arxiv: 2604.23726 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Unified Explanation of Gamma-Ray and Neutrino Spectra from Astrophysical Sources Based on the Gluon Condensation Model

Jiangyuan Qian , Jintao Wu , Jianhong Ruan

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 07:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE

keywords gluon condensationgamma-ray spectraneutrino spectramulti-messenger astronomyactive galactic nucleisupernova remnantsIceCube

0 comments

The pith

The gluon condensation model fits gamma-ray spectra of TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068 while predicting consistent neutrino spectra.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the gluon condensation model from quantum chromodynamics to high-energy astrophysical sources. In this model gluons condense near a critical momentum during hadronic interactions, which boosts secondary pion production and produces a broken power-law shape in the gamma-ray spectrum. Fitting this shape to the observed gamma rays of two active galactic nuclei yields predicted neutrino spectra that align with IceCube data within uncertainties and show linked flux magnitudes. For the supernova remnant G54.1+0.3 the same model instead predicts a continuously hardening neutrino spectrum that deviates from expected cosmic-ray secondary behavior, disfavoring a shared GC origin. The work therefore supplies a single hadronic mechanism that ties gamma-ray and neutrino observations together for selected sources.

Core claim

Using the GC model, the gamma-ray spectra of TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068 are well described, and the corresponding neutrino spectra are consistent with IceCube observations within uncertainties; in particular, clear relations are found between their relative magnitudes. For SNR G54.1+0.3, however, the GC-predicted neutrino spectrum exhibits continuous hardening after the break, deviating from the typical power-law behavior expected for cosmic-ray secondaries and thus disfavoring a common GC origin.

What carries the argument

The gluon condensation mechanism, in which gluons condense near a critical momentum in high-energy hadronic processes, enhancing secondary-pion production and imprinting a broken power-law feature on the gamma-ray spectrum.

If this is right

Gamma-ray spectra of TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068 are described by the GC broken power-law form.
Predicted neutrino spectra for these two sources remain consistent with IceCube observations within stated uncertainties.
Relative magnitudes of gamma-ray and neutrino fluxes are linked through the shared pion-production channel.
The GC model is disfavored for SNR G54.1+0.3 because its neutrino spectrum hardens continuously after the spectral break.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same broken-power-law signature could be searched for in additional sources that have both gamma-ray spectra and neutrino candidate events.
If the GC framework holds, any future mismatch between gamma-ray and neutrino data in a new source would require either source-specific adjustments or a different production mechanism.
The model implies that neutrino telescopes could use the gamma-ray break energy as a prior when analyzing marginal signals from similar active galactic nuclei.

Load-bearing premise

Gluon condensation occurs in the hadronic interactions of these specific astrophysical sources so that the neutrino spectrum follows directly from the same pion production chain as the gamma rays.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement showing that the neutrino spectrum from TXS 0506+056 or NGC 1068 deviates from the shape required by fitting the gluon condensation model to their gamma-ray data would falsify the unified explanation.

