pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20532 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🧮 math.OC

Reliability as a Design Principle: A Systematic Review and Integrated Framework for Renewable-Based Microgrids

Mohammed Zeehan Saleheen , Markus Wagner , Reza Razzaghi , Hao Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords reliabilitymicrogridsrenewable energyDunkelflauteenergy adequacysystematic reviewoptimizationpower system planning
0
0 comments X

The pith

Renewable microgrid reliability is governed by time-coupled energy adequacy during scarcity events rather than installed capacity alone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This systematic review positions reliability as the central principle for designing renewable-based microgrids and synthesizes how planning choices, optimization methods, operational flexibility, and assessment tools interact to determine outcomes. It establishes that adequacy depends on chronological energy balance over time, with extended low-renewable periods like Dunkelflaute proving decisive for failures, while conventional single-number reliability indices hide the temporal and service-specific risks. The work consolidates these elements into an integrated roadmap and flags consistent shortcomings in modeling correlated resource shortages and valuing interruptions. Readers should care because microgrids are expanding rapidly, and designs that ignore these time dynamics risk underperforming exactly when communities need them most.

Core claim

The synthesis shows that reliability in renewable-based microgrids is governed primarily by chronological, time-coupled energy adequacy rather than installed capacity alone, with Dunkelflaute events emerging as a key determinant of adequacy failure. Reliability outcomes are shaped by the joint interaction of resource portfolios, storage operating policies, and state trajectories, network features, and protection feasibility under inverter-dominated operation. The review further demonstrates that reliability indices inherited from conventional power systems are poorly suited for renewable-based microgrids, as they compress performance into single dimensions and obscure temporal, spatial, and

What carries the argument

chronological time-coupled energy adequacy assessment that treats Dunkelflaute events as central failure drivers, embedded within an integrated roadmap of planning factors, multi-objective optimization, and metric evaluation.

If this is right

  • Reliability outcomes improve when optimization uses multi-objective or constrained formulations rather than capacity-only objectives.
  • Network topology and inverter protection limits must be modeled jointly with generation and storage trajectories to predict adequacy correctly.
  • Persistent gaps in handling correlated renewable scarcity and mission-profile component reliability require new modeling approaches.
  • Interruption valuation through consistent value-of-lost-load and customer damage functions must be integrated into decision frameworks.
  • Planning should shift toward state-aware, service-oriented assessment that tracks performance over full time series.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Microgrid operators could reduce outage duration by scheduling storage and demand response specifically around predicted multi-day scarcity windows rather than average conditions.
  • The same time-coupled adequacy logic may apply to larger distribution networks with high renewable penetration, suggesting a need for similar chronological modeling at scale.
  • Empirical tests could compare historical outage records from operating renewable microgrids against predictions from traditional versus adequacy-focused models to quantify the difference.
  • Explicit inclusion of customer damage functions might naturally lead to differentiated service priorities, protecting critical loads first during adequacy shortfalls.

Load-bearing premise

The body of literature examined is representative enough to identify inherited indices as poorly suited and to label the listed gaps as the most persistent ones.

