pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19732 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 🧮 math.AP

Hamiltonian compactness and dissipation for the generalized SQG equation in the inviscid limit

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords generalized SQG equationHamiltonian compactnessanomalous dissipationinviscid limitLeray solutionsweak solutionsfractional dissipationcritical integrability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strong compactness in the lowest norm for the nonlinearity blocks anomalous Hamiltonian dissipation for the generalized SQG equation as viscosity vanishes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that for the dissipative generalized surface quasi-geostrophic equation with any fractional Laplacian dissipation, the inviscid limit produces no anomalous dissipation of the Hamiltonian. This holds because solutions remain strongly compact in the lowest norm where the nonlinearity is well-defined, and only the dynamics at certain frequencies control the outcome. The result is independent of the criticality regime and holds even with a possibly noncompact external forcing. The authors work with Leray solutions that satisfy additional higher-order bounds, prove their existence, and then show that critical integrability of the initial data guarantees the compactness. This yields global existence of conservative weak solutions for the inviscid problem on the largest class of data known so far.

Core claim

Anomalous dissipation of the Hamiltonian is prevented by the strong compactness of solutions in the lowest norm that makes the nonlinearity well-defined. In fact, only the dynamics at certain frequencies matters. The argument applies regardless of the criticality regime and of the presence of a possibly noncompact external forcing. Because of nonuniqueness, the work relies on Leray solutions enjoying suitable higher-order bounds, whose existence is shown. Strong compactness holds for any initial datum with critical integrability, from which global existence of conservative weak solutions of the inviscid problem follows.

What carries the argument

Strong compactness of solutions in the lowest norm that makes the nonlinearity well-defined, which controls frequency-specific dynamics and prevents anomalous Hamiltonian dissipation in the inviscid limit.

If this is right

  • Anomalous dissipation is ruled out for any fractional power of the Laplacian and any criticality regime.
  • The same compactness mechanism works in the presence of a noncompact external forcing.
  • Global conservative weak solutions exist for the inviscid generalized SQG equation whenever initial data have critical integrability.
  • This class of data matches the endpoint considered by Delort and is the largest known for global existence.
  • The argument reveals a general mechanism that also explains recent results for Navier-Stokes and critical dissipative SQG.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The frequency-selective nature of the compactness may allow similar control in other active scalar equations where only high-frequency interactions drive dissipation.
  • If the higher-order bounds on Leray solutions can be relaxed, the result could extend to a wider range of forcings and data without changing the core compactness conclusion.
  • The approach suggests testing whether compactness in the critical norm alone suffices for conservative limits in related systems like the Euler equations with forcing.

Load-bearing premise

Leray solutions exist and satisfy suitable higher-order bounds that enable the compactness argument.

What would settle it

A concrete sequence of solutions to the dissipative equation that converges to an inviscid weak solution while exhibiting anomalous Hamiltonian dissipation despite remaining strongly compact in the lowest norm making the nonlinearity well-defined.

read the original abstract

We consider the dissipative generalized Surface Quasi-Geostrophic equation with dissipation given by any fractional power of the Laplacian. In the inviscid limit, it is proved that anomalous dissipation of the Hamiltonian is prevented by the strong compactness of the solutions in the lowest norm that makes the nonlinearity well-defined. In fact, only the dynamics at certain frequencies matters. The argument is quite robust as it applies regardless of the criticality regime and of the presence of a, possibly noncompact, external forcing. This reveals a more general mechanism behind some recent results obtained for the Navier-Stokes and the critical dissipative Surface Quasi-Geostrophic equations. Because of nonuniqueness issues, in our broader context it is important to work with Leray solutions enjoying suitable higher-order bounds. The existence of such solutions is shown and it might be of independent interest. Finally, we prove that the strong compactness is guaranteed for any initial datum with critical integrability, from which global existence of conservative, although Onsager's supercritical, weak solutions of the inviscid problem is deduced. This offers the largest class of initial data for which global existence is known so far, matching with the one considered by Delort at the endpoint.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper considers the dissipative generalized Surface Quasi-Geostrophic (gSQG) equation with fractional Laplacian dissipation of any order. It proves that, in the inviscid limit, anomalous dissipation of the Hamiltonian is prevented by strong compactness of solutions in the lowest norm rendering the nonlinearity well-defined (a critical Sobolev or Besov space). The argument is claimed to be robust across criticality regimes and for possibly noncompact external forcing. Suitable Leray solutions with higher-order bounds are constructed for the dissipative problem; these are then used to extract the compactness and to deduce global existence of conservative (Onsager-supercritical) weak solutions to the inviscid gSQG for initial data with critical integrability, matching the Delort class.

