pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18063 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Influence of near-field effect on magnetic hysteresis in magneto-active elastomers

Pawan Patel , Dirk Romeis , Marina Saphiannikova This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords magneto-active elastomersmagnetic hysteresisnear-field effectsmicrostructural rearrangementsdipole interactionselastic compositesmultiscale modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hysteresis in magneto-active elastomers with soft particles arises from trapped microstructural rearrangements due to near-field magnetic interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a multiscale theoretical framework to explain the origin of magnetic hysteresis in magneto-active elastomers, which are elastic materials filled with magnetic particles. It shows that even with magnetically soft particles, the material remembers its magnetic history because the particles rearrange into different patterns when the external field increases compared to when it decreases. These patterns get trapped by the balance between magnetic forces and the resistance from the elastic polymer matrix. The inclusion of near-field corrections to the usual dipole approximation proves essential for capturing the behavior at realistic particle densities. Understanding this process matters for applications where the material needs to respond predictably to magnetic fields, such as in adjustable stiffness devices or shape-changing actuators.

Core claim

The total energy, combining magnetic contributions from particle interactions (modeled with dipole-dipole plus higher-order near-field terms) and micromechanical elastic energies, is minimized under the constraint of fixed macroscopic sample shape. This minimization reveals that hysteresis loops form because the microstructure evolves along different paths during field increase and decrease, with near-field effects enhancing the trapping of particles in metastable configurations at close separations.

What carries the argument

Energy minimization of combined magnetic (dipole and near-field) and elastic contributions under fixed cylindrical sample deformation.

Load-bearing premise

The macroscopic shape of the cylindrical sample remains completely fixed with no overall deformation permitted during the magnetization cycle.

What would settle it

Microscopic observation or simulation showing that at the same applied field value, the average particle positions or orientations differ measurably between the ascending and descending branches of the magnetic field cycle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18063 by Dirk Romeis, Marina Saphiannikova, Pawan Patel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The magneto-mechanical collapse in a system of two magnetic particles upon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Left: MAE disc between the poles of a VSM device [33], with an external [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) Example energy landscape from Eq. 15 with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) The difference between the critical volume fractions inside columnar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Computation of equilibrium local volume fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Microstructure evolution quantified by the equilibrium local particle volume [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Effect of the micromechanical constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Effect of the micromechanical constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Effect of total volume fraction on the width of the hysteresis loop for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Comparing the different operators after integration over the azimuthal and polar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magneto-active elastomers (MAEs) are polymer composites consisting of magnetic microparticles embedded in an elastomeric matrix. These materials exhibit strong magneto-mechanical coupling under external magnetic fields, resulting in tunable stiffness, reversible shape changes, and nonlinear magnetic responses. This study presents a multiscale theoretical framework to investigate the origin of magnetic hysteresis in MAEs, with emphasis on the evolution of the internal microstructure during magnetization and demagnetization. The total energy of the system is formulated as the sum of magnetic and micromechanical contributions, while macroscopic deformation of a cylindrical MAE sample is fully constrained. Particle interactions are modeled first via pure dipole-dipole interactions and then extended to include higher-order near-field effects at close particle separations. The results show that hysteresis in MAEs with magnetically soft particles primarily arises from trapped microstructural rearrangements, leading to distinct particle configurations under increasing and decreasing magnetic fields. Parametric studies demonstrate that particle volume fraction, sample aspect ratio, and matrix stiffness strongly influence the microstructure evolution and the width of resulting hysteresis loops. The proposed framework provides a solid foundation for modeling magnetic hysteresis, which is essential for the design and optimization of MAEs in practical applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a multiscale theoretical framework for magneto-active elastomers (MAEs) consisting of magnetically soft particles in an elastomeric matrix. The total energy is expressed as the sum of magnetic (dipole-dipole plus near-field corrections at close separations) and micromechanical terms. Macroscopic deformation of a cylindrical sample is fully constrained at all times. The central claim is that magnetic hysteresis arises primarily from trapped microstructural rearrangements that produce distinct particle configurations during field increase versus decrease. Parametric studies on particle volume fraction, sample aspect ratio, and matrix stiffness are used to show their effects on microstructure evolution and hysteresis-loop width.