What would settle it

A new survey or set of real microgrid case studies demonstrating that conventional single-dimension indices like loss-of-load probability fully capture failure risks without missing time-dependent or service-specific concentrations would directly challenge the central synthesis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20532 by Hao Wang, Markus Wagner, Mohammed Zeehan Saleheen, Reza Razzaghi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Rapid review methodology [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Database search strategy. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Search and screening as per PRISMA flow diagrams. statistical aggregation is not applicable to the present evidence base due to substantial heterogeneity across studies in system configurations, modeling assumptions, temporal resolution, opti￾mization techniques, and performance metrics. Consequently, this review adopts a qualitative narrative synthesis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the tradeoff between reliability and cost. system reliability and excessive outage-related losses that out￾weigh capital savings. In contrast, design choices that exceed this optimum represent overinvestment, yielding diminishing economic returns despite continued reliability improvement. This challenge of balancing the TCO against the interruption costs requires a standardized method to ec… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Microgrid design and planning procedure (modified for reliability-oriented Design [16, 128]). emphasize reliability considerations. While planners may tailor or extend specific steps to suit local conditions or emerging technologies, adherence to this structured guideline provides a consistent and transparent foundation for designing reliable, cost-effective, and socially responsive microgrid systems in th… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A modified flowchart for reliability evaluation of distributed microgrids [44]. 1. Failure Duration and Impact: In this step, the al￾gorithm calculates the duration of the failure and the unsupplied load at each affected load point. 2. TTF Recalculation: A new TTF is calculated for component C for the subsequent iteration. 3. Failure Metrics: The algorithm calculates the aver￾age failure rate and duration … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Classification of reliability indices. year). It is important to note that this formulation follows the conventional assumption of a radial supply structure where each load point has a single supply path, such that any component failure causes interruption. However, micro￾grids frequently incorporate redundancy through multiple distributed generators, energy storage systems, or meshed network connections, … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reliable operation is a central motivation for deploying renewable-based microgrids. This paper presents a systematic rapid review that positions reliability as the central organizing principle for microgrid design. Specifically, this review systematically synthesizes recent literature to examine how planning assumptions, optimization formulations, operational flexibility mechanisms, and reliability assessment frameworks jointly shape reliability outcomes. The synthesis shows that reliability in renewable-based microgrids is governed primarily by chronological, time-coupled energy adequacy rather than installed capacity alone, with Dunkelflaute events emerging as a key determinant of adequacy failure. Reliability outcomes are shaped by the joint interaction of resource portfolios, storage operating policies, and state trajectories, network features, and protection feasibility under inverter-dominated operation. The review further demonstrates that reliability indices inherited from conventional power systems are poorly suited for renewable-based microgrids, as they compress performance into single dimensions and obscure temporal, spatial, and service-critical risk concentrations. Across optimization practice, reliability is increasingly embedded through multi-objective and constrained formulations; however, persistent gaps remain in representing correlated renewable scarcity, mission-profile-dependent component reliability, and interruption valuation (e.g., value of lost load and customer damage functions) in a consistent and decision-relevant manner. Overall, this review consolidates planning factors, optimization approaches, reliability evaluation methods, and metric suitability into an integrated roadmap for reliability-centered microgrid planning, and outlines future directions toward state-aware, service-oriented planning and assessment frameworks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a systematic rapid review synthesizing recent literature on reliability in renewable-based microgrids. It positions reliability as the central design principle and concludes that outcomes are governed primarily by chronological, time-coupled energy adequacy (with Dunkelflaute events as a key determinant) rather than installed capacity alone. The review argues that conventional reliability indices are poorly suited because they obscure temporal, spatial, and service-critical risks, notes increasing use of multi-objective optimization formulations, identifies persistent gaps in correlated scarcity, mission-profile-dependent reliability, and interruption valuation, and consolidates these elements into an integrated roadmap for state-aware, service-oriented planning.

Significance. If the underlying literature synthesis is representative and rigorous, the work offers a useful consolidation of planning assumptions, optimization practices, flexibility mechanisms, and assessment frameworks. Explicitly framing reliability as the organizing principle and highlighting the shift from capacity-centric to adequacy-centric views could help orient future microgrid research toward more decision-relevant metrics and state-aware models. The gap analysis on correlated renewable scarcity and consistent interruption valuation provides a clear agenda for subsequent modeling efforts.

major comments (2)
  1. [Review Methodology] Review Methodology section: The manuscript supplies no search strings, database list, date range, inclusion/exclusion criteria, PRISMA flow counts, or quality-assessment protocol. Because the central claims—that chronological adequacy governs reliability more than capacity, that Dunkelflaute events are a key determinant, and that inherited indices are poorly suited—rest entirely on the completeness and representativeness of the reviewed corpus, the absence of these details prevents verification that papers quantifying capacity-driven reliability or proposing alternative multi-dimensional indices were not omitted.
  2. [Synthesis of reliability indices] Synthesis of reliability indices (results/discussion): The claim that conventional indices compress performance into single dimensions and obscure risk concentrations is asserted without citing specific quantitative failures or counter-examples drawn from the reviewed papers. A load-bearing comparison—e.g., how LOLP or SAIDI mask temporal scarcity patterns in inverter-dominated microgrids versus proposed time-coupled metrics—would be required to substantiate the assertion that these indices are systematically inadequate.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is information-dense; separating the synthesis findings from the gap identification and roadmap contribution into distinct sentences would improve readability.
  2. [References] Several citations appear in the text without corresponding entries in the reference list or vice versa; a consistency check is needed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our systematic rapid review. The feedback highlights important areas for improving methodological transparency and strengthening the evidence base for our claims regarding reliability indices. We have prepared point-by-point responses below and will incorporate revisions to address these concerns in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Review Methodology] Review Methodology section: The manuscript supplies no search strings, database list, date range, inclusion/exclusion criteria, PRISMA flow counts, or quality-assessment protocol. Because the central claims—that chronological adequacy governs reliability more than capacity, that Dunkelflaute events are a key determinant, and that inherited indices are poorly suited—rest entirely on the completeness and representativeness of the reviewed corpus, the absence of these details prevents verification that papers quantifying capacity-driven reliability or proposing alternative multi-dimensional indices were not omitted.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the review protocol is necessary to substantiate the representativeness of the corpus and the validity of the central claims. Although the manuscript characterizes the work as a systematic rapid review, the detailed elements were omitted for conciseness. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the Review Methodology section to include the exact search strings, the list of databases (IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science), the date range (2018–2024), inclusion/exclusion criteria (e.g., focus on renewable-based microgrids, reliability assessment, optimization formulations), a PRISMA flow diagram with screening counts, and the quality-assessment criteria applied. These additions will allow verification that capacity-centric and alternative-index studies were not systematically excluded. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Synthesis of reliability indices] Synthesis of reliability indices (results/discussion): The claim that conventional indices compress performance into single dimensions and obscure risk concentrations is asserted without citing specific quantitative failures or counter-examples drawn from the reviewed papers. A load-bearing comparison—e.g., how LOLP or SAIDI mask temporal scarcity patterns in inverter-dominated microgrids versus proposed time-coupled metrics—would be required to substantiate the assertion that these indices are systematically inadequate.

