arxiv: 2604.18117 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 💻 cs.LG

Recognition: unknown

LoRaQ: Optimized Low Rank Approximation for 4-bit Quantization

Yann Bouquet , Alireza Khodamoradi , Sophie Y\'ang Shen , Kristof Denolf , Mathieu Salzmann

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG

keywords post-training quantizationlow-rank approximation4-bit quantizationdiffusion transformersdata-free calibrationPixart-ΣSANA

0 comments

The pith

LoRaQ optimizes low-rank branches in a data-free way so they can themselves be quantized, creating the first fully sub-16-bit pipeline for diffusion transformers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents LoRaQ as a post-training quantization method that uses optimized low-rank approximations to offset the damage from aggressive 4-bit weight and activation quantization in large diffusion transformers. Prior techniques kept the auxiliary low-rank branch at full 16-bit precision and needed data-dependent calibration; LoRaQ removes both requirements by optimizing the branch directly against quantization error without any data. The result is a complete pipeline where every component, including the compensation branch, stays at low precision. At matched memory cost this yields better generative quality than existing methods on Pixart-Σ and SANA. The work also maps out mixed-precision choices for the branch that remain fully quantized yet improve results further.

Core claim

LoRaQ performs data-free optimization of a low-rank approximation branch appended to each linear layer so that the branch compensates for 4-bit quantization error even after the branch itself is quantized to low precision. This produces the first end-to-end sub-16-bit architecture for diffusion transformers. On Pixart-Σ and SANA, the method exceeds the performance of prior low-rank compensation techniques run in their native high-precision configurations while using identical memory overhead, and it supports mixed-precision branch settings such as W8A8, W6A6, or W4A8 that remain fully quantized.

What carries the argument

Data-free optimization of a low-rank approximation branch that minimizes residual quantization error and can itself be quantized without high-precision fallback.

If this is right

Diffusion transformers can be deployed with every matrix multiplication in sub-16-bit arithmetic.
Low-rank compensation no longer requires a separate high-precision compute path.
Memory-constrained hardware can run larger models at 4-bit base precision without the usual quality collapse.
Mixed-precision schedules become possible where the main layer stays at 4 bits and the branch uses slightly higher but still quantized formats.
No calibration dataset is needed to initialize or tune the compensation branch.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same optimization could be applied to other transformer families or to lower bit-widths such as 3-bit or 2-bit if the low-rank rank is increased modestly.
Hardware that supports native low-bit matrix multiplication would gain more from this approach than from methods that still need 16-bit paths.
Because calibration data is removed, the technique may transfer more readily to on-device or privacy-sensitive settings.
Combining LoRaQ with other compression stages such as pruning or knowledge distillation could compound the memory savings.

Load-bearing premise

A low-rank approximation found without data can still correct most of the error introduced by 4-bit quantization once that same low-rank branch is also quantized.

What would settle it

Measure generative quality on Pixart-Σ or SANA when the LoRaQ branch is forced to 4-bit weights and activations versus when it is left at 16-bit; if the 4-bit version shows no improvement over plain 4-bit quantization or is clearly worse than the 16-bit version, the central claim fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18117 by Alireza Khodamoradi, Kristof Denolf, Mathieu Salzmann, Sophie Y\'ang Shen, Yann Bouquet.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Overview of the LoRaQ pipeline. A linear layer’s weight matrix W is decomposed into two parallel branches. The residual branch contains the quantized residual matrix P = W − Q2(LΩ)Q2(ΩT R), quantized with operator Q1. The low-rank branch contains the matrices L and R, which are rotated by Ω and quantized using operator Q2. We show that inserting Ω between L and R minimizes quantization error. The rotation … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Comparison of images generated by PixArt-Σ in different configurations: Full precision model (FP16), SVDQuant with MXINT4 residual branch quantization, and LoRaQ with MXINT4 residual branch and low-rank matrices quantization. FP16 SVDQuant Ours FP16 SVDQuant Ours 4.3. Mixed Precision Analysis Motivated by the growing hardware support for mixedprecision kernels (Advanced Micro Devices, 2025), we analyze v… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Comparison of images generated by PixArt-Σ across different quantization configurations (Section 4.2). Columns show the full-precision model (FP16) against SVDQuant and LoRaQ using both SINT4 and MXINT4 quantization. FP16 SVDQuant (sint4) LoRaQ (sint4) SVDQuant (mxint4) LoRaQ (mxint4) 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Visual results for different mixed-precision configurations of LoRaQ on PixArt-Σ, corresponding to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Visual results for different mixed-precision configurations of LoRaQ on PixArt-Σ, corresponding to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Visual comparison of LoRaQ on PixArt-Σ, illustrating the impact of rank on generation quality. These results correspond to the quantitative analysis in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Visual comparison of LoRaQ on PixArt-Σ, illustrating the impact of rank on generation quality. These results correspond to the quantitative analysis in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Post-training quantization (PTQ) is essential for deploying large diffusion transformers on resource-constrained hardware, but aggressive 4-bit quantization significantly degrades generative performance. Low-rank approximation methods have emerged as a promising solution by appending auxiliary linear branches to restore performance. However, current state-of-the-art approaches assume these branches must retain high precision (W16A16) and rely on heavy, data-dependent calibration for initialization. We challenge both limitations with LoRaQ (Low-Rank Approximated Quantization), a simple, data-free calibration approach that optimizes quantization error compensation. By overcoming the need for high-precision branches, LoRaQ enables the first fully sub-16 bit pipeline, allowing the low-rank branch itself to be quantized. We demonstrate that, at equal memory overhead, LoRaQ outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in their native implementations on Pixart-$\Sigma$ and SANA. We also analyze mixed-precision configurations, showing that setups such as W8A8, W6A6, and W4A8 for the low-rank branch, alongside a W4 main layer, yield superior results while maintaining a fully quantized architecture compatible with modern mixed-precision hardware.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