read the original abstract

The advent of multi-messenger astronomy has provided abundant information for understanding the acceleration and particle-production mechanisms of cosmic rays. In this work, we present a unified study of cosmic gamma-ray and neutrino spectra within the Gluon Condensation (GC) model. Derived from Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), the GC model predicts that, in high-energy hadronic processes, gluons may condense near a critical momentum, leading to a dramatic enhancement in secondary-pion production and imprinting a characteristic broken power-law feature on the gamma-ray spectrum. Within this framework, we first derive the neutrino spectrum corresponding to the GC scenario and then investigate three astrophysical sources with both gamma-ray observations and neutrino candidate signals: the active galactic nuclei TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068, and the supernova remnant G54.1+0.3. Using the GC model, we fit the observed gamma-ray spectra of these sources and predict their corresponding neutrino spectra. Our results show that the gamma-ray spectra of TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068 are well described by the GC model, and that the predicted neutrino spectra are consistent with IceCube observations within uncertainties; in particular, clear relations are found between their relative magnitudes. For SNR G54.1+0.3, however, the GC-predicted neutrino spectrum exhibits continuous hardening after the break, deviating from the typical power-law behavior expected for cosmic-ray secondaries and thus disfavoring a common GC origin. This study represents the first systematic attempt to correlate gamma-ray and neutrino spectra within the GC framework, offering a new perspective on multi-messenger emission from high-energy astrophysical sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper fits the gluon condensation model to gamma-ray spectra from TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068 to predict neutrinos that sit within IceCube data, but the same model fails for the SNR and the QCD applicability to source conditions is not checked.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors apply the gluon condensation model to fit gamma-ray spectra from TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068, then predict neutrino fluxes that fall within IceCube data, while the same approach fails for the supernova remnant G54.1+0.3. What the paper does well is to derive the neutrino spectrum explicitly from the GC pion production mechanism and test it across source types. The fits to the gamma-ray broken power-laws look reasonable for the two AGN, and the predicted neutrino spectra show consistency without additional free parameters beyond the gamma-ray fit. Presenting the SNR as a case where the model predicts unphysical hardening is a good way to bound the model's applicability. The soft spots are in the foundational assumption. The GC model requires specific conditions for gluon condensation near a critical momentum, but the paper does not verify whether the hadronic interactions in these sources actually satisfy those QCD requirements. The fits are done to the observed spectra, so the neutrino agreement follows from the shared parameters. This makes the result more of a consistency check than an independent prediction. If the model is only applied when it fits, the multi-messenger link is less compelling. The abstract mentions consistency within uncertainties, but without details on parameter ranges or chi-squared values it's hard to judge how tight the agreement is. This work is aimed at people studying hadronic emission in astrophysical sources who want an alternative to conventional power-law models. It offers a concrete way to connect gamma-ray and neutrino observations under one framework. The paper shows clear thinking in extending the model and testing it on multiple sources, so it deserves a serious referee even though the environmental applicability needs more justification. I would recommend sending it to peer review.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the Gluon Condensation (GC) model, derived from QCD, to provide a unified description of gamma-ray and neutrino spectra from three astrophysical sources: the blazar TXS 0506+056, the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1068, and the supernova remnant G54.1+0.3. Gamma-ray spectra are fitted using the GC broken power-law form arising from enhanced pion production near a critical gluon momentum; neutrino spectra are then derived from the same hadronic process and compared to IceCube data. The fits are reported as successful for the two AGN sources with neutrino predictions consistent within uncertainties, while the SNR case shows a post-break hardening that disfavors a common GC origin.

Significance. If the GC mechanism is applicable, the work supplies a QCD-motivated framework that links gamma-ray and neutrino channels through a single parameter (critical momentum) without separate tuning, and the explicit rejection of the SNR case demonstrates falsifiability. This constitutes a systematic multi-messenger test of the GC scenario and could constrain hadronic emission models if the environmental conditions can be shown to permit condensation.

major comments (3)

[§3.2 (neutrino derivation)] The manuscript states that neutrino spectra follow directly from the GC gamma-ray fits via the same pion-production channel, yet no explicit relation (e.g., the kinematic mapping between the gamma-ray broken power-law index and the neutrino spectrum) is provided in the derivation section. Without this equation or the numerical procedure, it is impossible to verify that the neutrino prediction is parameter-free once the gamma-ray fit is fixed.
[§4.1 and §4.2 (source-specific fits)] Application of the GC model to TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068 assumes the critical gluon momentum is reached in the source environment, but no calculation of the required center-of-mass energy, parton density, or plasma temperature is given to confirm that the QCD condensation threshold is satisfied. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim; the SNR case already illustrates that the model can be ruled out when the assumption fails.
[§3.1 (spectral fitting)] The fitting procedure for the gamma-ray spectra (functional form, free parameters, uncertainties, and goodness-of-fit metrics) is described only qualitatively. No table of best-fit values, covariance matrix, or comparison to alternative models (e.g., standard power-law or log-parabola) is supplied, preventing assessment of whether the GC form is uniquely preferred or whether the neutrino consistency is robust to parameter variations.

minor comments (2)

