pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23794 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

SCAT Data Release 1: 1810 optical spectra of 1330 transients

Michael A. Tucker , Mark E. Huber , Benjamin J. Shappee , Jason T. Hinkle , Willem B. Hoogendam , Charlotte R. Angus , Chris Ashall , Katie Auchettl
show 13 more authors
Kenneth C. Chambers Dhvanil D. Desai Aaron Do Joseph Ghammashi Catherine J. Grier Joanna Herman Thomas de Jaeger Jodie Kiyokawa Thomas B. Lowe Eugene A. Magnier Anna V. Payne Sara Romagnoli David Rubin
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords supernovaetransientsspectroscopylight curvesdata releasehost galaxiesredshiftsclassification
0
0 comments X

The pith

SCAT data release supplies 1810 spectra of 1330 transients to benchmark light-curve classification pipelines.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The SCAT survey releases its first five years of optical spectra for over a thousand transients, grouped into supernovae, nuclear transients, and stellar variability. Light curves from multiple imaging surveys are modeled to estimate peak brightness and explosion times for each event. Host galaxies are identified for the extragalactic transients, and new redshifts are measured for about half the supernova hosts, which are mostly faint dwarf galaxies. The authors present this collection of spectra, fitted light curves, luminosities, redshifts, and host properties as a ready-made test set for algorithms that classify transients from photometry alone in large, deep surveys.

Core claim

SCAT DR1 contains 1810 spectra of 1330 transients sorted into broad spectroscopic classes of supernovae, nuclear transients, and stellar variability. Multi-filter light curves are collected and fit with phenomenological models to derive peak magnitudes and times of explosion or first light. Extragalactic transients are matched to candidate hosts, enabling comparisons of host luminosities and offsets by type, plus new redshifts for roughly half the supernova hosts, most of which are low-luminosity dwarfs similar to the Magellanic Clouds.

What carries the argument

The SCAT spectroscopic classification combined with phenomenological light-curve fitting and host-galaxy matching to produce a labeled dataset of transients.

If this is right

  • Supernovae can supplement redshift measurements for nearby low-luminosity galaxies beyond dedicated surveys.
  • Host-galaxy properties such as luminosity and projected offset can be compared systematically across supernova types.
  • The dataset supports validation and refinement of real-time photometric classification methods for future wide-field surveys.
  • New redshifts for faint dwarf galaxies increase the local volume with known distances.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This labeled set could be used to quantify biases in current photometric classifiers by comparing their outputs against the spectroscopic truth labels.
  • The data may help test whether certain transient classes are systematically missed or misclassified at early times in large surveys.
  • Combining these spectra with other public transient catalogs could create a larger training resource for machine-learning classification models.

Load-bearing premise

The spectroscopic classifications into supernovae, nuclear transients, and stellar variability are reliable, and the light-curve model fits give accurate peak magnitudes and explosion times without major systematic bias.

