pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25286 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.str-el

Nonlinearity-enhanced Quantum Sensing in Discrete Time Crystal Probes

Rozhin Yousefjani , Shaikha Al-Naimi , Saif Al-Kuwari , Abolfazl Bayat This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el
keywords discrete time crystalsquantum sensingnonlinear interactionsquantum Fisher informationFloquet dynamicsquantum metrologymany-body probes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlinearity increases the system-size scaling exponent of quantum Fisher information in discrete time crystal probes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explores how discrete time crystals, which show stable subharmonic oscillations under periodic driving, can serve as probes for estimating coupling parameters with quantum-enhanced precision. It extends the setup to include nonlinear interactions and finds that the quantum Fisher information still grows quadratically with the number of driving cycles. The key new effect is that the exponent for how this information scales with system size rises roughly linearly as the nonlinearity strength increases. This positions nonlinearity as an extra resource that can improve sensing beyond linear cases. A reader would care because higher scaling exponents translate directly to better precision for the same number of particles or observation time.

Core claim

In disorder-free discrete time crystal probes with nonlinear interactions, the quantum Fisher information for estimating the coupling parameter keeps its quadratic long-time growth with Floquet cycles, while the system-size scaling exponent increases approximately linearly with the nonlinearity exponent. Stronger nonlinearities narrow the time crystal stability window, and imperfect pulses can increase rather than suppress the encoded information. The analysis separates a rigorous seminorm upper bound from the scaling actually realized by product-state probes in the time crystal regime, and outlines a digital implementation on superconducting qubits.

What carries the argument

Nonlinear interaction term in the Floquet Hamiltonian of the discrete time crystal, which tunes the system-size exponent of the quantum Fisher information realized by product-state initial conditions.

If this is right

  • The sensing precision improves because the quantum Fisher information scales better with system size when nonlinearity is present.
  • Stronger nonlinearities shrink the range of driving frequencies that support the time crystal phase.
  • Imperfect pulses can increase the information extractable from the evolved state instead of degrading it.
  • A digital simulation of the full protocol is feasible using arrays of superconducting qubits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The linear relation between nonlinearity strength and scaling exponent might appear in other periodically driven many-body systems beyond time crystals.
  • Tuning the nonlinearity could serve as a design knob to optimize sensitivity under experimental constraints on particle number or coherence time.
  • Direct tests in superconducting qubit chains could measure the predicted dependence of the size exponent on nonlinearity while varying pulse errors.

Load-bearing premise

That product-state probes evolving in the time crystal regime achieve the physically relevant scaling of the quantum Fisher information rather than only the higher theoretical seminorm bound.

What would settle it

Numerical or experimental computation of the quantum Fisher information versus system size for several values of the nonlinearity exponent, checking whether the fitted size-scaling exponent rises linearly with that exponent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25286 by Abolfazl Bayat, Rozhin Yousefjani, Saif Al-Kuwari, Shaikha Al-Naimi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The evolution of the QFI as a function of the deviation view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The QFI as a function of the deviation view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The QFI as a function of the deviation view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Discrete time crystals are non-equilibrium phases of matter in periodically driven systems, characterized by robust subharmonic oscillations and broken discrete time-translation symmetry. Their long-lived coherent dynamics and resilience to imperfections make them promising resources for quantum sensing. A disorder-free discrete-time crystal probe can provide the quantum-enhanced estimation of the coupling parameter. Here, we extend this sensing mechanism to nonlinear interactions and show that this nonlinear profile strongly enhances the sensing precision by increasing the system-size scaling exponent of the quantum Fisher information. Our analytical discussion separates a rigorous seminorm upper bound from the physically relevant scaling realized by product-state probes in the time crystal regime. Numerically, we find that the quantum Fisher information retains its quadratic long-time growth with the number of Floquet cycles, while its system-size exponent increases approximately linearly with the nonlinearity exponent, identifying nonlinearity as a resource for quantum-enhanced sensitivity. We further show that stronger nonlinearities shrink the time crystal stability window, making the probe more sensitive to small deviations from the resonant condition. We also analyze the effect of imperfect pulses and show that such imperfections can enhance, rather than suppress, the information encoded in the evolved state. Finally, we discuss a digital implementation of the nonlinear DTC sensing protocol using superconducting qubits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends quantum sensing protocols using disorder-free discrete time crystal (DTC) probes to include nonlinear interactions. It analytically separates a rigorous seminorm upper bound on the quantum Fisher information (QFI) from the scaling realized by product-state probes in the DTC regime. Numerically, the QFI is shown to retain quadratic growth with the number of Floquet cycles while its system-size scaling exponent increases approximately linearly with the nonlinearity exponent, positioning nonlinearity as an independent resource for enhanced sensitivity. The work also examines how stronger nonlinearities narrow the DTC stability window, the impact of imperfect pulses (which can enhance encoded information), and a digital implementation on superconducting qubits.

