pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17986 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 💻 cs.SD · cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

Latent Fourier Transform

Mason Wang , Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SD cs.AI
keywords latent Fourier transformgenerative musicdiffusion autoencoderfrequency domain controlmusic structure manipulationtimescale separation
0
0 comments X

The pith

By applying a Fourier transform to latents in a diffusion autoencoder and masking during training, musical structures can be edited and blended according to their timescales at inference time.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a way to control generative music models by operating on the frequency content of their internal latent representations rather than on the audio itself. It trains the model with frequency-domain masks so that at generation time, one can selectively preserve or alter patterns that occur at particular rates, like slow harmonic changes versus fast rhythms. This is meant to give musicians an intuitive knob for structure that parallels how an audio equalizer shapes timbre but for timing instead. If successful, it would make AI music tools more editable and interpretable without needing explicit symbolic controls.

Core claim

LatentFT separates musical patterns by timescale using a latent-space Fourier transform on a diffusion autoencoder. Masking latents in the frequency domain during training produces representations that support coherent manipulations at inference, enabling variations and blends that preserve characteristics at user-specified latent frequencies. This provides a continuous frequency axis for conditioning that improves adherence and quality over baselines.

What carries the argument

The latent Fourier transform, which converts the latent representation of a diffusion autoencoder into frequency components corresponding to different musical timescales and allows masking those components.

Load-bearing premise

That masking in the latent frequency domain cleanly separates musical timescales without introducing artifacts or breaking the diffusion generative process.

