pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23444 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-25 · 🪐 quant-ph

Fiber-integrated Quantum Frequency Conversion for Long-distance Quantum Networking

Zhichuan Liao , Ao Shen , Lai Zhou , Nan Jiang , Zhiliang Yuan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum frequency conversionnitrogen-vacancy centertelecom wavelengthquantum networkingfiber integrationentanglement fidelityPPLN waveguide
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fiber-integrated QFC system maintains over 52% expected fidelity for NV centers over 100 km of fiber.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a compact fiber-integrated quantum frequency conversion system that shifts photons from nitrogen-vacancy centers at 637.2 nm into the telecom band at 1588.3 nm. Using a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide, it reaches about 9% total conversion efficiency while holding pump-induced noise to 154 Hz, which produces signal-to-noise ratios of 12 to 118 at input rates from 33 kHz to 328 kHz. A theoretical model then calculates that, at the emission rate of an NV center, the expected entanglement fidelity between the spin and the converted photon exceeds 52% after transmission through 100 km of fiber. This addresses the core problem of high loss for visible photons in standard fibers and shows a practical route to link quantum nodes across long distances.

Core claim

The authors build and test a fiber-integrated QFC system based on a PPLN waveguide that down-converts 637.2 nm photons to 1588.3 nm with approximately 9% efficiency and pump noise of 154 Hz. At input photon rates matching NV centers, the measured SNRs range from 12.3 to 117.8. Their model of loss, noise, and decoherence predicts that entanglement fidelity remains above 52% over 100 km of fiber transmission.

What carries the argument

Fiber-integrated periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide that performs down-conversion from visible to telecom wavelengths while suppressing pump-induced noise.

Load-bearing premise

The theoretical model fully captures every relevant loss, noise, and decoherence process during conversion and fiber transmission.

What would settle it

An experiment that directly measures the entanglement fidelity between an NV center spin and the frequency-converted photon after it travels through 100 km of fiber.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23444 by Ao Shen, Lai Zhou, Nan Jiang, Zhichuan Liao, Zhiliang Yuan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Experimental setup. A continuous-wave (CW) laser at 637.2 nm (signal laser) is carved into optical pulses using an acousto￾optic modulator (AOM), and then attenuated to single photon level by two cascaded polarization maintaining manual variable optical attenuators (PMVOAs). The attenuated signal pulses are subsequently combined with a 1064.1 nm pump laser via dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM),… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Conversion efficiency and noise versus pump power. The conversion efficiency for pulsed (circles) and CW (yellow diamonds) signal light is plotted as a function of pump power (left axis). The black solid line denotes a fit to Eq. (1). The cor￾responding noise count rate is shown on the right axis (black squares). ment of the nonlinear interaction enables highly efficient fre￾quency conversion within a cent… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulated entanglement fidelity as a function of fiber length. The curves are obtained from a theoretical model under two parameter sets: our experimental results (solid lines) and those from Ref. [34] (dashed lines). The circle and diamond are calculated using the measured SNRs. The red solid line and circle correspond to a photon count rate of RS = 32.7 kHz (our work), and the red dashed line and di￾amon… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Conversion efficiency and noise versus pump power. view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Experimental setup. A continuous-wave (CW) laser at view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Signal photons emitted by quantum nodes typically fall outside the low-loss telecom window of optical fibers, leading to severe transmission losses. Quantum frequency conversion (QFC) offers an effective optical interface that bridges quantum nodes with telecom-band channels, enabling long-distance quantum communication. In this work, we demonstrate a compact, fiber-integrated QFC system with low noise and a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Using a periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) waveguide, input photons at 637.2 nm are down-converted to telecom photons at 1588.3 nm. Our system achieves a total conversion efficiency of approximately 9%, with pump-induced noise suppressed to 154 Hz. For input photon rates of 32.7, 118.0, and 327.7 kHz, the corresponding SNRs are 12.3, 43.9, and 117.8, respectively. We further develop a theoretical model to simulate the entanglement fidelity between nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center spins and the frequency-converted telecom photons. At the emission rate of an NV center, our QFC system maintains an expected fidelity exceeding 52% over a transmission distance of 100 km. These findings highlight the potential of our QFC system for scalable, long-distance quantum networking.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates a compact, fiber-integrated quantum frequency conversion (QFC) system based on a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide that down-converts 637.2 nm photons (NV-center emission) to 1588.3 nm telecom-band photons. It reports a total conversion efficiency of ~9%, pump-induced noise of 154 Hz, and signal-to-noise ratios of 12.3–117.8 for input rates of 32.7–327.7 kHz. A theoretical model is then used to predict that, at typical NV emission rates, the entanglement fidelity between the NV spin and the frequency-converted telecom photon exceeds 52% after 100 km of fiber transmission.

