pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19173 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · quant-ph

Why Does Classical Turbulence Obey an Area Law?

Wael Itani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn quant-ph
keywords turbulencearea lawwavefunction zerosMigdal lawstochastic Navier-Stokesopen quantum systemsMadelung transformcirculation statistics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Wavefunction zeros carry quantized circulation whose codimension-2 topology produces the Migdal area law for turbulent circulation statistics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a stochastic Navier-Stokes equation from an open quantum treatment of the Schrödinger equation using Lindblad operators and quantum state diffusion. In this description the zeros of the wavefunction possess quantized circulation. Under a Poisson assumption on the zeros, their codimension-2 topology directly implies that circulation around any loop scales with the enclosed area, recovering the Migdal law through a mechanism different from loop-functional saddle points. The result is verified numerically even when the de Broglie wavelength exceeds the Kolmogorov scale. A reader would care because the area law then emerges as a geometric consequence of quantum topology rather than a separate phenomenological input.

Core claim

The Madelung transform of the norm-preserving stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equation obtained from the Lindblad unraveling produces an incompressible stochastic Navier-Stokes equation whose viscosity is fixed by the mean free path. The zeros of this wavefunction carry quantized circulation; their codimension-2 topology, combined with the Poisson assumption, yields the Migdal area law for the statistics of circulation around arbitrary loops. This holds at the ensemble level and is confirmed by direct numerical sampling of the zeros even in the regime where quantum length scales exceed classical dissipation scales.

What carries the argument

The codimension-2 zeros of the wavefunction, which carry quantized circulation and obey Poisson statistics in the stochastic Madelung fluid.

If this is right

  • Circulation statistics in incompressible turbulence are fixed by the topological properties of quantum wavefunction zeros rather than by classical loop functionals.
  • The area law remains valid when the de Broglie length exceeds the Kolmogorov scale.
  • Viscosity and stochastic forcing arise from the same Lindblad operators and automatically satisfy the fluctuation-dissipation relation.
  • The viscous Navier-Stokes equation emerges at the ensemble level from the open quantum dynamics without separate phenomenological additions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same topological mechanism could be examined in superfluid or Bose-Einstein condensate turbulence where wavefunction zeros are directly observable.
  • If the Poisson assumption is relaxed to other point processes, the circulation moments would acquire different area dependence, offering a testable signature.
  • The ensemble-level equivalence suggests that single-trajectory experiments in quantum fluids may reveal deviations from classical area-law behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The wavefunction zeros must be Poisson distributed and the viscous identification must hold at the ensemble level via the vortex decomposition.

What would settle it

A direct numerical count of wavefunction zeros that deviates from Poisson statistics, followed by computation of circulation moments that then fail to obey area scaling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19173 by Wael Itani.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Circulation variance ⟨Γ 2 ⟩ vs. normalised loop size ℓ/L. Simulation: 2D, N = 64, ∆t = 5.6 × 10−5 , Ntraj = 500, ν∗ = 0.387 (Reλ ≈ 10), Knq ≳ 1. Circulation computed around square loops of side ℓ = 1, 2, . . . , N/2 grid spacings. The ℓ 2 area law (dashed line, slope = 2) holds over nearly two decades. Both initial conditions collapse onto the same curve. The fitted exponent 1.87 is consistent with the the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Normalised circulation PDF for all combinations of initial condition and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In incompressible flow the viscous force is solenoidal, whereas the Madelung transform of a spinless Schr\"odinger equation produces only gradient forces. The two are orthogonal, so viscosity cannot arise from Hamiltonian quantum mechanics alone; an open quantum treatment is required. Reducing the $N$-body density matrix to its one-body component and closing the dynamics via Born-Markov yields Lindblad jump operators with $k^2$ scattering rates, which we unravel via quantum state diffusion (QSD) into a norm-preserving stochastic nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation. Dissipation and stochastic forcing are not separate ingredients: both come from the same Lindblad operators, and their amplitudes are locked by the QSD structure. The Madelung transform of this equation, under incompressibility, gives a stochastic Navier-Stokes equation whose viscosity is set by the mean free path and whose noise correlator satisfies the fluctuation-dissipation relation by construction, in agreement with the Landau-Lifshitz framework. The recovery is conditional: the viscous identification holds at the ensemble level via the vortex decomposition of the velocity field; the single-trajectory identification remains open. The zeros of the wavefunction carry quantised circulation; their codimension-2 topology yields the Migdal area law for circulation statistics under a Poisson assumption, here through a different mechanism than the loop-functional saddle point and verified numerically even in the quantum regime where the de~Broglie length exceeds the Kolmogorov scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that viscosity in incompressible flow cannot arise from closed Hamiltonian quantum mechanics because the Madelung transform yields only gradient forces while the viscous term is solenoidal. It derives an open-system stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equation from a Born-Markov reduction of the N-body density matrix to a Lindblad master equation with k² scattering rates, unraveled via quantum state diffusion. The Madelung transform of this equation, under incompressibility, produces a stochastic Navier-Stokes equation whose viscosity is set by the mean free path and whose noise satisfies the fluctuation-dissipation relation by construction. The zeros of the wavefunction carry quantized circulation; their codimension-2 topology is asserted to yield the Migdal area law for circulation statistics under an auxiliary Poisson assumption on the zeros, via a mechanism distinct from the loop-functional saddle point, with numerical support even when the de Broglie length exceeds the Kolmogorov scale.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work would be significant for providing a quantum open-system route to the stochastic Navier-Stokes equation consistent with the Landau-Lifshitz framework and for offering a topological mechanism, based on wavefunction zeros, that reproduces the Migdal area law. The numerical verification in the quantum regime is a concrete strength. The approach links open quantum dynamics directly to classical turbulence statistics without separate ad-hoc forcing terms.

