pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19519 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

Operando Characterization of Volume Changes in Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes during Cycling using Isotope Multilayers

Erwin Hueger , Daniel Uxa , Lars Doerrer , Jochen Stahn , Harald Schmidt
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords operando neutron reflectometryvolume expansionlithium-ion batterygermanium electrodeisotope multilayeramorphous germaniumBragg peak
0
0 comments X

The pith

Isotope multilayer films let neutron reflectometry track lithium-induced volume expansion in germanium electrodes in real time.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a method that stacks layers of natural germanium and germanium-73 to create a periodic structure inside the battery electrode. This structure generates a distinct Bragg peak in the neutron reflectivity signal whose position shifts directly with the swelling or shrinking of the active material. Because the peak arises only from the isotope contrast within the germanium, side reactions like solid-electrolyte interphase growth do not shift it. The experiments show that amorphous germanium expands reversibly by as much as 250 percent when it reaches a lithium content of three atoms per germanium atom. The measured expansion stays the same regardless of how fast the battery is cycled, how many times it has been used, or how thick the individual layers are.

Core claim

A natGe-73Ge multilayer film functions as a model electrode whose isotope modulation produces a Bragg peak in operando neutron reflectivity. The scattering vector position of this peak directly reports the volume modification inside the active germanium, independent of solid-electrolyte interphase formation. Volume change as a function of lithium content x in LixGe is therefore obtained simply from the peak location without repeated full-pattern fitting. Measurements reveal a reversible expansion reaching 250 percent at x = 3 that does not depend on current density, cycle number, or layer thickness, with preliminary signs that crystallization of the lithiated phase leaves the volume response

What carries the argument

The natGe-73Ge isotope multilayer, whose periodic contrast creates a Bragg peak whose position tracks only the volume change inside the active electrode material.

If this is right

  • Amorphous germanium electrodes expand reversibly up to 250 percent at full lithiation to Li3Ge.
  • The expansion magnitude remains constant across different current densities, cycle counts, and individual layer thicknesses.
  • Volume change versus lithium content can be read directly from the Bragg peak position rather than from full reflectivity curve fitting.
  • Crystallization of the lithiated germanium phase appears not to change the observed volume behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same isotope-multilayer approach could be applied to silicon or other high-capacity alloy anodes to isolate their intrinsic volume swings.
  • If the Bragg-peak method proves general, it would allow faster screening of electrode designs aimed at reducing mechanical stress in cycling batteries.
  • Combining the neutron data with simultaneous electrochemical measurements could link specific volume thresholds to capacity fade or cracking.

Load-bearing premise

The Bragg peak position moves solely because of volume change inside the germanium layers and is not altered by surface films or side reactions that form during cycling.

What would settle it

A measurable shift in Bragg peak position during a control run in which no lithium is inserted into the germanium, or a mismatch between the observed peak shift and the known density change of LixGe, would show the method is not selective to electrode volume alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19519 by Daniel Uxa, Erwin Hueger, Harald Schmidt, Jochen Stahn, Lars Doerrer.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the NR pattern of the film electrode in an electrolyte-filled electrochemical cell in its pristine state (before the first lithium insertion). Small oscillations (fringes) are visible between a wave vector of 0.01 and 0.04 Å⁻¹. These fringes stem from neutron beam reflections at the two interfaces of the Cu current collector. The film thickness of the Cu current collector was determined using the Kie… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Contour plots of NR patterns as a function of scattering vector and of SOC during the first cycle for (a,b) operando measurements of the 20×[natGe(7.0nm)/73Ge(7.0nm)] electrode with a constant current density of 4 µAcm-2 , and for (b,d) corresponding simulations. Cycling times and electrode potential are indicated. The NR intensity is displayed on color scale. High to low intensity is displayed from red, … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This study reports on advancements in operando characterization of volume changes in lithium-ion battery (LIB) electrode materials during electrochemical cycling. Volume changes are crucial for LIB operation because they are related to the amount of stored energy as well as LIB integrity, performance, and safety. The study introduces a method based on isotope multilayers as active material to track the intrinsic modification of electrode volume in real time under operating conditions with operando neutron reflectometry. A natGe-73Ge multilayer film is used as a model system to measure the volume change of amorphous germanium electrodes during charging and discharging. Isotope modulation produces a Bragg peak in the neutron reflectivity pattern, sensitive only to the modification of volume within the active material of the electrode. Battery side reactions, such as the growth and reduction of the solid-electrolyte interphase is excluded. Using this method, the volume modification as a function of Li content x in LixGe can easily be derived from the scattering vector position of the Bragg peak without fitting numerous complex reflectivity patterns. The experiments show a reversible volume change of amorphous germanium of up to 250 percent for x = 3, which appears to be largely independent of current density, cycle number, and the thickness of the individual Ge layers. Also, there are tentative indications that the crystallization and re-amorphization of LixGe are not influencing the volume change.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an operando neutron reflectometry technique using natGe/73Ge isotope multilayers as a model electrode material. It claims that the scattering vector position of the resulting Bragg peak directly yields the volume change of the active amorphous germanium as a function of Li content x in LixGe, without requiring fits to complex reflectivity curves. The central experimental result is a reversible volume expansion reaching 250% at x=3 that is reported to be largely independent of current density, cycle number, and individual layer thickness; side reactions such as SEI growth are asserted to be excluded by the isotope-contrast design. Tentative observations on the lack of influence from crystallization/re-amorphization are also noted.

