pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21186 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.app-ph· physics.ins-det

Nanoscale Fluorescence Thermometry: Probes, Recent Advances and Emerging Directions

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-phphysics.ins-det
keywords nanoscale thermometryfluorescence nanothermometryoptical temperature sensingfluorescent probesnanoscale temperature mappingmaterial platformsthermal characterization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fluorescence nanothermometry infers nanoscale temperatures from changes in probe fluorescence properties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how fluorescence nanothermometry works by linking temperature to observable shifts in nanoscale probes' light emission, such as changes in color, brightness, or lifetime. It surveys the material platforms that serve as these probes and evaluates recent technical improvements alongside persistent limitations in sensitivity and integration. A sympathetic reader would care because conventional contact-based thermometers cannot operate reliably once devices or biological structures shrink below the micrometer scale, leaving a gap in measurement capability for electronics, fluids, and living cells.

Core claim

Fluorescence nanothermometry enables remote, spatially resolved temperature measurements with sub-micrometer-to-nanometer precision by inferring temperature from variations in fluorescence observables including spectral position, intensity, linewidth, and excited-state dynamics, across applications in nanoelectronics, microfluidics, and biological systems; the review supplies a critical synthesis of mechanisms, material platforms, advances, challenges, and emerging strategies to support development of robust real-time thermometers.

What carries the argument

Temperature-dependent changes in fluorescence observables (spectral position, intensity, linewidth, excited-state dynamics) of nanoscale probes that convert local heat into remotely readable optical signals.

If this is right

  • Temperature can be measured non-invasively inside operating nanoelectronic circuits without disturbing their function.
  • Biological processes can be monitored in real time at subcellular scales where contact probes are impractical.
  • Material choices must balance sensitivity, response speed, and biocompatibility for each target environment.
  • System designs that combine multiple fluorescence observables can improve accuracy beyond single-parameter methods.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration of these optical thermometers with existing nanoscale imaging systems could enable simultaneous temperature and structural mapping.
  • The same probe mechanisms might extend to related sensing tasks such as local pH or chemical concentration if temperature cross-talk can be calibrated out.
  • Scalable fabrication of the reviewed probe platforms would be required before widespread deployment in commercial microfluidic devices.

Load-bearing premise

The review's overview comprehensively and without major omissions covers all key mechanisms, material platforms, advances, challenges, and emerging directions in the field.