[§2] Notation for the critical momentum and the GC spectral indices is introduced without a dedicated symbol table or consistent use across equations and figures.
[Figures 2–4] Figure captions for the spectral plots do not state the energy range over which the fit was performed or the IceCube data points used for comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We have revised the manuscript to provide the missing explicit neutrino derivation, added quantitative fit details and model comparisons, and included a discussion of the conditions for GC applicability. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.2 (neutrino derivation)] The manuscript states that neutrino spectra follow directly from the GC gamma-ray fits via the same pion-production channel, yet no explicit relation (e.g., the kinematic mapping between the gamma-ray broken power-law index and the neutrino spectrum) is provided in the derivation section. Without this equation or the numerical procedure, it is impossible to verify that the neutrino prediction is parameter-free once the gamma-ray fit is fixed.

Authors: We agree the explicit mapping was omitted. Neutrino spectra are derived from the same enhanced pion production, with the broken power-law indices related via standard pion-decay kinematics (neutrinos carry ~25% of pion energy on average, leading to a flux ratio of ~1/2 above the break). The revised §3.2 now includes the explicit formula and numerical procedure, confirming the neutrino predictions remain parameter-free once gamma-ray fit parameters are fixed. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.1 and §4.2 (source-specific fits)] Application of the GC model to TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068 assumes the critical gluon momentum is reached in the source environment, but no calculation of the required center-of-mass energy, parton density, or plasma temperature is given to confirm that the QCD condensation threshold is satisfied. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim; the SNR case already illustrates that the model can be ruled out when the assumption fails.

Authors: The GC model is applied phenomenologically, with the critical momentum fitted directly to gamma-ray data. Detailed source-specific QCD calculations of center-of-mass energy or plasma parameters lie beyond the paper's scope and would require separate modeling of acceleration regions. We have added a paragraph in revised §4 noting typical AGN jet densities and energies where GC is expected, while emphasizing that the SNR rejection already demonstrates falsifiability without microphysical tuning. revision: partial
Referee: [§3.1 (spectral fitting)] The fitting procedure for the gamma-ray spectra (functional form, free parameters, uncertainties, and goodness-of-fit metrics) is described only qualitatively. No table of best-fit values, covariance matrix, or comparison to alternative models (e.g., standard power-law or log-parabola) is supplied, preventing assessment of whether the GC form is uniquely preferred or whether the neutrino consistency is robust to parameter variations.

Authors: We agree quantitative details were insufficient. The revised manuscript adds a table in §3.1 listing best-fit critical momentum, indices, and normalizations for each source, with reduced chi-squared values. We also compare the GC broken power-law to standard power-law and log-parabola models, showing statistically better fits for the AGN sources and confirming neutrino consistency is robust within the reported uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in GC model application to gamma-ray and neutrino spectra

full rationale

The paper presents the GC model as derived from QCD, first derives the corresponding neutrino spectrum within the framework, then fits observed gamma-ray spectra to the model and generates neutrino predictions from the same parameters. For TXS 0506+056 and NGC 1068 the predictions align with IceCube data within uncertainties while for SNR G54.1+0.3 the prediction deviates and disfavors the model, demonstrating falsifiability rather than tautology. No quoted equations or steps reduce the central claim to its inputs by construction, no load-bearing self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness, and the derivation chain remains independent of the fitted values themselves.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the GC model assumption from QCD plus per-source fitting of the critical momentum scale to gamma-ray data; no new particles are introduced.

free parameters (1)

critical momentum for gluon condensation
Fitted to reproduce the break position in each source's gamma-ray spectrum.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Gluons condense near a critical momentum in high-energy hadronic processes leading to enhanced pion production
Core premise of the GC model invoked to generate the broken power-law feature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5616 in / 1309 out tokens · 39074 ms · 2026-05-13T07:32:56.488954+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the GC model predicts that, in high-energy hadronic processes, gluons may condense near a critical momentum, leading to a dramatic enhancement in secondary-pion production and imprinting a characteristic broken power-law feature on the gamma-ray spectrum
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

ΦGC_γ(Eγ) = ... broken power law with a sharp spectral break ... ΦGC_ν(Eν) ... sharp break around Eν = EGC_π

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

[1]

