Decision-Aware Attention Propagation for Vision Transformer Explainability
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:18 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Integrating gradient-based token importance into attention rollout produces more faithful and class-sensitive explanations for Vision Transformer predictions.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
By estimating token importance through gradient-based localization and integrating it into layer-wise attention rollout, the method captures both the structural flow of attention and the evidence most relevant to the final prediction. Consequently, it produces attribution maps that are more class sensitive, compact, and faithful than those generated by conventional attention-based methods.
What carries the argument
Decision-Aware Attention Propagation (DAP), which injects gradient-estimated token importance priors into the layer-wise attention rollout process.
If this is right
- Attribution maps become more class sensitive and better distinguish between different predictions.
- The maps focus more compactly on decision-relevant image regions.
- Quantitative metrics of faithfulness improve over pure attention and pure gradient baselines.
- The improvements remain consistent across Vision Transformer variants of different sizes.
- Qualitative results align more closely with the model's actual decision evidence.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Similar decision-aware weighting could be tested on other attention-based architectures such as those used in language or multimodal models.
- The method may reveal cases where attention structure alone misleads by showing when gradient signals override or reinforce rollout paths.
- It suggests a broader pattern for hybrid explanations that respect both model architecture and output sensitivity in any layered network.
Load-bearing premise
Gradient-based localization estimates give reliable token importance that can be merged directly into attention rollout without adding bias or losing the transformer's propagation structure.
What would settle it
Controlled tests on standard faithfulness benchmarks where DAP maps score equal or lower than raw attention rollout on deletion/insertion metrics, or fail to improve class discrimination in visualizations on datasets with known ground-truth regions.
Figures
read the original abstract
Vision Transformers (ViTs) have become a dominant architecture in computer vision, yet their prediction process remains difficult to interpret because information is propagated through complex interactions across layers and attention heads. Existing attention based explanation methods provide an intuitive way to trace information flow. However, they rely mainly on raw attention weights, which do not explicitly reflect the final decision and often lead to explanations with limited class discriminability. In contrast, gradient based localization methods are more effective at highlighting class specific evidence, but they do not fully exploit the hierarchical attention propagation mechanism of transformers. To address this limitation, we propose Decision-Aware Attention Propagation (DAP), an attribution method that injects decision-relevant priors into transformer attention propagation. By estimating token importance through gradient based localization and integrating it into layer wise attention rollout, the method captures both the structural flow of attention and the evidence most relevant to the final prediction. Consequently, DAP produces attribution maps that are more class sensitive, compact, and faithful than those generated by conventional attention based methods. Extensive experiments across Vision Transformer variants of different model scales show that DAP consistently outperforms existing baselines in both quantitative metrics and qualitative visualizations, indicating that decision aware propagation is an effective direction for improving ViT interpretability.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript proposes Decision-Aware Attention Propagation (DAP) as an attribution method for Vision Transformers. It estimates token importance via gradient-based localization and injects these priors into layer-wise attention rollout to generate attribution maps claimed to be more class-sensitive, compact, and faithful than those from conventional attention-based explainability techniques. The authors assert that extensive experiments on ViT variants of varying scales demonstrate consistent outperformance in quantitative metrics and qualitative visualizations.
Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, DAP would offer a useful hybrid approach that combines the decision-specificity of gradients with the structural propagation of attention rollout, potentially improving the reliability of ViT explanations in computer vision applications. The absence of machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations is noted, but the method's compositional nature could still advance the field if the integration step is rigorously validated.
major comments (2)
- [§3] §3 (Method): the decision-aware reweighting of per-layer attention matrices by gradient-derived token priors is not shown to preserve the row-stochastic or flow-semantic properties required for valid attention rollout; gradient sign flips or noise could create spurious high-importance paths that do not correspond to forward-pass evidence, directly undermining the claim that DAP remains faithful to the transformer's structural propagation.
- [§4] §4 (Experiments): the faithfulness evaluation relies on insertion/deletion metrics that are themselves gradient-sensitive, creating a circularity risk where the hybrid construction is rewarded for exactly the biases it introduces; no ablation isolating the effect of the reweighting step versus pure rollout is reported, leaving the central outperformance claim unsupported at the level of controls.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract and §3] The abstract and method description would benefit from an explicit equation defining the reweighting operation (e.g., how priors are multiplied or added into attention matrices) to clarify the precise integration.
