pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25302 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Moving Cooling Source Induced Phase Separation in Binary Liquids: an interplay of competing velocities

Lakshmipriya K , Harssh Karn , Sutapa Roy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords phase separationbinary mixturemoving cooling sourcecompeting velocitiespattern formationCahn-Hilliard modeltemperature couplingdemixing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Phase separation patterns in binary liquids depend on both the ratio and absolute values of a moving cooling source's speed and its cooling front speed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines phase separation in a binary mixture exposed to a moving cooling source that sends cold fronts outward. This creates two velocities: vs for the source's motion and v for how fast the cooling fronts spread. How long any region stays below the demixing temperature hinges on their competition, which sets the course of separation. Numerical work with a temperature-coupled model shows that patterns and their growth rates change with both the ratio vs/v and the actual size of v. The map of temperatures above versus below the critical point ends up shaping the structures that appear.

Core claim

The evolving patterns and kinetics strongly depend on both the ratio and absolute magnitudes of the two competing velocities vs and v. Same value of vs/v yields distinctly different patterns for different v. The temperature profile delineating spatial regions with local temperatures above and below the demixing temperature controls the shape of the patterns formed. A modified Cahn-Hilliard-Cook framework with explicit coupling between the time-dependent temperature and concentration fields is used to capture this.

What carries the argument

Modified Cahn-Hilliard-Cook model with explicit coupling between time-dependent temperature and concentration fields, where competition between source translation velocity vs and cooling front propagation velocity v sets how long regions experience temperatures below the demixing point.

If this is right

  • Same ratio vs/v produces distinctly different patterns when the absolute value of v changes.
  • The spatial temperature profile above and below the demixing temperature determines the final pattern shapes.
  • Kinetics of separation are governed by how long each region spends below the demixing temperature.
  • The broad range of possible velocity pairs allows tuning to produce specific desired structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This velocity-tuning approach might extend to controlling microstructures during industrial cooling of mixtures or in additive manufacturing with moving heat sources.
  • Comparable effects could appear in other moving-heat systems such as crystal growth or fluid flows with localized cooling.
  • Independent experimental control of vs and v would directly test whether absolute magnitudes matter beyond the ratio.

Load-bearing premise

The modified Cahn-Hilliard-Cook model with explicit temperature-concentration coupling, as implemented numerically, faithfully captures the real dynamics of a moving cooling source.

What would settle it

Laboratory observation of phase separation patterns in a binary liquid mixture using a controlled moving cooling source, tested at fixed vs/v but different absolute v values, to check whether patterns remain distinct.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25302 by Harssh Karn, Lakshmipriya K, Sutapa Roy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A moving cooling source induced phase separation in a binary mixture with an off-critical composition, view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Coarsening patterns for view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Phase separation patterns for view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Plot of the spatial region view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Log–log plot of the domain width view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Domain morphology for (a) view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Scaled two-point equal time correlation function view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Phase diagram of the system in the view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Domain morphology for view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a) Time-dependence of the number of stripes within a view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate phase separation dynamics in a binary mixture subjected to a moving cooling source from which cold temperature fronts propagate radially outward into the mixture. The motion of the source introduces two distinct velocity scales: $v_s$ associated with the translation of the source, and $v$ related to the propagation of the cooling thermal fronts. Competition between the two velocities determines how long a region of the fluid experiences a temperature change, which directly controls phase separation. A modified Cahn Hilliard Cook framework is employed, incorporating explicit coupling between the time-dependent temperature and concentration fields. Our numerical simulation results reveal that the evolving patterns and kinetics strongly depend on both the ratio and absolute magnitudes of these two competing velocities. Same value of $v_s/v$ yields distinctly different patterns for different $v$. The temperature profile delineating spatial regions with local temperatures above and below the demixing temperature controls the shape of the patterns formed. The rich parameter space enables one to engineer desired pattern structures by tuning the two velocities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically simulates phase separation in a binary liquid mixture driven by a moving cooling source using a modified Cahn-Hilliard-Cook model with explicit temperature-concentration coupling. It reports that pattern morphology and kinetics depend on both the velocity ratio vs/v and the absolute magnitudes of vs (source translation) and v (cooling-front propagation), with the spatial temperature profile (regions above/below the demixing temperature) controlling the resulting structures; the same ratio produces distinct outcomes at different absolute speeds.

