pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20538 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Different perspectives on the exact factorization for photon-electron-nuclear systems

Claudia Magi , Peter Schuerger , David Lauvergnat , Federica Agostini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords exact factorizationmolecular polaritonsnonadiabatic dynamicsstrong light-matter couplingphoton-electron-nuclear systemsmulti-component wavefunctioncavity-modified chemistry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Exact factorization of multi-component wavefunctions offers a way to evaluate nonadiabatic dynamics methods for systems of photons, electrons, and nuclei.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors apply the exact factorization to the combined wavefunction of photons, electrons, and nuclei in order to examine the dynamics that arise when light and molecular excitations couple strongly. This produces molecular polaritons whose behavior is simulated with standard nonadiabatic molecular dynamics techniques. By comparing those techniques against the exact factorization on simple models, the work identifies the assumptions that remain valid and those that do not. A reader would care because many current simulations of cavity-modified chemistry rely on the same techniques, and knowing their range of reliability affects predictions of altered reaction rates or spectra.

Core claim

We employ the exact factorization of a multi-component wavefunction to analyze the dynamics of interacting photons, electrons and nuclei. We consider physical situations emerging in the regime of strong coupling between light excitations and molecular electronic excitations, giving rise to the so-called molecular polaritons. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics techniques, routinely used in the field of chemical physics, have been often employed to simulate photophysical and photochemical phenomena in the presence of molecular polaritons. In this work, we analyze the foundations of these techniques in the eye of the exact factorization and we assess their performance on illustrative model studies

What carries the argument

The exact factorization of the total wavefunction into a marginal wavefunction describing nuclear and photonic motion and a conditional electronic wavefunction that defines effective potentials and nonadiabatic couplings.

If this is right

  • Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics methods can be benchmarked for accuracy against the exact factorization when photons are included explicitly.
  • The strong-coupling regime introduces additional couplings that must be checked for consistency with the exact potentials derived from factorization.
  • Performance on illustrative models indicates which approximations preserve the correct polariton dynamics and which do not.
  • Foundational assumptions of the techniques become visible once the total wavefunction is factored into marginal and conditional parts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same diagnostic could be applied to larger molecules to map the boundaries of validity for existing simulation codes.
  • Results on models suggest that new methods might need to retain photon-nuclear correlations that standard nonadiabatic schemes discard.
  • The perspective connects to questions of how cavity fields modify relaxation pathways without requiring full quantum-electrodynamic treatments.

Load-bearing premise

That the exact factorization framework remains a useful diagnostic tool for assessing nonadiabatic molecular dynamics methods when photons are treated as an explicit degree of freedom in the strong-coupling regime.

What would settle it

A concrete model calculation in which the time-dependent nuclear and photonic densities obtained from the exact factorization differ quantitatively from those produced by the nonadiabatic methods under test.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20538 by Claudia Magi, David Lauvergnat, Federica Agostini, Peter Schuerger.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representation of a single mode cavity with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Left panels: bare adiabatic potential energy curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Energy-position distribution of TSH trajectories (left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time trace of the average photon number (top plots) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Marginal density in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Polaritonic potential energy curves with the distribu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: show results analogous to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Time trace of the average photon number (top plots) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Same as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We employ the exact factorization of a multi-component wavefunction to analyze the dynamics of interacting photons, electrons and nuclei. We consider physical situations emerging in the regime of strong coupling between light excitations and molecular - electronic excitations, giving rise to the so-called molecular polaritons. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics techniques, routinely used in the field of chemical physics, have been often employed to simulate photophysical and photochemical phenomena in the presence of molecular polaritons. In this work, we analyze the foundations of these techniques in the eye of the exact factorization and we assess their performance on illustrative model studies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper employs the exact factorization of the multi-component photon-electron-nuclear wavefunction to analyze dynamics in the strong light-matter coupling regime that produces molecular polaritons. It derives the corresponding EF equations, identifies effective potentials and forces, and uses these as a reference to assess the foundations and performance of standard nonadiabatic molecular dynamics approximations on low-dimensional illustrative models, treating the bosonic photon field as an additional continuous degree of freedom.