major comments (2)
  1. [Area-law derivation from wavefunction zeros] The derivation of the Migdal area law from the codimension-2 topology of wavefunction zeros (stated in the abstract and the corresponding section) requires the Poisson assumption on the distribution of zeros as an external input. This assumption is not derived from the Lindblad operators, the QSD unraveling, or the incompressibility constraint, yet it is load-bearing: without Poisson statistics the topological counting argument does not produce the area-law exponent. If the zeros exhibit correlations induced by the k² scattering rates or the divergence-free condition, the claimed statistics do not follow.
  2. [Madelung transform and stochastic NS recovery] The viscous identification in the stochastic Navier-Stokes equation is explicitly conditional on holding at the ensemble level via vortex decomposition (abstract). The single-trajectory identification is left open. Because the numerical verification of the area law is performed in the quantum regime on individual realizations, the conditional status of the viscous term directly affects the applicability of the derived circulation statistics.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the fluctuation-dissipation relation holds 'by construction' from the Lindblad/QSD structure; an explicit statement of the noise correlator in terms of the jump operators would clarify this claim.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a brief discussion of how the mean-free-path parameter is fixed or calibrated against known turbulent limits (e.g., Reynolds-number dependence).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The derivation of the Migdal area law from the codimension-2 topology of wavefunction zeros (stated in the abstract and the corresponding section) requires the Poisson assumption on the distribution of zeros as an external input. This assumption is not derived from the Lindblad operators, the QSD unraveling, or the incompressibility constraint, yet it is load-bearing: without Poisson statistics the topological counting argument does not produce the area-law exponent. If the zeros exhibit correlations induced by the k² scattering rates or the divergence-free condition, the claimed statistics do not follow.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the Poisson assumption is an auxiliary input not derived from the Lindblad operators or QSD in this work. It is motivated by the properties of zeros in complex Gaussian random fields, which are known to be Poisson in the appropriate limit, and our simulations confirm the area law holds. We will revise the manuscript to more explicitly discuss this assumption, its justification from the literature, and the potential impact of correlations, while noting that deriving the statistics directly from the open quantum dynamics is beyond the current scope but consistent with the numerical results. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The viscous identification in the stochastic Navier-Stokes equation is explicitly conditional on holding at the ensemble level via vortex decomposition (abstract). The single-trajectory identification is left open. Because the numerical verification of the area law is performed in the quantum regime on individual realizations, the conditional status of the viscous term directly affects the applicability of the derived circulation statistics.

    Authors: The manuscript already emphasizes the conditional nature of the viscous recovery at the ensemble level. The area-law verification uses the topological properties of zeros on individual trajectories, which carry quantized circulation regardless of the ensemble averaging. The circulation statistics to which the area law applies are ensemble quantities, but the mechanism is topological and applies per realization. We will add clarification in the revised version to explain why the single-trajectory topology supports the statistics even when the viscous term is identified ensemble-wise, and discuss the quantum regime implications. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Full derivation of Poisson statistics for wavefunction zeros from the specific Lindblad operators and incompressibility constraint.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows from explicit structure and stated assumptions

full rationale

The paper derives the stochastic Navier-Stokes equation from the Lindblad master equation via QSD, with the fluctuation-dissipation relation holding by construction from the open-system operators (independent of target statistics). Viscosity is set by the mean-free-path scale arising from the k² scattering rates. The Migdal area law is obtained from the codimension-2 topology of wavefunction zeros only under an explicitly stated Poisson assumption on their statistics; the paper does not claim to derive the Poisson property from the dynamics. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or unverified self-citation chain. The conditional status of the viscous identification is openly noted. The chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Born-Markov closure, incompressibility, Poisson statistics of zeros, and ensemble-level vortex decomposition; no free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract, but mean free path appears as a scale-setting quantity.

