pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21902 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

A Universal Quantum Information Preserving Photonic Switch for Scalable Quantum Networks

Jiapeng Zhao , St\'ephane Vinet , Amir Minoofar , Michael Kilzer , Lucas Wang , Galan Moody , Vijoy Pandey , Ramana Kompella
show 1 more author
Reza Nejabati
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords quantum switchphotonic entanglementlithium niobatequantum networksentanglement distributionelectro-optic modulationdecoherencereconfigurable networks
0
0 comments X

The pith

A photonic switch in thin-film lithium niobate routes arbitrary entangled quantum states with at most 4 percent decoherence at speeds up to 1 GHz.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to build a device that routes fragile quantum entanglement between nodes on demand without destroying the quantum correlations. Current quantum networks stay stuck in fixed point-to-point links because no practical switch exists that can redirect entangled photons while keeping decoherence low. The authors show that thermo-optic and electro-optic control in lithium niobate achieves this routing, preserves entanglement fidelity, and also converts between different quantum information encodings. If the performance holds when the switches are chained together, networks could move from static pairs to reconfigurable many-node fabrics at megahertz rates.

Core claim

The Universal Quantum Switch performs on-demand, non-blocking, encoding-agnostic routing of quantum information together with seamless modality conversion between disparate platforms. A thin-film lithium niobate prototype demonstrates robust switching with ≤4% decoherence using thermo-optic modulation, high-speed electro-optic switching of arbitrary entangled states at 1 MHz, and reconfiguration speeds up to 1 GHz, representing the first demonstration of multi-node dynamic entanglement distribution at these speeds. The architecture exhibits dimension-independent decoherence and is projected to scale as an interoperable building block for heterogeneous quantum network fabrics.

What carries the argument

The Universal Quantum Switch, a thin-film lithium niobate device that combines thermo-optic modulation for stable routing with electro-optic switching for high-speed operation to redirect entangled photons while limiting added decoherence.

If this is right

  • Quantum networks can be reconfigured on demand instead of remaining limited to fixed point-to-point links.
  • Arbitrary entangled states can be routed at megahertz rates with decoherence held to 4 percent or less.
  • The same device supports conversion between different quantum information modalities, enabling heterogeneous platforms to interoperate.
  • Reconfiguration speeds up to 1 GHz become feasible without scaling decoherence with system dimension.
  • The switch serves as a scalable building block for larger multi-node quantum fabrics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If fiber-coupling losses and synchronization overhead remain modest, the architecture could reduce the hardware overhead for building quantum internet backbones.
  • Dimension-independent decoherence suggests the approach may extend naturally to higher-dimensional encodings or larger port counts without new error sources.
  • Integration with existing telecom infrastructure becomes more plausible once modality conversion is shown between photonic and other qubit types in a single network.

Load-bearing premise

The low decoherence and high-speed performance measured in a single device will survive when multiple switches are connected through fibers and synchronized in a larger network without introducing new loss or timing errors.

What would settle it

Connect three or more switches into a small network, distribute entangled pairs across different paths at 1 MHz, and measure whether the observed entanglement fidelity drops below the single-device value or whether the reconfiguration rate falls below 1 GHz.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21902 by Amir Minoofar, Galan Moody, Jiapeng Zhao, Lucas Wang, Michael Kilzer, Ramana Kompella, Reza Nejabati, St\'ephane Vinet, Vijoy Pandey.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum networks are a keystone of the quantum internet. However, existing implementations remain largely confined to static point-to-point links due to the absence of a switching paradigm capable of dynamically routing fragile quantum entanglement without introducing decoherence. Here, we propose the Universal Quantum Switch, a foundational building block allowing on-demand, non-blocking, and encoding-agnostic routing of quantum information, as well as seamless modality conversion between disparate quantum platforms. We develop a prototype in thin-film lithium niobate and experimentally demonstrate robust switching with $\le 4\%$ decoherence via thermo-optic modulation and high-speed electro-optic switching of arbitrary entangled states at 1 MHz. Moreover, we show that our platform can support reconfiguration speeds up to 1 GHz. To our knowledge, this work represents the first demonstration of multi-node dynamic entanglement distribution at these speeds. Complementing these experimental results, we project the architecture's scalability, showing dimension-independent decoherence, and provide a scalable, interoperable building block for heterogeneous quantum network fabrics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Universal Quantum Switch as a building block for dynamic, non-blocking routing of quantum entanglement and modality conversion across platforms. It reports an experimental prototype in thin-film lithium niobate demonstrating ≤4% decoherence via combined thermo-optic and electro-optic modulation, high-speed switching of arbitrary entangled states at 1 MHz, projections to 1 GHz reconfiguration, dimension-independent decoherence, and claims the first demonstration of multi-node dynamic entanglement distribution at these speeds, with scalability projections for heterogeneous quantum networks.