What would settle it

A direct comparison showing that light-curve-only classifiers achieve markedly different accuracy or type fractions on this dataset than on independent spectroscopic samples, or independent verification revealing large systematic errors in the fitted peak times or magnitudes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23794 by Aaron Do, Anna V. Payne, Benjamin J. Shappee, Catherine J. Grier, Charlotte R. Angus, Chris Ashall, David Rubin, Dhvanil D. Desai, Eugene A. Magnier, Jason T. Hinkle, Joanna Herman, Jodie Kiyokawa, Joseph Ghammashi, Katie Auchettl, Kenneth C. Chambers, Mark E. Huber, Michael A. Tucker, Sara Romagnoli, Thomas B. Lowe, Thomas de Jaeger, Willem B. Hoogendam.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The number of spectra per month for the period covered by DR1. The gap around MJD ∼ 59000 is due to COVID-19 closures. the scope of DR1 and updates to the spectroscopic ex￾traction and calibration processes. §3 describes the clas￾sification approach and taxonomy. §4 associates the ex￾tragalactic transients with potential host galaxies, in￾cluding redshift and distance estimates. §5 outlines the creation an… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: Discovery survey distribution. Right: Distribution of the time between object discovery (when it was reported to TNS) and our first spectrum. (2.6%) having ≥ 5 epochs of spectra.4 We do not com￾bine spectra of the same object taken on the same night to preserve all potential science cases, but combining spectra can trade temporal sampling for improved SNR and artifact rejection. This release only inc… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Per-exposure repeatability of our SNIFS spec￾tra from observations of spectrophotometric standard stars (black) with our spline model overlaid (red). The features at ≈ 4100 ˚A and ≈ 5100 ˚A are from the dichroic ( view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Examples of raster flats from a night with par￾ticularly severe variations in dichroic throughput (UT 2021- 07-10). This night is at the 95th-percentile of flat-field vari￾ability over the course of a night (rms ≈ 1.7%). The best nights show variations of rms ≲ 0.5%. The center-spaxel spectrum for each raster flat is shown in the bottom panel, color-coded by the time elapsed from the first exposure. The me… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of the different quality scores: Bronze (top row), Silver (middle row), and Gold (bottom row). The left column shows a 30′′ × 30′′ cutout of the local environment with the approximate SNIFS FoV shown in purple. The dashed black and white circle is 2′′in diameter. The middle two rows show the R (middle left; λ = 6000 − 8000 ˚A) and B (middle right; λ = 3500 − 4500 ˚A) images created from the SNIFS … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of spectroscopic quality scores de￾scribed in §2.5. SNe Ia (Howell et al. 2006; Hicken et al. 2007), some￾times referred to as Super-MCh SNe Ia due to the above￾average luminosities, and the very low-luminosity class of 02cx-like SNe Ia, often referred to as SNe Iax (Li et al. 2003; Foley et al. 2013). We have a few 02es-like SNe Ia (Ganeshalingam et al. 2012) and two cases of a SN Ia interact… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: The distribution of objects by spectral type in DR1. Right: The median spectral S/N, color-coded by spectral type. Distinct from variability caused by changes in an AGN accretion disk, otherwise quiescent SMBHs can also be temporally illuminated. This occurs following a tidal disruption event (TDE, Rees 1988; Evans & Kochanek 1989), when a star is tidally disrupted after passing so close to an SMBH t… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Example spectra of SNe Ia 1 − 2 weeks before peak (top), around peak brightness (middle), and 1−2 weeks after peak (bottom). Names, redshifts, and phases relative to t1/tmax are shown on the right side. be non-terminal outbursts or eruptions from evolved massive stars (Humphreys & Davidson 1994; Smith et al. 2010). They often show narrow Balmer emis￾sion lines, analogous to SNe IIn but with lower lu￾minosi… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spectroscopic time-series of SNe II spectra that satisfy the quality cuts in §3.1, ordered by phase from top to bottom. discussed at the end of §3.3, we also include one ILRT (2022uqn, Deckers et al. 2022). The last subset of sources have early spectra charac￾terized by a hot blackbody with minimal features. These sources are typically projected on-sky close to a plausi￾ble host galaxy and do not show the… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Example spectra for the different types of nu￾clear transients discussed in §3.2. Names and redshifts are provided along the right side. Pan-STARRS, DeCaLS, or the Digital Sky Survey (DSS, Lasker et al. 1990). These two approaches are highly complementary – Prost reliably captures the positions and shapes of galaxies smaller than a few arc-minutes but struggles with large, nearby galaxies where NED is ver… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Comparing NED redshifts to those measured from the SN spectra themselves using snid-sage (top) and those measured from narrow host-galaxy emission lines (bot￾tom). Note that the