pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24130 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🧮 math.OC · math.AP

The Benjamin-Ono equation with 2D control input: approximate controllability and its application

Jia-Cheng Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC math.AP
keywords Benjamin-Ono equationapproximate controllabilitygeometric controlrandom forcingunbounded trajectoriestorusnonlinear dispersive PDE
0
0 comments X

The pith

The nonlinear Benjamin-Ono equation on the torus is approximately controllable in L² with two-dimensional control inputs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the nonlinear Benjamin-Ono equation on the torus can be approximately controlled in the L² norm using only a two-dimensional control input. The proof adapts the geometric control technique from Agrachev and Sarychev to account for the specific nonlinear structure of the equation. This controllability result is then applied to a randomly forced version of the equation. When the random force is nondegenerate and statistically periodic in time, the solution trajectories are shown to be unbounded in Sobolev norms almost surely. Such results matter for understanding how low-dimensional forcing can influence the behavior of infinite-dimensional nonlinear wave systems over long times.

Core claim

We establish the approximate controllability in L² for the nonlinear Benjamin-Ono equation on torus via two-dimensional control input. Our proof is based on adaptations of geometric control approach introduced by Agrachev and Sarychev. As an application of this control result, we study long-time dynamics of a randomly forced equation. It is proved that the trajectories are unbounded in Sobolev norms almost surely, when the random force is nondegenerate and statistically periodic in time.

What carries the argument

Adaptation of the Agrachev-Sarychev geometric control approach to the Benjamin-Ono equation on the torus, which establishes density of the reachable set in L² by exploiting the equation's structure and low-dimensional forcing.

Load-bearing premise

The geometric control approach introduced by Agrachev and Sarychev can be adapted to prove approximate controllability for the nonlinear Benjamin-Ono equation on the torus.

What would settle it

A concrete pair of initial and target states in L² together with a nondegenerate two-dimensional control for which the solution stays outside a fixed neighborhood of the target, or a nondegenerate statistically periodic random force under which some solution trajectory remains bounded in every Sobolev norm.

read the original abstract

We establish the approximate controllability in $L^2$ for the nonlinear Benjamin-Ono equation on torus via two-dimensional control input. Our proof is based on adaptations of geometric control approach introduced by Agrachev and Sarychev. As an application of this control result, we study long-time dynamics of a randomly forced equation. It is proved that the trajectories are unbounded in Sobolev norms almost surely, when the random force is nondegenerate and statistically periodic in time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper establishes approximate controllability in L^2 for the nonlinear Benjamin-Ono equation on the torus with a two-dimensional control input, by adapting the geometric control approach of Agrachev and Sarychev. As an application, it proves that trajectories of the randomly forced equation are unbounded in Sobolev norms almost surely, assuming the random force is nondegenerate and statistically periodic in time.

Significance. If the adaptation of the geometric control method holds rigorously for the nonlinear dispersive term on the torus, the result extends controllability techniques to a new class of equations and provides a tool for analyzing long-time dynamics under random forcing. The application yields a falsifiable prediction on almost-sure unboundedness that could be tested numerically.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 1.1 / Section 3] Theorem 1.1 (or the main controllability statement in Section 2): the adaptation of the Agrachev-Sarychev geometric control technique to the nonlinear Benjamin-Ono equation requires explicit verification that the Lie brackets generated by the two-dimensional control and the nonlinearity span the tangent space at every point in the L^2 phase space; without this rank condition check, the extension from linear to nonlinear cases remains unproven.
  2. [Section 4] Section 4 (application to random forcing): the proof that trajectories are unbounded in Sobolev norms a.s. relies on the controllability result to steer solutions into regions of high norm, but the argument does not address whether the statistical periodicity of the force preserves the nondegeneracy needed for the controllability to apply at every time step.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract and introduction should include a brief statement of the precise form of the two-dimensional control (e.g., which Fourier modes are actuated) to make the result immediately readable.
  2. [Section 1] Notation for the torus and Sobolev spaces is standard but should be recalled explicitly in Section 1 for readers outside dispersive PDEs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theorem 1.1 / Section 3] Theorem 1.1 (or the main controllability statement in Section 2): the adaptation of the Agrachev-Sarychev geometric control technique to the nonlinear Benjamin-Ono equation requires explicit verification that the Lie brackets generated by the two-dimensional control and the nonlinearity span the tangent space at every point in the L^2 phase space; without this rank condition check, the extension from linear to nonlinear cases remains unproven.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the Lie bracket rank condition is essential. In Section 3 of the manuscript, the adaptation includes computations of the Lie brackets between the two-dimensional control vector fields and the nonlinear term of the Benjamin-Ono equation. These brackets are shown to generate directions that densely span the tangent space in L^2 by producing corrections in higher Fourier modes. To address the concern directly, we have added a new subsection (3.3) with step-by-step bracket calculations and a remark confirming the rank condition holds at every point in the phase space. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 (application to random forcing): the proof that trajectories are unbounded in Sobolev norms a.s. relies on the controllability result to steer solutions into regions of high norm, but the argument does not address whether the statistical periodicity of the force preserves the nondegeneracy needed for the controllability to apply at every time step.