Significance. If the reported low-decoherence performance and switching metrics hold under full experimental scrutiny and the multi-node routing functionality is directly shown rather than extrapolated, the work would provide a valuable interoperable component for scalable quantum networks, addressing a key gap in moving beyond static point-to-point links.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The headline claim that 'this work represents the first demonstration of multi-node dynamic entanglement distribution at these speeds' is not supported by the experimental description, which centers on characterization of a single photonic switch; multi-node routing, fiber coupling losses, synchronization, and port scaling are treated only as scalability projections rather than experimentally demonstrated results.
  2. [Experimental Results] Experimental section: Concrete metrics (≤4% decoherence, 1 MHz operation) are stated without data tables, error bars, detailed measurement protocols, or raw datasets, preventing independent assessment of the robustness of the thermo-optic and electro-optic switching performance on entangled states.
  3. [Scalability Projections] Scalability section: The assertions of dimension-independent decoherence and support for reconfiguration speeds up to 1 GHz lack supporting derivations, simulations, or multi-port experimental validation, leaving the translation from single-device prototype to multi-node networks unverified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and legends should explicitly indicate whether measurements involve single-photon or entangled-state inputs and include statistical details for the reported decoherence values.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the modulation parameters (thermo-optic vs. electro-optic) and the definition of 'arbitrary entangled states' could be standardized and cross-referenced to avoid ambiguity in the methods description.
  3. [References] A few recent references on thin-film lithium niobate photonic quantum devices appear to be missing from the bibliography.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline claim that 'this work represents the first demonstration of multi-node dynamic entanglement distribution at these speeds' is not supported by the experimental description, which centers on characterization of a single photonic switch; multi-node routing, fiber coupling losses, synchronization, and port scaling are treated only as scalability projections rather than experimentally demonstrated results.

    Authors: We agree that the experimental demonstration is limited to the characterization and operation of a single photonic switch device, while multi-node routing functionality is presented through scalability projections rather than direct experimental realization. The original abstract phrasing was imprecise and could be misread as claiming an experimental multi-node demonstration. We have revised the abstract to explicitly state that the work provides an experimental demonstration of low-decoherence switching of arbitrary entangled states at 1 MHz with projections for multi-node dynamic entanglement distribution, removing the unsupported headline claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental Results] Experimental section: Concrete metrics (≤4% decoherence, 1 MHz operation) are stated without data tables, error bars, detailed measurement protocols, or raw datasets, preventing independent assessment of the robustness of the thermo-optic and electro-optic switching performance on entangled states.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original experimental section lacked sufficient detail for full independent verification. In the revised manuscript, we have added summary tables of measured decoherence values including standard deviations and error bars from repeated measurements, expanded the methods section with step-by-step protocols for state preparation, switching, and quantum state tomography, and provided a link to a public repository containing the raw experimental datasets. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Scalability Projections] Scalability section: The assertions of dimension-independent decoherence and support for reconfiguration speeds up to 1 GHz lack supporting derivations, simulations, or multi-port experimental validation, leaving the translation from single-device prototype to multi-node networks unverified.

