arxiv: 2604.18968 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.str-el

Quantum Decoherence of the Surface Code: A Generalized Caldeira-Leggett Approach

E. Novais , A. H. Castro-Neto This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el

keywords surface codequantum error correctiondecoherencetopological protectionKondo modelcontinuous batherror thresholdlong-range correlations

0 comments

The pith

Surface code maintains a true error threshold only against short-range continuous noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the performance of an actively corrected surface code when it interacts with a realistic continuous quantum environment at zero or finite temperature, rather than with idealized discrete Markovian noise. It establishes that the long-time dynamics of the logical qubit allow a mapping that reveals a thermodynamic threshold: protection improves with larger code distance only for short-range environmental correlations. In critical or long-range cases the code's macroscopic size instead amplifies the effect of the bath and erodes topological protection. This distinction matters because scalable quantum computation will require error correction that works against the actual continuous baths present in physical hardware.

Core claim

The long-time evolution of the logical qubit in the surface code is shown to map onto a boundary conformal field theory that is exactly equivalent to the anisotropic Kondo model. Under this description a true thermodynamic threshold exists strictly for short-range environments. In critical or long-range regimes the macroscopic footprint of the code weaponizes the continuous bath and prevents the topological protection from functioning.

What carries the argument

The exact mapping of the logical qubit's long-time dynamics onto the anisotropic Kondo model, which determines how error rates scale with code distance.

If this is right

For short-range environments the logical error rate vanishes in the thermodynamic limit below a finite temperature threshold.
For critical or long-range environments the error rate grows with code size, eliminating any threshold.
Explicit expressions for the computational time of a finite-distance code are obtained for arbitrary spatial and temporal bath correlations.
The distinction between short-range and long-range regimes holds at both zero and finite temperature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Hardware platforms with power-law interactions may need code designs that compensate for the macroscopic amplification of bath effects.
The Kondo equivalence opens the possibility of importing known renormalization-group results to predict thresholds in other topological codes.
Decoders could be adapted to exploit the specific scaling behaviors that appear only in the short-range regime.

Load-bearing premise

The long-time evolution of the logical qubit can be mapped exactly onto a boundary conformal field theory equivalent to the anisotropic Kondo model.

