pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20309 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Multilayer Laue Lenses for Enhanced Spatial Resolution in Dark-Field X-ray Microscopy

Steffen Staeck , Can Yildirim , Raquel Rodriguez-Lamas , Thomas Dufrane , Carsten Detlefs , Nis Gellert , Antonella Gayoso Padula , Henning Friis Poulsen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords multilayer Laue lensesdark-field X-ray microscopyspatial resolutionX-ray opticsmodulation transfer functioncompound refractive lensesorientation mapping
0
0 comments X

The pith

Crossed multilayer Laue lenses deliver 56 nm spatial resolution in dark-field X-ray microscopy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates the use of a crossed pair of multilayer Laue lenses as the objective in dark-field X-ray microscopy. In a demonstration at the ID03 beamline, this setup reached 56 nm resolution according to the 10 percent modulation transfer function criterion, more than three times better than with a compound refractive lens. The efficiency is 26.7 percent, which broadens the range of samples that can be examined in both bulk and near-surface configurations. The larger numerical aperture of the multilayer Laue lens objective also improves reciprocal space resolution, supporting faster orientation mapping and more effective tomographic reconstructions. Secondary peaks in the pupil are suppressed, which simplifies interpretation of the images.

Core claim

A crossed pair of flat Mo-Si multilayer Laue lenses with 50 by 50 micrometer physical aperture and 14.25 mm focal length at 19 keV functions as an objective for dark-field X-ray microscopy. This yields 56 nm spatial resolution in bright-field mode and similar resolution in dark-field mode, exceeding compound refractive lens performance by more than a factor of three at 26.7 percent efficiency. The numerical aperture is three times larger, so reciprocal space resolution is correspondingly improved while the pupil function remains free of strong secondary peaks.

What carries the argument

Crossed pair of multilayer Laue lenses used as the imaging objective, with the measured modulation transfer function setting the spatial resolution limit.

If this is right

  • Spatial resolution in bright-field and dark-field modes improves by more than a factor of three relative to compound refractive lens objectives.
  • Reciprocal space resolution improves because the numerical aperture is three times larger, enabling faster orientation mapping.
  • Tomographic reconstruction algorithms gain better options from the higher resolution data.
  • Suppressed secondary peaks in the objective pupil simplify both data interpretation and forward simulations.
  • Efficiency of 26.7 percent expands dark-field X-ray microscopy to a wider set of bulk and near-surface studies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could extend dark-field X-ray microscopy to nanostructured materials where 50 nm features determine functional properties.
  • Applications to through-silicon via devices indicate possible use in semiconductor process metrology.
  • Energy-dependent pupil variations suggest that energy-scanning experiments will require careful calibration of the objective response.

Load-bearing premise

The modulation transfer function measured in the specific demonstration setup accurately captures the resolution limit that would apply in general dark-field X-ray microscopy without dominant contributions from beam properties or sample scattering.