Significance. If the derivations and model comparisons are accurate, the work supplies a concrete diagnostic framework for evaluating NAMD methods when photons are treated explicitly. This is useful for polariton chemistry simulations, as it directly contrasts approximate forces and potentials against an exact EF benchmark on tractable models, thereby clarifying which approximations remain reliable in the strong-coupling limit.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the specific NAMD methods (e.g., surface hopping variants or Ehrenfest) that are benchmarked, to orient readers before the model studies.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending acceptance. We appreciate the recognition that the exact factorization provides a concrete diagnostic framework for evaluating nonadiabatic molecular dynamics methods when photons are treated explicitly in the strong-coupling regime.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper applies the established exact factorization (EF) framework to photon-electron-nuclear systems by treating photons as an additional continuous degree of freedom, derives the corresponding EF equations, and uses the resulting exact potentials and forces as a reference to assess approximate nonadiabatic dynamics methods on low-dimensional model systems. All steps follow the standard EF construction without introducing fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claims to the paper's own inputs. Model comparisons serve as independent checks against exact references, rendering the work self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. Standard quantum mechanics and wavefunction factorization are presupposed but not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5396 in / 986 out tokens · 23712 ms · 2026-05-09T23:17:50.221546+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    on-resonance

    + ∆ (21) the photon Hamiltonian is the sum of the kinetic energy term− 1 2 ∂2 ∂q 2 and of ˆVP (q) = 1 2 ω2q2 0 0 1 2 ω2q2 (22) and the photon-matter interaction Hamiltonian is mod- eled as ˆHP M(q, R) = ω g q ZR ω g q µ ω g q µ ω g q ZR (23) In this representation, the diagonal elements ofˆHBO(R), i.e., the diabatic potential energy curves, are parabolas ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Modifying chemical landscapes by coupling to vacuum fields,

    J. A. Hutchison, T. Schwartz, C. Genet, E. Devaux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Modifying chemical landscapes by coupling to vacuum fields,”Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., vol. 51, p. 1592?1596, Jan. 2012

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Hybrid light-matter states in a molecu- lar and material science perspective,

    T. W. Ebbesen, “Hybrid light-matter states in a molecu- lar and material science perspective,”Acc. Chem. Res., vol. 49, p. 2403, 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Efficient and tun- able photochemical charge transfer via long-lived bloch surface wave polaritons,

    K. Rashidi, E. Michail, B. Salcido-Santacruz, Y. Paudel, V. M. Menon, and M. Y. Sfeir, “Efficient and tun- able photochemical charge transfer via long-lived bloch surface wave polaritons,”Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 20, p. 1618?1624, Aug. 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Unveiling the role of dark states in dynamic control of azopyrrole photoisomer- ization by light-matter interaction,

    P. Garg, J. Singh, A. K. Gaur, S. Venkataramani, C. Schäfer, and J. George, “Unveiling the role of dark states in dynamic control of azopyrrole photoisomer- ization by light-matter interaction,”Commun. Chem., vol. 8, p. 192, July 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Manipulating azobenzene photoisomerization through strong light-molecule coupling,

    J. Fregoni, G. Granucci, E. Coccia, M. Persico, and S. Corni, “Manipulating azobenzene photoisomerization through strong light-molecule coupling,”Nat. Commun, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 4688, 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Photochemical ini- tiation of polariton-mediated exciton propagation,

    I. Sokolovskii and G. Groenhof, “Photochemical ini- tiation of polariton-mediated exciton propagation,” Nanophotonics, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 2687–2694, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Identifying vibrations that control non-adiabaticrelaxationofpolaritonsinstronglycoupled molecule-cavity systems,

    R. H. Tichauer, D. Morozov, I. Sokolovskii, J. J. Toppari, and G. Groenhof, “Identifying vibrations that control non-adiabaticrelaxationofpolaritonsinstronglycoupled molecule-cavity systems,”J. Phys. Chem. Lett., vol. 13, no. 27, pp. 6259–6267, 2022

