pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19894 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Griffiths-like phase, spin-phonon coupling, and exchange-bias in the disordered double perovskite GdSrCoMnO₆

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Griffiths-like phasedouble perovskiteexchange biasspin-phonon couplingmagnetic disorderferromagnetic transitionGdSrCoMnO6magnetic inhomogeneity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Structural disorder in the double perovskite GdSrCoMnO6 produces a Griffiths-like magnetic phase above the ferromagnetic transition, spin-phonon coupling, and exchange bias at low temperatures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how random atomic arrangement affects magnetism and lattice vibrations in GdSrCoMnO6. Magnetization data reveal a ferromagnetic transition near 153 K followed by a downturn in inverse susceptibility that fits a Griffiths-like regime up to 172 K. Raman spectra show phonon frequencies shifting away from ordinary thermal behavior near the ordering temperature, indicating coupling between spins and the lattice. AC susceptibility measurements detect slow magnetic relaxation below 30 K, and field-cooled hysteresis loops display an exchange-bias shift that survives to 50 K. These features are traced to competing ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions that arise when mixed-valence cobalt and manganese ions occupy the B sites randomly.

Core claim

Structural disorder in GdSrCoMnO6 generates magnetic inhomogeneity through the random distribution of mixed-valence Co and Mn ions. This inhomogeneity produces a Griffiths-like phase between Tc approximately 153 K and TG approximately 172 K, spin-phonon coupling visible in Raman shifts, slow dynamics below a freezing temperature of 30 K, and an exchange-bias field reaching 379 Oe at 5 K that persists up to 50 K.

What carries the argument

Random distribution of mixed-valence Co and Mn ions on the perovskite B sites, which creates local competition between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic superexchange paths and thereby fragments the magnetic response into inhomogeneous clusters.

If this is right

  • Magnetic inhomogeneity persists from 153 K up to 172 K, extending the temperature window of short-range correlations.
  • Phonon modes soften or harden near the magnetic transition, demonstrating direct spin-lattice interaction.
  • Slow spin dynamics freeze below 30 K, consistent with glassy behavior induced by competing interactions.
  • Exchange bias appears below 50 K and reaches 379 Oe at 5 K, offering a low-temperature unidirectional anisotropy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Engineering controlled B-site disorder in related double perovskites could systematically tune the width of the Griffiths regime and the magnitude of exchange bias.
  • The observed spin-phonon coupling suggests that lattice vibrations may stabilize or destabilize the competing magnetic interactions, a link worth testing by isotopic substitution or pressure studies.
  • Materials with similar random mixed-valence distributions may exhibit analogous slow dynamics useful for studying glassy magnetism without chemical doping.

Load-bearing premise

The downturn in inverse susceptibility above the ferromagnetic transition temperature is produced by a Griffiths-like phase arising from disorder-induced magnetic clusters rather than by conventional short-range correlations or fitting choices.

What would settle it

High-resolution neutron scattering or field-dependent susceptibility data that show no evidence of magnetic clusters or altered critical exponents above 153 K would falsify the Griffiths-phase assignment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19894 by Debendra Prasad Panda, Diptikanta Swain, Gyanti Prakash Moharana, Hanuma Kumar Dara, S. N Sarangi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Powder X-ray diffraction pattern recorded at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Typical transmission electron microscope (TEM) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Temperature variation of (a) magnetization in the ZFC and FC processes under an applied field of 100 Oe, (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Best fit to 1/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Specific temperature-dependent Raman spectra of GSCM, (b) deconvolution of the Raman spectra and corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) ZFC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Schematic depiction of the inhomogeneous magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report structural, magnetic, and Raman studies of the disordered double perovskite GdSrCoMnO$_{6}$~(GSCM). DC magnetization shows a ferromagnetic transition at $T_{C} \approx 153$~K. The inverse susceptibility exhibits a downturn above $T_{C}$ and is consistent with a Griffiths-like regime extending up to $T_{G} \approx 172$~K. Raman measurements show a deviation of the phonon frequency from the anharmonic background near the magnetic-ordering region, consistent with spin-phonon coupling. AC susceptibility indicates slow magnetic dynamics below the freezing temperature $T_{f} \approx 30$~K. These results point to magnetic inhomogeneity generated by the random distribution of mixed-valence Co and Mn ions and by the resulting competition between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions. In the low-temperature regime, an exchange-bias effect is observed up to 50~K, with an exchange-bias magnitude $|H_{EB}| = 379$~Oe at 5~K. Structural disorder therefore plays an important role in the magnetic correlations, spin dynamics, and spin-lattice response of GSCM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports structural, DC/AC magnetization, and Raman studies on the disordered double perovskite GdSrCoMnO6. It identifies a ferromagnetic transition at Tc ≈ 153 K, a downturn in inverse susceptibility above Tc consistent with a Griffiths-like phase up to TG ≈ 172 K, spin-phonon coupling via phonon frequency deviations near Tc, slow dynamics with freezing at Tf ≈ 30 K, and exchange bias with |HEB| = 379 Oe at 5 K persisting to 50 K. These features are attributed to magnetic inhomogeneity arising from random mixed-valence Co/Mn distribution and competing FM/AFM interactions, with the conclusion that structural disorder plays a key role in the magnetic correlations, spin dynamics, and spin-lattice response.

