pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22278 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

A Flavor Specific Chiral U(1)_X Framework for Explaining the ATOMKI Anomaly

Aditya Batra , F. R. Joaquim , Hemant Prajapati , Rahul Srivastava
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords ATOMKI anomalyZ' bosonU(1)_X gauge symmetryaxial-vector couplingstwo Higgs doublet modelnuclear transitionslight bosonanomaly cancellation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A chiral flavor-specific U(1)_X model with two Higgs doublets produces a 17 MeV Z' that fits the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a gauged chiral U(1)_X extension of the Standard Model that is flavor-specific. It uses a two-Higgs-doublet setup to give a light Z' boson the axial-vector couplings needed to mediate the observed transitions in beryllium-8 and helium-4. The construction cancels all gauge anomalies and yields consistent fermion masses. The parameter space that reproduces the ATOMKI signals also satisfies bounds from atomic parity violation, beam-dump searches, meson decays, and neutrino scattering. This shows that an axial-vector mediator can address the anomaly without immediate conflict with existing data.

Core claim

A gauged chiral flavor-specific U(1)_X symmetry, broken by two Higgs doublets, endows a 17 MeV Z' with non-vanishing axial-vector couplings to quarks and leptons while remaining anomaly-free and consistent with fermion mass generation; the same couplings simultaneously account for the ATOMKI signals in 8Be and 4He and evade the listed experimental constraints.

What carries the argument

Flavor-specific chiral U(1)_X gauge symmetry whose Z' acquires axial-vector couplings through a two-Higgs-doublet vacuum expectation value pattern.

If this is right

  • The model predicts specific branching ratios for the anomalous nuclear decays that match the reported ATOMKI rates.
  • The Z' remains consistent with null results from meson decay searches and neutrino-nucleus scattering.
  • Atomic parity violation measurements provide a direct test of the axial coupling strength.
  • The same symmetry breaking pattern that keeps the Z' light also fixes the pattern of fermion masses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar axial-vector constructions might address other low-energy discrepancies involving light bosons.
  • Future neutrino-electron scattering data at higher precision could further restrict or confirm the allowed coupling window.
  • Distinguishing axial from vector couplings experimentally would separate this class of explanations from purely vector Z' models.

Load-bearing premise

A two-Higgs-doublet framework can simultaneously produce the required axial-vector couplings for a light Z', cancel all gauge anomalies, and generate consistent fermion masses.

What would settle it

Observation of a parity-violating effect in atomic transitions whose strength lies outside the narrow range allowed by the model's axial couplings, or a clear signal of the Z' in a beam-dump experiment below the predicted production cross-section.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22278 by Aditya Batra, F. R. Joaquim, Hemant Prajapati, Rahul Srivastava.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic representation of the IPC process. An excited nucleus view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Schematic representation of the on-shell emission of a hypothesized view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The Parameter space in the space in the ( view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Parameter space in the ( view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Parameter space in the ( view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent anomalies in nuclear transitions observed by the ATOMKI collaboration suggest the existence of a new boson with a mass of $\sim 17$ MeV. A theoretically consistent interpretation requires a framework that not only matches the kinematics but also reproduces the observed decay rates while satisfying stringent experimental constraints. Among various possibilities, an axial-vector or mixed vector-axial-vector mediator $Z'$ emerges as the most viable candidate. However, getting such couplings for a light $Z'$ gauge boson is highly non trivial task. In this work, we construct a gauged chiral, flavor specific $U(1)_X$ extensions of the Standard Model where the associated $Z'$ boson acts as the $17$ MeV particle. By employing a two Higgs doublet framework, we generate the necessary non-vanishing axial-vector couplings while ensuring gauge anomaly cancellation and consistent fermion mass generation. Focusing on the $^8\mathrm{Be}$ and $^4\mathrm{He}$ signals, we show that in this model the viable parameter space to resolve the ATOMKI anomalies is also consistent with a diverse set of experimental constraints, including atomic parity violation, beam dump experiments, meson decays, and neutrino nucleus and neutrino electron scatterings. Our results demonstrate that this framework offers a theoretically sound and phenomenologically robust solution to the ATOMKI anomaly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a flavor-specific chiral U(1)_X gauge extension of the SM supplemented by a two-Higgs-doublet sector. It introduces a light Z' boson of mass ~17 MeV whose axial-vector couplings to nucleons are generated to explain the ATOMKI 8Be and 4He anomaly signals, while enforcing gauge-anomaly cancellation and realistic fermion mass matrices; the resulting parameter space is asserted to satisfy bounds from atomic parity violation, beam-dump searches, meson decays, and neutrino scattering.