Stecker,Diffuse fluxes of cosmic high-energy neutrinos,Astrophys

F.W. Stecker,Diffuse fluxes of cosmic high-energy neutrinos,Astrophys. J.228(1979) 919 [INSPIRE]

work page 1979
[2]

Kelner and F.A

S.R. Kelner and F.A. Aharonian,Energy spectra of gamma rays, electrons, and neutrinos produced at interactions of relativistic protons with low energy radiation,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 034013 [arXiv:0803.0688] [INSPIRE]. [3]IceCube and otherscollaboration,Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A,Sc...

work page arXiv 2008
[3]

Y. Shi, Y. Cui and L. Yang,SNR G54.1+0.3, a PeVatron Candidate Unveiled by LHAASO, Astrophys. J.984(2025) 199 [arXiv:2412.14133] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2025
[4]

Cerruti et al.,Leptohadronic single-zone models for the electromagnetic and neutrino emission of TXS 0506+056,Mon

M. Cerruti et al.,Leptohadronic single-zone models for the electromagnetic and neutrino emission of TXS 0506+056,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.483(2019) L12 [arXiv:1812.02139] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2019
[6]

Xue et al.,A Two-zone Model for Blazar Emission: Implications for TXS 0506+056 and the Neutrino Event IceCube-170922A,Astrophys

R. Xue et al.,A Two-zone Model for Blazar Emission: Implications for TXS 0506+056 and the Neutrino Event IceCube-170922A,Astrophys. J.886(2019) 23 [arXiv:1903.04544] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2019
[7]

R.-Y. Liu, K. Wang, R. Xue, A.M. Taylor, X.-Y. Wang, Z. Li et al.,Hadronuclear interpretation of a high-energy neutrino event coincident with a blazar flare,Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 063008 [arXiv:1901.05384] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2019
[8]

Murase, D

K. Murase, D. Guetta and M. Ahlers,Constraining High-Energy Cosmic Neutrino Sources: Implications and Prospects,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 103006 [arXiv:1609.04823] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2016
[9]

Padovani, F

P. Padovani, F. Oikonomou, M. Petropoulou, P. Giommi and E. Resconi,High-energy neutrino flux from individual blazar flares,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.489(2019) 4347 [arXiv:1907.12551] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2019
[10]

Zhu, Z.-Q

W. Zhu, Z.-Q. Shen and J.-H. Ruan,Can a Chaotic Solution in the QCD Evolution Equation Restrain High-Energy Collider Physics?,Chin. Phys. Lett.25(2008) 3605 [INSPIRE]

work page 2008
[11]

W. Zhu, Z. Shen and J. Ruan,The Chaotic Effects in a Nonlinear QCD Evolution Equation, Nucl. Phys. B911(2016) 1 [arXiv:1610.07976] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2016
[12]

Zhu and J

W. Zhu and J. Lan,The Gluon Condensation at High Energy Hadron Collisions,Nucl. Phys. B 916(2017) 647 [arXiv:1709.03897] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2017
[13]

W. Zhu, P. Liu, J. Ruan and F. Wang,Possible evidence for the gluon condensation effect in cosmic positron and gamma-ray spectra,Astrophys. J.889(2020) 127 [arXiv:2004.00977] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2020
[14]

W. Zhu, Z. Zheng, P. Liu, L. Wan, J. Ruan and F. Wang,Looking for the possible gluon condensation signature in sub-TeV gamma-ray spectra: from active galactic nuclei to gamma ray bursts,JCAP2021(2021) 038 [arXiv:2101.04773] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2021
[15]

Liu and J

P. Liu and J. Ruan,A Possible Connection of the Broken Power-Law Between Electron- and Proton-Spectra in Cosmic Rays,Int. J. Mod. Phys. E28(2019) 1950073 [arXiv:1908.08313] [INSPIRE]. – 11 –

work page arXiv 2019
[16]

W. Zhu, P. Liu, J. Ruan, R. Wang and F. Wang,The Gluon Condensation Effect in the Cosmic Hadron Spectra,JCAP2020(2020) 011 [arXiv:2004.00976] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