free parameters (1)
  • mean free path
    Sets the value of viscosity in the recovered stochastic Navier-Stokes equation; its origin is not derived from first principles within the abstract.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Born-Markov approximation for reducing N-body density matrix to one-body component
    Invoked to close the dynamics and obtain Lindblad operators with k² scattering rates.
  • domain assumption Incompressibility of the flow
    Required for the Madelung transform to produce the stochastic Navier-Stokes equation.
  • ad hoc to paper Poisson distribution of wavefunction zeros
    Assumed to obtain the exponential area-law decay for circulation statistics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5552 in / 1675 out tokens · 29318 ms · 2026-05-10T02:21:36.292338+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. A. Migdal. Loop equation and area law in turbulence.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 9:1197–1238, 1994

    1994

  2. [2]

    Madelung

    E. Madelung. Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form.Z. Phys., 40:322–326, 1927

    1927

  3. [3]

    D. Bohm. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. I.Phys. Rev., 85:166–179, 1952

    1952

  4. [4]

    D. Bohm. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. II.Phys. Rev., 85:180–193, 1952

    1952

  5. [5]

    S. Sonego. Interpretation of the hydrodynamical formalism of quantum mechanics. Found. Phys., 21:1135–1181, 1991

    1991

  6. [6]

    A. A. Migdal. Universal area law in turbulence, 2019. arXiv:1903.08613

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    A. A. Migdal. Quantum solution of classical turbulence: Decaying energy spectrum. Phys. Fluids, 36:095161, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    A. A. Migdal. Duality of Navier–Stokes to a one-dimensional system, 2024. arXiv:2411.01389

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    R. E. Wyatt.Quantum Dynamics with Trajectories—Introduction to Quantum Hydro- dynamics. Springer, 2005

    2005

  10. [10]

    Takabayasi

    T. Takabayasi. On the formulation of quantum mechanics associated with classical pictures.Prog. Theor. Phys., 8:143–182, 1952

    1952

  11. [11]

    Sch¨ onberg

    M. Sch¨ onberg. On the hydrodynamical model of the quantum mechanics.Nuovo Cimento, 12:103–133, 1954

    1954

  12. [12]

    E. Nelson. Derivation of the Schr¨ odinger equation from Newtonian mechanics.Phys. Rev., 150:1079–1085, 1966

    1966

  13. [13]

    Nelson.Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion

    E. Nelson.Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion. Princeton University Press, 1967

    1967

  14. [14]

    Nelson.Quantum Fluctuations

    E. Nelson.Quantum Fluctuations. Princeton University Press, 1985

    1985

  15. [15]

    K. Yasue. Stochastic calculus of variations.J. Funct. Anal., 41:327–340, 1981

    1981

  16. [16]

    Guerra and L

    F. Guerra and L. M. Morato. Quantization of dynamical systems and stochastic control theory.Phys. Rev. D, 27:1774–1786, 1983

    1983

  17. [17]

    T. C. Wallstrom. On the derivation of the Schr¨ odinger equation from stochastic me- chanics.Found. Phys. Lett., 2:113–126, 1989

    1989

  18. [18]

    Salasnich, S

    L. Salasnich, S. Succi, and A. Tiribocchi. Quantum wave representation of dissipative fluids.Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 35:2450100, 2024. arXiv:2308.05879. 39

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Meng and Y

    Z. Meng and Y. Yang. Quantum computing of fluid dynamics using the hydrodynamic Schr¨ odinger equation.Phys. Rev. Research, 5:033182, 2023

    2023

  20. [20]

    Meng and Y

    Z. Meng and Y. Yang. Quantum spin representation for the Navier–Stokes equation. Phys. Rev. Research, 6:043130, 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    J. Yepez. Quantum lattice-gas model for computational fluid dynamics.Phys. Rev. E, 63:046702, 2001

    2001

  22. [22]

    F. Gaitan. Finding flows of a Navier–Stokes fluid through quantum computing.npj Quantum Inf., 6:61, 2020

    2020

  23. [23]