What would settle it

Measuring the modulation transfer function at a different beamline or with samples that produce stronger scattering would show whether 56 nm resolution is maintained or drops due to external factors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20309 by Antonella Gayoso Padula, Can Yildirim, Carsten Detlefs, Henning Friis Poulsen, Nis Gellert, Raquel Rodriguez-Lamas, Steffen Staeck, Thomas Dufrane.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Imaging set-up. MLL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Characterization of the spatial resolution of two objectives. a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Components of the reciprocal space resolution function of a Si (220) reflection at 19 keV, shown in dimensionless (strain) units. a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. KEL2 device imaged in DFXM reflection geometry with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Characterization of spatial resolution for different positions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. a) Flat field within a region of interest of 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Four different images acquired during a rocking scan recorded in dark-field mode with a Si wafer as the sample. The position on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. a) Line profiles, derived from the images shown in Fig. 7, for different rocking angles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Characterization of the spatial variation of the rolling component of the reciprocal space resolution function. a) Identification of four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce the use of a crossed pair of Multilayer Laue Lenses (MLLs) as an objective in Dark-Field X-ray Microscopy (DFXM). In a demonstration experiment at the ID03 beamline at ESRF, two flat Mo-Si MLLs were used, with a physical aperture of 50 x 50 $\mathrm{\mu m^2}$ and a focal length of 14.25 mm at 19 keV. Applying a 10 % criterion to the Modulation Transfer Functions (MTFs) acquired, a spatial resolution of 56 nm is obtained in bright-field mode -- more than three times better than with a compound refractive lens (CRL) objective. The dark-field resolution is similar. With an efficiency of 26.7 % the MLL objective expands the science domain of DFXM significantly, both for bulk and near-surface studies. Similar to the CRL case, the reciprocal space resolution is dominated by the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective, with the NA being three times larger in the MLL case. This enables faster orientation mapping and implies improved options for the use of tomographic reconstruction algorithms. Although the MLL objective pupil varies with energy and position, secondary peaks are suppressed, simplifying both interpretation and forward simulations. We present an example DFXM application using the MLL as an objective, imaging a through-silicon via Kelvin device.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the application of a crossed pair of Multilayer Laue Lenses (MLLs) as an objective in Dark-Field X-ray Microscopy (DFXM). In a demonstration at the ESRF ID03 beamline using two flat Mo-Si MLLs with a 50 × 50 μm² physical aperture and 14.25 mm focal length at 19 keV, the authors measure a spatial resolution of 56 nm in bright-field mode using a 10% criterion on the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), which is more than three times better than that achieved with a compound refractive lens (CRL) objective. The dark-field resolution is reported as similar, with an efficiency of 26.7%. The reciprocal-space resolution is stated to be dominated by the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective, which is three times larger for the MLL. The paper also notes that the MLL objective pupil varies with energy and position but suppresses secondary peaks, and provides an example of imaging a through-silicon via Kelvin device.

Significance. If the measured MTF is shown to be dominated by the MLL objective rather than beam or sample effects, this constitutes a meaningful advance for DFXM by delivering substantially higher spatial resolution and reciprocal-space coverage. The direct experimental quantification of resolution via MTF, efficiency, and an application example provides concrete support for expanding DFXM to finer-scale bulk and near-surface studies, with potential benefits for orientation mapping speed and tomographic algorithms.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and experimental results] Abstract and experimental demonstration: The headline 56 nm bright-field resolution (10% MTF criterion) and the factor-of-three improvement over CRL are load-bearing for the central claim. The manuscript does not describe auxiliary measurements (e.g., MTF versus incident-beam aperture, versus sample thickness, or versus CRL under identical illumination at 19 keV) that would isolate the objective pupil from beam divergence, partial coherence, or diffuse scattering from the through-silicon-via sample. Without these, the intrinsic resolution improvement and the assertion that NA alone sets reciprocal-space resolution remain unconfirmed.
  2. [Discussion] Reciprocal-space resolution section: The claim that reciprocal-space resolution is dominated by the larger NA of the MLL (three times that of CRL) and enables faster orientation mapping is not accompanied by quantitative comparison data or simulations under matched beam conditions. This weakens the implication for tomographic reconstruction improvements.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and methods] The efficiency value of 26.7 % is stated without a description of the measurement protocol, normalization, or uncertainty; this detail should be added for reproducibility.
  2. [Figures and results] MTF curves and resolution figures would benefit from inclusion of the CRL reference data on the same plot, together with any available error bands or multiple line scans, to allow direct visual assessment of the claimed improvement.
  3. [Throughout] Notation for numerical aperture (NA) and focal length should be checked for consistency between text, equations, and figure captions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and experimental results] Abstract and experimental demonstration: The headline 56 nm bright-field resolution (10% MTF criterion) and the factor-of-three improvement over CRL are load-bearing for the central claim. The manuscript does not describe auxiliary measurements (e.g., MTF versus incident-beam aperture, versus sample thickness, or versus CRL under identical illumination at 19 keV) that would isolate the objective pupil from beam divergence, partial coherence, or diffuse scattering from the through-silicon-via sample. Without these, the intrinsic resolution improvement and the assertion that NA alone sets reciprocal-space resolution remain unconfirmed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not include auxiliary measurements (such as varying incident-beam aperture or sample thickness) to fully isolate the MLL objective contribution from beam divergence or sample scattering. The reported comparison was performed by interchanging the MLL and CRL objectives in the same beamline setup at 19 keV under otherwise identical illumination and using the same through-silicon-via sample for MTF evaluation. In the revised manuscript we will add a paragraph in the results section that discusses the beamline divergence, partial coherence, and sample scattering contributions based on known ID03 characteristics, and we will explicitly state the limitations of the current data while arguing that the factor-of-three improvement is consistent with the NA difference. This addresses the concern without claiming additional measurements that were not performed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] Reciprocal-space resolution section: The claim that reciprocal-space resolution is dominated by the larger NA of the MLL (three times that of CRL) and enables faster orientation mapping is not accompanied by quantitative comparison data or simulations under matched beam conditions. This weakens the implication for tomographic reconstruction improvements.

