pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25401 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: unknown

Raman Characterization of Two-Dimensional Quasiperiodic Antiferromagnets on Various Lattices: Spin-Orbit Mechanism

Takashi Inoue , Shoji Yamamoto
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords raman scatteringquasiperiodic antiferromagnetsspin-orbit interactionxxz modelfirst-order ramanperpendicular spacemagnonsbipartite lattices
0
0 comments X

The pith

First-order Raman spectra in quasiperiodic antiferromagnets split into multiple peaks as anisotropy changes from Ising to Heisenberg, unlike the single peaks on periodic lattices.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares first-order Raman scattering in two-dimensional spin-half antiferromagnets on quasiperiodic versus periodic lattices using a nearest-neighbor XXZ model with spin-orbit induced light coupling. It finds that peaks split in ways unique to the quasiperiodic arrangement, depending on the variety of isocoordinated sites and their positions. This splitting occurs as the system moves away from the Ising limit toward isotropic Heisenberg interactions, while periodic lattices show no splitting. The perpendicular-space view of the spectrum acts as a distinct fingerprint for each type of quasiperiodic tiling. This matters because it provides an optical signature to identify and differentiate complex aperiodic magnetic structures.

Core claim

The first-order spectra consist only of rotation-invariant and mirror-symmetric magnons. With the exchange anisotropy moving away from the Ising limit toward the Heisenberg isotropic point, every initial delta-function peak bifurcates or divides into more in each individual manner on quasiperiodic lattices, while it remains singly peaked all the way on periodic lattices. Such splittings depend on how many types of isocoordinated sites for each coordination number and relative positions between those of the same type. A perpendicular-space representation of the first-order Raman spectrum serves as a fingerprint of each quasiperiodic tiling.

What carries the argument

The spin-orbit mechanism for indirect electric-dipole coupling that enables first-order single-magnon Raman scattering, combined with the XXZ anisotropy on bipartite quasiperiodic lattices.

Load-bearing premise

The nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic XXZ Hamiltonian plus indirect electric-dipole coupling via spin-orbit interaction fully captures the first-order Raman process, with no significant contributions from longer-range interactions, disorder, or higher-order scattering channels.

