pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24103 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.SY· eess.SY

Fed-DLoRA: Efficient Wireless Federated Learning with Dynamic Low-Rank Adaptation

Huaicheng Li , Junhui Zhao , Haoyu Quan , Xiaoming Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 04:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.SYeess.SY
keywords federated learninglow-rank adaptationinternet of vehicleswireless communicationresource allocationmodel compressionconvergence analysisvehicle scheduling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fed-DLoRA uses dynamic low-rank adaptation to cut communication costs and speed convergence in wireless federated learning for vehicles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Fed-DLoRA combines federated learning with low-rank adaptation to shrink the parameters transmitted over wireless links in internet-of-vehicles settings. It derives convergence bounds by coupling stochastic gradient descent with singular-value decomposition, showing explicit ties between chosen rank, which vehicles participate, and how fast the global model reaches target accuracy. These bounds feed a joint optimization that picks ranks, bandwidth shares, and vehicle sets each round. An adaptive algorithm solves the problem via enumeration plus greedy steps, and experiments report gains in accuracy, round count, and total bits sent versus conventional federated learning under the same channel limits.

Core claim

The paper claims that low-rank adaptation made dynamic across rounds, when paired with convergence analysis from SGD and SVD, yields explicit relationships among rank, vehicular scheduling, and model convergence; these relationships enable a joint optimization solved by the ARBVS algorithm to select ranks, bandwidth, and vehicles, producing higher accuracy, faster convergence, and lower communication volume than standard federated learning in dynamic wireless IoV environments.

What carries the argument

The ARBVS algorithm, which integrates enumeration over possible LoRA ranks with greedy selection of bandwidth allocations and participating vehicles to maximize the performance metric derived from the convergence bounds.

If this is right

  • Each communication round transmits fewer parameters because the selected LoRA rank is tuned to the current channel and participation set.
  • The derived bounds guarantee that convergence rate improves when rank and scheduling follow the joint optimum rather than fixed or random choices.
  • Overall system performance rises because the algorithm balances model quality against the communication and computation costs imposed by vehicle mobility.
  • The same rank-scheduling coupling can be reused in later rounds without retraining the entire analysis from scratch.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar dynamic-rank scheduling may transfer to non-vehicle edge networks where devices also face time-varying wireless links and partial participation.
  • If the SVD step in the analysis remains accurate under realistic quantization, the framework could combine with other parameter-efficient methods such as adapter modules.
  • The joint optimization could be extended to include energy constraints per vehicle, turning the current performance metric into a multi-objective trade-off.

Load-bearing premise

The convergence analysis via SGD coupled with SVD correctly captures the interplay between LoRA rank, vehicular scheduling, and model convergence in dynamic wireless environments, and the ARBVS algorithm reliably solves the resulting joint optimization.

What would settle it

Deploying Fed-DLoRA on a real vehicular network testbed and measuring whether it simultaneously improves final accuracy by several percent, reduces rounds to convergence, and lowers total uplink bits versus FedAvg under identical mobility and channel traces would directly test the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24103 by Haoyu Quan, Huaicheng Li, Junhui Zhao, Xiaoming Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The framework of Fed-DLoRA. III. FL WITH LORA FOR IOV A. System Setup To simulate realistic traffic conditions, this study constructs a dynamic vehicular networking scenario with a single base station, see view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic diagram of LoRA structure. where S is the set of ICVs participating in the FL process, which is adaptively determined by the optimisation algorithm, αn is the weighting factor for aggregation correlation. Fed￾DLoRA adopts the LoRA to lighten the FL training model, aiming to shorten the latency of the local model training and uploading process and to reduce the bandwidth requirement of ICVs. This … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Test accuracy on CIFAR-10 with IID and non-IID dataset view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Test accuracy on CIFAR-100 with IID and non-IID dataset view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of time to reach target accuracy for different numbers of view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ICV Scheduling Comparison Experiment. and 60% of the ICVs are randomly selected to participate in the federated learning training, respectively. It is worth noting that under the strict latency constraints of IoV, the available communication bandwidth directly determines the maximum number of supportable ICVs. Therefore, comparing different ICV participation rates (20%, 40%, 60%) serves as an ablation stud… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Federated learning (FL) offers a promising distributed learning paradigm for internet of vehicles (IoV) applications. However, it faces challenges from communication overhead and dynamic environments. Model compression techniques reduce computing and communication burden yet create trade-offs between compression ratios and vehicle participation strategies. In this paper, we propose a lightweight FL algorithm named federated learning with dynamic low-rank adaptation (Fed-DLoRA), which is combined with low-rank adaptation (LoRA) to effectively reduce parameters and communication costs while enhancing training efficiency. The convergence analysis of Fed-DLoRA is conducted through stochastic gradient descent optimization coupled with singular value decomposition. This analysis establishes the theoretical relationships among LoRA rank, vehicular scheduling strategies and the model's convergence characteristics. Building on these insights, we formulate a joint optimization problem aimed at maximizing system performance. To address this problem, we propose an adaptive rank, bandwidth and vehicle selection (ARBVS) algorithm that integrates enumeration with greedy optimization strategies. The algorithm provides efficient rank selection and resource scheduling strategies for each FL communication round, thereby achieving effective performance improvements for the FL system. Experimental results demonstrate that Fed-DLoRA achieves superior performance compared to conventional federated learning approaches, exhibiting enhanced accuracy, faster convergence, and improved communication efficiency.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Fed-DLoRA, a federated learning algorithm for Internet of Vehicles (IoV) that incorporates dynamic low-rank adaptation (LoRA) to reduce model parameters and communication overhead. It presents a convergence analysis based on stochastic gradient descent (SGD) combined with singular value decomposition (SVD) to relate LoRA rank, vehicular scheduling, and convergence behavior. Building on this, it introduces the Adaptive Rank, Bandwidth, and Vehicle Selection (ARBVS) algorithm to jointly optimize these aspects. The paper claims through experiments that Fed-DLoRA outperforms conventional FL in accuracy, convergence speed, and communication efficiency.

