pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21701 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Self-phoretic colloids in chiral active fluids

Michalis Chatzittofi , Yuto Hosaka , Andrej Vilfan , Ramin Golestanian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 13:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords self-phoretic colloidschiral active fluidsodd viscosityself-propulsion velocitiesspherical swimmerscollective dynamicssurface activity profiles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Phoretic self-propulsion velocities are derived for spherical colloids in fluids with odd viscosity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the standard theory of how particles move by phoresis to fluids that have odd viscosity, a property arising in chiral active fluids that breaks time-reversal symmetry. It calculates both the forward speed and the rotation rate for a sphere whose surface has arbitrary patterns of chemical activity and mobility. This matters because it allows prediction of motion in environments where classical fluid mechanics fails, such as certain biological or synthetic active fluids. The results cover both symmetric and asymmetric coatings, showing how chirality interacts with the particle's symmetry. These expressions can then be used to model groups of such particles moving together.

Core claim

The authors generalize the theory of phoretic active matter to fluid environments with odd viscosity and derive expressions for translational and rotational self-propulsion velocities in the case of a spherical swimmer with arbitrary activity and mobility surface profiles. They discuss specific examples of chemically active colloids with axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric coatings and the resulting interplay between symmetry and chirality. Our results can be applied to study the emergent collective dynamics of phoretic particles in fluid media with broken time-reversal and parity symmetries.

What carries the argument

Generalized expressions for translational and rotational self-propulsion velocities that incorporate odd viscosity into the flow field around a spherical particle with arbitrary surface activity and mobility profiles.

If this is right

  • Axisymmetric coatings produce propulsion speeds that depend on the strength of odd viscosity in addition to the usual phoretic terms.
  • Non-axisymmetric coatings generate rotational velocities whose direction and magnitude reflect the broken parity of the fluid.
  • The velocity formulas supply the single-particle input needed to simulate collective motion of many phoretic colloids.
  • The framework covers both chemically active and other surface-driven swimmers in fluids with broken time-reversal symmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same linear extension might be testable in microfluidic channels containing rotating particles that generate odd viscosity.
  • Design rules for microswimmers could incorporate these velocity corrections to achieve controlled trajectories in chiral media.
  • Extensions to non-spherical shapes would be a natural next calculation once the spherical case is established.

Load-bearing premise

The classical phoretic mechanism remains valid and extends linearly when odd viscosity is added to the fluid equations.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the actual translational and rotational speeds of a coated spherical colloid placed in a chiral active fluid with known odd viscosity and finds values that do not match the derived expressions for the given surface profiles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21701 by Andrej Vilfan, Michalis Chatzittofi, Ramin Golestanian, Yuto Hosaka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of a self-phoretic Janus particle in a 3D chiral active fluid with even (shear) viscosity view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Two examples of spherical active phoretic colloids with axisymmetric coating (a) Saturn and (b) Janus [ view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) An example of a colloid with non-axisymmetric coating described by Eq. ( view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Autonomous and driven transport in chiral active fluids have been shown to exhibit features that cannot be accommodated within the classical formulation of fluid mechanics, due to the role of odd viscosity. We generalize the theory of phoretic active matter to fluid environments with odd viscosity and derive expressions for translational and rotational self-propulsion velocities in the case of a spherical swimmer with arbitrary activity and mobility surface profiles. We discuss specific examples of chemically active colloids with axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric coatings and the resulting interplay between symmetry and chirality. Our results can be applied to study the emergent collective dynamics of phoretic particles in fluid media with broken time-reversal and parity symmetries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper generalizes the theory of self-phoretic active colloids to chiral active fluids characterized by odd viscosity. It derives closed-form expressions for the translational and rotational self-propulsion velocities of a spherical particle with arbitrary (axisymmetric or non-axisymmetric) surface activity and mobility profiles, obtained by solving the Stokes problem with an added odd-viscosity term in the stress tensor while retaining the classical phoretic slip boundary condition. Specific examples illustrate the interplay between particle symmetry and fluid chirality, with discussion of implications for collective dynamics.