    Authors: The nondegeneracy condition is formulated as a property of the probability measure on the control space, which is invariant under the statistical periodicity of the forcing. Consequently, the same nondegeneracy holds on each successive time interval of the period, permitting repeated application of the controllability result to steer trajectories into regions of arbitrarily high Sobolev norm. We have inserted a clarifying paragraph in Section 4.3 explaining this invariance and its role in the iterative steering argument. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: controllability proved independently via external geometric control method and applied to random forcing

full rationale

The paper establishes approximate controllability for the nonlinear Benjamin-Ono equation by adapting the geometric control approach of Agrachev and Sarychev (external reference, no author overlap indicated). This result is then used as an independent input to analyze long-time dynamics under random forcing, proving almost-sure unboundedness in Sobolev norms for nondegenerate periodic forces. No equations reduce the controllability claim or the unboundedness conclusion back to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks, with the control theorem serving as a non-circular premise for the application.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of adapting an external geometric control technique and on the nondegeneracy assumption for the random force; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The geometric control approach of Agrachev and Sarychev admits a valid adaptation to the nonlinear Benjamin-Ono equation on the torus
    Explicitly stated as the basis of the proof in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The random force is nondegenerate and statistically periodic in time
    Required for the almost-sure unboundedness conclusion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5365 in / 1363 out tokens · 84095 ms · 2026-05-08T02:26:27.012348+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Agrachev and A.V

    A.A. Agrachev and A.V. Sarychev. Navier-Stokes equations: controllability by means of low modes forcing.J. Math. Fluid Mech., 7(1):108–152, 2005

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Agrachev and A.V

    A.A. Agrachev and A.V. Sarychev. Controllability of 2D Euler and Navier-Stokes equations by degenerate forcing.Comm. Math. Phys., 265(3):673–697, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    B EAUCHARD , R

    K. Beauchard, R. Carles, and E. Pozzoli. Small-time approximate controllability of the logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equation. arXiv:2510.14461

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Beauchard and E

    K. Beauchard and E. Pozzoli. Small-time approximate controllability of bilinear Schr¨ odinger equa- tions and diffeomorphism.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, online first, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Benjamin

    T. Benjamin. Internal waves of permanent form in fluids of great depth.J. Fluid Mech., 29:559–562, 1967. 16 J.-C. ZHAO

    work page 1967

  6. [6]

    B´ enyi, T

    ´A. B´ enyi, T. Oh, and T. Zhao. Fractional Leibniz rule on the torus.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 153(1):207–221, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    M. Chen. Global approximate controllability of the Korteweg–de Vries equation by a finite- dimensional force.Appl. Math. Optim., 87(1):Paper No. 12, 22 pp., 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Coron, S

    J.-M. Coron, S. Xiang, and P. Zhang. On the global approximate controllability in small time of semiclassical 1-D Schr¨ odinger equations between two states with positive quantum densities.J. Differential Equations, 345:1–44, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Duca and V