Significance. If the numerical observations hold under less restrictive boundary conditions and with experimental validation, the work would provide a mechanistic explanation for hysteresis in soft-particle MAEs that goes beyond simple dipole models. The explicit inclusion of near-field effects and the focus on configuration trapping constitute a useful modeling advance for the design of MAE-based devices. At present the absence of any reported comparison to measured loops or magnetostriction data limits the immediate significance.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model formulation and boundary conditions] The model enforces zero overall strain on the cylindrical sample at all times (fully constrained macroscopic deformation). This boundary condition is load-bearing for the claim that hysteresis originates from trapped rearrangements, because it forbids any global magnetostrictive elongation or contraction that would otherwise modify the micromechanical energy landscape and the multiplicity of stable particle configurations. Real MAEs typically exhibit modest magnetostriction; if even small shape changes are allowed, the reported hysteresis could be substantially reduced or eliminated.
  2. [Numerical implementation] No derivation details, discretization scheme, convergence criteria, or error estimates are supplied for the numerical solution of the coupled magneto-mechanical problem. Since the central claim rests entirely on the observation of distinct configurations under increasing versus decreasing fields, the lack of these elements makes it impossible to judge whether the hysteresis is robust or an artifact of the chosen numerical tolerances.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that parametric studies demonstrate the influence of volume fraction, aspect ratio, and stiffness on loop width, yet does not indicate whether these parameters were varied independently or adjusted to match any reference data. This should be stated explicitly to remove any appearance of circularity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model formulation and boundary conditions] The model enforces zero overall strain on the cylindrical sample at all times (fully constrained macroscopic deformation). This boundary condition is load-bearing for the claim that hysteresis originates from trapped rearrangements, because it forbids any global magnetostrictive elongation or contraction that would otherwise modify the micromechanical energy landscape and the multiplicity of stable particle configurations. Real MAEs typically exhibit modest magnetostriction; if even small shape changes are allowed, the reported hysteresis could be substantially reduced or eliminated.

    Authors: We agree that the fully constrained boundary condition is central to the reported hysteresis, as it prevents global shape changes that could otherwise allow additional relaxation paths. Our model is formulated for this constrained case, which is relevant to many device geometries and experimental setups where samples are mechanically fixed. The distinct particle configurations arise from irreversible rearrangements trapped by the micromechanical energy under this constraint. We acknowledge that permitting modest magnetostriction could modify the hysteresis width. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated discussion of this limitation and include a parametric study with small allowed axial strains to quantify the sensitivity of the hysteresis to the boundary condition. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical implementation] No derivation details, discretization scheme, convergence criteria, or error estimates are supplied for the numerical solution of the coupled magneto-mechanical problem. Since the central claim rests entirely on the observation of distinct configurations under increasing versus decreasing fields, the lack of these elements makes it impossible to judge whether the hysteresis is robust or an artifact of the chosen numerical tolerances.

    Authors: We regret the omission of these numerical details. The coupled problem is solved by minimizing the total energy (magnetic dipole plus near-field terms plus elastic energy) with respect to particle positions and matrix deformation. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection that specifies the discretization (finite-element mesh for the elastomer with embedded rigid particles), the iterative minimization algorithm, the convergence tolerance on the total energy (relative change < 10^{-6}), and mesh-refinement studies demonstrating that the observed configuration trapping and hysteresis loop width converge with respect to spatial resolution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained theoretical model

full rationale

The paper formulates a multiscale energy-based model (magnetic + micromechanical contributions) under an explicit boundary condition of fully constrained macroscopic deformation for a cylindrical sample. Hysteresis is shown to emerge from the resulting trapped particle rearrangements when near-field interactions are included. Parametric studies on volume fraction, aspect ratio, and stiffness are presented as explorations of how these inputs affect loop width, with no indication that any output quantity is obtained by fitting to the same data used to demonstrate the claim. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, no ansatz is smuggled, and no known result is merely renamed. The derivation chain therefore does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard continuum elasticity plus a dipole-plus-near-field magnetic interaction model; no new particles or forces are postulated, but the assumption of fully constrained macroscopic strain and the numerical treatment of particle rearrangements introduce several domain-specific modeling choices whose sensitivity is not quantified in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Macroscopic deformation of the cylindrical sample is fully constrained
    Stated in the abstract as the boundary condition for all simulations
  • domain assumption Particle interactions can be modeled first by pure dipole-dipole and then extended by higher-order near-field terms at close separations
    Central modeling choice described in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5503 in / 1420 out tokens · 32870 ms · 2026-05-10T04:15:04.406701+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    15 is denoted by ∆Φ ∗ = ϕ∗ p −ϕin the following