    Authors: The critique of conventional indices is synthesized from patterns across the reviewed literature rather than asserted in isolation; however, we acknowledge that the current text does not provide explicit quantitative counter-examples. In the revision, we will augment the Synthesis of reliability indices section with a dedicated comparison subsection and table. This will draw specific examples from the corpus, such as studies demonstrating how LOLP and SAIDI average out high-impact Dunkelflaute periods in inverter-dominated systems (leading to underestimation of adequacy risk) versus time-coupled or state-aware metrics that reveal temporal and service-critical concentrations. These additions will directly cite and quantify the limitations from the reviewed papers. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in literature synthesis

full rationale

This paper is a systematic rapid review whose central claims (primacy of chronological time-coupled adequacy, Dunkelflaute events as key determinant, and unsuitability of inherited indices) are explicitly framed as syntheses drawn from external published literature rather than any internal derivation, fitted parameter, or self-referential definition. No equations, optimization models, or predictive results appear that could reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs; the review instead consolidates planning factors, optimization approaches, and metric suitability from the reviewed body of work into a roadmap. The synthesis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, with no load-bearing step that collapses into a self-citation chain, ansatz, or renaming of a known result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on the domain assumption that reliability should be the central design principle and that the selected literature accurately captures current practice and gaps; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Renewable generation exhibits significant temporal variability that cannot be captured by capacity metrics alone.
    Invoked throughout the synthesis when contrasting chronological adequacy with installed capacity.
  • domain assumption Standard power-system reliability indices compress temporal and spatial risk information.
    Used to justify the claim that inherited indices are poorly suited.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5560 in / 1335 out tokens · 22324 ms · 2026-05-09T23:58:53.062334+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

242 extracted references · 242 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    Ronald N Allan et al.Reliability evaluation of power systems. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Improving reliability and sta- bility of the power systems: A comprehensive review on the role of energy storage systems to enhance flexibility

    Muhammad Muzammal Islam, Tianyou Yu, Giovanni Gi- annoccaro, Yang Mi, Massimo La Scala, Mohammad Ra- jabi Nasab, and Jie Wang. Improving reliability and sta- bility of the power systems: A comprehensive review on the role of energy storage systems to enhance flexibility. IEEE Access, 12:152738–152765, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Resilient energy transition in wildfire-prone regions: A multi-stage invest- ment optimization.International Journal of Electrical Power&Energy Systems, 172:111060, 2025

    Mohannad Alhazmi, Bohan Zhang, Thomas Tongxin Li, Huizu Lin, Chenlu Yang, and Xi Cheng. Resilient energy transition in wildfire-prone regions: A multi-stage invest- ment optimization.International Journal of Electrical Power&Energy Systems, 172:111060, 2025

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Power network reliability framework for integrating cable design and age- ing.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33(2):1521– 1532, 2017

    Konstantinos Kopsidas and Shuran Liu. Power network reliability framework for integrating cable design and age- ing.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33(2):1521– 1532, 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Critical load restora- tion using distributed energy resources for resilient power distribution system.IEEE Transactions on power systems, 34(1):52–63, 2018

    Shiva Poudel and Anamika Dubey. Critical load restora- tion using distributed energy resources for resilient power distribution system.IEEE Transactions on power systems, 34(1):52–63, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Evaluating the value of batteries in microgrid electricity systems using an improved energy systems model.Energy Conversion and Management, 89:458–472, 2015

    Eric Hittinger, Ted Wiley, John Kluza, and Jay Whitacre. Evaluating the value of batteries in microgrid electricity systems using an improved energy systems model.Energy Conversion and Management, 89:458–472, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Defining a microgrid using ieee 2030.7.Business&Technology Surveillance, 2019

    Douglas R Danley. Defining a microgrid using ieee 2030.7.Business&Technology Surveillance, 2019

    work page 2030

  8. [8]

