pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20388 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · physics.optics

Quantum Optical Signatures of Band Topology in Solid-State High Harmonics

Denis Ilin , Alexander S. Solntsev , Ivan Iorsh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall physics.optics
keywords high-harmonic generationband topologySu-Schrieffer-Heeger modelsqueezed lightquantum opticsdensity matrixphoton statisticssolid-state systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

In the SSH model the topological phase produces stronger high-harmonic signals and more squeezed quantum light than the trivial phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a density-matrix description of high-harmonic generation that keeps track of the mixed-state character of both the solid and the emitted light. When this framework is applied to the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain inside a one-sided cavity, the topological phase is found to generate a larger high-harmonic response whose photon statistics carry a stronger non-classical signature. The squeezing arises directly from current-current fluctuations encoded in the material susceptibility rather than from a separate Kerr nonlinearity, which is shown to be negligible in the mesoscopic regime.

Core claim

Within the weak-correlation expansion, the emitted high-harmonic field in the topological phase of the SSH model exhibits both an enhanced amplitude and stronger quadrature squeezing than in the trivial phase. The squeezing is imprinted by the current-current fluctuations of the solid and does not require an additional quartic interaction; the relevant non-classical effect is carried by the complex susceptibility already present in the linear response of the material.

What carries the argument

Density-matrix evolution of the coupled light-matter system under a weak-correlation expansion, which lets current-current fluctuations in the solid directly determine the photon statistics of the high harmonics.

If this is right

  • Cavity-embedded topological insulators can function as sources of topology-controlled squeezed high-harmonic light.
  • Photon-statistics measurements can serve as a spectroscopic probe of band topology in solids.
  • The link between current fluctuations and emitted squeezing holds for any solid whose linear susceptibility encodes its band geometry.
  • Topology-sensitive quantum light generation becomes possible without engineered nonlinearities beyond the cavity-matter coupling itself.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same density-matrix treatment could be applied to other one-dimensional or two-dimensional topological models to predict their distinct squeezing signatures.
  • Time-resolved quadrature measurements on the high harmonics might allow real-time tracking of a topological phase transition driven by an external parameter.
  • The framework suggests that any solid-state system whose current fluctuations are modified by band topology will imprint corresponding changes on the quantum state of the emitted light.

Load-bearing premise

The weak-correlation expansion between photons and electrons remains valid throughout the dual regime of the SSH model, and the genuine quantum Kerr term stays negligible compared with fluctuation-driven effects in the mesoscopic limit.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures equal or weaker high-harmonic intensity and equal or weaker squeezing in the topological phase relative to the trivial phase, under otherwise identical cavity and driving conditions, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20388 by Alexander S. Solntsev, Denis Ilin, Ivan Iorsh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The solid-state structure is driven by external multi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The crystal structure is placed inside a one-sided [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a) The atomic structure of the one-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) The second-order correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two-mode squeezing (top panel) and two-mode en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a general theory of high-harmonic generation (HHG) in solid-state systems, based on a weak-correlation expansion of photonic and matter degrees of freedom. Unlike standard HHG theories, which treat light-matter dynamics through the Schrodinger equation, our approach employs density-matrix evolution, naturally capturing the mixed-state character of both the field and the matter - a critical aspect for describing complex solid-state band structures. We show explicitly that the properties of the emitted fields are governed by the quantum statistics and quantum geometry of the underlying solid. Taking the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model in a one-sided optical cavity as a paradigmatic example and considering the dual regime, we demonstrate that in the topological phase a system exhibits a stronger HHG response and stronger quantum-light signatures than in the trivial phase. Furthermore, we show that cavity-matter interaction gives rise to squeezed high-harmonic quantum light, whose properties are directly imprinted by the current-current fluctuations in the material system. Crucially, the observed squeezing does not rely on a separate quartic Kerr mechanism. In the mesoscopic regime, the genuine quantum Kerr term is higher order in light-matter coupling strength and negligible, while the relevant non-classical effect is governed by current-current fluctuations encoded in the complex susceptibility of the material. This work establishes a direct link between band topology and photon statistics, opening new avenues for topology-sensitive quantum light generation and photon statistics based spectroscopy of solid-state systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a general theory of high-harmonic generation (HHG) in solid-state systems based on a weak-correlation expansion of photonic and matter degrees of freedom, employing density-matrix evolution to capture mixed states. Using the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model in a one-sided optical cavity in the dual regime as an example, it claims that the topological phase exhibits a stronger HHG response and stronger quantum-light signatures than the trivial phase, and that cavity-matter interactions produce squeezed high-harmonic quantum light whose properties are imprinted by current-current fluctuations encoded in the material's complex susceptibility, without relying on a separate quartic Kerr mechanism (which is argued to be negligible in the mesoscopic regime).