Significance. If the reported velocity dependence is robust, the work identifies a controllable mechanism for engineering phase-separation patterns via competing velocities, extending non-equilibrium thermodynamics of binary mixtures and offering a simulation-based route to microstructure design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results] Results section (and abstract): the central claim that identical vs/v ratios produce distinctly different patterns at different absolute v rests entirely on the numerical outputs, yet the manuscript provides no grid-convergence tests, time-step independence checks, or error bars on the reported morphologies and kinetic measures; without these, it is unclear whether the observed distinctions survive refinement of the discretization.
  2. [Model and Methods] Model implementation: the modified Cahn-Hilliard-Cook equations with imposed moving temperature field are solved numerically, but the paper does not report validation against known limiting cases (e.g., stationary source or equilibrium phase separation) or sensitivity to the mobility and noise amplitude parameters that set the intrinsic time scales competing with v and vs.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Discussion] The abstract states that 'the temperature profile delineating spatial regions... controls the shape,' but the manuscript would benefit from a quantitative metric (e.g., correlation between local temperature and local order-parameter variance) rather than qualitative description.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and legends should explicitly state the values of vs, v, and the ratio used in each panel, together with the simulation domain size and total integration time.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where additional documentation will strengthen the presentation. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested material in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section (and abstract): the central claim that identical vs/v ratios produce distinctly different patterns at different absolute v rests entirely on the numerical outputs, yet the manuscript provides no grid-convergence tests, time-step independence checks, or error bars on the reported morphologies and kinetic measures; without these, it is unclear whether the observed distinctions survive refinement of the discretization.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical convergence tests are necessary to support the robustness of the reported velocity-dependent patterns. Although the chosen discretization parameters follow conventions established in the Cahn-Hilliard literature, the original submission did not include dedicated convergence or time-step studies. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection presenting results from grid-refinement runs (halving and doubling the spatial step size) and time-step independence checks. We will also include statistical error bars obtained from an ensemble of independent realizations that differ only in the random seed of the noise term, thereby quantifying the variability in both morphological descriptors and kinetic measures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model and Methods] Model implementation: the modified Cahn-Hilliard-Cook equations with imposed moving temperature field are solved numerically, but the paper does not report validation against known limiting cases (e.g., stationary source or equilibrium phase separation) or sensitivity to the mobility and noise amplitude parameters that set the intrinsic time scales competing with v and vs.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript omitted these standard validation steps. The revised Methods section will contain two new paragraphs: one demonstrating that the code recovers the expected isotropic spinodal decomposition when the source is held stationary (vs = 0) and the expected absence of phase separation when the entire domain remains above the demixing temperature; the second will report a parameter-sensitivity study in which the mobility coefficient and noise amplitude are varied over physically plausible ranges while keeping the velocity scales fixed. These tests will confirm that the qualitative dependence on the ratio vs/v and on the absolute magnitudes of vs and v is insensitive to modest changes in the intrinsic time scales. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from direct numerical integration of a modified Cahn-Hilliard-Cook system with an externally imposed moving cooling source. The stated dependence of patterns and kinetics on the ratio vs/v and on the absolute values of vs and v follows immediately from the structure of the coupled PDEs (intrinsic mobility and interfacial time scales versus the imposed velocity scales) without any parameter fitting to the target morphologies, without self-definitional closure, and without load-bearing self-citations. The temperature-profile control of morphology is an observed consequence of the simulation, not an input smuggled in by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the assumption that the chosen continuum model and its numerical discretization capture the essential physics; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The modified Cahn-Hilliard-Cook equations with explicit time-dependent temperature coupling accurately describe the phase separation dynamics under a moving cooling source.
    Invoked as the framework for all numerical simulations in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1219 out tokens · 65100 ms · 2026-05-07T14:29:50.704080+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In our work, there is a temperature field which depends on both space and time

