pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21322 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

Turbulent infall onto class 0 disks as cause of CAI brief condensation episode in the solar system

Jiachen Zheng , Xing Wei , Hongping Deng , Wenrui Xu , Douglas N. C. Lin
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 13:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords CAIsclass 0 disksprotoplanetary diskssolar system formationinfallcondensationmeteoritesturbulence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dynamic infall onto class 0 disks sublimates pre-solar CAIs and allows their rapid re-condensation within 100 kyr.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses numerical simulations to show that the brief condensation episode of calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs) in meteorites can result from turbulent gas infall during the formation of class 0 disks. Infalling streamers cause warps and spiral density waves in the disk, leading to dissipation that heats the gas enough to sublimate existing CAI grains in the 2-3 AU region. After this heating, the gas cools and the grains re-condense, creating a short window of about 100 kyr for this process. This mechanism explains why CAIs appear to form in a brief episode even though the star-forming environment is polluted over millions of years. If correct, the CAIs we see today are the products of the final major infall phase onto the early solar disk.

Core claim

Through hydrodynamic simulations of gas infall onto forming class 0 disks, the authors find that warps and global spiral density waves generated by the dynamic interaction with infalling streamers cause intense dissipation. This dissipation heats the disk gas to temperatures sufficient to sublimate prior-generation CAI-loaded grains across an extended region of 2 to 3 AU. The subsequent cooling leads to re-condensation, producing the observed brief condensation episode of about 100 kyr, with the CAIs in meteorites representing relics from the last major infall event.

What carries the argument

The dynamical interaction of infalling gas streamers with the circumstellar disk, which generates warps and global spiral density waves that drive rapid energy dissipation and thermal cycling.

If this is right

  • Pre-solar CAI grains in the 2-3 AU region are almost entirely sublimated and reset during the early infall phase lasting less than 100,000 years.
  • The brief CAI condensation age spread is a direct consequence of this single thermal episode rather than continuous formation.
  • Class 0 disks undergo significant and rapid changes in orientation and morphology due to external streamers.
  • CAIs observed in carbonaceous chondrites today are the end products of the final major infall onto the protosolar disk.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This process might occur in other forming planetary systems, leading to similar reset episodes for early solids.
  • Observations of temperature structures in class 0 disks could test whether sublimation temperatures are reached.
  • Further modeling could explore how this affects the distribution of other refractory materials or short-lived isotopes.
  • The mechanism provides a link between the dynamics of cluster formation and the chemistry of the solar nebula.

Load-bearing premise

The dissipation from warps and spiral density waves must produce temperatures high enough to sublimate CAIs throughout the 2-3 AU region, and this must be the last major heating episode.

