pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20672 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph · quant-ph

Attosecond Nonlinear Quantum Electrodynamics in Laser-Driven Plasmas via Two-Photon Synchrotron Emission

Vedin Dewan , Aleksei M. Zheltikov , Julia M. Mikhailova This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph quant-ph
keywords laser-plasma interactionsnonlinear quantum electrodynamicstwo-photon emissionattosecond pulsesrelativistic electronssynchrotron radiationcorrelated photon pairs
0
0 comments X

The pith

Relativistic electrons in laser-driven plasmas produce attosecond bursts of two-photon emission as a lowest-order nonlinear QED process.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that an intense ultrashort laser pulse interacting with a plasma generates and accelerates dense electron bunches to relativistic energies, leading to photon-pair emission on nanometer spatial and attosecond temporal scales. This two-photon synchrotron emission arises without any external relativistic beam and is presented as the lowest-order nonlinear QED effect in this setting. The emission rate is given as alpha squared times gamma times the local curvature frequency, while strongly correlated pairs appear at a reduced rate involving the laser field strength relative to the Schwinger limit. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach supplies a concrete way to access and isolate quantum electrodynamic phenomena inside complex, self-consistent laser-plasma dynamics.

Core claim

As a lowest-order nonlinear QED process, relativistic electrons in laser-driven plasmas give rise to attosecond bursts of two-photon emission, providing an ultrabroadband source of correlated photon pairs. The rate is expressed as alpha squared gamma omega turn, and the rate for pairs with strongest correlations is alpha squared gamma squared omega turn times E perpendicular over E S.

What carries the argument

Two-photon synchrotron emission from relativistic electron bunches, with its rate tied directly to the local relativistic curvature frequency omega turn of the plasma-accelerated electrons.

Load-bearing premise

The two-photon emission can be cleanly separated from classical radiation, and the electron bunches together with their local curvature frequency are described accurately by the plasma model without requiring full kinetic simulations.

What would settle it

Observation or non-observation of attosecond-scale two-photon emission bursts whose rate scales as alpha squared gamma omega turn in a controlled laser-plasma experiment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20672 by Aleksei M. Zheltikov, Julia M. Mikhailova, Vedin Dewan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Normal-incidence, weakly relativistic kinematics of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Oblique-incidence, strongly relativistic kinematics of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Two-photon emission that accompanies electron tran [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fig.2. This leads to count rates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Scaling of electron energy, attosecond emission, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ultrafast strong-field laser--plasma physics is shown to offer a promising framework for relativistic nonlinear quantum electrodynamics (QED). As one of its key advantages, this approach to relativistic nonlinear QED does not require an external beam of relativistic particles. Instead, high-energy electrons are produced in this setting as a part of ultrafast strong-field laser--plasma interactions. An intense ultrashort laser pulse generates and accelerates dense electron bunches to relativistic energies, giving rise to photon-pair emission confined to the nanometer scale in space and the attosecond scale in time. As a lowest-order nonlinear QED process, relativistic electrons in laser-driven plasmas are shown to give rise to attosecond bursts of two-photon emission, providing an ultrabroadband source of correlated photon pairs. As a physically insightful estimate, the rate of this two-photon emission is expressed via a product $ \alpha^2 \gamma \omega_{turn}$, where $\alpha$ is the fine-structure constant, $\gamma$ is the Lorentz factor, and $ \omega_{turn}$ is the local relativistic curvature frequency. Photon pairs with strongest correlations, providing a resource for photon entanglement, are emitted at a much lower rate, estimated as $ \alpha^2 \gamma^2 \omega_{turn} E_{\perp} /E_S$, where $E_{\perp}$ is the laser electromagnetic field, determining the transverse Lorentz force, and $E_S$ is the Schwinger critical field. Our study offers a clear guidance on how quantum aspects of laser-driven relativistic plasma electrodynamics can be isolated from their classical counterparts, enabling a physically justifiable approach to the analysis of nonlinear QED phenomena in complex laser--plasma interactions driven by ultrashort high-intensity laser pulses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that ultrafast strong-field laser-plasma interactions generate attosecond bursts of two-photon synchrotron emission from self-produced relativistic electrons as a lowest-order nonlinear QED process, without requiring external relativistic beams. It supplies order-of-magnitude rate estimates α² γ ω_turn for the emission and α² γ² ω_turn E_⊥ / E_S for strongly correlated (entangled) pairs, claiming this yields an ultrabroadband source of photon pairs while providing guidance to isolate quantum effects from classical radiation in complex plasma dynamics.

