pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21642 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Exploring the statistical anisotropy of primordial curvature perturbations with pulsar timing arrays

Fengting Xie , Zhi-Chao Zhao , Qing-Hua Zhu , Xin Li
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 20:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.CO
keywords primordial anisotropyscalar-induced gravitational wavespulsar timing arraysoverlap reduction functionsNANOGrav 15-yeardipole anisotropystochastic gravitational wavesearly universe
0
0 comments X

The pith

A dipole anisotropy in the primordial curvature power spectrum generates dipolar and quadrupolar patterns in scalar-induced gravitational waves observed by pulsar timing arrays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how statistical anisotropy of dipole type in the early universe's curvature perturbations influences the stochastic background of scalar-induced gravitational waves. It establishes that this anisotropy produces both dipolar and quadrupolar variations in the wave energy density spectrum without creating additional polarization states. From this, frequency-dependent overlap reduction functions are calculated for pulsar timing arrays, showing stronger effects at smaller scales and dependence on the direction and pulsar sky distribution. Application to the NANOGrav 15-year observations reveals no clear preferred direction but sets an upper bound on the amplitude around 0.5. This work points to the value of expanded frequency coverage in upcoming PTA datasets for sharper tests of primordial anisotropy.

Core claim

We demonstrate that the primordial dipole induces both dipolar and quadrupolar anisotropies in the energy density spectrum of scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs), without generating extra polarization modes. Based on this anisotropic spectrum, we derive the corresponding PTA overlap reduction functions (ORFs), which exhibit frequency dependence, with the anisotropies enhanced on small scales. Furthermore, owing to the non-uniform distribution of millisecond pulsars over the sky in current PTA dataset, the ORFs exhibit a morphology that explicitly depends on the preferred direction of the anisotropy. However, our bayesian analysis of the NANOGrav 15-year dataset still yields no sign

What carries the argument

Dipole-type statistical anisotropy in the primordial power spectrum that induces anisotropic energy density in scalar-induced gravitational waves and direction-dependent overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays.

If this is right

  • The overlap reduction functions for PTAs become frequency dependent.
  • Anisotropies are enhanced on small scales in the SIGW spectrum.
  • The specific form of the ORFs depends on the preferred direction of anisotropy and the distribution of pulsars.
  • Broader frequency coverage in future PTA observations will allow tighter constraints on the anisotropy amplitude.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method provides a new probe of early universe directional preferences that could complement cosmic microwave background measurements of statistical anisotropy.
  • If a signal is detected at higher frequencies, it could distinguish between different models of inflation that break isotropy.
  • The current weak limits suggest that combining PTA data with other gravitational wave observatories might be necessary to fully test the phenomenological model.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis relies on a phenomenological dipole parameterization of anisotropy in the primordial power spectrum and assumes that the PTA observational frequencies lie below the SIGW spectral peak where anisotropic contributions are suppressed.