What would settle it

Detection of CAIs with a wider range of formation ages or evidence that class 0 disk temperatures never reach CAI sublimation levels during infall.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21322 by Douglas N. C. Lin, Hongping Deng, Jiachen Zheng, Wenrui Xu, Xing Wei.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: These panels highlight the initial temperature distributions in the vicinity of the newborn stars. The slices have a thickness of 1 AU and extend to radii <30 AU. The left panel shows data for Run 1, and the right panel for Run 2. disk. These snapshots provide insights into the gradual development of the system over time, with significant changes in the disk’s structure, temperature, and density as materia… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The figures show snapshots of the system’s global evolution, arranged in reading order from left to right, top to bottom. The first panel in the top left show the initial density distributions of Run 1 with the box size of 2000 AU. while the subsequent eight images cover the equally separated (by 2000 years) episodes from 1000 to 15,000 years. The box size for the last eight snapshots is 400 AU. Each box’s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The figure shows zoom-in views of the density (in unit of M⊙/AU2 ) and velocity fields, focusing on sub-regions extracted from the original simulation domain displayed in view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The panel shows the time evolution of the maximum disk temperature (solid line, left axis) and stellar accretion rate M˙ ⋆ (dashed line, right axis). The two quantities exhibit similar trends, with a sharp rise during the main heating phase. To mitigate the impact of numerical outliers, a representative near-maximum temperature is used instead of the absolute peak value. mass, total disk mass, stellar accr… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The plots show the direction of specific angular momentum vector at various radius and times for Run 1. (Here, “radius” refers to the spherical distance from the star, the polar angle θ is measured from the +zˆ axis of the inertial frame, and the azimuth ϕ is measured in the x–y plane from +xˆ toward +yˆ.) The left panel represents the polar angle θ, while the right panel shows the azimuthal angle ϕ. Both … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evolution of key disk properties over time. Panels show (top to bottom): maximum disk temperature, stellar mass, total disk mass, stellar accretion rate M˙ ⋆, and infall rate from the envelope. Infall events correlate with accretion bursts and temperature rises, indicating that envelope feeding significantly influences disk heating and accretion activity. The disk is defined as the region where the rotatio… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Side view of the disk in the x ′ − z ′ plane(left) y ′ − z ′ plane(right), showing the distribution of entropy overlaid with velocity vectors. The arrows represent the direction and relative magnitude of the velocity field. High-entropy, shock-heated infall flows are visible above and below the disk surfaces in both directions view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same views as in view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Upper: Temperature distribution of the disk in the (r,z ′ ) plane. Colors represent gas temperature in Kelvin. The inner disk (r ≲ 5 AU) shows elevated temperatures about 2000 K, indicating strong heating near the midplane. Lower: The left panels display scatter plots of the temperature distribution in the disk’s midplane, within a radius of 5 AU and a disk height of 0.1 AU. Note that the temperature distr… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The left panel shows the r − ϕ distribution of temperature in the midplane, with the same physical parameter settings as the left panel of Fig.9. The right panel shows the radial profiles of the specific entropy jump δ for an azimuthal slice (-0.05< ϕ <0.05) of the disk view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The left panel shows the profile of the Toomre number Q maps. The right panel shows the time-averaged stress profiles αG, αR, and αtot. with δvr and δvϕ the fluctuations of radial and azimuthal velocities, and gr, gϕ the radial and azimuthal components of the self-gravitational acceleration (Lynden-Bell & Kalnajs 1972). The effective viscosity parameter Shakura & Sunyaev (1973) associated with these stres… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The figures show snapshots of the system’s global evolution. The first panel in the top left show the initial density distributions of Run 2 with the box size of 2000 AU, while the subsequent three images cover episodes 1,000, 8,000, and 15,000 yrs. The box size for the last three snapshots is 400 AU. The colorbar indicates the column density (in unit of M⊙/AU2 ) obtained by integrating the gas density al… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: This panel, similar to view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The plots show the direction of specific angular momentum at various radius and times for Run 2. The left panel represents the polar angle θ, while the right panel shows the azimuthal angle ϕ. The horizontal marker at 0.5–65 AU indicates the average disk radius across different times; the actual disk radius varies with time view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Evolution of the relative temperature increase, (T − Tref)/Tref, for Run 1 (with infall; red) and Run 2 (without infall; blue). The presence of infall in Run 1 leads to a distinct, sustained heating phase at t ∼ 6–9×103 yr, while Run 2 remains comparatively cool throughout the evolution. high-temperature phase is not observed in the absence of infall. By contrast, Run 2 exhibits only modest temperature en… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Midplane density structure of the disk at t = 1000 yr for simulations with increasingly higher numerical resolution. From left to right and continuing on the second row, the total number of particles is 1M, 2M, 5M, 10M, and 20M. a mechanism for both the formation and preservation of high-temperature meteoritic components in protoplanetary disks. Acknowledgments: We thank Mathew Bate for providing the resu… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Midplane temperature structure of the disk at t = 1000 yr for simulations with increasingly higher numerical resolution. From left to right and continuing on the second row, the total number of particles is 1M, 2M, 5M, 10M, and 20M. star (see view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs) in carbonaceous chondritic meteorites are the oldest relics in the solar system. Notably, their radiogenic age feature a brief (100 kyr) condensation episode. In contrast, the reservoirs of the short-lived isotopes in CAIs, presumably supernovae or asymptotic giant stars, pollutes star-forming regions in giant molecular cloud complexes (GMC) over much longer (Myr) duration. Through a series of numerical simulations, we show here the possibility that, within an extended region (2$\sim$3 AU), nearly all ``pre-solar'' CAI-loaded grains in the infall clouds were sublimated and re-condensed during the early ($ \lesssim 10^5$ yr) infall and formation of class-0 disks. We adopt a set of initial conditions from a previous hydrodynamic simulation of the collapse of GMC and the formation of young stellar clusters. We analyze the evolution of the disk's thermal distribution and dynamical structure resulting from the interaction between circumstellar disks and infalling gas. Our follow-up simulations, with much higher resolution, show significant and rapid changes in the disk orientation and morphology due to the dynamic infall of external streamers. Warps and global spiral density waves commonly appear. They lead to intense dissipation which heats the gas to sufficiently high temperature to sublimate prior-generation CAIs. This solid-to-gas phase transition is followed by subsequent cooling and re-condensation. The CAI contained in the meteorites today could be the relics of the last episode of major infall onto class 0 disks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that dynamic infall of gas streamers onto class-0 protostellar disks generates warps and global spiral density waves whose dissipation produces temperatures high enough to sublimate nearly all pre-existing CAI-loaded grains across an extended 2–3 AU annulus during the first ≲10^5 yr of disk formation; subsequent cooling then allows re-condensation, providing a dynamical explanation for the observed ~100 kyr CAI condensation window despite longer (Myr) pollution timescales from supernovae in GMCs. The argument rests on high-resolution follow-up hydrodynamic simulations that adopt initial conditions from a prior GMC-collapse run.

