pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23521 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Cosolvency response in polymer brushes

Huaisong Yong , Binyu Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords cosolvencypolymer brushesanalytic theoryreentrant transitionspreferential adsorptionχ-functionfree-energy modelstimulus-responsive materials
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Preferential cosolvent adsorption induces effective monomer repulsions that produce discontinuous swelling followed by re-collapse in polymer brushes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs the first closed-form analytic theory for how polymer brushes exhibit cosolvency, the phenomenon in which chains that are insoluble in either of two pure solvents become soluble in specific mixtures of those solvents. It shows that this behavior emerges because cosolvent molecules adsorb preferentially onto the chains, creating an effective repulsion between segments that have taken up different solvents. This repulsion is captured by a concentration-dependent interaction parameter that drives a sudden transition to a swollen state at moderate cosolvent levels and then a re-collapse at higher levels. The same minimal free-energy framework for symmetric poor solvents reveals that both the swelling and re-collapse transitions arise from one underlying thermodynamic balance. The work also demonstrates that repulsive forces between the two solvents in the surrounding liquid are not required for cosolvency to occur.

Core claim

Preferential adsorption of cosolvent induces an effective repulsion between monomers solvated by cosolvent and those solvated by solvent. The equilibrium solvation of polymer chains by cosolvent gives rise to a concentration-dependent χ-function, which captures the effective interactions within the brush and reproduces the reentrant behavior characteristic of the cosolvency effect. The model predicts a discontinuous soluble transition followed by a re-collapse transition at higher cosolvent concentrations. Analytical treatment within a minimal free-energy model for the case of two symmetric poor solvents shows that the swelling and re-collapse transitions share the same thermodynamic origin.

What carries the argument

The concentration-dependent χ-function generated by equilibrium solvation of monomers, which encodes the effective repulsion arising from preferential cosolvent adsorption inside a minimal free-energy model for symmetric poor solvents.

Load-bearing premise

The preferential adsorption of cosolvent must be strong enough to generate a repulsive coupling between monomers carrying different solvents that is not canceled by other interactions.

What would settle it

Experimental observation that the brush height changes continuously rather than discontinuously with increasing cosolvent concentration, or that re-collapse fails to appear at high concentrations while the low-concentration swelling still occurs, would falsify the predicted transitions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23521 by Binyu Zhao, Huaisong Yong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic illustration of the preferential-solvation effect of cosolvent on polymer brush chains. In the figure, green lines represent polymer chains, filled blue circles represent adsorbed cosolvent, and filled pink circles represent adsorbed common solvent. Dashed arrows indicate non-specific short-range interactions. For simplicity, non-adsorbed solvent molecules in the background are represented by o… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Based on Equation(11), the external adsorption field U is plotted as a function of the monomer volume fraction (c) for ε2 = 0.15, ε3 = 0.55, and σ = 0.15. In panel (a): an example of using the Maxwell construction to determine the true equilibrium states in the phase transition of polymer brushes for the model parameters χs = 0.3 and ε1 = 1. The equilibrium states in panel (a) are indicated by filled circl… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first analytic theory with elegant and closed-form analytical solutions to explore the cosolvency effect in polymer brushes, where polymer chains that are poorly soluble in two pure solvents become fully soluble in certain mixtures thereof. This effect is key to designing stimulus-responsive smart materials but has not previously been addressed by analytic theory for polymer brushes. Our theoretical framework reveals that preferential adsorption of cosolvent induces an effective repulsion between monomers solvated by cosolvent and those solvated by solvent. The equilibrium solvation of polymer chains by cosolvent gives rise to a concentration-dependent $\chi$-function, which captures the effective interactions within the brush and reproduces the reentrant behavior characteristic of the cosolvency effect. The model predicts a discontinuous soluble transition followed by a re-collapse transition at higher cosolvent concentrations. Analytical treatment within a minimal free-energy model for the case of two symmetric poor solvents shows that the swelling and re-collapse transitions share the same thermodynamic origin. For low-density brushes, we derive an analytical approximation and delineate the phase diagram of parameter space in which discontinuous transitions occur. For cosolvency to take place, the theory specifies a minimum strength for preferential solvation and the associated repulsive coupling. Furthermore, it demonstrates that, contrary to previous models, repulsive interactions between cosolvent and solvent in the bulk are not required. This work lays the groundwork for the rational design of smart stimulus-responsive materials based on the cosolvency effect in polymer brushes, a capability which was not previously established.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first analytic theory for the cosolvency effect in polymer brushes, employing a minimal free-energy model with closed-form analytical solutions. Preferential adsorption of cosolvent is shown to induce an effective repulsion between differently solvated monomers, yielding a concentration-dependent χ-function that reproduces reentrant swelling. For two symmetric poor solvents the model predicts a discontinuous soluble transition followed by re-collapse at higher cosolvent concentrations, with both transitions sharing the same thermodynamic origin. Analytical approximations are derived for low-density brushes, the phase diagram in parameter space is delineated, and it is argued that bulk cosolvent-solvent repulsion is unnecessary provided a minimum preferential-solvation strength is satisfied.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies the first closed-form analytic treatment of cosolvency specifically for polymer brushes, together with explicit conditions for discontinuous transitions and the demonstration that bulk repulsion is not required. These features would be useful for the rational design of stimulus-responsive materials. The shared thermodynamic origin of the swelling and re-collapse transitions is a noteworthy claim if the free-energy landscape is shown to produce it without additional tuning.

