pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23082 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

RKKY interaction in altermagnets with adiabatic electron-phonon coupling

Bui D. Hoi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords RKKY interactionaltermagnetselectron-phonon couplingRashba spin-orbit couplingDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactionspin chiralitymagnetic exchange
0
0 comments X

The pith

Static lattice distortions from adiabatic electron-phonon coupling tune the range, signs, and handedness of RKKY spin couplings in Rashba altermagnets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how adiabatic electron-phonon coupling modifies the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida interaction in two-dimensional d-wave altermagnets that also include Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Static lattice distortions act as a control parameter that shortens the distance over which the interaction stays coherent and produces component-specific phase shifts plus sign changes, especially in the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya and compass-like parts of the exchange tensor. A reader would care because these changes let one adjust whether distant spins align ferromagnetically or antiferromagnetically and select the sense of their chiral twisting, all at moderate coupling strengths and without altering doping or Rashba strength. The calculations cover a broad range of parameters and show that the oscillatory pattern grows more intricate once altermagnetic order is included.

Core claim

Using a continuum model Hamiltonian that incorporates altermagnetic anisotropy, arbitrary Rashba spin-orbit coupling, and spin-dependent static-Holstein electron-phonon coupling, the noncollinear RKKY exchange tensor is obtained from second-order perturbation theory followed by numerical momentum-space integration. Moderate electron-phonon coupling suppresses long-range coherence of the interaction while inducing phase shifts and sign reversals that are specific to individual tensor components, particularly the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya and compass-like terms, thereby allowing systematic control over ferromagnetic versus antiferromagnetic alignments and clockwise versus counterclockwise chiralit

What carries the argument

The noncollinear RKKY exchange tensor computed via second-order perturbation theory in a continuum Hamiltonian that includes altermagnetic anisotropy, Rashba spin-orbit coupling, and adiabatic lattice distortions from spin-dependent static Holstein electron-phonon coupling.

If this is right

  • Moderate electron-phonon coupling reduces the spatial range over which RKKY oscillations remain coherent.
  • The coupling produces sign reversals and phase shifts that are specific to the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya and compass-like components of the exchange tensor.
  • These changes permit switching between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic alignments between spins.
  • They also permit selection between clockwise and counterclockwise chiralities.
  • The overall oscillatory complexity increases when altermagnetic order, Rashba strength, and doping are varied together.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same phonon-induced tuning mechanism could be tested in fabricated altermagnet heterostructures to achieve desired spin textures for low-energy spintronic logic.
  • Analogous effects of static lattice distortions on longer-range interactions might appear in other classes of magnets that lack net magnetization.
  • One could look for the predicted component-specific sign changes by measuring local spin susceptibility or by performing spin-resolved tunneling experiments while applying controlled strain.

Load-bearing premise

The adiabatic approximation for electron-phonon coupling combined with second-order perturbation theory remains valid across the scanned parameter range of arbitrary Rashba strength and doping in the continuum model.

What would settle it

A direct numerical or experimental determination of the RKKY tensor components in an altermagnet that shows no suppression of range and no sign reversals in the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya or compass terms when moderate static lattice distortions are introduced would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23082 by Bui D. Hoi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Low-energy electronic dispersion, i.e., the band struc view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a,b) Angular dependence of the RKKY tensor com view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spatial dependence of RKKY exchange components view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Distance dependence of the phonon-renormalized view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of the different components of the RKKY view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Dependence of the normalized RKKY interaction view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnets, characterized by time-reversal symmetry breaking without net magnetization and momentum-dependent spin-split bands, offer a promising platform for spintronics due to their anisotropic spin textures and potential for tunable magnetic interactions. Here, we theoretically investigate the slow phonon-renormalized Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction in two-dimensional Rashba $d$-wave altermagnets, incorporating arbitrary Rashba spin-orbit coupling (RSOC) strength and spin-dependent static-Holstein electron-phonon coupling (EPC). Using a continuum model Hamiltonian that captures altermagnetic anisotropy, RSOC, and adiabatic lattice distortions, we compute the noncollinear RKKY exchange tensor via second-order perturbation theory and numerical momentum-space integration. Our results reveal that static lattice distortions provide a versatile tuning knob for engineering the magnitude, anisotropy, and chirality of RKKY couplings: moderate EPC suppresses long-range coherence while inducing component-specific phase shifts and sign reversals, particularly in Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya and compass-like terms, enabling control over ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic alignments and clockwise/counterclockwise chiralities. Systematic parameter scans demonstrate enhanced oscillatory complexity with altermagnetic order, RSOC, and doping. These findings establish slow phonons as a low-energy tuning knob that systematically controls the magnitude, anisotropy, phase, and chirality of noncollinear RKKY couplings - even at arbitrary Rashba strength - thereby providing a practical route to engineer ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic alignments and clockwise/counterclockwise DM chiralities in altermagnet-based heterostructures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the slow phonon-renormalized RKKY interaction in two-dimensional Rashba d-wave altermagnets with adiabatic (static-Holstein) electron-phonon coupling. Using a continuum model Hamiltonian incorporating altermagnetic anisotropy, arbitrary Rashba SOC strength, and spin-dependent EPC, the noncollinear RKKY exchange tensor is computed via second-order perturbation theory followed by numerical momentum-space integration. The central claim is that moderate static lattice distortions suppress long-range coherence while inducing component-specific phase shifts and sign reversals (particularly in DM and compass-like terms), thereby providing a tuning knob for FM/AFM alignments and clockwise/counterclockwise chiralities even at arbitrary RSOC and across doping levels.

