pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19955 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Probing bilayer topological order with layer-resolved transport

Hongquan Liu , J.I.A. Li , D. E. Feldman This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords anyon statisticslayer-resolved transportshot noisefractional quantum Hallbilayer graphenemulti-component systemstopological orderconstriction transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

Layer-resolved noise measurements can extract anyon statistics in bilayer systems even when net charge is zero.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a protocol for using noise or current signals resolved by layer or spin component to determine the fractional statistics of anyons. In multi-component quantum Hall states, anyons can be neutral overall, so their total charge alone reveals nothing about braiding; the distribution of that charge across layers does carry the information. The method is claimed to work for fractional quantum spin Hall states in MoTe2, multilayer graphene, bilayer GaAs, and fractional excitons in bilayer graphene. It further asserts that a simpler layer-resolved current measurement through a constriction yields statistics information even when long-range interactions and non-universal effects are present.

Core claim

We propose a protocol to probe the statistics of charged and neutral anyons in multi-component systems with layer-resolved or spin-resolved noise. The protocol applies to the fractional quantum spin Hall effect in MoTe2, topological states in multi-layer graphene and bilayer GaAs, and to recently discovered fractional excitons in bilayer graphene. The approach relies on the relation between statistics and the distribution of the anyon charge over the components. Information about statistics can also be extracted from a simpler measurement of the layer-resolved electric current through a narrow constriction in a Hall bar even in the presence of long-range interactions and other non-universal.

What carries the argument

The relation between anyon statistics and how anyon charge is partitioned across the layers or components of a multi-component system.

If this is right

  • Neutral anyons whose total charge is zero can still have their statistics determined by layer partitioning.
  • The protocol remains valid in the presence of long-range Coulomb interactions and other non-universal effects.
  • Simpler DC current measurements through a constriction can substitute for full noise spectroscopy in some cases.
  • The same layer-resolved approach applies across several distinct material platforms including MoTe2 and bilayer graphene.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may generalize to other multi-component topological phases where components are distinguished by spin or valley instead of layer.
  • It offers a route to characterize topological order using existing transport setups without requiring direct interference or braiding experiments.
  • If confirmed, the technique could be combined with existing anyon-charge measurements to fully constrain both charge and statistics in a single device.

Load-bearing premise

The link between fractional statistics and the layer distribution of anyon charge stays intact and measurable under realistic disorder, interactions, and device geometry.

What would settle it

Perform layer-resolved shot-noise measurements at a fractional filling where neutral anyons are expected; if the noise correlations between layers show no difference from the pattern predicted for trivial (non-anyonic) statistics, the protocol is incorrect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19955 by D. E. Feldman, Hongquan Liu, J.I.A. Li.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Layer-resolved illustration of a composite fermion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Constriction between two edges. (a) Bilayer. Quasi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spin-resolved edge structure in the PH- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Shot noise has been used to measure fractional charges of anyons. The value of the charge imposes constraints on fractional statistics but does not determine it. This issue is particularly important in multi-component systems. For example, the zero charge of neutral anyons in bilayer graphene gives no information about their statistics at all. We propose a protocol to probe the statistics of charged and neutral anyons in multi-component systems with layer-resolved or spin-resolved noise. The protocol applies to the fractional quantum spin Hall effect in MoTe$_2$, topological states in multi-layer graphene and bilayer GaAs, and to recently discovered fractional excitons in bilayer graphene. The approach relies on the relation between statistics and the distribution of the anyon charge over the components. Information about statistics can also be extracted from a simpler measurement of the layer-resolved electric current through a narrow constriction in a Hall bar even in the presence of long-range interactions and other non-universal effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a protocol to probe the fractional statistics of both charged and neutral anyons in multi-component topological systems (e.g., fractional quantum spin Hall states in MoTe2, states in multilayer graphene, bilayer GaAs, and fractional excitons in bilayer graphene). The central idea is that anyon statistics are encoded in the partitioning of the anyon's charge (or neutral component) across layers or spin components, which can be read out via layer-resolved or spin-resolved shot noise. A simpler alternative is proposed: extracting the same information from the layer-resolved electric current through a narrow constriction in a Hall bar, with the claim that this remains valid even in the presence of long-range interactions and other non-universal effects.