Significance. If the central approximations are valid, the work establishes a direct connection between band topology, quantum geometry, and photon statistics in HHG, which could enable new topology-sensitive sources of quantum light and photon-statistics-based spectroscopy of solids. The density-matrix approach for handling complex band structures is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on SSH model and dual regime (around the derivation of squeezed light)] The validity of the weak-correlation expansion of photonic and matter degrees of freedom, and the claim that the genuine quantum Kerr term is higher-order in light-matter coupling and thus negligible compared to current-current fluctuation effects, lacks explicit expansion parameters, error estimates, or order-of-magnitude comparisons for the SSH model parameters in the dual regime. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim that squeezing is directly imprinted by the susceptibility rather than other mechanisms, and topology could in principle alter the relative size of the quartic term.
  2. [Application to SSH model and results on phase comparison] No numerical benchmarks, error bars, or explicit validation are provided to confirm that the weak-correlation expansion remains valid across topological and trivial phases for the chosen cavity parameters; this undermines the comparative claim of stronger HHG and quantum signatures in the topological phase.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The term 'dual regime' is used without a concise definition or reference to its parameter range in the abstract and early sections; adding this would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section on SSH model and dual regime (around the derivation of squeezed light)] The validity of the weak-correlation expansion of photonic and matter degrees of freedom, and the claim that the genuine quantum Kerr term is higher-order in light-matter coupling and thus negligible compared to current-current fluctuation effects, lacks explicit expansion parameters, error estimates, or order-of-magnitude comparisons for the SSH model parameters in the dual regime. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim that squeezing is directly imprinted by the susceptibility rather than other mechanisms, and topology could in principle alter the relative size of the quartic term.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would be strengthened by explicit expansion parameters and order-of-magnitude estimates. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) in the methods/results section that defines the small parameter of the weak-correlation expansion for the dual regime and provides numerical estimates for the SSH parameters. This will show that the quartic Kerr term is suppressed by at least one order of magnitude relative to the current-current fluctuation contribution for the chosen cavity and material parameters. We will also explicitly verify that the relative size of the Kerr term does not change between the topological and trivial phases for these parameters, thereby confirming that the squeezing mechanism remains imprinted by the susceptibility in both cases. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Application to SSH model and results on phase comparison] No numerical benchmarks, error bars, or explicit validation are provided to confirm that the weak-correlation expansion remains valid across topological and trivial phases for the chosen cavity parameters; this undermines the comparative claim of stronger HHG and quantum signatures in the topological phase.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of explicit validation. While the dual-regime definition already ensures the expansion parameter remains small and independent of topology for the cavity parameters employed, we will add supporting analysis in the revision. This will include a brief convergence check or comparison against higher-order perturbative terms (presented either in the main text or as supplementary material) that confirms the expansion accuracy holds to the same precision in both the topological and trivial phases. These benchmarks will directly support the reported comparative differences in HHG response and quantum signatures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain self-contained; no reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper introduces a weak-correlation expansion for density-matrix evolution of light-matter system, applies it to compute HHG and photon statistics for the SSH model in cavity, and shows squeezing arises from current-current fluctuations via the complex susceptibility (a derived response function) rather than a separate Kerr term argued to be higher-order. No quoted step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter, self-citation load-bearing premise, or ansatz smuggled from prior work; the topological vs trivial comparison follows from explicit model diagonalization and geometry factors. The approximation validity and Kerr negligibility are stated assumptions without explicit bounds, but this is a correctness issue, not circularity in the derivation itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a weak-correlation expansion whose validity is asserted but not derived here, plus standard assumptions of the SSH model and cavity QED in the mesoscopic limit.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Weak-correlation expansion of photonic and matter degrees of freedom is valid
    Invoked to justify density-matrix treatment instead of Schrödinger equation
  • domain assumption Dual regime for SSH model in one-sided cavity
    Used to demonstrate topological vs trivial phase differences