Significance. If the explicit charge assignments simultaneously satisfy anomaly cancellation, produce non-vanishing axial couplings large enough to match the observed branching ratios, and permit consistent Yukawa textures without massless fermions or large FCNCs, the work would supply a UV-complete, phenomenologically viable explanation for the ATOMKI anomaly. The framework's strength lies in addressing the known difficulty of obtaining axial couplings for a light Z' while remaining compatible with multiple low-energy constraints.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 (charge assignment and anomaly cancellation): the U(1)_X charges assigned to the two Higgs doublets and all SM fermions are not listed explicitly, nor are the numerical values of the anomaly coefficients (e.g., [SU(3)]^2 U(1)_X, U(1)_X^3) provided. Because the axial couplings g_A^q are linear combinations of these charges, the central claim that non-vanishing axial-vector couplings to nucleons are generated cannot be verified without this information.
  2. [§5.1, Eq. (18)] §5.1, Eq. (18): the viable (g_X, m_Z') region is delimited by fitting the predicted 8Be and 4He branching ratios to the ATOMKI data and then checking consistency with other experiments. This procedure risks circularity; the manuscript should instead fix a charge solution from anomaly cancellation and mass-generation requirements first, then compute the predicted rates and demonstrate that they fall inside the experimental windows without further adjustment.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction refer to 'consistent fermion mass generation' but do not indicate whether the third-generation Yukawa terms are included or whether the resulting CKM matrix is realistic; a brief statement or reference to the mass-matrix diagonalization would improve clarity.
  2. [§2] Notation for the Z' axial and vector couplings (g_A^q vs. g_V^q) is introduced without a dedicated equation defining them in terms of the chiral charges; adding such an equation early in §2 would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will make the necessary revisions to improve clarity and verifiability.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (charge assignment and anomaly cancellation): the U(1)_X charges assigned to the two Higgs doublets and all SM fermions are not listed explicitly, nor are the numerical values of the anomaly coefficients (e.g., [SU(3)]^2 U(1)_X, U(1)_X^3) provided. Because the axial couplings g_A^q are linear combinations of these charges, the central claim that non-vanishing axial-vector couplings to nucleons are generated cannot be verified without this information.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, consolidated presentation of the charge assignments would facilitate verification. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated table in §3.2 listing the U(1)_X charges for both Higgs doublets and all SM fermion fields. We will also compute and tabulate the numerical values of the relevant anomaly coefficients ([SU(3)]^2 U(1)_X, [SU(2)]^2 U(1)_X, [U(1)_Y]^2 U(1)_X, U(1)_X^3, and the mixed gravitational anomaly), confirming their cancellation. The axial couplings g_A^q to quarks will then be shown explicitly as linear combinations of the left- and right-handed charges, demonstrating that they yield non-vanishing nucleon axial couplings consistent with the ATOMKI signals. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.1, Eq. (18)] §5.1, Eq. (18): the viable (g_X, m_Z') region is delimited by fitting the predicted 8Be and 4He branching ratios to the ATOMKI data and then checking consistency with other experiments. This procedure risks circularity; the manuscript should instead fix a charge solution from anomaly cancellation and mass-generation requirements first, then compute the predicted rates and demonstrate that they fall inside the experimental windows without further adjustment.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's concern about potential circularity in the presentation. The U(1)_X charges are determined first by the requirements of anomaly cancellation and the construction of realistic fermion mass matrices via the two-Higgs-doublet sector, without massless fermions or excessive FCNCs. These fixed charges fully determine the axial-vector couplings to quarks and nucleons. The parameters g_X (overall gauge coupling) and m_Z' are then varied subject to theoretical constraints such as perturbativity. Branching ratios for the nuclear transitions are computed from these couplings, and the (g_X, m_Z') region consistent with ATOMKI data is identified while imposing other experimental bounds. In the revision, we will explicitly outline this logical sequence, provide a concrete benchmark charge assignment satisfying all theoretical conditions, and present the resulting branching-ratio predictions prior to applying the experimental constraints. This will clarify that the viable region follows from the fixed charges rather than being adjusted to fit the data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: model charges and couplings constructed independently of ATOMKI fit

full rationale

The paper constructs explicit U(1)_X charge assignments for SM fermions and two Higgs doublets that simultaneously cancel all gauge anomalies, permit non-vanishing axial-vector Z' couplings to nucleons via the 2HDM, and allow Yukawa terms that generate realistic fermion masses without massless states. These charge choices are presented as a solution to the three coupled requirements; the axial coupling strength and Z' mass are then scanned to reproduce the observed 8Be and 4He branching ratios. The resulting viable points are checked against independent external constraints (APV, beam-dump limits, meson decays, neutrino scattering). No step reduces by construction to a fit of the target data, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and no known result is merely renamed. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained model building plus standard phenomenological validation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on standard anomaly cancellation, the assumption that two Higgs doublets suffice for fermion masses and axial couplings, and several free parameters (U(1)_X charges, Z' mass and mixing angles) chosen or fitted to match the 17 MeV signal.