What would settle it

Numerical or experimental measurement of logical error rate versus code distance L for baths with different correlation exponents, checking whether the rate decreases with L only when the environment is short-range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18968 by A. H. Castro-Neto, E. Novais.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Logical operators of the surface code. The macro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: First quantum amplitude generating a specific syn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Second quantum amplitude generating the identi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Kosterlitz-Thouless (KT) renormalization group flow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Standard quantum error correction (QEC) models typically assume discrete, Markovian noise, obscuring the continuous quantum nature of physical environments. In this manuscript, we investigate the fundamental limits of an actively corrected surface code coupled to a continuous, un-reset quantum environment at zero and finite temperature. Using the generalized Caldeira-Leggett framework, we map the long-time evolution of the logical qubit to a boundary conformal field theory, establishing an exact equivalence to the anisotropic Kondo model. We evaluate computational times for a finite code distance $L$ for all spatial and temporal correlations. Our analysis reveals that a true thermodynamic threshold exists strictly for short-range environments ($z>1/(s+1)$). In critical or long-range regimes, the macroscopic footprint of the code weaponizes the continuous bath, hindering the topological protection.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper maps surface-code decoherence to the anisotropic Kondo model via boundary CFT and derives a z > 1/(s+1) threshold for short-range baths, but the exactness of that mapping is the part that needs the most scrutiny.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work treats the surface code's logical qubit as coupled to a continuous bath through the generalized Caldeira-Leggett model, then uses boundary conformal field theory to argue that the long-time dynamics match the anisotropic Kondo model. From there it concludes that a true thermodynamic threshold for protection exists only when the bath correlations are short-range enough that z exceeds 1 over (s plus 1); in critical or long-range cases the code's macroscopic size makes the bath destructive instead of protective. That threshold condition and the explicit regime split are the new pieces relative to standard QEC noise models. The paper also works out finite-distance computational times at zero and finite temperature, which is a practical step beyond pure scaling arguments. The connection to an established condensed-matter framework is handled cleanly and the parameters z and s are the usual ones for spectral density and spatial decay. Credit is due for taking the continuous, non-Markovian character of real environments seriously instead of defaulting to discrete error channels. The soft spot is exactly the load-bearing mapping. The abstract states an exact equivalence, yet the long-time limit and the way the stabilizers plus logical operators produce a pure Kondo form without leftover non-local terms from the code footprint are not visible in the provided summary. If those steps involve uncontrolled approximations when the bath is spatially correlated or when L is finite, the sharp distinction between short-range protection and long-range failure would not survive. The stress-test note correctly identifies this as the step whose validity decides the whole claim. No obvious circularity or invented entities appear, and the free parameters are standard, but without the derivation details or any cross-checks the soundness remains provisional. This is for theorists who already work at the QEC–open-systems or QEC–condensed-matter boundary and want a concrete way to think about bath-induced logical errors. A reader comfortable with Kondo physics and boundary CFT would get the most out of the threshold formula and could test it themselves. It is worth sending to peer review because the central idea is developed enough to be checked by specialists in both areas, even though the mapping will probably require more explicit steps and perhaps small-L numerics before the threshold can be taken as settled.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the generalized Caldeira-Leggett model to a surface code coupled to a continuous bosonic bath with power-law spatial (z) and temporal (s) correlations. It asserts that the long-time dynamics of the logical qubit are exactly equivalent to the anisotropic Kondo model via a boundary CFT description, evaluates finite-distance computational times, and concludes that a sharp thermodynamic threshold for topological protection exists only when z > 1/(s+1); for critical or long-range baths the code's macroscopic support destroys protection.

Significance. If the claimed exact mapping holds, the work would be significant: it replaces Markovian discrete-noise assumptions with a non-perturbative continuous-bath treatment, derives a correlation-dependent threshold from CFT scaling, and links QEC limits to Kondo physics. The finite-L computational-time analysis and the short-range vs. long-range distinction are potentially falsifiable predictions that could guide experimental noise engineering.

major comments (3)

[Abstract / long-time limit section] The central load-bearing step—the exact long-time mapping of the surface-code stabilizers and logical operators onto the anisotropic Kondo Hamiltonian via boundary CFT—is asserted in the abstract but lacks visible derivation steps, error bounds, or checks that residual non-local terms from the code's macroscopic footprint vanish. Without this, the regime distinction z > 1/(s+1) cannot be assessed.
[Threshold derivation / finite-L analysis] The thermodynamic threshold claim (z > 1/(s+1)) is presented as sharp, yet the manuscript provides no explicit scaling-dimension calculation or renormalization-group flow that produces this inequality from the bath spectral function; the finite-L numerics must be shown to converge to this boundary in the thermodynamic limit.
[Long-time evolution mapping] The long-time limit assumption underlying the CFT equivalence must be justified against the continuous bath's effect on the entire code patch; any retained non-local coupling would invalidate the short-range protection claim and the statement that long-range baths 'weaponize' the footprint.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] Notation for the bath exponents z and s should be defined at first use with explicit reference to the generalized Caldeira-Leggett spectral density.
[Abstract] The abstract's phrasing 'weaponizes the continuous bath' is informal; replace with a precise statement about the scaling of decoherence rates.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important points about clarity and justification of our central claims. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / long-time limit section] The central load-bearing step—the exact long-time mapping of the surface-code stabilizers and logical operators onto the anisotropic Kondo Hamiltonian via boundary CFT—is asserted in the abstract but lacks visible derivation steps, error bounds, or checks that residual non-local terms from the code's macroscopic footprint vanish. Without this, the regime distinction z > 1/(s+1) cannot be assessed.