    Microgrids with energy storage systems as a means to increase power resilience: An ap- plication to office buildings.Energy, 172:1005–1015, 2019

    Enrique Rosales-Asensio, Miguel de Simón-Martín, David Borge-Diez, Jorge Juan Blanes-Peiró, and Anto- nio Colmenar-Santos. Microgrids with energy storage systems as a means to increase power resilience: An ap- plication to office buildings.Energy, 172:1005–1015, 2019

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    An adaptive dynamic power manage- ment approach for enhancing operation of microgrid with grid ancillary services.Renewable Energy, 219:119413, 2023

    Vijayakumar Gali, Prashant Kumar Jamwal, Nitin Gupta, and Ajay Kumar. An adaptive dynamic power manage- ment approach for enhancing operation of microgrid with grid ancillary services.Renewable Energy, 219:119413, 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Long-term microgrid expansion planning with resilience and environmental benefits using deep reinforcement learning.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 191:114068, 2024

    Kexin Pang, Jian Zhou, Stamatis Tsianikas, David W Coit, and Yizhong Ma. Long-term microgrid expansion planning with resilience and environmental benefits using deep reinforcement learning.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 191:114068, 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    A new deterministic approach for transmis- sion system planning in deregulated electricity markets

    Alfonso Capasso, A Cervone, Regina Lamedica, and Laura Palagi. A new deterministic approach for transmis- sion system planning in deregulated electricity markets. International Journal of Electrical Power&Energy Sys- tems, 73:1070–1078, 2015

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Seamless transition of microgrids operation from grid-connected to islanded mode.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(3):2106– 2114, 2019

    Mohyedin Ganjian-Aboukheili, Majid Shahabi, Qobad Shafiee, and Josep M Guerrero. Seamless transition of microgrids operation from grid-connected to islanded mode.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(3):2106– 2114, 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Saeed Peyghami, Frede Blaabjerg, and Peter Palensky. Incorporating power electronic converters reliability into modern power system reliability analysis.IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 9(2):1668–1681, 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    A re- view on microgrids’ challenges & perspectives.IEEE Access, 9:166502–166517, 2021

    Muhammad Hammad Saeed, Wang Fangzong, Basheer Ahmed Kalwar, and Sajid Iqbal. A re- view on microgrids’ challenges & perspectives.IEEE Access, 9:166502–166517, 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Dy- namic grid stability in low carbon power systems with minimum inertia.Renewable Energy, 210:486–506, 2023

    Faraedoon Ahmed, Dlzar Al Kez, Seán McLoone, Robert James Best, Ché Cameron, and Aoife Foley. Dy- namic grid stability in low carbon power systems with minimum inertia.Renewable Energy, 210:486–506, 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Reliability aspects in micro- grid design and planning: Status and power electronics- induced challenges.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 159:112127, 2022

    Monika Sandelic, Saeed Peyghami, Ariya Sangwong- wanich, and Frede Blaabjerg. Reliability aspects in micro- grid design and planning: Status and power electronics- induced challenges.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 159:112127, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Reli- ability analysis of power systems integrated with high- penetration of power converters.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36(3):1998–2009, 2020

    Bowen Zhang, Mengqi Wang, and Wencong Su. Reli- ability analysis of power systems integrated with high- penetration of power converters.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36(3):1998–2009, 2020

    work page 1998

  18. [18]

    Dynamic optimal power flow for isolated mi- crogrid incorporating renewable energy sources.Energy, 264:126065, 2023

    M Basu. Dynamic optimal power flow for isolated mi- crogrid incorporating renewable energy sources.Energy, 264:126065, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    A review of protection systems for distribution networks embedded with renewable generation.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58:1308–1317, 2016

    Joel Kennedy, Phil Ciufo, and Ashish Agalgaonkar. A review of protection systems for distribution networks embedded with renewable generation.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58:1308–1317, 2016

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Coordination of bess and pv system with bidirec- tional power control strategy in ac microgrid.Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 34:101029, 2023

    Rohit Nandi, Manoj Tripathy, and Chandra Prakash Gupta. Coordination of bess and pv system with bidirec- tional power control strategy in ac microgrid.Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 34:101029, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    A review on issues and approaches for microgrid protection.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67:988–997, 2017

    Belwin J Brearley and R Raja Prabu. A review on issues and approaches for microgrid protection.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67:988–997, 2017

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Fault-current injection strategies of inverter-based gen- eration for fast voltage recovery.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37(2):1543–1553, 2021

    Stefan Stankovi´c, Thierry Van Cutsem, and Lennart Söder. Fault-current injection strategies of inverter-based gen- eration for fast voltage recovery.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37(2):1543–1553, 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Cost-effective reliability level in 100% renewables-based standalone mi- crogrids considering investment and expected energy not served costs.Energy, 311:133426, 2024