y-axes differ by a factor of 10 between the top and bottom panels. The panels along the right side show the collapsed histograms. The top panels are color￾coded by SN type, and the black line in the top right panel is the combined… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Example spectra of stellar transients. Names are given along the right side. 10 2 10 1 Redshift 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 CDF Ia (722) II (272) Ibc (78) nuclear (48) view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Distribution of redshifts for the extragalactic sources. line is modeled as a cubic polynomial. The most common emission lines used are [O II]λ3727˚A, Hα, [N II]λλ6548, 6584˚A, and [S II]λλ6716, 6731˚A. Some￾times the fainter Hγ, Hδ, and [O III]λ4364˚A lines are included. The stronger Hβ and [O III]λλ4959, 5007 ˚A 10 2 10 1 20 0 20 z s a g e × 1 0 3 0.0 0.1 10 2 10 1 zNED 20 0 20 z n arro w × 1 0 4 N = 15… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Left: CDF of absolute r-band magnitudes of the host galaxies. Right: Projected offsets between SNe and their hosts. 4.2. Host Photometry and Projected Offsets The left panel of view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: shows the redshift completeness of SN Ia hosts separated by those with and without existing redshifts from NED. SNe Ia are used for redshift completeness be￾cause they explode in passive and active environments, whereas CC SNe require ongoing or recent star forma￾tion (e.g., Fremling et al. 2020). Luminous galaxies (Mr ≲ −20 mag) within z ≲ 0.03 almost always have a cataloged redshift, and ≳ 50% have a ca… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Example light curve fits for 3 randomly-selected events from each spectral class: SNe Ia (top), SNe II (upper middle), SNe Ibc (middle), nuclear transients (lower middle), and stellar transients (bottom). Partially-transparent points were omitted when fitting the light curve. The name and subtype are provided above each panel. The vertical solid black line and gray-shaded region show the inferred time of … view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Top: The distribution of t1 uncertainties from the light curve fits. The bright subset is shown in green. The vertical dashed yellow line shows our adopted 1-day un￾certainty floor. Bottom: Distribution of (rest-frame) phases relative to t1. where α1 and α2 are the individual power-law indices. The CPL model is scaled by the factor Λλ = Aλ × 10−α , (3) with Aλ denoting the per-filter amplitude of the mode… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21 view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Example ‘summary’ plot for the SN II 2019nvm. Top left: Survey light curves and fits (cf view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Example of the flux re-normalization process used to derive the empirical error model. The top left panel shows the rescaled SNIFS spectra (gray) of EG131 compared to the CALSPEC spectrum (black). The bottom left panel shows the ratio of these as a function of wavelength. The right panels show the same thing, except with a 7th-order polynomial correction applied to reduce broadband errors in the flux and … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first data release (DR1) of the Spectroscopic Classification of Astronomical Transients (SCAT) survey, covering the first $\approx 5$ years of observations (March 2018 - January 2023). DR1 includes 1810 spectra of 1330 transients, which we sort into broad spectroscopic classes including supernovae (SNe), transients originating in galactic nuclei, and stellar variability. We collect multi-filter light curves from imaging surveys and fit them with phenomenological models to estimate peak brightnesses and the time of explosion/first-light. Extragalactic transients are matched to candidate host galaxies, and we compare host-galaxy luminosities and projected offsets by SN type. SNe appear to be a reliable way to augment the redshift coverage of nearby ($z\lesssim 0.1$) galaxies in tandem with dedicated redshift surveys. We present new redshifts for roughly half of the SN host galaxies, most of which are low-luminosity dwarfs similar to the Magellanic Clouds ($M_r \gtrsim -18$ mag). This set of transient spectra, light curves, luminosities, redshifts, and host galaxies offers an excellent testbed for real-time photometric/light curve classification pipelines in the modern era of deep and large-area surveys. We conclude with a brief discussion of the provided data products and status of the SCAT survey.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first data release (DR1) from the SCAT survey, covering ~5 years of observations and releasing 1810 optical spectra for 1330 transients. Transients are sorted into broad spectroscopic classes (supernovae, nuclear transients, stellar variability); multi-filter light curves are collected from public surveys and fit with phenomenological models to derive peak magnitudes and explosion times; extragalactic events are matched to host galaxies with new redshifts reported for roughly half the SN hosts (predominantly low-luminosity dwarfs); and the full set of spectra, light curves, luminosities, redshifts, and hosts is offered as a public testbed for photometric classification pipelines.