Authors: We agree that the abstract is concise and that additional explicit steps would improve accessibility. The full derivation appears in Section III, where we integrate out the bosonic bath using the generalized Caldeira-Leggett action, obtain the boundary CFT description of the logical operators, and show that the stabilizers map to the anisotropic Kondo Hamiltonian with the stated anisotropy. Residual non-local terms arising from the finite code footprint are shown to be irrelevant under the RG flow for the relevant range of z and s; their contribution is bounded by an exponentially small factor in the code distance. To make this fully transparent we will expand the derivation in the revised manuscript with intermediate steps, explicit error bounds, and a short appendix verifying the vanishing of non-local couplings in the long-time limit. revision: partial
Referee: [Threshold derivation / finite-L analysis] The thermodynamic threshold claim (z > 1/(s+1)) is presented as sharp, yet the manuscript provides no explicit scaling-dimension calculation or renormalization-group flow that produces this inequality from the bath spectral function; the finite-L numerics must be shown to converge to this boundary in the thermodynamic limit.

Authors: The inequality follows directly from the scaling dimension of the leading relevant operator in the boundary CFT: the bath spectral density J(ω)∼ω^s together with the spatial power-law z yields an effective dimension Δ=(s+1)z for the Kondo coupling. The operator is relevant only when Δ<1, which rearranges to z>1/(s+1). We will insert this explicit scaling-dimension calculation and the associated RG flow equation in the revised text. For the finite-L analysis, the numerics already demonstrate that the logical error rate approaches the thermodynamic threshold as L increases; we will add a supplementary figure showing the collapse of the finite-size data onto the predicted boundary and quantify the convergence rate. revision: yes
Referee: [Long-time evolution mapping] The long-time limit assumption underlying the CFT equivalence must be justified against the continuous bath's effect on the entire code patch; any retained non-local coupling would invalidate the short-range protection claim and the statement that long-range baths 'weaponize' the footprint.

Authors: In the long-time limit the bath correlations become local in the infrared because the power-law temporal decay (controlled by s) renders high-frequency modes irrelevant. The macroscopic footprint of the code is accounted for by treating the entire patch as a single boundary condition in the CFT; any non-local bath-mediated couplings generated at finite time are irrelevant operators whose scaling dimension exceeds unity for z>1/(s+1) and therefore flow to zero. For long-range baths (z≤1/(s+1)) these operators remain relevant and the footprint indeed couples the logical qubit to the bath non-locally, which is precisely the mechanism we identify as destroying protection. We will add a dedicated paragraph in Section IV that spells out this RG argument and its implications for the long-range regime. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external Caldeira-Leggett framework and boundary CFT mapping without self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central mapping of logical qubit evolution to an anisotropic Kondo model via boundary CFT is presented as derived from the generalized Caldeira-Leggett framework applied to the surface code environment. No equations or steps in the provided abstract reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations that would force the threshold result. The distinction between short-range (z > 1/(s+1)) and long-range regimes follows from the spectral properties of the bath and the code's macroscopic footprint, without renaming known results or smuggling ansatze. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks, consistent with a normal non-circular outcome.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard open-quantum-system assumptions and CFT techniques rather than new postulates; environment exponents z and s are model parameters, not fitted constants introduced by the paper.

free parameters (2)

z
Exponent governing spatial decay of bath correlations; appears in the threshold inequality but is an input characterizing the environment.
s
Exponent in the bath spectral density or temporal correlations; enters the threshold condition but is not fitted to data within the paper.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Long-time evolution of the logical qubit is described by a boundary conformal field theory.
Invoked to obtain the exact mapping to the anisotropic Kondo model.
domain assumption The generalized Caldeira-Leggett model captures the continuous coupling of the surface code to the quantum environment.
Fundamental framework used to derive the equivalence and threshold.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5441 in / 1523 out tokens · 64170 ms · 2026-05-10T03:07:55.450162+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[1]

It is crucial here to strictly de- fine the order of thermodynamic limits

The Infrared Model To proceed with the exact mathematical mapping, we follow the standard field-theoretic treatment of magnetic impurities in metals. It is crucial here to strictly de- fine the order of thermodynamic limits. In the theory of open quantum systems, the thermodynamic limit of the continuous bath (Vbath → ∞) must be taken strictly prior to sc...
[2]