    Nallainathan Sakthivelnathan, Ali Arefi, Christopher Lund, Ali Mehrizi-Sani, and SM Muyeen. Cost-effective reliability level in 100% renewables-based standalone mi- crogrids considering investment and expected energy not served costs.Energy, 311:133426, 2024. 50

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Re- liability evaluation of standalone microgrid based on sequential monte carlo simulation method.Energies, 15(18):6706, 2022

    Zhipeng Weng, Jinghua Zhou, and Zhengdong Zhan. Re- liability evaluation of standalone microgrid based on sequential monte carlo simulation method.Energies, 15(18):6706, 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Reliability assessment of distribution system with the integration of renewable dis- tributed generation.Applied energy, 185:158–171, 2017

    T Adefarati and RC Bansal. Reliability assessment of distribution system with the integration of renewable dis- tributed generation.Applied energy, 185:158–171, 2017

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Multi-objective optimization of autonomous microgrids with reliability consideration.Energies, 14(15):4466, 2021

    Maël Riou, Florian Dupriez-Robin, Dominique Grondin, Christophe Le Loup, Michel Benne, and Quoc T Tran. Multi-objective optimization of autonomous microgrids with reliability consideration.Energies, 14(15):4466, 2021

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Gabriel Veilleux, Tanai Potisat, Daniel Pezim, Christian Ribback, Jarmo Ling, Adam Krysztofi´nski, Afaq Ahmed, Jessica Papenheim, Astrid Mon Pineda, Siva Sembian, et al. Techno-economic analysis of microgrid projects for rural electrification: A systematic approach to the redesign of koh jik off-grid case study.Energy for Sus- tainable Development, 54:1–13, 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Optimal design and techno-economic analysis of an autonomous small isolated microgrid aiming at high res penetration.Energy, 116:364–379, 2016

    Dimitrios Thomas, Olivier Deblecker, and Christos S Ioakimidis. Optimal design and techno-economic analysis of an autonomous small isolated microgrid aiming at high res penetration.Energy, 116:364–379, 2016

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Probabilis- tic techno-economic design of isolated microgrid.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38(6):5267–5277, 2022

    S Berclin Jeyaprabha and Jovica V Milanovi´c. Probabilis- tic techno-economic design of isolated microgrid.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38(6):5267–5277, 2022

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    A case study of optimal design and techno-economic analysis of an islanded ac microgrid

    MS Elborlsy, RM Mostafa, Mohamed A Ghalib, Shimaa Barakat, and HE Keshta. A case study of optimal design and techno-economic analysis of an islanded ac microgrid. Scientific Reports, 15(1):12397, 2025

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Hybrid renewable energy systems design and techno- economic analysis for isolated rural microgrid using homer.Energy, page 136442, 2025

    Subhash Yadav, Pradeep Kumar, and Ashwani Kumar. Hybrid renewable energy systems design and techno- economic analysis for isolated rural microgrid using homer.Energy, page 136442, 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Md Feroz Ali, Diganto Biswas, Md Rafiqul Islam Sheikh, Ashraf Hossain Sanvi, and AHM Ferdous. Evaluating techno-economic viability and performance of a renew- able energy hybrid microgrid for electrifying remote com- munities in bangladesh.Journal of Renewable and Sus- tainable Energy, 17(4), 2025

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Reliability-constrained optimal design of multi- carrier microgrid.International Transactions on Electri- cal Energy Systems, 29(12):e12131, 2019

    Vahid Amir, Mahdi Azimian, and Azam Sadat Razav- izadeh. Reliability-constrained optimal design of multi- carrier microgrid.International Transactions on Electri- cal Energy Systems, 29(12):e12131, 2019

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    A reliability-aware chance-constrained battery sizing method for island mi- crogrid.Energy, 251:123978, 2022

    Da Huo, Marcos Santos, Ilias Sarantakos, Markus Resch, Neal Wade, and David Greenwood. A reliability-aware chance-constrained battery sizing method for island mi- crogrid.Energy, 251:123978, 2022

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    An economic-reliability security-constrained optimal dispatch for microgrids

    Vahid Sarfi and Hanif Livani. An economic-reliability security-constrained optimal dispatch for microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33(6):6777–6786, 2018

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Hybrid renewable microgrid optimization techniques: A review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82:2039–2052, 2018

    Samir M Dawoud, Xiangning Lin, and Merfat I Okba. Hybrid renewable microgrid optimization techniques: A review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82:2039–2052, 2018

    work page 2039

  37. [37]

    Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi and Senthil Krishnamurthy. Appraisal of viable optimization techniques for efficient design and control planning of renewable energy-based microgrid systems.Computers and Electrical Engineer- ing, 120:109652, 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Review of opti- mization techniques for relay coordination in considera- tion with adaptive schemes of microgrid.Electric Power Systems Research, 230:110240, 2024