What would settle it

Detection of the predicted frequency-dependent dipolar and quadrupolar anisotropies in future PTA data at frequencies closer to or above the spectral peak, consistent with an amplitude g greater than 0.5, or the absence of any such signal across an extended frequency range would test the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21642 by Fengting Xie, Qing-Hua Zhu, Xin Li, Zhi-Chao Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The scale-weighted function Wn(k) as function of scale k (left panel) and anisotropy magnitude g (right panel). The n = 0, 1, and 2 represent the isotropic part, dipole anisotropic part and quadrupole anisotropic part, respectively. where dimensionless power spectrum is given by P λλ h (k) = (k 3/2π 2 )P λλ h (k), and Peff(k) = k 3 2π 2 X 2 m=0 g mHm(k) , (13) Ω(k, ˆk, d) = X 2 n=0 ( ˆd · ˆk) nWn(k) . (14)… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Effective energy density fraction of SIGWs in the presence of statistical anisotropy of primordial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overlap reduction functions for dipole (left panel) and quadrupole (right panel) anisotropies of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The typical configurations of the pulsar pairs relative to the preferred direction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The deformed Hellings-Downs curves due to the dipolar anisotropy in primordial power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The deformed Hellings-Downs curves with g = 1 on the scale of k/k∗ = 1.5 for selected direction of ˆd. The scatter points represent the ORFs as function of the angular separation of pulsar pairs, which consist of 67 millisecond pulsars used by NANOGrav [130]. ˆd-dependent morphology, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The posterior distributions of our model parameters of SIGWs with the dipole statistical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the posterior distributions of the anisotropic SIGWs and the isotropic SIGWs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The recent detection of a stochastic gravitational wave background by pulsar timing arrays has opened a new window in understanding supermassive black hole binaries and in probing the universe at the early time. Recently, pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations have been further paving the way to probe anisotropies in the stochastic gravitational wave background. This study investigates dipole-type statistical anisotropy in the primordial power spectrum within a phenomenological framework. We demonstrate that the primordial dipole induces both dipolar and quadrupolar anisotropies in the energy density spectrum of scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs), without generating extra polarization modes. Based on this anisotropic spectrum, we derive the corresponding PTA overlap reduction functions (ORFs), which exhibit frequency dependence, with the anisotropies enhanced on small scales. Furthermore, owing to the non-uniform distribution of millisecond pulsars over the sky in current PTA dataset, the ORFs exhibit a morphology that explicitly depends on the preferred direction of the anisotropy. However, our bayesian analysis of the NANOGrav 15-year dataset still yields no significant evidence for a preferred direction and a weak upper limit on anisotropy amplitude $(g\lesssim0.5)$. This result arises because the observational frequency band lies below the spectral peak, where our models predict suppressed anisotropic contributions. This limitation highlights the potential of future PTA observations. Specifically, datasets with broader frequency coverage are expected to tighten constraints on dipole-type anisotropy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents a phenomenological investigation of dipole-type statistical anisotropy in the primordial curvature power spectrum. It demonstrates that this induces both dipolar and quadrupolar anisotropies in the energy density spectrum of scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs) without generating extra polarization modes, derives the corresponding frequency-dependent PTA overlap reduction functions (ORFs) that depend on the preferred direction due to non-uniform pulsar sky distribution, and performs a Bayesian analysis on the NANOGrav 15-year dataset. The analysis finds no significant evidence for a preferred direction and reports a weak upper limit g ≲ 0.5, which the authors attribute to the PTA frequency band lying below the SIGW spectral peak where anisotropic contributions are suppressed. The work highlights the potential for future PTA datasets with broader frequency coverage to improve constraints.

Significance. If the derivations of the anisotropic SIGW spectra and ORFs are correct, this provides a concrete framework for using PTA data to constrain primordial statistical anisotropies, with the frequency dependence and directional morphology of the ORFs offering testable predictions. The application to real NANOGrav data and the explicit discussion of observational limitations represent a strength, though the reported upper limit is conditional on the choice of scalar spectrum parameters.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Bayesian analysis section] Abstract and discussion of Bayesian results: The upper limit g ≲ 0.5 and lack of directional evidence are explicitly attributed to the NANOGrav frequency band lying below the SIGW spectral peak, where the kernel averages directions more isotropically and suppresses anisotropic contributions from the dipole term in P_ζ(k, n̂) = P0(k)[1 + g k̂·n̂]. However, the peak location is set by the free phenomenological parameter k* in the scalar spectrum, which is not independently constrained by the NANOGrav spectrum shape or other observables. Shifting k* so the peak enters the observed band would increase the directional modulation in the frequency-dependent ORFs and alter the posterior on g. The analysis should include robustness checks by varying k* or marginalizing over it to support the interpretation of the limit.
  2. [Section on ORF derivation] Derivation of anisotropic ORFs: The claim that the ORFs exhibit frequency dependence with anisotropies enhanced on small scales is central to the PTA predictions. The manuscript should provide explicit expressions or numerical examples showing how the directional integrals over the anisotropic P_ζ weighted by the SIGW kernel produce the dipolar/quadrupolar terms in Ω_GW(f) and the resulting ORF morphology, particularly for the non-uniform pulsar distribution.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'our models predict suppressed anisotropic contributions' without specifying the exact scalar spectrum form or kernel used; a brief equation or reference in the abstract or introduction would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and agree to strengthen the paper with additional robustness checks and explicit derivations as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Bayesian analysis section] Abstract and discussion of Bayesian results: The upper limit g ≲ 0.5 and lack of directional evidence are explicitly attributed to the NANOGrav frequency band lying below the SIGW spectral peak, where the kernel averages directions more isotropically and suppresses anisotropic contributions from the dipole term in P_ζ(k, n̂) = P0(k)[1 + g k̂·n̂]. However, the peak location is set by the free phenomenological parameter k* in the scalar spectrum, which is not independently constrained by the NANOGrav spectrum shape or other observables. Shifting k* so the peak enters the observed band would increase the directional modulation in the frequency-dependent ORFs and alter the posterior on g. The analysis should include robustness checks by varying k* or marginalizing over it to support the interpretation of the limit.