LoRaQ's data-free low-rank method lets the compensation branch itself go to low bits, which removes a practical barrier from prior work if the optimization actually accounts for that quantization.

read the letter

LoRaQ's main contribution is a data-free procedure that finds low-rank factors to offset 4-bit quantization error in diffusion transformers and then quantizes those factors too. This removes the high-precision W16A16 branch that earlier low-rank compensation methods kept, and it avoids data-dependent calibration for initialization. The experiments report better generative quality than native SOTA implementations on Pixart-Σ and SANA at matched memory cost, plus some mixed-precision variants for the branch (W8A8, W6A6, W4A8) that stay fully quantized and hardware-compatible. That combination targets a real deployment pain point for large models on edge devices, and the simplicity of the stated approach is a practical plus. The paper earns credit for directly addressing two stated limitations in the prior literature and for running the comparison on actual large diffusion models rather than toy cases. The soft spot is the optimization step itself. The abstract describes optimizing quantization error compensation then quantizing the branch afterward, but gives no equations or solver details. If the data-free objective minimizes error assuming full-precision A and B and only applies quantization after the solve, the final residual error is not corrected and the fully sub-16-bit claim weakens. The stress-test concern lands here because nothing in the provided text shows the quantization operator folded into the data-free objective. If the full paper demonstrates that the solver was adjusted to include Q(A)Q(B) during optimization, the result strengthens considerably; otherwise the central claim rests on an assumption that needs explicit verification. This paper is for researchers and engineers working on post-training quantization and efficient inference for generative transformers. Readers focused on practical 4-bit deployment of diffusion models will find the memory-matched comparisons and mixed-precision analysis directly useful. It deserves a serious referee because the idea fills a documented gap and the experiments are on relevant models, even though the method details require closer scrutiny in review.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces LoRaQ, a data-free post-training quantization method that uses optimized low-rank approximation to compensate for errors in 4-bit quantized weights of diffusion transformers. It claims to remove the need for high-precision (W16A16) auxiliary branches by quantizing the low-rank factors themselves, enabling the first fully sub-16-bit pipeline. Experiments on Pixart-Σ and SANA reportedly show that LoRaQ outperforms prior low-rank PTQ methods at equal memory cost, with additional analysis of mixed-precision configurations (e.g., W8A8/W6A6/W4A8 for the branch alongside W4 main weights).

Significance. If the central claim holds with rigorous evidence, the result would be significant for efficient deployment of large generative models: it removes a key practical barrier (high-precision branches and data-dependent calibration) while maintaining or improving quality at 4-bit, directly enabling hardware-friendly mixed-precision execution. The data-free nature and explicit support for quantizing the compensation branch itself would be a clear advance over existing low-rank PTQ approaches.

major comments (3)

