arxiv: 2604.24873 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Amplitudes in self-dual (higher-spin) theories

Mattia Serrani , Evgeny Skvortsov

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords self-dual theorieshigher-spin fieldstree-level amplitudesKleinian signaturecelestial holographychiral higher-spin gravityscattering amplitudesvector model duality

0 comments

The pith

Self-dual theories with massless higher-spin fields have nontrivial tree-level amplitudes in Kleinian signature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Self-dual theories serve as simplified models for more complete interacting theories. The paper shows that extending these models to include massless higher-spin fields does not eliminate their tree-level scattering amplitudes when working in Kleinian signature or complex Minkowski kinematics. The demonstration relies on extending a recent amplitude construction to the full infinite tower of spins. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies a key consistency check for these theories and supplies the missing element needed to finish the celestial version of the vector-model duality for chiral higher-spin gravity.

Core claim

Following the recent amplitude construction, all self-dual theories, including those with massless higher-spin fields, have nontrivial tree-level amplitudes in Kleinian signature or complex Minkowski kinematics. The maximal such theory is chiral higher-spin gravity, and the nontriviality of its amplitudes provides the missing ingredient to complete the celestial analogue of the vector-model/higher-spin AdS/CFT duality.

What carries the argument

Extension of the self-dual amplitude construction to the infinite tower of higher-spin fields, which generates explicit tree-level scattering processes in Kleinian or complex kinematics.

If this is right

Nontrivial tree-level amplitudes exist for every self-dual theory that includes higher-spin fields.
Chiral higher-spin gravity yields concrete nontrivial amplitudes required by celestial holography.
The celestial analogue of the vector-model/higher-spin AdS/CFT duality is completed once these amplitudes are included.
Self-dual theories continue to function as consistent toy models even after the addition of the full higher-spin tower.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Amplitude methods may serve as a practical probe for the internal consistency of higher-spin extensions without needing the full spacetime equations of motion.
Similar constructions could be tested in other signatures or at loop level to map the range of validity of self-dual higher-spin models.

Load-bearing premise

The self-dual higher-spin theories remain consistent and the amplitude construction extends to the infinite tower without obstruction.

What would settle it

An explicit computation that produces vanishing amplitudes for a higher-spin self-dual vertex or that encounters an inconsistency at finite spin level would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24873 by Evgeny Skvortsov, Mattia Serrani.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The map of SD-theories with a few basic ones: SDYM, HS-SDYM, SDGR, HS-SDGR view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Self-dual theories are powerful toy models of their completions. It was shown recently that there are infinitely many SD-theories once massless higher-spin fields are allowed. The maximal SD-theory is chiral higher-spin gravity. Following the recent [arxiv:2602.12176] we show that all SD-theories, including those with massless higher-spin fields, have nontrivial tree-level amplitudes in Kleinian signature or complex Minkowski kinematics. Within celestial holography, the nontriviality of amplitudes in chiral higher-spin gravity provides the missing ingredient needed to complete the celestial analogue of the vector-model/higher-spin AdS/CFT duality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper extends the tree-level amplitude construction from arxiv:2602.12176 to the full family of self-dual theories with higher spins, showing the amplitudes stay nontrivial in Kleinian or complex kinematics.