Significance. This is a substantial public data release whose value lies in its scale (1330 transients, 1810 spectra) and the combination of spectroscopic labels with multi-band photometry and host information. If the classifications and derived parameters are reliable, the dataset will serve as a useful benchmark for real-time transient classification algorithms in the LSST era and will also support studies of supernova environments and low-redshift galaxy redshift coverage. The public availability of the spectra and light-curve fits is a clear strength.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that transients are sorted into broad classes but does not give the breakdown by class (e.g., number of SNe vs. nuclear transients). Adding these counts would immediately convey sample composition to readers.
  2. A short table or paragraph summarizing the number of transients per year and per class, together with the fraction of events with new host redshifts, would improve clarity in the data-release summary section.
  3. The description of the phenomenological light-curve models would benefit from explicit functional forms or references to the exact fitting routines used, so that users can assess possible systematic effects on the reported peak magnitudes and explosion times.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review and recommendation to accept the manuscript. The referee's summary accurately captures the content, scale, and intended use of the SCAT DR1 data release as a testbed for photometric classification pipelines.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this observational data-release paper

full rationale

The manuscript is a pure data release presenting 1810 spectra, classifications into broad transient classes, phenomenological light-curve fits for peak magnitudes and explosion times, host-galaxy matches, and new redshifts. No theoretical derivations, first-principles predictions, or model-based inferences are advanced as results; all quantities are direct measurements or standard reductions from the observations. The central claim—that the released set forms a useful testbed—is supported by the explicit volume, classification scheme, and data products rather than by any equation or self-citation chain that reduces to the inputs. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an observational data-release paper containing no theoretical derivations, free parameters, axioms, or postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5648 in / 1206 out tokens · 54857 ms · 2026-05-08T05:25:54.036884+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

201 extracted references · 190 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., Allam, S. S., et al. 2008, ApJS, 175, 297, doi: 10.1086/524984

    work page doi:10.1086/524984 2008

  2. [2]

    Survey and Other Telescope Technologies and Discoveries , year = 2002, editor =

    Aldering, G., Adam, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2002, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4836, Survey and Other Telescope Technologies and Discoveries, ed. J. A. Tyson & S. Wolff, 61–72, doi: 10.1117/12.458107

    work page doi:10.1117/12.458107 2002

  3. [3]

    CHARACTERIZING THE<i>V</i>-BAND LIGHT-CURVES OF HYDROGEN-RICH TYPE II SUPERNOVAE

    Anderson, J. P., Gonz´ alez-Gait´ an, S., Hamuy, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 67, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/67

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/67 2014

  4. [4]

    Arnett, W. D. 1982, ApJ, 253, 785, doi: 10.1086/159681

    work page doi:10.1086/159681 1982

  5. [5]

    A., Pian, E., et al

    Ashall, C., Mazzali, P. A., Pian, E., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 5824, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1588 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1588 2019

  6. [6]

    D., M \'e rand , A., et al

    Aydi, E., Monnier, J. D., M´ erand, A., et al. 2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 271, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02725-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02725-1 2026

  7. [7]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L. 2023, AJ, 166, 269, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad08bb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad08bb 2023

  8. [8]

    M., et al

    Baron, E., Ashall, C., DerKacy, J. M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 249, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0e15

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0e15 2025

  9. [9]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2019

  10. [10]

    O., Polishook, D., et al

    Ben-Ami, S., Ofek, E. O., Polishook, D., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 085002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aceb30

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aceb30 2023

  11. [11]

    Blagorodnova, N., Kotak, R., Polshaw, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/107 SCAT DR121 4000 6000 8000 10 14 10 13 f [erg/s/cm2/Å] rescaled CALSPEC SNIFS (N=89) 4000 6000 8000 10 14 10 13 rescaled + polynomial tweak 4000 6000 8000 Wavelength [Å] 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3SNIFS/CALSPEC 4000 6000 8000 Wavelength [Å] 0.7 0.8 0.9 1....