free parameters (2)
  • U(1)_X charges for fermions
    Flavor-specific charges selected to produce desired axial-vector couplings while canceling anomalies.
  • Z' mass and coupling strengths
    Set near 17 MeV and adjusted to reproduce observed nuclear decay rates.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Gauge anomalies cancel in the chosen chiral U(1)_X charge assignment
    Invoked to ensure the quantum theory is consistent.
  • domain assumption Two-Higgs-doublet sector generates both fermion masses and non-zero axial couplings for Z'
    Central assumption enabling the light Z' phenomenology.
invented entities (1)
  • Light Z' gauge boson no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediator explaining the ATOMKI nuclear transitions
    Postulated new particle whose mass and couplings are tuned to the anomaly data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5549 in / 1469 out tokens · 51056 ms · 2026-05-08T11:10:54.755350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Later in 2017, the ATOMKI collaboration also reported an anomaly in the isovector (17 .64 MeV) M1 transition in 8Be [9]

    The best fit mass of this boson is estimated to be ∼ 17 MeV. Later in 2017, the ATOMKI collaboration also reported an anomaly in the isovector (17 .64 MeV) M1 transition in 8Be [9]. Since then, the ATOMKI collaboration has also reported anomalies in the the decays of excited 4He [11–13] (θe+e− ∼ 115◦) and, more recently, in 12C (θe+e− ∼ 150◦ − 160◦) [14] ...

    2017

  2. [2]

    The IPC decay of N∗ back to the ground state, N∗ →N 0 + e+e−, is then analyzed

    WHY IS IT SO CHALLENGING TO EXPLAIN THE ATOMKI ANOMALIES? In the ATOMKI experiment, a proton beam collides with a nucleus A at rest to produce an excited nuclear state N∗, via the process p + A→N ∗. The IPC decay of N∗ back to the ground state, N∗ →N 0 + e+e−, is then analyzed. In the past decade, the ATOMKI collaboration has 5 ATOMKI Measurements N∗ J P∗...

  3. [3]

    The present section is devoted to discuss how to construct an axial vector coupling between Z′ and SM fermions in U(1)X gauged models

    GENERATING AN AXIAL VECTOR COUPLING INU(1) X MODELS In this work, we build a flavor specific U(1)X model that can generate sizable axial couplings of the new boson Z′ with SM fermions. The present section is devoted to discuss how to construct an axial vector coupling between Z′ and SM fermions in U(1)X gauged models. 3 The interaction between gauge boson...

  4. [4]

    0 vΦ # ,⟨φ⟩= 1√ 2

    to ensure our results are widely applicable. This framework consists of two Higgs doublets, Φ and φ, and an arbitrary number of SM singlet scalars χi. A second Higgs doublet is required when the U(1)X charges are flavor specific to generate masses for all SM fermions (see Sec. 5). Meanwhile, the singlet scalars χi allow the Z′ mass to vary independently o...

  5. [5]

    (23) can be rewritten as, −Lψ int = ψγ µ(C ψ V +γ 5Cψ A)ψZ ′ µ , C ψ V /A = (gz′ ψR ±g z′ ψL )/2,(36) where we assume a diagonal coupling in the mass basis of fermions

    EXPERIMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ON A LIGHT SPIN-1 BOSON For our U(1)X gauge extension of the SM, the interaction between Z′ and a fermion ψ given in Eq. (23) can be rewritten as, −Lψ int = ψγ µ(C ψ V +γ 5Cψ A)ψZ ′ µ , C ψ V /A = (gz′ ψR ±g z′ ψL )/2,(36) where we assume a diagonal coupling in the mass basis of fermions. From the fundamental fermion couplings to ...

  6. [6]

    The requirement of a prompt decay inside the detector imposes the following constraints, q (C e V )2 + (Ce A)2 ≳3×10 −7 × p Br(Z ′ →e +e−).(37)

    Prompt decay in the ATOMKI detector :To produce the IPC signal, the Z′ boson must decay within the ATOMKI detector. The requirement of a prompt decay inside the detector imposes the following constraints, q (C e V )2 + (Ce A)2 ≳3×10 −7 × p Br(Z ′ →e +e−).(37)

  7. [7]

    Atomic parity violation :A light Z′ that couples to both electrons and nucleons can contribute to parity violation in atomic transitions. The effective low-energy operators 16 mediating such processes can be written as [25], −L= 1 M 2 Z′ Cu V Ce A (¯uγµu)(¯eγµγ5e) +C u ACe V (¯uγµγ5u)(¯eγµe) + (u↔d) ,(38) where the last term denotes the analogous contribu...