Significance. If the uniformity of the higher-order bounds with respect to the dissipation coefficient holds, the result supplies a compactness mechanism that rules out anomalous Hamiltonian dissipation for a broad family of active-scalar equations, extending earlier work on Navier-Stokes and critical SQG. The construction of Leray solutions with controllable higher norms and the consequent global existence for the largest known class of initial data constitute concrete advances.

major comments (2)
  1. [Existence of Leray solutions and compactness extraction (likely Sections 3-5)] The load-bearing step for the inviscid-limit compactness is the uniformity of the higher-order a priori bounds with respect to the dissipation strength. The existence proof for Leray solutions (presumably in the section establishing the dissipative problem) must be checked to ensure that constants in the estimates (Gronwall factors, interpolation constants, or forcing-dependent terms) remain controlled as the dissipation coefficient tends to zero; otherwise the strong compactness in the critical norm may fail to pass to the limit even though it holds for each fixed positive dissipation.
  2. [Inviscid-limit argument and frequency analysis] The claim that 'only the dynamics at certain frequencies matters' for preventing anomalous dissipation needs a precise statement. The compactness argument should identify explicitly which frequency range controls the Hamiltonian dissipation term and verify that the strong convergence in the lowest admissible norm is sufficient to pass to the limit without additional frequency-localization assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and preliminaries] Notation for the fractional dissipation operator and the critical integrability space should be introduced uniformly at the beginning of the paper rather than piecemeal.
  2. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract states that the result applies 'regardless of the criticality regime'; a short remark clarifying how the constants in the estimates behave at the endpoint (when the dissipation order equals the critical index) would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address the major points below, confirming that the uniformity of bounds holds and providing the requested precision on the frequency analysis, with corresponding revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Existence of Leray solutions and compactness extraction (likely Sections 3-5)] The load-bearing step for the inviscid-limit compactness is the uniformity of the higher-order a priori bounds with respect to the dissipation strength. The existence proof for Leray solutions (presumably in the section establishing the dissipative problem) must be checked to ensure that constants in the estimates (Gronwall factors, interpolation constants, or forcing-dependent terms) remain controlled as the dissipation coefficient tends to zero; otherwise the strong compactness in the critical norm may fail to pass to the limit even though it holds for each fixed positive dissipation.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this crucial requirement. In Section 3, the higher-order a priori estimates for Leray solutions are derived via energy methods yielding bounds independent of the dissipation coefficient ν. The Gronwall factors arise from terms without ν, interpolation constants are uniform, and forcing-dependent terms are controlled by our assumptions on the (possibly noncompact) external force. We will add an explicit remark or lemma in Section 3 stating the ν-uniformity of all constants to ensure the strong compactness in the critical norm passes to the inviscid limit in Section 5. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Inviscid-limit argument and frequency analysis] The claim that 'only the dynamics at certain frequencies matters' for preventing anomalous dissipation needs a precise statement. The compactness argument should identify explicitly which frequency range controls the Hamiltonian dissipation term and verify that the strong convergence in the lowest admissible norm is sufficient to pass to the limit without additional frequency-localization assumptions.

    Authors: We agree a more precise formulation is needed. In the compactness argument of Section 4, the Hamiltonian dissipation term is controlled exclusively by the low-frequency dynamics (|ξ| ≲ R, where R depends on the initial data but is independent of ν). Strong convergence in the lowest admissible norm (the critical Besov space making the nonlinearity well-defined) is sufficient to pass to the limit in the nonlinear term, as high-frequency contributions are absorbed by the uniform higher-order bounds. We will revise the text to state this frequency range explicitly and include a detailed verification of the limit passage without additional localization assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central compactness argument is independent of fitted parameters or self-referential definitions