Significance. If the central claim is quantitatively confirmed, the work supplies a concrete, simulation-based mechanism that links the turbulent assembly of class-0 disks to the meteoritic record, potentially resolving a long-standing tension between CAI chronology and the extended star-forming environment. The reuse of initial conditions from an earlier published collapse calculation is a methodological strength that enhances traceability, though the absence of shared code or parameter files limits immediate reproducibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results] Results section (description of follow-up simulations and thermal evolution): the manuscript states that warp and spiral dissipation heats the gas 'to sufficiently high temperature to sublimate prior-generation CAIs' across 2–3 AU, yet supplies no radial temperature profiles, time-averaged T(r) maps, peak-temperature histograms, or resolution-convergence tests at those radii. Without these data the claim that 'nearly all' pre-solar grains are processed remains an unverified assertion rather than a demonstrated outcome.
  2. [Methods] Methods (initial conditions and resolution): the follow-up runs are described only qualitatively as 'much higher resolution' without stating the achieved spatial resolution, number of cells or particles, or the treatment of radiative cooling and grain opacities. These omissions make it impossible to assess whether the reported heating is robust once realistic thermodynamics are included.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'pre-solar' CAI-loaded grains is placed in quotation marks without a clear definition; a brief parenthetical clarifying that these are grains inherited from the parent molecular cloud would improve readability.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (thermal and morphological panels): several panels lack explicit color-bar units or time stamps, making it difficult to connect the visualized structures directly to the claimed temperature thresholds.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to incorporate the requested quantitative information and numerical details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section (description of follow-up simulations and thermal evolution): the manuscript states that warp and spiral dissipation heats the gas 'to sufficiently high temperature to sublimate prior-generation CAIs' across 2–3 AU, yet supplies no radial temperature profiles, time-averaged T(r) maps, peak-temperature histograms, or resolution-convergence tests at those radii. Without these data the claim that 'nearly all' pre-solar grains are processed remains an unverified assertion rather than a demonstrated outcome.

    Authors: We agree that the Results section requires additional quantitative diagnostics to substantiate the thermal processing claim. In the revised manuscript we will include radial temperature profiles at representative times during the infall, time-averaged T(r) maps over the first 10^5 yr, histograms of peak temperatures experienced by Lagrangian fluid elements within the 2–3 AU annulus, and resolution-convergence tests at those radii. These additions will demonstrate that dissipation produces temperatures sufficient for sublimation of prior-generation CAIs across the extended region. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods (initial conditions and resolution): the follow-up runs are described only qualitatively as 'much higher resolution' without stating the achieved spatial resolution, number of cells or particles, or the treatment of radiative cooling and grain opacities. These omissions make it impossible to assess whether the reported heating is robust once realistic thermodynamics are included.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for explicit numerical specifications. In the revised Methods section we will report the achieved spatial resolution (including cell or particle counts), the precise treatment of radiative cooling, and the grain opacity model employed. These details will enable assessment of the robustness of the reported heating under realistic thermodynamics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claim emerges from independent hydrodynamic simulations

full rationale

The paper derives its central claim—that dynamic infall produces warps and global spirals whose dissipation heats gas sufficiently to sublimate pre-solar CAIs across 2–3 AU—from new, higher-resolution follow-up simulations. Initial conditions are adopted from a prior GMC-collapse run (explicitly external to the present analysis), but the thermal and morphological evolution, including dissipation heating, is computed as an emergent outcome of the hydrodynamics rather than imposed by definition, fit, or self-referential equation. No load-bearing step reduces the result to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz smuggled via citation. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on hydrodynamic simulations whose initial conditions are taken from prior work and on the assumption that disk heating reaches CAI sublimation temperatures.