  8. [8]

    Recasting these bounds on the product of the electron vector and axial-vector couplings, we get [33], |C e V Ce A|≲10 −8 .(40)

    Parity violation in Møller Scattering :Precision measurements of parity violation in fixed-target electron-electron (Møller) scattering from the SLAC E158 experiment provide one of the most sensitive probes at low momentum transfer, Q2 = 0.0026 GeV2 [68]. Recasting these bounds on the product of the electron vector and axial-vector couplings, we get [33],...

  9. [9]

    The theoretically predicted value of ae using the measurements of the fine-structure constant from 87Rb [69] and 137Cs

    Magnetic Moment of electron and muon :Light vector or axial vector mediator coupling to electron/muon gives a contribution to ae/µ = (g− 2)e/µ/2. The theoretically predicted value of ae using the measurements of the fine-structure constant from 87Rb [69] and 137Cs

  10. [10]

    is 1 .6σ lower and −2.4σ higher, respectively than the direct experimental measurement ofa e [71], ∆ae(Rb) =a exp e −a th e = (4.8±3.0)×10 −13 , ∆ae(Cs) =a exp e −a th e = (−8.8±3.6)×10 −13 . (41) Similarly, following the 2025 white paper [ 72], which updated the theoretical SM prediction, the deviation between the experimental world average and the SM va...

    2025

  11. [11]

    Neglecting kinematic differences with respect to the pure dark photon case, Ref

    Electron positron annihilation into Z′ and a photon ( e+e− →Z ′γ) :The KLOE experiment searches for the process e+e− →Z ′γ followed by Z′ →e +e− [74]. Neglecting kinematic differences with respect to the pure dark photon case, Ref. [ 25] recasts these limits as, q (C e V )2 + (Ce A)2 ≲ 6.1×10 −4 p BR(Z ′ →e +e−) .(44)

  12. [12]

    Beam dump experiments :Electron beam dump experiments, such as SLAC E141 [ 75], SLAC E137 [76], Fermilab E774 [77], KEK [78] , and NA64 [ 79–81], search for Z′ production via bremsstrahlung from electrons scattering off target nuclei [ 82–84]. These experiments constrain the electron coupling with Z′ in two complementary regimes: either the coupling is su...

  13. [13]

    It also studied a variety of other processes with high precision, including the most accurate measurement to date of the rare charged pion decay π+ →e +νe e+e− [86]

    Pion decay constraints (SINDRUM-I) :The SINDRUM-I experiment employed a spectrometer originally designed to search for the lepton-number-violating process µ+ → e+e+e− [85]. It also studied a variety of other processes with high precision, including the most accurate measurement to date of the rare charged pion decay π+ →e +νe e+e− [86]. For a light scalar...

  14. [14]

    These constraints require the Z′ to exhibit protophobic vector couplings to quarks [22, 23, 25], |Cp| × p BR(Z ′ →e +e−)≲2.5×10 −4 .(47)

    Protophobic nature of vector coupling (π0 →γZ ′) :In the purely vector case, the 18 strongest bounds arise from the NA48 experiment’s searches for π0 →γ (Z′ →e +e−) decays, in dark photon searches [ 87]. These constraints require the Z′ to exhibit protophobic vector couplings to quarks [22, 23, 25], |Cp| × p BR(Z ′ →e +e−)≲2.5×10 −4 .(47)

  15. [15]

    Neutron lead scattering :The angular distribution in neutron lead scattering provides bounds on new light mediators, expressed as [23, 25, 88], |Cn| 126 208 Cn + 82 208 Cp ≲3.6×10 −5 .(48)

  16. [16]

    Neutrino electron (nucleus) scattering :One of the most stringent limits comes from the neutrino-electron ( ν−e ) elastic scattering and coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) [60, 89–97]. These experiments constrain the product of the neutrino and target fermion couplings, typically expressed as q |C ν V,ACe V,A| for electron scattering and...

  17. [17]

    Our analysis centers on the mixed vector–axial-vector scenario

    RESULTS Having discussed the allowed range of couplings, we now examine the parameter space required to accommodate the ATOMKI anomaly. Our analysis centers on the mixed vector–axial-vector scenario. In general, when both vector and axial-vector coupling are present, the decay width for on-shell Z′ emission is the direct sum of the two contributions. Howe...