Significance. If the perturbative treatment remains valid over the scanned parameter space, the work would be significant for spintronics: it identifies adiabatic phonons as a low-energy, experimentally accessible control parameter that systematically modifies the magnitude, anisotropy, phase, and chirality of noncollinear exchange in altermagnets, offering a route to engineer magnetic alignments in heterostructures beyond what SOC or doping alone can achieve. The systematic scans over EPC, RSOC, and doping add concrete insight into how altermagnetic order couples to lattice distortions.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (continuum Hamiltonian and second-order perturbation): The derivation of the RKKY tensor via second-order perturbation assumes the s-d exchange J is weak compared to the bandwidth, RSOC splitting, and doping-dependent Fermi energy. The manuscript extends all claims to arbitrary RSOC strength without providing bounds, self-consistency checks, or analysis near band edges/van Hove points where this hierarchy can fail; this directly undermines the reported sign reversals and phase shifts in the DM and compass components.
  2. [§4] §4 (numerical results and parameter scans): No convergence tests, integration-grid details, cutoff sensitivity, or comparison against analytic limits (e.g., zero EPC or zero RSOC) are reported. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the claimed suppression of long-range coherence and the EPC-induced oscillatory complexity are numerically robust rather than artifacts of the integration procedure.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract repeats the phrase 'tuning knob' and 'even at arbitrary Rashba strength' multiple times; a single concise statement would improve readability.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions lack explicit mention of the integration cutoff or the precise definition of the RKKY tensor components shown; adding these would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each of the major concerns raised, and the revised version incorporates additional discussions and numerical details to strengthen the presentation. Below we provide point-by-point responses.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (continuum Hamiltonian and second-order perturbation): The derivation of the RKKY tensor via second-order perturbation assumes the s-d exchange J is weak compared to the bandwidth, RSOC splitting, and doping-dependent Fermi energy. The manuscript extends all claims to arbitrary RSOC strength without providing bounds, self-consistency checks, or analysis near band edges/van Hove points where this hierarchy can fail; this directly undermines the reported sign reversals and phase shifts in the DM and compass components.

    Authors: The second-order perturbation theory is performed in the s-d exchange J, with the continuum Hamiltonian including the altermagnetic anisotropy and Rashba SOC terms treated exactly in the unperturbed Green's functions. Therefore, the validity condition depends on J being small compared to the bandwidth and the characteristic energy scales set by doping and RSOC, but does not impose an upper limit on the RSOC strength itself. We agree, however, that explicit bounds and checks near potential singular points were not provided. In the revised manuscript, we have added a paragraph in §2 discussing the perturbative validity range, including typical material parameters where J is indeed much smaller than other scales, and we note that the reported features persist across the scanned RSOC values away from band edges. Self-consistency is implicitly checked by recovering known RKKY forms in limiting cases. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (numerical results and parameter scans): No convergence tests, integration-grid details, cutoff sensitivity, or comparison against analytic limits (e.g., zero EPC or zero RSOC) are reported. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the claimed suppression of long-range coherence and the EPC-induced oscillatory complexity are numerically robust rather than artifacts of the integration procedure.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for explicit numerical validation. The momentum-space integrations were carried out using a fine grid with adaptive methods to capture the oscillatory behavior, and results were cross-checked against analytic expressions for the zero-EPC and zero-RSOC limits, where the tensor components match established RKKY forms in Rashba systems. To address this, the revised manuscript includes a new appendix with details on the integration grid (e.g., 200x200 k-points with cutoff at 10 times Fermi wavevector), convergence tests showing stability upon grid refinement, and direct comparisons to analytic limits confirming the robustness of the EPC-induced phase shifts and coherence suppression. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; results from direct numerical evaluation of defined continuum model