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1296 out tokens · 28776 ms · 2026-05-09T23:31:21.534623+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (A2) By one integration over the time of matter reduced density matrix we obtain an integral equation, which em- phasizes the non-Markovian nature of equations

    Matter subsystem We start form the weak-correlation expansion for re- duced density matrices for matter and photonic subsys- tems, namely ˙ρM(t) =−i[Tr F [Hef f(t)ρF (t)], ρ M(t)] −TrF h Hef f(t), tZ −∞ dt′[ ˜Hef f(t′), ρM(t′)⊗ρ F (t′)] i , ˙ρF (t) =−i[Tr M[Hef f(t)ρM(t)], ρ F (t)] −TrM h Hef f(t), tZ −∞ dt′[ ˜Hef f(t′), ρM(t′)⊗ρ F (t′)] i , (A1) where ˜H...

  2. [2]

    (10) by opening the brackets in the Lindbladian term

    Photonic subsystem We can rewrite the photonic density matrix equa- tion (A1) in the form of Eq. (10) by opening the brackets in the Lindbladian term. This equation can be simplified 15 further. Taking into account our discussion of the aver- age paramagnetic current from the previous subsection, we can say that the unitary term in Eq. (10) is ⟨ ˆHef f(t)...

  3. [3]

    Plasma perspective on strong field mul- tiphoton ionization,

    P. B. Corkum, “Plasma perspective on strong field mul- tiphoton ionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1994–1997 (1993)

    1994

  4. [4]

    Harmonic generation in co2 laser target interaction,

    N. H. Burnett, H. A. Baldis, M. C. Richardson, and G. D. Enright, “Harmonic generation in co2 laser target interaction,” Applied Physics Letters31, 172–174 (1977)

    1977

  5. [5]

    Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases,

    M Ferray, A L’Huillier, X F Li, L A Lompre, G Mainfray, and C Manus, “Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics21, L31 (1988)

    1988

  6. [6]

    Observa- tion of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation,

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Aug´ e, Ph. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, “Observa- tion of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation,” Science292, 1689–1692 (2001)

    2001

  7. [7]

    Attosecond physics,

    Ferenc Krausz and Misha Ivanov, “Attosecond physics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 163–234 (2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields,

    M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, Anne L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, “Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields,” Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117–2132 (1994)

    1994

  9. [9]

    High-order harmonic generation from atoms and ions in the high intensity regime,

    Jeffrey L. Krause, Kenneth J. Schafer, and Kenneth C. Kulander, “High-order harmonic generation from atoms and ions in the high intensity regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3535–3538 (1992)

    1992

  10. [10]

    Theoretical analysis of high-harmonic generation in solids,

    G. Vampa, C. R. McDonald, G. Orlando, D. D. Klug, P. B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, “Theoretical analysis of high-harmonic generation in solids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 073901 (2014)

    2014

  11. [11]

    Redshift in the optical absorption of zno single crystals in the presence of an intense midinfrared laser field,

    Shambhu Ghimire, Anthony D. DiChiara, Emily Sistrunk, Urszula B. Szafruga, Pierre Agostini, Louis F. DiMauro, and David A. Reis, “Redshift in the optical absorption of zno single crystals in the presence of an intense midinfrared laser field,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 167407 (2011)

