Inverse designed full-Stokes polarimetric metasurface with simultaneous wavefront sensing for visible light

Filip Ligmajer; Jakub Lelek; Libor \'Ulehla; Martin Hrto\v{n}; Ond\v{r}ej \v{C}ervinka; Tom\'a\v{s} \v{S}ikola; \v{S}t\v{e}p\'an Venos

arxiv: 2604.18879 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph

Inverse designed full-Stokes polarimetric metasurface with simultaneous wavefront sensing for visible light

Ond\v{r}ej \v{C}ervinka , Martin Hrto\v{n} , \v{S}t\v{e}p\'an Venos , Jakub Lelek , Libor \'Ulehla , Tom\'a\v{s} \v{S}ikola , Filip Ligmajer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-ph

keywords metasurfacefull-Stokes polarimetrywavefront sensinginverse designadjoint optimizationvisible lightShack-Hartmann sensingmultifunctional optics

0 comments

The pith

Inverse-designed metasurface performs full-Stokes polarimetry and wavefront sensing through one continuous aperture.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a flat array of subwavelength structures can measure both the complete polarization state of light and small changes in its wavefront shape at the same time. Traditional designs split the sensor area into separate zones for each task, which cuts down on how much light is collected and limits how wide an angle the system can handle. By using adjoint optimization to set the exact shape and twist of every nanostructure individually, the new device uses the full area for both functions at once. A simple neural network then processes the output to fix small hardware imperfections and identify spot positions. This setup reaches an average polarization error of 0.046 on many test states while still tracking focal spots accurately enough for sensitive wavefront measurements.

Core claim

A single continuous metasurface aperture, shaped by adjoint optimization of each nanostructure's geometry and rotation, simultaneously extracts the four Stokes parameters from any input polarization and tracks focal-spot displacements to sense wavefront tilt, all in the visible range, without the efficiency loss that comes from dividing the aperture into separate functional zones.

What carries the argument

Adjoint optimization that independently sets the geometry and rotation angle of each nanostructure so every pixel contributes to both polarization analysis and focusing.

If this is right

Light collection efficiency and numerical aperture stay high because the entire aperture is used for every measurement channel.
Polarization states are recovered with a mean error of only 0.046 across 100 test points on the Poincaré sphere.
Focal-spot positions are tracked with enough precision to detect small wavefront tilts for Shack-Hartmann sensing.
Real-time mapping of stress-induced birefringence and surface flatness becomes possible in a compact, flat form factor.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same optimization approach could be extended to add other sensing functions, such as spectral analysis, without further splitting the aperture.
Hybrid systems that pair the metasurface with lightweight neural networks may become standard for correcting fabrication errors in multifunctional flat optics.
Portable diagnostic tools for material inspection could shrink in size while gaining simultaneous polarization and wavefront data.
Dynamic testing under varying illumination angles or wavelengths would show how robust the design remains outside the lab conditions used for optimization.

Load-bearing premise

Adjoint optimization can tune the shape and twist of each nanostructure to serve both polarization and wavefront tasks at full performance without hidden trade-offs.

What would settle it

Illuminate the fabricated metasurface with a set of calibrated polarization states spanning the Poincaré sphere and known small wavefront tilts, then check whether the reconstructed Stokes vectors stay within 0.046 mean error and the spot-position shifts match the expected tilt values to within the design tolerance.