  18. [18]

    In this work, we have investigated the possibility of explaining the ATOMKI anomalies within a class of gauged flavor specific chiral U(1)X extensions of the SM

    CONCLUSION The ATOMKI collaboration has reported persistent anomalies in the internal pair creation decays of excited states in 8Be, 4He, and 12C nuclei, consistently pointing toward the on-shell production of a light boson X with mass around 17 MeV. In this work, we have investigated the possibility of explaining the ATOMKI anomalies within a class of ga...

    2023

  19. [19]

    In this case, the right-handed down quark charges of the first and second generations are interchanged relative to those given in Table III

    Model I The U(1)X charge assignments of the particles in this model are presented in Table V. In this case, the right-handed down quark charges of the first and second generations are interchanged relative to those given in Table III. The corresponding vector and axial-vector couplings with fermions can be computed from these charges using Eq. (29), as li...

  20. [20]

    The corresponding U(1)X charge assignments are shown in Table VII

    Model II Here we present another model obtained by rearranging the charges of the quark singlets. The corresponding U(1)X charge assignments are shown in Table VII. In this case, the U(1)X charges FieldsU(1) X FieldsU(1) X Q1, Q2, Q3 − XL 3 L1, L2, L3 XL u1 R, u2 R, u3 R Xν − 4XL 3 ,− 4XL 3 ,− 4XL 3 e1 R, e2 R, e3 R (2XL,2X L,2X L −X ν) d1 R, d2 R, d3 R 2...

  21. [21]

    New Tests for Quark and Lepton Substructure,

    E. Eichten, K. D. Lane, and M. E. Peskin, “New Tests for Quark and Lepton Substructure,”Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 811–814

    1983

  22. [22]

    A Supersymmetry Primer

    S. P. Martin, “A Supersymmetry primer,”Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.18(1998) 1–98, arXiv:hep-ph/9709356

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  23. [23]

    Seesaw at LHC,

    B. Bajc and G. Senjanovic, “Seesaw at LHC,”JHEP08(2007) 014,arXiv:hep-ph/0612029

    work page arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    SO(10): A case for hadron colliders,

    A. Preda, G. Senjanovic, and M. Zantedeschi, “SO(10): A case for hadron colliders,”Phys. Lett. B838 (2023) 137746,arXiv:2201.02785 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Axion Emission in Decay of Excited Nuclear States,

    S. B. Treiman and F. Wilczek, “Axion Emission in Decay of Excited Nuclear States,”Phys. Lett. B74 (1978) 381–383

    1978

  26. [26]

    SEARCH FOR A LIGHT SCALAR BOSON EMITTED IN NUCLEAR DECAY,

    S. J. Freedman, J. Napolitano, J. Camp, and M. Kroupa, “SEARCH FOR A LIGHT SCALAR BOSON EMITTED IN NUCLEAR DECAY,”Phys. Rev. Lett.52(1984) 240–243

    1984

  27. [27]

    Search for a Shortlived Neutral Particle Produced in Nuclear Decay,

    M. J. Savage, R. D. Mckeown, B. W. Filippone, and L. W. Mitchell, “Search for a Shortlived Neutral Particle Produced in Nuclear Decay,”Phys. Rev. Lett.57(1986) 178–181

    1986

  28. [28]

    Observation of Anomalous Internal Pair Creation in Be8 : A Possible Indication of a Light, Neutral Boson,

    A. J. Krasznahorkayet al., “Observation of Anomalous Internal Pair Creation in Be8 : A Possible Indication of a Light, Neutral Boson,”Phys. Rev. Lett.116no. 4, (2016) 042501,arXiv:1504.01527 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    On the creation of the 17 MeV X boson in the 17.6 MeV M1 transition of 8Be,

    A. J. Krasznahorkayet al., “On the creation of the 17 MeV X boson in the 17.6 MeV M1 transition of 8Be,”EPJ Web Conf.142(2017) 01019

    2017

  30. [30]

    New results on the 8be anomaly,

    A. J. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatlos, L. Csige, Z. Gacsi, J. Gulyas, A. Nagy, N. Sas, J. Timar, T. G. Tornyi, I. Vajda, and A. J. Krasznahorkay, “New results on the 8be anomaly,”Journal of Physics: Conference Series1056no. 1, (Jul, 2018) 012028.https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1056/1/012028

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1056/1/012028 2018

  31. [31]

    New evidence supporting the existence of the hypothetic X17 particle,

    A. J. Krasznahorkayet al., “New evidence supporting the existence of the hypothetic X17 particle,” arXiv:1910.10459 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 1910

  32. [32]