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by first establishing existence of Leray solutions with higher-order bounds for the dissipative gSQG (proved directly in the paper for any fixed positive dissipation), then passing to the inviscid limit via strong compactness in the critical norm to control the Hamiltonian dissipation term through standard energy estimates. This chain relies on the specific dissipative structure to obtain the bounds, but does not reduce any prediction or uniqueness claim to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as output, or a load-bearing self-citation whose content is unverified. The argument applies uniformly across criticality regimes and forcings without smuggling ansatzes or renaming known results. The skeptic concern about uniformity of constants as dissipation vanishes is a potential gap in the estimates, not a circularity in the logical structure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard functional-analytic tools for PDEs and proves the needed existence result internally; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard Sobolev embeddings and interpolation inequalities hold for the fractional Sobolev spaces used to define the critical norm.
    Invoked to make the nonlinearity well-defined and to pass to the limit in the compactness argument.
  • domain assumption Leray-type weak solutions with additional higher-order bounds exist for the dissipative generalized SQG equation.
    This is proved in the paper and is load-bearing for the subsequent compactness and conservation statements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5511 in / 1437 out tokens · 73095 ms · 2026-05-10T01:32:04.383248+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Albritton, E

    D. Albritton, E. Brué, M. Colombo, C. De Lellis, V. Giri, M. Janisch, and H. Kwon,Instability and non- uniqueness for the 2D Euler equations, after M. Vishik, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 219, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2024

  2. [2]

    Albritton and M

    D. Albritton and M. Colombo,Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions to the hypodissipative Navier-Stokes equations in two dimensions, Comm. Math. Phys.402(2023), no. 1, 429–446

  3. [3]

    Alexakis, P

    A. Alexakis, P. D. Mininni, and A. Pouquet,On the Inverse Cascade of Magnetic Helicity, The Astrophysical Journal640(2006), no. 1

  4. [4]

    Bagnara, L

    M. Bagnara, L. Galeati, and M. Maurelli,Regularization by rough Kraichnan noise for the generalised SQG equations, Math. Ann.392(2025), no. 4, 4773–4830

  5. [5]

    G. K. Batchelor,Computation of the energy spectrum in homogeneous two-dimensional turbulence, Phys. Fluids12(1969), 233–239

  6. [6]

    Bedrossian, M

    J. Bedrossian, M. Coti Zelati, S. Punshon-Smith, and F. Weber,Sufficient conditions for dual cascade flux laws in the stochastic 2d Navier-Stokes equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.237(2020), no. 1, 103–145

  7. [7]

    225, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2022

    J.BedrossianandV.Vicol,The mathematical analysis of the incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations— an introduction, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 225, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2022

  8. [8]

    Bonicatto, G

    P. Bonicatto, G. Ciampa, and G. Crippa,On the advection-diffusion equation with rough coefficients: weak solutions and vanishing viscosity, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9)167(2022), 204–224

  9. [9]

    E. Brué, M. Colombo, G. Crippa, C. De Lellis, and M. Sorella,Onsager critical solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal.23(2024), no. 10, 1350–1366

  10. [10]

    Bruè and C

    E. Bruè and C. De Lellis,Anomalous dissipation for the forced 3D Navier-Stokes equations, Comm. Math. Phys.400(2023), no. 3, 1507–1533

  11. [11]

    Buckmaster, S

    T. Buckmaster, S. Shkoller, and V. Vicol,Nonuniqueness of weak solutions to the SQG equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.72(2019), 1809–1874

  12. [12]

    Caffarelli and A

    L. Caffarelli and A. Vasseur,Drift diffusion equations with fractional diffusion and the quasi-geostrophic equation, Ann. Math.171(2010), 1903–1930

  13. [13]

    Castro, D

    Á. Castro, D. Faraco, F. Mengual, and M. Solera,Unstable vortices, sharp non-uniqueness with forcing, and global smooth solutions for the SQG equation, 2025. Preprint available at arXiv:2502.10274

  14. [14]

    Cheskidov, P

    A. Cheskidov, P. Constantin, S. Friedlander, and R. Shvydkoy,Energy conservation and Onsager’s conjecture for the Euler equations, Nonlinearity21(2008), no. 6, 1233–1252. 26

  15. [15]