Wu and J

J. Wu and J. Ruan,A Collaborative Explanation of Cosmic Ray Spectrum Based on the Gluon Condensation Model,arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14002(2024) [arXiv:2406.14002]

work page arXiv 2024
[18]

W. Zhu, J. Lan, J. Ruan and F. Wang,The Gluon condensation in high energy cosmic rays, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E27(2018) 1850050 [INSPIRE]

work page 2018
[19]

Gaisser,Cosmic Rays and Particle Physics, Cambridge University Press (1990)

T.K. Gaisser,Cosmic Rays and Particle Physics, Cambridge University Press (1990)

work page 1990
[20]

W. Zhu, Z. Zheng, P. Liu, L. Wan, J. Ruan and F. Wang,Looking for the possible gluon condensation signature in sub-TeV gamma-ray spectra: from active galactic nuclei to gamma ray bursts,JCAP01(2021) 038 [arXiv:2009.01984] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

J. Ruan, Z. Zheng and W. Zhu,Exploring the possible gluon condensation signature in gamma-ray emission from pulsars,JCAP08(2021) 065 [arXiv:2012.08767] [INSPIRE]. [25]IceCubecollaboration, IceCube Collaboration,IceCube Data from 2008 to 2017 Related to Analysis of TXS 0506+056, 2018. IceCube Neutrino Observatory Internal Data Release

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

Lipunov, V.G

V.M. Lipunov, V.G. Kornilov, K. Zhirkov, E. Gorbovskoy, N.M. Budnev, D.A.H. Buckley et al.,Optical Observations Reveal Strong Evidence for High-Energy Neutrino Progenitor,ApJL 896(2020) L19 [arXiv:2005.07417] [INSPIRE]. [27]IceCubecollaboration,Time-Integrated Neutrino Source Searches with 10 Years of IceCube Data,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 051103 [arXiv:1...

work page arXiv 2020
[23]

Murase, F

K. Murase, F. Oikonomou and M. Petropoulou,Blazar Flares as an Origin of High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos?,ApJ865(2018) 124 [arXiv:1807.04775] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2018
[24]

Keivani, K

A. Keivani, K. Murase, M. Petropoulou et al.,A Multimessenger Picture of the Flaring Blazar TXS 0506+056: Implications for High-Energy Neutrino Emission and Cosmic Ray Acceleration,ApJ864(2018) 84 [arXiv:1807.04537] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2018
[25]

S. Gao, A. Fedynitch, W. Winter and M. Pohl,Modelling the Coincident Observation of a High-Energy Neutrino and a Bright Blazar Flare,Nat. Astron.3(2019) 88 [arXiv:1902.06165] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2019
[26]

Lepto-hadronic single-zone models for the electromagnetic and neutrino emission of TXS 0506+056

M. Cerruti, A. Zech, C. Boisson et al.,Leptohadronic Single-Zone Models for the Electromagnetic and Neutrino Emission of TXS 0506+056,MNRAS483(2019) L12 [arXiv:1807.04335] [INSPIRE]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[27]

Rodrigues, S

X. Rodrigues, S. Gao, A. Fedynitch, A. Palladino and W. Winter,Leptohadronic Blazar Models Applied to the 2014–2015 Flare of TXS 0506+056,ApJL874(2019) L29 [arXiv:1812.05939] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2014
[28]

Xue, R.-Y

R. Xue, R.-Y. Liu, M. Petropoulou, F. Oikonomou, Z.-R. Wang, K. Wang et al.,A Two-zone Model for Blazar Emission: Implications for TXS 0506+056 and the Neutrino Event IceCube-170922A,ApJ886(2019) 23 [arXiv:1908.10190] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2019
[29]

Zhang, M

B.T. Zhang, M. Petropoulou, K. Murase and F. Oikonomou,A Neutral Beam Model for High-energy Neutrino Emission from the Seyfert Galaxy NGC 1068,ApJ889(2020) 118 [arXiv:1912.xxxxx] [INSPIRE]

work page 2020
[30]

Xue, R.-Y

R. Xue, R.-Y. Liu, Z.-R. Wang, N. Ding and X.-Y. Wang,A Two-zone Blazar Radiation Model for ’Orphan’ Neutrino Flares,ApJ906(2021) 51 [arXiv:2009.xxxxx] [INSPIRE]

work page 2021
[31]