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Polari- tonic chemistry with organic molecules,

    J. Feist, J. Galego, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, “Polari- tonic chemistry with organic molecules,”ACSPhotonics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 205–216, 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Theoreti- cal challenges in polaritonic chemistry,

    J. Fregoni, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. Feist, “Theoreti- cal challenges in polaritonic chemistry,”ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1096–1107, 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Molec- ular polaritonics: Chemical dynamics under strong light- matter coupling,

    T. E. Li, B. Cui, J. E. Subotnik, and A. Nitzan, “Molec- ular polaritonics: Chemical dynamics under strong light- matter coupling,”Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., vol. 73, pp. 43–71, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Theoretical advances in polariton chemistry and molecular cavity quantum electrodynam- ics,

    A. Mandal, M. A. Taylor, B. M. Weight, E. R. Koessler, X. Li, and P. Huo, “Theoretical advances in polariton chemistry and molecular cavity quantum electrodynam- ics,”Chem. Rev., vol. 123, no. 16, pp. 9786–9879, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (qed) chemistry,

    J. Flick, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, “Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (qed) chemistry,” PNAS, vol. 114, pp. 3026–3034, Mar. 2017

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Po- lariton chemistry: controlling molecular dynamics with optical cavities,

    R. F. Ribeiro, L. A. Martínez-Martínez, M. Du, J. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, and J. Yuen-Zhou, “Po- lariton chemistry: controlling molecular dynamics with optical cavities,”Chem. Sci., vol. 9, no. 30, pp. 6325– 6339, 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Yuen-Zhou, N

    J. Yuen-Zhou, N. C. Giebink, and R. F. Ribeiro, eds., Polariton chemistry. Nashville, TN: John Wiley & Sons, Jan. 2026

    work page 2026

  16. [16]

    Understand- ing polaritonic chemistry from ab initio quantum elec- trodynamics,

    M. Ruggenthaler, D. Sidler, and A. Rubio, “Understand- ing polaritonic chemistry from ab initio quantum elec- trodynamics,”Chem. Rev., vol. 123, no. 19, pp. 11191– 11229, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Light?matter interaction hamiltonians in cavity quantum electrody- namics,

    M. A. D. Taylor, A. Mandal, and P. Huo, “Light?matter interaction hamiltonians in cavity quantum electrody- namics,”Chem. Phys. Rev., vol. 6, p. 011305, Feb. 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    From a quantum-electrodynamical light-matter description to novel spectroscopies,

    M. Ruggenthaler, N. Tancogne-Dejean, J. Flick, H. Ap- pel, and A. Rubio, “From a quantum-electrodynamical light-matter description to novel spectroscopies,”Nat. Rev. Chem., vol. 2, p. 0118, 2018

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Cavity control of molecular spectroscopy and photophysics,

    B. Gu, Y. Gu, V. Y. Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, “Cavity control of molecular spectroscopy and photophysics,” AccountsofChemicalResearch, vol.56, no.20, pp.2753– 2762, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Cavity femtochemistry: Manipulating nonadiabatic dynamics at 17 avoided crossings,

    M. Kowalewski, K. Bennett, and S. Mukamel, “Cavity femtochemistry: Manipulating nonadiabatic dynamics at 17 avoided crossings,”J. Phys. Chem. Lett., vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 2050–2054, 2016

    work page 2050

  21. [21]

    Coupled cluster cavity Born-Oppenheimer approxima- tion for electronic strong coupling,

    S. Angelico, T. S. Haugland, E. Ronca, and H. Koch, “Coupled cluster cavity Born-Oppenheimer approxima- tion for electronic strong coupling,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 159, no. 21, p. 214112, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Molecular orbital theory in cavity QED environments,

    R. R. Riso, T. S. Haugland, E. Ronca, and H. Koch, “Molecular orbital theory in cavity QED environments,” Nat. Commun., vol. 13, p. 1368, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Coupled cluster theory for molecular polaritons: Changing ground and excited states,

