pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23164 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-25 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum criticality from spectral collapse in the two-photon Rabi model

Jiong Li , Jun-ling Wang , Qing-Hu Chen , Hai-Qing Lin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords two-photon Rabi modelspectral collapsequantum phase transitionquantum criticalitysoft modeuniversality classanisotropic Rabi modelKibble-Zurek dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spectral collapse in the anisotropic two-photon Rabi model is a continuous quantum phase transition governed by one soft mode.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that spectral collapse, long viewed as incompatible with quantum criticality because the overall excitation gap does not vanish, becomes a genuine continuous phase transition once anisotropy is included. The gap between states of the same parity closes at the critical coupling with a square-root power law, matching the universality class of the standard one-photon Rabi model. The inter-parity splitting stays finite and is attributed to symmetry rather than criticality. This single soft mode then sets the only relevant energy scale, which controls static observables, quantum Fisher information, and nonequilibrium Kibble-Zurek scaling. A reader would care because the finding turns a small, experimentally accessible system into a platform for studying quantum criticality without thermodynamic limits.

Core claim

In the anisotropic two-photon quantum Rabi model, spectral collapse at a finite coupling strength constitutes a genuine continuous quantum phase transition governed by a single soft mode. The excitation gap within the same parity closes as ε_sp ∼ |g − g_c|^{1/2}, placing the system in the same universality class as the standard quantum Rabi model, while the gap between different parities is a symmetry-induced splitting that does not control critical behavior. This soft mode supplies the unique energy scale that governs both equilibrium properties such as macroscopic observables and quantum Fisher information and nonequilibrium phenomena such as Kibble-Zurek dynamics.

What carries the argument

The same-parity excitation gap that vanishes at the critical coupling and functions as the sole soft mode determining universal scaling.

If this is right

  • The vanishing same-parity gap controls the divergence of macroscopic observables near the critical point.
  • Quantum Fisher information scales according to the soft-mode exponent.
  • Kibble-Zurek defect production during finite-time ramps follows the 1/2 exponent of the soft mode.
  • Universality class is fixed solely by the soft-mode structure rather than by photon number or microscopic details.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experimental platforms with tunable anisotropy, such as circuit-QED devices, could directly observe the predicted same-parity gap closing.
  • The soft-mode identification method may extend to other multi-photon Rabi models to classify their transitions.
  • Nonequilibrium protocols that ramp across the collapse point could provide cleaner signatures of the 1/2 scaling than equilibrium spectroscopy.

Load-bearing premise

That the same-parity gap is the only relevant soft mode near the transition and that no additional level crossings or other modes alter the scaling.

What would settle it

Direct numerical diagonalization or spectroscopic measurement showing whether the same-parity gap closes exactly with exponent 1/2 at the spectral-collapse point while the opposite-parity gap remains finite.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23164 by Hai-Qing Lin, Jiong Li, Jun-ling Wang, Qing-Hu Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Energy spectra in the view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Wigner phase-space distributions view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Log-log scaling of (a) the energy gap view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Residual energy view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spectral collapse in the two-photon quantum Rabi model (tpQRM) has long been regarded as incompatible with quantum criticality due to the absence of a vanishing excitation gap. We show that, in the anisotropic tpQRM, spectral collapse constitutes a genuine continuous quantum phase transition governed by a single soft mode. The excitation gap within the same parity closes as $\epsilon_{sp} \sim |g - g_c|^{z\nu}$ with $z\nu = 1/2$, placing the system in the same universality class as the standard QRM, while the gap between different parities reflects symmetry-induced level splitting rather than a critical excitation. This soft mode defines a unique energy scale that controls both equilibrium and nonequilibrium properties, including macroscopic observables, quantum Fisher information, and Kibble-Zurek dynamics. These results establish spectral collapse as an experimentally accessible realization of quantum criticality in a few-body system and demonstrate that universality is fully determined by the soft-mode structure rather than by microscopic details.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the anisotropic two-photon quantum Rabi model (tpQRM) and argues that spectral collapse constitutes a continuous quantum phase transition governed by a single soft mode. The same-parity excitation gap closes as ε_sp ∼ |g − g_c|^{zν} with zν = 1/2, placing the transition in the same universality class as the standard QRM; inter-parity gaps are interpreted as symmetry-induced splittings rather than critical excitations. This soft mode is claimed to control equilibrium observables, quantum Fisher information, and Kibble-Zurek dynamics, establishing spectral collapse as an experimentally accessible realization of quantum criticality in a few-body system.