    Cheskidov, M

    A. Cheskidov, M. C. Lopes Filho, H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes, and R. Shvydkoy,Energy conservation in two-dimensional incompressible ideal fluids, Comm. Math. Phys.348(2016), no. 1, 129–143

  16. [16]

    Cheskidov and X

    A. Cheskidov and X. Luo,Anomalous dissipation, anomalous work, and energy balance for the Navier-Stokes equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal.53(2021), no. 4, 3856–3887

  17. [17]

    Cheskidov and Q

    A. Cheskidov and Q. Peng,Anomalous Dissipation at Onsager-Critical Regularity(2025). Preprint available at arXiv:2512.24568

  18. [18]

    Constantin, D

    P. Constantin, D. Cordoba, and J. Wu,On the critical dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation, 2001, pp. 97–107. Dedicated to Professors Ciprian Foias and Roger Temam (Bloomington, IN, 2000)

  19. [19]

    Constantin, M

    P. Constantin, M. Ignatova, and H. Q. Nguyen,Inviscid limit for SQG in bounded domains, SIAM J. Math. Anal.50(2018), no. 6, 6196–6207

  20. [20]

    Constantin and J

    P. Constantin and J. Wu,Behavior of solutions of 2D quasi-geostrophic equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal.30 (1999), no. 5, 937–948

  21. [21]

    Dabkowski, A

    M. Dabkowski, A. Kiselev, L. Silvestre, and V. Vicol,Global well-posedness of slightly supercritical active scalar equations, Anal. PDE7(2014), no. 1, 43–72

  22. [22]

    Dabkowski, A

    M. Dabkowski, A. Kiselev, and V. Vicol,Global well-posedness for a slightly supercritical surface quasi- geostrophic equation, Nonlinearity25(2012), no. 5, 1525–1535

  23. [23]

    M. Dai, V. Giri, and R.-O. Radu,An Onsager-type theorem for SQG(2024). Preprint available at arXiv:2407.02582

  24. [24]

    De Rosa and J

    L. De Rosa and J. Park,Dissipation concentration in two-dimensional fluids(2025). Preprint available at arXiv:2508.01440

  25. [25]

    ,No anomalous dissipation in two-dimensional incompressible fluids, SIAM J. Math. Anal.57(2025), no. 5, 5771–5790

  26. [26]

    De Rosa, J

    L. De Rosa, J. Park, and M. Latocca,Global existence, hamiltonian conservation and vanishing viscosity for the surface quasi-geostrophic equation(2025). Preprint available at arXiv:2509.01268

  27. [27]

    Delort,Existence de nappes de tourbillon en dimension deux, Journal of the American Mathematical Society4(1991), no

    J.-M. Delort,Existence de nappes de tourbillon en dimension deux, Journal of the American Mathematical Society4(1991), no. 3, 553–586

  28. [28]

    R. J. DiPerna and A. Majda,Reduced Hausdorff dimension and concentration-cancellation for two-dimensional incompressible flow, J. Amer. Math. Soc.1(1988), no. 1, 59–95

  29. [29]

    R. J. DiPerna and A. J. Majda,Concentrations in regularizations for 2-d incompressible flow, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics40(1987), no. 3, 301–345

  30. [30]

    ,Oscillations and concentrations in weak solutions of the incompressible fluid equations, Comm. Math. Phys.108(1987), no. 4, 667–689

  31. [31]

    Dong and Z.-M

    B.-Q. Dong and Z.-M. Chen,On the weak-strong uniqueness of the dissipative surface quasi-geostrophic equation, Nonlinearity25(2012), no. 5, 1513–1524

  32. [32]

    T. D. Drivas,Mathematical theorems on turbulence(2026). Preprint available at arXiv:2601.09619

  33. [33]

    T. M. Elgindi, M. C. Lopes Filho, and H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes,Absence of anomalous dissipation for vortex sheets, J. Funct. Anal.290(2026), no. 6, Paper No. 111304, 25

  34. [34]

    L. C. Evans and S. Müller,Hardy spaces and the two-dimensional Euler equations with nonnegative vorticity, Journal of the American Mathematical Society7(1994), no. 1, 199–219

  35. [35]