    T. S. Haugland, E. Ronca, E. F. Kjøonstad, A. Rubio, and H. Koch, “Coupled cluster theory for molecular polaritons: Changing ground and excited states,”Phys. Rev. X, vol. 10, 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Shining light on the microscopic resonant mechanism responsible for cavity-mediated chemical reactivity,

    C. Schäfer, J. Flick, E. Ronca, P. Narang, and A. Rubio, “Shining light on the microscopic resonant mechanism responsible for cavity-mediated chemical reactivity,”Nat. Commun., vol. 13, Dec. 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Cavity quantum electrodynamical chern insulator: Towards light-induced quantized anomalous hall effect in graphene,

    X. Wang, E. Ronca, and M. A. Sentef, “Cavity quantum electrodynamical chern insulator: Towards light-induced quantized anomalous hall effect in graphene,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 99, p. 235156, June 2019

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: Bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory,

    M. Ruggenthaler, J. Flick, C. Pellegrini, H. Appel, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, “Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: Bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 90, p. 012508, July 2014

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Cavity born?oppenheimer approximation for correlated electron?nuclear-photon systems,

    J. Flick, H. Appel, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Cavity born?oppenheimer approximation for correlated electron?nuclear-photon systems,”J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 13, pp. 1616–1625, Mar. 2017

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    On-the- fly cavity-molecular dynamics of vibrational polaritons,

    S. Wickramasinghe, A. Amini, and A. Mandal, “On-the- fly cavity-molecular dynamics of vibrational polaritons,” 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Ab initio linear-response approach to vibro-polaritons in the cavity born?oppenheimer approximation,

    J. Bonini and J. Flick, “Ab initio linear-response approach to vibro-polaritons in the cavity born?oppenheimer approximation,”J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 18, p. 2764?2773, Apr. 2022

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Cavity born?oppenheimer approximation for molecules and materials via electric field response,

    J. Bonini, I. Ahmadabadi, and J. Flick, “Cavity born?oppenheimer approximation for molecules and materials via electric field response,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 161, p. 154104, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Exciton energy transfer inside cavity?a benchmark study of polaritonic dynamics using the surface hopping method,

    P. K. De and A. Jain, “Exciton energy transfer inside cavity?a benchmark study of polaritonic dynamics using the surface hopping method,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 161, p. 054117, Aug. 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Quantum dynamicssimulationofexciton-polaritontransport,

    N. Krupp, G. Groenhof, and O. Vendrell, “Quantum dynamicssimulationofexciton-polaritontransport,” Nat. Commun., vol. 16, p. 5431, July 2025

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Benchmarking semiclassical and perturbative methods for real-time simulations of cavity-bound emission and interference,

    N. M. Hoffmann, C. Schäfer, N. Säkkinen, A. Rubio, H. Appel, and A. Kelly, “Benchmarking semiclassical and perturbative methods for real-time simulations of cavity-bound emission and interference,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 151, p. 244113, Dec. 2019

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Capturing vacuum fluctuations and photon correlations in cavity quantum electrodynamics with mul- titrajectory ehrenfest dynamics,

    N. M. Hoffmann, C. Schäfer, A. Rubio, A. Kelly, and H. Appel, “Capturing vacuum fluctuations and photon correlations in cavity quantum electrodynamics with mul- titrajectory ehrenfest dynamics,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 99, p. 063819, June 2019

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Effect of many modes on self-polarization and photochemical suppression in cavities,

    N. M. Hoffmann, L. Lacombe, A. Rubio, and N. T. Maitra, “Effect of many modes on self-polarization and photochemical suppression in cavities,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 153, p. 104103, 2020

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Ab initio molecular cavity quantum electrodynamics simulations using machine learning mod- els,

    D. Hu and P. Huo, “Ab initio molecular cavity quantum electrodynamics simulations using machine learning mod- els,”J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 19, p. 2353?2368, Mar. 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Non-hermitian molecu- lar dynamics simulations of exciton?polaritons in lossy cavities,

    I. Sokolovskii and G. Groenhof, “Non-hermitian molecu- lar dynamics simulations of exciton?polaritons in lossy cavities,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 160, p. 092501, Mar. 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Trajectory- based non-adiabatic simulations of the polariton relax- ation dynamics,