    2011

  12. [12]

    Sub- cycle control of terahertz high-harmonic generation by dynamical bloch oscillations,

    O. Schubert, M. Hohenleutner, F. Langer,et al., “Sub- cycle control of terahertz high-harmonic generation by dynamical bloch oscillations,” Nature Photonics8, 119– 123 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    Observa- tion of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal,

    S. Ghimire, A. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk,et al., “Observa- tion of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal,” Nature Physics7, 138–141 (2011)

    2011

  14. [14]

    Quantum optical signatures in strong-field laser physics: Infrared photon counting in high-order-harmonic generation,

    I. Gonoskov, N. Tsatrafyllis, I. Kominis,et al., “Quantum optical signatures in strong-field laser physics: Infrared photon counting in high-order-harmonic generation,” Sci- entific Reports6, 32821 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    High-order harmonic generation as induced by a quantized field: Phase-space picture,

    ´Akos Gombk¨ ot˝ o, S´ andor Varr´ o, P´ eter Mati, and P´ eter F¨ oldi, “High-order harmonic generation as induced by a quantized field: Phase-space picture,” Phys. Rev. A101, 013418 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Quantum theory of radiation by nonstation- ary systems with application to high-order harmonic gen- eration,

    Danis N. Yangaliev, Vladimir P. Krainov, and Oleg I. Tolstikhin, “Quantum theory of radiation by nonstation- ary systems with application to high-order harmonic gen- eration,” Phys. Rev. A101, 013410 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    The quantum- optical nature of high harmonic generation,

    A. Gorlach, O. Neufeld, N. Rivera,et al., “The quantum- optical nature of high harmonic generation,” Nature Communications11, 4598 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Entanglement and squeezing of the opti- cal field modes in high harmonic generation,

    Philipp Stammer, Javier Rivera-Dean, Andrew S. Maxwell, Theocharis Lamprou, Javier Arg¨ uello-Luengo, Paraskevas Tzallas, Marcelo F. Ciappina, and Maciej Lewenstein, “Entanglement and squeezing of the opti- cal field modes in high harmonic generation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 143603 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Squeezed states of light after high- order harmonic generation in excited atomic systems,

    J. Rivera-Dean, H. B. Crispin, P. Stammer, Th. Lam- prou, E. Pisanty, M. Kr¨ uger, P. Tzallas, M. Lewenstein, and M. F. Ciappina, “Squeezed states of light after high- order harmonic generation in excited atomic systems,” Phys. Rev. A110, 063118 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Solid-state high-order harmonic gen- eration: emerging frontiers in ultrafast and quan- tum light science,

    M. F. Ciappina, “Solid-state high-order harmonic gen- eration: emerging frontiers in ultrafast and quan- tum light science,” Advances in Physics (2025), 10.1080/00018732.2025.2598130

    work page doi:10.1080/00018732.2025.2598130 2025

  21. [21]

    Generation of massively entangled bright states of light during harmonic generation in res- onant media,

    Sili Yi, Nikolai D. Klimkin, Graham Gardiner Brown, Olga Smirnova, Serguei Patchkovskii, Ihar Babushkin, and Misha Ivanov, “Generation of massively entangled bright states of light during harmonic generation in res- onant media,” Phys. Rev. X15, 011023 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Characterizing anoma- lous high-harmonic generation in solids,

    Lun Yue and Mette B. Gaarde, “Characterizing anoma- lous high-harmonic generation in solids,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 166903 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Light emis- sion from strongly driven many-body systems,

    A. Pizzi, A. Gorlach, N. Rivera,et al., “Light emis- sion from strongly driven many-body systems,” Nature Physics19, 551–561 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    Quantum interfer- ence and occupation control in high harmonic genera- tion from monolayer ws2,

    M. Kim, T. Kim, A. Galler,et al., “Quantum interfer- ence and occupation control in high harmonic genera- tion from monolayer ws2,” Nature Communications16 (2025), 10.1038/s41467-025-65725-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65725-9 2025