    Prashant Kumar and Ankur Singh Rana. Review of opti- mization techniques for relay coordination in considera- tion with adaptive schemes of microgrid.Electric Power Systems Research, 230:110240, 2024

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    A review of highly reliable operation technologies and evaluation tech- niques for microgrids in remote rural areas

    Huayong Ou, Min Xu, Hui Huang, Zengjie Wu, Xiaoteng Liu, Caijian Wen, and Wenguang Huang. A review of highly reliable operation technologies and evaluation tech- niques for microgrids in remote rural areas. In2023 8th Asia Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering (ACPEE), pages 125–131. IEEE, 2023

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    A compre- hensive review of reliability assessment methodologies for grid-connected photovoltaic systems.IET Renewable Power Generation, 17(7):1859–1880, 2023

    Smriti Singh, RK Saket, and Baseem Khan. A compre- hensive review of reliability assessment methodologies for grid-connected photovoltaic systems.IET Renewable Power Generation, 17(7):1859–1880, 2023

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Power system reliability assessment—a review on analy- sis and evaluation methods.Journal of Energy Systems, 6(3):401–419, 2022

    Selahattin Garip, ¸ Saban Özdemir, and Necmi Altın. Power system reliability assessment—a review on analy- sis and evaluation methods.Journal of Energy Systems, 6(3):401–419, 2022

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Distributed energy resources based microgrid: Review of architecture, control, and reliability.IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 57(3):2223–2235, 2021

    Abir Muhtadi, Dilip Pandit, Nga Nguyen, and Joydeep Mitra. Distributed energy resources based microgrid: Review of architecture, control, and reliability.IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 57(3):2223–2235, 2021

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    A comprehensve review on the modern power system reliability assessment.International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 11(4):1734–1747, 2021

    SB Aruna, D Suchitra, R Rajarajeswari, and S George Fernandez. A comprehensve review on the modern power system reliability assessment.International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 11(4):1734–1747, 2021

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Reliability evaluation in distribution net- works with microgrids: Review and classification of the literature.Energies, 13(23):6189, 2020

    Jose L Lopez-Prado, Jorge I Vélez, and Guisselle A Garcia-Llinas. Reliability evaluation in distribution net- works with microgrids: Review and classification of the literature.Energies, 13(23):6189, 2020

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Updated recommendations for the cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness.bmj, 384, 2024

    Chantelle Garritty, Candyce Hamel, Marialena Trivella, Gerald Gartlehner, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Declan Devane, Chris Kamel, Ursula Griebler, and Valerie J King. Updated recommendations for the cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness.bmj, 384, 2024. 51

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    James, Robin Chatters, and Ruth Wong

    Eva Kaltenthaler, Katy Cooper, Abdullah Pandor, Mar- rissa Martyn-St. James, Robin Chatters, and Ruth Wong. The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies.BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1):108, 2016

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Amstar 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic re- views that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.bmj, 358, 2017

    Beverley J Shea, Barnaby C Reeves, George Wells, Micere Thuku, Candyce Hamel, Julian Moran, David Mo- her, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Elizabeth Kristjansson, et al. Amstar 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic re- views that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.bmj, 358, 2017

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Wasted research when systematic re- views fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer.BMC Medicine, 14(1):8, 2016

    Perrine Créquit, Ludovic Trinquart, Amélie Yavchitz, and Philippe Ravaud. Wasted research when systematic re- views fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer.BMC Medicine, 14(1):8, 2016

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? a systematic review of reviews and primary studies.Research Synthesis Methods, 15(1):2–20, 2024

    Michelle M Haby, Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto, Jenny Yeon Hee Kim, Sasha Peiris, Cristián Mansilla, Marcela Torres, Diego Emmanuel Guerrero-Magaña, and Ludovic Reveiz. What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? a systematic review of reviews and primary studies.Research Synthesis Methods, 15(1):2–20, 2024

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Are systematic reviews up- to-date at the time of publication?Systematic reviews, 2:1–6, 2013

    Elaine M Beller, Joyce Kee-Hsin Chen, Una Li-Hsiang Wang, and Paul P Glasziou. Are systematic reviews up- to-date at the time of publication?Systematic reviews, 2:1–6, 2013

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    Ex- pediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews.Implementation Science, 5:1–10, 2010

    Rebecca Ganann, Donna Ciliska, and Helen Thomas. Ex- pediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews.Implementation Science, 5:1–10, 2010

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    A rapid re- view on community connected microgrids.Sustainability, 13(12):6753, 2021