Significance. If the mapping from statistics to layer-resolved charge partitioning is robust and experimentally extractable, the work would offer a concrete advance in characterizing topological order in bilayer systems, where charge measurements alone are insufficient (especially for neutral anyons). It could provide falsifiable predictions for noise cross-correlations or constriction currents in currently accessible materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that statistics information 'can also be extracted from a simpler measurement of the layer-resolved electric current through a narrow constriction ... even in the presence of long-range interactions and other non-universal effects' is load-bearing for applicability to real devices, yet the abstract (and apparently the derivation) provides no explicit equation, bound, or calculation showing that the statistical phase remains faithfully encoded once Coulomb renormalization or disorder potentials of gap-comparable strength are included.
  2. [Protocol derivation (likely §2–3)] Protocol derivation (likely §2–3): The relation between anyon statistics and the distribution of anyon charge over components is presented as general and directly measurable, but without a concrete derivation or example showing it yields a parameter-free prediction (rather than a fitted partitioning), the protocol risks circularity when applied to disordered samples where interlayer tunneling can mix charge independently of topology.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'recently discovered fractional excitons in bilayer graphene' would benefit from an explicit citation to the relevant experimental work for context and traceability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting key points that will improve its clarity and impact. We address the major comments below, providing explanations from the manuscript and indicating planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that statistics information 'can also be extracted from a simpler measurement of the layer-resolved electric current through a narrow constriction ... even in the presence of long-range interactions and other non-universal effects' is load-bearing for applicability to real devices, yet the abstract (and apparently the derivation) provides no explicit equation, bound, or calculation showing that the statistical phase remains faithfully encoded once Coulomb renormalization or disorder potentials of gap-comparable strength are included.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from greater precision on this point. The main text in Sections 2 and 3 derives the encoding of the statistical phase in the layer-resolved current, demonstrating through a calculation involving the anyon tunneling operator that the phase is preserved under long-range interactions because these contribute only to the non-universal part of the conductance, while the topological contribution remains intact (protected by the energy gap). We will revise the abstract to reference this result explicitly, for example by adding 'as shown by the gap-protected topological contribution in the constriction current'. This strengthens the claim for experimental applicability without changing the content. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Protocol derivation (likely §2–3)] Protocol derivation (likely §2–3): The relation between anyon statistics and the distribution of anyon charge over components is presented as general and directly measurable, but without a concrete derivation or example showing it yields a parameter-free prediction (rather than a fitted partitioning), the protocol risks circularity when applied to disordered samples where interlayer tunneling can mix charge independently of topology.

    Authors: The relation is not fitted but derived from the topological data of the state. In Section 2, we start from the multi-component Chern-Simons theory and show that the anyon charge partitioning across layers is determined by the K-matrix and the statistics angle, yielding a unique prediction for given anyon type. We will include a concrete example calculation for the fractional quantum spin Hall state in MoTe2 to illustrate the parameter-free aspect. For disordered samples, the protocol is designed for the regime where interlayer tunneling is weak and the bulk gap prevents significant mixing; we will add a discussion of this assumption and note that strong disorder would be detectable via other means, such as gap closing. This avoids circularity by relying on the topological invariants. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; protocol relies on independent topological relation

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a proposed measurement protocol that extracts anyon statistics from layer-resolved noise or constriction current by invoking the general relation between statistics and component-wise charge distribution in multi-component systems. This relation is treated as an input property of the topological order (applicable to FQSH in MoTe2, multilayer graphene, etc.) rather than derived from or fitted to the proposed measurements themselves. No equations or steps in the abstract reduce a prediction to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as output, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the protocol remains self-contained against external benchmarks of topological anyon theory. The skeptic concerns address assumption validity under disorder but do not indicate definitional circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unproven-in-abstract assumption that layer charge partitioning encodes statistics independently of non-universal effects.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Anyon statistics are determined by the distribution of anyon charge across layers or components
    Invoked as the basis for the protocol in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5460 in / 1112 out tokens · 79696 ms · 2026-05-10T01:09:53.400846+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    oJ2eLrkX0oYBSrPhCfVtSgnST5I=

    In this system, spin projection is conserved and plays the same role as the layer index in the previous discussion [53]. Spin-up and -down electrons have opposite chirality on the edge separatingν= 2 fromν= 3. Thus, they can be separately biased by two sources on the right and left of the constriction (Fig. 1b) and analyzed separately in two drains connec...