Significance. If the claimed separation of the two-photon QED channel from classical synchrotron radiation holds under rigorous scrutiny, the work would offer a novel self-consistent framework for nonlinear QED in laser-driven plasmas, potentially enabling attosecond-scale correlated photon sources. The absence of machine-checked derivations, reproducible code, or falsifiable predictions against full simulations limits the immediate impact, but the conceptual bridge between plasma electrodynamics and QED remains of interest if substantiated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that relativistic electrons 'are shown to give rise to' attosecond two-photon emission at rate α² γ ω_turn is presented without derivation steps, error estimates, or explicit comparison to the classical radiation limit, rendering it impossible to verify whether the expression constitutes a valid, isolated lowest-order nonlinear QED correction.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The rate expressions depend on γ and ω_turn as inputs from the plasma interaction; without an independent computation or demonstration that these are not implicitly adjusted to the target result, the estimate risks circularity and cannot be cleanly extracted as asserted.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that quantum aspects can be isolated from classical counterparts via order-of-magnitude estimates lacks a quantitative criterion or validation (e.g., against QED-PIC or exact two-photon matrix elements in the same field configuration), leaving the separation from dominant classical synchrotron radiation unconfirmed at the quoted level.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The symbols E_⊥ and E_S are introduced without explicit definition or reference to prior equations, which may hinder readability for a broad plasma-physics audience.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where appropriate. Our goal is to strengthen the presentation of the estimates while maintaining the conceptual framework proposed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that relativistic electrons 'are shown to give rise to' attosecond two-photon emission at rate α² γ ω_turn is presented without derivation steps, error estimates, or explicit comparison to the classical radiation limit, rendering it impossible to verify whether the expression constitutes a valid, isolated lowest-order nonlinear QED correction.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, due to its brevity, does not include detailed derivation steps or error estimates. The rate expression α² γ ω_turn is derived in the main text from the standard QED two-photon emission cross-section for synchrotron radiation in the relativistic regime, using the local curvature frequency ω_turn as the characteristic frequency. Error estimates are of order unity given the order-of-magnitude approach. Regarding comparison to the classical limit, the two-photon process is a higher-order correction suppressed by an additional factor of α, and we have added a clarifying paragraph in the revised manuscript's introduction that explicitly contrasts the quantum pair emission rate with the classical single-photon synchrotron power, showing the quantum channel is isolated by its attosecond temporal structure and correlation properties. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The rate expressions depend on γ and ω_turn as inputs from the plasma interaction; without an independent computation or demonstration that these are not implicitly adjusted to the target result, the estimate risks circularity and cannot be cleanly extracted as asserted.

    Authors: The parameters γ and ω_turn are obtained from the standard analysis of laser-plasma interactions, specifically from the laser intensity determining the ponderomotive energy and thus γ, and from the plasma density and laser wavelength setting the curvature radius for ω_turn = c / ρ. These are independent of the QED rate calculation and are typical values reported in the literature for such interactions (e.g., γ ~ 10-100 for intensities 10^18-10^20 W/cm²). We have revised the manuscript to include a brief section specifying how these inputs are chosen from plasma parameters without reference to the QED result, thereby avoiding any appearance of circularity. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that quantum aspects can be isolated from classical counterparts via order-of-magnitude estimates lacks a quantitative criterion or validation (e.g., against QED-PIC or exact two-photon matrix elements in the same field configuration), leaving the separation from dominant classical synchrotron radiation unconfirmed at the quoted level.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a more rigorous quantitative validation against full QED-PIC simulations would be ideal but is beyond the scope of this conceptual paper, which focuses on providing order-of-magnitude guidance. The quantitative criterion is the smallness of the rates: the two-photon rate is smaller than classical by α, and the entangled pairs by α (E_perp/E_S), allowing isolation when classical radiation is filtered temporally or spectrally. We have expanded the discussion in the conclusions to include a proposed experimental signature, such as coincidence detection of photon pairs, to falsify or confirm the estimate. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: estimates use independent plasma outputs without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper presents the two-photon rate as a physically insightful estimate α² γ ω_turn drawn from standard QED synchrotron formulas applied to relativistic electrons whose γ and local curvature frequency ω_turn are taken as outputs of the laser-plasma interaction. No derivation chain is shown that defines or fits these quantities from the target emission rate itself, nor does the text invoke self-citations for uniqueness theorems, smuggle ansatzes, or rename known results as new predictions. The separation of QED pair emission from classical radiation is framed as order-of-magnitude guidance rather than a fitted or self-referential step. The central claim therefore retains independent content from the plasma model and does not collapse to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies only high-level estimates; no explicit free parameters are introduced, but the framework rests on standard plasma-acceleration assumptions and the separation of quantum from classical radiation.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption High-energy electron bunches are generated and accelerated to relativistic energies inside the laser-plasma interaction
    Stated directly in the abstract as the source of the emitting electrons.
  • domain assumption The two-photon emission can be treated as the lowest-order nonlinear QED process separable from classical synchrotron radiation
    Central to the claim that quantum aspects can be isolated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5631 in / 1407 out tokens · 23342 ms · 2026-05-09T23:04:28.497487+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. A. Mourou, T. Tajima, and S. V. Bulanov, Optics in the relativistic regime, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 309 (2006)

