pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18093 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Polarization Engineering of the Orbital Hall Conductivity in Two-dimensional Ferroelectric Higher-Order Topological Insulator Tl₂S and SnS

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ferroelectric higher-order topological insulatororbital Hall conductivitypolarization engineeringtwo-dimensional materialsTl2SSnSorbitronicsin-plane polarization
0
0 comments X

The pith

In-plane polarization reversibly switches the orbital Hall conductivity plateau inside the band gap of 2D ferroelectric HOTIs like SnS.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how ferroelectric polarization interacts with higher-order band topology in two-dimensional insulators. It identifies a strong coupling that lets in-plane polarization control the orbital Hall conductivity, allowing the OHC plateau to be turned on or off by reversing the polarization direction while remaining inside the energy gap. Out-of-plane polarized cases lack this reversible control and instead show steady orbital transport. Tl2S and SnS serve as concrete models for the two polarization types, illustrating persistent versus switchable behaviors. The results point to polarization as a built-in handle for tuning orbital effects in these materials.

Core claim

In two-dimensional ferroelectric higher-order topological insulators, in-plane polarization couples strongly to the higher-order topology and thereby reversibly switches the orbital Hall conductivity plateau that sits inside the band gap. This switching is demonstrated in SnS, while Tl2S with out-of-plane polarization maintains a persistent, non-switchable OHC. The distinct transport behaviors arise directly from the direction of the ferroelectric polarization and its effect on the topological orbital response.

What carries the argument

The strong coupling between in-plane ferroelectric polarization and higher-order band topology that modulates the orbital Hall conductivity plateau.

If this is right

  • Reversing in-plane polarization in SnS toggles the OHC plateau on and off electrically while staying inside the gap.
  • Tl2S exhibits stable orbital Hall conductivity that does not switch with polarization reversal.
  • Polarization direction determines whether orbital transport is persistent or electrically controllable in ferroelectric HOTIs.
  • The mechanism supplies an intrinsic route to polarization-engineered orbitronic responses without external fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar in-plane polarization switching of orbital currents may occur in other 2D ferroelectric materials with higher-order topology.
  • The gap-protected OHC switching could be combined with ferroelectric gates to create low-dissipation orbital current modulators.
  • Heterostructures that stack these HOTIs with conventional ferroelectrics might extend the switching range to room temperature.