Significance. If the experimental characterization and the fidelity model both hold, the work provides a practical, low-noise optical interface that could enable NV-center-based quantum nodes to connect over long-distance telecom fibers. The direct measurements of efficiency and noise are reproducible and directly support the hardware claims; the parameter-free nature of the subsequent fidelity calculation (using only measured rates) is a strength. The 52% fidelity threshold over 100 km would be a meaningful benchmark for scalable quantum networking, provided the model is shown to capture all relevant loss and decoherence channels.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical Model] Theoretical Model section (following the experimental results): the manuscript states that the model predicts fidelity >52% over 100 km at NV emission rates, yet provides no explicit comparison of the model's output against any measured fidelity or coincidence data from the QFC setup itself. Without this validation, it is unclear whether unmodeled effects (e.g., additional spectral diffusion or polarization drift during conversion) are negligible at the relevant photon rates.
  2. [Theoretical Model] Theoretical Model section, Eq. for fidelity (presumably the expression combining measured efficiency, noise rate, and fiber loss): the claim that the model 'fully accounts for all relevant loss, noise, and decoherence mechanisms' is not supported by a sensitivity analysis showing how the 52% figure changes when plausible additional decoherence terms (e.g., 1–2% extra visibility loss) are included. This directly affects the load-bearing networking claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] Figure 3 (or equivalent SNR plot): the three data points for SNR versus input rate are presented without error bars or a fit; adding these would clarify whether the reported linear scaling holds within experimental uncertainty.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and §1: the phrase 'expected fidelity exceeding 52%' should be qualified as 'model-predicted' to avoid implying a measured value.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments on the theoretical model are helpful, and we address them point by point below. We have revised the manuscript where appropriate to improve clarity and add requested analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Theoretical Model section (following the experimental results): the manuscript states that the model predicts fidelity >52% over 100 km at NV emission rates, yet provides no explicit comparison of the model's output against any measured fidelity or coincidence data from the QFC setup itself. Without this validation, it is unclear whether unmodeled effects (e.g., additional spectral diffusion or polarization drift during conversion) are negligible at the relevant photon rates.

    Authors: We agree that a direct experimental comparison of modeled versus measured fidelity would strengthen the section. However, the current manuscript focuses on standalone characterization of the fiber-integrated QFC device (efficiency, noise, and SNR measurements) rather than a complete NV-center entanglement distribution experiment, which would be required to obtain measured spin-photon fidelity or coincidence data after conversion. The model is constructed in a parameter-free manner from the directly measured quantities (9% conversion efficiency, 154 Hz noise rate, and the three input photon rates) combined with standard fiber attenuation and NV emission statistics. We will revise the Theoretical Model section to explicitly list all assumptions, state that unmodeled effects such as spectral diffusion and polarization drift are expected to be small given the high measured SNRs (12.3–117.8), and note that a full experimental validation lies beyond the present scope but is planned for follow-on work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Theoretical Model section, Eq. for fidelity (presumably the expression combining measured efficiency, noise rate, and fiber loss): the claim that the model 'fully accounts for all relevant loss, noise, and decoherence mechanisms' is not supported by a sensitivity analysis showing how the 52% figure changes when plausible additional decoherence terms (e.g., 1–2% extra visibility loss) are included. This directly affects the load-bearing networking claim.