    Authors: The dimension-independent decoherence is a direct consequence of the unitary electro-optic and thermo-optic transformations applied to the photonic modes, which preserve entanglement fidelity irrespective of Hilbert-space dimension; we have added a concise derivation in the main text and supporting simulations in the supplementary information. The 1 GHz projection is based on measured electro-optic bandwidth data and device simulations, which we have now included explicitly. Full multi-port experimental validation remains a projection at this stage, as the current work focuses on the single-device prototype; we have clarified this distinction in the revised scalability section and added a discussion of the engineering steps required for multi-port scaling. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental prototype reports direct measurements without reducing claims to fitted inputs or self-citation chains

full rationale

The paper is an experimental demonstration of a thin-film lithium niobate photonic switch, reporting measured decoherence ≤4% under thermo-optic and electro-optic modulation at 1 MHz, with projections for 1 GHz reconfiguration and dimension-independent scaling. No equations, derivations, or first-principles results are presented that reduce performance metrics to parameters fitted from the same data or to self-citations. The multi-node entanglement distribution claim is explicitly framed as a projection rather than a derivation, and the work remains self-contained against external benchmarks of switch characterization. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The device relies on standard thermo-optic and electro-optic effects in lithium niobate without introducing new physical entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5505 in / 1094 out tokens · 97741 ms · 2026-05-09T21:49:54.278711+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The corresponding Jones matrix is:J both = JlossJleakJM ZI(ϕ)JleakJloss

    Both logical|0⟩and|1⟩succeed:P 1 =p 2 s. The corresponding Jones matrix is:J both = JlossJleakJM ZI(ϕ)JleakJloss

    work page

  2. [2]

    The corresponding Jones matrix is:J 0 = JlossJ0,leakJ0,M ZIJ0,leakJloss

    Logical|0⟩only:P 2 =p s(1−p s). The corresponding Jones matrix is:J 0 = JlossJ0,leakJ0,M ZIJ0,leakJloss

    work page

  3. [3]

    The corresponding Jones matrix is:J 1 = JlossJ1,leakJ1,M ZI(ϕ)J1,leakJloss

    Logical|0⟩only:P 3 =p s(1−p s). The corresponding Jones matrix is:J 1 = JlossJ1,leakJ1,M ZI(ϕ)J1,leakJloss. 10 The final density matrixρ out is calculated via a Monte Carlo simulation overMiterations: ρout = 1 M MX j=1 [P1ρboth(ϕj) +P 2ρ0 +P 3ρ1] (4.5) whereρ k = (Jk ⊗I)ρ in(Jk ⊗I) †. Here, we assume that theER≪1 and the photon flux for each input port ha...

    work page

  4. [4]

    J. I. Cirac, A. K. Ekert, S. F. Huelga, and C. Mac- chiavello, Distributed quantum computation over noisy channels, Phys. Rev. A59, 4249 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Aghaee Rad, T

    H. Aghaee Rad, T. Ainsworth, R. N. Alexander, B. Al- tieri, M. F. Askarani, R. Baby, L. Banchi, B. Q. Bara- giola, J. E. Bourassa, R. Chadwick,et al., Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer, Na- ture638, 912 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    D. Main, P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, and D. M. Lucas, Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link, Nature638, 383 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    K´ om´ ar, E

    P. K´ om´ ar, E. M. Kessler, M. Bishof, L. Jiang, A. S. Sørensen, J. Ye, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum network of clocks, Nature Physics10, 582 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Gottesman, T

    D. Gottesman, T. Jennewein, and S. Croke, Longer- baseline telescopes using quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 070503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    A. Zang, A. Kolar, A. Gonzales, J. Chung, S. K. Gray, R. Kettimuthu, T. Zhong, and Z. H. Saleem, Quantum advantage in distributed sensing with noisy quantum net- works, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17089 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    D.-H. Kim, S. Hong, Y.-S. Kim, Y. Kim, S.-W. Lee, R. C. Pooser, K. Oh, S.-Y. Lee, C. Lee, and H.-T. Lim, Dis- tributed quantum sensing of multiple phases with fewer photons, Nature communications15, 266 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptogra- phy: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Theo- retical Computer Science560, 7 (2014), theoretical As- pects of Quantum Cryptography : celebrating 30 years of BB84

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Wengerowsky, S

    S. Wengerowsky, S. Joshi, F. Steinlechner, H. H¨ ubel, and R. Ursin, An entanglement-based wavelength- multiplexed quantum communication network, Nature 564, 225 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Joshi, D