major comments (3)
  1. [Minimal free-energy model] Minimal free-energy model: the statement that preferential adsorption 'induces an effective repulsion' between cosolvent-solvated and solvent-solvated monomers must be derived explicitly from the underlying solvation equilibrium (partition functions or lattice statistics). It is not clear whether this cross-term arises strictly as a consequence of the model or is introduced as an additional modeling choice; this step is load-bearing for the concentration-dependent χ(φ) and for the claim that bulk repulsion is unnecessary.
  2. [Analytical treatment for symmetric poor solvents] Analytical treatment for symmetric poor solvents: the minimum preferential-solvation strength required for cosolvency to occur is specified by the theory itself. The phase diagram and the existence of the discontinuous transitions therefore appear to depend on this parameter being above a threshold chosen to produce reentrant behavior; the robustness of the first-order jumps and the shared-origin claim to variations around this threshold should be demonstrated explicitly.
  3. [Low-density brushes approximation] Low-density brushes approximation: the analytic approximation and the delineated phase diagram must include verification that the reported discontinuities are not artifacts of the low-density limit or of the symmetric-solvent assumption. Explicit comparison of the approximate free-energy landscape with the full numerical minimization would strengthen the central predictions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract describes the solutions as 'elegant'; this is subjective and should be replaced by a statement of the mathematical form (e.g., 'closed-form expressions in terms of the preferential-solvation parameter').
  2. [Model definition] Notation for the concentration-dependent χ-function and the repulsive coupling should be introduced with a clear equation reference at first use to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript on the analytic theory of cosolvency in polymer brushes. We address each major comment below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the derivations, robustness checks, and comparisons as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Minimal free-energy model: the statement that preferential adsorption 'induces an effective repulsion' between cosolvent-solvated and solvent-solvated monomers must be derived explicitly from the underlying solvation equilibrium (partition functions or lattice statistics). It is not clear whether this cross-term arises strictly as a consequence of the model or is introduced as an additional modeling choice; this step is load-bearing for the concentration-dependent χ(φ) and for the claim that bulk repulsion is unnecessary.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is essential for clarity. The effective cross-repulsion term arises directly from the solvation equilibrium: each monomer can occupy one of two states (solvated by solvent or by cosolvent), with statistical weights determined by the preferential adsorption energy. The free-energy contribution from these states, when minimized with respect to the local solvation fraction, produces the cross-term between differently solvated monomers without any additional ad hoc interaction. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection that starts from the single-monomer partition function, derives the mean-field free energy, and shows how the concentration-dependent χ(φ) follows. This derivation confirms that bulk solvent-cosolvent repulsion is not required; the effective repulsion is generated solely by the differential solvation statistics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Analytical treatment for symmetric poor solvents: the minimum preferential-solvation strength required for cosolvency to occur is specified by the theory itself. The phase diagram and the existence of the discontinuous transitions therefore appear to depend on this parameter being above a threshold chosen to produce reentrant behavior; the robustness of the first-order jumps and the shared-origin claim to variations around this threshold should be demonstrated explicitly.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important point on robustness. The minimum preferential-solvation strength is indeed an intrinsic threshold of the model, below which the reentrant behavior disappears. In the revision we will expand the phase diagram to include several values of the preferential-solvation parameter above this threshold. We will show that the discontinuous swelling and re-collapse transitions, together with the shared thermodynamic origin (both arising from the same non-monotonic free-energy landscape), remain stable over a finite interval of the parameter. Only when the strength falls below the threshold do the jumps become continuous; this behavior will be illustrated by additional free-energy plots at representative points. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Low-density brushes approximation: the analytic approximation and the delineated phase diagram must include verification that the reported discontinuities are not artifacts of the low-density limit or of the symmetric-solvent assumption. Explicit comparison of the approximate free-energy landscape with the full numerical minimization would strengthen the central predictions.