[§3] §3 (Method), optimization objective: the description of the data-free low-rank solve (minimizing quantization error compensation) does not specify whether the objective includes the quantization operators on the auxiliary factors A and B during optimization or applies them only after the fact. If the latter, the claim that Q(W) + Q(A)Q(B) restores performance requires an explicit error analysis or bound showing that the post-quantization residual remains negligible; without this, the fully sub-16-bit pipeline claim rests on an unverified assumption.
[§4] §4 (Experiments), quantitative results: the abstract and summary claim outperformance over SOTA at equal memory overhead on Pixart-Σ and SANA, yet the provided text supplies no tables, FID/IS scores, error bars, or ablation details on the low-rank rank choice, calibration data (none), or exact bit-width configurations. These metrics are load-bearing for the central claim and must be presented with full experimental setup to allow assessment.
[§3.1–3.2] §3.1–3.2, mixed-precision analysis: the paper states that W8A8/W6A6/W4A8 branches with W4 main weights yield superior results while remaining fully quantized, but provides no derivation or ablation demonstrating that the low-rank optimization remains stable under these reduced-precision constraints on the branch; this is required to support the “first fully sub-16-bit pipeline” assertion.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the notation “Pixart-Σ” uses an unrendered LaTeX macro; ensure consistent rendering of model names throughout.
[§3] Notation: define the precise form of the low-rank factors (e.g., whether AB or A·B with specific shapes) and the quantization function Q(·) at first use in §3 to avoid ambiguity when discussing Q(A)Q(B).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify key aspects of our work. We address each major comment point-by-point below, providing clarifications from the manuscript and outlining planned revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (Method), optimization objective: the description of the data-free low-rank solve (minimizing quantization error compensation) does not specify whether the objective includes the quantization operators on the auxiliary factors A and B during optimization or applies them only after the fact. If the latter, the claim that Q(W) + Q(A)Q(B) restores performance requires an explicit error analysis or bound showing that the post-quantization residual remains negligible; without this, the fully sub-16-bit pipeline claim rests on an unverified assumption.

Authors: In LoRaQ, the low-rank factors A and B are optimized in full precision by minimizing the Frobenius norm of the residual quantization error ||W − Q(W) − AB||_F (data-free, using only the weight matrix itself). Quantization is applied to A and B only after this optimization step, enabling the fully sub-16-bit claim. We acknowledge that an explicit error bound or analysis of the post-quantization residual would strengthen the argument, particularly given the smaller dynamic range of the low-rank correction. We will revise §3 to explicitly state the optimization procedure and add a short paragraph providing either a simple bound (leveraging the fact that the low-rank factors capture only the error residual) or supporting empirical verification. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (Experiments), quantitative results: the abstract and summary claim outperformance over SOTA at equal memory overhead on Pixart-Σ and SANA, yet the provided text supplies no tables, FID/IS scores, error bars, or ablation details on the low-rank rank choice, calibration data (none), or exact bit-width configurations. These metrics are load-bearing for the central claim and must be presented with full experimental setup to allow assessment.

Authors: Section 4 of the manuscript reports FID scores, comparisons against prior low-rank PTQ methods at equal memory cost, and results on both Pixart-Σ and SANA. The data-free nature (no calibration data) and rank choices are described in the experimental setup. However, we agree that additional tables with error bars, explicit rank ablations, and tabulated bit-width configurations would improve accessibility and rigor. We will expand §4 with these details and a more complete experimental protocol in the revision. revision: partial
Referee: [§3.1–3.2] §3.1–3.2, mixed-precision analysis: the paper states that W8A8/W6A6/W4A8 branches with W4 main weights yield superior results while remaining fully quantized, but provides no derivation or ablation demonstrating that the low-rank optimization remains stable under these reduced-precision constraints on the branch; this is required to support the “first fully sub-16-bit pipeline” assertion.

Authors: We present empirical results in §3.1–3.2 demonstrating that W8A8, W6A6, and W4A8 branches paired with W4 main weights outperform baselines while keeping the entire model fully quantized. The optimization remains stable because it directly minimizes the error residual in a data-free manner and does not rely on activation statistics that would be sensitive to branch precision. To address the request for further support, we will add targeted ablations in the revision that vary branch precision and report optimization convergence behavior under these constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in LoRaQ's optimization-based derivation

full rationale

The paper describes LoRaQ as a data-free optimization procedure that minimizes quantization error via low-rank factors, followed by empirical validation on Pixart-Σ and SANA. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations are invoked in the provided text to force the result by construction. The central claim rests on the empirical performance of the optimized low-rank compensation after quantization, without reducing to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction or an ansatz smuggled via prior work. The derivation chain is self-contained and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no equations, derivations, or implementation details; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5524 in / 1139 out tokens · 33168 ms · 2026-05-10T05:30:47.019482+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Demystifying MMD GANs

URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/1801.01401. Black-Forest-Labs. Flux.1,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[2]

Chen, J., Ge, C., Xie, E., Wu, Y ., Yao, L., Ren, X., Wang, Z., Luo, P., Lu, H., and Li, Z

URL https:// blackforestlabs.ai/. Chen, J., Ge, C., Xie, E., Wu, Y ., Yao, L., Ren, X., Wang, Z., Luo, P., Lu, H., and Li, Z. Pixart-sigma: Weak-to-strong training of diffusion transformer for 4k text-to-image gen- eration. InComputer Vision – ECCV 2024: 18th Euro- pean Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part XXXII, pp. 7...