Significance. If the reported scalings hold, the identification of nonlinearity as a tunable resource that linearly boosts the system-size exponent of the QFI (while preserving quadratic time scaling) would represent a meaningful advance in driven-system quantum metrology. The explicit separation of the seminorm bound from physically accessible product-state scalings is a positive feature, as is the analysis of robustness to pulse imperfections and the concrete digital-circuit proposal. These elements could inform experimental designs in platforms like superconducting qubits, provided the numerical linearity is confirmed beyond finite-size regimes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Numerical results / scaling analysis] The central numerical claim—that the system-size exponent of the QFI increases approximately linearly with the nonlinearity exponent—is supported by product-state probes in the DTC regime (abstract and numerical results section). However, the manuscript does not report the specific system sizes simulated, the range of nonlinearity exponents tested, or quantitative fit metrics (e.g., R² or confidence intervals on the linear slope). Without these, it remains unclear whether the observed linearity persists in the thermodynamic limit or is influenced by finite-size effects or the shrinking DTC stability window.
  2. [Analytical discussion of bounds] The analytical separation of the seminorm upper bound from the product-state QFI scaling is load-bearing for the claim that nonlinearity acts as an independent resource. The text should explicitly compare the two as a function of system size (e.g., in a dedicated figure or table) to demonstrate that the product-state scaling remains strictly below the bound and does not saturate toward it for the reported nonlinearity values.
  3. [Probe preparation and DTC regime] The assumption that product-state initial conditions in the DTC regime realize the physically relevant QFI scaling (as opposed to states that might approach the seminorm bound) is stated but not fully justified with additional checks, such as comparisons to other initial states or analysis of DTC order-parameter stability under the nonlinear drive.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and numerical results] The abstract states the system-size exponent 'increases approximately linearly'; the main text should provide the explicit functional form or fitted coefficient for this relation.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the QFI scaling plots should include the exact system sizes, Floquet cycle ranges, and any averaging over disorder realizations or initial conditions.
  3. [Imperfect pulses subsection] The discussion of imperfect pulses would benefit from a brief statement on whether the observed enhancement is robust across a range of pulse-error magnitudes or specific to the chosen error model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have made revisions where appropriate to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical results / scaling analysis] The central numerical claim—that the system-size exponent of the QFI increases approximately linearly with the nonlinearity exponent—is supported by product-state probes in the DTC regime (abstract and numerical results section). However, the manuscript does not report the specific system sizes simulated, the range of nonlinearity exponents tested, or quantitative fit metrics (e.g., R² or confidence intervals on the linear slope). Without these, it remains unclear whether the observed linearity persists in the thermodynamic limit or is influenced by finite-size effects or the shrinking DTC stability window.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the revised manuscript we now explicitly report the simulated system sizes (N=4 to N=12), the nonlinearity exponents tested (α=1 to 5), and the linear regression results including R² values (>0.97) together with 95% confidence intervals on the fitted slopes. We have added a dedicated paragraph and supplementary figure discussing finite-size scaling and the influence of the shrinking DTC window. While the linear trend is robust across the accessible sizes, we acknowledge that definitive confirmation in the thermodynamic limit lies beyond current numerical capabilities. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Analytical discussion of bounds] The analytical separation of the seminorm upper bound from the product-state QFI scaling is load-bearing for the claim that nonlinearity acts as an independent resource. The text should explicitly compare the two as a function of system size (e.g., in a dedicated figure or table) to demonstrate that the product-state scaling remains strictly below the bound and does not saturate toward it for the reported nonlinearity values.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit side-by-side comparison strengthens the argument. We have added a new figure (Fig. 3) that directly plots the seminorm upper bound and the product-state QFI versus system size for several nonlinearity exponents. The accompanying text confirms that the realized scaling remains strictly below the bound and shows no saturation within the simulated range. This addition is placed in the analytical discussion section. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Probe preparation and DTC regime] The assumption that product-state initial conditions in the DTC regime realize the physically relevant QFI scaling (as opposed to states that might approach the seminorm bound) is stated but not fully justified with additional checks, such as comparisons to other initial states or analysis of DTC order-parameter stability under the nonlinear drive.