    Authors: We agree that the reciprocal-space resolution discussion would be strengthened by quantitative estimates or simulations under matched conditions. The statement rests on the established result that DFXM reciprocal-space resolution is set by the objective NA. In the revised manuscript we will add a short quantitative comparison (using the measured NA values) of the reciprocal-space resolution for the MLL versus CRL cases, together with a brief discussion of the resulting implications for orientation mapping speed and tomographic algorithms, supported by references to prior DFXM simulation studies. This provides the requested quantitative context without requiring new experiments. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; resolution from direct experimental MTF measurement

full rationale

The paper's headline result (56 nm bright-field resolution at 10% MTF cutoff, >3x better than CRL) is obtained by applying a standard criterion to measured Modulation Transfer Functions acquired in a specific ID03 synchrotron setup. No derivations, predictions, or equations are presented that reduce this value to fitted parameters, self-citations, or inputs by construction. The reciprocal-space resolution claim is likewise tied to the measured numerical aperture of the objective rather than any self-referential modeling. The work is self-contained experimental reporting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental optics measurements rather than new theoretical derivations or postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The 10% MTF criterion is a valid and standard measure of spatial resolution in X-ray microscopy.
    Invoked to convert the measured MTF to the stated 56 nm resolution value.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5590 in / 1197 out tokens · 36626 ms · 2026-05-10T00:14:04.439057+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Reischig, P

    McDonald, S. and Reischig, P. and Holzner, C. and Lauridsen, E. and Withers, P.J. and Merkle, A.P. and Feser, M. , title =. Sci. Rep. , year =

  2. [2]

    MRS Bulletin , publisher =

    Yildirim, Can and Cook, Phil and Detlefs, Carsten and Simons, Hugh and Poulsen, Henning Friis , title =. MRS Bulletin , publisher =

  3. [3]

    Hlushko and J

    K. Hlushko and J. Keckes and G. Ressel and J. Pornbacher and W. Ecker and M. Kutsal and P. K. Cook and C. Detlefs and C. Yildirim , title =. Scripta Mater. , year =. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.06.053 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.06.053 2020

  4. [4]

    Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 204, 106277 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMPS.2025.106277

    Axel Henningsson and Sina Borgi and Grethe Winther and Anter El-Azab and Henning Friis Poulsen , title =. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , year =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106277 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106277 2025

  5. [5]

    Advances in X-Ray/EUV Optics and Components IX , title =

    Thomas Roth and Lukas Helfen and J. Advances in X-Ray/EUV Optics and Components IX , title =. doi:10.1117/12.2061127 , editor =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2061127

  6. [6]

    Simons and A

    H. Simons and A. King and W. Ludwig and C. Detlefs and W. Pantleon and S. Schmidt and F. St. Dark field x-ray microscopy for multiscale structural characterization , doi =. Nat. Commun. , owner =

  7. [7]

    Aditya Shukla and Can Yildirim and James A. D. Ball and Carsten Detlefs and Adam A. W. Cretton and Marilyn Sarkis and Michela La Bella and Wolfgang Ludwig and Yubin Zhang and Nils Axel Henningsson , title =