Significance. If the single-soft-mode identification and exponent extraction are robust, the result would resolve prior concerns that spectral collapse in the tpQRM lacks a vanishing gap and therefore cannot be critical. It would supply a concrete few-body example of universality determined by soft-mode structure rather than microscopic details, with direct implications for circuit-QED and trapped-ion experiments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and spectral analysis section] The central universality-class assignment rests on the claim that the same-parity gap ε_sp is the sole relevant soft mode while the inter-parity splitting remains non-critical (Abstract; the spectral analysis following Eq. (1)). The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly, via the low-energy spectrum or effective Hamiltonian near g_c, that anisotropic terms do not generate parity-mixing couplings or additional soft modes that would alter the exponent or invalidate the single-mode picture; without this decoupling, the zν = 1/2 assignment does not follow.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the anisotropic parameter and the definition of g_c should be introduced earlier and used consistently to avoid ambiguity when comparing to the isotropic tpQRM.
  2. Figure captions for the gap-closing plots should include the fitting procedure and the range of g used to extract zν = 1/2.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment. We address the major point below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested explicit demonstration.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and spectral analysis section] The central universality-class assignment rests on the claim that the same-parity gap ε_sp is the sole relevant soft mode while the inter-parity splitting remains non-critical (Abstract; the spectral analysis following Eq. (1)). The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly, via the low-energy spectrum or effective Hamiltonian near g_c, that anisotropic terms do not generate parity-mixing couplings or additional soft modes that would alter the exponent or invalidate the single-mode picture; without this decoupling, the zν = 1/2 assignment does not follow.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of the decoupling is important for rigor. The spectral analysis following Eq. (1) already shows that the same-parity gap closes as ε_sp ∼ |g − g_c|^{1/2} while inter-parity gaps remain finite and non-critical. The anisotropic tpQRM Hamiltonian preserves a generalized parity symmetry (a Z_2 symmetry that commutes with the full Hamiltonian), which forbids parity-mixing couplings by construction. Consequently, anisotropic terms cannot generate additional soft modes or alter the exponent. To make this fully explicit as requested, we will add a short derivation of the effective low-energy Hamiltonian projected onto the same-parity subspace near g_c in the revised manuscript. This will confirm the absence of relevant parity-mixing operators and solidify the single-soft-mode picture with zν = 1/2. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows from direct spectral analysis.

full rationale

The paper derives the zν=1/2 scaling for the intra-parity gap ε_sp from explicit diagonalization or solution of the anisotropic tpQRM Hamiltonian, identifying the same-parity soft mode as the controlling scale for criticality. This is not equivalent to any input by construction, nor does it rely on fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citation load-bearing uniqueness theorems, or smuggled ansatzes. The distinction between intra- and inter-parity gaps is a direct consequence of the parity symmetry in the model equations rather than a tautological redefinition. The universality-class claim is thus an independent output of the spectral structure and remains falsifiable against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard construction of the two-photon Rabi Hamiltonian with an added anisotropy term, plus the assumption that parity symmetry partitions the spectrum into independent sectors whose gaps can be analyzed separately.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The two-photon Rabi Hamiltonian conserves parity, allowing the spectrum to be block-diagonalized into even and odd sectors.
    Invoked when distinguishing same-parity and different-parity gaps in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Spectral collapse occurs at a finite critical coupling g_c that can be tuned by the anisotropy parameter.
    The model is defined such that collapse happens at a tunable point; this is standard for Rabi-type models but not derived here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1512 out tokens · 81950 ms · 2026-05-08T08:16:37.582953+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    60 (blue)

    25 (red) and r = 0 . 60 (blue). The corresponding scaling exponents for each observable are indicated. Universality from a soft mode.— At ∆ = ∆ c, low- energy properties are universally governed by the vanish- ing soft-mode gap ǫsp. As a direct consequence, the fluc- tuations of the quadratures x =a +a† andp =i(a† − a) exhibit universal scaling in the grou...

    work page

  2. [2]

    I. I. Rabi, On the process of space quantization, Phys. Rev. 49, 324 (1936)

    work page 1936

  3. [3]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cam- bridge University Press, 1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Meystre and M

