pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20247 · v3 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

J/psi Photoproduction from Threshold to HERA: Leading-Twist Convolution, Small-x Pathology, and Eikonal Unitarization

Arkadiy I. Syamtomov
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords J/psi photoproductionOPE sum ruleseikonal unitarizationsmall-x singularitythreshold behaviorHERA datavector meson dominancedispersion relations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Minimal eikonal unitarization reconciles leading-twist J/ψ photoproduction with data from threshold to HERA energies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines J/ψ photoproduction on nucleons from low to high energies using OPE sum rules and dispersion relations with updated gluon distributions. It finds that the direct convolution approach matches near-threshold data from experiments like GlueX and Cornell, but overpredicts the cross section at high energies measured at HERA by a large factor due to the small-x behavior of modern PDFs. To address this, the authors introduce a minimal eikonal unitarization of the amplitude using an energy-dependent saturation scale adjusted to fit HERA data. This adjustment aligns predictions across the full energy range without altering the good description at threshold. Near threshold, the real part of the amplitude, anchored by an OPE subtraction constant of about 36-39 GeV^{-2}, dominates the cross section.

Core claim

The direct convolution of leading-twist amplitudes with modern small-x singular PDFs describes threshold data but overshoots HERA measurements at W greater than or equal to 90 GeV by a factor of 7-12. A minimal eikonal unitarization with an energy-dependent saturation scale fitted to HERA data resolves this discrepancy over the full W range while preserving the threshold description. Near threshold the dispersive real part dominates, fixed by the OPE subtraction constant M_ψN(0) approximately 36-39 GeV^{-2}.

What carries the argument

The minimal eikonal unitarization factor applied to the leading-twist convolution amplitude, incorporating an energy-dependent saturation scale and the OPE subtraction constant for the real part.

If this is right

  • The threshold cross section remains well described by the unmodified OPE-based calculation for all four PDF sets tested.
  • High-energy behavior is tamed to match HERA data without changing low-energy parameters or the threshold exponent.
  • The subtraction constant M_ψN(0) is constrained to the range 36-39 GeV^{-2} by near-threshold data.
  • The small-x pathology affecting moment-based reconstructions is sidestepped by direct convolution.
  • The unitarized model supplies a single consistent description from threshold through HERA energies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar unitarization adjustments may be needed for photoproduction of other vector mesons where leading-twist convolutions face small-x growth.
  • Measurements at future facilities probing the transition region between threshold and HERA energies could further pin down the energy dependence of the saturation scale.
  • The dominance of the dispersive real part near threshold implies that dispersion relations and subtraction constants are essential for reliable low-energy predictions in related processes.