Load-bearing premise

First-principles calculations of the band topology and orbital transport in Tl2S and SnS accurately capture the real interplay with ferroelectric polarization without major errors from exchange-correlation approximations.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement in which reversing the in-plane polarization in SnS leaves the OHC plateau unchanged inside the band gap would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18093 by Heng Gao, Wei Ren, Yabei Wu, YingJie Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (b), that possesses only C3 rotation symmetry. Phonon spectrum calculations [Fig. S3(b)] show no im￾gaginary frequencies, confirming its dynamic stability. Electronic band structure analysis reveals that the P3 phase is a semiconductor with a band gap of 1.34 eV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Finite triangular nanoflake of the P3 phase (top and side views of the Tl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Orbital-weighted Berry curvature of intermediate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The crystal structure of intermediate phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Orbital-weighted Berry curvature of intermediate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ferroelectric higher-order topological insulators (HOTIs) exhibit tunable physical properties arising from the interplay between ferroelectric polarization and band topology. This work investigates the topological origin of two classes of two-dimensional (2D) ferroelectric HOTIs with out-of-plane or in-plane polarization, revealing their distinct orbital transport behaviors and the mechanism for engineering orbital Hall conductivity (OHC) via polarization control. Our results demonstrate the unique role of polarization in modulating both the higher-order band topology and orbital transport. A strong coupling between in-plane polarization and higher-order topology is identified, establishing in-plane polarization as an intrinsic means to reversibly switch the OHC plateau within the band gap. Using Tl$_2$S and SnS as representative models of the two HOTI types, we demonstrate persistent and electrically switchable orbital transport, respectively. Our study advances the understanding of the coupling among ferroelectricity, higher-order topology, and orbital transport, offering new avenues for controllable orbitronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates two classes of 2D ferroelectric higher-order topological insulators (HOTIs): Tl₂S with out-of-plane polarization and SnS with in-plane polarization. Using first-principles calculations, it claims to identify distinct orbital transport behaviors, demonstrate a strong coupling between in-plane polarization and higher-order topology, and show that polarization reversal in SnS reversibly switches the orbital Hall conductivity (OHC) plateau within the band gap while Tl₂S exhibits persistent orbital transport.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would establish in-plane ferroelectric polarization as an intrinsic control knob for quantized orbital transport in HOTIs, advancing the field of orbitronics by linking ferroelectricity, higher-order band topology, and orbital Hall effects. The distinction between the two polarization classes and the proposed electrical switchability represent potentially useful conceptual advances, though their robustness depends on the accuracy of the underlying electronic-structure results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Computational Methods and Results for SnS] The headline result of reversible OHC-plateau switching in SnS rests on PBE-level DFT band structures and orbital Berry-phase calculations. Standard PBE is known to underestimate gaps and can reorder bands near the Fermi level in Sn- and Tl-based compounds; this directly impacts both the quadrupole invariant defining the HOTI phase and the energy window of the claimed OHC quantization. No comparison with hybrid functionals (HSE06) or GW is reported to test whether the gap and topological character survive under polarization reversal. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Orbital Hall Conductivity Calculations] The assertion that the OHC plateau lies inside the band gap and is switched by polarization reversal requires explicit demonstration that the gap remains open and the higher-order invariant is preserved across the polarization states. Without reported convergence tests (k-mesh density, slab thickness, or vacuum spacing) or error estimates on the Berry-phase integrals, the quantization and its switchability cannot be considered established.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a clearer statement of which material corresponds to which polarization direction and which exhibits persistent versus switchable transport.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for the orbital Hall conductivity (e.g., units, sign convention, and definition of the plateau value) should be defined consistently in the main text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions we will incorporate to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Computational Methods and Results for SnS] The headline result of reversible OHC-plateau switching in SnS rests on PBE-level DFT band structures and orbital Berry-phase calculations. Standard PBE is known to underestimate gaps and can reorder bands near the Fermi level in Sn- and Tl-based compounds; this directly impacts both the quadrupole invariant defining the HOTI phase and the energy window of the claimed OHC quantization. No comparison with hybrid functionals (HSE06) or GW is reported to test whether the gap and topological character survive under polarization reversal. This is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the PBE functional can underestimate band gaps and potentially affect band ordering, which is relevant for confirming the robustness of the higher-order topological invariant and the OHC quantization window. Our PBE results show a clear gap and preserved quadrupole invariant for both polarization states in SnS, consistent with the reported OHC plateau switching. To address this concern rigorously, we will add HSE06 hybrid functional calculations in the revised manuscript to verify that the gap remains open and the topological character is preserved under polarization reversal. These additional results will be presented alongside the PBE data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Orbital Hall Conductivity Calculations] The assertion that the OHC plateau lies inside the band gap and is switched by polarization reversal requires explicit demonstration that the gap remains open and the higher-order invariant is preserved across the polarization states. Without reported convergence tests (k-mesh density, slab thickness, or vacuum spacing) or error estimates on the Berry-phase integrals, the quantization and its switchability cannot be considered established.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit convergence tests and error estimates were not reported in the original manuscript, even though our calculations were performed with converged parameters. In the revised version, we will include detailed convergence tests with respect to k-mesh density, slab thickness, and vacuum spacing. We will also provide error estimates on the Berry-phase integrals and explicitly demonstrate that the band gap remains open with the higher-order invariant preserved for both polarization states in SnS, thereby confirming the switchability of the OHC plateau within the gap. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard first-principles topology and transport calculations