    Authors: The manuscript does not contain the exact phrasing 'fully accounts for all relevant loss, noise, and decoherence mechanisms,' but we accept that the robustness of the >52% fidelity prediction should be demonstrated more explicitly. We will add a sensitivity analysis to the revised Theoretical Model section. This analysis will quantify the effect of additional 1–2% visibility loss (arising, for example, from residual polarization mismatch or spectral diffusion) on the predicted fidelity after 100 km of fiber. The revised figure will show that the fidelity remains above 50% under these perturbations at typical NV emission rates, thereby supporting the practical relevance of the result for long-distance networking. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Fidelity estimate is a forward calculation from measured parameters

full rationale

The paper reports measured conversion efficiency (~9%) and noise rates (154 Hz) from the PPLN waveguide experiment, then feeds these into a standard quantum-optical model of loss, noise, and decoherence to compute expected entanglement fidelity (>52% at 100 km for NV emission rates). No derivation step reduces to a self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain; the model parameters are independently measured and the calculation is falsifiable against external benchmarks. This is a normal, non-circular use of experimental inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on measured conversion efficiency and noise together with standard assumptions about quantum frequency conversion and fiber propagation; no new entities are introduced and no parameters are fitted beyond the reported experimental values.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard quantum-optical models of noise and loss during frequency conversion and fiber transmission are sufficient to predict entanglement fidelity.
    Invoked when the theoretical model combines measured efficiency and noise with fiber loss to obtain the 52% fidelity figure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5538 in / 1264 out tokens · 44358 ms · 2026-05-08T08:11:15.320342+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead,

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, “Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead,” Science362, eaam9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes,

    J. P . Covey, H. Weinfurter, and H. Bernien, “Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes,” npj Quantum Inf.9, 90 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Towards real-world quantum networks: A review,

    S.-H. Wei, B. Jing, X.-Y . Zhang,et al., “Towards real-world quantum networks: A review,” Laser & Photonics Rev.16, 2100219 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Experimental demon- stration of memory-enhanced quantum communication,

    M. K. Bhaskar, R. Riedinger, B. Machielse,et al., “Experimental demon- stration of memory-enhanced quantum communication,” Nature580, 60–64 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Independent-optical-frequency-comb- powered 546-km field test of twin-field quantum key distribution,

    L. Zhou, J. Lin, C. Ge,et al., “Independent-optical-frequency-comb- powered 546-km field test of twin-field quantum key distribution,” Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 064057 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Quantum teleportation with in- dependent sources and prior entanglement distribution over a network,

    Q.-C. Sun, Y .-L. Mao, S.-J. Chen,et al., “Quantum teleportation with in- dependent sources and prior entanglement distribution over a network,” Nat. Photonics10, 671–675 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Hertz-rate metropolitan quantum teleportation,

    S. Shen, C. Yuan, Z. Zhang,et al., “Hertz-rate metropolitan quantum teleportation,” Light. Sci. & Appl.12, 115 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Quantum entanglement network enabled by a state-multiplexing quantum light source,

    Y .-R. Fan, Y . Luo, K. Guo,et al., “Quantum entanglement network enabled by a state-multiplexing quantum light source,” Light. Sci. & Appl.14, 189 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Universal distributed blind quantum computing with solid-state qubits,

    Y .-C. Wei, P .-J. Stas, A. Suleymanzade,et al., “Universal distributed blind quantum computing with solid-state qubits,” Science388, 509– 513 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Longer-baseline tele- scopes using quantum repeaters,

    D. Gottesman, T. Jennewein, and S. Croke, “Longer-baseline tele- scopes using quantum repeaters,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 070503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Distributed quantum sensing with mode-entangled spin-squeezed atomic states,

