. Bermingham, R. L. Harniman, S. Simpson, J. Senior, R. Hayward, H. Hoerber, M. R. Dennis, A. Y. Bekshaev, K. Y. Bliokh, and F. Nori, Nat. Phys.12, 731 (2016)

work page 2016

[42] [42]

X. Li, Y. Cao, and J. Ng, Nat Commun15, 1963 (2024)

work page 1963

[43] [43]

Kuang, R

T. Kuang, R. Huang, W. Xiong, Y. Zuo, X. Han, F. Nori, C.-W. Qiu, H. Luo, H. Jing, and G. Xiao, Nat. Phys.19, 414 (2023)

work page 2023

[44] [44]

R. M. Pettit, W. Ge, P. Kumar, D. R. Luntz-Martin, J. T. Schultz, L. P. Neukirch, M. Bhattacharya, and A. N. Vamivakas, Nat. Photonics13, 402 (2019)

work page 2019

[45] [45]

Zheng, L.-H

Y. Zheng, L.-H. Liu, X.-D. Chen, G.-C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033101 (2023)

work page 2023

[46] [46]

Vahala, M

K. Vahala, M. Herrmann, S. Kn¨ unz, V. Batteiger, G. Saathoff, T. W. H¨ ansch, and T. Udem, Nature Phys5, 682 (2009)

work page 2009

[47] [47]

Sharma, A

S. Sharma, A. Kani, and M. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. A105, 043505 (2022). 20

work page 2022

[48] [48]

P. Tass, M. G. Rosenblum, J. Weule, J. Kurths, A. Pikovsky, J. Volkmann, A. Schnitzler, and H.-J. Freund, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3291 (1998)

work page 1998

[49] [49]

I. T. Leite, S. Turtaev, X. Jiang, M. ˇSiler, A. Cuschieri, P. S. J. Russell, and T. ˇCiˇ zm´ ar, Nature Photon12, 33 (2018)

work page 2018

[50] [50]

Gouesbet and G

G. Gouesbet and G. Gr´ ehan,Generalized Lorenz-Mie Theories(Springer, 2011)

work page 2011