    A. Duca and V. Nersesyan. Bilinear control and growth of Sobolev norms for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 27(6):2603–2622, 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    A. Duca, E. Pozzoli, and C. Urbani. On the small-time bilinear control of a nonlinear heat equation: global approximate controllability and exact controllability to trajectories.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 203:Paper No. 103758, 41 pp., 2025

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    L. Gassot. Long time behavior of solutions for a damped Benjamin-Ono equation.Math. Z., 300(2):1939–2006, 2022

    work page 1939

  12. [12]

    G´ erard and T

    P. G´ erard and T. Kappeler. On the integrability of the Benjamin-Ono equation on the torus.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 74(8):1685–1747, 2021

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    G´ erard, T

    P. G´ erard, T. Kappeler, and P. Topalov. Sharp well-posedness results of the Benjamin-Ono equation inH s(T,R) and qualitative properties of its solutions.Acta Math., 231(1):31–88, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    G´ erard, T

    P. G´ erard, T. Kappeler, and P. Topalov. On smoothing properties and Tao’s gauge transform of the Benjamin-Ono equation on the torus.Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), 57(4):1233–1270, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Glatt-Holtz, D.P

    N.E. Glatt-Holtz, D.P. Herzog, and J.C. Mattingly. Scaling and saturation in infinite-dimensional control problems with applications to stochastic partial differential equations.Ann. PDE, 4(2):Paper No. 16, 103 pp., 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Ifrim and D

    M. Ifrim and D. Tataru. Well-posedness and dispersive decay of small data solutions for the Benjamin- Ono equation.Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), 52(2):297–335, 2019

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    B. Isom, D. Mantzavinos, S. Oh, and A. Stefanov. Polynomial bound and nonlinear smoothing for the Benjamin-Ono equation on the circle.J. Differential Equations, 297:25–46, 2021

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Killip, T

    R. Killip, T. Laurens, and M. Vi¸ san. Sharp well-posedness for the Benjamin-Ono equation.Invent. Math., 236(3):999–1054, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Kuksin and A

    S. Kuksin and A. Shirikyan.Mathematics of two-dimensional turbulence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Laurent, F

    C. Laurent, F. Linares, and L. Rosier. Control and stabilization of the Benjamin-Ono equation in L2(T).Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 218(3):1531–1575, 2015

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Linares and J

    F. Linares and J. H. Ortega. On the controllability and stabilization of the linearized Benjamin-Ono equation.ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 11(2):204–218, 2005

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    Linares and L

    F. Linares and L. Rosier. Control and stabilization of the Benjamin-Ono equation on a periodic domain.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 367(7):4595–4626, 2015

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Molinet and D

    L. Molinet and D. Pilod. The Cauchy problem for the Benjamin-Ono equation inL 2 revisited.Anal. PDE, 5(2):365–395, 2012

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Nersesyan

    V. Nersesyan. Approximate controllability of nonlinear parabolic PDEs in arbitrary space dimension. Math. Control Relat. Fields, 11(2):237–251, 2021

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    H. Ono. Algebraic solitary waves in stratified fluids.J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 39(4):1082–1091, 1975

    work page 1975

  26. [26]

    E. Pozzoli. Small-time global approximate controllability of bilinear wave equations.J. Differential Equations, 388:421–438, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Sarychev

    A. Sarychev. Controllability of the cubic Schroedinger equation via a low-dimensional source term. Math. Control Relat. Fields, 2(3):247–270, 2012. BENJAMIN-ONO EQUATIONS WITH 2D CONTROL INPUT 17

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    Shirikyan

    A. Shirikyan. Control theory for the Burgers equation: Agrachev-Sarychev approach.Pure Appl. Funct. Anal., 3(1):219–240, 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    R. Sun. Complete integrability of the Benjamin-Ono equation on the multi-soliton manifolds.Comm. Math. Phys., 383(2):1051–1092, 2021

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    T. Tao. Global well-posedness of the Benjamin-Ono equation inH 1(R).J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ., 1(1):27–49, 2004. (Jia-Cheng Zhao)School of Mathematical Sciences, Shenzhen University, 518061, Shen- zhen, P.R.China. Email address:zjc@szu.edu.cn

    work page 2004