Significance. If the central derivations are valid, the work supplies the first analytical framework for phoretic propulsion in fluids with broken time-reversal symmetry, enabling quantitative predictions for colloidal transport and emergent behavior in chiral active media. The generality of the activity/mobility profiles and the explicit velocity formulas constitute a clear technical advance over prior axisymmetric treatments.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2 and velocity derivation] §2 (hydrodynamic formulation) and the derivation leading to Eqs. (velocity expressions): the boundary condition is stated as the unmodified classical phoretic slip u_slip = M · ∇c (tangential only). Odd viscosity contributes an antisymmetric stress that breaks reciprocity; it is not shown whether this induces additional surface torques, modifies the effective mobility, or requires a revised normal-velocity condition for non-axisymmetric activity. Without an explicit check that the odd-viscosity term integrates to zero against the slip or produces no extra force/torque contributions, the derived velocities may miss load-bearing terms.
  2. [§3] §3 (specific examples): for the non-axisymmetric coating case, the rotational velocity formula is obtained by projecting the slip onto the appropriate spherical harmonics. It is unclear whether the odd-viscosity contribution to the stress tensor alters the orthogonality or the torque balance used to extract the rotation rate; a step-by-step verification that the antisymmetric stress does not couple to the rotational mode would be required to confirm the reported expressions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the odd-viscosity coefficient is introduced without an explicit comparison table to the even viscosity; a short appendix relating the two would improve readability.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 (velocity vs. activity amplitude) lacks error bars or sensitivity analysis with respect to the odd-viscosity parameter; adding a second curve for a small odd-viscosity perturbation would clarify the chiral correction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for providing constructive feedback. We have carefully considered each comment and provide detailed responses below. Revisions have been made to the manuscript to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2 and velocity derivation] §2 (hydrodynamic formulation) and the derivation leading to Eqs. (velocity expressions): the boundary condition is stated as the unmodified classical phoretic slip u_slip = M · ∇c (tangential only). Odd viscosity contributes an antisymmetric stress that breaks reciprocity; it is not shown whether this induces additional surface torques, modifies the effective mobility, or requires a revised normal-velocity condition for non-axisymmetric activity. Without an explicit check that the odd-viscosity term integrates to zero against the slip or produces no extra force/torque contributions, the derived velocities may miss load-bearing terms.

    Authors: The classical phoretic slip boundary condition is derived from the interaction between the solute concentration gradient and the surface mobility, and it remains unchanged in the presence of odd viscosity, which is a property of the bulk fluid. The odd-viscosity contribution to the stress tensor is incorporated into the bulk hydrodynamic equations, but the surface boundary conditions for velocity (tangential slip and zero normal velocity for an impermeable particle) are unaffected. To confirm that no additional force or torque terms arise, we note that the modified Stokes equation with odd viscosity still satisfies the divergence-free condition for the stress in the bulk. Consequently, the surface integral of the odd-viscosity stress contribution to the net force and torque can be shown to be zero by integration by parts or using the properties of the flow field. We have added an explicit verification of this in a new subsection of §2, demonstrating that the derived velocity expressions remain valid without modification to the boundary conditions or additional terms. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (specific examples): for the non-axisymmetric coating case, the rotational velocity formula is obtained by projecting the slip onto the appropriate spherical harmonics. It is unclear whether the odd-viscosity contribution to the stress tensor alters the orthogonality or the torque balance used to extract the rotation rate; a step-by-step verification that the antisymmetric stress does not couple to the rotational mode would be required to confirm the reported expressions.

    Authors: The extraction of the rotational velocity in the non-axisymmetric case relies on the torque-free condition and the orthogonality of the spherical harmonic modes. Although odd viscosity introduces an antisymmetric component to the stress, the solution of the flow field accounts for this in the bulk, and the surface projection remains orthogonal because the rotational mode corresponds to a rigid-body rotation, for which the odd-viscosity stress integrates to zero against the torque balance due to the antisymmetry and the incompressibility. We have included a step-by-step verification in the revised §3, showing explicitly that the coupling term vanishes for the rotational velocity component, thereby confirming the validity of the reported expressions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct linear generalization from modified Stokes equations