What would settle it

Measuring the Raman spectrum of a quasiperiodic antiferromagnet and finding that the peaks do not split or split in the same way as on a periodic lattice when the anisotropy is varied would contradict the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25401 by Shoji Yamamoto, Takashi Inoue.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) C8v-symmetric finite Ammann-Beenker lattice with L = 481 sites. (b) The Ammann-Beenker lattice is generated from a rhombus with an acute angle of π/4 and a square. The canonical basis vectors of a four￾dimensional hypercubic lattice are projected onto four vectors, denoted e1, e2, e3, and e4, which serve as the primitive translation vectors for the two-dimensional Ammann-Beenker lattice. (c) Six types … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) C3v-symmetric finite Socolar lattice with L = 784 sites. (b) The Socolar lattice is generated from a rhombus with an acute angle of π/6, a reg￾ular hexagon, and a square. The canonical basis vectors of a six-dimensional hypercubic lattice are projected onto six vectors, denoted e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, and e6. Two vectors chosen from {e1, e3, e5} and two from {e2, e4, e6} form the primitive translation vect… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Contour plots of the spin-orbit mechanism magnetic Raman spectra I ⊥(ω) (18) as a function of the exchange anisotropy ∆ for bipartite quasiperi￾odic lattices with open boundaries and for periodic lattices. Penrose lattice of L = 10351 (a), Ammann-Beenker lattice of L = 10457 (b), Socolar lattice of L = 11566 (c), square lattice (d), honeycomb lattice (e), and Lieb lattice (f). Note that z = 2 vertices are … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Eigenvalues ε σ kσ at ∆ = 0.5 of the C5v (m = 5) Penrose cluster of L = 76 (a1), the C8v (m = 8) Ammann-Beenker cluster of L = 89 (b1), and the C3v (m = 3) Socolar cluster of L = 91 (c1), resolved by the rota￾tional quantum number Qµ = 2πµ/m (µ = 1, · · · , m). Magenta levels indi￾cate Raman-active states that are rotation-invariant (Qµ=m = 2π) and mirror￾symmetric (P = 2π). Spin-orbit mechanism magnetic R… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The same as view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The same as view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spin-orbit-mechanism magnetic Raman spectra I ⊥(ω) (18) for the Penrose lattice of L = 10351 at ∆ = 0.4, shown for the frequency ranges J ≤ ~ω ≤ 2J (a1), 2J ≤ ~ω ≤ 3J (a2), and 3J ≤ ~ω ≤ 4J (a3). Contour plots of the site-resolved Raman spectra I ⊥(ω)|l (21) multiplied by the number of sites in the perpendicular space at the two split peaks indicated by arrows in (a2), associated with sites of coordination… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Spin-orbit-mechanism magnetic Raman spectra I ⊥(ω) (18) for the Ammann-Beenker lattice of L = 10457 at ∆ = 0.4, shown for the frequency ranges J ≤ ~ω ≤ 2J (a1), 2J ≤ ~ω ≤ 3J (a2), and 3J ≤ ~ω ≤ 4J (a3). Contour plots of site-resolved Raman spectra I ⊥(ω)|l (21) multiplied by the number of sites in the perpendicular space at the characteristic peaks, indicated by arrows in (a1) and (a2), associated with th… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spin-orbit-mechanism magnetic Raman spectra I ⊥(ω) (18) for the Socolar lattice of L = 11566 at ∆ = 0.5, shown for the frequency ranges J ≤ ~ω ≤ 2J (a1) and 2J ≤ ~ω ≤ 3J (a2). Contour plots of the site-resolved Raman spectra I ⊥(ω)|l (21) multiplied by the number of sites in the perpendicular space at the two peaks, indicated by arrows in (a2), both associated with coordination number z = 6 (b1, b2). Real… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Spin-orbit mechanism magnetic Raman spectra I ⊥(ω) (18) at ∆ = 0.999 for the Penrose lattices of L = 5881 and L = 10351 (a1), for the Ammann-Beenker lattices of L = 6673 and L = 10457 (b1), and for the Socolar lattices of L = 5056 and L = 11566 (c1). Contour plots of site￾resolved Raman spectra I ⊥(ω)|l (21) multiplied by the number of sites at the peak energy: L = 5881 (a2) and L = 10351 (a3) for the Pen… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study first-order (single-magnon) inelastic light scatterings in spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ two-dimensional quasiperiodic antiferromagnets in comparison with those emergent on periodic lattices. Unlike second-order (two-magnon) Raman scatterings based on an exchange interaction between neighboring spins, the present observations involve an indirect electric-dipole coupling which proceeds through a spin-orbit interaction. We discuss the nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic XXZ Hamiltonian on various quasiperiodic and periodic bipartite lattices. The first-order spectra, of our present interest, consist only of rotation-invariant and mirror-symmetric magnons, while the second-order ones cannot select any particular magnon. With the exchange anisotropy moving away from the Ising limit toward the Heisenberg isotropic point, every initial delta-function peak bifurcates or divides into more in each individual manner on quasiperiodic lattices, while it remains singly peaked all the way on periodic lattices. Such splittings depend on how many types of isocoordinated sites for each coordination number and relative positions between those of the same type. A perpendicular-space representation of the first-order Raman spectrum serves as a fingerprint of each quasiperiodic tiling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines first-order Raman spectra from single-magnon excitations in spin-1/2 antiferromagnets on two-dimensional quasiperiodic lattices, modeled by the nearest-neighbor XXZ Hamiltonian with an indirect electric-dipole coupling mediated by spin-orbit interaction. It contrasts this with periodic lattices and reports that, as the exchange anisotropy varies from the Ising limit toward the Heisenberg point, delta-function peaks split on quasiperiodic tilings in a manner determined by the multiplicity and relative positions of isocoordinated sites, while remaining unsplit on periodic lattices. A perpendicular-space representation of the spectrum is proposed as a fingerprint for each quasiperiodic tiling. The spectra are restricted to rotation-invariant and mirror-symmetric magnons.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies a concrete spectroscopic signature for distinguishing quasiperiodic from periodic antiferromagnetic order through anisotropy-dependent peak splittings, which could assist experimental characterization of quasicrystalline magnets. The direct computational protocol on the explicit model, the symmetry selection rules, and the parameter-free nature of the splitting mechanism (no fitted parameters) constitute clear strengths that enhance the paper's utility for the field.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction refer to 'various quasiperiodic and periodic bipartite lattices' without immediately enumerating the specific tilings examined; listing them (e.g., Penrose, Ammann-Beenker) with coordination-number statistics would improve readability.
  2. [Raman operator construction] The construction of the Raman operator via spin-orbit coupling is described, but the explicit matrix elements or selection rules for the rotation-invariant and mirror-symmetric magnons should be shown in an equation or table for one representative lattice to make the bifurcation mechanism fully transparent.
  3. [Computational protocol] Numerical details such as system sizes used for diagonalization, convergence checks with respect to cluster size, and any error estimates on peak positions or intensities are not mentioned in the provided summary; adding a short methods paragraph or appendix would strengthen reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report, so we have no points to address individually at this stage. We will review the manuscript for any minor improvements prior to resubmission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper constructs the first-order Raman operator from the spin-orbit-mediated electric-dipole mechanism and computes single-magnon spectra by direct diagonalization (or equivalent) of the nearest-neighbor XXZ Hamiltonian on explicitly given quasiperiodic and periodic lattices. Peak splittings are shown to follow from the geometric multiplicity of isocoordinated sites, which is an input property of the tilings rather than a derived or fitted quantity. No parameters are adjusted to match data inside the paper, no self-citations supply the central uniqueness or ansatz, and the perpendicular-space fingerprint is a direct re-expression of the computed spectrum. The model scope is stated explicitly rather than smuggled in.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard XXZ spin model and the spin-orbit-mediated Raman mechanism being sufficient; both are domain assumptions rather than derived results.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic XXZ Hamiltonian describes the quasiperiodic antiferromagnets
    Explicitly stated as the Hamiltonian under study in the abstract.
  • domain assumption First-order Raman scattering proceeds via indirect electric-dipole coupling through spin-orbit interaction
    Basis for selecting only rotation-invariant and mirror-symmetric magnons.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1451 out tokens · 80057 ms · 2026-05-07T15:01:22.407443+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Raman Characterization of Two-Dimensional Quasiperiodic Antiferromagnets on Various Lattices: Spin-Orbit Mechanism