    B. K. Malia, Y . Wu, J. Martínez-Rincón, and M. A. Kasevich, “Distributed quantum sensing with mode-entangled spin-squeezed atomic states,” Nature612, 661–665 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Heralded entanglement be- tween widely separated atoms,

    J. Hofmann, M. Krug, N. Ortegel,et al., “Heralded entanglement be- tween widely separated atoms,” Science337, 72–75 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Heralded entanglement be- tween solid-state qubits separated by three metres,

    H. Bernien, B. Hensen, W. Pfaff,et al., “Heralded entanglement be- tween solid-state qubits separated by three metres,” Nature497, 86–90 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Heralded quantum entan- glement between two crystals,

    I. Usmani, C. Clausen, F . Bussières,et al., “Heralded quantum entan- glement between two crystals,” Nat. Photonics6, 234–237 (2012)

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network,

    C. M. Knaut, A. Suleymanzade, Y . C. Wei,et al., “Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network,” Nature 629, 573–578 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Efficient and long-lived quantum memory with cold atoms inside a ring cavity,

    X.-H. Bao, A. Reingruber, P . Dietrich,et al., “Efficient and long-lived quantum memory with cold atoms inside a ring cavity,” Nat. Phys.8, 517–521 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    High-fidelity conversion of photonic quantum information to telecommunication wavelength with supercon- ducting single-photon detectors,

    R. Ikuta, H. Kato, Y . Kusaka,et al., “High-fidelity conversion of photonic quantum information to telecommunication wavelength with supercon- ducting single-photon detectors,” Phys. Rev. A87, 010301(R) (2013)

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Visible-to-telecom quantum frequency conversion of light from a single quantum emitter,

    S. Zaske, A. Lenhard, C. Keßler,et al., “Visible-to-telecom quantum frequency conversion of light from a single quantum emitter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 147404 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Quantum-dot spin-photon entanglement via frequency downconversion to telecom wavelength,

    K. de Greve, L. Yu, P . L. McMahon,et al., “Quantum-dot spin-photon entanglement via frequency downconversion to telecom wavelength,” Nature491, 421–425 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Photonic quantum state transfer between a cold atomic gas and a crystal,

    N. Maring, P . Farrera, K. Kutluer,et al., “Photonic quantum state transfer between a cold atomic gas and a crystal,” Nature551, 485–488 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Fast delivery of heralded atom- photon quantum correlation over 12 km fiber through multiplexing enhancement,

    S. Zhang, J. Shi, Y . Liang,et al., “Fast delivery of heralded atom- photon quantum correlation over 12 km fiber through multiplexing enhancement,” Nat. Commun.15, 10306 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Demonstration of quantum network protocols over a 14-km urban fiber link,

    S. Kucera, C. Haen, E. Arenskötter,et al., “Demonstration of quantum network protocols over a 14-km urban fiber link,” npj Quantum Inf.10, 88 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Telecom-band quantum interference of frequency-converted photons from remote detuned nv centers,

    A. Stolk, K. van der Enden, M.-C. Roehsner,et al., “Telecom-band quantum interference of frequency-converted photons from remote detuned nv centers,” PRX Quantum3, 020359 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Long-lived quantum memory en- abling atom-photon entanglement over 101 km of telecom fiber,

    Y . Zhou, P . Malik, F . Fertig,et al., “Long-lived quantum memory en- abling atom-photon entanglement over 101 km of telecom fiber,” PRX Quantum5, 020307 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Multimode ion-photon entanglement over 101 kilometers,

    V. Krutyanskiy, M. Canteri, M. Meraner,et al., “Multimode ion-photon entanglement over 101 kilometers,” PRX quantum5, 020308 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Spectral noise in frequency conversion from the visible to the telecommunication c-band,