What would settle it

The appearance of a major unmentioned material platform or mechanism that experimental literature shows is already widely adopted and outperforms the reviewed options would demonstrate incompleteness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21186 by Chaohao Chen, Jiayan Liao, Md Shakhawath Hossain, Nhat Minh Nguyen, Qian Peter Su, Quynh Le-Van, Thi Ngoc Anh Mai, Toan Dinh, Toan Trong Tran, Trung Vuong Doan, Vu Khac Dat, Xiaoxue Xu, Yongliang Chen.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: All optical diamond thermometry (a) Atomic structure of group IV color centers exhibiting D3d symmetry in a split-vacancy configuration, where the group IV impurity atom (M, orange) is positioned between two adjacent carbon vacancies (V, white). [Reproduced from [108] under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature], (b) Representative photoluminescence (PL) spectra of SiV⁻, GeV⁻,… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: QDs-based fluorescence thermometry (a) Representative QD core materials plotted according to their emission wavelengths, highlighting their potential biological application windows. [Reproduced with permission [140]. Copyright 2005, Springer Nature] (b) Time resolved photoluminescence decay curves of didodecyl dimethylammonium bromide (DDAB)/tetraoctylammonium bromide (TOAB) capped CsPbBr3 QD film at diffe… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) based fluorescence thermometry (a) Schematic illustration of the Yb/Ho/Ce:NaGdF4@Yb/Tm:NaYF4 core–shell nanostructure, along with temperature-dependent upconversion emission spectra recorded under 980 nm excitation and normalized to the green emission peak, and a histogram showing the integrated intensities of the blue, green, and red emission bands as a function of tempe… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fluorescence nanothermometry for micro/nanoelectronics. (a) The current-induced temperature rise was spatially mapped along an 80-µm-long, 2-µm-wide, and 40-nm-thick Ni wire using the temperature-dependent fluorescence intensity of Rhodamine B. [Reproduced with permission [163]. Copyright 2008, John Wiley and Sons] (b) Temperature rise measured using SiV–GeV codoped nanodiamonds at multiple locations on a … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Three-dimensional temperature mapping with Fluorescence thermometry. (a) Rendered three-dimensional image of fluorescence lifetime data acquired from a 100-µm-long microchannel segment filled with a methanolic rhodamine B solution. Temperature profiles as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The transition of materials and devices to nanometer, atomic, and quantum scales makes thermal characterization increasingly challenging, driving the need for advanced nanoscale thermometry. Fluorescence nanothermometry has emerged as a powerful approach, enabling remote, spatially resolved temperature measurements with sub-micrometer-to-nanometer precision across applications in nanoelectronics, microfluidics, and biological systems. In these systems, temperature is inferred from variations in fluorescence observables, including spectral position, intensity, linewidth, and excited-state dynamics. This review provides a comprehensive and critical overview of fluorescence nanothermometry, covering fundamental mechanisms, material platforms, recent advances, and emerging applications. It further presents a critical evaluation of key challenges and discusses emerging strategies and future research directions toward achieving robust, real-time thermometry. It is anticipated that this review will stimulate further advances in material platforms and system design, accelerating the development of accurate, scalable, and application-ready nanoscale thermometers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article on nanoscale fluorescence thermometry. It surveys fundamental mechanisms by which temperature affects fluorescence observables (spectral position, intensity, linewidth, and excited-state dynamics), material platforms used as probes, recent advances, key challenges in achieving robust real-time measurements, emerging strategies, and future research directions. The central forward-looking statement is that the overview will stimulate advances in material platforms and system design for accurate, scalable nanoscale thermometers, with applications in nanoelectronics, microfluidics, and biological systems.

Significance. As a literature synthesis without new experimental results, derivations, or quantitative predictions, the review could be useful for consolidating knowledge in an interdisciplinary area if it delivers a balanced, critical evaluation of mechanisms, platforms, and challenges. Credit is due for framing the discussion around practical requirements (remote, spatially resolved, sub-micrometer-to-nanometer precision) and for identifying the transition to atomic/quantum scales as a driver for new thermometry approaches.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the review 'provides a comprehensive and critical overview' and 'presents a critical evaluation of key challenges,' but the provided text does not include concrete examples of how specific mechanisms or platforms are critiqued for limitations (e.g., temperature range, sensitivity, or biocompatibility). Adding one or two explicit case studies of such evaluations in the main text would strengthen the claim of criticality.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of our review on nanoscale fluorescence thermometry. We appreciate the acknowledgment of the manuscript's scope, its framing around practical requirements for remote and spatially resolved measurements, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: descriptive review without derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a literature review paper that synthesizes existing work on fluorescence nanothermometry mechanisms, material platforms, advances, challenges, and future directions. It contains no original equations, derivations, fitted parameters, quantitative predictions, or modeling steps. The sole forward-looking claim is a non-falsifiable expectation that the overview will stimulate progress, which does not depend on any internal assumption, self-citation chain, or reduction to inputs. No load-bearing steps exist that could be circular by construction, self-definition, or renaming. The paper is self-contained as a descriptive summary against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper that introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it synthesizes existing published work on fluorescence nanothermometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5523 in / 980 out tokens · 35172 ms · 2026-05-09T21:36:27.187601+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

204 extracted references · 184 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    DOI 10.1038/cr.2011.117

    Wang, C.; Xu, R.; Tian, W., et al., Cell Research 2011, 21 (10), 1517 –1519. DOI 10.1038/cr.2011.117

  2. [2]

    DOI 10.1038/s42003-021-02908-2

    Okabe, K.; Uchiyama, S., Communications Biology 2021, 4 (1), 1377. DOI 10.1038/s42003-021-02908-2

  3. [3]