Load-bearing premise

That the leading-twist OPE framework combined with a minimal eikonal factor remains valid near threshold and that fitting the saturation scale to HERA data introduces no uncontrolled systematics into the low-energy regime.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the J/ψ photoproduction cross section at intermediate energies around 20-50 GeV, or an independent extraction of the real part of the amplitude or the subtraction constant M_ψN(0), would test whether the unitarized predictions hold consistently.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20247 by Arkadiy I. Syamtomov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Forward differential photoproduction cross secti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Elastic photoproduction cross section σ elastic γN→J/ψ p(W) for the same theoretical curves as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Imaginary (upper) and real (lower) parts of the for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ratio ρ(W) = Re MψN /Im MψN in the threshold region W = 4.0–5.0 GeV, computed via the direct convolution for the four modern PDF families (solid curves) and the 1999 scaling PDF xg = 2.5(1 − x) 4 (black dashed). The ratio falls smoothly from ρ ≃ 30–40 at threshold, with no singularities. The 1999 curve lies above the modern-PDF band owing to its larger OPE subtraction constant M(0) = 72 (vs. 36–39 for mode… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Threshold zoom (W = 4.0–8.0 GeV). Upper panel: forward differential cross section with GlueX, Camerini and Gittelman data overlaid; the black dashed curve shows the 1999 scaling-PDF result [5], normalized independently to the same threshold data. Lower panel: Re M (solid) and Im M (dashed) in the threshold region, showing directly that Re M is large and finite near threshold while Im M rises from zero — th… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Eikonal unitarization of the leading-twist convo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We revisit near-threshold $J/\psi$ photoproduction on the nucleon within the OPE sum-rule framework combined with vector-meson dominance and dispersion relations, using modern NNLO gluon distributions (ABMP16, MSHT20, CT18, NNPDF4.0). Two complementary pathologies are identified. The moment-based cross-section reconstruction fails near threshold: the small-$x$ singularity of modern PDFs distorts the Mellin moment hierarchy and drives the threshold exponent to $a\simeq 16$-$20$, compared to $a\simeq 1$-$2$ for the 1999 scaling parametrization. The direct convolution approach avoids this artefact and describes the threshold data (GlueX, Cornell) for all four PDF sets, but overshoots HERA measurements at $W\gtrsim 90$~GeV by a factor $7$-$12$ - an intrinsic feature of leading-twist convolution with any small-$x$-singular PDF, already noted in the 1999 analysis. A minimal eikonal unitarization of the amplitude, with an energy-dependent saturation scale fitted to HERA data, reconciles the convolution with the full $W$-range measurements while leaving the threshold description unchanged. Near threshold the dispersive real part dominates the cross section, anchored by the OPE subtraction constant $M_{\psi N}(0)\simeq 36$-$39$~GeV$^{-2}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper revisits near-threshold J/ψ photoproduction using the OPE sum-rule framework with vector-meson dominance and dispersion relations, applied to four modern NNLO gluon PDFs (ABMP16, MSHT20, CT18, NNPDF4.0). It identifies a pathology in moment-based cross-section reconstruction arising from small-x singularities in the PDFs, which distorts the Mellin moment hierarchy and yields an unphysical threshold exponent a ≃ 16-20. The direct convolution approach is shown to describe GlueX and Cornell threshold data for all PDF sets, but overshoots HERA measurements at W ≳ 90 GeV by a factor 7-12. A minimal eikonal unitarization of the amplitude, employing an energy-dependent saturation scale fitted to HERA data, is proposed to reconcile the convolution with the full W range while leaving the threshold description unchanged; near threshold the dispersive real part is claimed to dominate, anchored by the OPE subtraction constant M_ψN(0) ≃ 36-39 GeV^{-2}.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would provide a unified leading-twist description of J/ψ photoproduction spanning threshold to HERA kinematics, while highlighting intrinsic limitations of pure convolution with small-x singular PDFs and the necessity of unitarization at high energies. Credit is due for the systematic comparison across four contemporary PDF sets, the clear identification of the moment-reconstruction artefact, and the emphasis on the dispersive real part near threshold. The approach could inform future studies of heavy-quarkonium production if the unitarization procedure is shown to be robust under extrapolation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'a minimal eikonal unitarization ... reconciles the convolution with the full W-range measurements while leaving the threshold description unchanged' is load-bearing yet unsupported by explicit verification. The energy-dependent saturation scale is fitted exclusively to HERA data at W ≳ 90 GeV; without the functional form of Q_s(W) or Q_s(x), and without a numerical evaluation demonstrating that the resulting eikonal suppression factor remains within a few percent of unity at W ≈ 4.5 GeV, the assertion that threshold predictions (GlueX/Cornell) are unaltered cannot be assessed. This directly affects the reconciliation across the full energy range.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No quantitative measures of agreement are provided for either the threshold description or the high-energy overshoot. The statements that the direct convolution 'describes the threshold data for all four PDF sets' and overshoots HERA 'by a factor 7-12' lack χ² values, error bands, or PDF-uncertainty envelopes, making it impossible to judge whether the agreement is statistically meaningful or merely qualitative.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'the 1999 scaling parametrization' and 'the 1999 analysis' without a citation; the relevant reference should be supplied in the main text for traceability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The two major comments identify areas where the presentation of our results on eikonal unitarization and data agreement can be strengthened. We address each point below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'a minimal eikonal unitarization ... reconciles the convolution with the full W-range measurements while leaving the threshold description unchanged' is load-bearing yet unsupported by explicit verification. The energy-dependent saturation scale is fitted exclusively to HERA data at W ≳ 90 GeV; without the functional form of Q_s(W) or Q_s(x), and without a numerical evaluation demonstrating that the resulting eikonal suppression factor remains within a few percent of unity at W ≈ 4.5 GeV, the assertion that threshold predictions (GlueX/Cornell) are unaltered cannot be assessed. This directly affects the reconciliation across the full energy range.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the central claim. The functional form of the saturation scale Q_s(W) (a power-law parametrization fitted to HERA) is given in the unitarization section of the main text, but we will add it explicitly to the abstract and include a short numerical evaluation (or inset plot) showing that the eikonal suppression factor equals 1.00 within 2% at W ≈ 4.5 GeV for the fitted parameters. This confirms that the threshold predictions remain unchanged while the high-energy suppression reconciles the data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No quantitative measures of agreement are provided for either the threshold description or the high-energy overshoot. The statements that the direct convolution 'describes the threshold data for all four PDF sets' and overshoots HERA 'by a factor 7-12' lack χ² values, error bands, or PDF-uncertainty envelopes, making it impossible to judge whether the agreement is statistically meaningful or merely qualitative.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative metrics would allow a more precise assessment. The manuscript currently presents visual comparisons with data and PDF variations in the figures. In the revision we will add χ²/dof values for the threshold region (GlueX + Cornell) for each of the four PDF sets, report the overshoot factor at W ≈ 100 GeV together with its PDF-uncertainty range, and include PDF uncertainty bands on the relevant cross-section plots. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Saturation scale fitted to HERA data makes high-W reconciliation by construction; threshold invariance asserted without explicit low-W check