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/107 2017

  12. [12]

    Blondin, S., & Tonry, J. L. 2007, ApJ, 666, 1024, doi: 10.1086/520494

    work page doi:10.1086/520494 2007

  13. [13]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Bohlin, R. C., Gordon, K. D., & Tremblay, P.-E. 2014, PASP, 126, 711, doi: 10.1086/677655

    work page doi:10.1086/677655 2014

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Bohlin, R. C., Hubeny, I., & Rauch, T. 2020, AJ, 160, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab94b4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab94b4 2020

  15. [15]

    Avocado: Photometric classification of astronomical transients with gaussian process augmentation.AJ, 158(6):257, December 2019

    Boone, K. 2019, AJ, 158, 257, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab5182

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab5182 2019

  16. [16]

    D., Ashall, C., et al

    Bose, S., Stritzinger, M. D., Ashall, C., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A169, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553687

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553687 2025

  17. [17]

    Bowen, I. S. 1928, ApJ, 67, 1, doi: 10.1086/143091

    work page doi:10.1086/143091 1928

  18. [18]

    L., & Haiman, Z

    Bucciantini, N., Quataert, E., Metzger, B. D., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 2038, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14940.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14940.x 2009

  19. [19]

    2013, A&A, 549, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219834

    Buton, C., Copin, Y., Aldering, G., et al. 2013, A&A, 549, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219834

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219834 2013

  20. [20]

    2021, A&A, 654, A157, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141078

    Cai, Y.-Z., Pastorello, A., Fraser, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A157, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141078

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141078 2021

  21. [21]

    Carnall, A. C. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1705.05165, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1705.05165 22The SCAT Team

    work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.05165 2017

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    Carrasco-Davis, R., Reyes, E., Valenzuela, C., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 231, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac0ef1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac0ef1 2021

  23. [23]

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.05560 2016

  24. [24]

    D., & Shen , K

    Chomiuk, L., Metzger, B. D., & Shen, K. J. 2021, ARA&A, 59, 391, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-114502

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-114502 2021

  25. [25]

    A., Utomo, D., Leroy, A

    Cronin, S. A., Utomo, D., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac28a2 D´ alya, G., Galg´ oczi, G., Dobos, L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 2374, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1703 D´ alya, G., D´ ıaz, R., Bouchet, F. R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 1403, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1443

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac28a2 2021

  26. [26]

    J., Kasliwal, M

    De, K., Hankins, M. J., Kasliwal, M. M., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 025001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab6069 de Soto, K. M., Villar, V. A., Berger, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 169, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6a4f

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab6069 2020

  27. [27]

    2022, Transient Name Server Classification Report, 2022-3036, 1

    Deckers, M., Harvey, L., Dimitriadis, G., & Yaron, O. 2022, Transient Name Server Classification Report, 2022-3036, 1

    2022

  28. [28]

    M., Paugh, S., Baron, E., et al

    DerKacy, J. M., Paugh, S., Baron, E., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3481, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1171

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1171 2023

  29. [29]

    M., Ashall, C., Baron, E., et al

    DerKacy, J. M., Ashall, C., Baron, E., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1f87 DESI Collaboration, Adame, A. G., Aguilar, J., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad3217 DESI Collaboration, Karim, M. A., Adame, A. G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14745, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14745

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1f87 2026

  30. [30]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  31. [31]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 316, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad710e

    Dong, Y., Valenti, S., Ashall, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 316, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad710e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad710e 2024

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Mahabal, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 870, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/870

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/870 2009

  33. [33]

    Crockett, R. M. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 774, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1612

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1612 2013

  34. [34]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 279, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2705

    Ertini, K., Folatelli, G., Martinez, L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 279, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2705

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2705 2023

  35. [35]

    R., & Kochanek, C

    Evans, C. R., & Kochanek, C. S. 1989, ApJL, 346, L13, doi: 10.1086/185567

    work page doi:10.1086/185567 1989

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Falco, E. E., Kurtz, M. J., Geller, M. J., et al. 1999, PASP, 111, 438, doi: 10.1086/316343

    work page doi:10.1086/316343 1999

  37. [37]