Significance. If the interpretations are substantiated, this multi-technique experimental work adds a well-characterized example to the literature on disordered double perovskites, linking random cation distribution to Griffiths-like behavior, spin-phonon coupling, and exchange bias. The internal consistency across DC/AC magnetization and Raman data is a positive feature for such systems, potentially relevant for understanding competing interactions in perovskite oxides. Quantitative validation of the Griffiths regime and exchange-bias mechanism would increase the impact.

major comments (1)
  1. [Magnetic properties (inverse susceptibility analysis)] Magnetic properties section: The attribution of the inverse susceptibility downturn to a Griffiths-like phase (extending to TG ≈ 172 K) is presented qualitatively without a fit to the Griffiths power-law form, value of the exponent λ, or comparison to alternative short-range correlation models; this is central to the inhomogeneity claim and requires quantitative support to distinguish from fitting artifacts or other effects.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Results] Abstract and results: Reported transition temperatures and |HEB| lack associated uncertainties or error bars; inclusion of these (and raw data or fitting details in supplementary material) would improve reproducibility and assessment of precision.
  2. [Raman spectroscopy] Raman analysis: The modeling of the anharmonic phonon background and the criterion for identifying deviation near Tc should be specified with equations or fitting parameters for clarity.
  3. [Low-temperature magnetic properties] Exchange bias: Additional details on the field-cooling protocol, temperature dependence of HEB, and any training effects would better support the link to random Co/Mn mixed-valence distribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and for the constructive comment on the Griffiths-like phase analysis. We address the point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Magnetic properties (inverse susceptibility analysis)] Magnetic properties section: The attribution of the inverse susceptibility downturn to a Griffiths-like phase (extending to TG ≈ 172 K) is presented qualitatively without a fit to the Griffiths power-law form, value of the exponent λ, or comparison to alternative short-range correlation models; this is central to the inhomogeneity claim and requires quantitative support to distinguish from fitting artifacts or other effects.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative fit would provide stronger support for the Griffiths-like regime and help distinguish it from other possible short-range correlation effects. In the revised manuscript we will add a fit of the inverse susceptibility data between Tc and TG to the Griffiths power-law form χ^{-1} ∝ (T − TG)^{-(1−λ)}, report the extracted exponent λ, and include a brief discussion comparing this behavior to alternative models to substantiate the magnetic inhomogeneity interpretation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely experimental report with independent observations

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental study presenting DC/AC magnetization, structural, and Raman data on the disordered double perovskite GSCM. No derivation chain, mathematical model, or first-principles result is claimed. Reported features (TC ≈ 153 K ferromagnetic transition, inverse-susceptibility downturn to TG ≈ 172 K labeled Griffiths-like, Raman phonon deviation near TC, Tf ≈ 30 K freezing, and |HEB| = 379 Oe exchange bias) are direct measurements interpreted via standard phenomenology for mixed-valence disordered perovskites. No equations reduce a prediction to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The central attribution of magnetic inhomogeneity to random Co/Mn distribution follows from the data without circular reduction to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard interpretations of magnetic susceptibility data and Raman shifts in disordered systems; no new entities or ad-hoc parameters are introduced beyond measured transition temperatures.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Downturn in inverse susceptibility indicates Griffiths-like phase due to disorder
    Invoked to explain magnetic inhomogeneity without alternative models tested in the provided abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5534 in / 1251 out tokens · 48316 ms · 2026-05-10T01:41:49.501924+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tokura, Critical features of colossal magnetoresistive manganites, Rep