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Di Piazza, C

    A. Di Piazza, C. M¨ uller, K. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. 8 Keitel, Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics84, 1177 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Mourou, Nobel lecture: Extreme light physics and ap- plication, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 030501 (2019)

    G. Mourou, Nobel lecture: Extreme light physics and ap- plication, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 030501 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Barty, The nexawatt: a strategy for exawatt peak power lasers based on nif and nif-like beam lines, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol

    C. Barty, The nexawatt: a strategy for exawatt peak power lasers based on nif and nif-like beam lines, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 717 (IOP Publishing, 2016) p. 012086

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Poder, M

    K. Poder, M. Tamburini, G. Sarri, A. Di Piazza, S. Kuschel, C. Baird, K. Behm, S. Bohlen, J. Cole, D. Corvan, et al., Experimental signatures of the quan- tum nature of radiation reaction in the field of an ultrain- tense laser, Physical Review X8, 031004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Fedeli, A

    L. Fedeli, A. Sainte-Marie, N. Za¨ ım, M. Th´ evenet, J.- L. Vay, A. Myers, F. Qu´ er´ e, and H. Vincenti, Prob- ing strong-field qed with doppler-boosted petawatt-class lasers, Physical review letters127, 114801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    C. N. Danson, C. Haefner, J. Bromage, T. Butcher, J.- C. F. Chanteloup, E. A. Chowdhury, A. Galvanauskas, L. A. Gizzi, J. Hein, D. I. Hillier, et al., Petawatt and exawatt class lasers worldwide, High Power Laser Science and Engineering7, e54 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Willingale, A

    L. Willingale, A. Maksimchuk, J. Nees, F. Bayer, M. Burger, P. T. Campbell, B. Hou, I. Jovanovic, G. Kalinchenko, C. C. Kuranz, et al., Status of the zeus laser user facility, in CLEO: Science and Innovations (Optica Publishing Group, 2023) pp. SM1D–7

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Quantum Electrodynamics: Volume 4, Vol. 4 (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1982)

    work page 1982

  10. [10]

    Gonoskov, T

    A. Gonoskov, T. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. Bu- lanov, Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields, Reviews of Modern Physics94, 045001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Elkina, A

    N. Elkina, A. Fedotov, I. Y. Kostyukov, M. Legkov, N. Narozhny, E. Nerush, and H. Ruhl, Qed cascades in- duced by circularly polarized laser fields, Physical Re- view Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams14, 054401 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Nerush, I

    E. Nerush, I. Y. Kostyukov, A. Fedotov, N. Narozhny, N. Elkina, and H. Ruhl, Laser field absorption in self- generated electron-positron pair plasma, Physical review letters106, 035001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    C. Bula, K. McDonald, E. Prebys, C. Bamber, S. Boege, T. Kotseroglou, A. Melissinos, D. Meyerhofer, W. Ragg, D. Burke, et al., Observation of nonlinear effects in comp- ton scattering, Physical Review Letters76, 3116 (1996)

    work page 1996

  14. [14]