    D. Hu, B. X. K. Chng, W. Ying, and P. Huo, “Trajectory- based non-adiabatic simulations of the polariton relax- ation dynamics,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 162, p. 124113, Mar. 2025

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Multi-scale dynamics simulations of molecular polaritons: The effect of multiple cavity modes on polariton relaxation,

    R. H. Tichauer, J. Feist, and G. Groenhof, “Multi-scale dynamics simulations of molecular polaritons: The effect of multiple cavity modes on polariton relaxation,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 154, p. 104112, Mar. 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Coherent dynamics in cavity femtochem- istry: Application of the multi-configuration time- dependent hartree method,

    O. Vendrell, “Coherent dynamics in cavity femtochem- istry: Application of the multi-configuration time- dependent hartree method,”Chem. Phys., vol. 509, p. 55?65, June 2018

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Cavity frequency- dependent theory for vibrational polariton chemistry,

    X. Li, A. Mandal, and P. Huo, “Cavity frequency- dependent theory for vibrational polariton chemistry,” Nat. Commun., vol. 12, p. 1315, Feb. 2021

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Collective vibra- tional strong coupling effects on molecular vibrational relaxation and energy transfer: Numerical insights via cavity molecular dynamics simulations,

    T. E. Li, A. Nitzan, and J. E. Subotnik, “Collective vibra- tional strong coupling effects on molecular vibrational relaxation and energy transfer: Numerical insights via cavity molecular dynamics simulations,”Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., vol. 60, p. 15533?15540, June 2021

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Simu- lating the excited-state dynamics of polaritons with ab initio multiple spawning,

    B. Rana, E. G. Hohenstein, and T. J. Martínez, “Simu- lating the excited-state dynamics of polaritons with ab initio multiple spawning,”J. Phys. Chem. A, vol. 128, pp. 139–151, Dec. 2023

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Multidimensional quan- tum dynamical simulation of infrared spectra under po- laritonic vibrational strong coupling,

    Q. Yu and S. Hammes-Schiffer, “Multidimensional quan- tum dynamical simulation of infrared spectra under po- laritonic vibrational strong coupling,”J. Phys. Chem. Lett, vol. 13, p. 11253?11261, Nov. 2022

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Qm/mm modeling of vibrational polariton induced energy transfer and chemi- cal dynamics,

    T. E. Li and S. Hammes-Schiffer, “Qm/mm modeling of vibrational polariton induced energy transfer and chemi- cal dynamics,”J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 145, p. 377?384, Dec. 2022

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Cavity- induced modifications of molecular structure in the strong-coupling regime,

    J. Galego, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. Feist, “Cavity- induced modifications of molecular structure in the strong-coupling regime,”Phys. Rev. X, vol. 5, p. 041022, Nov 2015

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    Suppressing photochemical reactions with quantized light fields,

    J. Galego, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. Feist, “Suppressing photochemical reactions with quantized light fields,”Nat. Commun., vol. 7, p. 13841, Dec. 2016

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Many- molecule reaction triggered by a single photon in polari- tonic chemistry,

    J. Galego, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. Feist, “Many- molecule reaction triggered by a single photon in polari- tonic chemistry,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 119, p. 136001, Sep 2017

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Mean-field mixed quantum- classical approach for many-body quantum dynamics of exciton polaritons,

    P. Ghosh, A. Manjalingal, S. Wickramasinghe, S. R. Koshkaki, and A. Mandal, “Mean-field mixed quantum- classical approach for many-body quantum dynamics of exciton polaritons,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 112, Sept. 2025

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Different flavors of nonadiabatic molecular dynamics,

    F. Agostini and B. F. E. Curchod, “Different flavors of nonadiabatic molecular dynamics,”WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., vol. 9, p. e1417, 2019

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Exact fac- torization of the time-dependent electron-nuclear wave function,

    A. Abedi, N. T. Maitra, and E. K. U. Gross, “Exact fac- torization of the time-dependent electron-nuclear wave function,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 105, no. 12, p. 123002, 2010