    DOI 10.1088/1361-6501/ab4b6b

    Rosso, L.; Tabandeh, S.; Beltramino, G.; Fernicola, V., Measurement Science and Technology 2020, 31 (3), 034002. DOI 10.1088/1361-6501/ab4b6b

  4. [4]

    Swoboda, T.; Gao, X.; Rosário, C. M. M., et al., ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2023, 5 (9), 5025–5031. DOI 10.1021/acsaelm.3c00782

  5. [5]

    DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202202887

    Li, G.; Su, Z.; Li, M., et al., Advanced Energy Materials 2022, 12 (48), 2202887. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202202887

  6. [6]

    DOI 10.1021/acsami.2c15687

    Li, F.; Xue, H.; Lin, X.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, T., Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (38), 43844–43852. DOI 10.1021/acsami.2c15687

  7. [7]

    DOI 10.1039/d3tc04716d

    Jurga, N.; Runowski, M.; Grzyb, T., Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2024, 12 (32), 12218–12248. DOI 10.1039/d3tc04716d

  8. [8]

    G., Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2016, 230 (5), 793 –806

    Ross-Pinnock, D.; Maropoulos, P. G., Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2016, 230 (5), 793 –806. DOI 10.1177/0954405414567929

  9. [9]

    Temperature Sensors Market Size & Share Analysis https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/temperature-sensors-market-industry (accessed March 18, 2026)

  10. [10]

    W.; Gillies, G

    Allison, S. W.; Gillies, G. T., Review of Scientific Instruments 1997, 68 (7), 2615–2650. DOI 10.1063/1.1148174

  11. [11]

    M.; Hernandez -Charpak, J

    Hoogeboom-Pot, K. M.; Hernandez -Charpak, J. N.; Gu, X., et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2015, 112 (16), 4846–4851. DOI 10.1073/pnas.1503449112

  12. [12]

    Brites, C. D. S.; Balabhadra, S.; Carlos, L. D., Advanced Optical Materials 2019, 7 (5), 1801239. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201801239. 52

  13. [13]

    D.; Lima, P

    Brites, C. D.; Lima, P. P.; Silva, N. J., et al., Nanoscale 2012, 4 (16), 4799–829. DOI 10.1039/c2nr30663h

  14. [15]

    DOI 10.1038/s41592-020-0957-y

    Zhou, J.; del Rosal, B.; Jaque, D.; Uchiyama, S.; Jin, D., Nature Methods 2020, 17 (10), 967–980. DOI 10.1038/s41592-020-0957-y

  15. [16]

    D., ACS Nanoscience Au 2024, 4 (1), 30–

    Harrington, B.; Ye, Z.; Signor, L.; Pickel, A. D., ACS Nanoscience Au 2024, 4 (1), 30–

  16. [17]

    DOI 10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.3c00051

  17. [18]

    Bai, T.; Gu, N., Small 2016, 12 (34), 4590–4610

  18. [19]

    del Rosal, B.; Ximendes, E.; Rocha, U.; Jaque, D., Advanced Optical Materials 2017, 5 (1), 1600508

  19. [20]

    Jaque, D.; Vetrone, F., Nanoscale 2012, 4 (15), 4301–4326

  20. [21]

    M., Chemical Society Reviews 2022, 51 (11), 4223–4242

    Quintanilla, M.; Henriksen -Lacey, M.; Renero -Lecuna, C.; Liz -Marzán, L. M., Chemical Society Reviews 2022, 51 (11), 4223–4242. DOI 10.1039/D2CS00069E

  21. [22]

    J.; Pujol, M

    Nexha, A.; Carvajal, J. J.; Pujol, M. C.; Díaz, F.; Aguiló, M., Nanoscale 2021, 13 (17), 7913–7987. DOI 10.1039/d0nr09150b

  22. [23]

    DOI 10.3389/fchem.2022.941861

    Rodríguez-Sevilla, P.; Marin, R.; Ximendes, E., et al., Frontiers in Chemistry 2022, Volume 10 - 2022. DOI 10.3389/fchem.2022.941861

  23. [24]

    DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202000319

    Suo, H.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Z., et al., Laser & Photonics Reviews 2021, 15 (1), 2000319. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202000319

  24. [25]

    DOI 10.1088/0957-0233/13/10/702

    Michalski, L.; Eckersdorf, K.; Kucharski, J.; McGhee, J., Measurement Science and Technology 2002, 13 (10), 1651. DOI 10.1088/0957-0233/13/10/702

  25. [26]

    F.; Chang, H

    Bradac, C.; Lim, S. F.; Chang, H. C.; Aharonovich, I., Advanced Optical Materials 2020, 8 (15), 2000183. DOI 10.1002/adom.202000183

  26. [27]

    Steur, P. P. M.; Durieux, M., Metrologia 1986, 23 (1), 1. DOI 10.1088/0026 - 1394/23/1/002

  27. [28]

    F.; Benz, S

    Qu, J. F.; Benz, S. P.; Rogalla, H., et al., Meas Sci Technol 2019, 30 (11). DOI 10.1088/1361-6501/ab3526

  28. [29]

    W.; Siddiqi, I.; Schoelkopf, R

    Spietz, L.; Lehnert, K. W.; Siddiqi, I.; Schoelkopf, R. J., Science 2003, 300 (5627), 1929–32. DOI 10.1126/science.1084647

  29. [30]

    Bell, J. F. W., Ultrasonics 1968, 6 (1), 11 –14. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0041- 624X(68)90009-7

  30. [31]

    T.; Pekola, J

    Blanchet, F.; Chang, Y.-C.; Karimi, B.; Peltonen, J. T.; Pekola, J. P., Physical Review Applied 2022, 17 (1), L011003. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.L011003

  31. [32]

    DOI 10.1098/rsta.2015.0037

    Fellmuth, B.; Fischer, J.; Machin, G., et al., Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2016, 374 (2064), 20150037. DOI 10.1098/rsta.2015.0037

  32. [33]

    G., Cryogenics 1997, 37 (7), 341–356

    Rubin, L. G., Cryogenics 1997, 37 (7), 341–356. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011- 2275(97)00009-X

  33. [34]

    Rusby, R.; Hudson, R.; Durieux, M., et al., Metrologia 1991, 28 (1), 9

  34. [35]

    D.; Palacio, F., Thermometry at the Nanoscale: Techniques and Selected Applications

    Carlos, L. D.; Palacio, F., Thermometry at the Nanoscale: Techniques and Selected Applications. RSC: 2015

  35. [36]

    https://www.strategicrevenueinsights.com/industry/optical-temperature-sensors-market (accessed March 18, 2025)

    Optical Temperature Sensors Market Size, Future Growth and Forecast 2033. https://www.strategicrevenueinsights.com/industry/optical-temperature-sensors-market (accessed March 18, 2025)

  36. [37]

    DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201900892

    Zhang, Y.; Zhu, W.; Hui, F., et al., Advanced Functional Materials 2020, 30 (18), 1900892. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201900892

  37. [38]

    D.; Lee, W.; Durham, D

    Palmer, L. D.; Lee, W.; Durham, D. B., et al., ACS Physical Chemistry Au 2025, 5 (6), 589–598. DOI 10.1021/acsphyschemau.5c00044

  38. [39]

    DOI 10.2174/978160805143411201010003

    Meola, C., Infrared Thermography: Recent Advances and Future Trends 2012, 3–28. DOI 10.2174/978160805143411201010003. 53

  39. [40]

    Time -domain thermoreflectance,

    Mohan, R.; Khan, S.; Wilson, R. B.; Hopkins, P. E., Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2025, 5 (1), 55. DOI 10.1038/s43586-025-00425-8

  40. [41]

    G., Review of Scientific Instruments 2004, 75 (12), 5119 –5122

    Cahill, D. G., Review of Scientific Instruments 2004, 75 (12), 5119 –5122. DOI 10.1063/1.1819431

  41. [42]

    G.; Goodson, K.; Majumdar, A., Journal of Heat Transfer 2001, 124 (2), 223–

    Cahill, D. G.; Goodson, K.; Majumdar, A., Journal of Heat Transfer 2001, 124 (2), 223–

