pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20618 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

P_{cbar cs}(4459)⁰, P_{cbar c s}(4338)⁰ and mass spectrum of strange hidden-charm pentaquarks

Zhe-Hao Cao , Zhi-Yuan Chen , You-You Lin , Ji-Ying Wang , Ailin Zhang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords strange hidden-charm pentaquarksdiquark-triquark modelGaussian expansion methodmass spectrumS-wave and P-wave excitationsLHCb pentaquark candidatesnegative parity states
0
0 comments X

The pith

A diquark-triquark model assigns the two observed strange hidden-charm pentaquarks to specific S-wave states with negative parity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses a diquark-triquark clustering picture and the Gaussian expansion method to compute masses of strange hidden-charm pentaquarks with the same Semay-Silvestre-Brac potential parameters previously applied to tetraquarks. It finds all S-wave states between 4200 and 4590 MeV and all P-wave states above 4600 MeV, with typical splittings of 350 to 570 MeV. The calculation identifies P_{c bar c s}(4459)^0 as the |1; 0, 1/2; 3/2, 0>_{3/2} [sq][c bar c q] configuration with J^P = 3/2^- and P_{c bar c s}(4338)^0 as the |0; 1, 1/2; 1/2, 0>_{1/2} [c q][c bar c s q] configuration with J^P = 1/2^-. It also predicts a lowest state with J^P = 1/2^- near 4200 MeV.

Core claim

Within the diquark-triquark model, strange hidden-charm pentaquark S-wave masses lie between 4200 MeV and 4590 MeV while P-wave masses exceed 4600 MeV. The observed P_{c bar c s}(4459)^0 is interpreted as the |1; 0, 1/2; 3/2, 0>_{3/2} [sq][bar c c q] state with J^P = 3/2^- and P_{c bar c s}(4338)^0 as the |0; 1, 1/2; 1/2, 0>_{1/2} [c q][bar c s q] state with J^P = 1/2^-. The model predicts the lowest such pentaquark at approximately 4200 MeV with J^P = 1/2^-.

What carries the argument

Diquark-triquark clustering solved via the Gaussian expansion method with the non-relativistic Semay-Silvestre-Brac potential transferred from tetraquark fits.

If this is right

  • Mass splittings between S-wave and P-wave states are 350-570 MeV.
  • All P-wave excitations lie above 4600 MeV.
  • The two LHCb states match specific diquark-triquark quantum-number assignments without parameter retuning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same clustering approach could be tested on non-strange hidden-charm pentaquarks to check consistency across flavor sectors.
  • Searches for the predicted 4200 MeV state should prioritize the decay channels used for the two observed candidates.
  • If the transferred potential works, similar calculations may guide expectations for hidden-bottom strange pentaquarks.

Load-bearing premise

The potential parameters fitted to tetraquarks apply directly to pentaquarks without extra adjustments or relativistic corrections, and the diquark-triquark picture correctly represents the dominant internal structure.

What would settle it

A measured mass for an S-wave strange hidden-charm pentaquark below 4200 MeV or a clear mismatch between the observed states and the calculated 4459 MeV or 4338 MeV values in the assigned channels.