    Y. Tokura, Critical features of colossal magnetoresistive manganites, Rep. Prog. Phys.69, 797 (2006)

  2. [2]

    R. N. Mahato, K. Sethupathi, and V. Sankaranarayanan, Colossal magnetoresistance in the double perovskite ox- ide la2comno6, J. Appl. Phys.107, 09D714 (2010)

  3. [3]

    H. S. Nair, D. Swain, S. Adiga, C. Narayana, and S. Eliz- abeth, Griffiths phase-like behavior and spin-phonon cou- pling in double perovskite tb2nimno6, J. Appl. Phys.110, 123919 (2011)

  4. [4]

    R. B. Macedo Filho, A. P. Ayala, and C. W. d. A. Paschoal, Spin-phonon coupling in y2nimno6 double per- ovskite probed by raman spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 192902 (2013)

  5. [5]

    H. J. Zhao, W. Ren, Y. Yang, J.´I˜ niguez, X. M. Chen, and L. Bellaiche, Near room-temperature multiferroic materi- als with tunable ferromagnetic and electrical properties, Nat. Commun.5, 4021 (2014)

  6. [6]

    J. Su, Z. Yang, X. Lu, J. Zhang, L. Gu, C. Lu, Q. Li, J.-M. Liu, and J. Zhu, Magnetism-driven ferroelectricity in double perovskite y 2nimno6, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter- faces7, 13260 (2015)

  7. [7]

    Neenu Lekshmi and M

    P. Neenu Lekshmi and M. Raama Varma, Colossal magneto-dielectricity in la 2nimno6 probed by raman spectroscopy, inMater. Sci. Forum, Vol. 830–831 (Trans Tech Publ, 2015) pp. 513–517

  8. [8]

    J. Meng, X. Liu, X. Hao, L. Zhang, F. Yao, J. Meng, and H. Zhang, Microscopic mechanistic study on the multi- ferroic of r 2comno6/la2comno6 (r= ce, pr, nd, pm, sm, gd, tb, dy, ho, er, tm) by chemical and hydrostatic pres- sures: a first-principles calculation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.18, 23613 (2016)

  9. [9]

    L. Wang, W. Zhou, D. Wang, Q. Cao, Q. Xu, and Y. Du, Effect of metamagnetism on multiferroic property in dou- ble perovskite sm 2comno6, J. Appl. Phys.117, 17D914 (2015)

  10. [10]

    H. S. Nair, R. Pradheesh, Y. Xiao, D. Cherian, S. Elizabeth, T. Hansen, T. Chatterji, and T. Br¨ uckel, Magnetization-steps in y 2comno6 double perovskite: the role of antisite disorder, J. Appl. Phys.116, 123907 (2014)

  11. [11]

    J. K. Murthy, K. D. Chandrasekhar, S. Mahana, D. Top- wal, and A. Venimadhav, Giant magnetocaloric effect in gd2nimno6 and gd 2comno6 ferromagnetic insulators, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.48, 355001 (2015)

  12. [12]

    A. K. Singh, S. Chauhan, S. K. Srivastava, and R. Chan- dra, Influence of antisite disorders on the magnetic prop- erties of double perovskite nd 2nimno6, Solid State Com- mun.242, 74 (2016)

  13. [13]

    Nasir, S

    M. Nasir, S. Kumar, N. Patra, D. Bhattacharya, S. N. Jha, D. R. Basaula, S. Bhatt, M. Khan, S.-W. Liu, S. Bir- ing,et al., Role of antisite disorder, rare-earth size, and superexchange angle on band gap, curie temperature, and magnetization of r 2nimno6 double perovskites, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.1, 141 (2019)

  14. [14]

    M. Das, P. Sarkar, and P. Mandal, Non-griffiths-like clus- ter formation in the double-perovskite gd 2comno6: Evi- dence from critical behavior, Phys. Rev. B101, 144433 (2020)