    Authors: We agree that direct numerical verification is valuable. We have carried out full numerical minimization of the complete free-energy functional (without the low-density expansion) for both symmetric and mildly asymmetric solvent pairs. These calculations confirm that the discontinuous transitions persist in the same parameter region identified by the analytic approximation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated comparison figure that overlays the analytic free-energy curves with the numerically minimized landscapes, demonstrating that the locations and character of the jumps are not artifacts of the low-density or symmetry assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Minimal free-energy model's induced repulsion and χ(φ) are introduced by construction to produce reentrant transitions, rendering the shared thermodynamic origin and discontinuous soluble jump definitional.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "Our theoretical framework reveals that preferential adsorption of cosolvent induces an effective repulsion between monomers solvated by cosolvent and those solvated by solvent. The equilibrium solvation of polymer chains by cosolvent gives rise to a concentration-dependent χ-function, which captures the effective interactions within the brush and reproduces the reentrant behavior characteristic of the cosolvency effect."

    The minimal free-energy model is constructed with solvation states and interaction terms that directly implement this repulsion and χ(φ) dependence; the 'revelation' and reproduction of reentrant behavior therefore follow tautologically from the model's definition rather than emerging from an independent lattice or partition-function derivation.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "For cosolvency to take place, the theory specifies a minimum strength for preferential solvation and the associated repulsive coupling. Furthermore, it demonstrates that, contrary to previous models, repulsive interactions between cosolvent and solvent in the bulk are not required."

    The minimum preferential-solvation strength is the threshold value inside the model's parameter space that generates the target discontinuous transition and re-collapse; specifying it as a 'requirement' and claiming bulk repulsion is unnecessary simply restates the model's own assumptions and omissions.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation begins with a minimal free-energy model whose solvation equilibria and cross terms are chosen to encode preferential adsorption as an effective monomer repulsion and a concentration-dependent χ. Analytic solutions then recover the reentrant behavior and shared origin of swelling/re-collapse as direct consequences of that functional form. The 'minimum strength' condition for cosolvency is the model's own parameter threshold for non-monotonicity rather than an independent prediction. While the closed-form expressions for low-density brushes have mathematical value, the load-bearing physical claims reduce to the model's ansatz without external microscopic justification or falsifiable benchmark outside the fitted regime.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The theory rests on a minimal free-energy model with preferential solvation as the driver of effective monomer repulsion and a derived concentration-dependent interaction parameter. No new physical entities are introduced beyond effective interactions.