    M., Vallely, P

    Fausnaugh, M. M., Vallely, P. J., Tucker, M. A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aceaef

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aceaef 2023

  38. [38]

    D., & Montmerle, T

    Feigelson, E. D., & Montmerle, T. 1999, ARA&A, 37, 363, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.363

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.363 1999

  39. [39]

    Filippenko, A. V. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 309, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 1997

  40. [40]

    V., Li, W

    Filippenko, A. V., Li, W. D., Treffers, R. R., & Modjaz, M. 2001, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference

    2001

  41. [41]

    V., Matheson, T., & Ho, L

    Filippenko, A. V., Matheson, T., & Ho, L. C. 1993, ApJL, 415, L103, doi: 10.1086/187043

    work page doi:10.1086/187043 1993

  42. [42]

    V., Porter, A

    Filippenko, A. V., Porter, A. C., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1990, AJ, 100, 1575, doi: 10.1086/115618

    work page doi:10.1086/115618 1990

  43. [43]

    V., & Riess, A

    Filippenko, A. V., & Riess, A. G. 1998, PhR, 307, 31, doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00052-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(98)00052-0 1998

  44. [44]

    V ., Richmond, M

    Filippenko, A. V., Richmond, M. W., Matheson, T., et al. 1992a, ApJL, 384, L15, doi: 10.1086/186252

    work page doi:10.1086/186252

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Filippenko, A. V., Richmond, M. W., Branch, D., et al. 1992b, AJ, 104, 1543, doi: 10.1086/116339

    work page doi:10.1086/116339

  46. [46]

    A., Magnier, E

    Flewelling, H. A., Magnier, E. A., Chambers, K. C., et al. 2020a, ApJS, 251, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d —. 2020b, ApJS, 251, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d

  47. [47]

    J., Smith, N., Ganeshalingam, M., et al

    Foley, R. J., Smith, N., Ganeshalingam, M., et al. 2007, ApJL, 657, L105, doi: 10.1086/513145

    work page doi:10.1086/513145 2007

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Foley, R. J., Challis, P. J., Chornock, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 57, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/57

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/1/57 2013

  49. [49]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067 F¨ orster, F., Cabrera-Vives, G., Castillo-Navarrete, E., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 242, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abe9bc

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  50. [50]

    Fraga, B. M. O., Bom, C. R., Santos, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A208, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450370

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450370 2024

  51. [51]

    D., Brennan, S

    Fraser, M., Stritzinger, M. D., Brennan, S. J., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2108.07278, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2108.07278

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07278 2021

  52. [52]

    A., Sharma, Y., et al

    Fremling, C., Miller, A. A., Sharma, Y., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8943

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8943 2020

  53. [53]

    Gagliano, A., de Soto, K., Boesky, A., & Manning, T. A. 2025, alexandergagliano/Prost: v1.2.11, v1.2.11, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15397886 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15397886 2025

  54. [54]

    2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed

    Gal-Yam, A. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed. A. W. Alsabti & P. Murdin, 195, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5 35

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5 2017

  55. [55]

    C., Fox, D

    Gal-Yam, A., Leonard, D. C., Fox, D. B., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 372, doi: 10.1086/510523

    work page doi:10.1086/510523 2007

  56. [56]

    2022, Nature, 601, 201, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04155-1

    Gal-Yam, A., Bruch, R., Schulze, S., et al. 2022, Nature, 601, 201, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04155-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04155-1 2022

  57. [57]

    V., et al

    Ganeshalingam, M., Li, W., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2012, ApJ, 751, 142, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/142

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/751/2/142 2012

  58. [58]

    Gehrels, T., & Binzel, R. P. 1984, Minor Planet Bulletin, 11, 1 SCAT DR123

    1984

  59. [59]

    H., Huber, M

    Gillanders, J. H., Huber, M. E., Nicholl, M., et al. 2025, ApJL, 995, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2125

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae2125 2025

  60. [60]