full rationale

The paper computes band structures, higher-order topological invariants (quadrupole moment), and orbital Hall conductivity from first-principles DFT for Tl2S and SnS under varying ferroelectric polarization. These quantities are obtained via independent standard formulas (Berry phase, Kubo formalism) applied to the calculated electronic states; none are defined in terms of the target OHC plateau or switchability result. No self-citations are load-bearing for the central claims, no parameters are fitted to the target observable, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The polarization dependence is an external input varied in the calculations, not a self-referential loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the work relies on standard density-functional theory and topological band-theory methods whose specific approximations and convergence parameters are not stated; no new entities are postulated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5482 in / 1197 out tokens · 37008 ms · 2026-05-10T04:06:19.211812+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: topological insulators, Reviews of modern physics 82, 3045 (2010)

  2. [2]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Reviews of modern physics 83, 1057 (2011)

  3. [3]

    Shen, Topological insulators , Vol

    S.-Q. Shen, Topological insulators , Vol. 174 (Springer, 2012)

  4. [4]

    B. A. Bernevig and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall ef- fect, Physical review letters 96, 106802 (2006)

  5. [5]

    Vishwanath and T

    A. Vishwanath and T. Senthil, Physics of three- dimensional bosonic topological insulators: Surface- deconfined criticality and quantized magnetoelectric ef- fect, Physical Review X 3, 011016 (2013)

  6. [6]

    Schindler, A

    F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topological insulators, Science advances 4, eaat0346 (2018)

  7. [7]

    Franca, J

    S. Franca, J. Van den Brink, and I. Fulga, An anomalous higher-order topological insulator, Physical Review B 98, 201114 (2018)

  8. [8]

    Khalaf, Higher-order topological insulators and super- conductors protected by inversion symmetry, Physical Review B 97, 205136 (2018)

    E. Khalaf, Higher-order topological insulators and super- conductors protected by inversion symmetry, Physical Review B 97, 205136 (2018)

  9. [9]

    Z. Wang, B. J. Wieder, J. Li, B. Yan, and B. A. Bernevig, Higher-order topology, monopole nodal lines, and the ori- gin of large fermi arcs in transition metal dichalcogenides x te 2 (x= mo, w), Physical review letters 123, 186401 (2019)

  10. [10]

    G. Liu, H. Jiang, Z. Guo, X. Zhang, L. Jin, C. Liu, and Y. Liu, Magnetic second-order topological insulators in 2h-transition metal dichalcogenides, Advanced Science 10, 2301952 (2023)

  11. [11]

    Y. Hu, H. Gao, and W. Ren, Ferroelectric polariza- tion controlled orbital hall conductivity in a higher-order topological insulator: d 1 t-phase monolayer mos 2, Phys- ical Review B 110, 054106 (2024)

  12. [12]

    Qian, G.-B

    S. Qian, G.-B. Liu, C.-C. Liu, and Y. Yao, C n-symmetric higher-order topological crystalline insulators in atomi- cally thin transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Re- view B 105, 045417 (2022)

  13. [13]

    M. J. Park, Y. Kim, G. Y. Cho, and S. Lee, Higher- order topological insulator in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical review letters 123, 216803 (2019)

  14. [14]

    M. Jung, R. G. Gladstone, and G. Shvets, Nanopo- laritonic second-order topological insulator based on graphene plasmons, Advanced Photonics 2, 046003 (2020)

  15. [15]

    C. Chen, Z. Song, J.-Z. Zhao, Z. Chen, Z.-M. Yu, X.-L. Sheng, and S. A. Yang, Universal approach to magnetic second-order topological insulator, Physical Review Let- ters 125, 056402 (2020)

  16. [16]

    L. Cai, R. Li, X. Wu, B. Huang, Y. Dai, and C. Niu, Second-order topological insulators and tunable topolog- ical phase transitions in honeycomb ferromagnets, Phys- ical Review B 107, 245116 (2023)

  17. [17]