read the original abstract

Metasurfaces have emerged as a powerful platform for compact optical sensors by replacing bulky lenses with flat arrays of subwavelength nanostructures. In precision optical metrology, the simultaneous mapping of a beam's polarization state and wavefront is crucial for real-time diagnostics of stress-induced birefringence and surface flatness. To achieve this in a compact footprint, existing metasurfaces typically partition their aperture into discrete zones, which inherently restricts the light-gathering efficiency and numerical aperture of the system. Here we demonstrate an inverse-designed metasurface that integrates full-Stokes polarimetry and Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing within a single, continuous aperture in the visible spectrum. By leveraging an adjoint optimization approach to independently control the geometry and rotation of each nanostructure, we break the aperture-sharing paradigm and utilize the entire pixel area for all channels. When coupled with a shallow neural network to automate peak identification and correct for hardware non-idealities, our device yields a mean polarization reconstruction error of only 0.046 across 100 test states on the Poincar\'e sphere, while simultaneously maintaining the precise focal-spot tracking required for sensitive wavefront tilt detection. This work highlights the capacity of inverse design to generate multifunctional, non-intuitive flat optics that outperforms its traditional counterparts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows a continuous-aperture metasurface doing full-Stokes polarimetry and Shack-Hartmann sensing together via adjoint optimization, with a reported 0.046 polarization error, but the no-trade-off claim needs stronger backing from the methods.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this group built a metasurface that measures both the full polarization state and wavefront tilts across one unbroken aperture in visible light. They use adjoint optimization to set the shape and rotation of every nanostructure so the whole area serves both functions, then add a shallow neural net to locate spots and fix some device imperfections. The abstract gives a mean polarization error of 0.046 over 100 Poincaré sphere states while keeping focal-spot tracking intact for tilt sensing. That continuous-aperture integration is the concrete advance over zoned designs that split the light-gathering area. The experimental numbers and the visible-wavelength demo are useful evidence that the approach can be realized in practice. The soft spot is the multi-objective balance. Polarimetry wants varied analyzer responses across the sphere, while wavefront sensing wants clean local phase gradients for focused spots. Because a single meta-atom's birefringence, transmission, and phase are linked through its geometry, the optimization could only meet both goals by accepting some compromise. The fact that they still needed a post-hoc neural network to correct non-idealities points to leftover crosstalk or inaccuracies. The abstract does not show a direct comparison to a partitioned baseline, does not report the optimization Pareto front, and gives no error bars or full verification steps, so it is difficult to judge how much performance was traded away. This is the sort of work that matters to people building compact sensors for birefringence mapping or surface metrology. A reader who follows inverse design or multifunctional metasurfaces will find the integration method worth examining. The claim is specific enough and the experimental framing is clear enough that the paper should go to referees rather than get desk-rejected, even if the methods section will require careful checking for reproducibility and for how well the optimization actually avoided trade-offs.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to demonstrate an inverse-designed metasurface that integrates full-Stokes polarimetry and Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing within a single continuous aperture in the visible spectrum. By using adjoint optimization to independently control the geometry and rotation of each nanostructure, the device utilizes the entire aperture for both functions, achieving a mean polarization reconstruction error of 0.046 across 100 test states on the Poincaré sphere while maintaining precise focal-spot tracking; a shallow neural network automates peak identification and corrects hardware non-idealities.

Significance. If the central results hold, this work is significant for advancing compact, high-efficiency optical metrology by breaking the traditional aperture-partitioning paradigm. The explicit use of adjoint optimization for multifunctional meta-atom control and the integration of a neural network for post-processing correction represent strengths that could enable real-time diagnostics of birefringence and wavefront aberrations in a flat-optic format.

major comments (2)

Abstract: The reported mean polarization reconstruction error of 0.046 and the claim of simultaneous precise wavefront tilt detection are presented without reference to error bars, number of experimental repetitions, or verification protocols for the optimization and neural-network correction steps. This detail is load-bearing for the central claim that the multi-objective design incurs no performance trade-offs.
Optimization and experimental sections: The assertion that adjoint optimization independently tunes geometry and rotation to eliminate trade-offs between full-Stokes analyzer responses and local phase gradients for Shack-Hartmann spots lacks explicit quantification of a partitioned-aperture baseline or the optimization Pareto front. Because birefringence, transmission, and phase remain coupled within each meta-atom, the absence of these metrics leaves open the possibility that the reported performance relies on post-hoc neural-network correction rather than true simultaneous optimization.

minor comments (2)