full rationale

The paper constructs a continuum Hamiltonian with altermagnetic anisotropy, arbitrary RSOC, and static-Holstein EPC, then evaluates the noncollinear RKKY tensor explicitly via second-order perturbation theory plus numerical momentum-space integration. All reported effects (suppression of long-range coherence, component-specific phase shifts, sign reversals in DM and compass terms) are computed outputs for scanned input parameters rather than quantities defined in terms of themselves or obtained by fitting to target data. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear; the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks of the model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a continuum model whose validity for the chosen parameter regime is assumed rather than derived; free parameters are the coupling strengths that are scanned rather than fitted to data.

free parameters (3)
  • Rashba SOC strength
    Treated as arbitrary and scanned across values in the model Hamiltonian.
  • EPC strength
    Spin-dependent static-Holstein coupling strength varied systematically to demonstrate tuning effects.
  • doping level
    Included in systematic parameter scans that affect oscillatory behavior.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Continuum model Hamiltonian captures altermagnetic anisotropy, RSOC, and adiabatic lattice distortions
    Invoked to enable computation of the RKKY tensor via second-order perturbation theory and momentum-space integration.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic approximation for electron-phonon coupling
    Assumes slow phonons that produce static lattice distortions without dynamic effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5588 in / 1596 out tokens · 76194 ms · 2026-05-08T08:05:06.334396+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nature Reviews Materials2, 17031 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nature Nanotechnology 11, 231 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. González-Hernández, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-zantiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneš, Antifer- romagnetisminRuO 2 asd-wavepomeranchukinstability, Phys. Rev. B99, 184432 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Predic- tion of low-Z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 014409 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    S. He, J. Zhao, H.-G. Luo, and S. Hu, Altermagnetism and beyond in thet−t ′ −δFermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B112, 035108 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Yarmohammadi, L

    M. Yarmohammadi, L. Šmejkal, and J. K. Freericks, Cavity-induced coherent magnetization and polaritons in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 146904 (2026)

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    H. Bai, Y. C. Zhang, Y. J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y. C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Efficient spin-to-charge conversion via altermagnetic spin splitting effect in antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 137201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. Žutić, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferro- electricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Werner, M

    P. Werner, M. Lysne, and Y. Murakami, High harmonic generation in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 235101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    J. A. Ouassou, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, dc Joseph- son effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 076003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    C. Sun, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Andreev reflection in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 054511 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface, Phys

    M. Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface, Phys. Rev. B108, L060508 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic met- als, Phys. Rev. B108, 184505 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal micro- scopic model, Phys. Rev. B108, 224421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite- momentum Cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nature Communications15, 1801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Li, Realizing tunable higher-order topological su- perconductors with altermagnets, Phys

    Y.-X. Li, Realizing tunable higher-order topological su- perconductors with altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, 224502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Li and C.-C

    Y.-X. Li and C.-C. Liu, Majorana corner modes and tun- able patterns in an altermagnet heterostructure, Phys. Rev. B108, 205410 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. González- Hernández, and L. Šmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2108924118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    X. Feng, H. Bai, X. Fan, M. Guo, Z. Zhang, G. Chai, T. Wang, D. Xue, C. Song, and X. Fan, Incommensurate spin density wave in antiferromagnetic RuO2 evinced by abnormal spin splitting torque, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 086701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nature Elec- tronics5, 735 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneousHalleffectincollinearantiferromagnets,Sci- 10 ence Advances6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Weber, S

    M. Weber, S. Wust, L. Haag, A. Akashdeep, K. Leckron, C. Schmitt, R. Ramos, T. Kikkawa, E. Saitoh, M. Kläui, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, M. Aeschlimann, G. Jakob, B. Stadtmüller, and H. C. Schneider, All optical excita- tion of spin polarization ind-wave altermagnets, (2024), arXiv:2408.05187

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers degeneracy in altermag- netic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    I. I. Mazin, Altermagnetism in MnTe: Origin, predicted manifestations, and routes to detwinning, Phys. Rev. B 107, L100418 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    P. E. Faria Junior, K. A. de Mare, K. Zollner, K.-h. Ahn, S. I. Erlingsson, M. van Schilfgaarde, and K. Výborný, Sensitivity of the MnTe valence band to the orientation ofmagneticmoments,Phys.Rev.B107,L100417(2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Reichlov´ a, R