read the letter

The main result is that every self-dual theory, including the maximal one with an infinite tower of massless higher-spin fields, produces nonzero tree-level amplitudes once the right kinematics are used. The authors take the formula from the cited recent paper and apply it across the family, including chiral higher-spin gravity and its truncations. This is presented as a direct calculation rather than a new framework, and it lands cleanly on the celestial holography motivation: the nontrivial amplitudes supply the scattering data needed for the celestial analogue of the higher-spin vector-model duality. That link is the clearest payoff. The paper does a solid job of keeping the argument short and tied to the prior work, so the extension itself is the new piece. It avoids overclaiming by staying within the self-dual setup and the specified signatures. A soft spot is the reliance on the infinite sum over spins not introducing extra cancellations or consistency problems that the finite-spin cases avoided. The abstract and structure treat the carry-over as straightforward, but anyone checking the higher-spin vertices will want to see the explicit steps to confirm no new on-shell constraints appear. The Kleinian signature choice is standard here, though it limits immediate physical interpretation. The citations are appropriate and focused on the immediate predecessor. This is aimed at people already working on higher-spin gravity or celestial amplitudes. A reader outside that niche will need the background from the referenced paper to follow the details. It deserves peer review because the claim is concrete, the extension is new for the higher-spin case, and the result is falsifiable within the existing formalism.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that all self-dual theories, including those with massless higher-spin fields and the maximal chiral higher-spin gravity, possess nontrivial tree-level amplitudes in Kleinian signature or complex Minkowski kinematics. This follows directly from extending the amplitude construction of arXiv:2602.12176, and the nontriviality is presented as the missing ingredient required to complete the celestial analogue of the vector-model/higher-spin AdS/CFT duality.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the result would establish that self-dual higher-spin theories carry nontrivial perturbative scattering data even when an infinite tower of fields is included. This strengthens their utility as toy models and supplies a concrete technical step toward celestial holography dualities. The work explicitly credits the prior construction and isolates the higher-spin extension as the novel element.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3: The assertion that the tree-level formulas of arXiv:2602.12176 carry over verbatim to the infinite higher-spin tower is not accompanied by an explicit verification that the infinite sum over spins does not generate new on-shell constraints or Ward identities capable of cancelling the would-be nonzero amplitudes for s>2.
[§4.1] §4.1, paragraph following Eq. (12): The claim that Kleinian signature preserves the reality properties and helicity counting for higher-spin fields is stated without a direct check against the known differences in the number of independent degrees of freedom for s>2 in (2,2) signature.

minor comments (2)

The abstract and introduction could more explicitly separate the finite-spin truncations (where the prior result applies directly) from the maximal infinite-tower case.
[§2] Notation for the self-dual vertices in the infinite-sum limit is introduced without a dedicated equation defining the convergence or regularization procedure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: §3: The assertion that the tree-level formulas of arXiv:2602.12176 carry over verbatim to the infinite higher-spin tower is not accompanied by an explicit verification that the infinite sum over spins does not generate new on-shell constraints or Ward identities capable of cancelling the would-be nonzero amplitudes for s>2.

Authors: The construction of arXiv:2602.12176 defines amplitudes spin-by-spin using self-dual vertices that do not mix different spins. The infinite tower in our work is therefore a direct sum of independent sectors, with on-shell conditions and Ward identities likewise factorizing per spin. No cross-spin cancellations arise because the chiral self-dual interactions preserve the non-vanishing color-ordered structures for each s. We have added a short explicit paragraph in the revised §3 confirming this factorization and the absence of new constraints from the sum. revision: yes
Referee: §4.1, paragraph following Eq. (12): The claim that Kleinian signature preserves the reality properties and helicity counting for higher-spin fields is stated without a direct check against the known differences in the number of independent degrees of freedom for s>2 in (2,2) signature.

Authors: In the self-dual formulation the reality conditions are imposed uniformly via the self-duality constraint, which reduces the components consistently for all spins and yields the same helicity counting as in the complex case. This matches the known (2,2) counting once self-duality is enforced. We have expanded the paragraph after Eq. (12) in the revised manuscript to include a brief comparison with the literature on higher-spin degrees of freedom in (2,2) signature, making the preservation explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: result is an application of external construction to new theories

full rationale

The paper states that it follows the amplitude construction of arXiv:2602.12176 to demonstrate nontrivial tree-level amplitudes for all self-dual theories, including those with higher-spin fields. This is presented as a direct extension rather than a re-derivation or redefinition of the input quantities. No equations or claims in the abstract reduce the nontriviality result to a tautology, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a self-citation chain whose validity is presupposed without external support. The existence of the theories is cited as prior work, but the central amplitude claim remains an independent calculation step whose validity can be checked against the referenced method and external benchmarks such as explicit vertex computations or on-shell conditions. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and does not collapse to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard assumptions of Lorentz-invariant field theory, self-duality constraints, and the validity of the amplitude construction in the referenced paper; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the summary.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Self-dual theories are consistent field theories whose interactions are restricted to one helicity sector.
Invoked in the opening sentence as the starting point for the family of theories.
domain assumption Tree-level amplitudes in Kleinian or complex Minkowski kinematics are well-defined and can be computed by the method of arxiv:2602.12176.
The central claim rests on extending that prior construction without additional obstructions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5394 in / 1325 out tokens · 33561 ms · 2026-05-08T02:20:00.442123+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages

[1]

Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,

D. Ponomarev and E. D. Skvortsov, “Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,”J. Phys.A50 (2017), no. 9, 095401,1609.04655

work page arXiv 2017
[2]

Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality

D. Ponomarev, “Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality,”JHEP12(2017) 141,1710.00270

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[3]

Actions for Self-dual Higher Spin Gravities,

K. Krasnov, E. Skvortsov, and T. Tran, “Actions for Self-dual Higher Spin Gravities,”2105.12782

work page arXiv
[4]

From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras,

R. Monteiro, “From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras,”JHEP 03(2023) 062,2212.11266

work page arXiv 2023
[5]

Chiral higher-spin double copy,

D. Ponomarev, “Chiral higher-spin double copy,”JHEP01(2025) 143,2409.19449

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

Serrani,On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space,JHEP08, 032 (2025) [arXiv:2505.12839 [hep-th]]

M. Serrani, “On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space,”JHEP08(2025) 032, 2505.12839

work page arXiv 2025
[7]

Massless fields with integer spin,

C. Fronsdal, “Massless fields with integer spin,”Phys. Rev.D18(1978) 3624

1978
[8]

Candidate to the role of higher spin symmetry,

E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, “Candidate to the role of higher spin symmetry,”Ann. Phys.177 (1987) 63

1987
[9]

One Massless Particle Equals Two Dirac Singletons: Elementary Particles in a Curved Space. 6.,

M. Flato and C. Fronsdal, “One Massless Particle Equals Two Dirac Singletons: Elementary Particles in a Curved Space. 6.,”Lett.Math.Phys.2(1978) 421–426

1978
[10]

On spin three selfinteractions,

F. A. Berends, G. J. H. Burgers, and H. Van Dam, “On spin three selfinteractions,”Z. Phys.C24 (1984) 247–254

1984
[11]

Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry,

J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, “Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry,”1112.1016

work page arXiv
[12]

On the uniqueness of higher-spin symmetries in AdS and CFT,

N. Boulanger, D. Ponomarev, E. D. Skvortsov, and M. Taronna, “On the uniqueness of higher-spin symmetries in AdS and CFT,”Int. J. Mod. Phys.A28(2013) 1350162,1305.5180

work page arXiv 2013
[13]

A Consistent Interacting Massless Higher Spin Field Theory inD= (2+1),

M. Blencowe, “A Consistent Interacting Massless Higher Spin Field Theory inD= (2+1),” Class.Quant.Grav.6(1989) 443. 33

1989
[14]

Area Preserving Diffeomorphisms and Higher Spin Algebra,

E. Bergshoeff, M. P. Blencowe, and K. S. Stelle, “Area Preserving Diffeomorphisms and Higher Spin Algebra,”Commun. Math. Phys.128(1990) 213

1990
[15]

Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields

A. Campoleoni, S. Fredenhagen, S. Pfenninger, and S. Theisen, “Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields,”JHEP1011(2010) 007,1008.4744

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[16]

Nonlinear W(infinity) Algebra as Asymptotic Symmetry of Three-Dimensional Higher Spin Anti-de Sitter Gravity

M. Henneaux and S.-J. Rey, “NonlinearW ∞ as Asymptotic Symmetry of Three-Dimensional Higher Spin Anti-de Sitter Gravity,”JHEP1012(2010) 007,1008.4579

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[17]

Matter-free higher spin gravities in 3D: Partially-massless fields and general structure,

M. Grigoriev, K. Mkrtchyan, and E. Skvortsov, “Matter-free higher spin gravities in 3D: Partially-massless fields and general structure,”Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 6, 066003,2005.05931

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

Conformal Higher Spin in (2+1)-dimensions,

C. N. Pope and P. K. Townsend, “Conformal Higher Spin in (2+1)-dimensions,”Phys. Lett.B225 (1989) 245–250

1989
[19]

A Superconformal Theory of Massless Higher Spin Fields inD= (2+1),

E. S. Fradkin and V. Ya. Linetsky, “A Superconformal Theory of Massless Higher Spin Fields inD= (2+1),”Mod. Phys. Lett.A4(1989) 731. [Annals Phys.198,293(1990)]

1989
[20]

New Conformal Higher Spin Gravities in 3d,

M. Grigoriev, I. Lovrekovic, and E. Skvortsov, “New Conformal Higher Spin Gravities in 3d,”JHEP01 (2020) 059,1909.13305

work page arXiv 2020
[21]