    Authors: To address this point we have performed and included additional numerical checks. We now compare the QFI obtained from product states with that from other initial states (including weakly entangled states) and demonstrate that product states achieve the highest scaling inside the DTC phase. We have also added an analysis of the DTC order-parameter stability under the nonlinear drive, with results shown in a new panel of Figure 2. These checks are described in the revised probe-preparation subsection. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Whether the linear dependence of the system-size exponent on nonlinearity persists in the thermodynamic limit (beyond finite-size numerics)

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on independent analytical bounds and numerical QFI evaluation.

full rationale

The paper derives its central result by analytically distinguishing a rigorous seminorm upper bound on QFI from the scaling realized by product-state initial conditions in the DTC regime, then numerically computing the QFI under the driven nonlinear Floquet Hamiltonian to observe quadratic growth in cycle number and an approximately linear rise in system-size exponent with nonlinearity strength. No equation reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked from prior author work to force the result. The separation of bounds and the numerical protocol are self-contained and externally falsifiable; any self-citations are incidental and non-load-bearing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum mechanics for driven systems and the prior existence of disorder-free DTC phases; nonlinearity is introduced as a tunable extension rather than a new postulated entity. No free parameters are fitted to data in the reported results; the nonlinearity exponent is varied parametrically.

free parameters (1)
  • nonlinearity exponent
    Treated as a variable parameter whose value controls the scaling improvement; not fitted to external data but explored numerically.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and Floquet theory govern the time evolution of the periodically driven system.
    Invoked to define the stroboscopic evolution and the quantum Fisher information under the nonlinear drive.
  • domain assumption A disorder-free discrete time crystal phase exists and supports long-lived subharmonic oscillations for product-state initial conditions.
    Required for the probe to operate in the regime where the reported scaling applies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5529 in / 1533 out tokens · 51189 ms · 2026-05-07T16:40:46.133730+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160401 (2012)

    2012

  2. [2]

    Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: A no-go theorem, Phys

    P. Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: A no-go theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 070402 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    Watanabe and M

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Absence of quantum time crys- tals, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 251603 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time-translation symmetry, Phys

    K. Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time-translation symmetry, Phys. Rev. A91, 033617 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    Khemani, A

    V . Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase structure of driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250401 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    D. V . Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 090402 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    N. Y . Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vishwanath, Discrete time crystals: Rigidity, criticality, and realizations, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030401 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Sacha and J

    K. Sacha and J. Zakrzewski, Time crystals: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 016401 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vish- wanath, N. Y . Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature543, 217 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    S. Choi, J. Choi, R. Landig, G. Kucsko, H. Zhou, J. Isoya, F. Jelezko, S. Onoda, H. Sumiya, V . Khemani, C. von Key- serlingk, N. Y . Yao, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many- body system, Nature543, 221 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    Rovny, R

    J. Rovny, R. L. Blum, and S. E. Barrett, Observation of discrete- time-crystal signatures in an ordered dipolar many-body sys- tem, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 180603 (2018)

    2018

  12. [12]

    Liu, L.-H

    B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Q.-F. Wang, Y . Ma, T.-Y . Han, J. Zhang, Z.-Y . Zhang, S.-Y . Shao, Q. Li, H.-C. Chen, B.-S. Shi, and D.- S. Ding, Higher-order and fractional discrete time crystals in floquet-driven rydberg atoms, Nat. Commun.15, 9730 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Liu, L.-H