    New anomaly observed in He4 supports the existence of the hypothetical X17 particle,

    A. J. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatl´ os, L. Csige, J. Guly´ as, A. Krasznahorkay, B. M. Nyak´ o, I. Rajta, J. Tim´ ar, I. Vajda, and N. J. Sas, “New anomaly observed in He4 supports the existence of the hypothetical X17 particle,”Phys. Rev. C104no. 4, (2021) 044003,arXiv:2104.10075 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Confirmation of the existence of the x17 particle,

    Firak, D. S., Krasznahorkay, A. J., Csatlos, M., Csige, L., Gulyas, J., Koszta, M., Szihalmi, B., Timar, J., Nagy, A., Sas, N. J., and Krasznahorkay, A., “Confirmation of the existence of the x17 particle,” EPJ Web Conf.232(2020) 04005.https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023204005

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202023204005 2020

  34. [34]

    New anomaly observed in 12C supports the existence and the vector character of the hypo- thetical X17 boson

    A. J. Krasznahorkayet al., “New anomaly observed in C12 supports the existence and the vector 30 character of the hypothetical X17 boson,”Phys. Rev. C106no. 6, (2022) L061601, arXiv:2209.10795 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Observation of the X17 anomaly in the 7Li(p,e+e−)8Be direct proton-capture reaction,

    N. J. Saset al., “Observation of the X17 anomaly in the 7Li(p,e+e−)8Be direct proton-capture reaction,”arXiv:2205.07744 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Neutrino constraints and the ATOMKI X17 anomaly,

    P. B. Denton and J. Gehrlein, “Neutrino constraints and the ATOMKI X17 anomaly,”Phys. Rev. D 108no. 1, (2023) 015009,arXiv:2304.09877 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Checking the 8Be Anomaly with a Two-Arm Electron Positron Pair Spectrometer,

    T. T. Anhet al., “Checking the 8Be Anomaly with a Two-Arm Electron Positron Pair Spectrometer,” Universe10no. 4, (2024) 168,arXiv:2401.11676 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Afanaciev et al

    MEG IICollaboration, K. Afanacievet al., “Search for the X17 particle in 7Li(p, e+e−)8Be processes with the MEG II detector,”arXiv:2411.07994 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    On the Atomki nuclear anomaly after the MEG-II result,

    D. Barducci, D. Germani, M. Nardecchia, S. Scacco, and C. Toni, “On the Atomki nuclear anomaly after the MEG-II result,”JHEP04(2025) 035,arXiv:2501.05507 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Bossiet al.,Search for a new 17 MeV resonance viae+e− annihilation with the PADME Experiment, JHEP 11 (2025) 007, arXiv:2505.24797

    F. Bossiet al., “Search for a new 17 MeV resonance viae +e− annihilation with the PADME Experiment,”arXiv:2505.24797 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Combined Evidence for the $X_{17}$ Boson After PADME Results on Resonant Production in Positron Annihilation

    F. Arias-Arag´ on, G. G. di Cortona, E. Nardi, and C. Toni, “Combined Evidence for theX 17 Boson After PADME Results on Resonant Production in Positron Annihilation,”arXiv:2504.11439 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Protophobic Fifth-Force Interpretation of the Observed Anomaly in 8Be Nuclear Transitions,

    J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolinsky, T. M. P. Tait, and P. Tanedo, “Protophobic Fifth-Force Interpretation of the Observed Anomaly in 8Be Nuclear Transitions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117 no. 7, (2016) 071803,arXiv:1604.07411 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Particle physics models for the 17 MeV anomaly in beryllium nuclear decays,

    J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolinsky, T. M. P. Tait, and P. Tanedo, “Particle physics models for the 17 MeV anomaly in beryllium nuclear decays,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 3, (2017) 035017,arXiv:1608.03591 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Dynamical Evidence For a Fifth Force Explanation of the ATOMKI Nuclear Anomalies,

    J. L. Feng, T. M. P. Tait, and C. B. Verhaaren, “Dynamical Evidence For a Fifth Force Explanation of the ATOMKI Nuclear Anomalies,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 3, (2020) 036016,arXiv:2006.01151 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    An updated view on the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies,

    D. Barducci and C. Toni, “An updated view on the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies,”JHEP02(2023) 154, arXiv:2212.06453 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 07, 168 (2023)]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Pion decay constraints on exotic 17 MeV vector bosons,

    M. Hostert and M. Pospelov, “Pion decay constraints on exotic 17 MeV vector bosons,”Phys. Rev. D 108no. 5, (2023) 055011,arXiv:2306.15077 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Constraining the axial-vector X17 interpretation with 12C data,