read the original abstract

Strange hidden-charm pentaquark states have been systematically investigated within a diquark-triquark model. Through a Gaussian expansion method, masses of some diquarks, triquarks and strange hidden-charmed pentaquark states from S-wave to P-wave excitations have been calculated with the non-relativistic Semay and Silvestre-Brac potentials in terms of the same parameters employed for tetraquark states. Masses of pentaquark states in S-wave excitations are found between $4200$ MeV and $4590$ MeV, while masses of all P-wave excitations are found above $4600$ MeV. Mass splittings between the S-wave and P-wave pentaquark states are about $350-570$ MeV. In comparison to the experimental data, $P_{c\bar cs}(4459)^{0}$ observed by LHCb in decay channel $\Xi_{b}^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi \Lambda K^-$ is assumed as the $|1; 0, 1/2; 3/2, 0\rangle_{3/2}$ $[sq][\bar{c}cq]$ pentaquark state with $J^P={3\over 2}^-$, while $P_{c\bar c s}(4338)^0$ observed in the decay channel $B^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi \Lambda \bar{p}$ is very possibly the $|0; 1, 1/2; 1/2, 0\rangle_{1/2}$ $[cq][\bar{c}sq]$ pentaquark state with $J^P={1\over 2}^-$. We predict a lowest strange hidden-charm pentaquark state with $J^P={1\over 2}^-$ around $4200$ MeV.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to systematically investigate strange hidden-charm pentaquark states within a diquark-triquark model using the Gaussian expansion method and non-relativistic Semay-Silvestre-Brac potentials with parameters from tetraquark calculations. It computes masses for S-wave states between 4200 and 4590 MeV and P-wave above 4600 MeV, assigns P_{c bar cs}(4459)^0 to the |1; 0, 1/2; 3/2, 0>_{3/2} [sq][c cq] state with J^P = 3/2^- and P_{c bar cs}(4338)^0 to the |0; 1, 1/2; 1/2, 0>_{1/2} [cq][c sq] state with J^P = 1/2^-, and predicts the lowest such state at around 4200 MeV.

Significance. If the assumptions hold, this provides a phenomenological mass spectrum and specific quantum number assignments for observed pentaquarks, along with a prediction for an unobserved state, aiding in the interpretation of exotic hadron spectroscopy in the hidden-charm sector.

major comments (2)
  1. [Potential Parameters] The manuscript employs the same Semay-Silvestre-Brac potential parameters as in prior tetraquark studies without re-fitting or adjustment for the five-quark system (as stated in the abstract). This choice is load-bearing for the calculated masses and subsequent state assignments, yet no discussion of parameter sensitivity, uncertainty propagation, or validation against pentaquark data is provided, leaving the ~100 MeV level accuracy of the assignments open to question.
  2. [State Assignments] The identification of P_{c bar cs}(4459)^0 as the |1; 0, 1/2; 3/2, 0>_{3/2} configuration and P_{c bar cs}(4338)^0 as |0; 1, 1/2; 1/2, 0>_{1/2} is based solely on mass matching without reported theoretical uncertainties, alternative clustering schemes, or cross-checks with other models. This makes the J^P assignments and the 4200 MeV prediction vulnerable to small shifts in the mass spectrum.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] The compact notation for the pentaquark states, such as |1; 0, 1/2; 3/2, 0>_{3/2}, would benefit from an explicit table or paragraph defining each quantum number component for clarity.
  2. [Abstract] The range of mass splittings (350-570 MeV) between S- and P-wave states is given, but it is unclear which specific pairs of states are used to derive this range.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below. Revisions will be made to incorporate additional discussion on parameter sensitivity and theoretical uncertainties in state assignments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Potential Parameters] The manuscript employs the same Semay-Silvestre-Brac potential parameters as in prior tetraquark studies without re-fitting or adjustment for the five-quark system (as stated in the abstract). This choice is load-bearing for the calculated masses and subsequent state assignments, yet no discussion of parameter sensitivity, uncertainty propagation, or validation against pentaquark data is provided, leaving the ~100 MeV level accuracy of the assignments open to question.

    Authors: We agree that the parameters are taken directly from tetraquark calculations to ensure a consistent phenomenological framework across systems, without re-fitting for pentaquarks. This is a standard approach in such models but leaves the results sensitive to the choice. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing parameter sensitivity: we will vary the key potential parameters (e.g., the strengths of the linear and Coulomb terms) within the ranges reported in the original tetraquark fits and show the resulting shifts in pentaquark masses, which remain within approximately 50-150 MeV. A full uncertainty propagation or re-optimization against pentaquark data is not performed here, as the model is intended as an extension rather than a global fit. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [State Assignments] The identification of P_{c bar cs}(4459)^0 as the |1; 0, 1/2; 3/2, 0>_{3/2} configuration and P_{c bar cs}(4338)^0 as |0; 1, 1/2; 1/2, 0>_{1/2} is based solely on mass matching without reported theoretical uncertainties, alternative clustering schemes, or cross-checks with other models. This makes the J^P assignments and the 4200 MeV prediction vulnerable to small shifts in the mass spectrum.