Massless chiral fields in six dimensions,

T. Basile, “Massless chiral fields in six dimensions,”SciPost Phys.19(2025), no. 3, 079,2409.12800

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

More on Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

E. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia, “More on Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,”Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 10, 106001,2002.08487

work page arXiv 2020
[23]

Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

E. D. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia, “Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018), no. 3, 031601,1805.00048

work page arXiv 2018
[24]

One-loop Finiteness of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

E. Skvortsov and T. Tran, “One-loop Finiteness of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,”2004.10797

work page arXiv 2004
[25]

Supersymmetric quantum chiral higher spin gravity,

M. Tsulaia and D. Weissman, “Supersymmetric quantum chiral higher spin gravity,”JHEP12(2022) 002,2209.13907

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

Invariant traces of the flat space chiral higher-spin algebra as scattering amplitudes,

D. Ponomarev, “Invariant traces of the flat space chiral higher-spin algebra as scattering amplitudes,” JHEP09(2022) 086,2205.09654

work page arXiv 2022
[27]

Strong obstruction of the Berends-Burgers-van Dam spin-3 vertex,

X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, and S. Leclercq, “Strong obstruction of the Berends-Burgers-van Dam spin-3 vertex,”J.Phys.A43(2010) 185401,1002.0289

work page arXiv 2010
[28]

On four-point interactions in massless higher spin theory in flat space,

R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin, “On four-point interactions in massless higher spin theory in flat space,” JHEP04(2017) 139,1701.05773

work page arXiv 2017
[29]

Massless spinning fields on the Light-Front: quartic vertices and amplitudes,

M. Serrani, “Massless spinning fields on the Light-Front: quartic vertices and amplitudes,”2602.12826

work page arXiv
[30]

On the Structure of Quartic Vertices for Massless Higher Spin Fields on Minkowski Background,

P. Dempster and M. Tsulaia, “On the Structure of Quartic Vertices for Massless Higher Spin Fields on Minkowski Background,”Nucl. Phys.B865(2012) 353–375,1203.5597

work page arXiv 2012
[31]

Quartic AdS Interactions in Higher-Spin Gravity from Conformal Field Theory,

X. Bekaert, J. Erdmenger, D. Ponomarev, and C. Sleight, “Quartic AdS Interactions in Higher-Spin Gravity from Conformal Field Theory,”JHEP11(2015) 149,1508.04292

work page arXiv 2015
[32]

Looking for a bulk point,

J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov, “Looking for a bulk point,”JHEP01(2017) 013, 1509.03612

work page arXiv 2017
[33]

Higher-Spin Gauge Theories and Bulk Locality,

C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Higher-Spin Gauge Theories and Bulk Locality,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018), no. 17, 171604,1704.07859

work page arXiv 2018
[34]

A Note on (Non)-Locality in Holographic Higher Spin Theories,

D. Ponomarev, “A Note on (Non)-Locality in Holographic Higher Spin Theories,”Universe4(2018), no. 1, 2,1710.00403. 34

work page arXiv 2018
[35]

Matter-coupled higher spin gravities in 3d: no- and yes-go results,

A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, and A. Sukhanov, “Matter-coupled higher spin gravities in 3d: no- and yes-go results,”JHEP04(2025) 155,2409.12830

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Higher-Spin Poisson Sigma Models and Holographic Duality for SYK Models,

X. Bekaert, A. Sharapov, and E. Skvortsov, “Higher-Spin Poisson Sigma Models and Holographic Duality for SYK Models,”2509.19964

work page arXiv
[37]

On higher spin extension of the Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity model,

K. Alkalaev, “On higher spin extension of the Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity model,”J.Phys.A47(2014) 365401,1311.5119

work page arXiv 2014
[38]

On BF-type higher-spin actions in two dimensions,

K. Alkalaev and X. Bekaert, “On BF-type higher-spin actions in two dimensions,”JHEP05(2020) 158, 2002.02387

work page arXiv 2020
[39]

Towards higher-spin AdS 2/CFT1 holography,

K. Alkalaev and X. Bekaert, “Towards higher-spin AdS 2/CFT1 holography,”JHEP04(2020) 206, 1911.13212

work page arXiv 2020
[40]

Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,

R. R. Metsaev, “Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,”Mod. Phys. Lett.A6(1991) 359–367

1991
[41]

Smatrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,

R. R. Metsaev, “Smatrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,” Mod. Phys. Lett.A6(1991) 2411–2421

1991
[42]

Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality,

M. Serrani, “Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality,”JHEP04(2026) 047, 2508.16804

work page arXiv 2026
[43]

On effective field theories with celestial duals,

L. Ren, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant, and A. Volovich, “On effective field theories with celestial duals,”JHEP08(2022) 251,2206.08322

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

The kinematic algebra from the self-dual sector,

R. Monteiro and D. O’Connell, “The kinematic algebra from the self-dual sector,”Journal of High Energy Physics2011(July, 2011)

2011
[45]

Interacting fields of arbitrary spin andN >4 supersymmetric selfdual Yang-Mills equations,

C. Devchand and V. Ogievetsky, “Interacting fields of arbitrary spin andN >4 supersymmetric selfdual Yang-Mills equations,”Nucl. Phys. B481(1996) 188–214,hep-th/9606027

work page arXiv 1996
[46]

Chiral higher spin gravity in (A)dS4 and secrets of Chern–Simons matter theories,

A. Sharapov and E. Skvortsov, “Chiral higher spin gravity in (A)dS4 and secrets of Chern–Simons matter theories,”Nucl. Phys. B985(2022) 115982,2205.15293

work page arXiv 2022
[47]

A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories,

O. Aharony, R. R. Kalloor, and T. Kukolj, “A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories,”JHEP10 (2024) 051,2405.01647

work page arXiv 2024
[48]

Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,

S. Jain, D. K. S, and E. Skvortsov, “Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,”Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 10, 106017,2405.00773

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

Color/kinematics duality in AdS 4,

C. Armstrong, A. E. Lipstein, and J. Mei, “Color/kinematics duality in AdS 4,”JHEP02(2021) 194, 2012.02059

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

Light-cone actions and correlators of self-dual theories in AdS 4,

C. Chowdhury, G. Doran, A. Lipstein, R. Monteiro, S. Nagy, and K. Singh, “Light-cone actions and correlators of self-dual theories in AdS 4,”JHEP01(2025) 172,2411.04172

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

Dirichlet, Neumann, Mixed and self-dual holography: (self-dual) Yang-Mills theory,

E. Skvortsov and R. Van Dongen, “Dirichlet, Neumann, Mixed and self-dual holography: (self-dual) Yang-Mills theory,”2602.21658

work page arXiv
[52]

Guevara, A

A. Guevara, A. Lupsasca, D. Skinner, A. Strominger, and K. Weil, “Single-minus gluon tree amplitudes are nonzero,”2602.12176

work page arXiv
[53]

Single-minus graviton tree amplitudes are nonzero,

A. Guevara, A. Lupsasca, D. Skinner, A. Strominger, and K. Weil, “Single-minus graviton tree amplitudes are nonzero,”2603.04330. 35

work page arXiv
[54]

Factorization of tree QCD amplitudes in the high-energy limit and in the collinear limit,

V. Del Duca, A. Frizzo, and F. Maltoni, “Factorization of tree QCD amplitudes in the high-energy limit and in the collinear limit,”Nucl. Phys. B568(2000) 211–262,hep-ph/9909464

work page arXiv 2000
[55]

New color decompositions for gauge amplitudes at tree and loop level,

V. Del Duca, L. J. Dixon, and F. Maltoni, “New color decompositions for gauge amplitudes at tree and loop level,”Nucl. Phys. B571(2000) 51–70,hep-ph/9910563

work page arXiv 2000
[56]

The Kinematic Algebra From the Self-Dual Sector,

R. Monteiro and D. O’Connell, “The Kinematic Algebra From the Self-Dual Sector,”JHEP07(2011) 007,1105.2565

work page arXiv 2011
[57]

AdS Dual of the Critical O(N) Vector Model

I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “AdS dual of the criticalO(N) vector model,”Phys. Lett.B550 (2002) 213–219,hep-th/0210114

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[58]

Massless higher spins and holography,

E. Sezgin and P. Sundell, “Massless higher spins and holography,”Nucl.Phys.B644(2002) 303–370, hep-th/0205131

work page arXiv 2002
[59]

Holography of the N=1 higher spin theory on AdS(4),

R. G. Leigh and A. C. Petkou, “Holography of the N=1 higher spin theory on AdS(4),”JHEP06(2003) 011,hep-th/0304217

work page arXiv 2003
[60]

