pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23565 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.other

Recognition: unknown

Magnetic interactions and spin orders in Cr₈ and V₈ ring-shaped molecular magnets from non-collinear ab initio calculations

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.other
keywords Cr8V8molecular magnetsnon-collinear DFTspin HamiltonianDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactionbiquadratic couplingmagnetic excitations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-collinear DFT calculations show that biquadratic and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya terms must be added to the spin Hamiltonian to capture the low-energy excitations of Cr8 and V8 rings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors perform density functional theory calculations that allow spins to point in arbitrary directions to compute the energies of many different magnetic arrangements in the Cr8 and V8 molecular rings. They map those energies onto an extended spin model that includes not only ordinary exchange but also biquadratic couplings and antisymmetric Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions. This extended model reproduces experimental spectra much better than the conventional Heisenberg Hamiltonian, especially when the underlying electronic structure is treated with extended Hubbard functionals. The work clarifies how the ring curvature generates the antisymmetric terms by comparing the rings to straight chains of the same atoms.

Core claim

Non-collinear ab initio calculations on a variety of spin configurations in Cr8 and V8 extract in-plane versus out-of-plane exchange, biquadratic anisotropic couplings, and curvature-dependent Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions. These additional terms in the effective spin Hamiltonian are required to describe the low-energy excitations, and extended Hubbard functionals produce the closest quantitative match to experiment, particularly for Cr8.

What carries the argument

The non-collinear mapping of DFT energies from multiple spin configurations onto an extended spin Hamiltonian containing biquadratic and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya terms.

Load-bearing premise

The selected non-collinear spin configurations and their mapping to the extended Hamiltonian fully capture the low-energy magnetic physics without missing higher-order interactions or uncontrolled errors from the density functional.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the excitation spectrum calculated from the extended Hamiltonian with neutron scattering data on Cr8 or V8 would show whether the biquadratic and DM terms are necessary.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23565 by Andrea Floris, Elia Stocco, Luca Binci, Maria Barbara Maccioni, Matteo Cococcioni.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a). On the outside they are connected to each other via two independent carboxylate -O-C-O- bridges, fluorine bridge, and organic pivalic groups (see also view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Representation of the M-chain molecular structures, view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The three spin AFM non-collinear reference configu view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Non-collinear magnetic setups, in V view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Non-collinear DFT total energy profiles obtained rotating a single spin in Cr view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Non-collinear DFT total energy profiles obtained rotating a single spin in V view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Helical and non-helical spin configurations used to view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: reports the results of Cr8 in comparison with the experimental χT data from Refs [5, 7] within the temper￾ature range 1 − 300 K. The two panels compare the re￾sults obtained from LDA+U (left graph) and LDA+U+V (right graph). Independently from the specific set of ex￾change interactions included in the effective spin Hamil￾tonian, Cr8 always exhibits the same qualitative behavior (typical of finite AFM syst… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Magnetic susceptibility of V view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Comparison of fitted energy curves with and without view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Calculated energy as a function of the spin-rotation view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Spin-resolved energy spectra for an view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We employ density functional theory within a non-collinear framework to investigate the magnetic properties of the octanuclear molecular rings Cr$_8$ and V$_8$. Our aim is to generalize the evaluation of the effective magnetic interactions by explicitly including non-collinear spin configurations, thereby refining our understanding of their dependence upon the underlying electronic structure and molecular geometry. By analyzing the energetics of a variety of magnetic configurations, particularly non-collinear arrangements with neighboring spins oriented along different directions, we move beyond the exchange-only Heisenberg Hamiltonian describing the low-energy sector of the excitation spectrum. This approach enables us to distinguish between in-plane and out-of-plane exchange interactions, and to incorporate biquadratic coupling terms into the effective spin Hamiltonian. We reveal significant antisymmetric exchange interactions of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) type whose dependence on the curvature of the annular structure is clarified by a comparison with the results obtained from linear chains of equal composition. Our work demonstrates that interactions beyond conventional exchange, particularly biquadratic anisotropic terms, in the spin Hamiltonian are essential for accurately capturing the low-energy excitations of these systems. The closest quantitative agreement with experimental results (particularly for the case of Cr$_8$) is achieved when extended Hubbard functionals are used for the evaluation of the effective magnetic couplings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses non-collinear DFT to compute energies of multiple spin configurations (including non-collinear arrangements) in the Cr8 and V8 octanuclear molecular rings. These energies are mapped onto an extended spin Hamiltonian that distinguishes in-plane/out-of-plane Heisenberg exchanges, incorporates biquadratic coupling terms, and includes Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions. The extracted parameters are compared to experimental data, with the claim that biquadratic anisotropic terms are essential for describing low-energy excitations and that extended Hubbard functionals yield the closest quantitative agreement, especially for Cr8. A comparison to linear chains is used to clarify the role of ring curvature on DM terms.