    C. J. G. Mommers and M. Vanderhaeghen, “Constraining the axial-vector X17 interpretation with 12C data,”Phys. Lett. B858(2024) 139031,arXiv:2406.08143 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    The X17 with Chiral Couplings,

    M. H. Fieg, T. M¨ akel¨ a, T. M. P. Tait, and M. Toman, “The X17 with Chiral Couplings,” arXiv:2602.11263 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Possible Explanation of the Electron Positron Anomaly at 17 MeV in 8BeTransitions Through a Light Pseudoscalar,

    U. Ellwanger and S. Moretti, “Possible Explanation of the Electron Positron Anomaly at 17 MeV in 8BeTransitions Through a Light Pseudoscalar,”JHEP11(2016) 039,arXiv:1609.01669 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    A Family-nonuniversal U(1)’ Model for Excited Beryllium Decays,

    B. Puli¸ ce, “A Family-nonuniversal U(1)’ Model for Excited Beryllium Decays,”Chin. J. Phys.71 (2021) 506–517,arXiv:1911.10482 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    A closer look at the U(1)B−L explanation of the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies,

    P. M. Ferreira, B. L. Gon¸ calves, and F. R. Joaquim, “A closer look at the U(1)B−L explanation of the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies,”JHEP04(2024) 003,arXiv:2311.18004 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    A 17 MeV pseudoscalar and the LSND, MiniBooNE and ATOMKI anomalies,

    W. Abdallah, R. Gandhi, T. Ghosh, N. Khan, S. Roy, and S. Roy, “A 17 MeV pseudoscalar and the LSND, MiniBooNE and ATOMKI anomalies,”JHEP10(2024) 086,arXiv:2406.07643 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Light Weakly Coupled Axial Forces: 31 Models, Constraints, and Projections,

    Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, S. Mishra-Sharma, and T. M. P. Tait, “Light Weakly Coupled Axial Forces: 31 Models, Constraints, and Projections,”JHEP05(2017) 002,arXiv:1609.09072 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    The lightUboson as the mediator of a new force, coupled to a combination ofQ, B, Land dark matter,

    P. Fayet, “The lightUboson as the mediator of a new force, coupled to a combination ofQ, B, Land dark matter,”Eur. Phys. J. C77no. 1, (2017) 53,arXiv:1611.05357 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    Realistic model for a fifth force explaining anomaly in 8Be∗ → 8Be e +e− Decay,

    P.-H. Gu and X.-G. He, “Realistic model for a fifth force explaining anomaly in 8Be∗ → 8Be e +e− Decay,”Nucl. Phys. B919(2017) 209–217,arXiv:1606.05171 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    Explanation of the 17 MeV Atomki anomaly in a U(1)’ -extended two Higgs doublet model,

    L. Delle Rose, S. Khalil, and S. Moretti, “Explanation of the 17 MeV Atomki anomaly in a U(1)’ -extended two Higgs doublet model,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 11, (2017) 115024,arXiv:1704.03436 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Atomki Anomaly in Family-DependentU(1) ′ Extension of the Standard Model,

    L. Delle Rose, S. Khalil, S. J. D. King, S. Moretti, and A. M. Thabt, “Atomki Anomaly in Family-DependentU(1) ′ Extension of the Standard Model,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 5, (2019) 055022, arXiv:1811.07953 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    UV-Complete Models for a Light Axial Gauge Boson,

    B. Dutta, A. Karthikeyan, and R. N. Mohapatra, “UV-Complete Models for a Light Axial Gauge Boson,”arXiv:2603.27280 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    Nonexotic Neutral Gauge Bosons,

    T. Appelquist, B. A. Dobrescu, and A. R. Hopper, “Nonexotic Neutral Gauge Bosons,”Phys. Rev. D 68(2003) 035012,arXiv:hep-ph/0212073

    work page arXiv 2003

  60. [60]

    Gauging U(1) symmetries and the number of right-handed neutrinos,

    J. C. Montero and V. Pleitez, “Gauging U(1) symmetries and the number of right-handed neutrinos,” Phys. Lett. B675(2009) 64–68,arXiv:0706.0473 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  61. [61]

    Dirac or inverse seesaw neutrino masses with B−L gauge symmetry and S3 flavor symmetry,

    E. Ma and R. Srivastava, “Dirac or inverse seesaw neutrino masses with B−L gauge symmetry and S3 flavor symmetry,”Phys. Lett. B741(2015) 217–222,arXiv:1411.5042 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  62. [62]