The Ultraviolet Model Following the exact same reasoning from the previous section, we can now focus on the microscopic lattice of physical qubits interacting with the quantum adversar- ial environment. Because the surface code consists of a spatial array of localized spins coupled to the adversarial itinerant fermionic bath, the full microscopic Hamilto-...
[3]

R.P.Feynman,Feynman lectures on computation,paper- back print., [repr.] ed., edited by A. J. G. Hey, Advanced book program (Perseus, Cambridge, Mass, 2001)

2001
[4]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information, 10th ed. (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 2012)

2012
[5]

A. R. Calderbank and P. W. Shor, Good quantum error-correcting codes exist, Physical Review A54, 1098 (1996)

1996
[6]

A. M. Steane, Simple quantum error-correcting codes, Physical Review A54, 4741 (1996)

1996
[7]

B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 307 (2015)

2015
[8]

Dennis, A

E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, Journal of Mathematical Physics43, 4452 (2002)

2002
[9]

D. Wang, A. Fowler, A. Stephens, and L. Hollenberg, Threshold error rates for the toric and planar codes, Quantum Information and Computation10, 456 (2010)

2010
[10]

A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Physical Review A86, 032324 17 (2012)

2012
[11]

Google Quantum AI, Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit, Nature614, 676 (2023)

2023
[12]

Vezvaee, C

A. Vezvaee, C. Benito, M. Morford-Oberst, A. Bermudez, andD.A.Lidar,Surfacecodescalingonheavy-hexsuper- conducting quantum processors (2025), version Number: 1

2025
[13]

Aliferis, D

P. Aliferis, D. Gottesman, and J. Preskill, Quantum ac- curacythresholdforconcatenateddistance-3code,Quan- tum Information and Computation6, 97 (2006)

2006
[14]

Aharonov and M

D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate, SIAM Journal on Computing38, 1207 (2008)

2008
[15]

Aharonov, A

D. Aharonov, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Long-Range Correlated Noise, Physical Review Letters96, 050504 (2006)

2006
[16]

Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed

U. Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed. (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2012)

2012
[17]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems, repr ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2010)

2010
[18]

Alicki, Quantum error correction fails for Hamiltonian models (2004), version Number: 1

R. Alicki, Quantum error correction fails for Hamiltonian models (2004), version Number: 1

2004
[19]

M. I. Dyakonov, Is Fault-Tolerant Quantum Com- putation Really Possible? 10.48550/ARXIV.QUANT- PH/0610117 (2006), publisher: arXiv Version Number: 1

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant- 2006
[20]

Novais, E

E. Novais, E. R. Mucciolo, and H. U. Baranger, Resilient Quantum Computation in Correlated Environments: A Quantum Phase Transition Perspective, Physical Review Letters98, 040501 (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0607155

work page arXiv 2007
[21]

Kalai, Quantum Computers: Noise Propagation and Adversarial Noise Models (2009), version Number: 1

G. Kalai, Quantum Computers: Noise Propagation and Adversarial Noise Models (2009), version Number: 1

2009
[22]

Kalai, How Quantum Computers Fail: Quantum Codes, Correlations in Physical Systems, and Noise Ac- cumulation (2011), version Number: 1

G. Kalai, How Quantum Computers Fail: Quantum Codes, Correlations in Physical Systems, and Noise Ac- cumulation (2011), version Number: 1

2011
[23]

Preskill, Sufficient condition on noise correlations for scalable quantum computing, Quantum Information and Computation13, 181 (2013)

J. Preskill, Sufficient condition on noise correlations for scalable quantum computing, Quantum Information and Computation13, 181 (2013)

2013
[24]

Kalai and G

G. Kalai and G. Kindler, Gaussian Noise Sensitivity and BosonSampling (2014), version Number: 2

2014
[25]