    P. Meystre and M. Sargent, Elements of quantum optics , 4th ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Braak, Q.-H

    D. Braak, Q.-H. Chen, M. T. Batchelor, and E. Solano, Semi-classical and quantum Rabi models: in celebration of 80 years, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 300301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Meystre, Quantum optics: Taming the quantum , Graduate texts in physics (Springer International Pub- lishing, Cham, 2021)

    P. Meystre, Quantum optics: Taming the quantum , Graduate texts in physics (Springer International Pub- lishing, Cham, 2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Wallraff, D

    A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.-S. Huang, J. Majer, S. Kumar, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Strong coupling of a single photon to a super- conducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature 431, 162 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Peropadre, P

    B. Peropadre, P. Forn-D ´ ıaz, E. Solano, and J. J. Garc ´ ıa- Ripoll, Switchable ultrastrong coupling in circuit qed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 023601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Niemczyk, F

    T. Niemczyk, F. Deppe, H. Huebl, E. P. Menzel, F. Hocke, M. J. Schwarz, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, D. Zueco, T. H¨ ummer, E. Solano, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys. 6, 772 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    J. S. Pedernales, I. Lizuain, S. Felicetti, G. Romero, L. Lamata, and E. Solano, Quantum rabi model with trapped ions, Sci. Rep. 5, 15472 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    D. Lv, S. An, Z. Liu, J.-N. Zhang, J. S. Pedernales, L. Lamata, E. Solano, and K. Kim, Quantum simula- tion of the quantum Rabi model in a trapped ion, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021027 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    J. Koch, G. R. Hunanyan, T. Ockenfels, E. Rico, E. Solano, and M. Weitz, Quantum Rabi dynamics of trapped atoms far in the deep strong coupling regime, Nat. Commun. 14, 954 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Hennessy, A

    K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, M. Winger, D. Gerace, M. Atat¨ ure, S. Gulde, S. F¨ alt, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Quantum nature of a strongly coupled sin- gle quantum dot–cavity system, Nature 445, 896 (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    Englund, A

    D. Englund, A. Faraon, I. Fushman, N. Stoltz, P. Petroff, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Controlling cavity reflectivity with a single quantum dot, Nature 450, 857 (2007)

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, M. Simoen, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, and P. Delsing, Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit, Nature 479, 376 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    X. Cao, J. Q. You, H. Zheng, and F. Nori, A qubit strongly coupled to a resonant cavity: asymmetry of the spontaneous emission spectrum beyond the rotating wave approximation, New J. Phys. 13, 073002 (2011)

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Ridolfo, M

    A. Ridolfo, M. Leib, S. Savasta, and M. J. Hartmann, Photon blockade in the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 193602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    K´ ena-Cohen, S

    S. K´ ena-Cohen, S. A. Maier, and D. D. C. Bradley, Ul- trastrongly coupled exciton–polaritons in metal-clad or- ganic semiconductor microcavities, Adv. Opt. Mater. 1, 827 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Ashhab, Superradiance transition in a system with a single qubit and a single oscillator, Phys

    S. Ashhab, Superradiance transition in a system with a single qubit and a single oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 87, 013826 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Hwang, R

    M.-J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum phase transition and universal dynamics in the Rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Hwang, P

    M.-J. Hwang, P. Rabl, and M. B. Plenio, Dissipative phase transition in the open quantum Rabi model, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013825 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Cai, Z.-D

    M.-L. Cai, Z.-D. Liu, W.-D. Zhao, Y.-K. Wu, Q.-X. Mei, Y. Jiang, L. He, X. Zhang, Z.-C. Zhou, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of a quantum phase transition in the quan- tum Rabi model with a single trapped ion, Nat. Commun. 12, 1126 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    X. Chen, Z. Wu, M. Jiang, X.-Y. L¨ u, X. Peng, and J. Du, Experimental quantum simulation of superradiant phase transition beyond no-go theorem via antisqueezing, Nat. Commun. 12, 6281 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Z. Wu, C. Hu, T. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Li, L. Zhao, X.- Y. L¨ u, and X. Peng, Experimental quantum simulation of multicriticality in closed and open Rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 173602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Garbe, I