    Moiz Masood Syed and Gregory M Morrison. A rapid re- view on community connected microgrids.Sustainability, 13(12):6753, 2021

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    A com- prehensive review of ai-driven approaches for smart grid stability and reliability.Renewable and Sustainable En- ergy Reviews, 226:116424, 2026

    Mehrnaz Ahmadi, Hamed Aly, and Jason Gu. A com- prehensive review of ai-driven approaches for smart grid stability and reliability.Renewable and Sustainable En- ergy Reviews, 226:116424, 2026

    work page 2026

  54. [54]

    Artificial intelligence for microgrids design, control, and mainte- nance: A comprehensive review and prospects.Energy conversion and management

    Mojtaba Hadi, Elhoussin Elbouchikhi, Zhibin Zhou, Ab- delhakim Saim, Miadreza Shafie Khah, Pierluigi Siano, Hesam Rahbarimagham, and Pau Martí Colom. Artificial intelligence for microgrids design, control, and mainte- nance: A comprehensive review and prospects.Energy conversion and management. X, 27(article 101056), 2025

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Taraneh Ghanbarzadeh, Daryoush Habibi, and Asma Aziz. Addressing reliability challenges in generation capacity planning under high penetration of renewable energy resources and storage solutions: A review.Re- newable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 212:115461, 2025

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Binaya Kumar Malika, Vivekananda Pattanaik, Subhasis Panda, Pravat Kumar Rout, Binod Kumar Sahu, Mohit Bajaj, V ojtech Blazek, and Lukas Prokop. A critical re- view of distribution system planning: Optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation and energy storage de- vices in microgrids.Energy Strategy Reviews, 62:101947, 2025

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    A review on micro- grid optimization with meta-heuristic techniques: Scopes, trends and recommendation.Energy Strategy Reviews, 51:101298, 2024

    Afifa Akter, Ehsanul Islam Zafir, Nazia Hasan Dana, Rahul Joysoyal, Subrata K Sarker, Li Li, SM Muyeen, Sajal K Das, and Innocent Kamwa. A review on micro- grid optimization with meta-heuristic techniques: Scopes, trends and recommendation.Energy Strategy Reviews, 51:101298, 2024

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    A comprehensive review on optimization of hybrid re- newable energy systems using various optimization tech- niques.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 176:113192, 2023

    M Thirunavukkarasu, Yashwant Sawle, and Himadri Lala. A comprehensive review on optimization of hybrid re- newable energy systems using various optimization tech- niques.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 176:113192, 2023

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Powering up microgrids: A compre- hensive review of innovative and intelligent protection approaches for enhanced reliability.Energy Reports, 10:1899–1924, 2023

    Feras Alasali, Saad M Saad, Abdelaziz Salah Saidi, Awni Itradat, William Holderbaum, Naser El-Naily, and Fa- tima F Elkuwafi. Powering up microgrids: A compre- hensive review of innovative and intelligent protection approaches for enhanced reliability.Energy Reports, 10:1899–1924, 2023

    work page 1924

  60. [60]

    Ishanki De Mel, Oleksiy V Klymenko, and Michael Short. Balancing accuracy and complexity in optimisation mod- els of distributed energy systems and microgrids with optimal power flow: A review.Sustainable Energy Tech- nologies and Assessments, 52:102066, 2022

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    A systematic review of optimal planning and deployment of distributed generation and energy storage systems in power networks.Journal of Energy Storage, 56:105937, 2022

    Dong Zhang, GM Shafiullah, Choton K Das, and Kok Wai Wong. A systematic review of optimal planning and deployment of distributed generation and energy storage systems in power networks.Journal of Energy Storage, 56:105937, 2022

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    PS Meera and S Hemamalini. Reliability assessment and enhancement of distribution networks integrated with renewable distributed generators: A review.Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 54:102812, 2022

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    An overview of the challenges of solar power integration in isolated industrial microgrids with reliability constraints

    Louis Polleux, Gilles Guerassimoff, Jean-Paul Marmorat, John Sandoval-Moreno, and Thierry Schuhler. An overview of the challenges of solar power integration in isolated industrial microgrids with reliability constraints. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 155:111955, 2022

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    System modeling and reliabil- ity assessment of microgrids: a review.Sustainability, 14(1):126, 2021

    Masood Ibni Nazir, Ikhlaq Hussain, Aijaz Ahmad, Irfan Khan, and Ayan Mallik. System modeling and reliabil- ity assessment of microgrids: a review.Sustainability, 14(1):126, 2021

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Xiaodong Liang, Md Abu Saaklayen, Mosayeb Af- shari Igder, Shah Mohammad Rezwanul Haque Shawon, Sherif O Faried, and Mehrnoosh Janbakhsh. Planning 52 and service restoration through microgrid formation and soft open points for distribution network modernization: A review.IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 58(2):1843–1857, 2022