  8. [8]

    Nazmov and L

    V. Nazmov and L. Shabel'nikov and J.-F. Pantenburg and J. Mohr and E. Reznikova and A. Snigirev and I. Snigireva and S. Kouznetsov and M. DiMichiel , title =. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B , year =. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2003.11.002 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2003.11.002 2003

  9. [9]

    Cook and Carsten Detlefs , title =

    Henning Friis Poulsen and Anders Clemen Jakobsen and Hugh Simons and Sonja Rosenlund Ahl and Philip K. Cook and Carsten Detlefs , title =. J. Appl. Cryst. , year =. doi:10.1107/S1600576717011037 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600576717011037

  10. [10]

    3-layer Fine Pitch Cu-Cu Hybrid Bonding Demonstrator With High Density TSV For Advanced CMOS Image Sensor Applications , doi =

    Nicolas, Stéphane and Suarez-Berru, Jerzy-Javier and Bresson, Nicolas and Socquet-Clerc, Carole and Assous, Myriam and Borel, Stéphan and Vélard, Rémi and Dechamp, Jérôme and Bouis, Renan and Roman, Antonio and Abadie, Karine and Hebras, Damien , booktitle =. 3-layer Fine Pitch Cu-Cu Hybrid Bonding Demonstrator With High Density TSV For Advanced CMOS Imag...

  11. [11]

    and David, Christian and Schroer, Christian G

    Seiboth, Frank and Kubec, Adam and Schropp, Andreas and Niese, Sven and Gawlitza, Peter and Garrevoet, Jan and Galbierz, Vanessa and Achilles, Silvio and Patjens, Svenja and Stuckelberger, Michael E. and David, Christian and Schroer, Christian G. , title =. Optics Express , month = aug, nolanguage =. doi:10.1364/OE.454863 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.454863

  12. [12]

    Morgan and Mauro Prasciolu and Andrzej Andrejczuk and Jacek Krzywinski and Alke Meents and David Pennicard and Heinz Graafsma and Anton Barty and Richard J

    Andrew J. Morgan and Mauro Prasciolu and Andrzej Andrejczuk and Jacek Krzywinski and Alke Meents and David Pennicard and Heinz Graafsma and Anton Barty and Richard J. Bean and Miriam Barthelmess and Dominik Oberthuer and Oleksandr Yefanov and Andrew Aquila and Henry N. Chapman and Sa?a Bajt , title =. Sci. Rep. , owner =

  13. [13]

    Imaging by parabolic refractive lenses in the hard X-ray range , doi =

    Lengeler, Bruno and Schroer, Christian and T. Imaging by parabolic refractive lenses in the hard X-ray range , doi =. J. Synchrotron Radiat. , year =

  14. [14]

    IOP Conference Series: Materials Science a nd Engineering 580, 012007 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/580/1/012007

    M. Kutsal and P. Bernard and G. Berruyer and P. K. Cook and R. Hino and A. C. Jakobsen and W. Ludwig and J. Ormstrup and T. Roth and H. Simons and K. Smets and J. X. Sierra and J. Wade and P. Wattecamps and C. Yildirim and H. F. Poulsen and C. Detlefs , title =. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering , year =. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/580/1/0120...

    work page doi:10.1088/1757-899x/580/1/012007

  15. [15]

    Murray and Anders F

    Kevin T. Murray and Anders F. Pedersen and Istvan Mohacsi and Carsten Detlefs and Andrew J. Morgan and Mauro Prasciolu and Can Yildirim and Hugh Simons and Anders C. Jakobsen and Henry N. Chapman and Henning F. Poulsen and Sa. Multilayer Laue lenses at high X-ray energies: performance and applications , doi =. Opt. Express , year =

  16. [16]

    Nanomaterials , year =

    Bartlomiej Lechowski and Kristina Kutukova and Joerg Grenzer and Iuliana Panchenko and Peter Krueger and Andre Clausner and Ehrenfried Zschech , title =. Nanomaterials , year =. doi:10.3390/nano14020233 , pages =

    work page doi:10.3390/nano14020233

  17. [17]

    arXiv , primaryclass =:2510.26665 , url =

    La Bella, Michela and Henning Friis Poulsen and Steffen Staeck and Nils Axel Henningsson and Merve Pinar Kabukcuoglu and Carsten Detlefs and Can Yildirim , title =. arXiv , primaryclass =:2510.26665 , url =