    L. Garbe, I. L. Egusquiza, E. Solano, C. Ciuti, T. Coudreau, P. Milman, and S. Felicetti, Superradi- ant phase transition in the ultrastrong-coupling regime of the two-photon Dicke model, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053854 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    S. Cui, B. Gr´ emaud, W. Guo, and G. G. Batrouni, Nonlinear two-photon Rabi-Hubbard model: superra- diance, photon, and photon-pair Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. A 102, 033334 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Felicetti, D

    S. Felicetti, D. Z. Rossatto, E. Rico, E. Solano, and P. Forn-D ´ ıaz, Two-photon quantum Rabi model with su- perconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013851 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Felicetti, M.-J

    S. Felicetti, M.-J. Hwang, and A. Le Boit´ e, Ultrastron g- coupling regime of nondipolar light-matter interactions, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053859 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    S.-P. Wang, A. Mercurio, A. Ridolfo, Y. Wang, M. Chen, W. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Sun, T. Li, F. Nori, S. Savasta, and J. Q. You, Strong coupling between a single-photon and a two-photon Fock state, Nat. Commun. 16, 8730 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Del Valle, S

    E. Del Valle, S. Zippilli, F. P. Laussy, A. Gonzalez- Tudela, G. Morigi, and C. Tejedor, Two-photon lasing by a single quantum dot in a high-Q microcavity, Phys. Rev. B 81, 035302 (2010)

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    Felicetti, J

    S. Felicetti, J. S. Pedernales, I. L. Egusquiza, G. Rome ro, L. Lamata, D. Braak, and E. Solano, Spectral collapse via two-phonon interactions in trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A 92, 033817 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Puebla, J

    R. Puebla, J. Casanova, O. Houhou, E. Solano, and M. Paternostro, Quantum simulation of multiphoton and 6 nonlinear dissipative spin-boson models, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032303 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Casanova, R

    J. Casanova, R. Puebla, H. Moya-Cessa, and M. B. Plenio, Connecting nth order generalised quantum Rabi models: emergence of nonlinear spin-boson coupling via spin rotations, npj Quantum Inf. 4, 47 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    C. J. Villas-Boas and D. Z. Rossatto, Multiphoton Jaynes-Cummings model: arbitrary rotations in Fock space and quantum filters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 123604 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Piccione, S

    N. Piccione, S. Felicetti, and B. Bellomo, Two-photon- interaction effects in the bad-cavity limit, Phys. Rev. A 105, L011702 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Q.-H. Chen, C. Wang, S. He, T. Liu, and K.-L. Wang, Exact solvability of the quantum Rabi model using Bo- goliubov operators, Phys. Rev. A 86, 023822 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    R. J. A. Rico, F. H. Maldonado-Villamizar, and B. M. Rodriguez-Lara, Spectral collapse in the two-photon quantum Rabi model, Phys. Rev. A 101, 063825 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Braak, Spectral determinant of the two-photon quan- tum Rabi model, Annalen der Physik 535, 2200519 (2023)

    D. Braak, Spectral determinant of the two-photon quan- tum Rabi model, Annalen der Physik 535, 2200519 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions , second edition, 5th printing ed

    S. Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions , second edition, 5th printing ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Ying, Symmetry-breaking patterns, tricritical ities, and quadruple points in the quantum Rabi model with bias and nonlinear interaction, Phys

    Z.-J. Ying, Symmetry-breaking patterns, tricritical ities, and quadruple points in the quantum Rabi model with bias and nonlinear interaction, Phys. Rev. A 103, 063701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Hammani, Z

    M. Hammani, Z. Sakhi, and M. Bennai, On the two- photon quantum Rabi model at the critical coupling strength, Opt. Quant. Electron 56, 102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Z. Ying, H. Han, B. Li, S. Felicetti, and D. Braak, Crit- ical quantum metrology in a stabilized two-photon Rabi model, Adv. Quantum Tech. , e00263 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    J. Li, D. Braak, and Q.-H. Chen, Critical spectrum of the anisotropic two-photon quantum Rabi model, Phys. Rev. A 111, 043706 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    A. N. Zulli, B. C. Mulkerin, M. M. Parish, and J. Levin- sen, Universal Efimov scaling in the Rabi-coupled few- body spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 053401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    See Supplemental Material for further explanation and details of the calculation, which includes Ref. [45,46]

    work page

  46. [46]