full rationale

The paper extends the standard phoretic slip boundary condition u_slip = M · ∇c to a fluid with odd viscosity by adding the antisymmetric odd-viscosity contribution to the stress tensor and solving the resulting linear Stokes problem for a sphere. The translational and rotational velocities are obtained by direct integration over the surface activity and mobility profiles using the known Stokes flow solutions (with the odd term). No parameter is fitted to data and then re-labeled as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to force the result, and the boundary condition is not redefined in terms of the output velocities. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on extending existing phoretic equations to include odd viscosity as a fluid property; no free parameters or new entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The phoretic mechanism can be generalized to fluids with odd viscosity while preserving the form of activity and mobility surface profiles.
    Abstract states the generalization is performed, implying this extension is valid.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5410 in / 1119 out tokens · 44553 ms · 2026-05-08T13:25:10.009479+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    S. Chen, D. E. Fan, P. Fischer, A. Ghosh, K. G¨ opfrich, R. Golestanian, H. Hess, X. Ma, B. J. Nelson, T. Pati˜ no Pa- dial, J. Tang, K. Villa, W. Wang, L. Zhang, A. Sen, and S. S´ anchez, A roadmap for next-generation nanomotors, Nat. Nanotechnol.20, 990 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    X. Ju, C. Chen, C. M. Oral, S. Sevim, R. Golestanian, M. Sun, N. Bouzari, X. Lin, M. Urso, J. S. Nam, Y. Cho, X. Peng, F. C. Landers, S. Yang, A. Adibi, N. Taz, R. Wittkowski, D. Ahmed, W. Wang, V. Magdanz, M. Medina- S´ anchez, M. Guix, N. Bari, B. Behkam, R. Kapral, Y. Huang, J. Tang, B. Wang, K. Morozov, A. Leshansky, S. A. Abbasi, H. Choi, S. Ghosh, B...

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Gompper, R

    G. Gompper, R. G. Winkler, T. Speck, A. Solon, C. Nardini, F. Peruani, H. L¨ owen, R. Golestanian, U. B. Kaupp, L. Alvarez, T. Kiørboe, E. Lauga, W. C. K. Poon, A. DeSimone, S. Mui˜ nos-Landin, A. Fischer, N. A. S¨ oker, F. Cichos, R. Kapral, P. Gaspard, M. Ripoll, F. Sagues, A. Doostmohammadi, J. M. Yeomans, I. S. Aranson, C. Bechinger, H. Stark, C. K. H...

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    J. L. Anderson, Colloid transport by interfacial forces, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.21, 61 (1989)

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    J. L. Moran and J. D. Posner, Phoretic self-propulsion, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.49, 511 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    R. Golestanian, Phoretic Active Matter, inActive Matter and Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 112, September 2018(Oxford University Press, 2022)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    J. R. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, R. Vafabakhsh, and R. Golestanian, Self-motile colloidal particles: From directed propulsion to random walk, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 048102 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Ebbens, D

    S. Ebbens, D. A. Gregory, G. Dunderdale, J. R. Howse, Y. Ibrahim, T. B. Liverpool, and R. Golestanian, Electrokinetic effects in catalytic platinum-insulator Janus swimmers, Europhys. Lett.106, 58003 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Jiang, N

    H.-R. Jiang, N. Yoshinaga, and M. Sano, Active motion of a Janus particle by self-thermophoresis in a defocused laser beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 268302 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Golestanian, Collective behavior of thermally active colloids, Phys

    R. Golestanian, Collective behavior of thermally active colloids, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 038303 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    W. F. Paxton, K. C. Kistler, C. C. Olmeda, A. Sen, S. K. St. Angelo, Y. Cao, T. E. Mallouk, P. E. Lammert, and V. H. Crespi, Catalytic nanomotors: Autonomous movement of striped nanorods, J. Am. Chem. Soc.126, 13424–13431 (2004). 10

    work page 2004

  12. [12]

    Fournier-Bidoz, A

    S. Fournier-Bidoz, A. C. Arsenault, I. Manners, and G. A. Ozin, Synthetic self-propelled nanorotors, Chem. Commun. , 441 (2005)

    work page 2005

  13. [13]

    R¨ uckner and R

    G. R¨ uckner and R. Kapral, Chemically powered nanodimers, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 150603 (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    Golestanian, T