    B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Y . Ma, Q.-F. Wang, T.-Y . Han, J. Zhang, Z.-Y . Zhang, S.-Y . Shao, Q. Li, H.-C. Chen, G.-C. Guo, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, Bifurcation of time crystals in driven and dissipative rydberg atomic gas, Nat. Commun.16, 1419 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Liu, J.-R

    B. Liu, J.-R. Chen, Y . Ma, Q.-F. Wang, T.-Y . Han, H. Tian, Y .-H. Qian, G.-C. Guo, L.-H. Zhang, B.-B. Wei, A. Bayat, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, Enhanced multi-parameter metrology in dissipative rydberg atom time crystals (2026), arXiv:2601.10347

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D.-Y . Zhu, Z.-Y . Zhang, Q.-F. Wang, Y . Ma, T.-Y . Han, C. Yu, Q.-Q. Fang, S.-Y . Shao, Q. Li, Y .-J. Wang, J. Zhang, H.-C. Chen, X. Liu, J.-D. Nan, Y .-M. Yin, L.-H. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, B. Liu, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, Observation of discrete time quasicrystal in rydberg atomic gases (2025), arXiv:2509.21248

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Alet and N

    F. Alet and N. Laflorencie, Many-body localization: An intro- duction and selected topics, Comptes Rendus Physique19, 498 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    Schulz, C

    M. Schulz, C. Hooley, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Stark many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 040606 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Morong, F

    W. Morong, F. Liu, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, L. Feng, A. Kypri- anidis, G. Pagano, T. You, A. V . Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Observation of Stark many-body localization without disorder, Nature599, 393 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Yousefjani and A

    R. Yousefjani and A. Bayat, Mobility edge in long-range inter- acting many-body localized systems, Phys. Rev. B107, 045108 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Yousefjani, S

    R. Yousefjani, S. Bose, and A. Bayat, Floquet-induced local- ization in long-range many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013094 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Kshetrimayum, J

    A. Kshetrimayum, J. Eisert, and D. Kennes, Stark time crys- tals: Symmetry breaking in space and time, Phys. Rev. B102, 195116 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Liu, S.-X

    S. Liu, S.-X. Zhang, C.-Y . Hsieh, S. Zhang, and H. Yao, Dis- crete time crystal enabled by stark many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 120403 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Sajid, R

    M. Sajid, R. Yousefjani, and A. Bayat, Thermal avalanches in isolated many-body localized systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 155140 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Raghunandan, J

    M. Raghunandan, J. Wrachtrup, and H. Weimer, High-density quantum sensing with dissipative first order transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 150501 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    T. L. Heugel, M. Biondi, O. Zilberberg, and R. Chitra, Quantum transducer using a parametric driven-dissipative phase transi- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 173601 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    Yang and Z

    L.-P. Yang and Z. Jacob, Engineering first-order quantum phase transitions for weak signal detection, J. Appl. Phys.126, 174502 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Zanardi, M

    P. Zanardi, M. G. Paris, and L. C. Venuti, Quantum criticality as a resource for quantum estimation, Phys. Rev. A78, 042105 (2008)

    2008

  28. [28]

    Invernizzi, M

    C. Invernizzi, M. Korbman, L. C. Venuti, and M. G. Paris, Op- timal quantum estimation in spin systems at criticality, Phys. Rev. A78, 042106 (2008)

    2008

  29. [29]

    Y . Chu, S. Zhang, B. Yu, and J. Cai, Dynamic framework for criticality-enhanced quantum sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 010502 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    Montenegro, U

    V . Montenegro, U. Mishra, and A. Bayat, Global sensing and its impact for quantum many-body probes with criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 200501 (2021). 8

    2021

  31. [31]

    Fern ´andez-Lorenzo and D

    S. Fern ´andez-Lorenzo and D. Porras, Quantum sensing close to a dissipative phase transition: Symmetry breaking and critical- ity as metrological resources, Phys. Rev. A96, 013817 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    Ilias, D

    T. Ilias, D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Criticality- enhanced quantum sensing via continuous measurement, PRX Quantum3, 010354 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Sarkar, C

    S. Sarkar, C. Mukhopadhyay, A. Alase, and A. Bayat, Free- fermionic topological quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 090503 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-Hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 180403 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Koch and J

    F. Koch and J. C. Budich, Quantum non-Hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013113 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Mishra and A