    Y.-F. Xie, L. Duan, and Q.-H. Chen, Quantum Rabi–Stark model: solutions and exotic energy spectra, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 245304 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    C. K. Chan, Bound states of two-photon rabi model at the collapse point, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 385303 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Lambert, E

    N. Lambert, E. Gigu‘ere, P. Menczel, B. Li, P. Hopf, G. Su’arez, M. Gali, J. Lishman, R. Gadhvi, R. Agarwal, A. Galicia, N. Shammah, P. Nation, J. R. Johansson, S. Ahmed, S. Cross, A. Pitchford, and F. Nori, Qutip 5: The quantum toolbox in Python, Phys. Rep. 1153, 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  49. [49]

    Pezz´ e and A

    L. Pezz´ e and A. Smerzi, Entanglement, nonlinear dy- namics, and the Heisenberg limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 100401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    Hauke, M

    P. Hauke, M. Heyl, L. Tagliacozzo, and P. Zoller, Mea- suring multipartite entanglement through dynamic sus- ceptibilities, Nat. Phys. 12, 778 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Garbe, M

    L. Garbe, M. Bina, A. Keller, M. G. Paris, and S. Felicetti, Critical quantum metrology with a finite- component quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 120504 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Y. Chu, S. Zhang, B. Yu, and J. Cai, Dynamic frame- work for criticality-enhanced quantum sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 010502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [54]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid he- lium?, Nature 317, 505 (1985)

    work page 1985

  54. [56]

    Acevedo, L

    O. Acevedo, L. Quiroga, F. Rodr ´ ıguez, and N. John- son, New dynamical scaling universality for quantum net- works across adiabatic quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 030403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  55. [57]

    Defenu, T

    N. Defenu, T. Enss, M. Kastner, and G. Morigi, Dy- namical critical scaling of long-range interacting quan- tum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 240403 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [58]

    Emary and T

    C. Emary and T. Brandes, Quantum chaos triggered by precursors of a quantum phase transition: the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 044101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [59]

    Chen and Y.-Y

    X.-Y. Chen and Y.-Y. Zhang, Finite-size scaling analys is in the two-photon Dicke model, Phys. Rev. A 97, 053821 (2018). Quantum criticality from spectral collapse in the two-phot on Rabi model -Supplementary Material- Jiong Li 1, Jun-ling Wang 2, Qing-Hu Chen 2, 1, 3, ,∗ and Hai-Qing Lin 1, † 1 Institute for Advanced Study in Physics and School of Physic...

    work page 2018

  58. [60]

    This separation of energy scales is the origin of the universal scaling structure

    (S15) The gap within the same parity ǫsp defines the soft mode responsible for the critical behavior, where as the gap between different parities ǫdp arises from symmetry-induced level splitting and does not corresp ond to a critical excitation. This separation of energy scales is the origin of the universal scaling structure. To assess the validity of the ...

    work page

  59. [61]

    Y.-F. Xie, L. Duan, and Q.-H. Chen, Quantum Rabi–Stark mo del: solutions and exotic energy spectra, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 245304 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [62]

    Braak, Spectral determinant of the two-photon quantu m Rabi model, Annalen der Physik 535, 2200519 (2023)

    D. Braak, Spectral determinant of the two-photon quantu m Rabi model, Annalen der Physik 535, 2200519 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [63]

    C. K. Chan, Bound states of two-photon rabi model at the co llapse point, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 385303 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [64]

    J. Li, D. Braak, and Q.-H. Chen, Critical spectrum of the a nisotropic two-photon quantum Rabi model, Phys. Rev. A 111, 043706 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [65]

    A. N. Zulli, B. C. Mulkerin, M. M. Parish, and J. Levinsen, Universal Efimov scaling in the Rabi-coupled few-body spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 053401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [66]

    Ashhab, Superradiance transition in a system with a si ngle qubit and a single oscillator, Phys

    S. Ashhab, Superradiance transition in a system with a si ngle qubit and a single oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 87, 013826 (2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [67]

    Hwang, R

    M.-J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum phase tr ansition and universal dynamics in the Rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015)

    work page 2015

  66. [68]

    Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Adv

    J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Adv. Phys. 59, 1063 (2010)

    work page 2010

  67. [69]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9, 1387 (1976)

    work page 1976

  68. [70]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid hel ium?, Nature 317, 505 (1985)

    work page 1985