free parameters (1)
  • preferential solvation strength
    Minimum value required for cosolvency to occur, along with associated repulsive coupling, as specified by the theory for the effect to take place.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Minimal free-energy model for symmetric poor solvents
    Invoked to demonstrate that swelling and re-collapse transitions share the same thermodynamic origin.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5557 in / 1205 out tokens · 75039 ms · 2026-05-08T05:20:13.452576+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Narayanan, A

    T. Narayanan, A. Kumar, Reentrant phase transitions in multicomponent liquid mixtures, Physics Reports, 249 (1994) 135-218

    1994

  2. [2]

    H. -X. Zhou, D. Kota, S. Qin, R. Prasad, Fundamental Aspects of Phase -Separated Biomolecular Condensates, Chemical Reviews, 124 (2024) 8550−8595

    2024

  3. [3]

    Pappu, S.R

    R.V. Pappu, S.R. Cohen, M.F. Furqan Dar, M. Kar, Phase Transitions of Associative Biomacromolecules, Chemical Reviews, 123 (2023) 8945−8987

    2023

  4. [4]

    Gama, R.C.V

    M.M.T.d. Gama, R.C.V. Coelho, Phase Separation in Mixtures of Nematic and Isotropic Fluids, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 17 (2026) 115–135

    2026

  5. [5]

    Zhang, R

    Q. Zhang, R. Hoogenboom, Polymers with upper critical solution temperature behavior in alcohol/water solvent mixtures, Progress in Polymer Science, 48 (2015) 122-142

    2015

  6. [6]

    Bharadwaj, B.-J

    S. Bharadwaj, B.-J. Niebuur, K. Nothdurft, W. Richtering, N.F.A.v.d. Vegt, C.M. Papadakis, 26 Cononsolvency of thermoresponsive polymers: where we are now and where we are going, Soft Matter, 18 (2022) 2884-2909

    2022

  7. [7]

    Mukherji, C.M

    D. Mukherji, C.M. Marques, K. Kremer, Smart Responsive Polymers: Fundamentals and Design Principles, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 11 (2020) 271–299

    2020

  8. [8]

    Wolf, R.J

    B.A. Wolf, R.J. Molinari, True cosolvency. Acetone/diethylether/polystyrene, Die Makromolekulare Chemie, 173 (1973) 241-245

    1973

  9. [9]

    Chowdhury, B

    P. Chowdhury, B. Saha, K. Bauri, B.S. Sumerlin, P. De, Upper Critical Solution Temperature (UCST) Behavior of Pyroglutamate -Functionalized Non-Ionic Homopolymers: Cosolvency in Water/Alcohol Binary Solutions, Polymer Chemistry, 17 (2026) 444-455

    2026

  10. [10]

    Nakamura, K

    K. Nakamura, K. Yano, S. Ida, D. Ida, A. Ryoki, S. Yamamoto, T. Terashima, S. Kanaoka, Solution Properties of Amphiphilic Alternating Copolymers of N -Ethylmaleimide and 2 - Hydroxyethyl Vinyl Ether: Thermoresponsiveness in Alcohols and Cosolvency Phenomenon in Binary Ethanol/Water Solutions, Macromolecules, 57 (2024) 4439–4447

    2024

  11. [11]

    X. Ma, P. Du, B. Niu, J. Zhang, H. Yong, X. He, LCST/UCST transition of acrylate copolymer with cosolvency behaviors in alcohol aqueous solutions, Journal of Molecular Liquids, 375 (2023) 121305

    2023

  12. [12]

    Asadujjaman, V

    A. Asadujjaman, V. Ahmadi, M. Yalcin, N. ten Brummelhuis, A. Bertin, Thermoresponsive functional polymers based on 2,6 -diaminopyridine motif with tunable UCST behaviour in water/alcohol mixtures, Polymer Chemistry, 8 (2017) 3140-3153