Significance. If substantiated, the approach would provide a useful tool for isolating intrinsic volume changes in alloying anodes under operating conditions, which is relevant to mechanical stability and performance in high-capacity LIBs. The direct, parameter-free extraction from Bragg-peak position is a methodological strength, and the isotope-multilayer design addresses a common interference issue. The stress-test concern regarding side reactions does not undermine the central claim, as the modulated contrast is built into the natGe/73Ge layering.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section] Results section: the reported 250% reversible expansion at x=3 and its claimed independence from current density, cycle number, and layer thickness are presented without accompanying error bars, uncertainty quantification, or statistical measures of variability across replicates; this weakens evaluation of the robustness of the independence statements.
  2. [Methods section] Methods and experimental details: full protocols for electrochemical cell assembly, neutron reflectometry acquisition parameters, and the precise procedure for converting Bragg-peak q-position to volume (including any corrections for substrate or electrolyte contributions) are not provided in sufficient detail to allow independent verification or reproduction of the side-reaction exclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'tentative indications' concerning crystallization effects is introduced without further elaboration or reference to supporting data/figures; this should be clarified or removed to avoid ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and positive assessment of the potential utility of our isotope-multilayer approach for operando volume-change measurements. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of results and methodological details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section] Results section: the reported 250% reversible expansion at x=3 and its claimed independence from current density, cycle number, and layer thickness are presented without accompanying error bars, uncertainty quantification, or statistical measures of variability across replicates; this weakens evaluation of the robustness of the independence statements.

    Authors: We agree that explicit error bars and uncertainty quantification would improve the evaluation of robustness. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to the volume-expansion data derived from the precision of Bragg-peak q-position determination. We will also report standard deviations calculated from the observed variations across multiple cycles and different layer thicknesses within the existing dataset to quantify the claimed independence. While the study did not include fully independent replicate samples prepared under separate conditions, the consistency across cycling provides a direct measure of variability that we will now present statistically. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods section] Methods and experimental details: full protocols for electrochemical cell assembly, neutron reflectometry acquisition parameters, and the precise procedure for converting Bragg-peak q-position to volume (including any corrections for substrate or electrolyte contributions) are not provided in sufficient detail to allow independent verification or reproduction of the side-reaction exclusion.

    Authors: We accept that additional methodological detail is required for reproducibility. The revised Methods section will include complete protocols for electrochemical cell assembly (materials, sealing, electrolyte composition, and electrode preparation), neutron reflectometry acquisition parameters (wavelength, q-range, resolution, and counting times), and the exact conversion procedure from Bragg-peak q-position to volume change. This will specify the formula, scattering-length-density assumptions for the natGe/73Ge layers, and any substrate or electrolyte corrections applied. The expanded description will also clarify how the built-in isotope contrast ensures the Bragg peak reports only active-material volume changes, thereby excluding side-reaction contributions such as SEI growth. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: direct physical mapping from Bragg peak position