- [Throughout] Notation for the composite attribution map could be standardized across sections to avoid ambiguity between raw attention rollout and the decision-aware variant.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the thoughtful review and constructive suggestions. Below we respond to each major comment, indicating the revisions we plan to make to address the concerns.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [§3] the decision-aware reweighting of per-layer attention matrices by gradient-derived token priors is not shown to preserve the row-stochastic or flow-semantic properties required for valid attention rollout; gradient sign flips or noise could create spurious high-importance paths that do not correspond to forward-pass evidence, directly undermining the claim that DAP remains faithful to the transformer's structural propagation.
Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not explicitly demonstrate the preservation of row-stochastic and flow-semantic properties after the decision-aware reweighting. The integration of gradient priors could potentially introduce issues with sign flips or noise leading to spurious paths. To address this, we will revise Section 3 to include a detailed description of the reweighting and normalization procedure, along with a proof sketch or empirical validation that the properties are maintained. We will also add experiments assessing the impact of gradient noise on the resulting attribution maps. This will better support the faithfulness claim. revision: yes
-
Referee: [§4] the faithfulness evaluation relies on insertion/deletion metrics that are themselves gradient-sensitive, creating a circularity risk where the hybrid construction is rewarded for exactly the biases it introduces; no ablation isolating the effect of the reweighting step versus pure rollout is reported, leaving the central outperformance claim unsupported at the level of controls.
Authors: We agree that there is a risk of circularity in using insertion/deletion metrics for evaluating a gradient-influenced method, as these metrics may favor approaches that align with gradient biases. Additionally, the lack of an ablation study isolating the reweighting effect versus pure rollout leaves the source of improvements unclear. In the revised manuscript, we will add an ablation study in Section 4 that compares the full DAP method against a version using only attention rollout without gradient reweighting. We will also discuss the limitations of the chosen faithfulness metrics and consider alternative evaluation approaches if necessary. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: compositional method with independent external components
full rationale
The paper defines DAP as the explicit composition of two pre-existing operations (gradient-based token importance from localization methods and layer-wise attention rollout) without any self-referential fitting, parameter estimation that is then renamed as a prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The derivation chain consists of (1) computing gradients for token priors, (2) injecting those priors into per-layer attention matrices, and (3) performing rollout; none of these steps mathematically reduces the final attribution map to the inputs by construction. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is invoked. The central claim of improved class sensitivity and faithfulness is an empirical assertion evaluated against external metrics, not a tautological consequence of the method definition itself.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Layer-wise attention rollout accurately captures the hierarchical flow of information in Vision Transformers.
- domain assumption Gradient-based localization yields token importance scores that are meaningfully aligned with the final class decision.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[2]
A survey on vision transformer.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 45(1):87–110, 2022
Kai Han, Yunhe Wang, Hanting Chen, Xinghao Chen, Jianyuan Guo, Zhenhua Liu, Yehui Tang, An Xiao, Chunjing Xu, Yixing Xu, et al. A survey on vision transformer.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 45(1):87–110, 2022
2022
-
[3]
Visual transformer-based models: A survey
Xiaonan Huang, Ning Bi, and Jun Tan. Visual transformer-based models: A survey. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, pages 295–305. Springer, 2022
2022
-
[4]
Explainable convolutional neural networks: A taxonomy, review, and future directions.ACM Computing Surveys, 55(10):1–37, 2023
Rami Ibrahim and M Omair Shafiq. Explainable convolutional neural networks: A taxonomy, review, and future directions.ACM Computing Surveys, 55(10):1–37, 2023
2023
-
[5]
Utilizing customized cnn for brain tumor prediction with explainable ai.Heliyon, 10(20), 2024
Md Imran Nazir, Afsana Akter, Md Anwar Hussen Wadud, and Md Ashraf Uddin. Utilizing customized cnn for brain tumor prediction with explainable ai.Heliyon, 10(20), 2024
2024
-
[6]
A survey of the vision transformers and their cnn-transformer based variants
Asifullah Khan, Zunaira Rauf, Anabia Sohail, Abdul Rehman Khan, Hifsa Asif, Aqsa Asif, and Umair Farooq. A survey of the vision transformers and their cnn-transformer based variants. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(Suppl 3):2917–2970, 2023
2023
-
[7]
Explainabil- ity of vision transformers: A comprehensive review and new perspectives.Multimedia Tools and Applications, 85(2):115, 2026