    Burke, R

    D. Burke, R. Field, G. Horton-Smith, J. Spencer, D. Walz, S. Berridge, W. Bugg, K. Shmakov, A. Wei- demann, C. Bula, et al., Positron production in multi- photon light-by-light scattering, Physical Review Letters 79, 1626 (1997)

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    J.-X. Li, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, B. J. Galow, and C. H. Kei- tel, Attosecond gamma-ray pulses via nonlinear compton scattering in the radiation-dominated regime, Physical review letters115, 204801 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    M. R. Edwards, N. J. Fisch, and J. M. Mikhailova, Strongly enhanced stimulated Brillouin backscattering in an electron-positron plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 015004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    W. Yan, C. Fruhling, G. Golovin, D. Haden, J. Luo, P. Zhang, B. Zhao, J. Zhang, C. Liu, M. Chen, et al., High-order multiphoton thomson scattering, Nature Pho- tonics11, 514 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Di Piazza, M

    A. Di Piazza, M. Tamburini, S. Meuren, and C. Kei- tel, Implementing nonlinear compton scattering beyond the local-constant-field approximation, Physical Review A98, 012134 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Mackenroth and A

    F. Mackenroth and A. Di Piazza, Nonlinear double comp- ton scattering in the ultrarelativistic quantum regime, Physical review letters110, 070402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    King and H

    B. King and H. Ruhl, Trident pair production in a con- stant crossed field, Phys. Rev. D88, 013005 (2013)

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Sch¨ utzhold, G

    R. Sch¨ utzhold, G. Schaller, and D. Habs, Signatures of the unruh effect from electrons accelerated by ultrastrong laser fields, Physical review letters97, 121302 (2006)

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    Sch¨ utzhold, G

    R. Sch¨ utzhold, G. Schaller, and D. Habs, Tabletop cre- ation of entangled multi-kev photon pairs and the unruh effect, Physical review letters100, 091301 (2008)

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    L¨ otstedt and U

    E. L¨ otstedt and U. D. Jentschura, Correlated two-photon emission by transitions of dirac-volkov states in in- tense laser fields: Qed predictions, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics80, 053419 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    L¨ otstedt and U

    E. L¨ otstedt and U. D. Jentschura, Nonperturbative treat- ment of double compton backscattering in intense laser fields, Physical review letters103, 110404 (2009)

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    Zhang, Z

    L. Zhang, Z. Li, D. Liu, C. Wu, H. Xu, and Z. Li, Entan- gled x-ray photon pair generation by free-electron lasers, Physical Review Letters131, 073601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Yu. M. Mikhailova, V. T. Platonenko, and S. Rykovanov, Generation of an attosecond x-ray pulse in a thin film irradiated by an ultrashort ultrarelativistic laser pulse, JETP Lett.81, 571 (2005)

    work page 2005

  27. [27]

    J. M. Mikhailova, M. V. Fedorov, N. Karpowicz, P. Gib- bon, V. T. Platonenko, A. M. Zheltikov, and F. Krausz, Isolated attosecond pulses from laser-driven synchrotron radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 245005 (2012)

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    M. R. Edwards and J. M. Mikhailova, Waveform- controlled relativistic high-order-harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 125001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    M. R. Edwards, N. M. Fasano, and J. M. Mikhailova, Electron-nanobunch-width-dominated spectral power law for relativistic harmonic generation from ultrathin foils, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 185004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    M. R. Edwards, V. T. Platonenko, and J. M. Mikhailova, Enhanced attosecond bursts of relativistic high-order harmonics driven by two-color fields, Opt. Lett.39, 6823 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    M. R. Edwards and J. M. Mikhailova, Multipass relativis- tic high-order harmonic generation for intense attosecond pulses, Phys. Rev. A93, 023836 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    M. R. Edwards and J. M. Mikhailova, The x-ray emission effectiveness of plasma mirrors: Reexamining power-law scaling for relativistic high-order harmonic generation, Sci. Rep.10, 5154 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    an der Br¨ ugge and A

    D. an der Br¨ ugge and A. Pukhov, Enhanced relativistic harmonics by electron nanobunching, Phys. Plasmas17, 033110 (2010)