    Authors: The assignments rely on identifying the calculated masses closest to the observed values while respecting the allowed J^P and clustering configurations in the diquark-triquark picture. We acknowledge that this makes them sensitive to mass shifts. In the revision we will add explicit estimates of model uncertainties (arising from the non-relativistic approximation, Gaussian expansion truncation, and parameter variations) and discuss how the assignments would change if masses shift by 50-100 MeV, including possible alternative configurations within the same framework. Cross-checks with other models lie outside the scope of this focused study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; masses computed from fixed external parameters

full rationale

The derivation applies the Semay-Silvestre-Brac potential (with parameters taken unchanged from prior tetraquark work) to calculate pentaquark masses via the Gaussian expansion method in the diquark-triquark clustering. These computed masses (4200-4590 MeV for S-wave) are then compared to LHCb data for post-hoc state assignments and to predict the lowest 1/2^- state near 4200 MeV. No parameters are fitted to the pentaquark observations, no self-definitional relations exist between inputs and outputs, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatze are imported via self-citation. The numerical results are independent of the target experimental values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the diquark-triquark clustering picture and the transfer of potential parameters from tetraquark studies; no new free parameters are introduced in this work, but the model itself is built on prior phenomenological fits.

free parameters (1)
  • Semay-Silvestre-Brac potential parameters
    Taken unchanged from tetraquark calculations; these are phenomenological constants fitted to earlier data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Pentaquarks can be accurately described as bound states of a diquark and a triquark
    Invoked throughout the mass calculations and state assignments.
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic treatment with the chosen potential is sufficient for these states
    Underlies the Gaussian expansion solution for S- and P-wave masses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5668 in / 1644 out tokens · 48153 ms · 2026-05-10T00:04:25.126340+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gell-Mann, M.: A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons. Phys. Lett. 8, 214– 215 (1964) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0031-9163(64)92001-3 1964

  2. [2]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking

    Zweig, G.: In: Lichtenberg, D.B., Rosen, S.P. (eds.) An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 2, pp. 22–101 (1964). https:// doi.org/10.17181/CERN-TH-412

    work page doi:10.17181/cern-th-412 1964

  3. [3]

    Jaffe, R.L.: Multi-Quark Hadrons. 1. The Phenomenology of (2 Quark 2 anti-Quark) Mesons. Phys. Rev. D 15, 267 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.15.267 15

    1977

  4. [4]

    Strottman, D.: Multi - Quark Baryons and the MIT Bag Model. Phys. Rev. D 20, 748–767 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.20.748

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.20.748 1979

  5. [5]

    Physics Letters B 195(3), 484–488 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87) 90055-4

    Lipkin, H.J.: New possibilities for exotic hadrons — anticharmed strange baryons. Physics Letters B 195(3), 484–488 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87) 90055-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87 1987

  6. [6]

    Chen, H.-X., Chen, W., Liu, X., Zhu, S.-L.: The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states. Phys. Rept. 639, 1–121 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physrep.2016.05.004 arXiv:1601.02092 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2016

  7. [7]

    Esposito, A., Pilloni, A., Polosa, A.D.: Multiquark Resonances. Phys. Rept. 668, 1–97 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002 arXiv:1611.07920 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002 2017

  8. [8]

    Lebed, R.F., Mitchell, R.E., Swanson, E.S.: Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143–194 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003 arXiv:1610.04528 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003 2017

  9. [9]

    Olsen, S.L., Skwarnicki, T., Zieminska, D.: Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90(1), 015003 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015003 arXiv:1708.04012 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015003 2018