  42. [43]

    DOI 10.1115/1.1454111

  43. [44]

    Tuschel, D.; Adar, F., Spectroscopy 2016, 31 (12), 8–13

  44. [45]

    DOI doi:10.1126/sciadv.adl1015

    Meng, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y., et al., Science Advances 2024, 10 (3), eadl1015. DOI doi:10.1126/sciadv.adl1015

  45. [46]

    -O., physica status solidi (a) 2015, 212 (3), 477–494

    Gomès, S.; Assy, A.; Chapuis, P. -O., physica status solidi (a) 2015, 212 (3), 477–494. DOI 10.1002/pssa.201400360

  46. [47]

    J.; Reddy, P., Nano Letters 2010, 10 (7), 2613–2617

    Sadat, S.; Tan, A.; Chua, Y. J.; Reddy, P., Nano Letters 2010, 10 (7), 2613–2617. DOI 10.1021/nl101354e

  47. [48]

    S.; Phelan, P

    Prasher, R. S.; Phelan, P. E., Journal of Applied Physics 2006, 100 (6). DOI 10.1063/1.2353704

  48. [49]

    A.; White, E

    Mecklenburg, M.; Hubbard, W. A.; White, E. R., et al., Science 2015, 347 (6222), 629–

  49. [50]

    DOI 10.1126/science.aaa2433

  50. [51]

    DOI 10.1109/tie.2021.3120471

    Deng, B.; Wu, W.; Li, X., et al., IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2022, 69 (11), 11774–11784. DOI 10.1109/tie.2021.3120471

  51. [52]

    DOI 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.05.009

    Landmann, M.; Heist, S.; Dietrich, P., et al., Optics and Lasers in Engineering 2019, 121, 448–455. DOI 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.05.009

  52. [53]

    G.; Sauthier, M.; Leonard, D., et al., Analytical Chemistry 2006, 78 (10), 3282–3288

    Cerruti, M. G.; Sauthier, M.; Leonard, D., et al., Analytical Chemistry 2006, 78 (10), 3282–3288. DOI 10.1021/ac0600555

  53. [54]

    DOI 10.1063/1.5046944

    Jiang, P.; Qian, X.; Yang, R., Journal of Applied Physics 2018, 124 (16), 161103. DOI 10.1063/1.5046944

  54. [55]

    H.; Tiernan, E

    Milich, M.; Olson, D. H.; Tiernan, E. M., et al., Acta Materialia 2025, 288, 120802. DOI 10.1016/j.actamat.2025.120802

  55. [56]

    K.; Bae, M.-H.; Cahill, D

    Koh, Y. K.; Bae, M.-H.; Cahill, D. G.; Pop, E., Nano Letters 2010, 10 (11), 4363–4368. DOI 10.1021/nl101790k

  56. [57]

    N.; Ho, V

    Ngo, D. N.; Ho, V. T. T. X.; Kim, G., et al., Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (17), 6463–

  57. [58]

    DOI 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04452

  58. [59]

    S.; Paliouras, M., et al., ACS Applied Nano Materials 2024, 7 (17), 20942–20953

    Oudjedi, F.; Lee, S. S.; Paliouras, M., et al., ACS Applied Nano Materials 2024, 7 (17), 20942–20953. DOI 10.1021/acsanm.4c03865

  59. [60]

    -J.; Liu, Z

    Park, T.; Guan, Y. -J.; Liu, Z. -Q.; Zhang, Y., Physical Review Applied 2018, 10 (3), 034049. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.034049

  60. [61]

    -i., Advanced Optical Materials 2022, 10 (22), 2201675

    Kumar, K.; Stefanczyk, O.; Chorazy, S.; Nakabayashi, K.; Ohkoshi, S. -i., Advanced Optical Materials 2022, 10 (22), 2201675. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202201675

  61. [62]

    Li, P.; Askes, S. H. C.; del Pino Rosendo, E., et al., The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (20), 9690–9698. DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01561

  62. [63]

    DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202201664

    Rodríguez-Sevilla, P.; Spicer, G.; Sagrera, A., et al., Advanced Optical Materials 2023, 11 (11), 2201664. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202201664

  63. [64]

    D.; Kolosov, O

    Tovee, P. D.; Kolosov, O. V., Nanotechnology 2013, 24 (46), 465706. DOI 10.1088/0957-4484/24/46/465706

  64. [65]

    L.; Merchiers, O.; Chapuis, P

    Nguyen, K. L.; Merchiers, O.; Chapuis, P. O., Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 2017, 202, 154–167. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.07.021

  65. [66]

    C.; Cronin, S

    Shen, L.; Mecklenburg, M.; Dhall, R.; Regan, B. C.; Cronin, S. B., Applied Physics Letters 2019, 115 (15). DOI 10.1063/1.5094443

  66. [67]

    DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.055902

    Hu, X.; Yasaei, P.; Jokisaari, J., et al., Physical Review Letters 2018, 120 (5), 055902. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.055902

  67. [68]

    D., Methods Appl Fluoresc 2016, 4 (4), 042001

    Dramićanin, M. D., Methods Appl Fluoresc 2016, 4 (4), 042001. DOI 10.1088/2050 - 6120/4/4/042001. 54

  68. [69]

    Radiation thermometer

    Neubert, P. Radiation thermometer. 1937

  69. [70]

    W., Measurement Science and Technology 2019, 30 (7), 072001

    Allison, S. W., Measurement Science and Technology 2019, 30 (7), 072001. DOI 10.1088/1361-6501/ab1d02

  70. [71]

    R.; Pearlman, D., Journal of the Optical Society of America 1949, 39 (12), 1011–1019

    Urbach, F.; Nail, N. R.; Pearlman, D., Journal of the Optical Society of America 1949, 39 (12), 1011–1019. DOI 10.1364/JOSA.39.001011

  71. [72]

    https://www.advancedenergy.com/en-us/products/sense- and-measurement/thermal-sensing/fiber-optic-sensors/ (accessed 30 January)

    Advance Energy Industries. https://www.advancedenergy.com/en-us/products/sense- and-measurement/thermal-sensing/fiber-optic-sensors/ (accessed 30 January)

  72. [73]

    DOI 10.1021/jp026445m

    Wang, S.; Westcott, S.; Chen, W., The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2002, 106 (43), 11203–11209. DOI 10.1021/jp026445m

  73. [74]

    P.; Iwai, K., Analytical Chemistry 2003, 75 (21), 5926–5935

    Uchiyama, S.; Matsumura, Y.; de Silva, A. P.; Iwai, K., Analytical Chemistry 2003, 75 (21), 5926–5935. DOI 10.1021/ac0346914

  74. [75]

    Brites, C. D. S.; Marin, R.; Suta, M., et al., Advanced Materials 2023, 35, 2302749. DOI 10.1002/adma.202302749

  75. [76]

    DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201601953

    del Rosal, B.; Carrasco, E.; Ren, F., et al., Advanced Functional Materials 2016, 26 (33), 6060–6068. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201601953

  76. [77]

    DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202102807

    Yang, J.; Du, H.; Chai, Z., et al., Small 2021, 17 (39), 2102807. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202102807

  77. [78]

    E., et al., Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (23), 26525–26533

    Foy, C.; Zhang, L.; Trusheim, M. E., et al., Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (23), 26525–26533. DOI 10.1021/acsami.0c01545

  78. [79]

    W.; van den Bulk, M

    Vogel, R.; Groefsema, D. W.; van den Bulk, M. A., et al., Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces 2025, 17 (14), 21215–21222. DOI 10.1021/acsami.5c00243

  79. [80]

    E.; Brites, C

    Maturi, F. E.; Brites, C. D. S.; Silva, R. R., et al., Advanced Photonics Research 2022, 3 (6), 2100227. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202100227

  80. [81]

    Brites, C. D. S.; Xie, X.; Debasu, M. L., et al., Nature Nanotechnology 2016, 11 (10), 851–856. DOI 10.1038/nnano.2016.111

Showing first 80 references.