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Communications Materials , month = aug, year =

    Yildirim, Can and Shukla, Aditya and Zhang, Yubin and Mavrikakis, Nikolas and Lesage, Louis and Sanna, Virginia and Sarkis, Marilyn and Li, Yaozhu and La Bella, Michela and Detlefs, Carsten and Poulsen, Henning Friis , title =. Communications Materials , month = aug, year =. doi:10.1038/s43246-025-00926-9 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1038/s43246-025-00926-9

  19. [19]

    and Reischig, P

    Ludwig, W. and Reischig, P. and King, A. and Herbig, M. and Lauridsen, E. M. and Johnson, G. and Marrow, T. J. and Buffiere, J. Y. , title =. Rev. Sci. Instrum. , year =

  20. [20]

    Wang and R

    W. Wang and R. Döhrmann and S. Botta and A. Madsen and C.G. Schroer and F. Seiboth , title =. Optics Express , year =. doi:10.1364/OE.562556 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.562556

  21. [21]

    Scripta Materialia , publisher =

    Yildirim, C and Mavrikakis, N and Cook, PK and Rodriguez-Lamas, R and Kutsal, M and Poulsen, HF and Detlefs, C , title =. Scripta Materialia , publisher =

  22. [22]

    Poulsen, H. F. and Dresselhaus-Marais, L. E. and Carlsen, M. A. and Detlefs, C. and Winther, G. , title =. Journal of Applied Crystallography , keywords =. doi:10.1107/S1600576721007287 , number =

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600576721007287

  23. [23]

    Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science , year =

    Henning Friis Poulsen , title =. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science , year =. doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2020.100820 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2020.100820 2020

  24. [24]

    H. F. Poulsen and S. F. Nielsen and E. M. Lauridsen and S. Schmidt and R. M. Suter and U. Lienert and L. Margulies and T. Lorentzen and Juul Jensen, D. , pages =. J. Appl. Crystallogr. , owner =

  25. [25]

    and Stephenson, G

    Maser, J. and Stephenson, G. B. and Vogt, S. and Yun, W. and Macrander, A. and Kang, H. C. and Liu, C. and Conley, R. , booktitle =. Multilayer Laue lenses as high-resolution X-ray optics , doi =

  26. [26]

    Kubec and J

    A. Kubec and J. Maser and P. Formánek and V. Franke and S. Braun and P. Gawlitza and A. Leson and A. Macrander , title =. Appl. Phys. Lett. , year =. doi:doi.org/10.1063/1.4978610 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4978610

  27. [27]

    Kubec and S

    A. Kubec and S. Niese and M. Rosenthal and J. Gluch and M. Burghammer and P. Gawlitza and J. Keckes and A. Leson , title =. J. Instrum. , year =. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/04/C0401 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/04/c0401

  28. [28]

    X-ray focusing with efficient high-

    Sa. X-ray focusing with efficient high-. Light Sci. Appl. , month = nov, nourl =. doi:10.1038/lsa.2017.162 , number =

    work page doi:10.1038/lsa.2017.162 2017

  29. [29]

    Staeck and F

    S. Staeck and F. Frankus and S. Borgi and A.A.W. Cretton and M. La Bella and A.G. Padula and J. Haack and M. Sarkis and C. Yildirim and G. Winther and C. Detlefs and H.F. Poulsen , title =. In preparation , year =

  30. [30]

    Staeck and F

    S. Staeck and F. Seiboth and T. Manning and T. Roth and C. Yildirim and C. Detlefs , title =. In preparation , year =

  31. [31]

    C. G. Schroer and O. Kurapova and J. Patommel and P. Boye and J. Feldkamp and B. Lengeler and M. Burghammer and C. Riekel and L. Vince and van der Hart, A. and M. K. Hard X-ray nanoprobe based on refractive X-ray lenses , pages =. Appl. Phys. Lett. , owner =