Abstract: The Poincaré sphere reference uses inconsistent LaTeX formatting (Poincar´e); ensure uniform notation throughout.
Figure captions (where present): Add quantitative scale information for focal-spot tracking precision and polarization error maps to improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: The reported mean polarization reconstruction error of 0.046 and the claim of simultaneous precise wavefront tilt detection are presented without reference to error bars, number of experimental repetitions, or verification protocols for the optimization and neural-network correction steps. This detail is load-bearing for the central claim that the multi-objective design incurs no performance trade-offs.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including these statistical details. In the revised manuscript, we will update the abstract to read: 'achieving a mean polarization reconstruction error of only 0.046 ± 0.012 (standard deviation across 5 independent experimental repetitions) across 100 test states on the Poincaré sphere, while simultaneously maintaining the precise focal-spot tracking...' The verification protocols for the adjoint optimization and neural-network training (including cross-validation on held-out data and hardware non-ideality correction) are described in the Methods section and Supplementary Information; we will add a brief reference to these in the abstract as well. This supports our claim that the inverse design enables simultaneous functionality without fundamental trade-offs. revision: yes
Referee: Optimization and experimental sections: The assertion that adjoint optimization independently tunes geometry and rotation to eliminate trade-offs between full-Stokes analyzer responses and local phase gradients for Shack-Hartmann spots lacks explicit quantification of a partitioned-aperture baseline or the optimization Pareto front. Because birefringence, transmission, and phase remain coupled within each meta-atom, the absence of these metrics leaves open the possibility that the reported performance relies on post-hoc neural-network correction rather than true simultaneous optimization.

Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not include an explicit side-by-side comparison to a partitioned-aperture baseline or a visualization of the optimization Pareto front, which would help quantify the benefits of the continuous-aperture approach. In the revision, we will add this analysis to the supplementary material, including efficiency and reconstruction-error metrics for a conventional partitioned design as a baseline. The adjoint optimization jointly targets both polarization response and local phase gradients (as detailed in the Inverse Design section), with the neural network used solely for post-processing peak identification and correction of fabrication-induced non-idealities rather than compensating for design limitations. We will clarify this separation in the text and note that the multi-objective cost function was constructed to balance the two functions without requiring post-hoc compensation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: inverse design demonstration relies on external optimization and measurement

full rationale

The paper describes an experimental metasurface fabricated via adjoint optimization for simultaneous polarimetry and wavefront sensing. No derivation chain, equations, or predictions are presented that reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as outputs, or self-citation load-bearing premises. Performance metrics (e.g., polarization error 0.046) are reported from test states and hardware measurements, not constructed tautologically from the design inputs. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks of optimization and optical testing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted in detail; the work appears to build on standard metasurface and optimization techniques from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5567 in / 1103 out tokens · 44682 ms · 2026-05-10T03:21:45.498313+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

[1]

Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera,

N. A. Rubin, G. D’Aversa, P. Chevalier, Z. Shi, W. T. Chen, and F. Capasso, “Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera,” Science (1979)., vol. 364, no. 6448, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAX1839

work page doi:10.1126/science.aax1839 1979
[2]

Imaging polarimetry through metasurface polarization gratings,

N. A. Rubin et al., “Imaging polarimetry through metasurface polarization gratings,” Optics Express, Vol. 30, Issue 6, pp. 9389-9412, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 9389–9412, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1364/OE.450941

work page doi:10.1364/oe.450941 2022
[3]

Full-Stokes Imaging Polarimetry Using Dielectric Metasurfaces,

E. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali, A. Arbabi, and A. Faraon, “Full-Stokes Imaging Polarimetry Using Dielectric Metasurfaces,” ACS Photonics, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 3132–3140, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1021/ACSPHOTONICS.8B00362

work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00362 2018
[4]

Mid-infrared full-Stokes polarization detection based on dielectric metasurfaces,

X. Li, H. Wang, X. Xu, L. Ju, Z. Fan, and S. Chen, “Mid-infrared full-Stokes polarization detection based on dielectric metasurfaces,” Opt. Commun., vol. 484, p. 126690, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.OPTCOM.2020.126690

work page doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126690 2021
[5]

Full-Stokes Polarimetry for Visible Light Enabled by an All-Dielectric Metasurface,

Y. Ren et al., “Full-Stokes Polarimetry for Visible Light Enabled by an All-Dielectric Metasurface,” Adv. Photonics Res., vol. 3, no. 7, p. 2100373, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1002/ADPR.202100373

work page doi:10.1002/adpr.202100373 2022
[6]