    The scenario of increasing field strength The value of ∆Φ which minimizes the total energy in Eq. 15 is denoted by ∆Φ ∗ = ϕ∗ p −ϕin the following. It defines the equilibrium particle enrichment within the columnar microstructure for a given applied fieldH 0, or equivalently the parameterK. In the absence 9 of an external field (H0 = 0,K= 0), this minimum ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The scenario of decreasing field strength We consider a very high initial magnetic field strength, such that the particle distribution corresponds to the densely clustered state (purple curve in Fig. 3(a). Upon decreasing the magnetic field, i.e., reducingK, a local minimum emerges at ∆Φ ∗ in addition to the global minimum at ∆Φ max (green and blue curves...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Upper critical value where no ’jump’ is possible For certain parameter combinations, it may occur thatK ∗↓ ≥K ∗↑. In this case, no hys- teresis is observed: both the local volume fractionϕ p and the magnetization vary smoothly and reversibly along the same branch upon increasing and decreasing the external magnetic field. The absence of a discontinuous tr...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Upon increasing the external field, the transition occurs atK ∗↑: the local particle volume fraction inside the columnar structures jumps fromϕ ↑ p =ϕ+ A 3α toϕ max

    Analysis of the linear magnetization regime In the following, we focus on the regimeϕ < ϕ ∗∗, where a discontinuous transition and, consequently, magnetic hysteresis are predicted. Upon increasing the external field, the transition occurs atK ∗↑: the local particle volume fraction inside the columnar structures jumps fromϕ ↑ p =ϕ+ A 3α toϕ max. Conversely...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Y. Sun, W. Zhang, J. Gu, L. Xia, Y. Cao, X. Zhu, H. Wen, S. Ouyang, R. Liu, J. Li, Z. Jiang, D. Cheng, Y. Lv, X. Han, W. Qiu, K. Cai, E. Song, Q. Cao, and L. Li, Magnetically driven capsules with multimodal response and multifunctionality for biomedical applications, Nature Communications15, 1839 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    X. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Xiang, F. Liao, N. Li, J. Li, J. Wang, Q. Wu, C. Zhou, Y. Yang, Y. Kou, Y. Yang, H. Tang, N. Zhou, C. Wan, Z. Yin, G.-Z. Yang, G. Tao, and J. Zang, Magnetic soft microfiberbots for robotic embolization, Science Robotics9, eadh2479 (2024), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/scirobotics.adh2479

    work page doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adh2479 2024

  7. [7]

    L. A. Makarova, Y. A. Alekhina, T. S. Rusakova, and N. S. Perov, Tunable properties of magnetoactive elastomers for biomedical applications, Physics Procedia82, 38 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    L. A. Makarova, T. A. Nadzharyan, Y. A. Alekhina, G. V. Stepanov, E. G. Kazimirova, N. S. Perov, and E. Y. Kramarenko, Magnetoactive elastomer as an element of a magnetic retina fixator, Smart Materials and Structures26, 095054 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Reiche, L

    M. Reiche, L. Zentner, D. Borin, F. Becker, and T. Becker, Bi-directional vibration-driven mobile robots based on multipole magnetoactive elastomers, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters9, 8961 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    W. Han, W. Gao, and X. Wang, Enhanced magnetic soft robotics: Integrating fiber optics and 3d printing for rapid actuation and precision sensing, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 16, 30396 (2024), pMID: 38820388, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c04586

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.4c04586 2024

  11. [11]

    Kriegl, M

    R. Kriegl, M. Jezerˇ sek, G. Kravanja, L. Hribar, S. M Mukhi, G. Kokot, I. Drevenˇ sek-Olenik, and M. Shamonin, Tunable rebound of millimeter-sized rigid balls by magnetic actuation of elastomer-based surface microstructures, Smart Materials and Structures33, 067001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Straus, G