  32. [32]

    Snigirev and V

    A. Snigirev and V. G. Kohn and I. I. Snigireva and B. Lengeler , title =. Nature , timestamp =

  33. [33]

    AIP Conf

    Sven Niese and Stefan Braun and Reiner Dietsch and Jürgen Gluch and Thomas Holz and Norman Huber and Adam Kubec and Ehrenfried Zschech , title =. AIP Conf. Proc. , year =. doi:10.1063/1.4961130 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4961130

  34. [34]

    Schroer and Andreas Leson and Ehrenfried Zschech , title =

    Sven Niese and Peter Krüger and Adam Kubec and Stefan Braun and Jens Patommel and Christian G. Schroer and Andreas Leson and Ehrenfried Zschech , title =. Optics Express , year =. doi:10.1364/OE.22.020008 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.22.020008

  35. [35]

    Budai and Judy W

    Gene E Ice and John D. Budai and Judy W. L. Pang , title =. Science , owner =. doi:10.1126/science.1202366 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1202366

  36. [36]

    Isern and T

    H. Isern and T. Brochard and T. Dufrane and P. Brumund and E. Papillon and D. Scortani and R. Hino and C. Yildirim and R. Rodriguez Lamas and Y. Li and M. Sarkis and C. Detlefs , title =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.13391 , note =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.13391

  37. [37]

    H. N. Chapman and S. Bajt , title =. J. Opt. , year =. doi:10.1088/2040-8986/abb9c2 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1088/2040-8986/abb9c2 2040

  38. [38]

    Mavrikakis and C

    N. Mavrikakis and C. Detlefs and P.K. Cook and M. Kutsal and A.P.C. Campos and M. Gauvin and P.R. Calvillo and W. Saikaly and R. Hubert and H.F. Poulsen and A. Vaugeois and H. Zapolsky and D. Mangelinck and M. Dumont and C. Yildirim , title =. Acta Mater. , month = aug, nourl =. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.021 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.021 2019

  39. [39]

    Recent Progress in the Development of High-Density TSV for 3-Layers CMOS Image Sensors , doi =

    Borel, Stephan and Assous, Myriam and Moreau, Stephane and Velard, Remi , booktitle =. Recent Progress in the Development of High-Density TSV for 3-Layers CMOS Image Sensors , doi =

  40. [40]

    J. Lukas Dresselhaus and Margarita Zakharova and Nikolay Ivanov and Holger Fleckenstein and Mauro Prasciolu and Oleksandr Yefanov and Chufeng Li and Wenhui Zhang and Philipp Middendorf and Dmitry Egorov and Ivan De Gennaro Aquino and Henry N. Chapman and Saša Bajt , title =. Optics Express , year =. doi:10.1364/OE.518964 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.518964

  41. [41]

    Low Resistance and High Isolation HD TSV for 3-Layer CMOS Image Sensors , doi =

    Borel, Stéphan and Assous, Myriam and Vélard, Rémi and Suarez-Berru, Jerzy-Javier and Nicolas, Stéphane and Dechamp, Jérôme and Bouis, Renan and Vignoud, Lionel and Valentin, Paul and Marchand, Jérémy and Roman, Antonio and Bedjaoui, Messaoud , booktitle =. Low Resistance and High Isolation HD TSV for 3-Layer CMOS Image Sensors , doi =

  42. [42]

    X-ray coherent diffraction imaging with an objective lens: towards 3D mapping of thick polycrystals , doi =

    Anders Fils. X-ray coherent diffraction imaging with an objective lens: towards 3D mapping of thick polycrystals , doi =. Physical Review Research , year =

  43. [43]

    Brian and Kang, Hyon Chol , title =

    Yan, Hanfei and Maser, J\"org and Macrander, Albert and Shen, Qun and Vogt, Stefan and Stephenson, G. Brian and Kang, Hyon Chol , title =. Phys. Rev. B , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.76.115438 , issue =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.115438