    X. Li, X. Yin, N. Wiebe, J. Chun, G. K. Schenter, M. S. Cheung, and J. M¨ ulmenst¨ adt. Potential quantum advantage for simulation of fluid dynamics.Phys. Rev. Research, 7:013036, 2025. arXiv:2303.16550

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Sanavio and S

    C. Sanavio and S. Succi. Quantum computing for simulation of fluid dynamics. In Quantum Information Science – Recent Advances and Computational Science Appli- cations. IntechOpen, 2024. arXiv:2404.01302

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Itani, K

    W. Itani, K. R. Sreenivasan, and S. Succi. Quantum algorithm for lattice Boltzmann (QALB) simulation of incompressible fluids with a nonlinear collision term.Phys. Fluids, 36:017112, 2024

    2024

  26. [26]

    W. A. Itani. Fluid dynamicists need to add quantum mechanics into their toolbox,

  27. [27]

    Preprint, hal-03129398

  28. [28]

    Succi, W

    S. Succi, W. Itani, K. Sreenivasan, and R. Steijl. Quantum computing for fluids: Where do we stand?EPL (Europhysics Letters), 144:10001, 2023

    2023

  29. [29]

    C. Zhu, Z. Wang, S. Xiong, Y. Zhao, and Y. Yang. Quantum implicit representation of vortex filaments in turbulence.J. Fluid Mech., 1014:A31, 2025

    2025

  30. [30]

    Doebner and G

    H.-D. Doebner and G. A. Goldin. On a general nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation admit- ting diffusion currents.Phys. Lett. A, 162:397–401, 1992

    1992

  31. [31]

    G. S. Krishnaswami, S. S. Phatak, S. Sachdev, and A. Thyagaraja. Nonlinear dispersive regularization of inviscid gas dynamics.AIP Advances, 10:025303, 2020

    2020

  32. [32]

    Heifetz and E

    E. Heifetz and E. Cohen. Toward a thermo-hydrodynamic like description of Schr¨ odinger equation via the Madelung formulation and Fisher information.Found. Phys., 45:1514–1525, 2015

    2015

  33. [33]

    Reddiger

    M. Reddiger. The Madelung picture as a foundation of geometric quantum theory. Found. Phys., 47:1317–1367, 2017

    2017

  34. [34]

    A. L. Sorokin. Madelung transformation for vortex flows of a perfect liquid.Dokl. Phys., 46:576–578, 2001. 40

    2001

  35. [35]

    von K´ arm´ an and L

    T. von K´ arm´ an and L. Howarth. On the statistical theory of isotropic turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 164:192–215, 1938

    1938

  36. [36]

    A. N. Kolmogorov. Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence.Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 32:16–18, 1941

    1941

  37. [37]

    A. N. Kolmogorov. The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers.Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 30:301–305, 1941

    1941

  38. [38]

    G. K. Batchelor.The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press, 1953

    1953

  39. [39]

    A. S. Monin and A. M. Yaglom.Statistical Fluid Mechanics, Vol. II. MIT Press, 1975

    1975

  40. [40]

    Freitas, L

    A. Freitas, L. Biferale, M. Desbrun, G. L. Eyink, A. A. Mailybaev, and K. Um. On the importance of stochasticity in closures of turbulence.Preprint, 2026. arXiv:2602.19875

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    G. K. Batchelor.An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 1967

    1967

  42. [42]

    A. J. Chorin and J. E. Marsden.A Mathematical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Springer, 3rd edition, 1993

    1993

  43. [43]

    Temam.Navier–Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis

    R. Temam.Navier–Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis. AMS Chelsea Publishing, 2001

    2001

  44. [44]

    S. B. Pope.Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, 2000

    2000

  45. [45]

    G. I. Taylor. Statistical theory of turbulence, Parts I–IV.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 151:421–478, 1935

    1935

  46. [46]

    Khesin, G

    B. Khesin, G. Misiolek, and K. Modin. Geometry of the Madelung transform.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 234:549–573, 2019

    2019

  47. [47]

    K. R. Sreenivasan. On the universality of the Kolmogorov constant.Phys. Fluids, 7:2778–2784, 1995

    1995

  48. [48]

    Frisch.Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N

    U. Frisch.Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press, 1995

    1995

  49. [49]

    Burattini, P

    P. Burattini, P. Lavoie, A. Agrawal, L. Djenidi, and R. A. Antonia. Approach to the 4/5 law in homogeneous isotropic turbulence.J. Fluid Mech., 550:175–184, 2006