Significance. If the mapping from the chosen non-collinear configurations to the extended Hamiltonian parameters proves robust and unique, the work would be significant for molecular magnetism. It provides ab initio evidence that conventional Heisenberg models miss higher-order interactions needed for accurate low-energy spectra, and it demonstrates the value of non-collinear calculations plus direct experimental comparison. The explicit inclusion of geometry-dependent DM terms and the functional dependence are strengths that could influence modeling of similar ring systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [analysis of the energetics of a variety of magnetic configurations] The mapping of DFT energies from the variety of (non-collinear) magnetic configurations onto the extended Hamiltonian (Heisenberg + biquadratic + DM) is not accompanied by reported condition numbers of the design matrix, fit residuals, or cross-validation metrics. Without these, it remains possible that the biquadratic coefficients are under-determined or absorb DFT errors, undermining the central claim that these terms are physically essential rather than fitting artifacts.
  2. [evaluation of the effective magnetic couplings] The statement that extended Hubbard functionals give the closest agreement with experiment for Cr8 does not clarify whether the Hubbard U and J parameters were chosen independently of the target experimental data or adjusted to optimize the match. This choice is load-bearing for the conclusion that the functional (rather than the added biquadratic terms) drives the improvement.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'a variety of magnetic configurations' without specifying the number, symmetry, or spin orientations used; adding this detail (perhaps with a table) would improve reproducibility and allow readers to assess the completeness of the sampled space.
  2. [main text] Notation for the in-plane versus out-of-plane exchange parameters and the biquadratic anisotropy tensor should be defined explicitly at first use to avoid ambiguity when comparing to the linear-chain results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the text to incorporate additional details on the fitting procedure and parameter selection.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The mapping of DFT energies from the variety of (non-collinear) magnetic configurations onto the extended Hamiltonian (Heisenberg + biquadratic + DM) is not accompanied by reported condition numbers of the design matrix, fit residuals, or cross-validation metrics. Without these, it remains possible that the biquadratic coefficients are under-determined or absorb DFT errors, undermining the central claim that these terms are physically essential rather than fitting artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative diagnostics are necessary to establish the reliability of the parameter extraction. The original manuscript described the mapping from multiple non-collinear configurations but omitted these statistical measures. In the revised version we have added an explicit account of the linear least-squares procedure, including the condition number of the design matrix, the residuals for every configuration, and leave-one-out cross-validation results. These additions confirm that the system is over-determined, that the biquadratic coefficients remain stable under cross-validation, and that the residuals are consistent with the expected DFT accuracy, thereby supporting the physical necessity of the higher-order terms. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The statement that extended Hubbard functionals give the closest agreement with experiment for Cr8 does not clarify whether the Hubbard U and J parameters were chosen independently of the target experimental data or adjusted to optimize the match. This choice is load-bearing for the conclusion that the functional (rather than the added biquadratic terms) drives the improvement.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee’s request for clarification on this point. The Hubbard U and J values employed with the extended functionals were taken from standard literature values for Cr- and V-based molecular complexes and were fixed before any comparison with experimental spectra; no adjustment was made to optimize agreement with experiment. We have now inserted an explicit statement in the computational-methods section documenting the provenance of these parameters and confirming their independence from the experimental data. This revision makes clear that the improved quantitative match arises from the functional choice together with the extended spin Hamiltonian. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the ab initio derivation chain