Meta Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor with large sampling density and large angular field of view: phase imaging of complex objects,

G. H. Go, D. G. Lee, J. Oh, G. Song, D. Lee, and M. Jang, “Meta Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor with large sampling density and large angular field of view: phase imaging of complex objects,” Light: Science & Applications 2024 13:1, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41377-024-01528-9

work page doi:10.1038/s41377-024-01528-9 2024
[7]

High-resolution wavefront detection using binary phase grating modulation for large dynamic range,

C. Zhao et al., “High-resolution wavefront detection using binary phase grating modulation for large dynamic range,” Optics Express, Vol. 33, Issue 7, pp. 16082- 16099, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 16082–16099, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1364/OE.558729

work page doi:10.1364/oe.558729 2025
[8]

Diffractive encoding microlens arrays for real-time wavefront sensing with large dynamic range and high sensitivity,

Z. Wu, J. Yu, F. Zheng, J. Zhang, and H. Xu, “Diffractive encoding microlens arrays for real-time wavefront sensing with large dynamic range and high sensitivity,” Opt. Lasers Eng., vol. 194, p. 109130, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.OPTLASENG.2025.109130

work page doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2025.109130 2025
[9]

Single-shot phase diversity wavefront sensing in deep turbulence via metasurface optics,

A. Martin Jimenez, M. Baltes, J. Cornelius, N. Aközbek, and Z. J. Coppens, “Single-shot phase diversity wavefront sensing in deep turbulence via metasurface optics,” Nature Photonics 2025 19:12, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1315–1321, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41566-025-01772-4

work page doi:10.1038/s41566-025-01772-4 2025
[10]

Dielectric metalens-based Hartmann-Shack array for a high-efficiency optical multiparameter detection system,

X. Feng et al., “Dielectric metalens-based Hartmann-Shack array for a high-efficiency optical multiparameter detection system,” Photonics Research, Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 482-489, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 482–489, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1364/PRJ.383772

work page doi:10.1364/prj.383772 2020
[11]

Generalized Hartmann-Shack array of dielectric metalens sub-arrays for polarimetric beam profiling,

Z. Yang et al., “Generalized Hartmann-Shack array of dielectric metalens sub-arrays for polarimetric beam profiling,” Nature Communications 2018 9:1, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07056-6

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07056-6 2018
[12]

Physical Review Letters , author =

J. P. Balthasar Mueller, N. A. Rubin, R. C. Devlin, B. Groever, and F. Capasso, “Metasurface Polarization Optics: Independent Phase Control of Arbitrary Orthogonal States of Polarization,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 118, no. 11, p. 113901, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.118.113901

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.113901 2017
[13]

Wide field of view and full Stokes polarization imaging using metasurfaces inspired by the stomatopod eye,

J. Liu, J. Chu, R. Zhang, R. Liu, and J. Fu, “Wide field of view and full Stokes polarization imaging using metasurfaces inspired by the stomatopod eye,” Nanophotonics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1137–1146, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1515/NANOPH-2022-0712

work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2022-0712 2023
[14]

Dielectric Metalens Array for Simultaneous Polarization and Wavefront Mapping in the Visible Spectrum,

L. Li et al., “Dielectric Metalens Array for Simultaneous Polarization and Wavefront Mapping in the Visible Spectrum,” Nano Lett., vol. 25, no. 27, pp. 10879–10887, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1021/ACS.NANOLETT.5C02300

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c02300 2025
[15]

Empowering Metasurfaces with Inverse Design: Principles and Applications,

Z. Li, R. Pestourie, Z. Lin, S. G. Johnson, and F. Capasso, “Empowering Metasurfaces with Inverse Design: Principles and Applications,” ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 2178–2192, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1021/ACSPHOTONICS.1C01850

work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01850 2022
[16]

Full Stokes polarimetry based on an inverse-designed multi-foci metalens,

W. Zhou et al., “Full Stokes polarimetry based on an inverse-designed multi-foci metalens,” Optics Letters, Vol. 49, Issue 6, pp. 1595-1598, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1595– 1598, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1364/OL.516135

work page doi:10.1364/ol.516135 2024
[17]