full rationale

The paper's core result follows from the established neutron reflectometry relation q = 2π/d between measured Bragg peak position and bilayer spacing d in the natGe/73Ge isotope multilayer. Volume expansion is obtained by scaling the observed Δd with the known initial thickness; this conversion uses only the isotope contrast design (which excludes SEI contrast) and standard scattering kinematics. No parameter is fitted to the target volume data, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The reported 250 % expansion at x = 3 and its independence from rate/cycle/layer thickness are therefore experimental outcomes, not tautological restatements of the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method rests on standard neutron scattering and electrochemistry assumptions rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The scattering vector position of the Bragg peak directly encodes the interlayer spacing and thus the volume of the active material layers.
    Invoked to allow volume derivation without complex reflectivity fitting.
  • domain assumption Isotope modulation renders the Bragg peak insensitive to side reactions such as SEI formation.
    Stated as the basis for excluding battery side reactions from the measurement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5562 in / 1356 out tokens · 38653 ms · 2026-05-10T02:14:06.479932+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In situ and operando characterization: Advancing our understanding of functional materials

    Bonn , M.; Domke; K.F.; Sulpizi; M.; McCrory; C.; Peng, Z. In situ and operando characterization: Advancing our understanding of functional materials. Special Collection: In situ and Operando Characterization. J. Chem. Phys . 2025, 162, 140402. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0270688

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0270688 2025

  2. [2]

    ACS Materials Au 2024, 4, 346-353

    Karlsson, M.; Johansson, L.-G.; Mazzei, L.; Froitzheim, J.; Wolff, M. ACS Materials Au 2024, 4, 346-353. DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00011

    work page doi:10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00011 2024

  3. [3]

    Neutron Reflectometry Studies on the Lithiation of Amorphous Silicon Electrodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries

    Jerliu, B.; Dörrer, L.; Hüger, E.; Borchardt, G.; Steitz, R.; Geckle, U.; Oberst, V.; Bruns, M.; Schneider, O.; Schmidt, H. Neutron Reflectometry Studies on the Lithiation of Amorphous Silicon Electrodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 7777-7784. DOI: 10.1039/c3cp44438d

    work page doi:10.1039/c3cp44438d 2013

  4. [4]

    Volume Expansion during Lithiation of Amorphous Silicon Thin Film Electrodes Studied by In-Operando Neutron Reflectometry

    Jerliu, B.; Dörrer, L.; Hüger, E.; Seidlhofer, B.-K.; Steitz, R.; Geckle, U.; Oberst, V.; Bruns, M.; Schmidt, H. Volume Expansion during Lithiation of Amorphous Silicon Thin Film Electrodes Studied by In-Operando Neutron Reflectometry. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 9395–9399. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp502261t

    work page doi:10.1021/jp502261t 2014

  5. [5]

    A.; Wang, H

    DeCaluwe, S.C.; Dhar, B.M.; Huang, L.; He, Y.; Yang, K.; Owejan, J.P.; Zhao, Y.; Talin, A.A.; Dura, J. A.; Wang, H. Pore collapse and regrowth in silicon electrodes for rechargeable batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys . 2015, 17, 11301. DOI: 10.1039/c4cp06017b

    work page doi:10.1039/c4cp06017b 2015

  6. [6]

    Lithiation of Crystalline Silicon As Analyzed by Operando Neutron Reflectivity

    Seidlhofer, B.-K.; Jerliu, B.; Trapp, M.; Hüger, E.; Risse, S.; Cubitt, R.; Schmidt, H.; Steitz, R.; Ballauff, M. Lithiation of Crystalline Silicon As Analyzed by Operando Neutron Reflectivity. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7458–7466. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b02032

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b02032 2016

  7. [7]

    Kawaura, H.; Harada, M.; Kondo, Y.; Kondo, H.; Suganuma, Y.; Takahashi, N.; Sugiyama, J.; Seno, Y.; Yamada, N. L. Operando Measurement of Solid Electrolyte Interphase Formation at Working Electrode of Li ion Battery by Time slicing Neutron Reflectometry. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 9540 -9544. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b01170. 35

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.6b01170 2016

  8. [8]