    S. Joshi, D. Aktas, S. Wengerowsky, M. Lonˇ cari´ c, S. Neumann, B. Liu, T. Scheidl, G. Lorenzo, Samec, L. Kling, A. Qiu, M. Razavi, M. Stipˇ cevi´ c, J. Rarity, and R. Ursin, A trusted node-free eight-user metropoli- tan quantum communication network, Science Advances 6, 0959 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Y.-A. Chen, Q. Zhang, T.-Y. Chen, W.-Q. Cai, S.-K. Liao, J. Zhang, K. Chen, J. Yin, J.-G. Ren, Z. Chen, S.-L. Han, Q. Yu, K. Liang, F. Zhou, X. Yuan, M.-S. Zhao, T.-Y. Wang, X. Jiang, L. Zhang, W.-Y. Liu, Y. Li, Q. Shen, Y. Cao, C.-Y. Lu, R. Shu, J.-Y. Wang, L. Li, N.- L. Liu, F. Xu, X.-B. Wang, C.-Z. Peng, and J.-W. Pan, An integrated space-to-ground qua...

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Van Leent, M

    T. Van Leent, M. Bock, F. Fertig, R. Garthoff, S. Eppelt, Y. Zhou, P. Malik, M. Seubert, T. Bauer, W. Rosenfeld, et al., Entangling single atoms over 33 km telecom fibre, Nature607, 69 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Y. Zhou, P. Malik, F. Fertig, M. Bock, T. Bauer, T. van Leent, W. Zhang, C. Becher, and H. Weinfurter, Long- lived quantum memory enabling atom-photon entangle- ment over 101 km of telecom fiber, PRX Quantum5, 020307 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    A. N. Craddock, T. Cowan, N. Bigagli, S. Yekasiri, D. Robinson, G. B. Portmann, A. Verma, Z. Guo, M. Kilzer, J. Zhao, M. Flament, J. Shabani, R. Nejabati, and M. Namazi, High-rate scalable entanglement swap- ping between remote entanglement sources on deployed new york city fibers (2026), arXiv:2602.15653 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Zhang, R

    Y. Zhang, R. Broberg, A. Zhu, G. Li, L. Ge, J. M. Smith, and L. Feng, Classical-decisive quantum inter- net by integrated photonics, Science389, 940 (2025), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adx6176

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adx6176 2025

  19. [19]

    Alshowkan, B

    M. Alshowkan, B. P. Williams, P. G. Evans, N. S. Rao, E. M. Simmerman, H.-H. Lu, N. B. Lingaraju, A. M. Weiner, C. E. Marvinney, Y.-Y. Pai, B. J. Lawrie, N. A. Peters, and J. M. Lukens, Reconfigurable quantum lo- cal area network over deployed fiber, PRX Quantum2, 040304 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Vinet, R

    S. Vinet, R. Tannous, and T. Jennewein, A reconfigurable entanglement distribution network suitable for connect- ing multiple ground nodes with a satellite, EPJ Quantum Technology12, 8 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Vinet, D

    S. Vinet, D. England, C.-Q. Xu, and T. Jennewein, Demonstration of a reconfigurable quantum network ar- chitecture suitable for ground-to-space communication, Optica Quantum4, 14 (2026)

    work page 2026

  22. [22]

    Appas, F

    F. Appas, F. Baboux, M. I. Amanti, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, F. Boitier, E. Diamanti, and S. Ducci, Flexible entanglement-distribution network with an AlGaAs chip for secure communications, npj Quantum Information7, 118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    J. Zhao, Y. Xu, X. Lu, E. Kaur, M. Kilzer, R. Kompella, R. W. Boyd, and R. Nejabati, Scalable low-latency entan- glement distribution for distributed quantum computing, Optica Quantum3, 606 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    M. A. Hall, J. B. Altepeter, and P. Kumar, Ultrafast switching of photonic entanglement, Physical review let- ters106, 053901 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    P. Wang, S. Baek, M. Yabuno, S. Miki, H. Terai, and F. Kaneda, Low-loss polarization-maintaining router for single and entangled photons at a telecom wavelength, Advanced Quantum Technologies8, e00355 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Bornadel, S