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    Ultrafast dynamics with the exact factorization,

    F. Agostini and E. K. U. Gross, “Ultrafast dynamics with the exact factorization,”Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 94, p. 179, 2021

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Simulations of photoinduced processes with the exact 18 factorization: state of the art and perspectives,

    L. M. Ibele, E. S. Gil, E. V. Arribas, and F. Agostini, “Simulations of photoinduced processes with the exact 18 factorization: state of the art and perspectives,”Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., vol. 26, pp. 26693–26718, 2024

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Exact factor- izationofamany-bodywavefunctionbeyondtheelectron- nuclear problem,

    P. Schürger, S. Giarrusso, and F. Agostini, “Exact factor- izationofamany-bodywavefunctionbeyondtheelectron- nuclear problem,”arXiv:2602.23914 [physics.chem-ph], 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Light-matter interactions via the exact factorization approach,

    N. M. Hoffmann, H. Appel, A. Rubio, and N. Maitra, “Light-matter interactions via the exact factorization approach,”Euro. Phys. J. B, vol. 91, p. 180, 2018

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Shedding light on correlated electron-photon states using the exact fac- torization,

    A. Abedi, E. Khosravi, and I. Tokatly, “Shedding light on correlated electron-photon states using the exact fac- torization,”Euro. Phys. J. B, vol. 91, p. 194, 2018

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Case studies of the time- dependent potential energy surface for dynamics in cavi- ties,

    P. Martinez, B. Rosenzweig, N. M. Hoffmann, L. La- combe, and N. T. Maitra, “Case studies of the time- dependent potential energy surface for dynamics in cavi- ties,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 154, p. 014102, 2021

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Analysis of the classical trajectory treatment of photon dynamics for polaritonic phenomena,

    B. Rosenzweig, N. M. Hoffmann, L. Lacombe, and N. T. Maitra, “Analysis of the classical trajectory treatment of photon dynamics for polaritonic phenomena,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 156, p. 054101, 2022

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Exact potential energy surface for molecules in cavities,

    L. Lacombe, N. M. Hoffmann, and N. T. Maitra, “Exact potential energy surface for molecules in cavities,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 123, p. 083201, 2019

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Exact factorization of the photon-electron-nuclear wavefunc- tion: Formulation and coupled-trajectory dynamics,

    E. Sangiogo Gil, D. Lauvergnat, and F. Agostini, “Exact factorization of the photon-electron-nuclear wavefunc- tion: Formulation and coupled-trajectory dynamics,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 161, p. 084112, 2024

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Variations on the “exact factorization

    X. Gonze, J. S. Zhou, and L. Reining, “Variations on the “exact factorization” theme,”Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 91, no. 10, p. 224, 2018

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Embedding via the exact factorization approach,

    L. Lacombe and N. T. Maitra, “Embedding via the exact factorization approach,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 124, p. 206401, 2020

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Fock space embedding theory for strongly correlated topological phases,

    E. K. U. G. Ryan Requist, “Fock space embedding theory for strongly correlated topological phases,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 127, p. 116401, 2019

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Elec- tronic vector potential from the exact factorization of a complex wavefunction,

    S. Giarrusso, P. Gori-Giorgi, and F. Agostini, “Elec- tronic vector potential from the exact factorization of a complex wavefunction,”Chem. Phys. Chem., vol. 25, p. 10.1002/cphc.202400127, 2024

    work page doi:10.1002/cphc.202400127 2024

  65. [65]

    Modeling the kohn– sham potential for molecular dissociation with orbital- independent functionals: A proof of principle,

    S. Giarrusso and F. Agostini, “Modeling the kohn– sham potential for molecular dissociation with orbital- independent functionals: A proof of principle,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 162, p. 091103, 2025

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Nonadiabaticity from first principles: Exact-factorization approach for solids,

    G. Cohen, R. Steinitz-Eliyahu, E. Gross, S. Refaely- Abramson, and R. Requist, “Nonadiabaticity from first principles: Exact-factorization approach for solids,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 112, no. 7, p. 075102, 2025