    -K.; Steitz, R.; Borchardt, G.; Schmidt, H

    Jerliu, B.; Dörrer, L.; Hüger, E.; Seidlhofer, B. -K.; Steitz, R.; Borchardt, G.; Schmidt, H. Electrochemical lithiation of silicon electrodes: neutron reflectometry and secondary ion mass spectrometry investigations, Int. J. Mater. Res. 2017, 108, 999

    2017

  9. [9]

    Nanolayer Analysis by Neutron Reflectometry, in: Imae, T

    Dura, J.A., Rus, E.D., Kienzle, P.A., Maranville, B.B., 2017. Nanolayer Analysis by Neutron Reflectometry, in: Imae, T. (Ed.), Nanolayer Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 155–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63739-0.00005-0

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63739-0.00005-0 2017

  10. [10]

    -K.; Steitz, R.; Horisberger, M.; Schmidt, H

    Jerliu, B.; Hüger, E.; Dörrer, L.; Seidlhofer, B. -K.; Steitz, R.; Horisberger, M.; Schmidt, H. Lithium Insertion into Silicon Electrodes Studied by Cyclic Voltammetry and Operando Neutron Reflectometry, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 23480

    2018

  11. [11]

    On the Lithiation Mechanism of Amorphous Silicon Electrodes in Li -Ion Batteries

    Uxa, D.; Jerliu, B.; Hüger, E.; Dörrer, L.; Horisberger, M.; Stahn, J.; Schmidt, H. On the Lithiation Mechanism of Amorphous Silicon Electrodes in Li -Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 22027–22039. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06011

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06011 2019

  12. [12]

    Volume expansion of amorphous silicon electrodes during potentiostatic lithiation of Li -ion batteries, Electrochemistry Communications 2020, 115, 106738

    Schmidt, H.; Jerliu, B.; Hüger, E.; Stahn, J. Volume expansion of amorphous silicon electrodes during potentiostatic lithiation of Li -ion batteries, Electrochemistry Communications 2020, 115, 106738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106738

    work page doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106738 2020

  13. [13]

    G. M. Veith, K. L. Browning, M. Doucet, J. F. Browning. Solid Electrolyte Interphase Architecture Determined through In Situ Neutron Scattering. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 060523

    2021

  14. [14]

    Neutron Reflectometry of Lithium -Based Secondary Batteries, Small Struct

    Hu, D.; Zhan, X.; Wang, X.; Lin, H.; Gao, L.; Tu, H.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, T.; Han, S. Neutron Reflectometry of Lithium -Based Secondary Batteries, Small Struct. 2025, 6, 2400542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202400542

    work page doi:10.1002/sstr.202400542 2025

  15. [15]

    Identification of Lithiation Mechanisms in Li -Ion Batteries: Multilayer Electrodes and Neutron Reflectometry

    Hüger, E.; Stahn, J.; Schmidt, H. Identification of Lithiation Mechanisms in Li -Ion Batteries: Multilayer Electrodes and Neutron Reflectometry. ACS Energy Letters 2026, 11, 2275–2281. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.5c04221

    work page doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.5c04221 2026

  16. [16]

    Irreversible lithium storage during lithiation of amorphous silicon thin film electrodes studied by in -situ neutron reflectometry

    Jerliu, B.; Hüger, E.; Horisberger, M.; Stahn, J.; Schmidt, H. Irreversible lithium storage during lithiation of amorphous silicon thin film electrodes studied by in -situ neutron reflectometry. J. Power Sources 2017, 359, 415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.095

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.095 2017

  17. [17]

    Hüger, J

    E. Hüger, J. Stahn, H. Schmidt, Self -Diffusion of Ge in Amorphous GexSi1 –x Films Studied In Situ by Neutron Reflectometry, ACS Mater. Au 2024, 4, 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00046

    work page doi:10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00046 2024

  18. [18]

    In-situ Measurement of Self -Atom Diffusion in Solids Using Amorphous Germanium as a Model System

    Hüger, E.; Strauß, F.; Stahn, J.; Deubener, J.; Bruns, M.; Schmidt, H. In-situ Measurement of Self -Atom Diffusion in Solids Using Amorphous Germanium as a Model System. Scientific Reports 2018, 8, 17607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35915-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35915-1 2018