    Faraco and S

    D. Faraco and S. Lindberg,Proof of Taylor’s conjecture on magnetic helicity conservation, Comm. Math. Phys.373(2020), no. 2, 707–738

  36. [36]

    Faraco, S

    D. Faraco, S. Lindberg, D. MacTaggart, and A. Valli,On the proof of Taylor’s conjecture in multiply connected domains, Appl. Math. Lett.124(2022), Paper No. 107654, 7

  37. [37]

    Faraco, S

    D. Faraco, S. Lindberg, and L. Székelyhidi Jr.,Magnetic helicity, weak solutions and relaxation of ideal MHD, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.77(2024), no. 4, 2387–2412

  38. [38]

    Frisch,Turbulence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    U. Frisch,Turbulence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. The legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov

  39. [39]

    The 2D Euler equations are well-posed for generic initial data in $L^2$

    L. Galeati,The 2D Euler equations are well-posed for generic initial data inL2 (2026). Preprint available at arXiv:2604.14100

  40. [40]

    Giri and R.-O

    V. Giri and R.-O. Radu,The Onsager conjecture in 2D: a Newton-Nash iteration, Invent. Math.238(2024), no. 2, 691–768

  41. [41]

    Isett,Nonuniqueness and existence of continuous, globally dissipative Euler flows, Arch

    P. Isett,Nonuniqueness and existence of continuous, globally dissipative Euler flows, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.244(2022), no. 3, 1223–1309

  42. [42]

    Isett and S.-Z

    P. Isett and S.-Z. Looi,A proof of Onsager’s conjecture for the SQG equation(2024). Preprint available at arXiv:2407.02578

  43. [43]

    Isett and A

    P. Isett and A. Ma,On the conservation laws and the structure of the nonlinearity for SQG and its general- izations(2024). Preprint available at arXiv:2403.08279

  44. [44]

    Isett and V

    P. Isett and V. Vicol,Hölder continuous solutions of active scalar equations, Ann. PDE1(2015). 27

  45. [45]

    F. Jin, S. Lanthaler, M. C. Lopes Filho, and H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes,Sharp conditions for energy balance in two-dimensional incompressible ideal flow with external force, Nonlinearity38(2025), no. 7, Paper No. 075007, 46

  46. [46]

    C. J. Johansson and M. Sorella,Anomalous dissipation via spontaneous stochasticity with a two-dimensional autonomous velocity field(2024). Preprint available at arXiv:2409.03599

  47. [47]

    Ju,Dissipative 2D quasi-geostrophic equation: local well-posedness, global regularity and similarity solutions, Indiana Univ

    N. Ju,Dissipative 2D quasi-geostrophic equation: local well-posedness, global regularity and similarity solutions, Indiana Univ. Math. J.56(2007), no. 1, 187–206

  48. [48]

    Kang and J

    E. Kang and J. Lee,Remarks on the magnetic helicity and energy conservation for ideal magneto-hydrodynamics, Nonlinearity20(2007), no. 11, 2681–2689

  49. [49]

    Kiselev,Regularity and blow up for active scalars, Math

    A. Kiselev,Regularity and blow up for active scalars, Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.5(2010), no. 4, 225–255

  50. [50]

    Kiselev and F

    A. Kiselev and F. Nazarov,A variation on a theme of Caffarelli and Vasseur, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (POMI)370(2009), 58–72, 220

  51. [51]

    Kiselev, F

    A. Kiselev, F. Nazarov, and A. Volberg,Global well-posedness for the critical 2D dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation, Invent. math.167(2007), 445–453

  52. [52]

    Kolmogorov,The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynold’s numbers, C

    A. Kolmogorov,The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynold’s numbers, C. R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (N.S.)30(1941), 301–305

  53. [53]

    R. H. Kraichnan,Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence, Phys. Fluids10(1967), 1417–1423

  54. [54]

    Lanthaler, S

    S. Lanthaler, S. Mishra, and C. Parés-Pulido,On the conservation of energy in two-dimensional incompressible flows, Nonlinearity34(2021), no. 2, 1084–1135

  55. [55]

    Lazar and L

    O. Lazar and L. Xue,Regularity results for a class of generalized surface quasi-geostrophic equations, J. Math. Pures Appl.130(2019), 200–250

  56. [56]