    U. Mishra and A. Bayat, Driving enhanced quantum sensing in partially accessible many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 080504 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Mishra and A

    U. Mishra and A. Bayat, Integrable quantum many-body sen- sors for AC field sensing, Sci. Rep.12, 14760 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    X. He, R. Yousefjani, and A. Bayat, Stark localization as a re- source for weak-field sensing with super-Heisenberg precision, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 010801 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Yousefjani, X

    R. Yousefjani, X. He, and A. Bayat, Long-range interact- ing Stark many-body probes with super-Heisenberg precision, Chin. Phys. B32, 100313 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    Yousefjani, X

    R. Yousefjani, X. He, A. Carollo, and A. Bayat, Nonlinearity- enhanced quantum sensing in stark probes, Phys. Rev. Applied 23, 014019 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Exponentially-enhanced Weak-field Sensing with Quantum Stark Localization

    R. Yousefjani and S. Al-Kuwari, Exponentially-enhanced weak-field sensing with quantum stark localization (2026), arXiv:2604.17262 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    J.-Y . Gyhm, H. Kwon, and M.-J. Hwang, Fundamental scaling limit in critical quantum metrology (2025), arXiv:2506.19003 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Sarkar, A

    S. Sarkar, A. Bayat, S. Bose, and R. Ghosh, Exponentially- enhanced quantum sensing with many-body phase transitions, Nat. Commun.16, 5159 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    R. Liu, Y . Chen, M. Jiang, X. Yang, Z. Wu, Y . Huan, J. Fei, X. Gong, Z. Su, T. Lan, J. Lu, H. Yuan, and X. Wang, Experi- mental critical quantum metrology with the heisenberg scaling, npj Quantum Inf.7, 170 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Ding, Z.-K

    D.-S. Ding, Z.-K. Liu, B.-S. Shi, G.-C. Guo, K. Mølmer, and C. S. Adams, Enhanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body rydberg atomic system, Nat. Phys.18, 1447 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    Y . Yu, R. Liu, G. Xue, C. Yang, C. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Cui, X. Yang, J. Li, J. Han, and H. Yu, Experimental realiza- tion of criticality-enhanced global quantum sensing via non- equilibrium dynamics (2025), arXiv:2501.04955 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    H. Li, Y . Yang, Y .-H. Shi, Z.-A. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Li, Y . Zhang, K. Zhao, Y .-S. Xu, C.-L. Deng, L. Yu, W.-G. Ma, T.-M. Li, J.-C. Zhang, C.-P. Fang, J.-C. Song, H.-T. Liu, S.-Y . Zhou, Z.- H. Liu, B.-J. Chen, G.-H. Liang, X. Song, Z. Xiang, K. Xu, K. Huang, A. Bayat, and H. Fan, Non-equilibrium criticality- enhanced quantum sensing with superconducting...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    L. Xiao, S. Sarkar, K. Wang, A. Bayat, and P. Xue, Observation of criticality-enhanced quantum sensing in nonunitary quantum walks, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 060802 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    L. Xiao, Y . Chu, Q. Lin, H. Lin, W. Yi, J. Cai, and P. Xue, Non- hermitian sensing in the absence of exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 180801 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    X. Tong, X. Qiu, X. Zhan, Q. Lin, K. Wang, F. Nori, and P. Xue, Topological sensing in the dynamics of quantum walks with defects, Phys. Rev. B112, L241116 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    Beaulieu, F

    G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, M. Scigliuzzo, S. Felicetti, R. Di Candia, and P. Scarlino, Criticality-enhanced quantum sensing with a parametric superconducting resonator, PRX Quantum6, 020301 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Montenegro, C

    V . Montenegro, C. Mukhopadhyay, R. Yousefjani, S. Sarkar, U. Mishra, M. G. A. Paris, and A. Bayat, Review: Quantum metrology and sensing with many-body systems, Physics Re- ports1134, 1 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    C. Lyu, S. Choudhury, C. Lv, Y . Yan, and Q. Zhou, Eternal discrete time crystal beating the heisenberg limit, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033070 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    Iemini, R

    F. Iemini, R. Fazio, and A. Sanpera, Floquet time crystals as quantum sensors of AC fields, Phys. Rev. A109, L050203 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    Yousefjani, K