What would settle it

A listening test where participants rate whether edited outputs actually preserve the intended rhythmic or structural elements from the reference at the chosen timescales, compared to unmasked baselines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17986 by Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang, Mason Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: x ∈ R 16 decomposed via Eq 1. Discrete Fourier Transform. The discrete Fourier transform2 (DFT) cor￾relates an input signal x ∈ C N with N complex sinusoidal signals, giving its spectral representation X ∈ C N . The kth DFT coefficient is given by: X[k] = x · wk, (DFT) where (·) denotes the complex dot product, and wk[n] = e j(2πk/N)n de￾notes the kth complex sinusoid. The complex sinusoids w1, ..., wN for… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Latent Fourier Transform (LATENTFT). We encode audio (which may be represented as a waveform or spectrogram) into a series of latent vectors and compute a latent spectrum. During training (red), this spectrum is masked randomly and used to reconstruct the input. During inference (blue), the user specifies a spectral mask, which selects features from the input at specific latent frequencies and conditions a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Listening study with pairwise comparisons. We achieve the most head-to￾head wins on both criteria. 1 2 3 4 5 Time (s) 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 Hz Reference 1 2 3 4 5 Time (s) 0 - 1 Latent Hz 1 2 3 4 5 Time (s) 7.5 - 8.5 Latent Hz Bass Bass Reduced 8 Hz Accentuated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Preservation curves in￾dicating where tempo, pitch, genre reside in in the latent spectra of two reference songs. Musical concepts like genre, tempo, pitch, and chord changes are distributed across different regions of a song’s latent spec￾trum, analogous to how different sonic characteristics occupy distinct ranges of the audible spectrum. Given a song, we generate many variants while performing a sweep t… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A question from our listening study survey. A participant will compare each ordered pair of systems in the study once. The order of all questions is randomized. In addition, we include one attention check question for each survey participant. In the attention check, all recordings are silent, and the participant is instructed to select ‘2’ and ‘4’ for their two Likert scale ratings. The total duration of a… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Example masks where there is no correlation between the scores associated with each frequency bin. The masks are speckled and erratic. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Latent Frequency Bin 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Example Our Masking [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A conditional generation example, where we take 0.68–2.70 Hz from the latent spectrum of the reference (top left). LATENTFT generates a variation capturing the rhythmic pattern near 2 Hz. The frequency-masking, correlation, and log-scaling ablations also have a pattern near 2 Hz, but the audio quality is much worse. The encoder ablation does not follow the conditioning. 1 2 3 4 5 Time (s) 512 1024 2048 409… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A blending example, where we take 0–0.68 Hz from the first reference, and 10.78–43 Hz from the second reference. LATENTFT generates a variation that contains characteristics from both examples. For instance, the rapid rhythmic patterns of Reference 2 are retained, as well as the horizontal line from Reference 1. The correlation and log-scaling ablations retain some of these characteristics, while the enco… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: More Sweep Examples. Songs are taken from the GTZAN dataset. Generally, genre tends to be a global characteristic, lying around 0 Hz. Chord changes also lie in the low end of the latent spectrum, while tempo and pitch are associated with higher latent frequencies. Please refer to Sec. 4.6 for our motivations behind this experiment, and Appendix A.9 for implementation details. 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Mel-spectrograms where we remove the DFT during both training and inference. During inference, we condition the diffusion process on the full latent sequence z derived from a reference (left). This reconstructs the input without creating a variation (right). 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Conditioning on various RVQ layers in the Vampnet Model (left) and on various latent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce the Latent Fourier Transform (LatentFT), a framework that provides novel frequency-domain controls for generative music models. LatentFT combines a diffusion autoencoder with a latent-space Fourier transform to separate musical patterns by timescale. By masking latents in the frequency domain during training, our method yields representations that can be manipulated coherently at inference. This allows us to generate musical variations and blends from reference examples while preserving characteristics at desired timescales, which are specified as frequencies in the latent space. LatentFT parallels the role of the equalizer in music production: while traditional equalizers operates on audible frequencies to shape timbre, LatentFT operates on latent-space frequencies to shape musical structure. Experiments and listening tests show that LatentFT improves condition adherence and quality compared to baselines. We also present a technique for hearing frequencies in the latent space in isolation, and show different musical attributes reside in different regions of the latent spectrum. Our results show how frequency-domain control in latent space provides an intuitive, continuous frequency axis for conditioning and blending, advancing us toward more interpretable and interactive generative music models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Latent Fourier Transform (LatentFT), a framework combining a diffusion autoencoder with a latent-space Fourier transform to separate musical patterns by timescale. By masking latents in the frequency domain during training, the method produces representations that support coherent manipulations at inference time, enabling generation of musical variations and blends from reference examples while preserving characteristics at user-specified timescales (treated as frequencies in latent space). The approach is analogized to an audio equalizer but operating on latent frequencies to shape musical structure. The authors claim that experiments and listening tests demonstrate improved condition adherence and quality relative to baselines, and they present a technique for isolating and auditioning individual latent frequencies to show that distinct musical attributes occupy different regions of the latent spectrum.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated by rigorous experiments, LatentFT could offer a valuable contribution to generative music modeling by supplying an intuitive, continuous frequency axis for conditioning and editing. The timescale-separation idea and the equalizer analogy provide a clear conceptual bridge to music production practice, and the ability to manipulate latents without retraining is potentially useful for interactive applications. The work builds directly on diffusion autoencoders and introduces a new manipulation primitive; however, the absence of any equations, implementation specifics, quantitative results, or ablation studies in the supplied manuscript prevents a full evaluation of its technical novelty or practical impact.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The load-bearing claim that frequency-domain masking during training produces latents that can be 'manipulated coherently at inference' while preserving timescale-specific characteristics rests on the unstated assumption that musical patterns are meaningfully separable in the latent frequency domain. No definition of the Latent Fourier Transform, no equation for the masking operation, and no derivation showing why the inverse transform remains stable after masking are provided, making it impossible to assess whether the generative process remains intact or whether artifacts are introduced.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that 'different musical attributes reside in different regions of the latent spectrum' but supplies neither examples of such attributes nor any visualization or quantitative measure of the separation, which would be needed to substantiate the interpretability claim.
  2. No information is given on the base diffusion autoencoder architecture, training dataset, or exact masking schedule (e.g., which frequency bands are masked and at what probability), all of which are required for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and for identifying areas where additional technical detail would strengthen the manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The load-bearing claim that frequency-domain masking during training produces latents that can be 'manipulated coherently at inference' while preserving timescale-specific characteristics rests on the unstated assumption that musical patterns are meaningfully separable in the latent frequency domain. No definition of the Latent Fourier Transform, no equation for the masking operation, and no derivation showing why the inverse transform remains stable after masking are provided, making it impossible to assess whether the generative process remains intact or whether artifacts are introduced.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is high-level and omits the formal definition, equation, and stability argument, which limits evaluability. The manuscript body describes the LatentFT procedure, but we will revise to insert the explicit definition (discrete Fourier transform applied to the diffusion autoencoder latents), the masking equation (element-wise multiplication by a binary frequency mask during training), and a short derivation showing that the inverse DFT remains stable because the autoencoder is trained end-to-end with a reconstruction objective that tolerates band-limited perturbations. This also makes the separability assumption explicit: the training objective forces distinct timescale patterns into separate latent-frequency bands. We will further add the quantitative results, implementation specifics, and ablation studies noted in the referee's significance assessment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper introduces a methodological framework (diffusion autoencoder + latent-space Fourier transform + frequency masking during training) rather than deriving a mathematical result from first principles. No equations, parameter fits, or predictions are presented that reduce to the inputs by construction. The central claim—that masking produces timescale-manipulable latents—is validated externally via experiments and listening tests, not by internal self-definition or self-citation chains. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the introduction of the LatentFT framework itself; standard machine-learning assumptions are implicit but not detailed.