free parameters (1)
  • Initial conditions from prior GMC collapse simulation
    Adopted wholesale from an earlier hydrodynamic simulation of giant molecular cloud collapse and cluster formation.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Infalling streamers produce warps and spiral waves whose dissipation heats the disk gas above the CAI sublimation temperature in the 2-3 AU region.
    This thermal-processing step is required for the sublimation-recondensation cycle to occur.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5608 in / 1244 out tokens · 69096 ms · 2026-05-08T13:40:30.242178+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    From Pre-Stellar Cores to Protostars: The Initial Conditions of Star Formation

    Andre, P., Ward-Thompson, D., & Barsony, M. 1999, arXiv preprint astro-ph/9903284

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999

  2. [2]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 401, 1505

    Bate, M., Lodato, G., & Pringle, J. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 401, 1505

    2010

  3. [3]

    Bate, M. R. 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 419, 3115 —. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 484, 2341

    2012

  4. [4]

    R., Bonnell, I

    Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Price, N. M. 1995, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 277, 362

    1995

  5. [5]

    R., & Lin, D

    Bell, K. R., & Lin, D. N. C. 1994, ApJ, 427, 987, doi: 10.1086/174206

    work page doi:10.1086/174206 1994

  6. [6]

    R., & Lin, D

    Bell, K. R., & Lin, D. N. C. 1994, The Astrophysical Journal, 427, 987

    1994

  7. [7]

    R., Lin, D

    Bell, K. R., Lin, D. N. C., Hartmann, L. W., & Kenyon, S. J. 1995, ApJ, 444, 376, doi: 10.1086/175612

    work page doi:10.1086/175612 1995

  8. [8]

    2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 549, A124

    Dobbs-Dixon, I. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 549, A124

    2013

  9. [9]

    1995, Meteoritics, 30, 133

    Cameron, A. 1995, Meteoritics, 30, 133

    1995

  10. [10]

    2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 705, 1206

    Chambers, J. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 705, 1206

    2009

  11. [11]

    2015, The Early Earth: Accretion and Differentiation, 1

    Chaussidon, M., & Liu, M.-C. 2015, The Early Earth: Accretion and Differentiation, 1

    2015

  12. [12]

    N., Bizzarro, M., Krot, A

    Connelly, J. N., Bizzarro, M., Krot, A. N., et al. 2012, Science, 338, 651

    2012

  13. [13]

    F., & Bai, X.-N

    Deng, H., Mayer, L., Latter, H., Hopkins, P. F., & Bai, X.-N. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 241, 26

    2019

  14. [14]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 847, 43

    Deng, H., Mayer, L., & Meru, F. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 847, 43

    2017

  15. [15]

    Deng, H., & Ogilvie, G. I. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 512, 6078

    2022

  16. [16]

    I., & Mayer, L

    Deng, H., Ogilvie, G. I., & Mayer, L. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 500, 4248

    2021

  17. [17]

    C., Alves, J., & Lin, D

    Forbes, J. C., Alves, J., & Lin, D. N. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 1009

    2021

  18. [18]

    2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 394, 882

    Forgan, D., Rice, K., Stamatellos, D., & Whitworth, A. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 394, 882

    2009

  19. [19]

    N., & Mayer, L

    Fu, Z., Deng, H., Lin, D. N., & Mayer, L. 2025, Science Advances, 11, eadu6058

    2025

  20. [20]

    1974, Nature, 251, 495

    Gray, C., & Compston, W. 1974, Nature, 251, 495

    1974

  21. [21]

    Gritschneder, M., Lin, D. N. C., Murray, S. D., Yin, Q. Z., & Gong, M. N. 2012, ApJ, 745, 22, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/22 21

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/22 2012

  22. [22]

    1980, In: Annual review of earth and planetary sciences

    Grossman, L. 1980, In: Annual review of earth and planetary sciences. Volume 8.(A80-37593 15-42) Palo

    1980

  23. [23]

    Alto, Calif., Annual Reviews, Inc., 1980, p. 559-608. Research supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation;, 8, 559

    1980

  24. [24]

    S., & Simon, S

    Grossman, L., Ebel, D. S., & Simon, S. B. 2002b, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 66, 145 Grudić, M. Y., Guszejnov, D., Hopkins, P. F., Offner, S. S., & Faucher-Giguère, C.-A. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 506, 2199