    2017

  13. [13]

    Hoogenboom, C.R

    R. Hoogenboom, C.R. Becer, C. Guerrero-Sanchez, S. Hoeppener, U.S. Schubert, Solubility and Thermoresponsiveness of PMMA in Alcohol -Water Solvent Mixtures, Australian Journal of Chemistry, 63 (2010) 1173-1178

    2010

  14. [14]

    Takasu, N

    K. Takasu, N. Inaba, S. Takeuchi, K. Matsuoka, K. Sada, Cosolvency -Induced UCST/LCST Dual Phase Separation of Poly(2 -hydroxyethyl methacrylate) in Nonaqueous Organic Solvent Mixtures, Macromolecules 58 (2025) 9055–9063

    2025

  15. [15]

    S. Li, L. Feng, H. Lu, S. Feng, From LCST to UCST: the phase separation behaviour of thermo-responsive polysiloxanes with the solubility parameters of solvents, New Journal of Chemistry, 41 (2017) 1997-2003

    2017

  16. [16]

    Lee, Y.C

    S.M. Lee, Y.C. Bae, A cosolvency effect on tunable thermosensitive core–shell nanoparticle gels, Soft Matter, 11 (2015) 3936-3945

    2015

  17. [17]

    Auroy, L

    P. Auroy, L. Auvray, Preferential solvation in poly(styrene) brushes, Langmuir, 10 (1994) 225–231

    1994

  18. [18]

    Celda, A

    B. Celda, A. Campos, R. Tejero, J.E. Figueruelo, Cosolvency in n -alkane-butanone-poly (dimethylsiloxane) systems, European Polymer Journal, 22 (1986) 129-135

    1986

  19. [19]

    Zhang, D

    X. Zhang, D. Meng, A Generic Explanation of the Mechanism of Co -solvency, ArXiv Preprints, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08688(2025)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08688(2025 2025

  20. [20]

    Zhang, Phase Separation of Homopolymers in Binary Mixed Solvents: the Co -Solvency Effect, Macromolecules, 58 (2025) 2472–2483

    P. Zhang, Phase Separation of Homopolymers in Binary Mixed Solvents: the Co -Solvency Effect, Macromolecules, 58 (2025) 2472–2483. 27

    2025

  21. [21]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. Zong, D. Meng, General Condition for Polymer Cononsolvency in Binary Mixed Solvents, Macromolecules, 57 (2024) 8632–8642

    2024

  22. [22]

    R. Xiao, J. Qian, S. Qu, Modeling Gel Swelling in Binary Solvents: A Thermodynamic Approach to Explaining Cosolvency and Cononsolvency Effects, International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 11 (2019) 1950050

    2019

  23. [23]

    Dudowicz, K.F

    J. Dudowicz, K.F. Freed, J.F. Douglas, Communication: Cosolvency and cononsolvency explained in terms of a Flory -Huggins type theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143 (2015)

    2015

  24. [24]

    Flory, Thermodynamics of High Polymer Solutions, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 10 (1942) 51–61

    P.J. Flory, Thermodynamics of High Polymer Solutions, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 10 (1942) 51–61

    1942

  25. [25]

    Huggins, Solutions of Long Chain Compounds, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 9 (1941) 440-440

    M.L. Huggins, Solutions of Long Chain Compounds, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 9 (1941) 440-440

    1941

  26. [26]

    Z. Qiao, H. Wu, J. Zhou, Co -solvency phenomenon and thermodynamic mechanism of cyanoethyl cellulose in acetone -water binary solvent, Carbohydrate Polymers, 381 (2026) 125221

    2026

  27. [27]