    I. Straus, G. Kravanja, L. Hribar, R. Kriegl, M. Jezerˇ sek, M. Shamonin, I. Drevensek-Olenik, and G. Kokot, Surface modification of magnetoactive elastomers by laser micromachining, 28 Materials17, 1550 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    P. A. S´ anchez, E. S. Minina, S. S. Kantorovich, and E. Y. Kramarenko, Surface relief of magne- toactive elastomeric films in a homogeneous magnetic field: molecular dynamics simulations, Soft Matter15, 175 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Hermann, P

    S. Hermann, P. Butaud, G. Chevallier, J.-F. Manceau, and C. Espanet, Magnetic and dynamic mechanical properties of a highly coercive mre based on ndfeb particles and a stiff matrix, Smart Materials and Structures29, 105009 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    M. A. Moreno-Mateos, M. Hossain, P. Steinmann, and D. Garcia-Gonzalez, Hard magnet- ics in ultra-soft magnetorheological elastomers enhance fracture toughness and delay crack propagation, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids173, 105232 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    H. Ye, Y. Li, and T. Zhang, Magttice: a lattice model for hard-magnetic soft materials, Soft Matter17, 3560 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Moreno, J

    M. Moreno, J. Gonzalez-Rico, M. Lopez-Donaire, A. Arias, and D. Garcia-Gonzalez, New experimental insights into magneto-mechanical rate dependences of magnetorheological elas- tomers, Composites Part B: Engineering224, 109148 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Garcia-Gonzalez, M

    D. Garcia-Gonzalez, M. Moreno, L. Valencia, A. Arias, and D. Velasco, Influence of elastomeric matrix and particle volume fraction on the mechanical response of magneto-active polymers, Composites Part B: Engineering215, 108796 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    A. D. Charles, A. N. Rider, S. A. Brown, and C. H. Wang, Improving the actuation perfor- mance of magneto-polymer composites by silane functionalisation of carbonyl-iron particles, Composites Part B: Engineering196, 108091 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Borin, G

    D. Borin, G. Stepanov, A. Musikhin, A. Zubarev, A. Bakhtiiarov, and P. Storozhenko, Mag- netorheological effect of magnetoactive elastomer with a permalloy filler, Polymers12, 2371 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    T. I. Becker, O. V. Stolbov, D. Y. Borin, K. Zimmermann, and Y. L. Raikher, Basic magnetic properties of magnetoactive elastomers of mixed content, Smart Materials and Structures29, 075034 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Maas and D

    J. Maas and D. Uhlenbusch, Experimental and theoretical analysis of the actuation behavior of magnetoactive elastomers, Smart Materials and Structures25, 104002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Krautz, D

    M. Krautz, D. Werner, M. Schr¨ odner, A. Funk, A. Jantz, J. Popp, J. Eckert, and A. Waske, Hysteretic behavior of soft magnetic elastomer composites, Journal of Magnetism and Mag- 29 netic Materials426, 60 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    D. Y. Borin and M. V. Vaganov, Forc analysis of magnetically soft microparticles embedded in a polymeric elastic environment, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics55, 155001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    A. M. Biller, O. V. Stolbov, and Y. L. Raikher, Modeling of particle interactions in magne- torheological elastomers, Journal of Applied Physics116, 114904 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    A. M. Biller, O. V. Stolbov, and Y. L. Raikher, Mesoscopic magnetomechanical hysteresis in a magnetorheological elastomer, Phys. Rev. E92, 023202 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    M. V. Vaganov and Y. L. Raikher, Effect of mesoscopic magnetomechanical hysteresis on magnetization curves and first-order reversal curve diagrams of magnetoactive elastomers, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics53, 405002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    A. M. Biller, O. V. Stolbov, and Y. L. Raikher, Effect of magnetomechanical hysteresis on the field-induced oscillations of particles in a magnetoactive elastomer, Phys. Rev. E110, 064501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    A. Y. Zubarev, D. N. Chirikov, D. Y. Borin, and G. V. Stepanov, Hysteresis of the magnetic properties of soft magnetic gels, Soft Matter12, 6473 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Glavan, I