    Authors: We agree that k* is a free phenomenological parameter whose value is not independently fixed by the NANOGrav data, and that our interpretation of the weak upper limit on g depends on the assumed location of the SIGW peak. To address this, we will add robustness checks in the revised manuscript by repeating the Bayesian analysis for several representative values of k* (both inside and outside the observed band) and by exploring marginalization over k* where computationally feasible. These results will be reported in an updated results section and discussion, with the abstract revised to qualify the interpretation accordingly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on ORF derivation] Derivation of anisotropic ORFs: The claim that the ORFs exhibit frequency dependence with anisotropies enhanced on small scales is central to the PTA predictions. The manuscript should provide explicit expressions or numerical examples showing how the directional integrals over the anisotropic P_ζ weighted by the SIGW kernel produce the dipolar/quadrupolar terms in Ω_GW(f) and the resulting ORF morphology, particularly for the non-uniform pulsar distribution.

    Authors: The manuscript already contains the derivation of the anisotropic Ω_GW(f) via directional integrals of the dipole-modulated P_ζ(k, n̂) against the SIGW kernel, leading to the dipolar and quadrupolar anisotropies that enter the frequency-dependent ORFs. To make this more transparent, we will insert the explicit integral expressions for the anisotropic contributions to Ω_GW(f) and add numerical examples (including plots) that illustrate the frequency dependence, the enhancement of anisotropies at higher frequencies, and the directional morphology induced by the actual NANOGrav pulsar sky distribution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation and data analysis remain independent

full rationale

The paper introduces a phenomenological parameterization of dipole anisotropy in the primordial spectrum, derives the resulting dipolar/quadrupolar anisotropies in the SIGW energy density and the associated frequency-dependent ORFs via standard kernel integrals, and then performs a separate Bayesian analysis on the external NANOGrav 15-year dataset to place an upper limit on the free parameter g. None of these steps reduce to their inputs by construction: the derivation follows from the chosen ansatz without tautology, the ORFs are computed outputs rather than renamed fits, and the reported limit g≲0.5 is the direct posterior result from fitting the data under the explicitly stated assumption that the PTA band lies below the scalar spectrum peak. The assumption itself is flagged by the authors as a limitation rather than smuggled in as a derived result. No self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the central claims. This is a standard model-dependent constraint exercise with no load-bearing reduction to the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a phenomenological parameterization of dipole anisotropy (amplitude g and direction) plus standard cosmological assumptions for scalar-induced gravitational wave generation and PTA response. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • g = ≲0.5
    Amplitude of the dipole anisotropy in the primordial power spectrum, with data-derived upper limit ≲0.5.
  • preferred direction
    Direction of the anisotropy, with no significant evidence found in the data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions for the generation of scalar-induced gravitational waves from primordial curvature perturbations.
    Invoked throughout the phenomenological framework for the SIGW energy density spectrum.
  • domain assumption The stochastic gravitational wave background in the PTA band is dominated by scalar-induced contributions.
    Basis for using the SIGW spectrum to derive anisotropies and ORFs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5553 in / 1604 out tokens · 44426 ms · 2026-05-09T20:54:30.000717+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M., et al

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023), 10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6, arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 2023

  2. [2]

    Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), Astron

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), Astron. Astrophys.678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    D. J. Reardonet al., Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xuet al., Res. Astron. Astrophys.23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Agazie et al

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.952, L37 (2023), arXiv:2306.16220 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Agazieet al., Astrophys

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16222 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.956, L3 (2023), arXiv:2306.16221 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Antoniadis et al

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA), Astron. Astrophys.685, A94 (2024), arXiv:2306.16227 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Agazieet al., Astrophys

    G. Agazieet al., Astrophys. J. Lett.978, L29 (2025), arXiv:2408.10166 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Agazieet al., (2026), arXiv:2601.09481 [astro-ph.HE]

    G. Agazieet al., (2026), arXiv:2601.09481 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    C. M. F. Mingarelli, T. J. W. Lazio, A. Sesana, J. E. Greene, J. A. Ellis, C.-P. Ma, S. Croft, S. Burke- Spolaor, and S. R. Taylor, Nature Astron.1, 886 (2017), arXiv:1708.03491 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Exploring the spectrum of stochastic gravitational-wave anisotropies with pulsar timing arrays,

    G. Sato-Polito and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D109, 123544 (2024), arXiv:2305.05690 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Grimm, M

    N. Grimm, M. Pijnenburg, G. Cusin, and C. Bonvin, JCAP03, 011 (2025), arXiv:2404.05670 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Lemke, A