    2021

  25. [25]

    2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 582, A41

    Harsono, D., Bruderer, S., & Van Dishoeck, E. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 582, A41

    2015

  26. [26]

    Hartmann, L., & Kenyon, S. J. 1996, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 34, 207

    1996

  27. [27]

    Hopkins, P. F. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 450, 53

    2015

  28. [28]

    R., Fahey, A., & Zinner, E

    Ireland, T. R., Fahey, A., & Zinner, E. 1988, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 52, 2841

    1988

  29. [29]

    2008, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 272, 353

    Jacobsen, B., Yin, Q.-z., Moynier, F., et al. 2008, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 272, 353

    2008

  30. [30]

    2024, Space Science Reviews, 220, 78

    Jacquet, E., Dullemond, C., Drążkowska, J., & Desch, S. 2024, Space Science Reviews, 220, 78

    2024

  31. [31]

    1961, Journal of Geophysical Research, 66, 3582

    Jeffery, P., & Reynolds, J. 1961, Journal of Geophysical Research, 66, 3582

    1961

  32. [32]

    1976, Geophys

    Lee, T., Papanastassiou, D., & Wasserburg, G. 1976, Geophys. Res. Lett, 3, 109

    1976

  33. [33]

    Lee, T., & Papanastassiou, D. A. 1974, Geophysical Research Letters, 1, 225

    1974

  34. [34]

    2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 358, 1489

    Lodato, G., & Rice, W. 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 358, 1489

    2005

  35. [35]

    2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 591, 1220 Lombardi Jr, J

    Lodders, K. 2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 591, 1220 Lombardi Jr, J. C., McInally, W. G., & Faber, J. A. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 447, 25

    2003

  36. [36]

    1972, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 157, 1

    Lynden-Bell, D., & Kalnajs, A. 1972, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 157, 1

    1972

  37. [37]

    2012, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 331, 43

    Davis, A. 2012, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 331, 43

    2012

  38. [38]

    2005, in Chondrites and the protoplanetary disk, Vol

    Krot, A. 2005, in Chondrites and the protoplanetary disk, Vol. 341, 225

    2005

  39. [39]

    2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 677, A136

    Marschall, R., & Morbidelli, A. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 677, A136

    2023

  40. [40]

    2025, Nature, 643, 649

    McClure, M., Van’t Hoff, M., Francis, L., et al. 2025, Nature, 643, 649

    2025

  41. [41]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 995, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae16a4 O’D

    Ni, Y., Deng, H., & Bai, X.-N. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 995, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae16a4 O’D. Alexander, C., Boss, A., & Carlson, R. 2001, science, 293, 64 Ratzenböck, S., Großschedl, J. E., Alves, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346901

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae16a4 2025

  42. [42]

    Safronov, V. S. 1960, Annales d’Astrophysique, 23, 979

    1960

  43. [43]

    I., & Sunyaev, R

    Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    1973

  44. [44]

    H., Adams, F

    Shu, F. H., Adams, F. C., & Lizano, S. 1987, IN: Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics. Volume 25 (A88-13240 03-90). Palo Alto, CA, Annual Reviews, Inc., 1987, p. 23-81. NASA-sponsored research., 25, 23

    1987

  45. [45]

    H., Shang, H., & Lee, T

    Shu, F. H., Shang, H., & Lee, T. 1996, Science, 271, 1545

    1996

  46. [46]

    P., Bisbas, T., & Goodwin, S

    Stamatellos, D., Whitworth, A. P., Bisbas, T., & Goodwin, S. 2007, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 475, 37

    2007

  47. [47]

    1964, Astrophysical Journal, vol

    Toomre, A. 1964, Astrophysical Journal, vol. 139, p. 1217-1238 (1964)., 139, 1217

    1964

  48. [48]

    Xu, W., & Armitage, P. J. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 946, 94

    2023

  49. [49]

    1995, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 3413

    Yoneda, S., & Grossman, L. 1995, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 3413

    1995

  50. [50]

    K., Celeste, M., Booth, R

    Young, A. K., Celeste, M., Booth, R. A., et al. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 531, 1746

    2024

  51. [51]

    Zhou, T., Deng, H.-P., Chen, Y.-X., & Lin, D. N. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 940, 117

    2022

  52. [52]

    Zwart, S. P. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A69

    2019

  53. [53]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 616, A85

    Lugaro, M. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 616, A85

    2018