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    The exact one-electron model of molecular structure,

    G. Hunter, “The exact one-electron model of molecular structure,”Int. J. Quantum Chem., vol. 29, p. 197, 1986

    work page 1986

  68. [68]

    Charge-transfer steps in density functional theory from the perspective of the exact electron factorization,

    J. Koc´‘k, E. Kraisler, and A. Schild, “Charge-transfer steps in density functional theory from the perspective of the exact electron factorization,”J. Phys. Chem. Lett., vol. 12, pp. 3204–3209, 2021

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    Dynamics of the molecular geometric phase,

    R. Martinazzo and I. Burghardt, “Dynamics of the molecular geometric phase,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 132, p. 243002, 2024

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Energy- conserving coupled trajectory mixed quantum-classical dynamics,

    E. Villaseco Arribas and N. T. Maitra, “Energy- conserving coupled trajectory mixed quantum-classical dynamics,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 158, no. 16, p. 161105, 2023

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    Partial hydrodynamic representa- tion of quantum molecular dynamics,

    B. Gu and I. Franco, “Partial hydrodynamic representa- tion of quantum molecular dynamics,”J. Chem. Phys., vol. 146, p. 194104, 2017

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Bohmian mechanics in the exact factorization of electron-nuclear wave functions,

    Y. Suzuki and K. Watanabe, “Bohmian mechanics in the exact factorization of electron-nuclear wave functions,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 94, p. 032517, 2016

    work page 2016

  73. [73]

    Nuclear velocity perturbation the- ory for vibrational circular dichroism: An approach based on the exact factorization of the electron-nuclear wavefunction,

    A. Scherrer, F. Agostini, D. Sebastiani, E. K. U. Gross, and R. Vuilleumier, “Nuclear velocity perturbation the- ory for vibrational circular dichroism: An approach based on the exact factorization of the electron-nuclear wavefunction,”J.Chem.Phys., vol.143, no.7, p.074106, 2015

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    On the mass of atoms in molecules: Beyond the born-oppenheimer approximation,

    A. Scherrer, F. Agostini, D. Sebastiani, E. K. U. Gross, and R. Vuilleumier, “On the mass of atoms in molecules: Beyond the born-oppenheimer approximation,”Phys. Rev. X, vol. 7, p. 031035, 2017

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    Thermal equilibrium in coupled trajectory mixed quantum?classical dynamics,

    A. Dines and J. Blumberger, “Thermal equilibrium in coupled trajectory mixed quantum?classical dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 163, p. 044116, 2025

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Cavity molec- ular dynamics simulations of liquid water under vibra- tional ultrastrong coupling,

    T. E. Li, J. E. Subotnik, and A. Nitzan, “Cavity molec- ular dynamics simulations of liquid water under vibra- tional ultrastrong coupling,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 117, pp. 18324–18331, 2020

    work page 2020

  77. [77]

    Power-zienau-woolley representations of nonrelativistic qed for atoms and molecules,

    R. G. Woolley, “Power-zienau-woolley representations of nonrelativistic qed for atoms and molecules,”Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 2, p. 013206, Feb. 2020

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    Power, S

    A. Power, S. Zienau, and H. S. W. Massey Philos. Trans.R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 251, p. 427?454, Sept. 1959

    work page 1959

  79. [79]

    Polarized fock states and the dynamical casimir effect in molecular cavity quantum electrodynamics,

    A. Mandal, S. Montillo Vega, and P. Huo, “Polarized fock states and the dynamical casimir effect in molecular cavity quantum electrodynamics,”J. Phys. Chem. Lett., vol. 11, p. 9215?9223, Sept. 2020

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    Beyond cavity born?oppenheimer: On nonadiabatic coupling and effec- tive ground state hamiltonians in vibro-polaritonic chem- istry,

    E. W. Fischer and P. Saalfrank, “Beyond cavity born?oppenheimer: On nonadiabatic coupling and effec- tive ground state hamiltonians in vibro-polaritonic chem- istry,”J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 19, p. 7215?7229, Oct. 2023

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.