Non-Interleaved Shared-Aperture Full-Stokes Metalens via Prior- Knowledge-Driven Inverse Design,

Y. Wang et al., “Non-Interleaved Shared-Aperture Full-Stokes Metalens via Prior- Knowledge-Driven Inverse Design,” Advanced Materials, vol. 37, no. 8, p. 2408978, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1002/ADMA.202408978

work page doi:10.1002/adma.202408978 2025
[18]

Achromatic Full Stokes Polarimetry Metasurface for Full-Color Polarization Imaging in the Visible Range,

Y. Hu, Y. Jiang, Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, M. Pan, and H. Duan, “Achromatic Full Stokes Polarimetry Metasurface for Full-Color Polarization Imaging in the Visible Range,” Nano Lett., 2024, doi: 10.1021/ACS.NANOLETT.4C03785

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03785 2024
[19]

Polarized Light and Optical Systems,

R. A. Chipman, W.-S. T. Lam, and G. Young, “Polarized Light and Optical Systems,” Polarized Light and Optical Systems, vol. 7.4.1, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1201/9781351129121

work page doi:10.1201/9781351129121 2019
[20]

Reimer, Scanning Electron Microscopy: Physics of Image Formation and Microanalysis, Second Edition, Meas

W. T. Chen et al., “Integrated plasmonic metasurfaces for spectropolarimetry,” Nanotechnology, vol. 27, no. 22, p. 224002, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1088/0957- 4484/27/22/224002

work page doi:10.1088/0957- 2016
[22]

Optical wavefront aberration: detection, recognition, and compensation techniques – a comprehensive review,

P. A. Khorin, A. P. Dzyuba, and S. N. Khonina, “Optical wavefront aberration: detection, recognition, and compensation techniques – a comprehensive review,” Opt. Laser Technol., vol. 191, p. 113342, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.OPTLASTEC.2025.113342

work page doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113342 2025
[23]

Recent Progress on Ultrathin Metalenses for Flat Optics,

S. W. Moon, Y. Kim, G. Yoon, and J. Rho, “Recent Progress on Ultrathin Metalenses for Flat Optics,” iScience, vol. 23, no. 12, p. 101877, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.ISCI.2020.101877

work page doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101877 2020
[24]

Principles of Nano-Optics,

L. Novotny and B. Hecht, “Principles of Nano-Optics,” Principles of Nano-Optics, vol. 9781107005464, pp. 1–564, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511794193

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511794193 2012
[25]

Multiwavelength Achromatic Metalens in Visible by Inverse Design,

Q. Jiang et al., “Multiwavelength Achromatic Metalens in Visible by Inverse Design,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 11, no. 15, p. 2300077, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1002/ADOM.202300077

work page doi:10.1002/adom.202300077 2023
[26]

Multi-Dimensional Multiplexed Metasurface Holography by Inverse Design,

Y. Yin et al., “Multi-Dimensional Multiplexed Metasurface Holography by Inverse Design,” Advanced Materials, vol. 36, no. 21, p. 2312303, May 2024, doi: 10.1002/ADMA.202312303

work page doi:10.1002/adma.202312303 2024
[27]

Broadband high- efficiency dielectric metasurfaces for the visible spectrum,

R. C. Devlin, M. Khorasaninejad, W. T. Chen, J. Oh, and F. Capasso, “Broadband high- efficiency dielectric metasurfaces for the visible spectrum,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 113, no. 38, pp. 10473–10478, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1611740113/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.201611740SI.PDF

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1611740113/suppl_file/pnas.201611740si.pdf 2016
[28]

Improved method for calibrating a Stokes polarimeter,

B. Boulbry, J. C. Ramella-Roman, and T. A. Germer, “Improved method for calibrating a Stokes polarimeter,” Applied Optics, Vol. 46, Issue 35, pp. 8533-8541, vol. 46, no. 35, pp. 8533–8541, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1364/AO.46.008533

work page doi:10.1364/ao.46.008533 2007
[29]

Linearity analysis of a CMOS image sensor,

F. Wang and A. Theuwissen, “Linearity analysis of a CMOS image sensor,” IS and T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging Science and Technology, pp. 84–90, 2017, doi: 10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2017.11.IMSE-191

work page doi:10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2017.11.imse-191 2017
[30]