    R. Golestanian, T. B. Liverpool, and A. Ajdari, Designing phoretic micro- and nano-swimmers, New J. Phys.9, 126 (2007)

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    J¨ ulicher and J

    F. J¨ ulicher and J. Prost, Generic theory of colloidal transport, Eur. Phys. J. E29, 27 (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Palacci, S

    J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine, and P. M. Chaikin, Living crystals of light-activated colloidal surfers, Science339, 936–940 (2013)

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Buttinoni, J

    I. Buttinoni, J. Bialk´ e, F. K¨ ummel, H. L¨ owen, C. Bechinger, and T. Speck, Dynamical clustering and phase separation in suspensions of self-propelled colloidal particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 238301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    S. Saha, R. Golestanian, and S. Ramaswamy, Clusters, asters, and collective oscillations in chemotactic colloids, Phys. Rev. E89, 062316 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Brown and W

    A. Brown and W. Poon, Ionic effects in self-propelled Pt-coated Janus swimmers, Soft Matter10, 4016–4027 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    S. J. Ebbens, Active colloids: Progress and challenges towards realising autonomous applications, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.21, 14 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Zhang, E

    J. Zhang, E. Luijten, B. A. Grzybowski, and S. Granick, Active colloids with collective mobility status and research opportunities, Chem. Soc. Rev.46, 5551 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Lisicki, S

    M. Lisicki, S. Y. Reigh, and E. Lauga, Autophoretic motion in three dimensions, Soft Matter14, 3304 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Ebbens, R

    S. Ebbens, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, R. Golestanian, and J. R. Howse, Self-assembled autonomous runners and tumblers, Phys. Rev. E82, 015304(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    K¨ ummel, B

    F. K¨ ummel, B. ten Hagen, R. Wittkowski, I. Buttinoni, R. Eichhorn, G. Volpe, H. L¨ owen, and C. Bechinger, Circular motion of asymmetric self-propelling particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 198302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Soto and R

    R. Soto and R. Golestanian, Self-assembly of catalytically active colloidal molecules: Tailoring activity through surface chemistry, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 068301 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    T˘ atulea-Codrean and E

    M. T˘ atulea-Codrean and E. Lauga, Artificial chemotaxis of phoretic swimmers: instantaneous and long-time behaviour, J. Fluid Mech.856, 921 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    W. E. Uspal, M. N. Popescu, S. Dietrich, and M. Tasinkevych, Self-propulsion of a catalytically active particle near a planar wall: from reflection to sliding and hovering, Soft Matter11, 434–438 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    S. Das, A. Garg, A. I. Campbell, J. Howse, A. Sen, D. Velegol, R. Golestanian, and S. J. Ebbens, Boundaries can steer active Janus spheres, Nat. Commun.6, 8999 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    W. E. Uspal, M. N. Popescu, S. Dietrich, and M. Tasinkevych, Guiding catalytically active particles with chemically patterned surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 048002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Mozaffari, N

    A. Mozaffari, N. Sharifi-Mood, J. Koplik, and C. Maldarelli, Self-diffusiophoretic colloidal propulsion near a solid boundary, Phys. Fluids28, 053107 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Ibrahim and T

    Y. Ibrahim and T. B. Liverpool, How walls affect the dynamics of self-phoretic microswimmers, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 225, 1843 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Yariv, Boundary-induced autophoresis of isotropic colloids: anomalous repulsion in the lubrication limit, J

    E. Yariv, Boundary-induced autophoresis of isotropic colloids: anomalous repulsion in the lubrication limit, J. Fluid Mech. 812, 26 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    S. Y. Reigh, P. Chuphal, S. Thakur, and R. Kapral, Diffusiophoretically induced interactions between chemically active and inert particles, Soft Matter14, 6043 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Daddi-Moussa-Ider, A

    A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, A. Vilfan, and R. Golestanian, Diffusiophoretic propulsion of an isotropic active colloidal particle near a finite-sized disk embedded in a planar fluid–fluid interface, J. Fluid Mech.940, A12 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    A. R. Premlata and H.-H. Wei, Coupled Faxen relations for non-uniform slip Janus spheres, Phys. Fluids33, 112003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Ibrahim, R