    Wang, X.-P

    X. Wang, X.-P. Li, J. Li, C. Xie, J. Wang, H. Yuan, W. Wang, Z. Cheng, Z.-M. Yu, and G. Zhang, Mag- netic second-order topological insulator: an experimen- tally feasible 2d crsite3, Advanced Functional Materials 33, 2304499 (2023)

  18. [18]

    Ezawa, Magnetic second-order topological insulators and semimetals, Physical Review B 97, 155305 (2018)

    M. Ezawa, Magnetic second-order topological insulators and semimetals, Physical Review B 97, 155305 (2018)

  19. [19]

    Schindler, Z

    F. Schindler, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, A. M. Cook, A. Murani, S. Sengupta, A. Y. Kasumov, R. Deblock, S. Jeon, I. Drozdov, et al. , Higher-order topology in bis- muth, Nature physics 14, 918 (2018)

  20. [20]

    Aggarwal, P

    L. Aggarwal, P. Zhu, T. L. Hughes, and V. Madhavan, Evidence for higher order topology in bi and bi0. 92sb0. 08, Nature communications 12, 4420 (2021)

  21. [21]

    J. Lee, J. Kwon, E. Lee, J. Park, S. Cha, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M.-H. Jo, and H. Choi, Spinful hinge states in the higher-order topological insulators wte2, Nature Communications 14, 1801 (2023)

  22. [22]

    Y.-B. Choi, Y. Xie, C.-Z. Chen, J. Park, S.-B. Song, J. Yoon, B. J. Kim, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Kim, et al. , Evidence of higher-order topology in multilayer wte2 from josephson coupling through anisotropic hinge states, Nature Materials 19, 974 (2020)

  23. [23]

    Z. Wang, B. J. Wieder, J. Li, B. Yan, and B. A. Bernevig, Higher-order topology, monopole nodal lines, and the ori- gin of large fermi arcs in transition metal dichalcogenides xte2 (x= mo, w), Physical review letters 123, 186401 (2019)

  24. [24]

    Giester, C

    G. Giester, C. Lengauer, E. Tillmanns, and J. Zemann, Tl2s: Re-determination of crystal structure and stere- ochemical discussion, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 168, 322 (2002)

  25. [25]

    X. Chia, A. Ambrosi, Z. Sofer, J. Luxa, D. Sedmidubský, and M. Pumera, Anti-mos2 nanostructures: Tl2s and its electrochemical and electronic properties, ACS nano 10, 112 (2016)

  26. [26]

    Ashraf, H

    I. Ashraf, H. Elshaikh, and A. Badr, Characteristics of photoconductivity in tl2s layered single crystals, physica status solidi (b) 241, 885 (2004)

  27. [27]

    Z. Gui, W. Li, and L. Huang, Emergence of improper electronic ferroelectricity and flat band in twisted bilayer tl2s, Nano Letters 24, 3231 (2024)

  28. [28]

    W. A. Benalcazar, T. Li, and T. L. Hughes, Quantization of fractional corner charge in c n-symmetric higher-order topological crystalline insulators, Physical Review B 99, 245151 (2019)

  29. [29]

    J. Gao, Q. Wu, C. Persson, and Z. Wang, Irvsp: To ob- tain irreducible representations of electronic states in the vasp, Computer Physics Communications 261, 107760 (2021)

  30. [30]

    W. A. Benalcazar and A. Cerjan, Bound states in the continuum of higher-order topological insulators, Physi- cal Review B 101, 161116 (2020)

  31. [31]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Electric multipole moments, topological multipole mo- ment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline in- sulators, Physical Review B 96, 245115 (2017)

  32. [32]

    A. L. Barbosa, L. M. Canonico, J. H. García, and T. G. Rappoport, Orbital hall effect and topology on a two- 8 dimensional triangular lattice: From bulk to edge, Phys- ical Review B 110, 085412 (2024)

  33. [33]

    L. M. Canonico, T. P. Cysne, A. Molina-Sanchez, R. Mu- niz, and T. G. Rappoport, Orbital hall insulating phase in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Physical Review B 101, 161409 (2020)