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    An overview on the reliability of modern power electronic based power systems.IEEE Open Journal of Power Elec- tronics, 1:34–50, 2020

    Saeed Peyghami, Peter Palensky, and Frede Blaabjerg. An overview on the reliability of modern power electronic based power systems.IEEE Open Journal of Power Elec- tronics, 1:34–50, 2020

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    A survey of reliability assessment techniques for modern distribution networks.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91:344–357, 2018

    Alberto Escalera, Barry Hayes, and Milan Prodanovi´c. A survey of reliability assessment techniques for modern distribution networks.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91:344–357, 2018

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Optimal integration and planning of renewable distributed generation in the power distribution networks: A review of analytical techniques

    Ali Ehsan and Qiang Yang. Optimal integration and planning of renewable distributed generation in the power distribution networks: A review of analytical techniques. Applied Energy, 210:44–59, 2018

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    Optimal sizing and siting techniques for distributed generation in distribution systems: A review.Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 57:111–130, 2016

    Prem Prakash and Dheeraj K Khatod. Optimal sizing and siting techniques for distributed generation in distribution systems: A review.Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 57:111–130, 2016

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Computational optimization techniques applied to microgrids planning: A review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48:413–424, 2015

    Carlos Gamarra and Josep M Guerrero. Computational optimization techniques applied to microgrids planning: A review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48:413–424, 2015

    work page 2015

  71. [71]

    Smart grids and renewable energy systems: Perspectives and grid integration challenges

    Muhammad Khalid. Smart grids and renewable energy systems: Perspectives and grid integration challenges. Energy Strategy Reviews, 51:101299, 2024

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Towards risk-aware real-time security constrained eco- nomic dispatch: A tailored deep reinforcement learn- ing approach.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 39(2):3972–3986, 2023

    Jianxiong Hu, Yujian Ye, Yi Tang, and Goran Strbac. Towards risk-aware real-time security constrained eco- nomic dispatch: A tailored deep reinforcement learn- ing approach.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 39(2):3972–3986, 2023

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Haipeng Chen, Lin Gao, and Zhong Zhang. Multi- objective optimal scheduling of a microgrid with uncer- tainties of renewable power generation considering user satisfaction.International Journal of Electrical Power& Energy Systems, 131:107142, 2021

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Chandrabhanu Opathella, Ayman Elkasrawy, Amr Adel Mohamed, and Bala Venkatesh. Milp formulation for generation and storage asset sizing and sitting for reliabil- ity constrained system planning.International Journal of Electrical Power&Energy Systems, 116:105529, 2020

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Impact of battery en- ergy storage system integration on microgrid reliability improvement

    Takele Ferede Agajie, Baseem Khan, Amoussou Isaac, and Yayehyirad Ayalew Awoke. Impact of battery en- ergy storage system integration on microgrid reliability improvement. InActive Electrical Distribution Network, pages 81–94. Elsevier, 2022

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Optimal planning of energy storage in distribution feeders considering econ- omy and reliability.Energy Technology, 12(7):2400200, 2024

    Liangbin Xie, Yue Xiang, Xiao Xu, Shiqian Wang, Qi- uyan Li, Fang Liu, and Junyong Liu. Optimal planning of energy storage in distribution feeders considering econ- omy and reliability.Energy Technology, 12(7):2400200, 2024

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Re- liability evaluation of electric distribution network with distributed generation integrated.International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 14(5):306–319, 2021

    Ali Mohammed Jaleel and Mohammed Kdair Abd. Re- liability evaluation of electric distribution network with distributed generation integrated.International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 14(5):306–319, 2021

    work page 2021

  78. [78]

    Op- timal planning of distributed energy storage systems in ac- tive distribution networks embedding grid reconfiguration

    Mostafa Nick, Rachid Cherkaoui, and Mario Paolone. Op- timal planning of distributed energy storage systems in ac- tive distribution networks embedding grid reconfiguration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33(2):1577–1590, 2017

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    Optimal planning of renewable energy-integrated distribution sys- tem considering uncertainties.IEEE Access, 7:164887– 164907, 2019

    Mohamed R Elkadeem, Mohamed Abd Elaziz, Zia Ul- lah, Shaorong Wang, and Swellam W Sharshir. Optimal planning of renewable energy-integrated distribution sys- tem considering uncertainties.IEEE Access, 7:164887– 164907, 2019

    work page 2019

  80. [80]

    Mohammad-Reza Yaghoubi-Nia, Hamed Hashemi- Dezaki, and Abolfazl Halvaei Niasar. Optimal stochastic scenario-based allocation of smart grids’ renewable and non-renewable distributed generation units and protective devices.Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assess- ments, 44:101033, 2021

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.