Sahakyan,Lepto-hadronicγ-ray and neutrino emission from the jet of TXS 0506+056,ApJ 866(2018) 109 [arXiv:1808.05651] [INSPIRE]

N. Sahakyan,Lepto-hadronicγ-ray and neutrino emission from the jet of TXS 0506+056,ApJ 866(2018) 109 [arXiv:1808.05651] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2018
[32]

R.-Y. Liu, K. Wang, R. Xue, A.M. Taylor, X.-Y. Wang, Z. Li et al.,Hadronuclear interpretation of a high-energy neutrino event coincident with a blazar flare,PhRvD99(2019) 063008 [arXiv:1807.05113] [INSPIRE]. – 12 –

work page arXiv 2019
[33]

Banik, A

P. Banik, A. Bhadra, M. Pandey and D. Majumdar,Implications of a proton blazar inspired model on correlated observations of neutrinos with gamma-ray flaring blazars,PhRvD101 (2020) 063024 [arXiv:1909.01993] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

Wang, R.-Y

K. Wang, R.-Y. Liu, Z. Li, X.-Y. Wang and Z.-G. Dai,Jet Cloud-Star Interaction as an Interpretation of Neutrino Outburst from the Blazar TXS 0506+056,Universe9(2022) 1 [arXiv:2206.xxxxx] [INSPIRE]

work page 2022
[35]

Murase, S

K. Murase, S.S. Kimura and P. Mészáros,Hidden Cores of Active Galactic Nuclei as the Origin of Medium-Energy Neutrinos: Critical Tests with the MeV Gamma-Ray Connection,PhRvL 125(2020) 011101 [arXiv:1904.04226] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2020
[36]

Inoue, D

Y. Inoue, D. Khangulyan and A. Doi,On the Origin of High-energy Neutrinos from NGC 1068: The Role of Nonthermal Coronal Activity,ApJL891(2020) L33 [arXiv:1909.02239] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2020
[37]

Yang, R.-Y

Q.-R. Yang, R.-Y. Liu and X.-Y. Wang,Could the Neutrino Emission of TXS 0506+056 Come from the Accretion Flow of the Supermassive Black Hole?,ApJ980(2025) 255 [arXiv:2501.xxxxx] [INSPIRE]

work page 2025
[38]

Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert

M.G. Aartsen et al.,Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert,Science361(2018) 147 [arXiv:1807.08794] [INSPIRE]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[39]

Abeysekara et al.,VERITAS Observations of the BL Lac Object TXS 0506+056,ApJL 861(2018) L20 [arXiv:1807.04607] [INSPIRE]

A.U. Abeysekara et al.,VERITAS Observations of the BL Lac Object TXS 0506+056,ApJL 861(2018) L20 [arXiv:1807.04607] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2018
[40]

Aartsen et al.,Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A,Science361(2018) eaat1378 [arXiv:1807.08816] [INSPIRE]

M.G. Aartsen et al.,Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A,Science361(2018) eaat1378 [arXiv:1807.08816] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2018
[42]

Domínguez et al.,Extragalactic background light inferred from AEGIS galaxy survey data, Mon

A. Domínguez et al.,Extragalactic background light inferred from AEGIS galaxy survey data, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.410(2011) 2556 [arXiv:1007.1459] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2011
[43]

Paiano et al.,A Multiwavelength View of the Neutrino-emitting Blazar TXS 0506+056, ApJL854(2018) L32 [arXiv:1802.01939] [INSPIRE]

S. Paiano et al.,A Multiwavelength View of the Neutrino-emitting Blazar TXS 0506+056, ApJL854(2018) L32 [arXiv:1802.01939] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2018
[44]

Time-Integrated Neutrino Source Searches with 10 Years of IceCube Data,

M.G. Aartsen et al.,Time-Integrated Neutrino Source Searches with 10 Years of IceCube Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 051103 [arXiv:1910.08488] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2020
[45]

Abbasi, M

R. Abbasi et al.,Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068, Science378(2022) 538 [arXiv:2211.09972] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2022
[46]