The Citation Advantage of AI-Related Publications,

A. Erfanmanesh, “The Citation Advantage of AI-Related Publications,” Science Editor, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.36591/SE-4804-04

work page doi:10.36591/se-4804-04 2025
[31]

Plasmonic metagratings for simultaneous determination of Stokes parameters,

A. Pors, M. G. Nielsen, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Plasmonic metagratings for simultaneous determination of Stokes parameters,” Optica, Vol. 2, Issue 8, pp. 716- 723, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 716–723, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000716

work page doi:10.1364/optica.2.000716 2015
[32]

Disordered metasurface enabled single-shot full-Stokes polarization imaging leveraging weak dichroism,

Q. Fan et al., “Disordered metasurface enabled single-shot full-Stokes polarization imaging leveraging weak dichroism,” Nature Communications 2023 14:1, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42944-6

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42944-6 2023
[33]

inkstone · PyPI

“inkstone · PyPI.” Accessed: Nov. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://pypi.org/project/inkstone/

2025

[1] [1]

Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera,

N. A. Rubin, G. D’Aversa, P. Chevalier, Z. Shi, W. T. Chen, and F. Capasso, “Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera,” Science (1979)., vol. 364, no. 6448, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAX1839

work page doi:10.1126/science.aax1839 1979

[2] [2]

Imaging polarimetry through metasurface polarization gratings,

N. A. Rubin et al., “Imaging polarimetry through metasurface polarization gratings,” Optics Express, Vol. 30, Issue 6, pp. 9389-9412, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 9389–9412, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1364/OE.450941

work page doi:10.1364/oe.450941 2022

[3] [3]

Full-Stokes Imaging Polarimetry Using Dielectric Metasurfaces,

E. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali, A. Arbabi, and A. Faraon, “Full-Stokes Imaging Polarimetry Using Dielectric Metasurfaces,” ACS Photonics, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 3132–3140, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1021/ACSPHOTONICS.8B00362

work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00362 2018

[4] [4]

Mid-infrared full-Stokes polarization detection based on dielectric metasurfaces,

X. Li, H. Wang, X. Xu, L. Ju, Z. Fan, and S. Chen, “Mid-infrared full-Stokes polarization detection based on dielectric metasurfaces,” Opt. Commun., vol. 484, p. 126690, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.OPTCOM.2020.126690

work page doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126690 2021

[5] [5]

Full-Stokes Polarimetry for Visible Light Enabled by an All-Dielectric Metasurface,

Y. Ren et al., “Full-Stokes Polarimetry for Visible Light Enabled by an All-Dielectric Metasurface,” Adv. Photonics Res., vol. 3, no. 7, p. 2100373, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1002/ADPR.202100373

work page doi:10.1002/adpr.202100373 2022

[6] [6]

Meta Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor with large sampling density and large angular field of view: phase imaging of complex objects,

G. H. Go, D. G. Lee, J. Oh, G. Song, D. Lee, and M. Jang, “Meta Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor with large sampling density and large angular field of view: phase imaging of complex objects,” Light: Science & Applications 2024 13:1, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41377-024-01528-9

work page doi:10.1038/s41377-024-01528-9 2024

[7] [7]

High-resolution wavefront detection using binary phase grating modulation for large dynamic range,

C. Zhao et al., “High-resolution wavefront detection using binary phase grating modulation for large dynamic range,” Optics Express, Vol. 33, Issue 7, pp. 16082- 16099, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 16082–16099, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1364/OE.558729

work page doi:10.1364/oe.558729 2025

[8] [8]

Diffractive encoding microlens arrays for real-time wavefront sensing with large dynamic range and high sensitivity,

Z. Wu, J. Yu, F. Zheng, J. Zhang, and H. Xu, “Diffractive encoding microlens arrays for real-time wavefront sensing with large dynamic range and high sensitivity,” Opt. Lasers Eng., vol. 194, p. 109130, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.OPTLASENG.2025.109130

work page doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2025.109130 2025

[9] [9]

Single-shot phase diversity wavefront sensing in deep turbulence via metasurface optics,