Significance. If the convergence analysis rigorously captures the dynamics of wireless channels and the experimental results are robustly validated with proper controls, this work could advance efficient federated learning in dynamic wireless environments by providing both theoretical insights into rank-scheduling trade-offs and practical optimization strategies. The combination of LoRA compression with adaptive resource allocation directly targets communication and participation challenges in IoV settings.

major comments (1)
  1. [Convergence analysis section] The convergence analysis (described in the abstract and presumably detailed in the main text) couples SGD with SVD for rank selection but supplies no explicit term or bound for time-varying wireless channel effects such as Doppler shift, channel gain fluctuations, or the resulting perturbation to low-rank factors and gradient noise. Standard SGD convergence requires bounded variance and Lipschitz smoothness; vehicular mobility introduces non-stationarity in both channels and data distributions that is not shown to be absorbed into generic constants. This is load-bearing because the subsequent ARBVS joint optimization rests on the claimed relationships among LoRA rank, scheduling, and convergence.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and manuscript provide no dataset details, number of vehicles, communication rounds, error bars, or ablation results, preventing verification of the claimed accuracy, convergence speed, and efficiency gains.
  2. No equations, bounds, or pseudocode for the SGD+SVD analysis or the ARBVS algorithm are visible in the provided text, which hinders assessment of the derivation and implementation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address the single major comment below with a point-by-point response, including proposed revisions to strengthen the presentation of the convergence analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The convergence analysis (described in the abstract and presumably detailed in the main text) couples SGD with SVD for rank selection but supplies no explicit term or bound for time-varying wireless channel effects such as Doppler shift, channel gain fluctuations, or the resulting perturbation to low-rank factors and gradient noise. Standard SGD convergence requires bounded variance and Lipschitz smoothness; vehicular mobility introduces non-stationarity in both channels and data distributions that is not shown to be absorbed into generic constants. This is load-bearing because the subsequent ARBVS joint optimization rests on the claimed relationships among LoRA rank, scheduling, and convergence.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the modeling of channel dynamics. Our convergence analysis proceeds under the standard SGD assumptions of bounded gradient variance and Lipschitz smoothness (as stated in the relevant theorem). The relationships among LoRA rank, vehicular scheduling, and convergence rate are derived by coupling the SGD update with the SVD-based low-rank decomposition; the ARBVS algorithm then selects rank and participating vehicles each round to ensure that only links with sufficiently high instantaneous channel gain are used. This selection mechanism keeps the effective perturbation to the low-rank factors and the additional gradient noise within the generic variance bound already present in the analysis. In other words, the non-stationarity induced by Doppler shifts and mobility is not ignored but is controlled at the algorithmic level so that the standard bounded-variance assumption continues to hold. We acknowledge, however, that the current write-up does not explicitly spell out this absorption argument. We will therefore revise the convergence-analysis section to (i) restate the bounded-variance assumption with a short remark on how ARBVS enforces it under time-varying channels, and (ii) add a brief discussion of the worst-case perturbation size that can be tolerated before the bound is violated. These additions will make the load-bearing link between the analysis and the ARBVS optimizer fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Convergence analysis and ARBVS optimization remain independent; no reduction to self-definition or fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper states that SGD coupled with SVD is used to derive theoretical relationships linking LoRA rank, vehicular scheduling, and convergence rates. These relationships then inform the formulation of a joint optimization problem solved by the ARBVS algorithm. No equations or sections are presented in which the derived bounds are constructed by re-using the same decision variables later optimized in ARBVS, nor is any 'prediction' shown to be a direct renaming or statistical fit of the input parameters. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained: the analysis supplies external bounds that the algorithm then exploits, without the circularity patterns of self-definition, fitted-input prediction, or load-bearing self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract alone; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The method implicitly relies on standard FL convergence assumptions and the validity of low-rank approximations in dynamic channels.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5531 in / 1112 out tokens · 32116 ms · 2026-05-08T04:28:26.231793+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cybertwin-driven federated learning based personalized service provision for 6g-v2x,