invented entities (1)
  • Latent Fourier Transform (LatentFT) no independent evidence
    purpose: Framework combining diffusion autoencoder with latent-space Fourier transform for timescale-specific music control
    Newly proposed method whose details and validation are described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5473 in / 1138 out tokens · 40258 ms · 2026-05-10T03:42:27.238353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    MusicLM: Generating Music From Text

    Andrea Agostinelli, Timo I Denk, Zal ´an Borsos, Jesse Engel, Mauro Verzetti, Antoine Caillon, Qingqing Huang, Aren Jansen, Adam Roberts, Marco Tagliasacchi, et al. Musiclm: Generating music from text.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11325,

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  2. [2]

    Edify image: High-quality image generation with pixel space laplacian diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07126, 2024

    Yuval Atzmon, Maciej Bala, Yogesh Balaji, Tiffany Cai, Yin Cui, Jiaojiao Fan, Yunhao Ge, Sid- dharth Gururani, Jacob Huffman, Ronald Isaac, et al. Edify image: High-quality image generation with pixel space laplacian diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07126,

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    Unsupervised composable representations for audio.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09792,

    Giovanni Bindi and Philippe Esling. Unsupervised composable representations for audio.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09792,

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Maximum filter vibrato suppression for onset detection

    Sebastian B ¨ock and Gerhard Widmer. Maximum filter vibrato suppression for onset detection. In Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx). Maynooth, Ireland (Sept 2013), volume 7, pp

    2013

  5. [5]

    Soundstorm: Efficient parallel audio generation,

    Zal´an Borsos, Rapha¨el Marinier, Damien Vincent, Eugene Kharitonov, Olivier Pietquin, Matt Shar- ifi, Dominik Roblek, Olivier Teboul, David Grangier, Marco Tagliasacchi, et al. Audiolm: a language modeling approach to audio generation.IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing, 31:2523–2533, 2023a. Zal´an Borsos, Matt Sharifi, Damien...

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Rave: A variational autoencoder for fast and high-quality neural audio synthesis,

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05011. Ke Chen, Yusong Wu, Haohe Liu, Marianna Nezhurina, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, and Shlomo Dub- nov. Musicldm: Enhancing novelty in text-to-music generation using beat-synchronous mixup strategies. InICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Sig- nal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1206–1210. IEEE,

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Ilvr: Conditioning method for denoising diffusion probabilistic models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02938, 2021

    Jooyoung Choi, Sungwon Kim, Yonghyun Jeong, Youngjune Gwon, and Sungroh Yoon. Ilvr: Con- ditioning method for denoising diffusion probabilistic models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02938,

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Music style transfer: A position paper.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.06841,

    Shuqi Dai, Zheng Zhang, and Gus G Xia. Music style transfer: A position paper.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.06841,

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Stable audio open

    Zach Evans, Julian D Parker, CJ Carr, Zack Zukowski, Josiah Taylor, and Jordi Pons. Stable audio open. InICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1–5. IEEE,

    2025

  10. [10]