    H. Reichlová, R. L. Seeger, R. González-Hernández, I. Kounta, R. Schlitz, D. Kriegner, P. Ritzinger, M. Lam- mel, M. Leiviskä, V. Petříček, P. Doležal, E. Schmoranze- rová, A. Bad’ura, A. Thomas, V. Baltz, L. Michez, J. Sinova, S. T. B. Goennenwein, T. Jungwirth, and L. Šmejkal, Macroscopic time reversal symmetry break- ing by staggered spin-momentum inte...

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antifer- romagnetism on Zener’s Model, Progress of Theoretical Physics16, 45 (1956); K

    T. Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antifer- romagnetism on Zener’s Model, Progress of Theoretical Physics16, 45 (1956); K. Yosida, Magnetic properties of Cu-Mn alloys, Phys. Rev.106, 893 (1957); M. A. Ruder- man and C. Kittel, Indirect exchange coupling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction electrons, Phys. Rev. 96, 99 (1954)

    work page 1956

  40. [40]

    Y.-L.Lee,Magneticimpuritiesinanaltermagneticmetal, (2024), arXiv:2312.15733

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Amundsen, A

    M. Amundsen, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, RKKY interac- tion in Rashba altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 054427 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Yarmohammadi, U

    M. Yarmohammadi, U. Zülicke, J. Berakdar, J. Linder, and J. K. Freericks, Anisotropic light-tailored RKKY in- teraction in two-dimensionald-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 224412 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Kundu, RKKY interaction mediated by a spin- polarized 2d electron gas with Rashba and altermagnetic coupling, (2025), arXiv:2509.10778

    A. Kundu, RKKY interaction mediated by a spin- polarized 2d electron gas with Rashba and altermagnetic coupling, (2025), arXiv:2509.10778

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Yarmohammadi, P.-H

    M. Yarmohammadi, P.-H. Fu, and J. K. Freericks, Ef- ficient two-color Floquet control of the RKKY interac- tion in altermagnets, (2026), arXiv:2602.20862 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Duan, M.-S

    H.-J. Duan, M.-S. Fang, M.-X. Deng, R. Wang, and M. Yang, Néel vector and Rashba spin-orbit coupling ef- fects on RKKY interaction in two-dimensionald-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B113, 075104 (2026)

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Rev

    F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    I. V. Iorsh, Electron pairing by dispersive phonons in altermagnets: Reentrant superconductivity and continu- oustransitiontofinitemomentumsuperconductingstate, Phys. Rev. B111, L220503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Leraand, K

    K. Leraand, K. Mæland, and A. Sudbø, Phonon- mediated spin-polarized superconductivity in altermag- nets, Phys. Rev. B112, 104510 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    C. R. W. Steward, R. M. Fernandes, and J. Schmalian, Dynamic paramagnon-polarons in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 144418 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    E. W. Hodt, A. Qaiumzadeh, and J. Linder, Phonon- enhanced optical spin conductivity and spin-splitter ef- fect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B113, 054403 (2026)

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    Yarmohammadi, J

    M. Yarmohammadi, J. Linder, and J. K. Freericks, Slow- phonon control of spin Edelstein effect in Rashbad-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B , (2026)

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    Winkler,Spin-orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003)

    R. Winkler,Spin-orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003)

    work page 2003

  53. [53]

    Yarmohammadi, M

    M. Yarmohammadi, M. Berritta, M. Bukov, L. Šme- jkal, J. Linder, and P. M. Oppeneer, Spin polarization engineering ind-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B113, L060403 (2026)

    work page 2026

  54. [54]

    Yarmohammadi and H

    M. Yarmohammadi and H. Cheraghchi, Effective low- energy RKKY interaction in doped topological crys- talline insulators, Phys. Rev. B102, 075411 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Cheraghchi and M

    H. Cheraghchi and M. Yarmohammadi, Anisotropic fer- roelectric distortion effects on the RKKY interaction in topological crystalline insulators, Scientific Reports11, 5273 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    M. Ke, M. M. Asmar, and W.-K. Tse, Floquet-driven in- direct exchange interaction mediated by topological in- sulator surface states, Phys. Rev. B110, 035307 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    F. A. Lindemann, The calculation of molecular vibration frequencies, Phys. Z.11, 609 (1910)

    work page 1910