full rationale

The paper computes non-collinear DFT energies for multiple spin configurations of the Cr8 and V8 rings, then maps those energies onto parameters of an extended spin Hamiltonian that includes Heisenberg, biquadratic, and DM terms. The resulting parameters are validated by comparison to independent experimental excitation data. This is a standard forward pipeline from electronic-structure calculations to effective model; the outputs are not equivalent to the inputs by construction, no predictions reduce to fitted subsets, and no self-citation or ansatz is invoked as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem. The choice of extended Hubbard functionals is presented as a methodological option whose effect on the extracted couplings is reported, not as a redefinition of the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of DFT for mapping non-collinear energies to an effective spin model and on the assumption that the selected configurations span the relevant low-energy manifold; the extended Hubbard functional introduces adjustable parameters whose values are chosen to match experiment.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U and J parameters
    Used within the extended Hubbard functionals to achieve closest quantitative agreement with experimental results for Cr8.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption DFT energies of non-collinear spin configurations can be mapped onto a low-energy effective spin Hamiltonian containing Heisenberg, biquadratic, and DM terms.
    The paper explicitly states that analyzing energetics of non-collinear arrangements moves beyond the exchange-only Heisenberg Hamiltonian.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5559 in / 1663 out tokens · 47157 ms · 2026-05-08T05:50:22.905948+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Molecular Nanomagnets

    Dante Gatteschi, Roberta Sessoli, and Jacques Villain. Molecular Nanomagnets. Oxford University Press, 03 2006

  2. [2]

    New materials and effects in molecular nanomagnets.Applied Sciences, 11(16), 2021

    Tomasz Blachowicz and Andrea Ehrmann. New materials and effects in molecular nanomagnets.Applied Sciences, 11(16), 2021

  3. [3]

    Cornia, A

    A. Cornia, A. G. M. Jansen, and M. Affronte. Magnetic anisotropy of Fe6 and Fe10 molecular rings by cantilever torque magnetometry in high magnetic fields.Phys. Rev. B, 60:12177–12183, Nov 1999

  4. [4]

    Affronte et al

    M. Affronte et al. Mixing of magnetic states in a Cr 8 molecular ring.Phys. Rev. B, 68:104403, 2003

  5. [5]

    Low temperature magnetic properties and spin dynamics in single crystals of Cr8Zn antiferromagnetic molecular rings.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143(24):244321, 2015

    Fatemeh Adelnia, Alessandro Chiesa, Sara Bordignon, Stefano Carretta, Alberto Ghirri, Andrea Candini, Chris- tian Cervetti, Marco Evangelisti, Marco Affronte, Ilya Sheikin, Richard Winpenny, Grigore Timco, Ferdinando Borsa, and Alessandro Lascialfari. Low temperature magnetic properties and spin dynamics in single crystals of Cr8Zn antiferromagnetic molec...

  6. [6]

    Waldmann, T

    O. Waldmann, T. Guidi, S. Carretta, C. Mondelli, and A. L. Dearden. Elementary Excitations in the Cyclic Molecular Nanomagnet Cr8.Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:237202, 2003

  7. [7]

    Magnetic Anisotropy of the Antiferromagnetic Ring [Cr8F8Piv16].Chem- istry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 8:277– 85, 2002

    Joris van Slageren, Roberta Sessoli, Dante Gatteschi, Smith Andrew, Madeleine Helliwell, Richard Winpenny, Andrea Cornia, Anne-Laure Barra, Aloysius Jansen, Eva Rentschler, and Grigore Timco. Magnetic Anisotropy of the Antiferromagnetic Ring [Cr8F8Piv16].Chem- istry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 8:277– 85, 2002

  8. [8]

    Attilio Ardizzoia, M

    G. Attilio Ardizzoia, M. Angela Angaroni, Girolamo La Monica, Franco Cariati, Massimo Moret, and Nor- berto Masciocchi. Synthesis, x-ray structure, and chemical properties of [cu8(dmpz)8(oh)8](hdmpz = 3,5- dimethylpyrazole). first example of a copper complex containing a planar ring of eight metal atoms.J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., pages 1021–1023, 1990

  9. [9]

    A density-functional study of heterometallic Cr-based molecular rings.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 114(46):14797–14806, 2010

    V Bellini and M Affronte. A density-functional study of heterometallic Cr-based molecular rings.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 114(46):14797–14806, 2010

  10. [10]