  19. [19]

    Activation energy of diffusion determined from a single in-situ neutron reflectometry experiment

    Hüger, E.; Stahn, J.; Schmidt, H. Activation energy of diffusion determined from a single in-situ neutron reflectometry experiment. Mat. Res. Lett . 2023, 11, 53. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2022.2114814

    work page doi:10.1080/21663831.2022.2114814 2023

  20. [20]

    Analysis of the Diffusion in a Multilayer Structure under a Constant Heating Rate: The Calculation of Activation Energy from the In Situ Neutron 36 Reflectometry Measurement

    Yang, F.; Schmidt, H.; Hüger, E. Analysis of the Diffusion in a Multilayer Structure under a Constant Heating Rate: The Calculation of Activation Energy from the In Situ Neutron 36 Reflectometry Measurement. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 27776−27783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c04029

    work page doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c04029 2023

  21. [21]

    In -situ Neutron Reflectometry to Determine Ge Self - Diffusivities and Activation Energy of Diffusion in Amorphous Ge0.8Si0.2

    Hüger, E.; Stahn, J.; Schmidt, H. In -situ Neutron Reflectometry to Determine Ge Self - Diffusivities and Activation Energy of Diffusion in Amorphous Ge0.8Si0.2. EPJ Web of Conferences 2023, 286, 05002. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328605002

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202328605002 2023

  22. [22]

    Neutron reflectometry to measure in -situ Li permeation through ultrathin silicon layers and interfaces

    Hüger, E.; Stahn, J.; Schmidt, H. Neutron reflectometry to measure in -situ Li permeation through ultrathin silicon layers and interfaces. J. Electrochem. Soc . 2015, 162, A7104. DOI 10.1149/2.0131513jes

    work page doi:10.1149/2.0131513jes 2015

  23. [23]

    Self- diffusion in amorphous silicon

    Strauß, F.; Dörrer, L.; Geue, T.; Stahn, J.; Koutsioubas, A.; Mattauch, S.; Schmidt, H. Self- diffusion in amorphous silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett . 2016, 116, 025901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.025901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.025901 2016

  24. [24]

    Focusing neutron reflectometry

    Stahn, J.; Glavic, A. Focusing neutron reflectometry. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A. 2016, 821, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.03.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2016.03.007 2016

  25. [25]

    Hüger, L

    E. Hüger, L. Riedel, J. Zhu, J. Stahn, P. Heitjans, and H. Schmidt, Lithium niobate for fast cycling in Li -ion batteries: Review and new experimental data, Batteries 2023, 9, 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9050244

    work page doi:10.3390/batteries9050244 2023

  26. [26]

    Hüger, E.; Tietze, U.; Lott, D.; Bracht, H.; Haller, E.E.; Bougeard, D.; Schmidt, H.; Self - diffusion in Germanium Isotope Multilayers at Low Temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett . 2008, 93, 162104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3002294

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3002294 2008

  27. [27]

    E.; Geue, T

    Kube, R.; Bracht, H.; Hüger, E.; Schmidt, H.; Hansen, J.L.; Larsen, A.N.; Ager III, J.W.; Haller, E. E.; Geue, T. Geue, Stahn, J. Contributions of vacancies and self-interstitials to self-diffusion in silicon under thermal equilibrium and nonequilibrium conditions. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 085206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085206

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.085206 2013

  28. [28]

    Electrochemical investigation of ion -beam sputter - deposited carbon thin films for Li -ion batteries, J

    Hüger, E.; Jin, C.; Schmidt, H. Electrochemical investigation of ion -beam sputter - deposited carbon thin films for Li -ion batteries, J. Appl. Electrochem . 2022, 52, 1715-

    2022

  29. [29]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-022-01737-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10800-022-01737-3

  30. [30]

    & Schmidt, H

    Hüger, E., Jin, C. & Schmidt, H. C-Rate Capability of Ion-Beam Sputter Deposited Silicon, Carbon and Silicon/Carbon Multilayer Thin Films for Li -Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc.2022, 169, 080525. DOI 10.1149/1945-7111/ac8a79

    work page doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ac8a79 2022

  31. [31]

    and Schmidt, H

    Hüger, E.; Uxa, D.; Yang, F. and Schmidt, H. The Lithiation Onset of Amorphous Silicon Thin-Film Electrodes, APL Special Topic: New technologies and applications of advanced batteries. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 221, 133901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0109610