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "A minimal eikonal unitarization of the amplitude, with an energy-dependent saturation scale fitted to HERA data, reconciles the convolution with the full W-range measurements while leaving the threshold description unchanged."

    The saturation scale is fitted exclusively to the HERA high-W data that exhibit the 7-12 overshoot, so the reconciliation at high W is achieved by construction. The additional assertion that the threshold (low-W) description remains unchanged is not an independent prediction but depends on the (unspecified) functional form of the energy-dependent scale; without an explicit parametrization or demonstration that the eikonal factor stays ≈1 near threshold, this part of the central claim reduces to an unverified modeling choice rather than a derived result.

full rationale

The derivation identifies an overshoot of the direct convolution at W ≳ 90 GeV (factor 7-12, intrinsic to leading-twist with small-x PDFs) and introduces a minimal eikonal unitarization whose energy-dependent saturation scale is fitted to HERA data to remove it. This renders the high-energy agreement tautological to the fit rather than an independent prediction. The claim that the same construction leaves the threshold description (driven by dispersive real part and M_ψN(0) ≃ 36-39 GeV^{-2}) unchanged is an extrapolation whose validity hinges on the functional form of Q_s(W) or Q_s(x) being negligible at W ≈ 4.5 GeV; the abstract asserts this without providing the parametrization or numerical verification. The core OPE + VMD + dispersion threshold calculation itself remains independent of the high-W fit, so the circularity is partial and localized to the unitarization step rather than total.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of leading-twist OPE at threshold, the applicability of vector-meson dominance, the dispersion relation used to obtain the real part, and the minimal eikonal form whose only new ingredient is a fitted saturation scale.

free parameters (2)
  • energy-dependent saturation scale
    Fitted to HERA data to remove the high-energy overshoot of the leading-twist convolution.
  • OPE subtraction constant M_ψN(0)
    Anchors the dispersive real part near threshold; value 36-39 GeV^{-2} extracted from the framework.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Leading-twist OPE sum rules combined with vector-meson dominance and dispersion relations remain valid near threshold.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the calculational framework.
  • ad hoc to paper The minimal eikonal unitarization does not modify the near-threshold amplitude.
    Stated as leaving the threshold description unchanged after fitting at high W.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5574 in / 1642 out tokens · 59893 ms · 2026-05-10T00:25:45.845384+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Target-Mass Corrections in the OPE Sum-Rule Approach to Quarkonium-Nucleon Interactions with Global-Fit PDFs: an $x$-Resolved Analysis

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    An x-resolved analysis shows that target-mass corrections in quarkonium-nucleon sum rules depend on both kinematic factors and how modern PDFs distribute gluon support across x regions, with cross sections computed vi...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Short-distance analysis for heavy-quark systems. I. Diagrammatics

    M. E. Peskin, "Short-distance analysis for heavy-quark systems. I. Diagrammatics", Nucl. Phys. B 156 (1979) 365–390, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90199-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90199-8 1979

  2. [2]

    Short-distance analysis for heavy-quark systems. II. Applications

    G. Bhanot and M. E. Peskin, "Short-distance analysis for heavy-quark systems. II. Applications", Nucl. Phys. B 156 (1979) 391–416, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90200- 1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90200- 1979

  3. [3]

    Quarkonium interactions in had ronic matter

    D. Kharzeev and H. Satz, "Quarkonium interactions in had ronic matter", Phys. Lett. B 334 (1994) 155–162, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90604-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90604-1 1994

  4. [4]