    which obeys the relation⟨η(r,t)η(r ′,t ′)⟩=−2ν(r)∇ 2δ(r− r′)δ(t−t ′),ν(r)characterizing the noise strength. In our work, there is a temperature field which depends on both space and time. In order to incorporate this, we make the parameterain Eq. (7) space dependent:a=a 0(T(r,t)−T c)/Tc,a 0 being a positive constant. By construction,T(r,t)<T c favors phas...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Puri and V

    S. Puri and V . Wadhawan, eds.,Kinetics of Phase Transitions (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    A. J. Bray, Advances in Physics51, 481 (2002)

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Onuki,Phase Transition Dynamics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    A. Onuki,Phase Transition Dynamics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Duhr and D

    S. Duhr and D. Braun, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 168301 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Jiménez Amaya and E

    A. Jiménez Amaya and E. H. Hill, Langmuir41, 12835 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    H. Zhou, Z. Jin, Y . Xu, Y . Lu, Z. Xia, F. Yang, Q. Wu, Y . Gao, J. Yin, J. Zhang, C. Ni, B. Zhang, Y . He, H. Yang, and K. Xu, National Science Review12, nwaf136 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Ktafi, M

    I. Ktafi, M. Lancry, M. Dussauze, B. Poumellec, Y . Shimot- suma, D. R. Neuville, M. Vallet, L. Cornet, and M. Cavillon, Optical Materials150, 115294 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    K. Jin, W. Yu, Y . Liu, J. Li, G. Du, J. Chen, L. Liu, and X. Lv, Trends in biotechnology43, 1403–1424 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    V oit, A

    A. V oit, A. Krekhov, W. Enge, L. Kramer, and W. Köhler, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 214501 (2005)

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    Hong and P

    S. Hong and P. K. Chan, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering18, 025013 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Matsui, Y

    Y . Matsui, Y . Maeda, M. Kawase, T. Suzuki, and S. Tsushima, Sustainable Energy Fuels7, 3832 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Muglia and E

    J. Muglia and E. V . Albano, The European Physical Journal B 85(2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Wirnsberger, D

    P. Wirnsberger, D. Frenkel, and C. Dellago, The Journal of Chemical Physics143, 124104 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    N. E. R. Zimmermann, G. Guevara-Carrion, J. Vrabec, and N. Hansen, Advanced Theory and Simulations5, 2200311 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Liang, K

    Z. Liang, K. Sasikumar, and P. Keblinski, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 225701 (2013)

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    P. K. Jaiswal, S. Puri, and K. Binder, Europhysics Letters103, 66003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    K.-W. D. Lee, P. K. Chan, and X. Feng, Macromolecular The- ory and Simulations11, 996 (2002)

    work page 2002

  19. [19]

    Gonnella, A

    G. Gonnella, A. Lamura, and A. Piscitelli, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical41, 105001 (2008)

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Roy and S

    S. Roy and S. K. Das, The European Physical Journal E38, 132 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    S. Roy, A. Bera, S. Majumder, and S. K. Das, Soft Matter15, 4743 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    S. K. Das, S. Roy, S. Majumder, and S. Ahmad, Europhysics Letters97, 66006 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Oprisan, Y

    A. Oprisan, Y . Garrabos, C. Lecoutre, and D. Beysens, Molecules22(2017), 10.3390/molecules22060947

    work page doi:10.3390/molecules22060947 2017

  24. [24]

    Gonnella and A

    G. Gonnella and A. Lamura, Journal of Physics A: Mathemati- cal and Theoretical53, 305002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Biswas, G