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0109610 2022

  32. [32]

    Review and stress analysis on the lithiation onset of amorphous silicon films, Batteries 2023, 9, 105

    Zhang, K.; Hüger, E.; Li, Y.; Schmidt, H.; Yang, F. Review and stress analysis on the lithiation onset of amorphous silicon films, Batteries 2023, 9, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9020105

    work page doi:10.3390/batteries9020105 2023

  33. [33]

    Reaction of Li with alloy thin films studied by in situ AFM

    Beaulieu, L.; Hatchard, T.; Bonakdarpour, A.; Fleischauer, M.; Dahn, J. Reaction of Li with alloy thin films studied by in situ AFM. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150, A1457. 37

    2003

  34. [34]

    In Situ Atomic Force Microscopy of Lithiation and Delithiation of Silicon Nanostructures for Lithium Ion Batteries

    Becker, C.R.; Strawhecker, K.E.; McAllister, Q.P.; Lundgren, C.A. In Situ Atomic Force Microscopy of Lithiation and Delithiation of Silicon Nanostructures for Lithium Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2013, 10, 9173–9182. DOI 10.1021/nn4037909

    work page doi:10.1021/nn4037909 2013

  35. [35]

    In situ and operando atomic force microscopy of high -capacity nano-silicon based electrodes for lithium -ion batteries

    Breitung, B.; Baumann, P.; Sommer, H.; Janek, J.; Brezesinski, T. In situ and operando atomic force microscopy of high -capacity nano-silicon based electrodes for lithium -ion batteries. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 14048. DOI: 10.1039/c6nr03575b

    work page doi:10.1039/c6nr03575b 2016

  36. [36]

    In situ and Operando Tracking of Microstructure and Volume Evolution of Silicon Electrodes by using Synchrotron X -ray Imaging

    Dong, K.; Markötter, H.; Sun, F.; Hilger, A.; Kardjilov, N.; Banhart, J.; Manke, I . In situ and Operando Tracking of Microstructure and Volume Evolution of Silicon Electrodes by using Synchrotron X -ray Imaging . ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 261 – 269. DOI 10.1002/cssc.201801969

    work page doi:10.1002/cssc.201801969 2019

  37. [37]

    Atomistic mechanisms of lithium insertion in amorphous silicon

    Huang, S.; Zhu, T. Atomistic mechanisms of lithium insertion in amorphous silicon. J. Power. Sources. 2011, 196, 3664–3668. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.155

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.155 2011

  38. [38]

    Structural evolution of Si -based anode materials during the lithiation reaction

    Wang, Z.; Li, F.; Ding, W.; Tang, X.; Xu, F.; Ding, Y . Structural evolution of Si -based anode materials during the lithiation reaction . Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 315707. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/abfa54

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6528/abfa54 2021

  39. [39]

    In Situ TEM Experiments of Electrochemical Lithiation and Delithiation of Individual Nanostructures

    Liu, X.H.; Liu, Y.; Kushima, A.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, T.; Li, J.; Huang, J.Y. In Situ TEM Experiments of Electrochemical Lithiation and Delithiation of Individual Nanostructures. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 722–741. DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201200024

    work page doi:10.1002/aenm.201200024 2012

  40. [40]

    Guifo, S. B. O.; Mueller, J. E.; Henriques, D.; Markus, T. First-principles calculations of bulk, surface and interfacial phases and properties of silicon graphite composites as anode materials for lithium ion batteries . Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 9432. DOI: 10.1039/d1cp05414g

    work page doi:10.1039/d1cp05414g 2022

  41. [41]

    First -Principles Dynamics Investigation of Germanium as an Anode Material in Multivalent-Ion Batteries

    Kim, C.; Hwang, U.; Lee, S.; Han, Y. First -Principles Dynamics Investigation of Germanium as an Anode Material in Multivalent-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials 2023, 13,

    2023

  42. [42]

    https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13212868

    work page doi:10.3390/nano13212868

  43. [43]