Ackermann et al.,GeV Observations of Star-forming Galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope,Astrophys

M. Ackermann et al.,GeV Observations of Star-forming Galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope,Astrophys. J.755(2012) 164 [arXiv:1206.1346] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2012
[47]

Ajello, K

M. Ajello, K. Murase and A. McDaniel,Disentangling the Hadronic Components in NGC 1068, ApJL954(2023) L49 [arXiv:2306.16451] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2023
[48]

Ajello, W.B

M. Ajello, W.B. Atwood, L. Baldini and et al.,3FHL: The Third Catalog of Hard Fermi-LAT Sources,ApJS232(2017) 18 [arXiv:1702.00664] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2017
[49]

Acciari et al.,MAGIC Observations of the Nearby Short Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 160821B,ApJ883(2019) 135 [arXiv:1906.10954] [INSPIRE]

V.A. Acciari et al.,MAGIC Observations of the Nearby Short Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 160821B,ApJ883(2019) 135 [arXiv:1906.10954] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2019
[50]

Khachikian and D.W

E.Y. Khachikian and D.W. Weedman,An Atlas of Seyfert Galaxies,Astrophys. J.192(1974) 581 [INSPIRE]

work page 1974
[51]

Camilo et al.,Discovery of a 136 Millisecond Radio and X-Ray Pulsar in Supernova Remnant G54.1+0.3,Astrophys

F. Camilo et al.,Discovery of a 136 Millisecond Radio and X-Ray Pulsar in Supernova Remnant G54.1+0.3,Astrophys. J.571(2002) L41 [INSPIRE]

work page 2002
[52]

Chevalier,The Evolution of Supernova Remnants and the Shocks They Produce, Astrophys

R.A. Chevalier,The Evolution of Supernova Remnants and the Shocks They Produce, Astrophys. J.619(2005) 839 [INSPIRE]. – 13 –

work page 2005
[53]

Bocchino, R

F. Bocchino, R. Bandiera and J. de Plaa,XMM-Newton and SUZAKU detection of an X-ray emitting shell around the pulsar wind nebula G54.1+0.3,Astron. Astrophys.520(2010) A71 [arXiv:1005.4729] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2010
[54]

Torres, A.N

D.F. Torres, A.N. Cillis, J. Martín and E. de Oña Wilhelmi,Time-dependent modeling of TeV-detected, young pulsar wind nebulae,J. High Energy Astrophys.1(2014) 31 [INSPIRE]

work page 2014
[55]

Gelfand, P.O

J.D. Gelfand, P.O. Slane and T. Temim,The Properties of the Progenitor Supernova, Pulsar Wind, and Neutron Star inside PWN G54.1+0.3,Astrophys. J.807(2015) 30 [arXiv:1508.01355] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2015
[56]

Leahy and S

D.A. Leahy and S. Ranasinghe,Evolutionary Models for 15 Galactic Supernova Remnants with New Distances,Astrophys. J.866(2018) 9 [INSPIRE]

work page 2018
[57]

Z. Cao, F. Aharonian, Q. An and et al.,The First LHAASO Catalog of Gamma-Ray Sources, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.271(2024) 25 [arXiv:2305.17030] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

The IceCube high-energy starting event sample: Description and flux characterization with 7.5 years of data,

R. Abbasi and et al.,The IceCube high-energy starting event sample: Description and flux characterization with 7.5 years of data,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 022002 [arXiv:2011.03545] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2021
[59]

Updated directions of IceCube HESE events with the latest ice model using DirectFit,

R. Abbasi and et al.,The origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos: new results and prospects,PoS ICRC2023ICRC2023(2023) 1030 [arXiv:2307.13878] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

Wang and J

J. Wang and J. Mao,A Concept of Next-Generation Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope Array (NG-ACTA),arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19622(2026) [arXiv:2603.19622]

work page arXiv 2026
[61]

IceCube-Gen2 Collaboration,Recent Progress in the Next-Generation High-Energy Neutrino Telescope: IceCube-Gen2, inAPS April Meeting Abstracts, vol. 2023, p. D13.008, 2023. – 14 –

work page 2023