    C. Saha, X. Zhang, M.M. Huda, N. Rai, D. Meng, Solvation-Solvophobicity Interplay Drives Reentrant Swelling of Polymers in Poor Solvent Mixtures, Preprint, DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs - 7235615/v1(2025)

    work page doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs 2025

  28. [28]

    J. Wang, Y. Qian, L. Li, X. Qiu, Atomic Force Microscopy and Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Study of Lignin Solution Self-Assembly Mechanisms in Organic –Aqueous Solvent Mixtures, ChemSusChem, 13 (2020) 4420-4427

    2020

  29. [29]

    Heyda, A

    J. Heyda, A. Muzdalo, J. Dzubiella, Rationalizing Polymer Swelling and Collapse under Attractive Cosolvent Conditions, Macromolecules, 46 (2013) 1231-1238

    2013

  30. [30]

    Gargallo, D

    L. Gargallo, D. Radic, Polymer Solution Behavior: Polymer in Pure Solvent and in Mixed Solvent, Physicochemical Behavior and Supramolecular Organization of Polymers, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009

    2009

  31. [31]

    Gargallo, D

    L. Gargallo, D. Radić, Preferential adsorption of vinyl polymers in binary solvents, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 21 (1984) 1-53

    1984

  32. [32]

    B.A. Wolf, G. Blaum, Measured and calculated solubility of polymers in mixed solvents: Monotony and cosolvency, Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics Edition, 13 (1975) 1115-1132

    1975

  33. [33]

    Y. Wu, Y. Shen, J. Han, P. Théato, X. Le, T. Chen, Brush -Like Polymeric Gels Enabled Photonic Crystals toward Ultrasensitive Cosolvent Chromism, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 63 (2024) e202414136

    2024

  34. [34]

    S. Tas, M. Kopeć, R.v.d. Pol, M. Cirelli, I.d. Vries, D.A. Bölükbas, K. Tempelman, N.E. Benes, M.A. Hempenius, G.J. Vancso, S.d. Beer, Chain End -Functionalized Polymer Brushes with Switchable Fluorescence Response, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics , 220 (2019) 1800537. 28

    2019

  35. [35]

    Y. Yu, B.D. Kieviet, E. Kutnyanszky, G.J. Vancso, S.d. Beer, Cosolvency-Induced Switching of the Adhesion between Poly(methyl methacrylate) Brushes, ACS Macro Letters, 4 (2015) 75–79

    2015

  36. [36]

    Satyanarayana, P.R

    D. Satyanarayana, P.R. Chatterji, Swelling characteristics of amphiphilic polymer brushes in pure and mixed solvent systems, Polymer, 34 (1993) 3682-3686

    1993

  37. [37]

    Prolongo, R.M

    M.G. Prolongo, R.M. Masegosa, I. Hernández -Fuentes, A. Horta, Cosolvency, coil expansion and dimensions of PMMA in mixed solvents, Polymer, 25 (1984) 1307 -1313

    1984

  38. [38]

    Fernández-Piérola, A

    I. Fernández-Piérola, A. Horta, Cosolvents of PMMA, Die Makromolekulare Chemie, 182 (1981) 1705-1714

    1981

  39. [39]

    de Gennes, Conformations of Polymers Attached to an Interface, Macromolecules, 13 (1980) 1069–1075

    P.-G. de Gennes, Conformations of Polymers Attached to an Interface, Macromolecules, 13 (1980) 1069–1075

    1980

  40. [40]

    Alexander, Adsorption of chain molecules with a polar head a scaling description, Journal de Physique, 38 (1977) 983-987

    S. Alexander, Adsorption of chain molecules with a polar head a scaling description, Journal de Physique, 38 (1977) 983-987

    1977

  41. [41]

    Binder, A

    K. Binder, A. Milchev, Polymer brushes on flat and curved surfaces: How computer simulations can help to test theories and to interpret experiments, Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 50 (2012) 1515–1555

    2012

  42. [42]

    de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1979

    P.-G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1979

    1979

  43. [43]

    Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics, Academic Press, London, England, 1982

    R.J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics, Academic Press, London, England, 1982

    1982

  44. [44]

    Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Reprint Edition), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1987

    H.E. Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Reprint Edition), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1987

    1987

  45. [45]

    H. Yong, H. Merlitz, An Analytical Understanding of Reentrant Condensation of a Polyelectrolyte in the Presence of an Oppositely Charged Surfactant, Langmuir, 41 (2025) 19683–19697

    2025

  46. [46]

    H. Yong, C. Luo, Analytical insights into the phase transition of polyelectrolyte brushes induced by an oppositely charged surfactant, In Peer Review, DOI (2026) 1-42

    2026

  47. [47]

    Yong, Reentrant Condensation of Polyelectrolytes Induced by Diluted Multivalent Salts: The Role of Electrostatic Gluonic Effects, Biomacromolecules, 25 (2024) 7361 –7376

    H. Yong, Reentrant Condensation of Polyelectrolytes Induced by Diluted Multivalent Salts: The Role of Electrostatic Gluonic Effects, Biomacromolecules, 25 (2024) 7361 –7376

    2024

  48. [48]

    H. Yong, J. -U. Sommer, Cononsolvency Effect: When the Hydrogen Bonding between a Polymer and a Cosolvent Matters, Macromolecules, 55 (2022) 11034-11050

    2022

  49. [49]

    Sommer, Gluonic and regulatory solvents and another type of LCST -transition, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 164 (2026) 064912

    J.-U. Sommer, Gluonic and regulatory solvents and another type of LCST -transition, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 164 (2026) 064912

    2026

  50. [50]

    Muthukumar, Physics of Charged Macromolecules: Synthetic and Biological Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023

    M. Muthukumar, Physics of Charged Macromolecules: Synthetic and Biological Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023

    2023

  51. [51]

    Cowie, I.J

    J.M.G. Cowie, I.J. McEwen, Polymer-cosolvent systems: 6. Phase behaviour of polystyrene in binary mixed solvents of acetone with n -alkanes-examples of ‘classic cosolvency’, Polymer, 24 (1983) 1449-1452. 29

    1983

  52. [52]

    Knychała, K

    P. Knychała, K. Timachova, M. Banaszak, N.P. Balsara, 50th Anniversary Perspective: Phase Behavior of Polymer Solutions and Blends, Macromolecules, 50 (2017) 3051 –3065

    2017

  53. [53]

    Zhang, B

    P. Zhang, B. Li, Q. Wang, Quantitative Study of Fluctuation Effects by Fast Lattice Monte Carlo Simulations. III. Homopolymer Brushes in an Explicit Solvent, Macromolecules, 45 (2012) 2537–2550

    2012

  54. [54]

    G.-L. He, H. Merlitz, J. -U. Sommer, C. -X. Wu, Static and Dynamic Properties of Polymer Brushes at Moderate and High Grafting Densities: A Molecular Dynamics Study, Macromolecules, 40 (2007) 6721–6730

    2007

  55. [55]

    de Gennes, A second type of phase separation in polymer solutions, Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences

    P.-G. de Gennes, A second type of phase separation in polymer solutions, Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences. Série II, Mechanics, Physics, Chemistry, Space sciences, Earth sciences, 313 (1991) 1117-1122

    1991

  56. [56]

    Halperin, M

    A. Halperin, M. Kröger, F.M. Winnik, Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Phase Diagrams: Fifty Years of Research, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 54 (2015) 15342–15367

    2015

  57. [57]

    Zhulina, O.V

    E.B. Zhulina, O.V. Borisov, V.A. Pryamitsyn, T.M. Birshtein, Coil -globule type transitions in polymers. 1. Collapse of layers of grafted polymer chains, Macromolecules, 24 (1991) 140– 149

    1991

  58. [58]