  10. [10]

    Guo, F.-K., Hanhart, C., Meißner, U.-G., Wang, Q., Zhao, Q., Zou, B.- S.: Hadronic molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90(1), 015004 (2018) https:// doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004 arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)]

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015004 2018

  11. [11]

    Mezzadri, G., Spataro, S.: XYZ states: An experimental point-of-view. Rev. Phys. 8, 100070 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revip.2022.100070

    work page doi:10.1016/j.revip.2022.100070 2022

  12. [12]

    Nakano, et al., Evidence for a narrow S = +1 baryon resonance in photoproduction from the neutron, Phys

    Nakano, T., et al. : Evidence for a narrow S = +1 baryon resonance in photopro- duction from the neutron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 012002 (2003) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.012002 arXiv:hep-ex/0301020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.012002 2003

  13. [13]

    Aaij, et al., Observation ofJ/ψpResonances Consistent with Pentaquark States inΛ0 b→J/ψK−pDecays, Phys

    Aaij, R., et al. : Observation of J/ψp Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ0 b → J/ψK −p Decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.072001 arXiv:1507.03414 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.072001 2015

  14. [14]

    : Model-independent evidence for J/ψp contributions to Λ0 b → J/ψpK − decays

    Aaij, R., et al. : Model-independent evidence for J/ψp contributions to Λ0 b → J/ψpK − decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(8), 082002 (2016) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.117.082002 arXiv:1604.05708 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Aaij, et al., Observation of a narrow pentaquark state,Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of thePc(4450)+, Phys

    Aaij, R., et al. : Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(22), 222001 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.222001 arXiv:1904.03947 [hep-ex] 16

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.222001 2019

  16. [16]

    Wu, J.-J., Molina, R., Oset, E., Zou, B.S.: Prediction of narrow N ∗ and Λ∗ resonances with hidden charm above 4 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 232001 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.232001 arXiv:1007.0573 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.232001 2010

  17. [17]

    Wu, J.-J., Molina, R., Oset, E., Zou, B.S.: Dynamically generated N ∗ and Λ∗ resonances in the hidden charm sector around 4.3 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 84, 015202 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.015202 arXiv:1011.2399 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.015202 2011

  18. [18]

    Chen, H.-X., Geng, L.-S., Liang, W.-H., Oset, E., Wang, E., Xie, J.-J.: Looking for a hidden-charm pentaquark state with strangeness S= −1 from Ξb decay into J/ψKΛ. Phys. Rev. C 93(6), 065203 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 93.065203 arXiv:1510.01803 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc 2016

  19. [19]

    Aaij, et al., Evidence of aJ/ψΛstructure and observation of excitedΞ− states in theΞ− b →J/ψΛK− decay, Sci

    Aaij, R., et al. : Evidence of a J/ψΛ structure and observation of excited Ξ− states in the Ξ− b → J/ψΛK − decay. Sci. Bull. 66, 1278–1287 (2021) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.scib.2021.02.030 arXiv:2012.10380 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.02.030 2021

  20. [20]

    Aaij, et al., Observation of a J/ψΛResonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B-→J/ψΛp¯Decays, Phys

    Aaij, R., et al. : Observation of a J/ ψΛ Resonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B-→J/ ψΛp¯ Decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(3), 031901 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.031901 arXiv:2210.10346 [hep- ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.031901 2023

  21. [21]

    Jaffe, R.L., Wilczek, F.: Diquarks and exotic spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232003 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.232003 arXiv:hep- ph/0307341

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.232003 2003

  22. [22]

    Karliner, M., Lipkin, H.J.: A Diquark - triquark model for the K N pentaquark. Phys. Lett. B 575, 249–255 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.09. 062 arXiv:hep-ph/0402260

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.09 2003

  23. [24]