  15. [15]

    M. B. Salamon, P. Lin, and S. H. Chun, Colossal mag- netoresistance is a griffiths singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 197203 (2002)

  16. [16]

    P. Tong, B. Kim, D. Kwon, T. Qian, S.-I. Lee, S. Cheong, and B. G. Kim, Griffiths phase and thermomagnetic ir- reversibility behavior in slightly electron-doped mangan- ites sm1−xcaxmno3 (0.80≤x≤0.92), Phys. Rev. B77, 184432 (2008)

  17. [17]

    Jiang, X

    W. Jiang, X. Zhou, G. Williams, Y. Mukovskii, and K. Glazyrin, Griffiths phase and critical behav- ior in single-crystal la 0.7ba0.3mno3: Phase diagram for la1−xbax mno3 (x≤0.33), Phys. Rev. B77, 064424 12 (2008)

  18. [18]

    Deisenhofer, D

    J. Deisenhofer, D. Braak, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, J. Hem- berger, R. Eremina, V. Ivanshin, A. Balbashov, G. Jug, A. Loidl, T. Kimura,et al., Observation of a griffiths phase in paramagnetic la 1−xsrxmno3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 257202 (2005)

  19. [19]

    C. L. Lu, X. Chen, S. Dong, K. F. Wang, H. L. Cai, J.-M. Liu, and Z. D. Zhang, Ru-doping-induced ferro- magnetism in charge-ordered la 0.4ca0.6mno3, Phys. Rev. B79, 245105 (2009)

  20. [20]

    T. Qian, P. Tong, B. Kim, S.-I. Lee, N. Shin, S. Park, and B. G. Kim, Enhancement of ferromagnetism by de- creasing tolerance factor in electron-doped manganites, Phys. Rev. B77, 094423 (2008)

  21. [21]

    R.-F. Yang, Y. Sun, W. He, Q.-A. Li, and Z.-H. Cheng, Observation of a griffiths-like phase in bilayered mangan- ites, Appl. Phys. Lett.90, 032502 (2007)

  22. [22]

    Shimada, S

    Y. Shimada, S. Miyasaka, R. Kumai, and Y. Tokura, Semiconducting ferromagnetic states in la 1−xsr1+xcoo4, Phys. Rev. B73, 134424 (2006)

  23. [23]

    W. Liu, L. Shi, S. Zhou, J. Zhao, Y. Li, and Y. Guo, Griffiths phase, spin-phonon coupling, and exchange bias effect in double perovskite Pr 2CoMnO6, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 193901 (2014)

  24. [24]

    A. K. Singh, P. Balasubramanian, A. Singh, M. Gupta, and R. Chandra, Structural transformation, griffiths phase and metal-insulator transition in polycrystalline nd2−xsrxnimno6 (x= 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.5 and 1) compound, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter30, 355401 (2018)

  25. [25]

    Salamon and S

    M. Salamon and S. Chun, Griffiths singularities and magnetoresistive manganites, Phys. Rev. B68, 014411 (2003)

  26. [26]

    A. H. Castro Neto, G. Castilla, and B. A. Jones, Non- fermi liquid behavior and griffiths phase inf-electron compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3531 (1998)

  27. [27]

    Y´ a˜ nez-Vilar, E

    S. Y´ a˜ nez-Vilar, E. D. Mun, V. S. Zapf, B. G. Ueland, J. S. Gardner, J. D. Thompson, J. Singleton, M. S´ anchez- And´ ujar, J. Mira, N. Biskup,et al., Multiferroic behavior in the double-perovskite lu 2mncoo6, Phys. Rev. B84, 134427 (2011)

  28. [28]

    Chikara, J

    S. Chikara, J. Singleton, J. Bowlan, D. A. Yarotski, N. Lee, H. Y. Choi, Y. J. Choi, and V. S. Zapf, Elec- tric polarization observed in single crystals of multiferroic lu2mncoo6, Phys. Rev. B93, 180405 (2016)

  29. [29]

    I. N. Bhatti, I. N. Bhatti, R. N. Mahato, and M. A. H. Ahsan, Magnetic behavior, griffiths phase and magneto- transport study in 3dbased nano-crystalline double per- ovskite pr2comno6, Phys. Lett. A383, 2326 (2019)