    Tough Germanium Nanoparticles under Electrochemical Cycling

    Liang, W.; Yiang, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.H.; Huang, J.Y.; Zhu, T.; Zhang, S. Tough Germanium Nanoparticles under Electrochemical Cycling . ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3427–

    2013

  44. [44]

    DOI 10.1021/nn400330h

    work page doi:10.1021/nn400330h

  45. [45]

    H.; Huang, S.; Picraux, S

    Liu, X. H.; Huang, S.; Picraux, S. T.; Li, J.; Zhu, T.; Huang, J. Y. Reversible Nanopore Formation in Ge Nanowires during Lithiation -Delithiation Cycling: An In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy Study. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3991-3997

    2011

  46. [46]

    Parratt32 or the reflectometry tool, HMI, Berlin

    Braun, C. Parratt32 or the reflectometry tool, HMI, Berlin. https://parratt32.software.informer.com/1.6/. 14 August 2005

    2005

  47. [47]

    Parratt, L. G. Surface Studies of Solids by Total Reflection of X -Rays. Phys. Rev. 1954, 95, 359–369. doi:10.1103/physrev.95.359

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.95.359 1954

  48. [48]

    Scattering Length Density Calculator

    Munter, A.; Website Owner: NCNR. Scattering Length Density Calculator. http://www.ncnrs.nist.gov/resources/sldcalc.html (accessed 2025 -03-12). National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). US department of commerce. NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR). 38

    2025

  49. [49]

    Energies 2023, 16, 2740

    Hüger, E.; Jin, C.; Meyer, K.; Uxa, D.; Yang,F.; Invited: Investigation of Carbon/Copper Multilayer to Examine the Influence of Copper Coating on the Li -Storage Performance of Carbon. Energies 2023, 16, 2740. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062740

    work page doi:10.3390/en16062740 2023

  50. [50]

    Permeation, solubility, diffusion and segregation of lithium in amorphous silicon layers

    Hüger, E.; Dörrer, L.; Schmidt H. Permeation, solubility, diffusion and segregation of lithium in amorphous silicon layers. Chem Mater 2018, 30, 3254–3264. https:// doi. org/

    2018

  51. [51]

    chemmater

    1021/ acs. chemmater. 8b001 86

  52. [52]

    Pelton, A. D. The Cu-Li (Copper-Lithium) System. Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. 1986, 7, 142-

    1986

  53. [53]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02881552

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02881552

  54. [54]

    Cu -Li (Copper -Lithium)

    Okamoto, H. Cu -Li (Copper -Lithium). J. Phase Equilib. Diffus . 2011, 32, 172. DOI: 10.1007/s11669-010-9840-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11669-010-9840-3 2011

  55. [55]

    Thermodynamic Evaluation of Cu-Li Phase Diagram from EMF Measurements and DTA Study

    Gasior, W.; Onderka, B.; Moser, Z.; Debski, A.; Gancarz, T. Thermodynamic Evaluation of Cu-Li Phase Diagram from EMF Measurements and DTA Study. Calphad 2009, 33, 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2008.10.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2008.10.006 2009

  56. [56]

    Wadsley –Roth Crystallographic Shear Structure Niobium -Based Oxides: Promising Anode Materials for High -Safety Lithium -Ion Batteries

    Yang, Y.; Zhao, J. Wadsley –Roth Crystallographic Shear Structure Niobium -Based Oxides: Promising Anode Materials for High -Safety Lithium -Ion Batteries. Adv. Sci . 2021, 8, 2004855. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202004855

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202004855 2021

  57. [57]

    Electrochemical Characterizations of Germanium and Carbon-Coated Germanium Composite Anode for Lithium -Ion Batteries

    Yoon, S.; Park, C.M.; Sohn, H.J. Electrochemical Characterizations of Germanium and Carbon-Coated Germanium Composite Anode for Lithium -Ion Batteries. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2008, 11, A42. DOI 10.1149/1.2836481

    work page doi:10.1149/1.2836481 2008

  58. [58]

    Baggetto, L.; Notten, P. H. L. Lithium -Ion (De)Insertion Reaction of Germanium Thin - Film Electrodes: An Electrochemical and In Situ XRD Study. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2009, 156, A169-A175. DOI 10.1149/1.3055984

    work page doi:10.1149/1.3055984 2009

  59. [59]