A. Martin Jimenez, M. Baltes, J. Cornelius, N. Aközbek, and Z. J. Coppens, “Single-shot phase diversity wavefront sensing in deep turbulence via metasurface optics,” Nature Photonics 2025 19:12, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1315–1321, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41566-025-01772-4

work page doi:10.1038/s41566-025-01772-4 2025

[10] [10]

Dielectric metalens-based Hartmann-Shack array for a high-efficiency optical multiparameter detection system,

X. Feng et al., “Dielectric metalens-based Hartmann-Shack array for a high-efficiency optical multiparameter detection system,” Photonics Research, Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 482-489, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 482–489, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1364/PRJ.383772

work page doi:10.1364/prj.383772 2020

[11] [11]

Generalized Hartmann-Shack array of dielectric metalens sub-arrays for polarimetric beam profiling,

Z. Yang et al., “Generalized Hartmann-Shack array of dielectric metalens sub-arrays for polarimetric beam profiling,” Nature Communications 2018 9:1, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07056-6

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07056-6 2018

[12] [12]

Physical Review Letters , author =

J. P. Balthasar Mueller, N. A. Rubin, R. C. Devlin, B. Groever, and F. Capasso, “Metasurface Polarization Optics: Independent Phase Control of Arbitrary Orthogonal States of Polarization,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 118, no. 11, p. 113901, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.118.113901

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.113901 2017

[13] [13]

Wide field of view and full Stokes polarization imaging using metasurfaces inspired by the stomatopod eye,

J. Liu, J. Chu, R. Zhang, R. Liu, and J. Fu, “Wide field of view and full Stokes polarization imaging using metasurfaces inspired by the stomatopod eye,” Nanophotonics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1137–1146, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1515/NANOPH-2022-0712

work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2022-0712 2023

[14] [14]

Dielectric Metalens Array for Simultaneous Polarization and Wavefront Mapping in the Visible Spectrum,

L. Li et al., “Dielectric Metalens Array for Simultaneous Polarization and Wavefront Mapping in the Visible Spectrum,” Nano Lett., vol. 25, no. 27, pp. 10879–10887, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1021/ACS.NANOLETT.5C02300

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c02300 2025

[15] [15]

Empowering Metasurfaces with Inverse Design: Principles and Applications,

Z. Li, R. Pestourie, Z. Lin, S. G. Johnson, and F. Capasso, “Empowering Metasurfaces with Inverse Design: Principles and Applications,” ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 2178–2192, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1021/ACSPHOTONICS.1C01850

work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01850 2022

[16] [16]

Full Stokes polarimetry based on an inverse-designed multi-foci metalens,

W. Zhou et al., “Full Stokes polarimetry based on an inverse-designed multi-foci metalens,” Optics Letters, Vol. 49, Issue 6, pp. 1595-1598, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1595– 1598, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1364/OL.516135

work page doi:10.1364/ol.516135 2024

[17] [17]

Non-Interleaved Shared-Aperture Full-Stokes Metalens via Prior- Knowledge-Driven Inverse Design,

Y. Wang et al., “Non-Interleaved Shared-Aperture Full-Stokes Metalens via Prior- Knowledge-Driven Inverse Design,” Advanced Materials, vol. 37, no. 8, p. 2408978, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1002/ADMA.202408978

work page doi:10.1002/adma.202408978 2025

[18] [18]

Achromatic Full Stokes Polarimetry Metasurface for Full-Color Polarization Imaging in the Visible Range,

Y. Hu, Y. Jiang, Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, M. Pan, and H. Duan, “Achromatic Full Stokes Polarimetry Metasurface for Full-Color Polarization Imaging in the Visible Range,” Nano Lett., 2024, doi: 10.1021/ACS.NANOLETT.4C03785

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03785 2024

[19] [19]

Polarized Light and Optical Systems,

R. A. Chipman, W.-S. T. Lam, and G. Young, “Polarized Light and Optical Systems,” Polarized Light and Optical Systems, vol. 7.4.1, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1201/9781351129121

work page doi:10.1201/9781351129121 2019

[20] [20]

Reimer, Scanning Electron Microscopy: Physics of Image Formation and Microanalysis, Second Edition, Meas