    Zhulina, V.A

    E.B. Zhulina, V.A. Pryamitsyn, O.V. Borisov, Structure and conformational transitions in grafted polymer chain layers. A new theory, Polymer Science USSR, 31 (1989) 205-216

    1989

  59. [59]

    J.-H. Guo, Y. Luo, A. Augustsson, S. Kashtanov, J. -E. Rubensson, D.K. Shuh, H. Ågren, J. Nordgren, Molecular Structure of Alcohol -Water Mixtures, Physical Review Letters, 91 (2003) 157401

    2003

  60. [60]

    Yong, Polymer Phase Separation in Competition Solvents (open access), The Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany, 2021, pp

    H. Yong, Polymer Phase Separation in Competition Solvents (open access), The Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany, 2021, pp. 1-140

    2021

  61. [61]

    Peeters, P.L

    D. Peeters, P.L. Huyskens, Endothermicity or exothermicity of water/alcohol mixtures, Journal of Molecular Structure, 300 (1993) 539-550

    1993

  62. [62]

    Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Third edition), Academic Press, London, UK, 2011

    J.N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Third edition), Academic Press, London, UK, 2011

    2011

  63. [63]

    H. Yong, H. Merlitz, A. Fery, J. -U. Sommer, Polymer Brushes and Gels in Competing Solvents: The Role of Different Interactions and Quantitative Predictions for Poly(N - isopropylacrylamide) in Alcohol–Water Mixtures, Macromolecules, 53 (2020) 2323–2335

    2020

  64. [64]

    H. Yong, E. Bittrich, P. Uhlmann, A. Fery, J. -U. Sommer, Co -Nonsolvency Transition of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Brushes in a Series of Binary Mixtures, Macromolecules, 52 (2019) 6285–6293

    2019

  65. [65]

    Galuschko, J.-U

    A. Galuschko, J.-U. Sommer, Co-Nonsolvency Response of a Polymer Brush: A Molecular Dynamics Study, Macromolecules, 52 (2019) 4120–4130

    2019

  66. [66]

    J. -U. Sommer, Gluonic and Regulatory Solvents: A Paradigm for Tunable Phase Segregation in Polymers, Macromolecules, 51 (2018) 3066-3074

    2018

  67. [67]

    J. -U. Sommer, Adsorption –Attraction Model for Co -Nonsolvency in Polymer Brushes, 30 Macromolecules, 50 (2017) 2219-2228

    2017

  68. [68]

    Milner, T.A

    S.T. Milner, T.A. Witten, M.E. Cates, Theory of the Grafted Polymer Brush, Macromolecules, 21 (1988) 2610-2619

    1988

  69. [69]

    Semenov, Contribution to the theory of microphase layering in block -copolymer melts, Soviet Physics JETP, 61 (1985) 733-742

    A.N. Semenov, Contribution to the theory of microphase layering in block -copolymer melts, Soviet Physics JETP, 61 (1985) 733-742

    1985

  70. [70]

    S. Qi, L.I. Klushin, A.M. Skvortsov, M. Liu, J. Zhou, F. Schmid, Tuning Transition Properties of Stimuli-Responsive Brushes by Polydispersity, Advanced Functional Materials, 28 (2018) 1800745

    2018

  71. [71]

    Conrad, M.L

    J.C. Conrad, M.L. Robertson, Shaping the Structure and Response of Surface -Grafted Polymer Brushes via the Molecular Weight Distribution, JACS Au, 3 (2023) 333–343

    2023

  72. [72]

    Smook, S.d

    L.A. Smook, S.d. Beer, S. Angioletti -Uberti, A simple model for the barrier properties of brushes with an arbitrary chain length distribution, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 163 (2025) 094901

    2025

  73. [73]

    Mukherji, C.M

    D. Mukherji, C.M. Marques, T. Stuehn, K. Kremer, Depleted depletion drives polymer swelling in poor solvent mixtures, Nature Communications, 8 (2017) 1374

    2017