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    Dromey, S

    B. Dromey, S. Rykovanov, M. Yeung, R. H¨ orlein, D. Jung, D. C. Gautier, T. Dzelzainis, D. Kiefer, S. Palaniyppan, R. Shah, J. Schreiber, H. Ruhl, J. C. Fer- nandez, C. L. S. Lewis, M. Zepf, and B. M. Hegelich, Co- herent synchrotron emission from electron nanobunches formed in relativistic laser-plasma interactions, Nat. Phys.8, 804 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Cherednychek and A

    M. Cherednychek and A. Pukhov, Analytical description 9 of attosecond pulse generation on a plasma surface irra- diated by high-intense laser pulses, Quantum Electronics 46, 353 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Cousens, B

    S. Cousens, B. Reville, B. Dromey, and M. Zepf, Tempo- ral structure of attosecond pulses from laser-driven coher- ent synchrotron emission, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 083901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    N. M. Fasano, M. R. Edwards, and J. M. Mikhailova, Electron bunch dynamics and emission in particle-in-cell simulations of relativistic laser–solid interactions: On density artifacts, collisions, and numerical dispersion, Physics of Plasmas30(2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Cherednychek and A

    M. Cherednychek and A. Pukhov, Analytical approach to high harmonics spectrum in the nanobunching regime, Phys. Plasmas23, 103301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    water-window

    P. Gibbon, Harmonic generation by femtosecond laser- solid interaction: A coherent “water-window” light source?, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 50 (1996)

    work page 1996

  40. [40]

    Lichters, J

    R. Lichters, J. Meyer-ter Vehn, and A. Pukhov, Short- pulse laser harmonics from oscillating plasma surfaces driven at relativistic intensity, Phys. Plasmas3, 3425 (1996)

    work page 1996

  41. [41]

    Tarasevitch, K

    A. Tarasevitch, K. Lobov, C. W¨ unsche, and D. von der Linde, Transition to the relativistic regime in high order harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 103902 (2007)

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    Dromey, D

    B. Dromey, D. Adams, R. H¨ orlein, Y. Nomura, S. Ryko- vanov, D. Carroll, P. Foster, S. Kar, K. Markey, P. McKenna, et al., Diffraction-limited performance and focusing of high harmonics from relativistic plasmas, Nat. Phys.5, 146 (2009)

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Heissler, R

    P. Heissler, R. H¨ orlein, J. M. Mikhailova, L. Waldecker, P. Tzallas, A. Buck, K. Schmid, C. M. S. Sears, F. Krausz, L. Veisz, M. Zepf, and G. D. Tsakiris, Few- cycle driven relativistically oscillating plasma mirrors: a source of intense isolated attosecond pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 235003 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    Heissler, A

    P. Heissler, A. Barna, J. M. Mikhailova, G. Ma, K. Khrennikov, S. Karsch, L. Veisz, I. F¨ oldes, and G. D. Tsakiris, Multi-µJ harmonic emission energy from laser- driven plasma, Appl. Phys. B118, 195 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Heißler, R

    P. Heißler, R. H¨ orlein, M. Stafe, J. M. Mikhailova, Y. Nomura, D. Herrmann, R. Tautz, S. G. Rykovanov, I. F¨ oldes, K. Varj´ u,et al., Toward single attosecond pulses using harmonic emission from solid-density plas- mas, Appl. Phys. B101, 511 (2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    Teubner and P

    U. Teubner and P. Gibbon, High-order harmonics from laser-irradiated plasma surfaces, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 445 (2009)

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Cavagna, M

    A. Cavagna, M. Eder, E. Chowdhury, A. Kalouguine, J. Kaur, G. Mourou, S. Haessler, and R. Lopez-Martens, Continuous relativistic high-harmonic generation from a khz liquid-sheet plasma mirror, Optics Letters50, 165 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Dollar, P

    F. Dollar, P. Cummings, V. Chvykov, L. Willingale, M. Vargas, V. Yanovsky, C. Zulick, A. Maksimchuk, A. G. R. Thomas, and K. Krushelnick, Scaling high-order harmonic generation from laser-solid interactions to ul- trahigh intensity, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 175002 (2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Vincenti, S

    H. Vincenti, S. Monchoc´ e, S. Kahaly, G. Bonnaud, P. Martin, and F. Qu´ er´ e, Optical properties of relativistic plasma mirrors, Nat. Commun.5(2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    Vincenti, Achieving extreme light intensities using op- tically curved relativistic plasma mirrors, Physical review letters123, 105001 (2019)