    S. B. Prathiba, G. Raja, S. Anbalagan, S. Gurumoorthy, N. Kumar, and M. Guizani, “Cybertwin-driven federated learning based personalized service provision for 6g-v2x,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 4632–4641, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Lane detection by variational auto-encoder with normalizing flow for autonomous driving,

    J. Shi, J. Zhao, D. Wang, and H. Tang, “Lane detection by variational auto-encoder with normalizing flow for autonomous driving,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Bev perception for autonomous driving: State of the art and future perspectives,

    J. Zhao, J. Shi, and L. Zhuo, “Bev perception for autonomous driving: State of the art and future perspectives,”Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 258, p. 125103, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Cross-area travel time uncertainty estimation from trajectory data: A federated learning approach,

    Y . Zhu, Y . Ye, Y . Liu, and J. J. Yu, “Cross-area travel time uncertainty estimation from trajectory data: A federated learning approach,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 24 966–24 978, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Dflnet: Deep federated learning network with privacy preserving for vehicular lora nodes fingerprinting,

    T. Zhang, D. Xu, P. Ren, K. Yu, and M. Guizani, “Dflnet: Deep federated learning network with privacy preserving for vehicular lora nodes fingerprinting,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 2901–2905, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Federated learning for internet of things: Recent advances, taxonomy, and open challenges,

    L. U. Khan, W. Saad, Z. Han, E. Hossain, and C. S. Hong, “Federated learning for internet of things: Recent advances, taxonomy, and open challenges,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1759– 1799, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Fed- erated low-rank adaptation for large models fine-tuning over wireless networks,

    H. Sun, H. Tian, W. Ni, J. Zheng, D. Niyato, and P. Zhang, “Fed- erated low-rank adaptation for large models fine-tuning over wireless networks,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 659–675, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Joint rank optimization and bandwidth allocation for heterogeneous federated lora fine-tuning,

    Y . Zou, Z. Wang, Y . Shi, and Y . Zhou, “Joint rank optimization and bandwidth allocation for heterogeneous federated lora fine-tuning,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., pp. 1–5, 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Federated learning assisted intelligent iov mobile edge computing,

    H. Quan, Q. Zhang, and J. Zhao, “Federated learning assisted intelligent iov mobile edge computing,”IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Mobility-aware cluster federated learning in hierarchical wireless net- works,

    C. Feng, H. H. Yang, D. Hu, Z. Zhao, T. Q. Quek, and G. Min, “Mobility-aware cluster federated learning in hierarchical wireless net- works,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 8441–8458, 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Efficient federated learning in resource-constrained edge intelligence networks using model compression,

    C. Chen, B. Jiang, S. Liu, C. Li, C. Wu, and R. Yin, “Efficient federated learning in resource-constrained edge intelligence networks using model compression,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 2643–2655, 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Spectrum sharing in vehicular networks based on multi-agent reinforcement learning,

    L. Liang, H. Ye, and G. Y . Li, “Spectrum sharing in vehicular networks based on multi-agent reinforcement learning,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Com- mun., vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 2282–2292, 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Joint class- balanced client selection and bandwidth allocation for cost-efficient federated learning in mobile edge computing networks,

    J. Tang, X. Li, H. Li, P. Li, X. Wang, and V . C. Leung, “Joint class- balanced client selection and bandwidth allocation for cost-efficient federated learning in mobile edge computing networks,”IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Dapperfl: Domain adaptive federated learning with model fusion pruning for edge devices,

    Y . Jia, X. Zhang, H. Hu, K.-K. R. Choo, L. Qi, X. Xu, A. Beheshti, and W. Dou, “Dapperfl: Domain adaptive federated learning with model fusion pruning for edge devices,”Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 37, pp. 13 099–13 123, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Model pruning enables efficient federated learning on edge devices,

    Y . Jiang, S. Wang, V . Valls, B. J. Ko, W.-H. Lee, K. K. Leung, and L. Tassiulas, “Model pruning enables efficient federated learning on edge devices,”IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 10 374–10 386, 2022. 11

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Efficient federated learning via adaptive model pruning for internet of vehicles with a constrained latency,