    Hugo Flores Garcia, Prem Seetharaman, Rithesh Kumar, and Bryan Pardo

    URLhttps://riffusion.com/about. Hugo Flores Garcia, Prem Seetharaman, Rithesh Kumar, and Bryan Pardo. Vampnet: Music gener- ation via masked acoustic token modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04686,

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Sketch2sound: Controllable audio generation via time-varying signals and sonic imitations

    Hugo Flores Garc ´ıa, Oriol Nieto, Justin Salamon, Bryan Pardo, and Prem Seetharaman. Sketch2sound: Controllable audio generation via time-varying signals and sonic imitations. In ICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1–5. IEEE,

    2025

  12. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13587 , year=

    John Guibas, Morteza Mardani, Zongyi Li, Andrew Tao, Anima Anandkumar, and Bryan Catan- zaro. Adaptive fourier neural operators: Efficient token mixers for transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13587,

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Pixelvae: A latent variable model for natural images.arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.05013,

    Ishaan Gulrajani, Kundan Kumar, Faruk Ahmed, Adrien Ali Taiga, Francesco Visin, David Vazquez, and Aaron Courville. Pixelvae: A latent variable model for natural images.arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.05013,

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Music tagging with classifier group chains

    Takuya Hasumi, Tatsuya Komatsu, and Yusuke Fujita. Music tagging with classifier group chains. In ICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1–5. IEEE,

    2025

  15. [15]

    Enabling factorized piano music modeling and generation with the maestro dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.12247,

    12 Curtis Hawthorne, Andriy Stasyuk, Adam Roberts, Ian Simon, Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang, Sander Dieleman, Erich Elsen, Jesse Engel, and Douglas Eck. Enabling factorized piano music modeling and generation with the maestro dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.12247,

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Fourier transformer: Fast long range modeling by removing sequence redundancy with fft operator.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15099,

    Ziwei He, Meng Yang, Minwei Feng, Jingcheng Yin, Xinbing Wang, Jingwen Leng, and Zhouhan Lin. Fourier transformer: Fast long range modeling by removing sequence redundancy with fft operator.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15099,

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)

    D Hendrycks. Gaussian error linear units (gelus).arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415,

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  18. [18]

    Noise2Music: Text-conditioned music generation with diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03917,

    Qingqing Huang, Daniel S Park, Tao Wang, Timo I Denk, Andy Ly, Nanxin Chen, Zhengdong Zhang, Zhishuai Zhang, Jiahui Yu, Christian Frank, et al. Noise2music: Text-conditioned music generation with diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03917,

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Tim- bretron: A wavenet (cyclegan (cqt (audio))) pipeline for musical timbre transfer,

    Sicong Huang, Qiyang Li, Cem Anil, Xuchan Bao, Sageev Oore, and Roger B Grosse. Tim- bretron: A wavenet (cyclegan (cqt (audio))) pipeline for musical timbre transfer.arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.09620,

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Fr\’echet audio distance: A metric for evaluating music enhancement algo- rithms,

    Kevin Kilgour, Mauricio Zuluaga, Dominik Roblek, and Matthew Sharifi. Fr\’echet audio distance: A metric for evaluating music enhancement algorithms.arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08466,

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    DiffWave: A Versatile Diffusion Model for Audio Synthesis

    Zhifeng Kong, Wei Ping, Jiaji Huang, Kexin Zhao, and Bryan Catanzaro. Diffwave: A versatile diffusion model for audio synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09761,

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    High- fidelity music vocoder using neural audio codecs

    Luca A Lanzend ¨orfer, Florian Gr ¨otschla, Michael Ungersb ¨ock, and Roger Wattenhofer. High- fidelity music vocoder using neural audio codecs. InICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1–5. IEEE,

    2025

  23. [23]

    BigVGAN: A universal neural vocoder with large-scale training

    Sang-gil Lee, Wei Ping, Boris Ginsburg, Bryan Catanzaro, and Sungroh Yoon. Bigvgan: A universal neural vocoder with large-scale training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.04658,

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Fnet: Mixing tokens with fourier transforms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03824,

    James Lee-Thorp, Joshua Ainslie, Ilya Eckstein, and Santiago Ontanon. Fnet: Mixing tokens with fourier transforms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03824,

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Controllable music production with diffusion models and guidance gradients,