    Y. Ibrahim, R. Golestanian, and T. B. Liverpool, Shape dependent phoretic propulsion of slender active particles, Phys. Rev. Fluids3, 033101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Poehnl, M

    R. Poehnl, M. N. Popescu, and W. E. Uspal, Axisymmetric spheroidal squirmers and self-diffusiophoretic particles, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter32, 164001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    M. N. Popescu, M. Tasinkevych, and S. Dietrich, Pulling and pushing a cargo with a catalytically active carrier, Europhys. Lett.95, 28004 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Michelin and E

    S. Michelin and E. Lauga, Autophoretic locomotion from geometric asymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. E38, 7 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Michelin, E

    S. Michelin, E. Lauga, and D. Bartolo, Spontaneous autophoretic motion of isotropic particles, Phys. Fluids25, 061701 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Hu, T.-S

    W.-F. Hu, T.-S. Lin, S. Rafai, and C. Misbah, Spontaneous locomotion of phoretic particles in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Fluids7, 034003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Brand˜ ao and E

    R. Brand˜ ao and E. Yariv, Spontaneous autophoretic motion of isotropic disks, J. Fluid Mech.972, R3 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Wittmann, M

    M. Wittmann, M. De Corato, S. Singh, Y. Vaynzof, R. Golestanian, I. Pagonabarraga, and J. Simmchen, Spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking enables anti-rolling motion of MnO2 microrods, ChemRxiv 10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-1p8tq (2025)

    work page doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-1p8tq 2025

  44. [44]

    J. E. Avron, Odd Viscosity, J. Stat. Phys.92, 543 (1998)

    work page 1998

  45. [45]

    Hosaka and S

    Y. Hosaka and S. Komura, Nonequilibrium transport induced by biological nanomachines, Biophys. Rev. Lett.17, 51 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Fruchart, C

    M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, and V. Vitelli, Odd Viscosity and Odd Elasticity, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14, 471 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Khain, C

    T. Khain, C. Scheibner, M. Fruchart, and V. Vitelli, Stokes flows in three-dimensional fluids with odd and parity-violating viscosities, J. Fluid Mech.934, A23 (2022). 11

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Lier, Odd viscous flow past a sphere at low but non-zero Reynolds numbers, J

    R. Lier, Odd viscous flow past a sphere at low but non-zero Reynolds numbers, J. Fluid Mech.998, A40 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Hosaka, S

    Y. Hosaka, S. Komura, and D. Andelman, Hydrodynamic lift of a two-dimensional liquid domain with odd viscosity, Phys. Rev. E104, 064613 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Hosaka, S

    Y. Hosaka, S. Komura, and D. Andelman, Nonreciprocal response of a two-dimensional fluid with odd viscosity, Phys. Rev. E103, 042610 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Yuan and M

    H. Yuan and M. Olvera de la Cruz, Stokesian dynamics with odd viscosity, Phys. Rev. Fluids8, 054101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    J. C. Everts and B. Cichocki, Dissipative effects in odd viscous Stokes flow around a single sphere, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 218303 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Hosaka, R

    Y. Hosaka, R. Golestanian, and A. Vilfan, Lorentz reciprocal theorem in fluids with odd viscosity, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 178303 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Hosaka, M

    Y. Hosaka, M. Chatzittofi, R. Golestanian, and A. Vilfan, Chirotactic response of microswimmers in fluids with odd viscosity, Phys. Rev. Research6, L032044 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Chatzittofi and Y

    M. Chatzittofi and Y. Hosaka, Dumbbell dimer dynamics in three-dimensional chiral fluids, Phys. Rev. E112, 055416 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Hosaka, D

    Y. Hosaka, D. Andelman, and S. Komura, Pair dynamics of active force dipoles in an odd-viscous fluid, Eur. Phys. J. E 46, 18 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Hosaka, R

    Y. Hosaka, R. Golestanian, and A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, Hydrodynamics of an odd active surfer in a chiral fluid, New J. Phys.25, 083046 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    M. F. Lapa and T. L. Hughes, Swimming at low Reynolds number in fluids with odd, or Hall, viscosity, Phys. Rev. E89, 043019 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    Markovich and T