    On th e sum rule ap- proach to quarkonium-hadron interactions

    D. Kharzeev, H. Satz, A. Syamtomov and G. Zinovjev, "On th e sum rule ap- proach to quarkonium-hadron interactions", Phys. Lett. B 389 (1996) 595–599, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01311-7, arXiv:hep-ph/9605 448

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(96)01311-7 1996

  5. [5]

    J/ ψ -Photoproduction and the Gluon Structure of the Nucleon

    D. Kharzeev, H. Satz, A. Syamtomov and G. Zinovjev, "J/ ψ -Photoproduction and the Gluon Structure of the Nucleon", Eur. Phys. J. C 9 (1999) 459 [arXiv:hep- ph/9901375]

    work page arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    Target-Mass Corrections in the OPE Sum-Rule Approach to Quarkonium-Nucleon Interactions with Global-Fit PDFs: an $x$-Resolved Analysis

    A. Syamtomov, "Target-Mass Corrections in the OPE Sum-R ule Approach to Quarkonium–Nucleon Interactions with Global-Fit PDFs: an x-Resolved Analysis", arXiv:2604.20217 [hep-ph] (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Operator Product Expansion and Quark-Hadr on Duality: Facts and Riddles

    R. Hofmann, "Operator Product Expansion and Quark-Hadr on Duality: Facts and Riddles", arXiv:hep-ph/0312130

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    He avy-quarkonium hadron cross section in QCD at leading twist

    F. Arleo, P.-B. Gossiaux, T. Gousset and J. Aichelin, "He avy-quarkonium hadron cross section in QCD at leading twist", Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 014005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.014005, arXiv:hep-ph/0102095 . 14

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.014005 2002

  9. [9]

    Charmonium and Gluons: Basic Experimental Facts and Theoretical Introduction

    V. A. Novikov, L. B. Okun, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, M. B. Voloshin and V. I. Zakharov, "Charmonium and Gluons: Basic Experimental Facts and Theoretical Introduction", Phys. Rept. 41 (1978) 1–133, doi:10.1016/0370-1573(78)90120-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(78)90120-5 1978

  10. [10]

    Are All Hadrons Alike?

    V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Za kharov, "Are All Hadrons Alike?", Nucl. Phys. B 191 (1981) 301–369, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90331-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90331-8 1981

  11. [11]

    Parton di stributions: A New global analysis

    A. D. Martin, R. G. Roberts and W. J. Stirling, "Parton di stributions: A New global analysis", Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10 (1995) 2885–2932, doi:10.1142/S0217751X95001361

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x95001361 1995

  12. [12]

    The path to proton structure at 1% accuracy

    R. D. Ball et al. [NNPDF Collaboration], "The path to proton structure at 1% accuracy", Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 428, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10328-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10328-5 2022

  13. [13]

    Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed target data: MSHT20 PDFs

    S. Bailey, T. Cridge, L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin an d R. S. Thorne, "Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed-target dat a: MSHT20 PDFs", Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 341, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09057-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09057-0 2021

  14. [14]

    Hou, et al., New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC, Phys

    T. J. Hou et al. , "New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC", Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 014013, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014013

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.014013 2021

  15. [15]

    Parton distribution functions,α s, and heavy-quark masses for LHC Run II

    S. Alekhin, J. Blümlein, S. Moch and R. Placakyte, "Part on distribution functions, αs, and heavy-quark masses for LHC Run II", Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 014011, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.014011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.014011 2017

  16. [16]

    Buckley, J

    A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordström, B. Page , M. Rüfenacht, M. Schön- herr and G. Watt, "LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC p recision era", Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3318-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3318-8 2015

  17. [17]

    More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions

    A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, "Exclusive vector phot oproduction: Confir- mation of Regge theory", Phys. Lett. B 348 (1995) 213–218, doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(95)00102-L

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1995

  18. [18]

    Photoproduction of the ψ Particles

    U. Camerini et al. , "Photoproduction of the ψ Particles", Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975) 483–486, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.483

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.35.483 1975

  19. [19]

    Photoproduction of the ψ (3095) Meson at 11 GeV to 20 GeV

    B. Gittelman et al. , "Photoproduction of the ψ (3095) Meson at 11 GeV to 20 GeV", Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975) 1616–1619, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1616

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.35.1616 1975

  20. [20]

    Ali, et al., First Measurement of Near-Threshold J/ψ Exclusive Photoproduction off the Proton, Phys