    Storage Capacity and Cycling Stability in Ge Anodes: Relationship of Anode Structure and Cycling Rate

    Lim, L.Y.; Fan, S.; Hng, H.H.; Toney, M.F. Storage Capacity and Cycling Stability in Ge Anodes: Relationship of Anode Structure and Cycling Rate. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500599. DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500599

    work page doi:10.1002/aenm.201500599 2015

  60. [60]

    Recent progress on germanium -based anodes for lithium ion batteries: Efficient lithiation strategies and mechanisms

    Liu, X.; Wu, X.Y.; Chang, B.; Wang, K.X. Recent progress on germanium -based anodes for lithium ion batteries: Efficient lithiation strategies and mechanisms. Energy Storage Materials 2020, 30, 146-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.010 2020

  61. [61]

    Germanium -Based Electrode Materials for Lithium -Ion Batteries

    Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, T. Germanium -Based Electrode Materials for Lithium -Ion Batteries. ChemElectroChem 2014, 1, 706 – 713. DOI: 10.1002/celc.201300195

    work page doi:10.1002/celc.201300195 2014

  62. [62]

    D.; Dahn, J

    Hatchard, T. D.; Dahn, J. R. In Situ XRD and Electrochemical Study of the Reaction of Lithium with Amorphous Silicon. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, A838

    2004

  63. [63]

    N.; Christensen, L

    Obravac, M. N.; Christensen, L. Structural Changes in Silicon Anode during Lithium Insertion/Extraction. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2004, 7, A93

    2004

  64. [64]

    P.; Pair Distribution Function Analysis and Solid State NMR Studies of Silicon Electrodes for Lithium Ion Batteries: Understanding the (De)lithiation Mechanisms

    Key, B.; Morcrette, M.; Tarascon, J.-M.; Grey, C. P.; Pair Distribution Function Analysis and Solid State NMR Studies of Silicon Electrodes for Lithium Ion Batteries: Understanding the (De)lithiation Mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 503. 39

    2011

  65. [65]

    J.; Fraser, A

    Ogata, K.; Salager, E.; Kerr, C. J.; Fraser, A. E.; Ducati, C.; Morris, A. J.; Hofmann, S.; Grey, C. P. Revealing lithium–silicide phase transformations in nano-structured silicon- based lithium ion batteries via in situ NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3217

    2014

  66. [66]

    85% of people named ’Connor’ are White

    Bao, W.; Fang, C.; Cheng, D.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, B.; Tan, D.; Shimizu, R.; Sreenarayanan, B.; Bai, S.; Li, W.; Zhang, M.; Shirley Meng, Y. Quantifying lithium loss in amorphous silicon thin-film anodes via titration-gas chromatography. Cell Reports Physical Science 2021, 2, 100597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100597

    work page doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100597 2021

  67. [67]

    Clark, A. H. Electrical and Optical Properties of Amorphous Germanium. Phys. Rev. 1967, 154, 750-757

    1967

  68. [68]

    Ion beam sputter deposition of Ge films: Influence of process parameters on film properties

    Bundesmann, C.; Feder, R.; Wunderlich, R.; Teschner, U.; Grundmann, M.; Neumann, H. Ion beam sputter deposition of Ge films: Influence of process parameters on film properties. Thin Solid Films 2015, 589, 487 –492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2015.06.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2015.06.017 2015

  69. [69]

    A Free Volume-Based Viscoplastic Model for Amorphous Silicon Electrode of Lithium-Ion Battery

    Li, Y., Mao, W., Zhang, Q.; Zhang, K.; Yang, F. A Free Volume-Based Viscoplastic Model for Amorphous Silicon Electrode of Lithium-Ion Battery. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2020, 167, 040518. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab75c0

    work page doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab75c0 2020

  70. [70]

    Chou, C .-Y.; Hwang, G. (2014). On the origin of the significant difference in lithiation behavior between silicon and germanium. Journal of Power Sources . 2014, 263. 252–

    2014

  71. [71]

    Table of Contents (TOC)/Abstract Graphic

    DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.011. Table of Contents (TOC)/Abstract Graphic

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.011 2014