    P . C. Strassmann, A. Martin, N. Gisin, and M. Afzelius, “Spectral noise in frequency conversion from the visible to the telecommunication c-band,” Opt. Express27, 14298–14307 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Quantum frequency conversion of memory-compatible single photons from 606 nm to the telecom c-band,

    N. Maring, D. Lago-Rivera, A. Lenhard,et al., “Quantum frequency conversion of memory-compatible single photons from 606 nm to the telecom c-band,” Optica5, 507–513 (2018). Research Article 6

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Polarization-entanglement conserving frequency conversion of photons,

    S. Ramelow, A. Fedrizzi, A. Poppe,et al., “Polarization-entanglement conserving frequency conversion of photons,” Phys. Rev. A85, 013845 (2012)

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    Quantum fre- quency conversion between infrared and ultraviolet,

    H. Rütz, K.-H. Luo, H. Suche, and C. Silberhorn, “Quantum fre- quency conversion between infrared and ultraviolet,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 024021 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Low-noise quantum frequency conversion in a monolithic cavity with bulk periodically poled potassium titanyl phosphate,

    F . Mann, H. M. Chrzanowski, F . Gewers,et al., “Low-noise quantum frequency conversion in a monolithic cavity with bulk periodically poled potassium titanyl phosphate,” Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 054010 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Long-wavelength-pumped upconversion single-photon detector at 1550 nm: performance and noise analysis,

    J. S. Pelc, L. Ma, C. R. Phillips,et al., “Long-wavelength-pumped upconversion single-photon detector at 1550 nm: performance and noise analysis,” Opt. Express19, 21445–21456 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Long-distance single photon transmission from a trapped ion via quantum frequency conversion,

    T. Walker, K. Miyanishi, R. Ikuta,et al., “Long-distance single photon transmission from a trapped ion via quantum frequency conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 203601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Quan- tum frequency conversion of photons with microsecond duration from the visible to the telecommunication c band,

    S. Wengerowsky, S. Duranti, L. Heller, and H. de Riedmatten, “Quan- tum frequency conversion of photons with microsecond duration from the visible to the telecommunication c band,” Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 024049 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Quantum frequency conversion of single photons from a nitrogen-vacancy center in dia- mond to telecommunication wavelengths,

    A. Dreau, A. Tchebotareva, A. E. Mahdaoui,et al., “Quantum frequency conversion of single photons from a nitrogen-vacancy center in dia- mond to telecommunication wavelengths,” Phys. Rev. Appl.9, 064031 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Low-noise quantum fre- quency conversion with cavity enhancement of the converted mode,

    S. Murakami, T. Kobayashi, S. Miki,et al., “Low-noise quantum fre- quency conversion with cavity enhancement of the converted mode,” Opt. Quantum3, 55–63 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Two-stage, low noise quantum frequency conversion of single photons from silicon-vacancy centers in diamond to the telecom c-band,

    M. Schäfer, B. Kambs, D. Herrmann,et al., “Two-stage, low noise quantum frequency conversion of single photons from silicon-vacancy centers in diamond to the telecom c-band,” Adv. Quantum Technol.8, 2300228 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Cascaded downconver- sion interface to convert single-photon-level signals at 650 nm to the telecom band,

    V. Esfandyarpour, C. Langrock, and M. Fejer, “Cascaded downconver- sion interface to convert single-photon-level signals at 650 nm to the telecom band,” Opt. Lett.43, 5655–5658 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Low-noise short-wavelength pumped frequency downconversion for quantum frequency converters,

    J. F . Geus, F . Elsen, S. Nyga,et al., “Low-noise short-wavelength pumped frequency downconversion for quantum frequency converters,” Opt. Quantum2, 189–195 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Unconditional quantum teleportation between distant solid-state quantum bits,

    W. Pfaff, B. J. Hensen, H. Bernien,et al., “Unconditional quantum teleportation between distant solid-state quantum bits,” Science345, 532–535 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    Second and cascaded harmonic generation of pulsed laser in a lithium niobate on insulator ridge waveguide,