    2022, ApJ, 941, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9842

    Hosseinzadeh, G. 2022, ApJ, 941, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9842

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9842 2022

  61. [61]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1098, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01981-3 DISCOVERY OFSN 2025MKN11

    Goobar, A., Johansson, J., Schulze, S., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1098, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01981-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01981-3 2023

  62. [62]

    A., Johansson, J., Dhawan, S., et al

    Goobar, A. A., Johansson, J., Dhawan, S., et al. 2022, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 180, 1

    2022

  63. [63]

    2018, ApJ, 863, 175, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad2de

    Goyal, A., Stawarz, L., Zola, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 863, 175, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad2de

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad2de 2018

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    Graham, M. J., Kulkarni, S. R., Bellm, E. C., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 078001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c 2019

  65. [65]

    J., Bloemen, S., Vreeswijk, P

    Groot, P. J., Bloemen, S., Vreeswijk, P. M., et al. 2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12182, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IX, ed. H. K. Marshall, J. Spyromilio, & T. Usuda, 121821V, doi: 10.1117/12.2630160

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2630160 2022

  66. [66]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ad8b6a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PASP..136k5003G 136, 115003

    Groot, P. J., Bloemen, S., Vreeswijk, P. M., et al. 2024, PASP, 136, 115003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ad8b6a Guti´ errez, C. P., Anderson, J. P., Hamuy, M., et al. 2014, ApJL, 786, L15, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/786/2/L15 —. 2017, ApJ, 850, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f52

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad8b6a 2024

  67. [67]

    M., et al

    Hamuy, M., Maza, J., Phillips, M. M., et al. 1993, AJ, 106, 2392, doi: 10.1086/116811

    work page doi:10.1086/116811 1993

  68. [68]

    M., Suntzeff, N

    Hamuy, M., Phillips, M. M., Suntzeff, N. B., et al. 2003, Nature, 424, 651, doi: 10.1038/nature01854

    work page doi:10.1038/nature01854 2003

  69. [69]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  70. [70]

    2025, A&A, 696, A185, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554164

    Haubner, K., Lelli, F., Di Teodoro, E., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A185, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554164

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554164 2025

  71. [71]

    F., Schmitz, M., et al

    Helou, G., Madore, B. F., Schmitz, M., et al. 1991, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 171, Databases and On-line Data in Astronomy, ed. M. A. Albrecht & D. Egret, 89–106, doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-3250-3 10

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3250-3 1991

  72. [72]

    Herbig, G. H. 2008, AJ, 135, 637, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/135/2/637

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/2/637 2008

  73. [73]

    M., Prieto, J

    Hicken, M., Garnavich, P. M., Prieto, J. L., et al. 2007, ApJL, 669, L17, doi: 10.1086/523301

    work page doi:10.1086/523301 2007

  74. [74]

    T., Holoien, T

    Hinkle, J. T., Holoien, T. W.-S., Auchettl, K., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 1673, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3170

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3170 2021

  75. [75]

    T., Holoien, T

    Hinkle, J. T., Holoien, T. W.-S., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f54

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f54 2022

  76. [76]

    T., Tucker, M

    Hinkle, J. T., Tucker, M. A., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 2035, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3659

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3659 2023

  77. [77]

    T., Auchettl, K., Hoogendam, W

    Hinkle, J. T., Auchettl, K., Hoogendam, W. B., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.15326, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.15326

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.15326 2024

  78. [78]

    T., Shappee, B

    Hinkle, J. T., Shappee, B. J., Auchettl, K., et al. 2025, Science Advances, 11, eadt0074, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt0074 Hloˇ zek, R., Malz, A. I., Ponder, K. A., et al. 2023, ApJS, 267, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/accd6a

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adt0074 2025

  79. [79]

    W., Gaidos, E., Kenworthy, M

    Hodapp, K. W., Gaidos, E., Kenworthy, M. A., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1931

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad1931 2024

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    Hodapp, K. W., Denneau, L., Tucker, M., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 164, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abad96

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abad96 2020

Showing first 80 references.