    T. Biswas, G. Kahl, and G. P. Shrivastav, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics160, 214901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    W. Li, J. Hu, and R. Liu, Processes13(2025), 10.3390/pr13093014

    work page doi:10.3390/pr13093014 2025

  27. [27]

    G. Sahu, C. Chakraborty, S. Roy, and S. Banerjee, Physica Scripta100, 055931 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    I. M. Lifshitz and V . V . Slyozov, Journal of Physics and Chem- istry of Solids19, 35 (1961). 9

    work page 1961

  29. [29]

    Binder, inPhase Transformations of Materials, Materi- als Science and Technology, V ol

    K. Binder, inPhase Transformations of Materials, Materi- als Science and Technology, V ol. 5, edited by R. W. Cahn, P. Haasen, and E. J. Kramer (VCH, Weinheim, 1991) pp. 405– 471

    work page 1991

  30. [30]

    Laradji, S

    M. Laradji, S. Toxvaerd, and O. G. Mouritsen, Physical Review Letters77, 2253 (1996)

    work page 1996

  31. [31]

    Roy and S

    S. Roy and S. K. Das, Journal of Chemical Physics139, 044911 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    A. K. Singh and V . Banerjee, Soft Matter19, 2370 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Roy and S

    S. Roy and S. K. Das, Soft Matter9, 4178 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Roy and S

    S. Roy and S. K. Das, Physical Review E85, 050602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Binder, Physical Review B15, 4425 (1977)

    K. Binder, Physical Review B15, 4425 (1977)

    work page 1977

  36. [36]

    Tanaka, Journal of Chemical Physics107, 3734 (1997)

    H. Tanaka, Journal of Chemical Physics107, 3734 (1997)

    work page 1997

  37. [37]

    Krekhov, Phys

    A. Krekhov, Phys. Rev. E79, 035302 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Kurita, Scientific Reports7, 6912 (2017)

    R. Kurita, Scientific Reports7, 6912 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Roy and A

    S. Roy and A. Maciołek, Soft Matter14, 9326 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Furukawa, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applica- tions180, 128 (1992)

    H. Furukawa, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applica- tions180, 128 (1992)

    work page 1992

  41. [41]

    E. M. Foard and A. J. Wagner, Phys. Rev. E79, 056710 (2009)

    work page 2009

  42. [42]

    Gonnella, A

    G. Gonnella, A. Lamura, A. Piscitelli, and A. Tiribocchi, Phys. Rev. E82, 046302 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    E. M. Foard and A. J. Wagner, Phys. Rev. E85, 011501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    Weith, A

    V . Weith, A. Krekhov, and W. Zimmermann, The European Physical Journal B67, 1434 (2009)

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    Hantz and I

    P. Hantz and I. Biró, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 088305 (2006)

    work page 2006

  46. [46]

    Fisher,Critical phenomena / edited by M

    M. Fisher,Critical phenomena / edited by M. S. Green(Aca- demic Press, London, 1971)

    work page 1971

  47. [47]

    Stanley,Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenom- ena(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971)

    H. Stanley,Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenom- ena(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971)

    work page 1971

  48. [48]

    Puri and V

    S. Puri and V . W. (eds.),Kinetics of Phase transitions(CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009)

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    Plischke and B

    M. Plischke and B. Bergersen,Equilibrium Statictical Mechan- ics(World Scientific, Singapore, 2006)

    work page 2006

  50. [50]

    S. K. Das, S. Puri, J. Horbach, and K. Binder, Physical Review Letters96, 016107 (2006)

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    Höfling and S

    F. Höfling and S. Dietrich, The Journal of Chemical Physics 160, 104107 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Fayaz-Torshizi, W

    M. Fayaz-Torshizi, W. Xu, J. R. Vella, B. D. Marshall, P. I. Ravikovitch, and E. A. Müller, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry B126, 1085 (2022), pMID: 35104134

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    J. R. Gomez-Solano, A. Blokhuis, and C. Bechinger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 138301 (2016)

    work page 2016