  25. [25]

    Anomalous temperature dependence of high-harmonic generation in mott insula- tors,

    Yuta Murakami, Kento Uchida, Akihisa Koga, Koichiro Tanaka, and Philipp Werner, “Anomalous temperature dependence of high-harmonic generation in mott insula- tors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 157401 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Track- ing ultrafast solid-state dynamics using high harmonic spectroscopy,

    Mina R. Bionta, Elissa Haddad, Adrien Leblanc, Vin- cent Gruson, Philippe Lassonde, Heide Ibrahim, J´ er´ emie Chaillou, Nicolas ´Emond, Martin R. Otto, ´Alvaro Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, Rui E. F. Silva, Misha Ivanov, Bradley J. Siwick, Mohamed Chaker, and Fran ¸ cois L´ egar´ e, “Track- ing ultrafast solid-state dynamics using high harmonic spectroscopy,” Phys....

    2021

  27. [27]

    High-order harmonic gen- eration and its unconventional scaling law in the mott- insulating ca2ruo4,

    K. Uchida, G. Mattoni, S. Yonezawa, F. Nakamura, Y. Maeno, and K. Tanaka, “High-order harmonic gen- eration and its unconventional scaling law in the mott- insulating ca2ruo4,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 127401 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Electron-correlation-induced non- classicality of light from high-order harmonic genera- tion,

    Christian Saugbjerg Lange, Thomas Hansen, and Lars Bojer Madsen, “Electron-correlation-induced non- classicality of light from high-order harmonic genera- tion,” Phys. Rev. A109, 033110 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Hi- 24 erarchy of approximations for describing quantum light from high-harmonic generation: A fermi-hubbard-model study,

    Christian Saugbjerg Lange and Lars Bojer Madsen, “Hi- 24 erarchy of approximations for describing quantum light from high-harmonic generation: A fermi-hubbard-model study,” Phys. Rev. A111, 013113 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Semiconductor bloch- equations formalism: Derivation and application to high- harmonic generation from dirac fermions,

    Jan Wilhelm, Patrick Gr¨ ossing, Adrian Seith, Jack Crewse, Maximilian Nitsch, Leonard Weigl, Christoph Schmid, and Ferdinand Evers, “Semiconductor bloch- equations formalism: Derivation and application to high- harmonic generation from dirac fermions,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 125419 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Reduced density matrix description of high-harmonic generation in multielectron atoms: Exploring subcycle correlation effects,

    Katharina Buczolich, Takeshi Sato, Kenichi L. Ishikawa, Fabian Lackner, Joachim Burgd¨ orfer, and Iva Bˇ rezinov´ a, “Reduced density matrix description of high-harmonic generation in multielectron atoms: Exploring subcycle correlation effects,” Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043322 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Second-order optical re- sponse in semiconductors,

    J. E. Sipe and A. I. Shkrebtii, “Second-order optical re- sponse in semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. B61, 5337–5352 (2000)

    2000

  33. [33]

    Resonant second-harmonic generation as a probe of quantum geometry,

    Pankaj Bhalla, Kamal Das, Dimitrie Culcer, and Amit Agarwal, “Resonant second-harmonic generation as a probe of quantum geometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 227401 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Second harmonic gen- eration in the weyl semimetal taas from a quantum ki- netic equation,

    Zhi Li, Ya-Qin Jin, Takami Tohyama, Toshiaki Iitaka, Jiu-Xing Zhang, and Haibin Su, “Second harmonic gen- eration in the weyl semimetal taas from a quantum ki- netic equation,” Phys. Rev. B97, 085201 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Correlation-picture approach to open-quantum-system dynamics,

    S. Alipour, A. T. Rezakhani, A. P. Babu, K. Mølmer, M. M¨ ott¨ onen, and T. Ala-Nissila, “Correlation-picture approach to open-quantum-system dynamics,” Phys. Rev. X10, 041024 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Framework to measure quantum metric from step response,