    Mark Levy, Bruno Di Giorgi, Floris Weers, Angelos Katharopoulos, and Tom Nickson. Con- trollable music production with diffusion models and guidance gradients.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00613,

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Audioldm: Text-to-audio generation with latent diffusion models,

    Haohe Liu, Zehua Chen, Yi Yuan, Xinhao Mei, Xubo Liu, Danilo Mandic, Wenwu Wang, and Mark D Plumbley. Audioldm: Text-to-audio generation with latent diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12503,

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Fast training of convolutional networks through ffts.arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5851,

    Michael Mathieu, Mikael Henaff, and Yann LeCun. Fast training of convolutional networks through ffts.arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5851,

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    librosa: Audio and music signal analysis in python.SciPy, 2015:18–24,

    Brian McFee, Colin Raffel, Dawen Liang, Daniel PW Ellis, Matt McVicar, Eric Battenberg, and Oriol Nieto. librosa: Audio and music signal analysis in python.SciPy, 2015:18–24,

    2015

  29. [29]

    SDEdit: Guided Image Synthesis and Editing with Stochastic Differential Equations

    Chenlin Meng, Yutong He, Yang Song, Jiaming Song, Jiajun Wu, Jun-Yan Zhu, and Stefano Ermon. Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073,

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  30. [30]

    A diffusion-based generative equalizer for music restoration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18636,

    Eloi Moliner, Maija Turunen, Filip Elvander, and Vesa V ¨alim¨aki. A diffusion-based generative equalizer for music restoration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18636,

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Fine-grained and inter- pretable neural speech editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05471,

    Max Morrison, Cameron Churchwell, Nathan Pruyne, and Bryan Pardo. Fine-grained and inter- pretable neural speech editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05471,

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Ditto: Diffusion inference-time t-optimization for music generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12179,

    14 Zachary Novack, Julian McAuley, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, and Nicholas J Bryan. Ditto: Diffusion inference-time t-optimization for music generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12179,

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Stemgen: A music generation model that listens

    Julian D Parker, Janne Spijkervet, Katerina Kosta, Furkan Yesiler, Boris Kuznetsov, Ju-Chiang Wang, Matt Avent, Jitong Chen, and Duc Le. Stemgen: A music generation model that listens. In ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1116–1120. IEEE,

    2024

  34. [34]

    Music2latent: Consistency autoencoders for latent audio compression.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06500,

    Marco Pasini, Stefan Lattner, and George Fazekas. Music2latent: Consistency autoencoders for latent audio compression.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06500,

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Analyzing the effect ofk-space features in mri classification models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13589,

    Pascal Passigan and Vayd Ramkumar. Analyzing the effect ofk-space features in mri classification models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13589,

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Ef- ficient autoregressive audio modeling via next-scale prediction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09027,

    Kai Qiu, Xiang Li, Hao Chen, Jie Sun, Jinglu Wang, Zhe Lin, Marios Savvides, and Bhiksha Raj. Ef- ficient autoregressive audio modeling via next-scale prediction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09027,

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations

    Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    Wave-u-net: A multi-scale neural network for end-to-end audio source separation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03185,

    15 Daniel Stoller, Sebastian Ewert, and Simon Dixon. Wave-u-net: A multi-scale neural network for end-to-end audio source separation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03185,

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Subtractive training for music stem insertion using latent diffusion models

    Ivan Villa-Renteria, Mason Long Wang, Zachary Shah, Zhe Li, Soohyun Kim, Neelesh Ramachan- dran, and Mert Pilanci. Subtractive training for music stem insertion using latent diffusion models. InICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process- ing (ICASSP), pp. 1–5. IEEE,

    2025

  40. [40]

    A training-free approach for music style transfer with latent diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15913,

    Heehwan Wang, Joonwoo Kwon, Sooyoung Kim, Shinjae Yoo, Yuewei Lin, and Jiook Cha. A training-free approach for music style transfer with latent diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15913,

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  41. [41]

    Learning hierarchical features from generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08396,

    Shengjia Zhao, Jiaming Song, and Stefano Ermon. Learning hierarchical features from generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08396,

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    A mapping strategy for interacting with latent audio synthesis using artistic materials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04379, 2024a

    Shuoyang Zheng, Anna Xamb ´o Sed ´o, and Nick Bryan-Kinns. A mapping strategy for interacting with latent audio synthesis using artistic materials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04379, 2024a. Tianyi Zheng, Bo Li, Shuang Wu, Ben Wan, Guodong Mu, Shice Liu, Shouhong Ding, and Jia Wang. Mfae: Masked frequency autoencoders for domain generalization face anti-spoof...