    A. Ali et al. [GlueX Collaboration], "First Measurement of Near-Thresh old J/ψ Exclusive Photoproduction off the Proton", Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 072001, arXiv:1905.10811 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Measurement of the J/ψ photoproduction cross section over the full near-threshold kinematic regio n

    S. Adhikari et al. [GlueX Collaboration], "Measurement of the J/ψ photoproduction cross section over the full near-threshold kinematic regio n", Phys. Rev. C 108 (2023) 025201, arXiv:2304.03845 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Chatagnon et al

    P. Chatagnon et al. [CLAS12 Collaboration], "Measurement of the near-thresho ld J/ψ photoproduction cross section with the CLAS12 experiment" , arXiv:2602.22128 [hep-ex], JLAB-PHY-26-4605. 15

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Chekanov et al., Exclusive photoproduction of J/ψ mesons at HERA, Eur

    S. Chekanov et al. [ZEUS Collaboration], "Exclusive photoproduction of J/ψ mesons at HERA", Eur. Phys. J. C 24 (2002) 345–360, arXiv:hep-ex/0201043

    work page arXiv 2002

  24. [24]

    Elastic J/ψ production at HERA

    A. Aktas et al. [H1 Collaboration], "Elastic J/ψ production at HERA", Eur. Phys. J. C 46 (2006) 585–603, arXiv:hep-ex/0510016

    work page arXiv 2006

  25. [25]

    Alexa et al., Elastic and Proton-Dissociative Photoproduction ofJ/ψ Mesons at HERA, Eur

    C. Alexa et al. [H1 Collaboration], "Elastic and proton-dissociative pho toproduction ofJ/ψ mesons at HERA", Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2466, arXiv:1304.5162 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    J/ψ photoproduction from 60 to 300 GeV/ c

    M. E. Binkley et al. , "J/ψ photoproduction from 60 to 300 GeV/ c", Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 73–76

    1982

  27. [27]

    Deep inelastic scat- tering as a probe of entanglement: Confronting experi- mental data,

    D. Kharzeev, “Mass radius of the proton”, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 054015, arXiv:2102.09773 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Diffractive photoproduction of J/ψ and Υ using holo- graphic QCD: gravitational form factors and GPD of gluons in the proton

    K. A. Mamo and I. Zahed, “Diffractive photoproduction of J/ψ and Υ using holo- graphic QCD: gravitational form factors and GPD of gluons in the proton”, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 086003, arXiv:1910.04707 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Deciphering the Mechanism of Near-Thresho ld J/ψ Photoproduc- tion

    M. L. Du, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, A . Nefediev and I. Strakovsky, “Deciphering the Mechanism of Near-Thresho ld J/ψ Photoproduc- tion”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 1053, arXiv:2009.08345 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Small- x Behavior and Parton Saturation: A QCD Model

    A. H. Mueller, “Small- x Behavior and Parton Saturation: A QCD Model”, Nucl. Phys. B 335 (1990) 115–137, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90173-B

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90173-b 1990

  31. [31]

    Hard Nuclear Processes a nd Microscopic Nuclear Structure

    L. Frankfurt and M. Strikman, “Hard Nuclear Processes a nd Microscopic Nuclear Structure”, Phys. Rep. 160 (1988) 235–427, doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90179-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90179-2 1988

  32. [32]

    Saturation effects in deep inelastic scattering at lowQ2 and its implications on diffraction

    K. Golec-Biernat and M. Wüsthoff, “Saturation effects in deep inelastic scattering at lowQ2 and its implications on diffraction”, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 014017, arXiv:hep- ph/9807596

    work page arXiv 1999

  33. [33]

    High Energy Implications of Extended Uni tarity

    V. A. Petrov, “High Energy Implications of Extended Uni tarity”, IHEP Preprint 95-96 (Protvino, 1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9602192

    work page arXiv 1995

  34. [34]

    Regge–Eikonal Approac h and Its Off-Shell Ex- tension Versus Experimental Data

    V. A. Petrov and A. V. Prokudin, “Regge–Eikonal Approac h and Its Off-Shell Ex- tension Versus Experimental Data”, IHEP Protvino (1999), a rXiv:hep-ph/9912245. 16 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 I m M ψN 1e8 10 1 10 2 W [GeV] 0 1 2 3 4 5 Re M ψN 1e7 Forward J / ψ -- N amp itude: I m M and Re M vs W ABMP16 MSHT20 CT18 NNPDF4.0 Figure 3: Imaginary (upper) an...

    work page arXiv 1999