Rojina Kashefi, Leili Barekatain, Mohammad Sabokrou, and Fatemeh Aghaeipoor. Explainabil- ity of vision transformers: A comprehensive review and new perspectives.Multimedia Tools and Applications, 85(2):115, 2026
2026
-
[8]
https://arxiv.org/html/2506.21812?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Avash Palikhe, Zhenyu Yu, Zichong Wang, and Wenbin Zhang. Towards transparent ai: A survey on explainable large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21812, 2025
-
[9]
Explainable artificial intelligence (xai): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai.Information fusion, 58:82–115, 2020
Alejandro Barredo Arrieta, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier Del Ser, Adrien Bennetot, Siham Tabik, Alberto Barbado, Salvador García, Sergio Gil-López, Daniel Molina, Richard Ben- jamins, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (xai): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai.Information fusion, 58:82–115, 2020
2020
-
[10]
Explainability and evaluation of vision transformers: An in-depth experimental study.Electronics, 13(1):175, 2023
Sédrick Stassin, Valentin Corduant, Sidi Ahmed Mahmoudi, and Xavier Siebert. Explainability and evaluation of vision transformers: An in-depth experimental study.Electronics, 13(1):175, 2023
2023
-
[11]
Explainability and vision foundation models: A survey.Information Fusion, 122:103184, 2025
Rémi Kazmierczak, Eloïse Berthier, Goran Frehse, and Gianni Franchi. Explainability and vision foundation models: A survey.Information Fusion, 122:103184, 2025. ISSN 1566-2535. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103184. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S156625352500257X
-
[12]
Quantifying attention flow in transformers
Samira Abnar and Willem Zuidema. Quantifying attention flow in transformers. InProceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pages 4190–4197, 2020
2020
-
[13]
Attribution rollout: a new way to interpret visual transformer.Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(1):163–173, 2023
Li Xu, Xin Yan, Weiyue Ding, and Zechao Liu. Attribution rollout: a new way to interpret visual transformer.Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(1):163–173, 2023
2023
-
[14]
Transformer interpretability beyond attention visualization
Hila Chefer, Shir Gur, and Lior Wolf. Transformer interpretability beyond attention visualization. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 782–791, 2021
2021
-
[15]
Gmar: gradient-driven multi-head attention rollout for vision transformer interpretability
Sehyeong Jo, Gangjae Jang, and Haesol Park. Gmar: gradient-driven multi-head attention rollout for vision transformer interpretability. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pages 582–587. IEEE, 2025
2025
-
[16]
Learning deep features for discriminative localization
Bolei Zhou, Aditya Khosla, Agata Lapedriza, Aude Oliva, and Antonio Torralba. Learning deep features for discriminative localization. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2921–2929, 2016. 10
2016
-
[17]
Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization
Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. InProceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 618–626, 2017
2017
-
[18]
Grad-cam++: Generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks
Aditya Chattopadhay, Anirban Sarkar, Prantik Howlader, and Vineeth N Balasubramanian. Grad-cam++: Generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks. In2018 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV), pages 839–847. IEEE, 2018
2018
-
[19]
Class-discriminative attention maps for vision transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02364, 2023
Lennart Brocki, Jakub Binda, and Neo Christopher Chung. Class-discriminative attention maps for vision transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02364, 2023
-
[20]
Attention guided cam: visual explanations of vision transformer guided by self-attention
Saebom Leem and Hyunseok Seo. Attention guided cam: visual explanations of vision transformer guided by self-attention. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 38, pages 2956–2964, 2024
2024
-
[21]
Legrad: An explainability method for vision transformers via feature formation sensitivity
Walid Bousselham, Angie Boggust, Sofian Chaybouti, Hendrik Strobelt, and Hilde Kuehne. Legrad: An explainability method for vision transformers via feature formation sensitivity. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 20336– 20345, 2025
2025
-
[22]
Imagenet: A large- scale hierarchical image database
Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large- scale hierarchical image database. In2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248–255. Ieee, 2009
2009
-
[23]
How to train your ViT? Data, augmentation, and regularization in vision transformers
Andreas Steiner, Alexander Kolesnikov, , Xiaohua Zhai, Ross Wightman, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Lucas Beyer. How to train your vit? data, augmentation, and regularization in vision transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10270, 2021
-
[24]
Ross Wightman. Pytorch image models. https://github.com/huggingface/ pytorch-image-models, 2019. 11 Appendix A Detailed Metric Definitions This appendix provides implementation details and additional interpretation for the evaluation metrics used in the main paper. While the main text focuses on concise definitions, here we clarify how each metric is comp...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.