    G. Glavan, I. A. Belyaeva, I. Drevenˇ sek-Olenik, and M. Shamonin, Experimental study of longitudinal, transverse and volume strains of magnetoactive elastomeric cylinders in uniform magnetic fields, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials579, 170826 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    G. V. Stepanov and A. Y. Zubarev, Hysteretic behavior and non-linear uniaxial deformations in magnetic elastomer under the influence of an external magnetic field, Smart Materials and Structures34, 125002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Puljiz, S

    M. Puljiz, S. Huang, K. A. Kalina, J. Nowak, S. Odenbach, M. K¨ astner, G. K. Auernhammer, and A. M. Menzel, Reversible magnetomechanical collapse: virtual touching and detachment of rigid inclusions in a soft elastic matrix, Soft Matter14, 6809 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    K. A. Kalina, A. R. loff, M. Wollner, P. Metsch, J. Brummund, and M. K¨ astner, Multiscale modeling and simulation of magneto-active elastomers based on experimental data, Physical Sciences Reviews8, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Metsch, D

    P. Metsch, D. Romeis, K. A. Kalina, A. Raßloff, M. Saphiannikova, and M. K¨ astner, Magneto- mechanical coupling in magneto-active elastomers, Materials14, 434 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Gebhart and T

    P. Gebhart and T. Wallmersperger, Modeling of hysteresis effects in magneto-active polymers: constitutive theory and variational principles, Acta Mechanica 10.1007/s00707-025-04274-0 30 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1007/s00707-025-04274-0 2025

  36. [36]

    Romeis and M

    D. Romeis and M. Saphiannikova, A cascading mean-field approach to the calculation of magnetization fields in magnetoactive elastomers, Polymers13, 1372 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Roghani, D

    M. Roghani, D. Romeis, D. Borin, and M. Saphiannikova, Influence of matrix stiffness on microstructure evolution and magnetization of magneto-active elastomers, Soft Matter21, 1416 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Patel, M

    P. Patel, M. Roghani, D. Borin, D. Romeis, and M. Saphiannikova, Investigating the role of microstructure evolution on properties of magneto-active elastomers, inAdvances in the Textile and Clothing Research : Volume 1: Fiber Science, Springer Proceedings in Materials, edited by Y. Kyosev, C. Cherif, O. Kyzymchuk, K. Hesse, and P. Penzel (Springer, 2026)

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    Roghani, D

    M. Roghani, D. Romeis, and M. Saphiannikova, Effect of microstructure evolution on the mechanical behavior of magneto-active elastomers with different matrix stiffness, Soft Matter 19, 6387 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ishii, Simple and approximate expressions of demagnetizing factors of uni- formly magnetized rectangular rod and cylinder, Journal of Applied Physics66, 983 (1989)

    work page 1989

  41. [41]

    Chougale, D

    S. Chougale, D. Romeis, and M. Saphiannikova, Magneto-mechanical enhancement of elas- tic moduli in magnetoactive elastomers with anisotropic microstructures, Materials15, 645 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    R. G. Larson,The Structure and Rheology of Complex Fluids(Oxford University Press, New York, 1999)

    work page 1999

  43. [43]

    Gundermann and S

    T. Gundermann and S. Odenbach, Investigation of the motion of particles in magnetorheo- logical elastomers by X-µCT, Smart Materials and Structures23, 105013 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Yaremchuk, D

    D. Yaremchuk, D. Ivaneyko, and J. Ilnytskyi, Magnetostriction in the magneto-sensitive elas- tomers with inhomogeneously magnetized particles: Pairwise interaction approximation, Jour- nal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials589, 171554 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Ivaneyko, V

    D. Ivaneyko, V. Toshchevikov, M. Saphiannikova, and G. Heinrich, Mechanical properties of magneto-sensitive elastomers: unification of the continuum-mechanics and microscopic theo- retical approaches, Soft Matter10, 2213 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Romeis, V

    D. Romeis, V. Toshchevikov, and M. Saphiannikova, Elongated micro-structures in magneto- sensitive elastomers: a dipolar mean field model, Soft Matter12, 9364 (2016). 31

    work page 2016