    2006

  50. [50]

    L. Onsager. The distribution of energy in turbulence.Phys. Rev., 68:286, 1945

    1945

  51. [51]

    L. Onsager. Statistical hydrodynamics.Nuovo Cimento Suppl., 6:279–287, 1949

    1949

  52. [52]

    G. L. Eyink and K. R. Sreenivasan. Onsager and the theory of hydrodynamic turbu- lence.Rev. Mod. Phys., 78:87–135, 2006

    2006

  53. [53]

    G. L. Eyink. Onsager’s ‘ideal turbulence’ theory.J. Fluid Mech., 988:P1, 2024. 41

    2024

  54. [54]

    A. N. Kolmogorov. A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence.J. Fluid Mech., 13:82–85, 1962

    1962

  55. [55]

    She and E

    Z.-S. She and E. Leveque. Universal scaling laws in fully developed turbulence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 72:336–339, 1994

    1994

  56. [56]

    K. R. Sreenivasan and R. A. Antonia. The phenomenology of small-scale turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 29:435–472, 1997

    1997

  57. [57]

    P. G. Saffman.Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 1992

    1992

  58. [58]

    M. J. Lighthill. Introduction: Boundary layer theory. In L. Rosenhead, editor,Laminar Boundary Layers, chapter 2, pages 46–113. Oxford University Press, 1963

    1963

  59. [59]

    Guillemin and A

    V. Guillemin and A. Pollack.Differential Topology. Prentice-Hall, 1974

    1974

  60. [60]

    E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii.Physical Kinetics. Pergamon Press, 1981

    1981

  61. [61]

    T. C. Wallstrom. Inequivalence between the Schr¨ odinger equation and the Madelung hydrodynamic equations.Phys. Rev. A, 49:1613–1617, 1994

    1994

  62. [62]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari.Bose–Einstein Condensation. Oxford University Press, 2003

    2003

  63. [63]

    Nakajima

    S. Nakajima. On quantum theory of transport phenomena: Steady diffusion.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 20:948–959, 1958

    1958

  64. [64]

    R. Zwanzig. Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility.J. Chem. Phys., 33:1338– 1341, 1960

    1960

  65. [65]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione.The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, 2002

    2002

  66. [66]

    Feshbach

    H. Feshbach. Unified theory of nuclear reactions.Ann. Phys., 5:357–390, 1958

    1958

  67. [67]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka.Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems. McGraw- Hill, 1971

    1971

  68. [68]

    C. W. Gardiner.Stochastic Methods. Springer, 4th edition, 2009

    2009

  69. [69]

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller.Quantum Noise. Springer, 3rd edition, 2004

    2004

  70. [70]

    P. K. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets. Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:111601, 2005

    2005

  71. [71]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan. Completely positive dynamical semigroups ofn-level systems.J. Math. Phys., 17:821–825, 1976

    1976

  72. [72]

    Lindblad

    G. Lindblad. On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups.Commun. Math. Phys., 48:119–130, 1976. 42

    1976

  73. [73]

    G. B. Apolin´ ario, L. Moriconi, R. M. Pereira, and V. J. Valad ao. Vortex gas modeling of turbulent circulation statistics.Phys. Rev. E, 102:041102, 2020

    2020

  74. [74]

    Moriconi and R

    L. Moriconi and R. M. Pereira. Circulation fluctuations of elementary turbulent vor- tices, 2025. arXiv:2508.13958

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    K. P. Iyer, K. R. Sreenivasan, and P. K. Yeung. Circulation in high Reynolds number isotropic turbulence is a bifractal.Phys. Rev. X, 9:041006, 2019

    2019

  76. [76]

    K. P. Iyer, K. R. Sreenivasan, and P. K. Yeung. Scaling exponents saturate in three- dimensional isotropic turbulence.Phys. Rev. Fluids, 5:054605, 2020

    2020

  77. [77]

    Gisin and I

    N. Gisin and I. C. Percival. The quantum-state diffusion model applied to open sys- tems.J. Phys. A, 25:5677–5691, 1992

    1992

  78. [78]

    I. C. Percival.Quantum State Diffusion. Cambridge University Press, 1998

    1998

  79. [79]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn.Quantum Measurement and Control. Cambridge University Press, 2009

    2009

  80. [80]

    Klainerman and A

    S. Klainerman and A. Majda. Singular limits of quasilinear hyperbolic systems with large parameters and the incompressible limit of compressible fluids.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 34:481–524, 1981

    1981

Showing first 80 references.