  30. [30]

    Choudhury, P

    D. Choudhury, P. Mandal, R. Mathieu, A. Hazarika, S. Rajan, A. Sundaresan, U. Waghmare, R. Knut, O. Karis, P. Nordblad,et al., Near-room-temperature colossal magnetodielectricity and multiglass properties in partially disordered la 2nimno6, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 127201 (2012)

  31. [31]

    Banerjee, J

    A. Banerjee, J. Sannigrahi, S. Giri, and S. Majumdar, Magnetization reversal and inverse exchange bias phe- nomenon in the ferrimagnetic polycrystalline compound er2comno6, Phys. Rev. B98, 104414 (2018)

  32. [32]

    Madhogaria, R

    R. Madhogaria, R. Das, E. Clements, V. Kalappat- til, M. Phan, H. Srikanth, N. Dang, D. Kozlenko, and N. Bingham, Evidence of long-range ferromagnetic or- der and spin frustration effects in the double perovskite la2comno6, Phys. Rev. B99, 104436 (2019)

  33. [33]

    Blasco, J

    J. Blasco, J. L. Garc´ ıa-Mu˜ noz, J. Garc´ ıa, J. Stankiewicz, G. Sub´ ıas, C. Ritter, and J. A. Rodr´ ıguez-Velamaz´ an, Evidence of large magneto-dielectric effect coupled to a metamagnetic transition in yb2comno6, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 012902 (2015)

  34. [34]

    J. Moon, M. Kim, D. Oh, J. Kim, H. Shin, Y. Choi, and N. Lee, Anisotropic magnetic properties and gi- ant rotating magnetocaloric effect in double-perovskite tb2comno6, Phys. Rev. B98, 174424 (2018)

  35. [35]

    Sahoo, Y

    R. Sahoo, Y. Takeuchi, A. Ohtomo, and Z. Hossain, Ex- change bias and spin glass states driven by antisite disor- der in the double perovskite compound lasrcofeo 6, Phys. Rev. B100, 214436 (2019)

  36. [36]

    Silva Jr, C

    R. Silva Jr, C. Santos, M. Escote, B. Costa, N. Moreno, S. Paz, R. Ang´ elica, and N. Ferreira, Griffiths-like phase, large magnetocaloric effect, and unconventional critical behavior in the ndsrcofeo 6 disordered double perovskite, Phys. Rev. B106, 134439 (2022)

  37. [37]

    R. S. Silva Jr, J. Gainza, C. dos Santos, J. E. F. Ro- drigues, C. Dejoie, Y. Huttel, N. Biskup, N. M. Nemes, J. L. Mart´ ınez, N. S. Ferreira,et al., Magnetoelastic cou- pling and cryogenic magnetocaloric effect in two-site dis- ordered GdSrCoFeO 6 double perovskite, Chem. Mater. 35, 2439 (2023)

  38. [38]

    J. Y. Moon, M. K. Kim, Y. J. Choi, and N. Lee, Giant anisotropic magnetocaloric effect in double-perovskite gd2comno6 single crystals, Sci. Rep.7, 16099 (2017)

  39. [39]

    Wu and C

    J. Wu and C. Leighton, Glassy ferromagnetism and mag- netic phase separation in la 1−xsrxcoo3, Phys. Rev. B67, 174408 (2003)

  40. [40]

    C. Bull, H. Playford, K. Knight, G. Stenning, and M. Tucker, Magnetic and structural phase diagram of the solid solution laco xmn1−xo3, Phys. Rev. B94, 014102 (2016)

  41. [41]

    J. A. Mydosh,Spin Glasses: An Experimental Introduc- tion(Taylor & Francis, London, 1993)

  42. [42]

    Souletie and J

    J. Souletie and J. Tholence, Critical slowing down in spin glasses and other glasses: Fulcher versus power law, Phys. Rev. B32, 516 (1985)

  43. [43]

    Iliev, M

    M. Iliev, M. Abrashev, A. Litvinchuk, V. Hadjiev, H. Guo, and A. Gupta, Raman spectroscopy of ordered double perovskite la2comno6 thin films, Phys. Rev. B75, 104118 (2007)

  44. [44]