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73411-3 2024
[3]

PixArt- Σ: Weak-to-strong training of diffusion transformer for 4k text-to-image generation

URL https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73411-3_5. Chen, J., Jincheng, Y ., Chongjian, G., Yao, L., Xie, E., Wang, Z., Kwok, J., Luo, P., Lu, H., and Li, Z. Pixart- alpha: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photore- alistic text-to-image synthesis. InICLR, 2024b. Chen, L., Meng, Y ., Tang, C., Ma, X., Jiang, J., Wang, X., Wang, Z., and Zhu, W. Q-di...

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73411-3_5
[4]

LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scale

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2208.07339. Esser, P., Kulal, S., Blattmann, A., Entezari, R., M ¨uller, J., Saini, H., Levi, Y ., Lorenz, D., Sauer, A., Boesel, F., Podell, D., Dockhorn, T., English, Z., and Rombach, R. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. InProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learni...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[5]

GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibrium

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.08500. Ho, J., Jain, A., and Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion proba- bilistic models. InProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS ’20, Red Hook, NY , USA,

work page Pith review arXiv
[6]

Kingma, D

URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2412.16700. Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980,

work page arXiv
[7]

U-net: Convolu- tional networks for biomedical image segmentation

Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. U-net: Convolu- tional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W. M., and Frangi, A. F. (eds.),Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, pp. 234–241, Cham,

2015
[8]

URL https://proceedings

PMLR. URL https://proceedings. mlr.press/v37/sohl-dickstein15.html. Tang, S., Wang, X., Chen, H., Guan, C., Wu, Z., Tang, Y ., and Zhu, W. Post-training quantization with pro- gressive calibration and activation relaxing for text- to-image diffusion models. InComputer Vision – ECCV 2024: 18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024...

2024
[9]

Tseng, A., Chee, J., Sun, Q., Kuleshov, V ., and De Sa, C

URL https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-031-72992-8_23. Tseng, A., Chee, J., Sun, Q., Kuleshov, V ., and De Sa, C. Quip#: even better llm quantization with hadamard incoherence and lattice codebooks. InProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’24. JMLR.org,

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72992-8_23
[10]

cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/ 3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper

URL https://proceedings.neurips. cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/ 3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper. pdf. Wei, X., Zhang, Y ., Zhang, X., Gong, R., Zhang, S., Zhang, Q., Yu, F., and Liu, X. Outlier suppression: Pushing the limit of low-bit transformer language models,

2017
[11]

Wu, J., Wang, H., Shang, Y ., Shah, M., and Yan, Y

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13325. Wu, J., Wang, H., Shang, Y ., Shah, M., and Yan, Y . Ptq4dit: Post-training quantization for diffusion transformers. In NeurIPS,

work page arXiv
[12]

Mixdq: Memory-efficient few-step text-to-image diffusion models with metric-decoupled mixed precision quantization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17873, 2024

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17873. Zhao, T., Fang, T., Huang, H., Wan, R., Soedarmadji, W., Liu, E., Li, S., Lin, Z., Dai, G., Yan, S., Yang, H., Ning, X., and Wang, Y . Vidit-q: Efficient and accu- rate quantization of diffusion transformers for image and 10 LoRaQ: Optimized Low Rank Approximation for 4-bit Quantization video generation. InThe Thirteen...

work page arXiv
[13]

Smoothing CalibrationFollowing Li et al. (2025), the smoothing calibration, done prior to any other calibration technique, finds a per-channel vectorγ∈R b where∀i∈[0, d[: γi = maxj(|Xj,i|)α maxj(|Wi,j|)β where α and β are migration strengths (Xiao et al., 2023). The best migration strengths are decided for each layer to minimize the output mean squared er...

2025
[14]

We thus increase the rank used during the smoothing calibration proportionnaly to the rank of the low-rank matrices optimized by LoRaQ

Section 4.3.2 increases the rank for a fixed data format applied to the low-rank matrices. We thus increase the rank used during the smoothing calibration proportionnaly to the rank of the low-rank matrices optimized by LoRaQ. OptimizationWe optimize Equation 4 with Adam using a learning rate of 10−3 for FP formats and 10−4 for INT format. The optimizatio...

2025