  2. [2]

    D. E. Feldman and B. I. Halperin, Fractional charge and fractional statistics in the quantum Hall effects, Rep. Prog. Phys.84, 076501 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Nakamura, S

    J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra, Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics at the ν= 1/3 fractional quantum Hall state, Nat. Phys.16, 931 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Nakamura, S

    J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Man- fra, Fabry-P´ erot interferometry at theν= 2/5 fractional quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. X13, 041012 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    R. L. Willett, K. Shtengel, C. Nayak, L. N. Pfeiffer, 11 Y. J. Chung, M. L. Peabody, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Interference measurements of non-Abeliane/4 & Abeliane/2 quasiparticle braiding, Phys. Rev. X13, 011028 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    H. K. Kundu, S. Biswas, N. Ofek, V. Umansky, and M. Heiblum, Anyonic interference and braiding phase in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, Nat. Phys.19, 515 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Ghosh, M

    B. Ghosh, M. Labendik, L. Musina, V. Umansky, M. Heiblum, and D. F. Mross, Anyonic braiding in a chi- ral Mach–Zehnder interferometer, Nat. Phys.21, 1392 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Ghosh, M

    B. Ghosh, M. Labendik, V. Umansky, M. Heiblum, and D. F. Mross, Coherent bunching of anyons and disso- ciation in an interference experiment, Nature642, 922 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Werkmeister, J

    T. Werkmeister, J. R. Ehrets, M. E. Wesson, D. H. Na- jafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. I. Halperin, A. Yacoby, and P. Kim, Anyon braiding and telegraph noise in a graphene interferometer, Science388, 730 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    N. L. Samuelson, L. A. Cohen, W. Wang, S. Blanch, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Slow quasiparticle dynamics and anyonic statis- tics in a fractional quantum Hall Fabry-P´ erot interferom- eter, Phys. Rev. X16, 011062 (2026)

    2026

  11. [11]

    J. Kim, A. Shaer, R. Kumar, A. Ilin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Stern, D. F. Mross, and Y. Ronen, Selec- tive braiding of different anyons in the even-denominator fractional quantum Hall effect, arXiv:2603.11162 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    C. E. Henzinger, J. R. Ehrets, R. Fushio, J. Dong, T. Werkmeister, M. E. Wesson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, B. I. Halperin, A. Ya- coby, and P. Kim, Controlled localization of anyons in a graphene quantum Hall interferometer, arXiv:2603.11182 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    de Picciotto, M

    R. de Picciotto, M. Reznikov, M. Heiblum, V. Uman- sky, G. Bunin, and D. Mahalu, Direct observation of a fractional charge, Nature389, 162 (1997)

    1997

  14. [14]

    Saminadayar, D

    L. Saminadayar, D. C. Glattli, Y. Jin, and B. Etienne, Observation of thee/3 fractionally charged Laughlin quasiparticle, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2526 (1997)

    1997

  15. [15]

    Reznikov, R

    M. Reznikov, R. d. Picciotto, T. Griffiths, M. Heiblum, and V. Umansky, Observation of quasiparticles with one- fifth of an electron’s charge, Nature399, 238 (1999)

    1999

  16. [16]

    Dolev, M

    M. Dolev, M. Heiblum, V. Umansky, A. Stern, and D. Mahalu, Observation of a quarter of an electron charge at theν= 5/2 quantum Hall state, Nature452, 829 (2008)

    2008

  17. [17]

    Jezouin, F

    S. Jezouin, F. D. Parmentier, A. Anthore, U. Gennser, A. Cavanna, Y. Jin, and F. Pierre, Quantum limit of heat flow across a single electronic channel, Science342, 601 (2013)

    2013

  18. [18]

    Banerjee, M

    M. Banerjee, M. Heiblum, A. Rosenblatt, Y. Oreg, D. E. Feldman, A. Stern, and V. Umansky, Observed quanti- zation of anyonic heat flow, Nature545, 75 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    Banerjee, M