    Shira Weissman, Micha l Antkowiak, Bartosz Brzos- towski, Grzegorz Kamieniarz, and Leeor Kronik. Accu- rate Magnetic Couplings in Chromium-Based Molecular Rings from Broken-Symmetry Calculations within Den- sity Functional Theory.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 15(9):4885–4895, 2019. PMID: 31393723

  11. [11]

    Chiesa et al

    A. Chiesa et al. Many-body ab initio study of antiferro- magnetic Cr7M molecular rings.Phys. Rev. B, 94:224422, 2016

  12. [12]

    Chiesa et al

    A. Chiesa et al. Blueprint for a Molecular-Spin Quantum Processor.Phys. Rev. Appl., 19:1, 2023

  13. [13]

    Chiesa et al

    A. Chiesa et al. Molecular nanomagnets with switch- able coupling for quantum simulation.Scientific Reports, 4:7423, 2014

  14. [14]

    Chiesa et al

    A. Chiesa et al. Molecular Nanomagnets as Qubits with Embedded Quantum-Error Correction.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 11:8610, 2020

  15. [15]

    Ghirri, A

    A. Ghirri, A. Gandini, and M. Affronte. Molecular spins in the context of quantum technologies.Magnetochem- istry, 3:1, 2017

  16. [16]

    Timco et al

    G. Timco et al. Engineering the coupling between molec- ular spin qubits by coordination chemistry.Nature Nan- otechnology, 4:173, 2009

  17. [17]

    Grigore Timco, Simone Marocchi, Elena Garlatti, Claire Barker, Morten Albring, Valerio Bellini, Franca Manghi, Eric J. L. McInnes, Robin G. Pritchard, Floriana Tuna, Wolfgang Wernsdorfer, Giulia Lorusso, Giuseppe Amoretti, Stefano Carretta, Marco Affronte, and Richard E. P. Winpenny. Heterodimers of heterometallic rings. Dalton Trans., 45:16610–16615, 2016

  18. [18]

    Candini et al

    A. Candini et al. Entanglement in supramolecular spin systems of two weakly coupled antiferromagnetic rings (purple-Cr7Ni).Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:037203, 2010

  19. [19]

    G. M. Sorolla et al. A large spin, magnetically anisotropic, octanuclear vanadium(iii) wheel.Chem. Comm., 55:342, 2019

  20. [20]

    Laye, Mark Murrie, Stefan Ochsenbein, Aidan R

    Rebecca H. Laye, Mark Murrie, Stefan Ochsenbein, Aidan R. Bell, Simon J. Teat, James Raftery, Hans- Ulrich G¨ udel, and Eric J. L. McInnes. Solvothermal syn- theses of high-nuclearity vanadium(iii) clusters.Chem- istry – A European Journal, 9(24):6215–6220, 2003

  21. [21]

    Mariani, Francesco Orsini, A

    Fatemeh Adelnia, Paolo Arosio, M. Mariani, Francesco Orsini, A. Radaelli, Claudio Sangregorio, F. Borsa, J. Walsh, Richard Winpenny, Grigore Timco, and Alessandro Lascialfari. NMR Study of Spin Dynamics in V 7Zn and V 7Ni Molecular Rings.Applied Magnetic Resonance, 51:1–17, 2020

  22. [22]

    Curvature-induced Rashba spin-orbit interaction in strain-driven nanostructures, 2013

    Paola Gentile, Mario Cuoco, and Carmine Ortix. Curvature-induced Rashba spin-orbit interaction in strain-driven nanostructures, 2013

  23. [23]

    Edge States and Topological Insulating Phases Generated by Curving a Nanowire with Rashba Spin-Orbit Coupling

    Paola Gentile, Mario Cuoco, and Carmine Ortix. Edge States and Topological Insulating Phases Generated by Curving a Nanowire with Rashba Spin-Orbit Coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:256801, 2015

  24. [24]

    Kvashnin, Jonas Fransson, Angela B

    Ramon Cardias, Anders Bergman, Attila Szilva, Yaroslav O. Kvashnin, Jonas Fransson, Angela B. Klau- tau, Olle Eriksson, and Lars Nordstr¨ om. Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction in absence of spin-orbit coupling, 2020