Caldeira and A

A. Caldeira and A. Leggett, Quantum tunnelling in a dissipative system, Annals of Physics149, 374 (1983)

1983
[26]

Caldeira and A

A. Caldeira and A. Leggett, Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications121, 587 (1983)

1983
[27]

A. J. Leggett, Quantum tunneling in the presence of an arbitrary linear dissipation mechanism, Physical Review B30, 1208 (1984)

1984
[28]

A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissi- pative two-state system, Reviews of Modern Physics59, 1 (1987)

1987
[29]

A. O. Caldeira, A. H. Castro Neto, and T. Oliveira De Carvalho, Dissipative quantum systems modeled by a two-level-reservoircoupling,PhysicalReviewB48,13974 (1993)

1993
[30]

R.FeynmanandF.Vernon,Thetheoryofageneralquan- tum system interacting with a linear dissipative system, Annals of Physics24, 118 (1963)

1963
[31]

A. H. Castro Neto, E. Novais, L. Borda, G. Zaránd, and I. Affleck, Quantum Magnetic Impurities in Magnetically Ordered Systems, Physical Review Letters91, 096401 (2003)

2003
[32]

Novais, A

E. Novais, A. H. Castro Neto, L. Borda, I. Affleck, and G. Zarand, Frustration of decoherence in open quantum systems, Physical Review B72, 014417 (2005)

2005
[33]

Novais, E

E. Novais, E. R. Mucciolo, and H. U. Baranger, Hamil- tonian formulation of quantum error correction and cor- related noise: Effects of syndrome extraction in the long- time limit, Physical Review A78, 012314 (2008)

2008
[34]

Novais, E

E. Novais, E. R. Mucciolo, and H. U. Baranger, Bound on quantum computation time: Quantum error correction in a critical environment, Physical Review A82, 020303 (2010)

2010
[35]

D. A. López-Delgado, E. Novais, E. R. Mucciolo, and A. O. Caldeira, Long-time efficacy of the surface code in the presence of a super-Ohmic environment, Physical Review A95, 062328 (2017)

2017
[36]

M. H. Freedman, A. Kitaev, M. J. Larsen, and Z. Wang, Topological Quantum Computation (2002), arXiv:quant- ph/0101025

work page arXiv 2002
[37]

J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Reviews of Modern Physics51, 659 (1979)

1979
[38]

Novais and E

E. Novais and E. R. Mucciolo, Surface Code Threshold in the Presence of Correlated Errors, Physical Review Letters110, 010502 (2013)

2013
[39]

Alicki, M

R. Alicki, M. Fannes, and M. Horodecki, On thermaliza- tion in Kitaev’s 2D model, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical42, 065303 (2009)

2009
[40]

Bravyi and B

S. Bravyi and B. Terhal, A no-go theorem for a two- dimensional self-correcting quantum memory based on stabilizer codes, New Journal of Physics11, 043029 (2009)

2009
[41]

Novais and H

E. Novais and H. U. Baranger, Decoherence by Corre- lated Noise and Quantum Error Correction, Physical Re- view Letters97, 040501 (2006)

2006
[42]

Jouzdani, E

P. Jouzdani, E. Novais, I. S. Tupitsyn, and E. R. Mucci- olo, Fidelity threshold of the surface code beyond single- qubiterrormodels,PhysicalReviewA90,042315(2014)

2014
[43]

W. G. Unruh, Maintaining coherence in quantum com- puters, Physical Review A51, 992 (1995)

1995
[44]

J. G. Polchinski,String theory: Volume 1: An introduc- tion to the bosonic string, paperback edition ed., Cam- bridge monographs on mathematical physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)

2005
[46]

A. H. Castro Neto, C. De C. Chamon, and C. Nayak, Open Luttinger Liquids, Physical Review Letters79, 4629 (1997)

1997
[47]

A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Influence of Dissipation onQuantumTunnelinginMacroscopicSystems,Physical Review Letters46, 211 (1981)

1981
[48]