    H. Vincenti, Achieving extreme light intensities using op- tically curved relativistic plasma mirrors, Physical review letters123, 105001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    T. D. Arber, K. Bennett, C. S. Brady, A. Lawrence- Douglas, M. G. Ramsay, N. J. Sircombe, P. Gillies, R. G. Evans, H. Schmitz, A. R. Bell, and C. P. Ridgers, Con- temporary particle-in-cell approach to laser-plasma mod- elling, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion57, 113001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    A. A. Sokolov and I. M. Ternov, Relativistic Electron (Moscow Izdatel ”Nauka”, 1974)

    work page 1974

  53. [53]

    Ritus, Vacuum polarization correction to elastic elec- tron and muon scattering in an intense field and pair electro-and muoproduction, Nuclear Physics B44, 236 (1972)

    V. Ritus, Vacuum polarization correction to elastic elec- tron and muon scattering in an intense field and pair electro-and muoproduction, Nuclear Physics B44, 236 (1972)

    work page 1972

  54. [54]

    Morozov and V

    D. Morozov and V. Ritus, Elastic electron scattering in an intense field and two-photon emission, Nuclear Physics B86, 309 (1975)

    work page 1975

  55. [55]

    A. A. Sokolov, A. M. Voloshchenko, V. C. Zhukovskii, and Y. G. Pavlenko, Two-photon synchrotron emission, Soviet Physics Journal19, 1139 (1976)

    work page 1976

  56. [56]

    Y. Wang, S. Wang, A. Rockwood, B. M. Luther, R. Hollinger, A. Curtis, C. Calvi, C. S. Menoni, and J. J. Rocca, 0.85 PW laser operation at 33 Hz and high- contrast ultrahigh-intensityλ=400 nm second-harmonic beamline, Optics Letters42, 3828 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Gordienko and A

    S. Gordienko and A. Pukhov, Scalings for ultrarelativis- tic laser plasma and quasimonoenergetic electrons, Phys. Plasmas12, 043109 (2005)

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    Maksimchuk, J

    A. Maksimchuk, J. Nees, B. Hou, R. Anthony, J. Bae, F. Bayer, M. Burger, P. Campbell, J. Cardarelli, V. Con- treras, et al., The ZEUS multi-petawatt laser system, Physics of Plasmas32(2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Gales, K

    S. Gales, K. A. Tanaka, D. L. Balabanski, F. Negoita, D. Stutman, O. Tesileanu, C. A. Ur, D. Ursescu, I. An- drei, S. Ataman, M. O. Cernaianu, L. D’Alessi, I. Dancus, B. Diaconescu, N. Djourelov, D. Filipescu, P. Ghenuche, D. G. Ghita, C. Matei, K. Seto, M. Zeng, and N. V. Zam- fir, The extreme light infrastructure—nuclear physics (ELI-NP) facility: new h...

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    A. S. Pirozhkov, Y. Fukuda, M. Nishiuchi, H. Kiriyama, A. Sagisaka, K. Ogura, M. Mori, M. Kishimoto, H. Sakaki, N. P. Dover, K. Kondo, N. Nakanii, K. Huang, M. Kanasaki, K. Kondo, and M. Kando, Approaching the diffraction-limited, bandwidth-limited petawatt, Optics Express25, 20486 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    Z. Guo, L. Yu, J. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Gan, W. Li, Y. Leng, X. Liang, and R. Li, Improvement of the focus- ing ability by double deformable mirrors for 10 PW-level Ti:Sapphire chirped pulse amplification laser system, Op- tics Express26, 26776 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Bromage, S.-W

    J. Bromage, S.-W. Bahk, I. A. Begishev, C. Dorrer, M. J. Guardalben, B. N. Hoffman, J. B. Oliver, R. G. Roides, E. M. Schiesser, M. J. Shoup III, M. Spilatro, B. Webb, D. Weiner, and J. D. Zuegel, Technology development for ultraintense all-OPCPA systems, High Power Laser Science and Engineering7(2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    J. W. Yoon, Y. G. Kim, I. W. Choi, J. H. Sung, H. W. Lee, S. K. Lee, and C. H. Nam, Realization of laser in- tensity over 1023 W/cm2, Optica8, 630 (2021)

    work page 2021