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Each(80×1) timeframe is passed through an MLP to obtain an80×512latent sequence

    A.1 ENCODERS We experiment with three encoders: 1.MLP Encoder.The audio is converted into an80×512mel-spectrogram. Each(80×1) timeframe is passed through an MLP to obtain an80×512latent sequence. Since each timeframe is processed independently, this encoder enforces input-output alignment, and results in no leakage between timeframes. 2.1D U-Net Encoder.T...

    2015

  44. [44]

    The hyperparameters for our MLP encoder are listed in Table

    It consists of a series of linear layers with SiLU activations (Hendrycks, 2016), group normalization layers (Wu & He, 2018), and residual connections (He et al., 2016). The hyperparameters for our MLP encoder are listed in Table

    2016

  45. [45]

    Attribute Value Input80×512mel-spectrogram Output80×512latent sequence Architecture Frame-wise MLP Hidden Dim. 512 Num. Hidden Layers 16 Table 2: MLP Encoder Architecture 6https://github.com/maswang32/latentfouriertransform/ 18 A.1.2 1D U-NETENCODERARCHITECTURE Our 1D U-Net encoder is a 1D version of the encoder used in Karras et al. (2022). The convoluti...

    2022

  46. [46]

    First, it creates a 1024×512sequence of continuous embeddings using the encoder of Descript Audio Codec (Kumar et al., 2023)

    Attribute Value Input80×512mel-spectrogram Output80×512latent sequence Architecture 1D U-Net Kernel Size 3 Resolutions [512, 256, 128, 64, 32, 16] Channels Per Resolution [512, 512, 512, 768, 768, 1024] Resolutions with Attention [64, 32, 16] Table 3: 1D U-Net Encoder Hyperparameters A.1.3 DAC ENCODERARCHITECTURE The DAC encoder takes in a raw audio wavef...

    2023

  47. [47]

    In addition, following Karras et al

    We use a linear warmup for the first 4,000 training steps, and we apply cosine annealing to the learning rate after 350k iterations. In addition, following Karras et al. (2022), we store an exponential moving average of the model weights, which we use for inference. Hyperpa- rameters for this are shown in Table

    2022

  48. [48]

    The dataset is publicly available, and is popular in tasks like neural audio compression, vocod- ing (Lanzend¨orfer et al., 2025), and music-tagging (Hasumi et al., 2025)

    is a large-scale collection of over 55,000 spanning diverse genres, like classical, electronic, pop, and rock music. The dataset is publicly available, and is popular in tasks like neural audio compression, vocod- ing (Lanzend¨orfer et al., 2025), and music-tagging (Hasumi et al., 2025). We train our mod- els on a dataset of 2.5 million 5.9-second clips f...

    2025

  49. [49]

    We use GTZAN for the interpretability experiment (Sec

    is a standard benchmark for genre classifi- cation, containing 1,000 30-second audio clips evenly distributed across 10 genres (blues, 20 classical, country, disco, hip-hop, jazz, metal, pop, reggae, and rock). We use GTZAN for the interpretability experiment (Sec. 4.6), since we require high-quality genre labels. We show results on more datasets in Appen...

    2018

  50. [50]

    Ability to Blend

    21 System 1 System 2p-value, Audio Qualityp-Value, Ability to Blend LATENTFT Cross Synthesis1.59×10 −3 9.54×10 −2∗ LATENTFT ILVR3.83×10 −4 8.84×10 −7 LATENTFT VampNet7.02×10 −10 1.64×10 −10 Cross Synthesis ILVR9.51×10 −2∗ 6.62×10 −4 Cross Synthesis VampNet1.91×10 −6 8.09×10 −10 ILVR VampNet1.55×10 −6 1.69×10 −5 Table 8: Results from a Kruskal-Wallis H tes...