    M. Bornadel, S. Vinet, J. Zhao, A. Minoonfar, M. Kilzer, R. Kompella, and R. Nejabati, Towards a quantum 11 switch preserving polarization entanglement, inQuan- tum Computing, Communication, and Simulation VI, Vol. 13919, edited by P. R. Hemmer, A. L. Migdall, and I. A. Burenkov, International Society for Optics and Pho- tonics (SPIE, 2026) p. 139190F

    work page 2026

  27. [27]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Kurizki, P

    G. Kurizki, P. Bertet, Y. Kubo, K. Mølmer, D. Pet- rosyan, P. Rabl, and J. Schmiedmayer, Quantum technologies with hybrid systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 3866 (2015), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1419326112

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1419326112 2015

  29. [29]

    Nehra, R

    V. Nehra, R. J. Birrittella, C. C. Tison, B. K. Malia, Z. S. Smith, D. Heberle, N. J. Barton, A. M. Smith, A. Brownell, M. L. Fanto,et al., Photonic qubit encoding interconversion for heterogeneous quantum networking, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.02081 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Quantum data center infrastructures: A scalable ar- chitectural design perspective,

    H. Shapourian, E. Kaur, T. Sewell, J. Zhao, M. Kilzer, R. Kompella, and R. Nejabati, Quantum data center in- frastructures: A scalable architectural design perspective (2025), arXiv:2501.05598 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    The architecture described herein is subject to a pending patent application from Cisco Systems, Inc

    work page

  32. [32]

    X. Ren, Z. Jin, X. Zou, X. Zhang, X. Feng, F. Liu, K. Cui, Y. Huang, and W. Zhang, On-chip time-bin to path qubit encoding converter via thin film lithium niobate photon- ics chip, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16350 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Banic, J

    M. Banic, J. Sipe, and M. Liscidini, Integrated photonic sources of frequency-bin-encoded multipartite entangled states, Physical Review A109, 013505 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    L. J. Wright, M. Karpi´ nski, C. S¨ oller, and B. J. Smith, Spectral shearing of quantum light pulses by electro-optic phase modulation, Physical review letters118, 023601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    D. Zhu, C. Chen, M. Yu, L. Shao, Y. Hu, C. Xin, M. Yeh, S. Ghosh, L. He, C. Reimer,et al., Spectral control of nonclassical light pulses using an integrated thin-film lithium niobate modulator, Light: Science & Applica- tions11, 327 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Singh, Q

    A. Singh, Q. Li, S. Liu, Y. Yu, X. Lu, C. Schneider, S. H¨ ofling, J. Lawall, V. Verma, R. Mirin,et al., Quan- tum frequency conversion of a quantum dot single-photon source on a nanophotonic chip, Optica6, 563 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Lo and H

    H.-P. Lo and H. Takesue, Precise tuning of single-photon frequency using an optical single sideband modulator, Optica4, 919 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum com- puting, Nature641, 876 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Suzuki, R

    K. Suzuki, R. Konoike, N. Yokoyama, M. Seki, M. Oht- suka, S. Saitoh, S. Suda, H. Matsuura, K. Yamada, S. Namiki,et al., Nonduplicate polarization-diversity 32×32 silicon photonics switch based on a sin/si double- layer platform, Journal of Lightwave Technology38, 226 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    S. Zhao, J. Chen, D. Dai, and Y. Shi, Polarization- insensitive silicon optic switch based on mode manipu- lated power splitters and phase shifters, APL Photonics 8(2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    X. Sun, J. Feng, L. Zhong, H. Lu, W. Han, F. Zhang, R. Akimoto, and H. Zeng, Silicon nitride based polarization-independent 4×4 optical matrix switch, Op- tics & Laser Technology119, 105641 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Bartolucci, P

    S. Bartolucci, P. Birchall, D. Bonneau, H. Ca- ble, M. Gimeno-Segovia, K. Kieling, N. Nickerson, T. Rudolph, and C. Sparrow, Switch networks for pho- tonic fusion-based quantum computing, arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.13760 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Hyperlight Corporation, Private communication (2026), technical specifications regarding TFLN waveguide de- sign, loss and polarization extinction ratios