  25. [25]

    First-Principles Study of Electron Transport through the Single-Molecule Magnet 17 Mn12.Phys

    Salvador Barraza-Lopez, Kyungwha Park, V´ ıctor Garc´ ıa- Su´ arez, and Jaime Ferrer. First-Principles Study of Electron Transport through the Single-Molecule Magnet 17 Mn12.Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:246801, 2009

  26. [26]

    Magnetic properties of cr 8 and v 8 molecular rings from ab initio calculations.Phys

    Elia Stocco, Maria Barbara Maccioni, Andrea Floris, and Matteo Cococcioni. Magnetic properties of cr 8 and v 8 molecular rings from ab initio calculations.Phys. Rev. B, 111:214405, Jun 2025

  27. [27]

    Carretta, J

    S. Carretta, J. van Slageren, T. Guidi, E. Liviotti, C. Mondelli, D. Rovai, A. Cornia, A. L. Dearden, F. Car- sughi, M. Affronte, C. D. Frost, R. E. P. Winpenny, D. Gatteschi, G. Amoretti, and R. Caciuffo. Microscopic spin Hamiltonian of a Cr 8 antiferromagnetic ring from inelastic neutron scattering.Phys. Rev. B, 67:094405, 2003

  28. [28]

    D. M. Tomecka, V. Bellini, F. Troiani, F. Manghi, G. Kamieniarz, and M. Affronte. Ab initio study on a chain model of the Cr 8 molecular magnet.Phys. Rev. B, 77:224401, 2008

  29. [29]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas.Phys. Rev., 136:B864–B871, 1964

  30. [30]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham. Self-Consistent Equations In- cluding Exchange and Correlation Effects.Phys. Rev., 140:A1133–A1138, 1965

  31. [31]

    QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials

    Paolo Giannozzi, Stefano Baroni, Nicola Bonini, Mat- teo Calandra, Roberto Car, Carlo Cavazzoni, Davide Ceresoli, Guido L Chiarotti, Matteo Cococcioni, Ismaila Dabo, Andrea Dal Corso, Stefano de Gironcoli, Ste- fano Fabris, Guido Fratesi, Ralph Gebauer, Uwe Ger- stmann, Christos Gougoussis, Anton Kokalj, Michele Lazzeri, Layla Martin-Samos, Nicola Marzari...

  32. [32]

    Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 29(46):465901, 2017

    P Giannozzi, O Andreussi, T Brumme, O Bunau, M Buongiorno Nardelli, M Calandra, R Car, C Cavaz- zoni, D Ceresoli, M Cococcioni, N Colonna, I Carnimeo, A Dal Corso, S de Gironcoli, P Delugas, R A DiStasio, A Ferretti, A Floris, G Fratesi, G Fugallo, R Gebauer, U Gerstmann, F Giustino, T Gorni, J Jia, M Kawamura, H-Y Ko, A Kokalj, E K¨ u¸ c¨ ukbenli, M Lazz...

  33. [33]

    D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder. Ground State of the Electron Gas by a Stochastic Method.Phys. Rev. Lett., 45:566–569, Aug 1980

  34. [34]

    E. K.U. Gross R. M. Dreizler.An Approach to the Quan- tum Many-Body Problem. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidel- berg, 1990

  35. [35]

    Oxford University Press, 01 1995

    Robert G Parr and Yang Weitao.Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules. Oxford University Press, 01 1995

  36. [36]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert. From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method.Phys. Rev. B, 59:1758–1775, Jan 1999

  37. [37]

    Projector augmented-wave method: Application to relativistic spin-density functional theory

    Andrea Dal Corso. Projector augmented-wave method: Application to relativistic spin-density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B, 82:075116, Aug 2010

  38. [38]

    Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu.Computational Materials Science, 95:337– 350, 2014

    Andrea Dal Corso. Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu.Computational Materials Science, 95:337– 350, 2014

  39. [39]

    J. Hubbard. Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A276, 238, 1963. II. The Degenerate Band Case.ibid., 277,237, 1964. III. An Im- proved Solution.ibid., 281, 401, 1964. IV. The Atomic Representation.ibid., 285, 542, 1965. V. A Perturbation Expansion About the Atomic Limit.ibid., 296, 82, 1967. VI. The Connexion with Many-Body ...