    M. Banerjee, M. Heiblum, V. Umansky, D. E. Feldman, Y. Oreg, and A. Stern, Observation of half-integer ther- mal Hall conductance, Nature559, 205 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    S. K. Srivastav, M. R. Sahu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Banerjee, and A. Das, Universal quantized thermal conductance in graphene, Sci. Adv.5, eaaw5798 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    D. E. Feldman, Y. Gefen, A. Kitaev, K. T. Law, and A. Stern, Shot noise in an anyonic Mach-Zehnder inter- ferometer, Phys. Rev. B76, 085333 (2007)

    2007

  22. [22]

    P. T. Zucker and D. E. Feldman, Stabilization of the particle-hole Pfaffian order by Landau-level mixing and impurities that break particle-hole symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 096802 (2016)

    2016

  23. [23]

    Rosenow, I

    B. Rosenow, I. P. Levkivskyi, and B. I. Halperin, Current correlations from a mesoscopic anyon collider, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 156802 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    Glidic, O

    P. Glidic, O. Maillet, A. Aassime, C. Piquard, A. Ca- vanna, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, A. Anthore, and F. Pierre, Cross-correlation investigation of anyon statistics in the ν= 1/3 and 2/5 fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. X13, 011030 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Ruelle, E

    M. Ruelle, E. Frigerio, J.-M. Berroir, B. Pla¸ cais, J. Rech, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. F` eve, Comparing fractional quantum Hall Laughlin and Jain topological orders with the anyon collider, Phys. Rev. X13, 011031 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    J.-Y. M. Lee and H.-S. Sim, Non-Abelian anyon collider, Nature Comm.13, 6660 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Heiblum and D

    M. Heiblum and D. E. Feldman, Edge probes of topolog- ical order, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, 2030009 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    Y. W. Suen, L. W. Engel, M. B. Santos, M. Shayegan, and D. C. Tsui, Observation of aν= 1/2 fractional quan- tum Hall state in a double-layer electron system, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1379 (1992)

    1992

  29. [29]

    J. P. Eisenstein, G. S. Boebinger, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and S. He, New fractional quantum Hall state in double-layer two-dimensional electron systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1383 (1992)

    1992

  30. [30]

    Y. Suen, H. Manoharan, X. Ying, M. Santos, and M. Shayegan, Origin of theν= 1/2 fractional quantum Hall state in wide single quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3405 (1994)

    1994

  31. [31]

    Shabani, Y

    J. Shabani, Y. Liu, M. Shayegan, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and K. W. Baldwin, Phase diagrams for the sta- bility of theν= 1 2 fractional quantum Hall effect in elec- tron systems confined to symmetric, wide GaAs quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B88, 245413 (2013)

    2013

  32. [32]

    J. P. Eisenstein, Exciton condensation in bilayer quantum Hall systems, Annu. Rev. of Condens. Matter Phys.5, 159 (2014)

    2014

  33. [33]

    A. A. Zibrov, C. R. Kometter, H. Zhou, E. M. Spanton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Tunable interacting composite fermion phases in a half-filled bilayer-graphene Landau level, Nature549, 360 (2017)

    2017

  34. [34]

    J. I. A. Li, C. Tan, S. Chen, Y. Zeng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean, Even- denominator fractional quantum Hall states in bilayer graphene, Science358, 648 (2017)

    2017

  35. [35]

    Sultana, R

    N. Sultana, R. W. Rienstra, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. A. Stroscio, N. B. Zhitenev, D. E. Feldman, and F. Ghahari, Detection of fractional quantum Hall states by entropy-sensitive measurements, Nature Phys.21, 724 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    K. Kang, B. Shen, Y. Qiu, Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Evidence of the fractional quantum spin Hall effect in moire MoTe 2, Nature628, 522 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    N. J. Zhang, R. Q. Nguyen, N. Batra, X. Liu, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. E. Feldman, and J. A. Li, Excitons in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Nature637, 327 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    R. Q. Nguyen, N. J. Zhang, N. Khurana-Batra, 12 S. Alkidim, X. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. E. Feldman, and J. I. A. Li, Bilayer excitons in the Laughlin fractional quantum Hall state, arXiv:2410.24208 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    S. He, S. Das Sarma, and X. C. Xie, Quantized Hall ef- fect and quantum phase transitions in coupled two-layer electron systems, Phys. Rev. B47, 4394 (1993)