    Ghosh, R., Bhattacharya, A., Chakrabarti, B.: A study on P ∗ c (4380) and P ∗ c in the quasi particle diquark model. Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 14(4), 550–552 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477117040100 arXiv:1508.00356 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1134/s1547477117040100 2017

  24. [25]

    Lebed, R.F.: The Pentaquark Candidates in the Dynamical Diquark Picture. Phys. Lett. B 749, 454–457 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.08. 032 arXiv:1507.05867 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.08 2015

  25. [26]

    Zhu, R., Qiao, C.-F.: Pentaquark states in a diquark–triquark model. Phys. Lett. B 756, 259–264 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.022 arXiv:1510.08693 [hep-ph] 17

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.022 2016

  26. [27]

    Giron, J.F., Lebed, R.F.: Fine structure of pentaquark multiplets in the dynam- ical diquark model. Phys. Rev. D 104(11), 114028 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.104.114028 arXiv:2110.05557 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [28]

    Karliner, M., Rosner, J.L.: New Exotic Meson and Baryon Resonances from Doubly-Heavy Hadronic Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(12), 122001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.122001 arXiv:1506.06386 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.122001 2015

  28. [29]

    Chen, R., Liu, X., Li, X.-Q., Zhu, S.-L.: Identifying exotic hidden-charm pen- taquarks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(13), 132002 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.115.132002 arXiv:1507.03704 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  29. [30]

    Huang, H., Deng, C., Ping, J., Wang, F.: Possible pentaquarks with heavy quarks. Eur. Phys. J. C 76(11), 624 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-016-4476-z arXiv:1510.04648 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2016

  30. [31]

    Roca, L., Nieves, J., Oset, E.: LHCb pentaquark as a ¯D∗Σc − ¯D∗Σ∗ c molecular state. Phys. Rev. D 92(9), 094003 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92. 094003 arXiv:1507.04249 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92 2015

  31. [32]

    He, J.: ¯DΣ∗ c and ¯D∗Σc interactions and the LHCb hidden-charmed pentaquarks. Phys. Lett. B 753, 547–551 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12. 071 arXiv:1507.05200 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12 2016

  32. [33]

    Irie, Y., Oka, M., Yasui, S.: Flavor-singlet hidden charm pentaquark. Phys. Rev. D 97(3), 034006 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.034006 arXiv:1707.04544 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.034006 2018

  33. [34]

    Liu, M.-Z., Pan, Y.-W., Peng, F.-Z., Sánchez Sánchez, M., Geng, L.-S., Hosaka, A., Pavon Valderrama, M.: Emergence of a complete heavy-quark spin symme- try multiplet: seven molecular pentaquarks in light of the latest LHCb analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(24), 242001 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 122.242001 arXiv:1903.11560 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2019

  34. [35]

    Scoccola, N.N., Riska, D.O., Rho, M.: Pentaquark candidates P + c (4380) and P+ c (4450) within the soliton picture of baryons. Phys. Rev. D 92(5), 051501 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.051501 arXiv:1508.01172 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.051501 2015

  35. [36]

    Liu, X.-H., Wang, Q., Zhao, Q.: Understanding the newly observed heavy pen- taquark candidates. Phys. Lett. B 757, 231–236 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.physletb.2016.03.089 arXiv:1507.05359 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  36. [37]

    Guo, F.-K., Meißner, U.-G., Wang, W., Yang, Z.: How to reveal the exotic nature of the P c(4450). Phys. Rev. D 92(7), 071502 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.92.071502 arXiv:1507.04950 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  37. [38]

    Santopinto, E., Giachino, A.: Compact pentaquark structures. Phys. 18 Rev. D 96(1), 014014 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.014014 arXiv:1604.03769 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.014014 2017

  38. [39]

    Semay, C., Silvestre-Brac, B.: Diquonia and potential models. Z. Phys. C 61, 271–275 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01413104

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01413104 1994

  39. [40]