    T. Markovich and T. C. Lubensky, Odd viscosity in active matter: Microscopic origin and 3D effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 048001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Khain, M

    T. Khain, M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, T. A. Witten, and V. Vitelli, Trading particle shape with fluid symmetry: on the mobility matrix in 3-D chiral fluids, J. Fluid Mech.992, A5 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Masoud and H

    H. Masoud and H. A. Stone, The reciprocal theorem in fluid dynamics and transport phenomena, J. Fluid Mech.879, P1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    H. A. Stone and A. D. T. Samuel, Propulsion of microorganisms by surface distortions, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4102 (1996)

    work page 1996

  63. [63]

    Lauga and S

    E. Lauga and S. Michelin, Stresslets induced by active swimmers, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 148001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Nasouri and G

    B. Nasouri and G. J. Elfring, Higher-order force moments of active particles, Phys. Rev. Fluids3, 044101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    Lauga,The fluid dynamics of cell motility(Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    E. Lauga,The fluid dynamics of cell motility(Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Katsamba, M

    P. Katsamba, M. D. Butler, L. Koens, and T. D. Montenegro-Johnson, Chemically active filaments: analysis and extensions of slender phoretic theory, Soft Matter18, 7051 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Q. Yang, H. Zhu, P. Liu, R. Liu, Q. Shi, K. Chen, N. Zheng, F. Ye, and M. Yang, Topologically protected transport of cargo in a chiral active fluid aided by odd-viscosity-enhanced depletion interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 198001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    V. Soni, E. S. Bililign, S. Magkiriadou, S. Sacanna, D. Bartolo, M. J. Shelley, and W. T. M. Irvine, The odd free surface flows of a colloidal chiral fluid, Nat. Phys.15, 1188 (2019)

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    M. A. L´ opez-Casta˜ no, A. M´ arquez Seco, A. M´ arquez Seco,´A. Rodr´ ıguez-Rivas, and F. V. Reyes, Chirality transitions in a system of active flat spinners, Phys. Rev. Research4, 033230 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    Mecke, Y

    J. Mecke, Y. Gao, C. A. Ram´ ırez Medina, D. G. Aarts, G. Gompper, and M. Ripoll, Simultaneous emergence of active turbulence and odd viscosity in a colloidal chiral active system, Commun. Phys.6, 324 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    P. Chen, S. Weady, S. Atis, T. Matsuzawa, M. J. Shelley, and W. T. Irvine, Self-propulsion, flocking and chiral active phases from particles spinning at intermediate Reynolds numbers, Nat. Phys.21, 146 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Ibrahim, R

    Y. Ibrahim, R. Golestanian, and T. B. Liverpool, Multiple phoretic mechanisms in the self-propulsion of a Pt-insulator Janus swimmer, J. Fluid Mech.828, 318 (2017)

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    Linear odd electrophoresis of a sphere in a charged chiral active fluid

    R. van Buel, B. Cichocki, and J. C. Everts, Linear odd electrophoresis of a sphere in a charged chiral active fluid (2026), arXiv:2604.07510

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    J. A. Cohen and R. Golestanian, Emergent cometlike swarming of optically driven thermally active colloids, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 068302 (2014)

    work page 2014

  75. [75]

    Michelin and E

    S. Michelin and E. Lauga, Geometric tuning of self-propulsion for Janus catalytic particles, Sci. Rep.7, 42264 (2017)

    work page 2017

  76. [76]

    M. C. Fair and J. L. Anderson, Electrophoresis of nonuniformly charged ellipsoidal particles, J. Colloid Interface Sci.127, 388 (1989)

    work page 1989

  77. [77]

    Solomentsev and J

    Y. Solomentsev and J. L. Anderson, Electrophoresis of slender particles, J. Fluid Mech.279, 197 (1994)

    work page 1994

  78. [78]

    Tucci, R

    G. Tucci, R. Golestanian, and S. Saha, Nonreciprocal collective dynamics in a mixture of phoretic Janus colloids, New J. Phys.26, 073006 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    Zhou and J

    T. Zhou and J. F. Brady, Hydrodynamic interactions destroy motility-induced phase separation in active suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 088301 (2026)

    work page 2026