    A.-M. Lemke, A. Mitridate, and K. A. Gersbach, Phys. Rev. D111, 063068 (2025), arXiv:2407.08705 [astro-ph.HE]. 20

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Q. Yang, X. Guo, Z. Cao, X. Shao, and X. Yuan, Astrophys. J.989, 157 (2025), arXiv:2408.05043 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Olmez, V

    S. Olmez, V. Mandic, and X. Siemens, JCAP07, 009 (2012), arXiv:1106.5555 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2012

  17. [17]

    Kuroyanagi, K

    S. Kuroyanagi, K. Takahashi, N. Yonemaru, and H. Kumamoto, Phys. Rev. D95, 043531 (2017), arXiv:1604.00332 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    A. C. Jenkins and M. Sakellariadou, Phys. Rev. D98, 063509 (2018), arXiv:1802.06046 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Geller, A

    M. Geller, A. Hook, R. Sundrum, and Y. Tsai, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 201303 (2018), arXiv:1803.10780 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Liu, R.-G

    J. Liu, R.-G. Cai, and Z.-K. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 141303 (2021), arXiv:2010.03225 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Y. Li, F. P. Huang, X. Wang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D105, 083527 (2022), arXiv:2112.01409 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Ota, Phys

    A. Ota, Phys. Rev. D101, 103511 (2020), arXiv:2001.00409 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Zhang, J.-Z

    X. Zhang, J.-Z. Zhou, and Z. Chang, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 781 (2022), arXiv:2208.12948 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Chen and A

    C. Chen and A. Ota, Phys. Rev. D106, 063507 (2022), arXiv:2205.07810 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Kuang, J.-Z

    Y.-T. Kuang, J.-Z. Zhou, D. Wu, and Z. Chang, (2023), arXiv:2309.06676 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, and K. Kohri, JCAP10, 056 (2023), arXiv:2305.19950 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Yu and S

    Y.-H. Yu and S. Wang, Phys. Rev. D109, 083501 (2024), arXiv:2310.14606 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Mukherjee, H

    D. Mukherjee, H. V. Ragavendra, and S. K. Sethi, Phys. Rev. D113, 023533 (2026), arXiv:2506.23798 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Luo, Y.-H

    D. Luo, Y.-H. Yu, J.-P. Li, and S. Wang, JCAP04, 085 (2025), arXiv:2501.02965 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, and K. Kohri, (2025), arXiv:2505.16820 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, and K. Kohri, JCAP05, 109 (2024), arXiv:2403.00238 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Vilenkin, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Phys. Lett. B107, 47 (1981)

    1981

  33. [33]

    C. J. Hogan and M. J. Rees, Nature311, 109 (1984)

    1984

  34. [34]

    Vachaspati and A

    T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D31, 3052 (1985)

    1985

  35. [35]

    Gravitational radiation from cosmic (super)strings: Bursts, stochastic background, and observational windows,

    T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D71, 063510 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0410222

    work page arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Phys. Rev. D96, 104046 (2017), arXiv:1709.02693 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Ringeval and T

    C. Ringeval and T. Suyama, JCAP12, 027 (2017), arXiv:1709.03845 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Baeza-Ballesteros, E

    J. Baeza-Ballesteros, E. J. Copeland, D. G. Figueroa, and J. Lizarraga, Phys. Rev. D110, 043522 (2024), arXiv:2308.08456 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    B. Fu, A. Ghoshal, and S. F. King, JHEP11, 071 (2023), arXiv:2306.07334 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Qiu and Z.-H

    Z.-Y. Qiu and Z.-H. Yu, Chin. Phys. C47, 085104 (2023), arXiv:2304.02506 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    M. Li, J. Yu, and Z. Pan, Phys. Rev. D111, 023009 (2025), arXiv:2403.01846 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the delayed scaling scenario,

    Y. Hu and K. Kamada, JCAP04, 044 (2025), arXiv:2501.18380 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    C. J. Hogan, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.218, 629 (1986)

    1986

  44. [44]

    Barni, S

    G. Barni, S. Blasi, E. Madge, and M. Vanvlasselaer, JCAP03, 066 (2026), arXiv:2510.21439 [hep-ph]. 21

    work page arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Chatrchyan, M

    A. Chatrchyan, M. C. D. Marsh, and C. Nikolis, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 041005 (2026), arXiv:2507.01191 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kamionkowski, K. Kasai, and B. Shakya, Phys. Rev. D112, 083523 (2025), arXiv:2412.17912 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    J. Shao, H. Mao, and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D111, 023052 (2025), arXiv:2410.06780 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    C. Tian, X. Wang, and C. Bal´ azs, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1091 (2025), arXiv:2409.14505 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Niemi and T