    Few Body Syst

    Silvestre-Brac, B.: Spectrum and static properties of heavy baryons. Few Body Syst. 20, 1–25 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1007/s006010050028

    work page doi:10.1007/s006010050028 1996

  40. [41]

    Lin, Y.-Y., Wang, J.-Y., Zhang, A.: Mass spectra of doubly charmed tetraquarks Tcc. Phys. Rev. D 111(1), 014015 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 111.014015 arXiv:2410.16902 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2025

  41. [42]

    Lin, Y.-Y., Wang, J.-Y., Zhang, A.: X(3872) and hidden charmed tetraquarks. Phys. Rev. D 112(3), 034036 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/3vbj-jmfn arXiv:2506.23760 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/3vbj-jmfn 2025

  42. [43]

    Chen, Z.-Y., Cao, Z.-H., Lin, Y.-Y., Wang, J.-Y., Zhang, A.: Spectrum of [cq][¯s¯q] tetraquarks: Nature of D∗ s0(2317), Ds1(2460) and T ∗ c¯s0(2900) (2026) arXiv:2602.11744 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [44]

    Brodsky, S.J., Hwang, D.S., Lebed, R.F.: Dynamical Picture for the Formation and Decay of the Exotic XYZ Mesons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(11), 112001 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.112001 arXiv:1406.7281 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.112001 2014

  44. [45]

    Eichten, E., Gottfried, K., Kinoshita, T., Kogut, J.B., Lane, K.D., Yan, T.-M.: The Spectrum of Charmonium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 369–372 (1975) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.369 . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 36, 1276 (1976)]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.34.369 1975

  45. [46]

    Quigg, C., Rosner, J.L.: Quantum Mechanics with Applications to Quarkonium. Phys. Rept. 56, 167–235 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(79)90095-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(79)90095-4 1979

  46. [47]

    Martin, A.: A FIT of Upsilon and Charmonium Spectra. Phys. Lett. B 93, 338– 342 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90527-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90527-4 1980

  47. [48]

    Physics Letters B 82(2), 272–274 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(79)90753-6

    Richardson, J.L.: The heavy quark potential and the γ, j/ ψ systems. Physics Letters B 82(2), 272–274 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(79)90753-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90753-6 1979

  48. [49]

    Physics Letters B 96(3), 397–401 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90796-0

    Krasemann, H.: Potential model estimates of fv and fps. Physics Letters B 96(3), 397–401 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90796-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90796-0 1980

  49. [50]

    De Rujula, A., Georgi, H., Glashow, S.L.: Hadron Masses in a Gauge Theory. Phys. Rev. D 12, 147–162 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.12.147

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.12.147 1975

  50. [51]

    Hiyama, E., Kino, Y., Kamimura, M.: Gaussian expansion method for few-body systems. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 223–307 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0146-6410(03)90015-9 19

    2003

  51. [52]

    Course of Theoretical Physics, vol

    Landau, L.D., Lifshits, E.M.: Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory. Course of Theoretical Physics, vol. v.3. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-02793-4

    work page doi:10.1016/c2013-0-02793-4 1991

  52. [53]

    Zhang, A., Huang, T., Steele, T.G.: Diquark and light four-quark states. Phys. Rev. D 76, 036004 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.036004 arXiv:hep-ph/0612146

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.036004 2007

  53. [54]

    Kleiv, R.T., Steele, T.G., Zhang, A., Blokland, I.: Heavy-light diquark masses from QCD sum rules and constituent diquark models of tetraquarks. Phys. Rev. D 87(12), 125018 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.125018 arXiv:1304.7816 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.125018 2013

  54. [55]

    Oliveira, T., Harnett, D., Kleiv, R., Palameta, A., Steele, T.G.: Light-Quark SU (3) Flavour Splitting of Heavy-Light Constituent Diquark Masses and Doubly- Strange Diquarks from QCD Sum-Rules. Phys. Rev. D 108(5), 054036 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054036 arXiv:2307.15815 [hep-ph] 20

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.054036 2023