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    L. Song, J. Zhao, X. Dai, M. Lu, Q. Lu, and W. Guo, Fully adiabatic polarization rotator-splitter based on thin-film lithium niobate platform, Optics Express31, 19604 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    M. Wang, H. Yao, J. Deng, Z. Hu, T. Tang, and K. Chen, Polarization splitter-rotator on thin film lithium niobate based on multimode interference, Optics Express32, 28175 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    F. Zhao, A. Cui, W. Ma, H. Wang, Y. Gao, C. Guo, K. Chen, and L. Liu, Polarization rotator and switch on thin-film lithium niobate, Photonics Research14, 1197 (2026)

    work page 2026

  47. [47]

    M. Wang, J. Li, H. Yao, X. Li, J. Wu, K. S. Chiang, and K. Chen, Thin-film lithium-niobate modulator with a combined passive bias and thermo-optic bias, Opt. Ex- press30, 39706 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Q. Li, Q. Yi, A. Sun, C. Shang, Y. Dai, S. Xing, J. Cui, Y. Zhu, J. Li, J. Zheng, J. Zhang, N. Chi, A. Pan, C. Zeng, J. Xia, S. Zheng, L. Shen, and M. Zhang, Ultra- broadband near- to mid-infrared electro-optic modulator on thin-film lithium niobate, Nature Communications17, 1138 (2026)

    work page 2026

  49. [49]

    Assumpcao, D

    D. Assumpcao, D. Renaud, A. Baradari, B. Zeng, C. De- Eknamkul, C. J. Xin, A. Shams-Ansari, D. Barton, B. Machielse, and M. Loncar, A thin film lithium niobate near-infrared platform for multiplexing quantum nodes, Nature Communications15, 10459 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    T. J. Steiner, J. E. Castro, L. Chang, Q. Dang, W. Xie, J. Norman, J. E. Bowers, and G. Moody, Ultrabright entangled-photon-pair generation from an AlGaAs-on- insulator microring resonator, PRX Quantum2, 010337 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    X. Chen, J. Lin, and K. Wang, A review of silicon-based integrated optical switches, Laser & Photonics Reviews 17, 2200571 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    X. Zhu, Y. Hu, S. Lu, H. K. Warner, X. Li, Y. Song, L. Magalh˜ aes, A. Shams-Ansari, A. Cordaro, N. Sinclair, et al., Twenty-nine million intrinsic q-factor monolithic microresonators on thin-film lithium niobate, Photonics Research12, A63 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    C. Li, J. Guan, J. Lin, R. Gao, M. Wang, L. Qiao, L. Deng, and Y. Cheng, Ultra-high q lithium niobate microring monolithically fabricated by photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching, Optics Express31, 31556 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Wintersperger, F

    K. Wintersperger, F. Dommert, T. Ehmer, A. Hour- sanov, J. Klepsch, W. Mauerer, G. Reuber, T. Strohm, M. Yin, and S. Luber, Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective, EPJ Quantum Technology10, 32 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    S. A. Moses, C. H. Baldwin, M. S. Allman, R. Ancona, L. Ascarrunz, C. Barnes, J. Bartolotta, B. Bjork, P. Blan- chard, M. Bohn,et al., A race-track trapped-ion quantum processor, Physical Review X13, 041052 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Kjaergaard, M

    M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braum¨ uller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Superconducting qubits: Current state of play, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 369 12 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Valdez, V

    F. Valdez, V. Mere, and S. Mookherjea, 100 ghz band- width, 1 volt integrated electro-optic mach–zehnder mod- ulator at near-ir wavelengths, Optica10, 578 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Psaila, S

    N. Psaila, S. Nekkanty, D. Shia, and P. Tadayon, Detach- able optical chiplet connector for co-packaged photonics, Journal of Lightwave Technology41, 6315 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    X. Wang, X. Jiao, B. Wang, Y. Liu, X.-P. Xie, M.-Y. Zheng, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, Quantum frequency conversion and single-photon detection with lithium nio- bate nanophotonic chips, npj Quantum Information9, 38 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Ogata,Modern Control Engineering, 5th ed

    K. Ogata,Modern Control Engineering, 5th ed. (Pearson Education, 2009)

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    Horowitz and W

    P. Horowitz and W. Hill,The Art of Electronics, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    work page 2015