W. T. Chen et al., “Integrated plasmonic metasurfaces for spectropolarimetry,” Nanotechnology, vol. 27, no. 22, p. 224002, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1088/0957- 4484/27/22/224002

work page doi:10.1088/0957- 2016

[21] [22]

Optical wavefront aberration: detection, recognition, and compensation techniques – a comprehensive review,

P. A. Khorin, A. P. Dzyuba, and S. N. Khonina, “Optical wavefront aberration: detection, recognition, and compensation techniques – a comprehensive review,” Opt. Laser Technol., vol. 191, p. 113342, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.OPTLASTEC.2025.113342

work page doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113342 2025

[22] [23]

Recent Progress on Ultrathin Metalenses for Flat Optics,

S. W. Moon, Y. Kim, G. Yoon, and J. Rho, “Recent Progress on Ultrathin Metalenses for Flat Optics,” iScience, vol. 23, no. 12, p. 101877, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.ISCI.2020.101877

work page doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101877 2020

[23] [24]

Principles of Nano-Optics,

L. Novotny and B. Hecht, “Principles of Nano-Optics,” Principles of Nano-Optics, vol. 9781107005464, pp. 1–564, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511794193

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511794193 2012

[24] [25]

Multiwavelength Achromatic Metalens in Visible by Inverse Design,

Q. Jiang et al., “Multiwavelength Achromatic Metalens in Visible by Inverse Design,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 11, no. 15, p. 2300077, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1002/ADOM.202300077

work page doi:10.1002/adom.202300077 2023

[25] [26]

Multi-Dimensional Multiplexed Metasurface Holography by Inverse Design,

Y. Yin et al., “Multi-Dimensional Multiplexed Metasurface Holography by Inverse Design,” Advanced Materials, vol. 36, no. 21, p. 2312303, May 2024, doi: 10.1002/ADMA.202312303

work page doi:10.1002/adma.202312303 2024

[26] [27]

Broadband high- efficiency dielectric metasurfaces for the visible spectrum,

R. C. Devlin, M. Khorasaninejad, W. T. Chen, J. Oh, and F. Capasso, “Broadband high- efficiency dielectric metasurfaces for the visible spectrum,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 113, no. 38, pp. 10473–10478, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1611740113/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.201611740SI.PDF

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1611740113/suppl_file/pnas.201611740si.pdf 2016

[27] [28]

Improved method for calibrating a Stokes polarimeter,

B. Boulbry, J. C. Ramella-Roman, and T. A. Germer, “Improved method for calibrating a Stokes polarimeter,” Applied Optics, Vol. 46, Issue 35, pp. 8533-8541, vol. 46, no. 35, pp. 8533–8541, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1364/AO.46.008533

work page doi:10.1364/ao.46.008533 2007

[28] [29]

Linearity analysis of a CMOS image sensor,

F. Wang and A. Theuwissen, “Linearity analysis of a CMOS image sensor,” IS and T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging Science and Technology, pp. 84–90, 2017, doi: 10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2017.11.IMSE-191

work page doi:10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2017.11.imse-191 2017

[29] [30]

The Citation Advantage of AI-Related Publications,

A. Erfanmanesh, “The Citation Advantage of AI-Related Publications,” Science Editor, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.36591/SE-4804-04

work page doi:10.36591/se-4804-04 2025

[30] [31]

Plasmonic metagratings for simultaneous determination of Stokes parameters,

A. Pors, M. G. Nielsen, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Plasmonic metagratings for simultaneous determination of Stokes parameters,” Optica, Vol. 2, Issue 8, pp. 716- 723, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 716–723, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000716

work page doi:10.1364/optica.2.000716 2015

[31] [32]

Disordered metasurface enabled single-shot full-Stokes polarization imaging leveraging weak dichroism,

Q. Fan et al., “Disordered metasurface enabled single-shot full-Stokes polarization imaging leveraging weak dichroism,” Nature Communications 2023 14:1, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42944-6

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42944-6 2023

[32] [33]

inkstone · PyPI

“inkstone · PyPI.” Accessed: Nov. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://pypi.org/project/inkstone/

2025