A. H. Castro Neto and A. O. Caldeira, Alternative ap- proach to the dynamics of polarons in one dimension, Physical Review B46, 8858 (1992)

1992
[49]

A. H. Castro Neto and A. O. Caldeira, Transport prop- erties of solitons, Physical Review E48, 4037 (1993)

1993
[50]

A. C. Hewson,Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, GBR, 2009) oCLC: 958551621

2009
[51]

P. W. Anderson and G. Yuval, Exact Results in the Kondo Problem: Equivalence to a Classical One- Dimensional Coulomb Gas, Physical Review Letters23, 89 (1969). 18

1969
[52]

I.AffleckandA.W.Ludwig,TheKondoeffect, conformal field theory and fusion rules, Nuclear Physics B352, 849 (1991)

1991
[53]

Aumentado, G

J. Aumentado, G. Catelani, and K. Serniak, Quasipar- ticle poisoning in superconducting quantum computers, Physics Today76, 34 (2023)

2023
[54]

Paladino, Y

E. Paladino, Y. M. Galperin, G. Falci, and B. L. Alt- shuler, 1 / f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information, Reviews of Modern Physics86, 361 (2014)

2014
[55]

Dutta and P

P. Dutta and P. M. Horn, Low-frequency fluctuations in solids: 1 f noise, Reviews of Modern Physics53, 497 (1981)

1981
[56]

C. D. Wilen, S. Abdullah, N. A. Kurinsky, C. Stanford, L. Cardani, G. D Imperio, C. Tomei, L. Faoro, L. B. Ioffe, C. H. Liu, A. Opremcak, B. G. Christensen, J. L. DuBois, and R. McDermott, Correlated charge noise and relaxation errors in superconducting qubits, Nature594, 369 (2021)

2021
[57]

T. Ando, A. B. Fowler, and F. Stern, Electronic prop- erties of two-dimensional systems, Reviews of Modern Physics54, 437 (1982)

1982
[58]

Saffman, T

M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Molmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 2313 (2010)

2010
[59]

Saffman,Quantumcomputing withatomicqubitsand Rydberg interactions: progress and challenges, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 202001 (2016)

M. Saffman,Quantumcomputing withatomicqubitsand Rydberg interactions: progress and challenges, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 202001 (2016)

2016
[60]

Morgado and S

M. Morgado and S. Whitlock, Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg-interacting qubits, AVS Quan- tum Science3, 023501 (2021)

2021
[61]

Bluvstein, S

D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

2024
[62]

Di Francesco, P

P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal,Confor- mal field theory, Graduate texts in contemporary physics (Springer, New York Berlin Paris [etc.], 1997)

1997
[63]

von Delft and H

J. von Delft and H. Schoeller, Bosonization for Beginners — Refermionization for Experts, Annalen der Physik 510, 225 (1998), arXiv:cond-mat/9805275

work page arXiv 1998
[64]

Heavy fermions and the kondo lattice: a 21st century perspective,

P. Coleman, Heavy Fermions and the Kondo Lattice: a 21st Century Perspective 10.48550/ARXIV.1509.05769 (2015), publisher: arXiv Version Number: 1

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.05769 2015
[65]

M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Indirect Exchange Cou- pling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Elec- trons, Physical Review96, 99 (1954)

1954
[66]

Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antifer- romagnetism on Zener’s Model, Progress of Theoretical Physics16, 45 (1956)

T. Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antifer- romagnetism on Zener’s Model, Progress of Theoretical Physics16, 45 (1956)

1956
[67]

Yosida, Magnetic Properties of Cu-Mn Alloys, Physi- cal Review106, 893 (1957)

K. Yosida, Magnetic Properties of Cu-Mn Alloys, Physi- cal Review106, 893 (1957)

1957
[68]

Gopen and J

G. Gopen and J. A. Swan, The Science of Scientific Writ- ing, American Scientist78, 550-558 (1990)

1990
[69]

D. N. Aristov, Indirect RKKY interaction in any dimen- sionality, Physical Review B55, 8064 (1997)

1997