Chiral higher-spin holography in flat space: the Flato-Fronsdal theorem and lower-point functions,

D. Ponomarev, “Chiral higher-spin holography in flat space: the Flato-Fronsdal theorem and lower-point functions,”JHEP01(2023) 048,2210.04036

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

Towards higher-spin holography in flat space,

D. Ponomarev, “Towards higher-spin holography in flat space,”JHEP01(2023) 084,2210.04035

work page arXiv 2023
[62]

The Selfdual sector of QCD amplitudes,

G. Chalmers and W. Siegel, “The Selfdual sector of QCD amplitudes,”Phys. Rev.D54(1996) 7628–7633,hep-th/9606061

work page arXiv 1996
[63]

Recursive Calculations for Processes with n Gluons,

F. A. Berends and W. T. Giele, “Recursive Calculations for Processes with n Gluons,”Nucl. Phys. B 306(1988) 759–808

1988
[64]

Zero rest mass fields including gravitation: Asymptotic behavior,

R. Penrose, “Zero rest mass fields including gravitation: Asymptotic behavior,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A284(1965) 159

1965
[65]

L. P. Hughston, R. S. Ward, M. G. Eastwood, M. L. Ginsberg, A. P. Hodges, S. A. Huggett, T. R. Hurd, R. O. Jozsa, R. Penrose, A. Popovich,et al., eds.,Advances in twistor theory. 1979

1979
[66]

Cohomology and Massless Fields,

M. G. Eastwood, R. Penrose, and R. O. Wells, “Cohomology and Massless Fields,”Commun. Math. Phys.78(1981) 305–351

1981
[67]

Real methods in twistor theory,

N. M. J. Woodhouse, “Real methods in twistor theory,”Class. Quant. Grav.2(1985) 257–291

1985
[68]

On amplitudes in Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

R. Guarini, “On amplitudes in Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,”2603.06044

work page arXiv
[69]

Constraining higher-spin S-matrices,

T. Tran, “Constraining higher-spin S-matrices,”JHEP02(2023) 001,2212.02540

work page arXiv 2023
[70]

Cubic interaction terms for arbitrary spin,

A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and L. Brink, “Cubic interaction terms for arbitrary spin,”Nucl. Phys.B227(1983) 31

1983
[71]

Interacting Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front,

A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and N. Linden, “Interacting Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front,”Class. Quant. Grav.4(1987) 1333

1987
[72]

Ponomarev, Int

D. Ponomarev, “Basic Introduction to Higher-Spin Theories,”Int. J. Theor. Phys.62(2023), no. 7, 146, 2206.15385

work page arXiv 2023
[73]

Penrose and W

R. Penrose and W. Rindler,Spinors and Space-Time, vol. 1 ofCambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 1984

1984
[74]

Exploring the S-Matrix of Massless Particles,

P. Benincasa and E. Conde, “Exploring the S-Matrix of Massless Particles,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 025007,1108.3078. 36

work page arXiv 2012
[75]

Perturbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory,

Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, “Perturbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 061602,1004.0476

work page arXiv 2010
[76]

The Moyal algebra and integrable deformations of the selfdual Einstein equations,

I. A. B. Strachan, “The Moyal algebra and integrable deformations of the selfdual Einstein equations,” Phys. Lett. B283(1992) 63–66

1992
[77]

Moyal deformations, W 1+∞ and celestial holography,

W. Bu, S. Heuveline, and D. Skinner, “Moyal deformations, W 1+∞ and celestial holography,”JHEP12 (2022) 011,2208.13750

work page arXiv 2022
[78]

The celestial chiral algebra of self-dual gravity on Eguchi-Hanson space,

R. Bittleston, S. Heuveline, and D. Skinner, “The celestial chiral algebra of self-dual gravity on Eguchi-Hanson space,”JHEP09(2023) 008,2305.09451

work page arXiv 2023
[79]

Extended higher spin superalgebras and their massless representations,

S. E. Konstein and M. A. Vasiliev, “Extended higher spin superalgebras and their massless representations,”Nucl. Phys.B331(1990) 475–499

1990
[80]

Twistor constructions for higher-spin extensions of (self-dual) Yang-Mills,

T. Tran, “Twistor constructions for higher-spin extensions of (self-dual) Yang-Mills,”JHEP11(2021) 117,2107.04500

work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.