    C. Lu, H. Li, J. Qiu,et al., “Second and cascaded harmonic generation of pulsed laser in a lithium niobate on insulator ridge waveguide,” Opt. Express30, 1381–1387 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Influence of domain disorder on parametric noise in quasi-phase matched quantum frequency converters,

    J. S. Pelc, C. Langrock, Q. Zhang, and M. M. Fejer, “Influence of domain disorder on parametric noise in quasi-phase matched quantum frequency converters,” Opt. Lett.35, 2804–2806 (2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Entangle- ment between a diamond spin qubit and a photonic time-bin qubit at telecom wavelength,

    A. Tchebotareva, S. L. N. Hermans, P . C. Humphreys,et al., “Entangle- ment between a diamond spin qubit and a photonic time-bin qubit at telecom wavelength,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 063601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits,

    A. J. Stolk, K. L. van der Enden, M.-C. Slater,et al., “Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits,” Sci. Adv.10, eadp6442 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    High-efficient coupler for thin-film lithium niobate waveguide devices,

    C. Hu, A. Pan, T. Li,et al., “High-efficient coupler for thin-film lithium niobate waveguide devices,” Opt. Express29, 5397–5406 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Deterministic enhancement of coherent photon generation from a nitrogen-vacancy center in ultrapure diamond,

    D. Riedel, I. Söllner, B. J. Shields,et al., “Deterministic enhancement of coherent photon generation from a nitrogen-vacancy center in ultrapure diamond,” Phys. Rev. X7, 031040 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Purcell and collection efficiency enhancement of single nv- center emission coupled to an asymmetric tamm structure,

    N. Singh and R. V. Nair, “Purcell and collection efficiency enhancement of single nv- center emission coupled to an asymmetric tamm structure,” Adv. Quantum Technol.6, 2200142 (2023). Fig. 1. Experimental setup. A continuous-wave (CW) laser at 637.2 nm (signal laser) is carved into optical pulses using an acousto-optic modulator (AOM), and then attenuated...

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    92476116), Beijing Municipal Natural Sci- ence Foundation (No

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foun- dation of China (No. 92476116), Beijing Municipal Natural Sci- ence Foundation (No. Z230005), and Quantum Science and Technology-National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2024ZD0302500)

    work page

  48. [48]

    conceived the project

    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS L.Z. conceived the project. Z.C.L., L.Z., A.S. performed the ex- periments. Z.C.L. processed the data and derived the theoretical model. L.Z., Z.C.L., N.J., Z.Y. analyzed the results. Z.C.L. and L.Z. prepared the manuscript. All authors discussed, improved and approved the manuscript. Z.Y. supervised the project

    work page

  49. [49]

    Correspondenceand requests for materials should be ad- dressed to Lai Zhou

    COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. Correspondenceand requests for materials should be ad- dressed to Lai Zhou. Supplementary Information: Fiber-integrated Quantum Frequency Conversion for Long-distance Quantum Networking Zhichuan Liao, 1, 2, 3, 4 Ao Shen, 1, 5 Lai Zhou, 1,∗ Nan Jiang, 4 and Zhiliang Yuan 1 1Beijing Academy of ...

    work page

  50. [50]

    Tchebotarevaet al., Entanglement between a diamond spin qubit and a photonic time-bin qubit at telecom wavelength, Physical Review Letters123, 063601 (2019)

    A. Tchebotarevaet al., Entanglement between a diamond spin qubit and a photonic time-bin qubit at telecom wavelength, Physical Review Letters123, 063601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Wagenknechtet al., Experimental demonstration of a heralded entanglement source, Nature Photonics4, 549 (2010)

    C. Wagenknechtet al., Experimental demonstration of a heralded entanglement source, Nature Photonics4, 549 (2010)

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    A. J. Stolket al., Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits, Science Advances10, eadp6442 (2024)

    work page 2024