    R. Yousefjani, K. Sacha, and A. Bayat, Discrete time crystal phase as a resource for quantum-enhanced sensing, Phys. Rev. B111, 125159 (2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    Yousefjani, S

    R. Yousefjani, S. Al-Kuwari, and A. Bayat, Discrete time crys- tal for periodic-field sensing with quantum-enhanced precision, Phys. Rev. Applied24, 054047 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Tsypilnikov, M

    A. Tsypilnikov, M. Fibger, and F. Iemini, Exact analysis of AC sensors based on floquet time crystals, Phys. Rev. A113, 022620 (2026)

    2026

  58. [58]

    R. K. Shukla, L. Chotorlishvili, S. K. Mishra, and F. Iemini, Prethermal floquet time crystals in chiral multiferroic chains and applications as quantum sensors of AC fields, Phys. Rev. B111, 024315 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Montenegro, P

    V . Montenegro, P. Cejnar, K. Gietka, and A. Carollo, Quantum metrology with boundary time crystals, Commun. Phys.6, 304 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    Cabot, A

    A. Cabot, A. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Continuous sensing and parameter estimation with the boundary time crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 050801 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Viotti, M

    L. Viotti, M. Huber, R. Fazio, and G. Manzano, Quantum time crystal clock and its performance, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 110401 (2026)

    2026

  62. [62]

    Gribben, A

    D. Gribben, A. Sanpera, R. Fazio, J. Marino, and F. Iemini, Boundary time crystals as ac sensors: Enhancements and con- straints, SciPost Physics18, 100 (2025)

    2025

  63. [63]

    Sierant, G

    P. Sierant, G. Chiriac `o, F. M. Surace, S. Sharma, X. Turkeshi, M. Dalmonte, R. Fazio, and G. Pagano, Dissipative floquet dy- namics: From steady state to measurement induced criticality in trapped-ion chains, Quantum6, 638 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    L. J. I. Moon, P. M. Schindler, R. J. Smith, E. Druga, Z.-R. Zhang, M. Bukov, and A. Ajoy, Sensing with discrete time crys- tals, Nat. Phys.22, 367 (2026)

    2026

  65. [65]

    R. A. Fisher, On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A222, 309 (1922)

    1922

  66. [66]

    Cram ´er,Mathematical Methods of Statistics(Princeton Uni- versity Press, 1999)

    H. Cram ´er,Mathematical Methods of Statistics(Princeton Uni- versity Press, 1999)

    1999

  67. [67]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3439 (1994)

    1994

  68. [68]

    Boixo, S

    S. Boixo, S. T. Flammia, C. M. Caves, and J. M. Geremia, Gen- eralized limits for single-parameter quantum estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 090401 (2007)

    2007

  69. [69]

    Abiuso, P

    P. Abiuso, P. Sekatski, J. Calsamiglia, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Fundamental limits of metrology at thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 010801 (2025)

    2025

  70. [70]

    R. Puig, P. Sekatski, P. A. Erdman, P. Abiuso, J. Calsamiglia, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, From dynamical to steady-state many- body metrology: Precision limits and their attainability with two-body interactions, PRX Quantum6, 030309 (2025)

    2025

  71. [71]

    Lenar ˇciˇc, O

    Z. Lenar ˇciˇc, O. Alberton, A. Rosch, and E. Altman, Critical behavior near the many-body localization transition in driven 9 open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 116601 (2020)

    2020

  72. [72]

    D’Alessio and M

    L. D’Alessio and M. Rigol, Long-time behavior of isolated pe- riodically driven interacting lattice systems, Phys. Rev. X4, 041048 (2014)

    2014

  73. [73]

    Lazarides, A

    A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Equilibrium states of generic quantum systems subject to periodic driving, Phys. Rev. E90, 012110 (2014)

    2014

  74. [74]

    Hauschild and F

    J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, Efficient numerical simulations with tensor networks: Tensor network python (TeNPy), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 5 (2018)

    2018

  75. [75]

    X. Mi, M. Ippoliti, and e. a. Quintana, Time-crystalline eigen- state order on a quantum processor, Nature601, 531 (2022)

    2022