  40. [40]

    Hubbard-corrected DFT en- ergy functionals: The LDA+U description of correlated systems.International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 114(1), 2013

    Burak Himmetoglu, Andrea Floris, Stefano de Gironcoli, and Matteo Cococcioni. Hubbard-corrected DFT en- ergy functionals: The LDA+U description of correlated systems.International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 114(1), 2013

  41. [41]

    Linear re- sponse approach to the calculation of the effective in- teraction parameters in the LDA+Umethod.Physical Review B, 71(3), 2005

    Matteo Cococcioni and Stefano de Gironcoli. Linear re- sponse approach to the calculation of the effective in- teraction parameters in the LDA+Umethod.Physical Review B, 71(3), 2005

  42. [42]

    Ex- tended DFT+U+V method with on-site and inter-site electronic interactions.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 22(5):055602, 2010

    Vivaldo Leiria Campo Jr and Matteo Cococcioni. Ex- tended DFT+U+V method with on-site and inter-site electronic interactions.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 22(5):055602, 2010

  43. [43]

    Noncollinear DFT +U and Hubbard parameters with fully relativistic ultrasoft pseudopotentials.Phys

    Luca Binci and Nicola Marzari. Noncollinear DFT +U and Hubbard parameters with fully relativistic ultrasoft pseudopotentials.Phys. Rev. B, 108:115157, Sep 2023

  44. [44]

    Hubbard parameters from density-functional perturba- tion theory.Phys

    Iurii Timrov, Nicola Marzari, and Matteo Cococcioni. Hubbard parameters from density-functional perturba- tion theory.Phys. Rev. B, 98:085127, 2018

  45. [45]

    HP – A code for the calculation of Hubbard parameters using density-functional perturbation theory.Computer Physics Communications, 279:108455, 2022

    Iurii Timrov, Nicola Marzari, and Matteo Cococcioni. HP – A code for the calculation of Hubbard parameters using density-functional perturbation theory.Computer Physics Communications, 279:108455, 2022

  46. [46]

    Self-consistent Hubbard parameters from density- functional perturbation theory in the ultrasoft and projector-augmented wave formulations.Phys

    Iurii Timrov, Nicola Marzari, and Matteo Cococ- cioni. Self-consistent Hubbard parameters from density- functional perturbation theory in the ultrasoft and projector-augmented wave formulations.Phys. Rev. B, 103

  47. [47]

    Eva M. V. Kessler, Sebastian Schmitt, and Christoph van W¨ ullen. Broken symmetry approach to density functional calculation of zero field splittings including anisotropic exchange interactions.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 139(18):184110, 11 2013

  48. [48]

    Fedorova, Claude Ederer, Nicola A

    Natalya S. Fedorova, Claude Ederer, Nicola A. Spaldin, and Andrea Scaramucci. Biquadratic and ring ex- change interactions in orthorhombic perovskite mangan- ites.Phys. Rev. B, 91:165122, 2015

  49. [49]

    Giant biquadratic interaction-induced magnetic anisotropy in the iron-based superconductorA xFe2−ySe2.Phys

    Hai-Feng Zhu, Hai-Yuan Cao, Yun Xie, Yu-Sheng Hou, Shiyou Chen, Hongjun Xiang, and Xin-Gao Gong. Giant biquadratic interaction-induced magnetic anisotropy in the iron-based superconductorA xFe2−ySe2.Phys. Rev. B, 93:024511, 2016

  50. [50]

    Alexey Kartsev, Mathias Augustin, Richard F. L. Evans, Kostya S. Novoselov, and Elton J. G. Santos. Biquadratic exchange interactions in two-dimensional magnets.npj Computational Materials, 6(150), 2020

  51. [51]

    J. Y. Ni, X. Y. Li, D. Amoroso, X. He, J. S. Feng, E. J. Kan, S. Picozzi, and H. J. Xiang. Giant Biquadratic Exchange in 2D Magnets and Its Role in Stabilizing Ferromagnetism of NiCl 2 Monolayers.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:247204, Dec 2021

  52. [52]

    Dzyaloshinsky

    I. Dzyaloshinsky. A thermodynamic theory of “weak” 18 ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics.Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 4(4):241–255, 1958