    1977

  51. [51]

    overall accuracy

    package. First, we use Essentia’s algorithm to predict the predominant pitch (the pitch of the melody) in a song. Then, we compute the “overall accuracy” metric described in Salamon et al. (2014), to measure how well the pitches of the generated variation match with the reference. Again, we plot the pitch accuracy against 22 the latent frequencies that we...

    2014

  52. [52]

    Adherence Quality Loudness↑Rhythm↑Timbre↓Harmony↓FAD↓ LATENTFT-MLP0.6780.8751.030 0.1091.371 w/o Freq

    Ablating any component of the model generally leads to worse audio quality and adherence. Adherence Quality Loudness↑Rhythm↑Timbre↓Harmony↓FAD↓ LATENTFT-MLP0.6780.8751.030 0.1091.371 w/o Freq. Masking 0.5970.9021.152 0.127 4.789 w/o Correlation 0.635 0.885 1.167 0.115 2.534 w/o Log. Scale 0.535 0.827 1.382 0.111 2.119 w/o Encoder 0.030 0.539 4.026 0.1470....

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    w/o Freq. Masking

    Ablating any component of the model generally leads to either significantly worse audio qual- ity, or significantly worse adherence. Ablating Frequency Masking During Training.First, we ablate frequency masking during train- ing, applying only the inference-time user-specified mask. Previous methods apply frequency- masking post-hoc, toanalyzea pretrained...

    2020

  54. [54]

    w/o Correlation

    Our strategy of correlating scores results in large, contiguous regions of unmasked and masked bins, which makes the learning task more difficult, and better reflects inference-time, user-specified masks. Tables 9 and 10 (“w/o Correlation”) verify that using an uncorrelated mask results in substantial degradations to audio quality. 24 0 20 40 60 80 100 12...

    2048

  55. [55]

    This indicates that LA- TENTFT can work on recordings that are only piano, or on datasets with a diverse set of genres

    Although LA- TENTFT performs worse in terms of audio quality compared to our evaluations on MTG-Jamendo, we find that it outperforms our baselines on both GTZAN and Maestro. This indicates that LA- TENTFT can work on recordings that are only piano, or on datasets with a diverse set of genres. Conditional Generation Blending Adherence Quality Adherence to ...

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Cross Synthesis also only applies to the blending task

    The Masked Token Model and Cross Synthesis baselines do not offer frequency-based controls, so we do not compute adherence. Cross Synthesis also only applies to the blending task. Conditional Generation Blending Adherence Quality Adherence to Both Inputs Quality Loud.↑Rhyth.↑Timb.↓Harm.↓FAD↓Loud.↑Rhyth.↑Timb.↓Harm.↓FAD↓ Vampnet - - - - 11.914 - - - - 14.8...

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Chord changes also occur at low frequencies, with peak preservation between 0.25–2 Hz

    Across several musical styles, we see the trend that genre tends to lie in the frequency range around 0 Hz, indicating that it is a global characteristic. Chord changes also occur at low frequencies, with peak preservation between 0.25–2 Hz. Tempo and pitch occur at higher la- tent frequencies, since prominent rhythmic and melodic patterns are typically m...

    2022

  58. [58]

    Removing DFT Masking

    For audio examples, refer to the website under “Removing DFT Masking”. 1 2 3 4 5 Time (s) 512 1024 2048 4096 8192Hz Reference 1 2 3 4 5 Time (s) Generation 1 2 3 4 5 Time (s) 512 1024 2048 4096 8192Hz Reference 1 2 3 4 5 Time (s) Generation 1 2 3 4 5 Time (s) 512 1024 2048 4096 8192Hz Reference 1 2 3 4 5 Time (s) Generation Figure 12: Mel-spectrograms whe...

    2048

  59. [59]

    Generative Audio Equalizer.Similar to our work, Moliner et al

    providing anintuitive, non-heuristicway of specifying scales via Hz. Generative Audio Equalizer.Similar to our work, Moliner et al. (2024) introduce a diffusion- based generative audio equalizer. While this work generates content at selectedaudiblefrequencies, we generate content atlatentfrequencies. Other Uses of the Fourier Transform in Deep Learning.Th...

    2024