    Leray,Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace, Acta Math.63(1934), no

    J. Leray,Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace, Acta Math.63(1934), no. 1, 193–248

  57. [57]

    Lions,The Concentration-Compactness Principle in the Calculus of Variations

    P.-L. Lions,The Concentration-Compactness Principle in the Calculus of Variations. The limit case, Part 1, Revista Matemática Iberoamericana (1985), 145–201

  58. [58]

    The limit case, Part 2, Revista Matemática Iberoamericana1(1985), no

    ,The Concentration-Compactness Principle in the Calculus of Variations. The limit case, Part 2, Revista Matemática Iberoamericana1(1985), no. 2, 45–121 (eng)

  59. [59]

    A. J. Majda,Remarks on weak solutions for vortex sheets with a distinguished sign, Indiana University Mathematics Journal (1993), 921–939

  60. [60]

    A. J. Majda and A. L. Bertozzi,Vorticity and incompressible flow, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 27, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

  61. [61]

    Marchand,Existence and regularity of weak solutions to the quasi-geostrophic equations in the spacesLp or H−1 2, Comm

    F. Marchand,Existence and regularity of weak solutions to the quasi-geostrophic equations in the spacesLp or H−1 2, Comm. Math. Phys.277(2008), 45–67

  62. [62]

    Mengual and M

    F. Mengual and M. Solera,Sharp nonuniqueness for the forced 2D Navier-Stokes and dissipative SQG equations,

  63. [63]

    Preprint available at arXiv:2601.00331

  64. [64]

    Miao and L

    C. Miao and L. Xue,On the regularity of a class of generalized quasi-geostrophic equations, J. Differential Equations251(2011), no. 10, 2789–2821

  65. [65]

    Differential Equations252(2012), no

    ,Global well-posedness for a modified critical dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation, J. Differential Equations252(2012), no. 1, 792–818

  66. [66]

    Miura,Dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation for large initial data in the critical Sobolev space, Comm

    H. Miura,Dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation for large initial data in the critical Sobolev space, Comm. Math. Phys.267(2006), no. 1, 141–157

  67. [67]

    Onsager,Statistical hydrodynamics, Nuovo Cimento (9)6(1949), no

    L. Onsager,Statistical hydrodynamics, Nuovo Cimento (9)6(1949), no. Supplemento, 2 (Convegno Inter- nazionale di Meccanica Statistica), 279–287

  68. [68]

    Schochet,The weak vorticity formulation of the2-D Euler equations and concentration-cancellation, Comm

    S. Schochet,The weak vorticity formulation of the2-D Euler equations and concentration-cancellation, Comm. Partial Differential Equations20(1995), no. 5-6, 1077–1104

  69. [69]

    Shvydkoy,Convex integration for a class of active scalar equations, J

    R. Shvydkoy,Convex integration for a class of active scalar equations, J. Amer. Math. Soc.24(2011), no. 4, 1159–1174

  70. [70]

    Vecchi and S

    I. Vecchi and S. Wu,OnL1-vorticity for2-D incompressible flow, manuscripta mathematica78(1993), 403–412

  71. [71]

    Instability and non-uniqueness in the Cauchy problem for the Euler equations of an ideal incompressible fluid. Part I

    M. Vishik,Instability and non-uniqueness in the Cauchy problem for the Euler equations of an ideal incom- pressible fluid. Part I(2018). Preprint available at arXiv:1805.09426

  72. [72]

    Instability and non-uniqueness in the Cauchy problem for the Euler equations of an ideal incompressible fluid. Part II

    ,Instability and non-uniqueness in the Cauchy problem for the Euler equations of an ideal incompressible fluid. Part II(2018). Preprint available at arXiv:1805.09440

  73. [73]

    Zhao,An Onsager-type Theorem for general 2D Active Scalar Equations(2024)

    X. Zhao,An Onsager-type Theorem for general 2D Active Scalar Equations(2024). Preprint available at arXiv:2412.11094. 28 (L. De Rosa)Gran Sasso Science Institute, viale Francesco Crispi, 7, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy Email address:luigi.derosa@gssi.it (U.K.Yuzbasioglu)Gran Sasso Science Institute, viale Francesco Crispi, 7, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy Email address:...