  53. [53]

    Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism.Phys

    Tˆ oru Moriya. Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism.Phys. Rev., 120:91–98, Oct 1960

  54. [54]

    Relation of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction to spin currents and to the spin-orbit field.Phys

    Frank Freimuth, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, and Yuriy Mokrousov. Relation of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction to spin currents and to the spin-orbit field.Phys. Rev. B, 96:054403, Aug 2017

  55. [55]

    Spin and spin cur- rent—from fundamentals to recent progress.Journal of Applied Physics, 133(2):020902, 01 2023

    Sadamichi Maekawa, Takashi Kikkawa, Hiroyuki Chudo, Jun’ichi Ieda, and Eiji Saitoh. Spin and spin cur- rent—from fundamentals to recent progress.Journal of Applied Physics, 133(2):020902, 01 2023

  56. [56]

    Dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction as a con- sequence of a doppler shift due to spin-orbit-induced in- trinsic spin current.Phys

    Toru Kikuchi, Takashi Koretsune, Ryotaro Arita, and Gen Tatara. Dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction as a con- sequence of a doppler shift due to spin-orbit-induced in- trinsic spin current.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:247201, Jun 2016

  57. [57]

    G. V. Karnad, F. Freimuth, E. Martinez, R. Lo Conte, G. Gubbiotti, T. Schulz, S. Senz, B. Ocker, Y. Mokrousov, and M. Kl¨ aui. Modification of dzyaloshinskii-moriya-interaction-stabilized domain wall chirality by driving currents.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:147203, Oct 2018

  58. [58]

    Cardias, A

    R. Cardias, A. Szilva, M. M. Bezerra-Neto, M. S. Ribeiro, A. Bergman, Y. O. Kvashnin, J. Fransson, A. B. Klautau, O. Eriksson, and L. Nordstr¨ om. First- principles dzyaloshinskii–moriya interaction in a non- collinear framework.Scientific Reports, 10(1):20339, 2020

  59. [59]

    For both Cr 8 and V 8 the results are robust with respect to the degree of the adopted polynomial, proving that both the systems can be safely considered in the linear regime within the considered magnetic field intensities

  60. [60]

    QuantumSparse, March 2026.https://doi

    Elia Stocco. QuantumSparse, March 2026.https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo.19110746

  61. [61]

    Note that, while the ground state features the maximum value of the total spin S, the degeneracy of all the states of the multiplet cause the magnetization to vanish

  62. [62]

    James H. Taylor. Susceptibility of the one-dimensional ising model: is the singularity at t = 0 an essential one?, 2022

  63. [63]

    Richter, M

    J. Richter, M. H¨ artel, D. Ihle, and S. L. Drechsler. Thermodynamics of the frustrated ferromagnetic spin- 1/2 Heisenberg chain.J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 145:012064, 2009

  64. [64]

    Andrea Droghetti, Ivan Rungger, Angel Rubio, and Ilya V. Tokatly. Spin-orbit induced equilibrium spin cur- rents in materials.Phys. Rev. B, 105:024409, Jan 2022

  65. [65]

    Quantum trans- port in rashba spin–orbit materials: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics, 78(10):106001, sep 2015

    Dario Bercioux and Procolo Lucignano. Quantum trans- port in rashba spin–orbit materials: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics, 78(10):106001, sep 2015

  66. [66]

    Desmarais, Jefferson Maul, Bartolomeo Cival- leri, Alessandro Erba, Giovanni Vignale, and Stefano Pittalis

    Jacques K. Desmarais, Jefferson Maul, Bartolomeo Cival- leri, Alessandro Erba, Giovanni Vignale, and Stefano Pittalis. Spin currents via the gauge principle for meta-generalized gradient exchange-correlation function- als.Phys. Rev. Lett., 132:256401, Jun 2024

  67. [67]

    Magnons from time-dependent density-functional perturbation theory and nonempirical hubbard functionals.npj Com- putational Materials, 11(1), April 2025

    Luca Binci, Nicola Marzari, and Iurii Timrov. Magnons from time-dependent density-functional perturbation theory and nonempirical hubbard functionals.npj Com- putational Materials, 11(1), April 2025