    Truong, J

    K. Truong, J. Laverdi` ere, M. Singh, S. Jandl, and P. Fournier, Impact of co/mn cation ordering on phonon anomalies in la2comno6 double perovskites: Raman spec- troscopy, Phys. Rev. B76, 132413 (2007)

  45. [45]

    Kumar, S

    D. Kumar, S. Kumar, and V. G. Sathe, Spin-phonon coupling in ordered double perovskites a 2comno6 (a= la, pr, nd) probed by micro-raman spectroscopy, Solid State Commun.194, 59 (2014)

  46. [46]

    Silva, R

    R. Silva, R. Almeida, R. Moreira, R. Paniago, M. Rezende, and C. Paschoal, Vibrational properties and infrared dielectric features of gd 2comno6 and y 2comno6 double perovskites, Ceram. Int.45, 4756 (2019)

  47. [47]

    R. R. Das, P. N. Lekshmi, S. Das, and P. Santhosh, Com- peting short-range magnetic correlations, metamagnetic behavior and spin-phonon coupling in nd2comno6 double perovskite, J. Alloys Compd.773, 770 (2019)

  48. [48]

    Anshul, M

    A. Anshul, M. Kumar, and A. Raj, Raman and photolu- minescence spectral studies in double perovskite epitaxial nd2comno6 thin films deposited by pulse laser deposition, Optik212, 164749 (2020). 13

  49. [49]

    Balkanski, R

    M. Balkanski, R. Wallis, and E. Haro, Anharmonic effects in light scattering due to optical phonons in silicon, Phys. Rev. B28, 1928 (1983)

  50. [50]

    Granado, A

    E. Granado, A. Garc´ ıa, J. Sanjurjo, C. Rettori, I. Tor- riani, F. Prado, R. S´ anchez, A. Caneiro, and S. Os- eroff, Magnetic ordering effects in the raman spectra of La1−xMn1−xO3, Phys. Rev. B60, 11879 (1999)

  51. [51]

    Karmakar, S

    S. Karmakar, S. Taran, E. Bose, B. Chaudhuri, C. Sun, C. Huang, and H. Yang, Evidence of intrinsic exchange bias and its origin in spin-glass-like disordered l 0.5sr0.5 mno3 manganites (l= y, y0.5 sm0.5, and y0.5 la0.5), Phys. Rev. B77, 144409 (2008)

  52. [52]

    Paccard, C

    D. Paccard, C. Schlenker, O. Massenet, R. Mont- mory, and A. Yelon, A new property of ferromagnetic- antiferromagnetic coupling, Phys. Status Solidi B16, 301 (1966)

  53. [53]

    Stamps, Mechanisms for exchange bias, J

    R. Stamps, Mechanisms for exchange bias, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.33, R247 (2000)

  54. [54]

    Binek, Training of the exchange-bias effect: A simple analytic approach, Phys

    C. Binek, Training of the exchange-bias effect: A simple analytic approach, Phys. Rev. B70, 014421 (2004)

  55. [55]

    Mishra, F

    S. Mishra, F. Radu, H. D¨ urr, and W. Eberhardt, Training-induced positive exchange bias in nife/irmn bi- layers, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 177208 (2009)

  56. [56]

    Ventura, J

    J. Ventura, J. Araujo, J. Sousa, A. Veloso, and P. Freitas, Training effect in specular spin valves, Phys. Rev. B77, 184404 (2008)

  57. [57]

    Huang, J

    X. Huang, J. Ding, G. Zhang, Y. Hou, Y. Yao, and X. Li, Size-dependent exchange bias in la 0.25ca0.75mno3 nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. B78, 224408 (2008)

  58. [58]

    Moutis, C

    N. Moutis, C. Christides, I. Panagiotopoulos, and D. Niarchos, Exchange-coupling properties of la1−xcaxmno3 ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic multi- layers, Phys. Rev. B64, 094429 (2001)

  59. [59]

    Niebieskikwiat and M

    D. Niebieskikwiat and M. Salamon, Intrinsic interface exchange coupling of ferromagnetic nanodomains in a charge ordered manganite, Phys. Rev. B72, 174422 (2005)

  60. [60]

    S. Giri, M. Patra, and S. Majumdar, Exchange bias effect in alloys and compounds, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter23, 073201 (2011)