    L. Niemi and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Phys. Rev. D111, 075034 (2025), arXiv:2408.15912 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Jiang, F.P

    S. Jiang, F. P. Huang, and C. S. Li, Phys. Rev. D108, 063508 (2023), arXiv:2305.02218 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Cai, S.-J

    R.-G. Cai, S.-J. Wang, and Z.-Y. Yuwen, Phys. Rev. D108, L021502 (2023), arXiv:2305.00074 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    J. Liu, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, and S.-J. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 051001 (2023), arXiv:2208.14086 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D75, 123518 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612013

    work page arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Baumann, P.J

    D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi, and K. Ichiki, Phys. Rev. D76, 084019 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0703290

    work page arXiv 2007

  55. [55]

    J. R. Espinosa, D. Racco, and A. Riotto, JCAP09, 012 (2018), arXiv:1804.07732 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Phys. Rev. D97, 123532 (2018), arXiv:1804.08577 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Primordial Black Holes - Perspectives in Gravitational Wave Astronomy -

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 063001 (2018), arXiv:1801.05235 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Dom` enech, Universe7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    G. Dom` enech, Universe7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    A topic review on probing primordial black hole dark matter with scalar induced gravitational waves,

    C. Yuan and Q.-G. Huang, iScience24, 102860 (2021), arXiv:2103.04739 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Induced gravitational wave interpretation of PTA data: a complete study for general equation of state,

    G. Dom` enech, S. Pi, A. Wang, and J. Wang, JCAP08, 054 (2024), arXiv:2402.18965 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Wang, Z.-C

    S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, and Q.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013207 (2024), arXiv:2307.03095 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Z.-C. Chen, J. Li, L. Liu, and Z. Yi, Phys. Rev. D109, L101302 (2024), arXiv:2401.09818 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Z.-C. Chen, C. Yuan, and Q.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 25 (2020), arXiv:1910.12239 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Yuan, Z.-C

    C. Yuan, Z.-C. Chen, and Q.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. D100, 8 (2019), arXiv:1906.11549 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2020

  66. [66]

    Nakama and T

    T. Nakama and T. Suyama, Phys. Rev. D92, 121304 (2015), arXiv:1506.05228 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  67. [67]

    Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023), 10.3847/2041-8213/acdc91, arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdc91 2023

  68. [68]

    Zhu, Z.-C

    Q.-H. Zhu, Z.-C. Zhao, S. Wang, and X. Zhang, Chin. Phys. C48, 125105 (2024), arXiv:2307.13574 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Induced gravitational waves with kination era for recent pulsar timing array signals,

    K. Harigaya, K. Inomata, and T. Terada, Phys. Rev. D108, 123538 (2023), arXiv:2309.00228 [astro- ph.CO]. 22

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    De Luca, A

    V. De Luca, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D108, 063531 (2023), arXiv:2307.13633 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Choudhury, K

    S. Choudhury, K. Dey, A. Karde, S. Panda, and M. Sami, Phys. Lett. B856, 138925 (2024), arXiv:2310.11034 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Wang, X.-H

    X. Wang, X.-H. Ma, and Y.-F. Cai, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34, 2550027 (2025), arXiv:2412.19631 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Choudhury, K

    S. Choudhury, K. Dey, S. Ganguly, A. Karde, S. K. Singh, and P. Tiwari, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 472 (2025), arXiv:2409.18983 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Yu and S

    Y.-H. Yu and S. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 210412 (2025), arXiv:2405.02960 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Suyama and J

    T. Suyama and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D84, 083511 (2011), arXiv:1106.5983 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2011

  76. [76]

    Y.-F. Cai, X. Tong, D.-G. Wang, and S.-F. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 081306 (2018), arXiv:1805.03639 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Y.-F. Cai, C. Chen, X. Tong, D.-G. Wang, and S.-F. Yan, Phys. Rev. D100, 043518 (2019), arXiv:1902.08187 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Cai, Z.-K

    R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, J. Liu, L. Liu, and X.-Y. Yang, JCAP06, 013 (2020), arXiv:1912.10437 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    On the slope of the curvature power spectrum in non-attractor inflation,

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato, JCAP04, 048 (2020), arXiv:1912.01061 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    Y.-F. Cai, J. Jiang, M. Sasaki, V. Vardanyan, and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 251301 (2021), arXiv:2105.12554 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.