  34. [34]

    T. P. Cysne, M. Costa, L. M. Canonico, M. B. Nardelli, R. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, Disentangling orbital and valley hall effects in bilayers of transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical review letters 126, 056601 (2021)

  35. [35]

    Topological nature of orbital chern insulators,

    Y.-T. Yao, C.-H. Chu, A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T.-R. Chang, Topological nature of orbital chern insulators, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08138 (2025)

  36. [36]

    Costa, B

    M. Costa, B. Focassio, L. M. Canonico, T. P. Cysne, G. R. Schleder, R. B. Muniz, A. Fazzio, and T. G. Rappoport, Connecting higher-order topology with the orbital hall effect in monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Review Letters 130, 116204 (2023)

  37. [37]

    J. Qiao, J. Zhou, Z. Yuan, and W. Zhao, Calculation of intrinsic spin hall conductivity by wannier interpolation, Physical Review B 98, 214402 (2018)

  38. [38]

    Shvartsman, W

    V. Shvartsman, W. Kleemann, J. Dec, Z. Xu, and S. Lu, Diffuse phase transition in bati1- xsnxo3 ceramics: An intermediate state between ferroelectric and relaxor be- havior, Journal of Applied Physics 99 (2006)

  39. [39]

    G. Long, M. Pan, H. Zeng, and H. Huang, Second-order topological insulators in two-dimensional monolayers of the 1t-phase ptse 2 material class, Physical Review Ma- terials 8, 044203 (2024)

  40. [40]

    Maragakis, S

    P. Maragakis, S. A. Andreev, Y. Brumer, D. R. Reich- man, and E. Kaxiras, Adaptive nudged elastic band ap- proach for transition state calculation, The Journal of chemical physics 117, 4651 (2002)

  41. [41]

    N. Mao, R. Li, X. Zou, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and C. Niu, Ferroelectric higher-order topological insulator in two di- mensions, Physical Review B 107, 045125 (2023)

  42. [42]

    X. Feng, R. Li, Z. Chen, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and C. Niu, Manipulating corner states without topological phase transition in two-dimensional intrinsic triferroic materi- als, Physical Review B 109, 165308 (2024)

  43. [43]

    Higashitarumizu, H

    N. Higashitarumizu, H. Kawamoto, C.-J. Lee, B.-H. Lin, F.-H. Chu, I. Yonemori, T. Nishimura, K. Wakabayashi, W.-H. Chang, and K. Nagashio, Purely in-plane ferro- electricity in monolayer sns at room temperature, Nature communications 11, 2428 (2020)

  44. [44]

    Sutter, H

    P. Sutter, H. Komsa, H. Lu, A. Gruverman, and E. Sut- ter, Few-layer tin sulfide (sns): Controlled synthesis, thickness dependent vibrational properties, and ferroelec- tricity, Nano Today 37, 101082 (2021)

  45. [45]

    K. C. Kwon, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, W. Yu, X. Wang, I.-H. Park, H. S. Choi, T. Ma, Z. Zhu, B. Tian, et al. , In- plane ferroelectric tin monosulfide and its application in a ferroelectric analog synaptic device, Acs Nano 14, 7628 (2020)

  46. [46]

    M. Orio, D. A. Pantazis, and F. Neese, Density functional theory, Photosynthesis research 102, 443 (2009)

  47. [47]

    Hafner, Ab-initio simulations of materials using vasp: Density-functional theory and beyond, Journal of com- putational chemistry 29, 2044 (2008)

    J. Hafner, Ab-initio simulations of materials using vasp: Density-functional theory and beyond, Journal of com- putational chemistry 29, 2044 (2008)

  48. [48]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for ob- taining maximally-localised wannier functions, Computer physics communications 178, 685 (2008)

  49. [49]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Wanniertools: An open-source software pack- age for novel topological materials, Computer Physics Communications 224, 405 (2018)

  50. [50]

    Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 92, 012001 (2023)

    A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 92, 012001 (2023)