    Classically conformal U(1)’ extended standard model and Higgs vacuum stability,

    S. Oda, N. Okada, and D.-s. Takahashi, “Classically conformal U(1)’ extended standard model and Higgs vacuum stability,”Phys. Rev. D92no. 1, (2015) 015026,arXiv:1504.06291 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  63. [63]

    Classically conformal U(1)’ extended standard model, electroweak vacuum stability, and LHC Run-2 bounds,

    A. Das, S. Oda, N. Okada, and D.-s. Takahashi, “Classically conformal U(1)’ extended standard model, electroweak vacuum stability, and LHC Run-2 bounds,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 11, (2016) 115038, arXiv:1605.01157 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Minimal dirac neutrino mass models from U(1)R gauge symmetry and left–right asymmetry at colliders,

    S. Jana, P. K. Vishnu, and S. Saad, “Minimal dirac neutrino mass models from U(1)R gauge symmetry and left–right asymmetry at colliders,”Eur. Phys. J. C79no. 11, (2019) 916,arXiv:1904.07407 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    B−Lmodel in light of the CDF II result,

    S. Mandal, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, “B−Lmodel in light of the CDF II result,” arXiv:2301.01522 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    The Dark HyperCharge Symmetry,

    H. Prajapati and R. Srivastava, “The Dark HyperCharge Symmetry,”arXiv:2411.02512 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Light and HeavyZ ′ from Flavored ChiralU(1) X Gauge Symmetries: Purely Axial and Mixed Vector-Axial Couplings,

    H. K. Prajapati and R. Srivastava, “Light and HeavyZ ′ from Flavored ChiralU(1) X Gauge Symmetries: Purely Axial and Mixed Vector-Axial Couplings,”arXiv:2603.27157 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,

    S. L. Adler, “Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,”Phys. Rev.177(1969) 2426–2438

    1969

  69. [69]

    Anomalous Ward identities in spinor field theories,

    W. A. Bardeen, “Anomalous Ward identities in spinor field theories,”Phys. Rev.184(1969) 1848–1857

    1969

  70. [70]

    A PCAC puzzle: π0 →γγ in the σ model,

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, “A PCAC puzzle: π0 →γγ in the σ model,”Nuovo Cim. A60(1969) 47–61

    1969

  71. [71]

    The gravitational correction to pcac,

    R. Delbourgo and A. Salam, “The gravitational correction to pcac,”Phys. Lett. B40(1972) 381–382

    1972

  72. [72]

    An SU(2) Anomaly,

    E. Witten, “An SU(2) Anomaly,”Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 324–328

    1982

  73. [73]

    Gravitational Anomalies,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, “Gravitational Anomalies,”Nucl. Phys. B234(1984) 269

    1984

  74. [74]

    An Anomaly-free Atlas: charting the space of flavour-dependent gaugedU(1) extensions of the Standard Model,

    B. C. Allanach, J. Davighi, and S. Melville, “An Anomaly-free Atlas: charting the space of flavour-dependent gaugedU(1) extensions of the Standard Model,”JHEP02(2019) 082, arXiv:1812.04602 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 08, 064 (2019)]

    work page arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models

    G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models,”Phys. Rept.516(2012) 1–102,arXiv:1106.0034 32 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  76. [76]

    Neutral currents and the Higgs mechanism,

    D. A. Ross and M. J. G. Veltman, “Neutral currents and the Higgs mechanism,”Nucl. Phys. B95 (1975) 135–147

    1975

  77. [77]

    Classes of complete dark photon models constrained by Z-physics,

    M. P. Bento, H. E. Haber, and J. a. P. Silva, “Classes of complete dark photon models constrained by Z-physics,”Phys. Lett. B850(2024) 138501,arXiv:2311.04976 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Tree-level Unitarity in SU(2)L ×U(1) Y ×U(1) Y ′ Models,

    M. P. Bento, H. E. Haber, and J. a. P. Silva, “Tree-level Unitarity in SU(2)L ×U(1) Y ×U(1) Y ′ Models,” JHEP10(2023) 083,arXiv:2306.01836 [hep-ph]. [59]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, P. A. Zylaet al., “Review of Particle Physics,”PTEP2020 no. 8, (2020) 083C01

    work page arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Constraining low scale dark hypercharge symmetry at spallation, reactor, and dark matter direct detection experiments,

    A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, “Constraining low scale dark hypercharge symmetry at spallation, reactor, and dark matter direct detection experiments,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 7, (2025) 073006,arXiv:2411.04197 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Light axial vector bosons, nuclear transitions, and the 8Be anomaly,

    J. Kozaczuk, D. E. Morrissey, and S. R. Stroberg, “Light axial vector bosons, nuclear transitions, and the 8Be anomaly,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 11, (2017) 115024,arXiv:1612.01525 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.