    X. Chang, M. S. Obaidat, J. Ma, X. Xue, Y . Yu, and X. Wu, “Efficient federated learning via adaptive model pruning for internet of vehicles with a constrained latency,”IEEE Trans. Sustain. Comput., 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Selec- tive aggregation for low-rank adaptation in federated learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01463,

    P. Guo, S. Zeng, Y . Wang, H. Fan, F. Wang, and L. Qu, “Selective ag- gregation for low-rank adaptation in federated learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01463, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Convlora and adabn based domain adaptation via self-training,

    S. Aleem, J. Dietlmeier, E. Arazo, and S. Little, “Convlora and adabn based domain adaptation via self-training,” in2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–5

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Differentially private low-rank adaptation of large language model using federated learning,

    X.-Y . Liu, R. Zhu, D. Zha, J. Gao, S. Zhong, M. White, and M. Qiu, “Differentially private low-rank adaptation of large language model using federated learning,”ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1–24, 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Fedfmsl: Federated learning of foundation models with sparsely activated lora,

    P. Wu, K. Li, T. Wang, Y . Dong, V . C. M. Leung, and F. Wang, “Fedfmsl: Federated learning of foundation models with sparsely activated lora,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 15 167–15 181, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Fedra: A random allocation strategy for federated tuning to unleash the power of heterogeneous clients,

    S. Su, B. Li, and X. Xue, “Fedra: A random allocation strategy for federated tuning to unleash the power of heterogeneous clients,” inProc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis.Springer, 2024, pp. 342–358

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Energy efficient federated learning over wireless communication networks,

    Z. Yang, M. Chen, W. Saad, C. S. Hong, and M. Shikh-Bahaei, “Energy efficient federated learning over wireless communication networks,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1935–1949, 2021

    work page 1935

  23. [23]

    Dis- tributed resource allocation with federated learning for delay-sensitive iov services,

    X. Song, Y . Hua, Y . Yang, G. Xing, F. Liu, L. Xu, and T. Song, “Dis- tributed resource allocation with federated learning for delay-sensitive iov services,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 4326–4336, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Energy optimization and lightweight design for efficient federated learning in wireless edge systems,

    L. Lei, Y . Yuan, Y . Zhou, Y . Yang, Y . Luo, L. Pu, and S. Chatzinotas, “Energy optimization and lightweight design for efficient federated learning in wireless edge systems,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Joint device schedul- ing and resource allocation for latency constrained wireless federated learning,

    W. Shi, S. Zhou, Z. Niu, M. Jiang, and L. Geng, “Joint device schedul- ing and resource allocation for latency constrained wireless federated learning,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 453–467, 2020

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Joint device scheduling and bandwidth allocation for federated learning over wireless networks,

    T. Zhang, K.-Y . Lam, J. Zhao, and J. Feng, “Joint device scheduling and bandwidth allocation for federated learning over wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2023

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    E. J. Hu, Y . Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y . Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, W. Chenet al., “Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.” Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 3, 2022

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Resource constrained vehicular edge federated learning with highly mobile connected vehicles,

    M. F. Pervej, R. Jin, and H. Dai, “Resource constrained vehicular edge federated learning with highly mobile connected vehicles,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1825–1844, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Flora: Low-rank adapters are secretly gradient compressors,

    Y . Hao, Y . Cao, and L. Mou, “Flora: Low-rank adapters are secretly gradient compressors,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03293, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images,

    A. Krizhevsky and G. Hinton, “Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images,”Handb. Syst. Autoimmun. Dis., vol. 1, no. 4, 2009

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition,

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 2016, pp. 770–778

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Efficient and private federated learning with partially trainable networks,

    H. Sidahmed, Z. Xu, A. Garg, Y . Cao, and M. Chen, “Efficient and private federated learning with partially trainable networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03450, 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Scheduling policies for federated learning in wireless networks,

    H. H. Yang, Z. Liu, T. Q. Quek, and H. V . Poor, “Scheduling policies for federated learning in wireless networks,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 317–333, 2019. APPENDIX PROOF OFTHEOREM1 This appendix provides the detailed derivation for Theorem

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    (A.2) Under Assumption 3 (bounded variance), the first term in (A.2) is bounded byσ 2P α2 n, leading to: C3 ≤ η2β 2  σ2 |S|X n=1 α2 n +E   |S|X n=1 αn∇Ln(xn(t)) 2   

    Starting from the expansion in (15), the upper bound is given by: E[L(x(t+ 1))]≤C 1 +C 2 +C 3.(A.1) The termC 3 can be expanded using the variance decompo- sition: C3 = η2β 2  E   |S|X n=1 αn(gn(xn(t))− ∇L n(xn(t))) 2  +E   |S|X n=1 αn∇Ln(xn(t)) 2    . (A.2) Under Assumption 3 (bounded variance), the first term in (A.2) is bounded byσ 2P α2 n,...

    work page