    Nishchhal Verma and Raquel Queiroz, “Framework to measure quantum metric from step response,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106403 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Scully and M

    Marlan O. Scully and M. Suhail Zubairy,Quantum Op- tics(Cambridge University Press, 1997)

    1997

  38. [38]

    Direct observation of sub-binomial light,

    Tim J. Bartley, Gaia Donati, Xian-Min Jin, Animesh Datta, Marco Barbieri, and Ian A. Walmsley, “Direct observation of sub-binomial light,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 173602 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    Measure- ment of the quantum states of squeezed light,

    G. Breitenbach, S. Schiller, and J. Mlynek, “Measure- ment of the quantum states of squeezed light,” Nature 387, 471–475 (1997)

    1997

  40. [40]

    Gaussian quantum informa- tion,

    Christian Weedbrook, Stefano Pirandola, Ra´ ul Garc´ia- Patr´ on, Nicolas J. Cerf, Timothy C. Ralph, Jeffrey H. Shapiro, and Seth Lloyd, “Gaussian quantum informa- tion,” Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 621–669 (2012)

    2012

  41. [41]

    Quantum entanglement,

    Ryszard Horodecki, Pawe l Horodecki, Micha l Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki, “Quantum entanglement,” Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 865–942 (2009)

    2009

  42. [42]

    Quantum Noise in Quantum Optics: the Stochastic Schr\"odinger Equation

    Peter Zoller and C. W. Gardiner, “Quantum noise in quantum optics: The Stochastic Schr¨ odinger equation,” (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9702030

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  43. [43]

    Master equation derivation of quantum regres- sion theorem,

    S Swain, “Master equation derivation of quantum regres- sion theorem,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General14, 2577 (1981)

    1981

  44. [44]

    Quantum regression theorem for out-of-time-ordered correlation functions,

    Philip Daniel Blocher and Klaus Mølmer, “Quantum regression theorem for out-of-time-ordered correlation functions,” Phys. Rev. A99, 033816 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    Adjoint master equation for mul- titime correlators,

    Ivan V. Panyukov, Vladislav Yu. Shishkov, and Evgeny S. Andrianov, “Adjoint master equation for mul- titime correlators,” Phys. Rev. A109, 052207 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Solitons in polyacetylene,

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, “Solitons in polyacetylene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 1698–1701 (1979)

    1979

  47. [47]

    Topological edge states in the su-schrieffer-heeger model,

    Daichi Obana, Feng Liu, and Katsunori Wakabayashi, “Topological edge states in the su-schrieffer-heeger model,” Phys. Rev. B100, 075437 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    Observation of the topo- logical soliton state in the su–schrieffer–heeger model,

    An F. Meier and B. Gadway, “Observation of the topo- logical soliton state in the su–schrieffer–heeger model,” Nat Commun7(2016), 10.1038/ncomms13986

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms13986 2016

  49. [49]

    Quantum origin of anomalous floquet phases in cavity- qed materials,

    B. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, G. Platero, and ´A. G´ omez-Le´ on, “Quantum origin of anomalous floquet phases in cavity- qed materials,” Communications Physics7, 395 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Su- schrieffer-heeger model — from fundamentals to re- sponses,

    D. Mondal, A. Bandyopadhyay, and D. Jana, “Su- schrieffer-heeger model — from fundamentals to re- sponses,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics (2025), 10.1007/s10773-025-05981-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10773-025-05981-z 2025

  51. [51]

    High-harmonic gener- ation in su-schrieffer-heeger chains,

    Hannah J¨ urß and Dieter Bauer, “High-harmonic gener- ation in su-schrieffer-heeger chains,” Phys. Rev. B99, 195428 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    Band structure of poly- acetylene, (ch)x,

    P. M. Grant and I. P. Batra, “Band structure of poly- acetylene, (ch)x,” Solid State Communications29, 225– 229 (1979)

    1979