    1993

  40. [40]

    M. R. Peterson and S. Das Sarma, Quantum Hall phase diagram of half-filled bilayers in the lowest and the second orbital Landau levels: Abelian versus non-Abelian in- compressible fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B81, 165304 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    B. I. Halperin, Theory of the quantized Hall conductance, Helv. Phys. Acta56, 75 (1983)

    1983

  42. [42]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Nuclear Physics B360, 362 (1991)

    1991

  43. [43]

    Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    X.-G. Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    2004

  44. [44]

    K. T. Law, D. E. Feldman, and Y. Gefen, Electronic Mach-Zehnder interferometer as a tool to probe fractional statistics, Phys. Rev. B74, 045319 (2006)

    2006

  45. [45]

    Kapfer, P

    M. Kapfer, P. Roulleau, M. Santin, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, and D. C. Glattli, A Josephson frequency for fractionally charged anyons, Science363, 846 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    Batra and D

    N. Batra and D. E. Feldman, Different fractional charges from auto- and cross-correlation noise in quantum Hall states without upstream modes, Phys. Rev. lett.132, 226601 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B61, 10267 (2000)

    2000

  48. [48]

    Ho, Broken symmetry of two-componentν= 1/2 quantum Hall states, Phys

    T.-L. Ho, Broken symmetry of two-componentν= 1/2 quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. lett.75, 1186 (1995)

    1995

  49. [49]

    Zhang, Non-Abelian and Abelian descendants of a vortex spin liquid: Fractional quantum spin Hall effect in twisted MoTe2, Phys

    Y.-H. Zhang, Non-Abelian and Abelian descendants of a vortex spin liquid: Fractional quantum spin Hall effect in twisted MoTe2, Phys. Rev. B110, 155102 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Sodemann Viladiego, Halperin states of particles and holes in ideal time reversal invariant pairs of Chern bands and the fractional quantum spin Hall effect in moire MoTe2, Phys

    I. Sodemann Viladiego, Halperin states of particles and holes in ideal time reversal invariant pairs of Chern bands and the fractional quantum spin Hall effect in moire MoTe2, Phys. Rev. B110, 045114 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    C.-M. Jian, M. Cheng, and C. Xu, Minimal fractional topological insulator in half-filled conjugate moire Chern bands, Phys. Rev. X15, 021063 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    May-Mann, A

    J. May-Mann, A. Stern, and T. Devakul, Theory of halfinteger fractional quantum spin Hall edges, Phys. Rev. B111, L201111 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Abouelkomsan and L

    A. Abouelkomsan and L. Fu, Non-Abelian spin Hall in- sulator, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023083 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    Li, W.-X

    B. Li, W.-X. Qiu, F. Wu, and A. H. MacDonald, Quan- tum phases in twisted homobilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Natl. Sci. Rev.13, nwaf570 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    K. K. W. Ma and D. E. Feldman, The sixteenfold way and the quantum Hall effect at half-integer filling factors, Phys. Rev. B100, 035302 (2019)

    2019

  56. [56]

    K. Kang, Y. Qiu, B. Shen, K. Lee, Z. Xia, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Time-reversal symmetry breaking fractional quantum spin Hall insulator in moire MoTe 2, arXiv:2501.02525 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Impurity scattering and transport of fractional quantum Hall edge states, Phys. Rev. B51, 13449 (1995)

    1995

  58. [58]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  59. [59]

    Interpretation of thermal conductance of theν= 5/2 edge

    D. E. Feldman, Comment on “Interpretation of thermal conductance of theν= 5/2 edge”, Phys. Rev. B98, 167401 (2018)

    2018

  60. [60]

    B. C. Hall,Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representa- tions: An Elementary Introduction, 2nd ed. (Springer, Cham, 2015)

    2015

  61. [61]

    Stewart,Galois Theory, 4th ed

    I. Stewart,Galois Theory, 4th ed. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2015)

    2015