    Introduction Quasicrystals are exotic materials that lack translationa l symmetry but exhibit long-range order. 1, 2) Since their first discovery in aluminum-manganese alloys, 3) a wide variety of quasicrystalline materials have been synthesized. 4–11) While early explorations were limited to synthetic intermetalli c compounds,12) recent studies have repor...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    The colors of the domains correspond to the vertices shown in (c)

  3. [3]

    Each of these lattices is bipartite, as it is composed of even - edged prototiles

    Two-dimensional Quasiperiodic Lattice We investigate three two-dimensional quasiperiodic lat- tices: the Penrose, Ammann-Beenker, and Socolar lattices. Each of these lattices is bipartite, as it is composed of even - edged prototiles. No sublattice imbalance arises in the the r- modynamic limit. 37–39) For all three lattices, the spatial di- mension d is ...

  4. [4]

    The pentagonal projection windows are partitioned into compac t regions, each corresponding to one of the eight vertex types [Fig

    The vertex sites contained in Z = 0 and Z = 2/ √ 5 layers form the even sublattice, while those in Z = 1/ √ 5 and Z = 3/ √ 5 layers form the odd sublattice. The pentagonal projection windows are partitioned into compac t regions, each corresponding to one of the eight vertex types [Fig. 1(d)]. Their areas and structures can be categorized i nto two classe...

  5. [5]

    Model and Method We study the spin S = 1 2 nearest-neighbor antiferromag- netic XXZ model on the two-dimensional C5v Penrose, C8v Ammann-Beenker, and C3v Socolar tilings, each consisting of bipartite sublattices A with LA sites and B with LB sites (LA + LB ≡L), whose Hamiltonian reads H = J ∑ ⟨i, j⟩ { ∆ ( S x riS x r j + S y riS y r j ) + S z riS z r j } ...

  6. [6]

    ¾ k¾ /J ¹ 1 2 3 4 0 h! /J I(!) (arb. unit) 1 2 3 1.5 2.5 3.5 4 0.5 (a1) (a2) 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 1.5 2.5 3.5 4 0.5

    First-Order Spin-Orbit Raman Scattering Single-magnon-mediated Raman scattering is described as a third-order transition, involving a second-order electr ic- dipole coupling and a first-order SO interaction. 49) The matrix element for the Raman scattering process at the magnetic ion on site rl is given by Ml = 1∑ m, n=−1 ℏ √ ωinωsce2λ 2ε0V [ 1 (E0 −ℏωin)2 ...

  7. [7]

    The peaks associated with z = 6 sites exhibit a sub- tle splitting at ℏω = 2

    5. The peaks associated with z = 6 sites exhibit a sub- tle splitting at ℏω = 2. 90J and 2 . 92J [Fig. 11(a2)]. The perpendicular-space representations of the site-resolve d Ra- man spectra for each branch are shown in Figs. 11(b1) and 11(b2). The spectral-weight distribution indicates that t he z = 6 domain consists of two major regions, each associated ...

  8. [8]

    Summary and Discussion We have investigated spin-orbit-interaction-driven mag- netic Raman spectra of two-dimensional bipartite-lattice XXZ 7 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. FULL PAPERS 1 /g161 Y (b1) (b2) (b3) (b4) (b5) (b6) (c2) (c3) (c4) (c5) (c6) z /g32 3A z /g32 3B z /g32 5A z /g32 5B z /g32 6A z /g32 6B h! /J I┴(!) (arb. unit) 1 1.2 20 z /g32 4 z /g32 3(a1) 1.4 ...

  9. [9]

    999 for the Penrose lattices of L = 5881 and L = 10351 (a1), for the Ammann-Beenker lattices of L = 6673 and L = 10457 (b1), and for the Socolar lattices of L = 5056 and L = 11566 (c1). Contour plots of site- resolved Raman spectra I⊥(ω)|l (21) multiplied by the number of sites at the peak energy: L = 5881 (a2) and L = 10351 (a3) for the Penrose lattices,...

  10. [10]

    Levine and P

    D. Levine and P . J. Steinhardt, Quasicrystals: A New Class of Ordered Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2477 (1984)

    1984

  11. [11]

    Levine and P

    D. Levine and P . J. Steinhardt, Quasicrystals. I. Definiti on and structure, Phys. Rev. B 34, 596 (1986)

    1986

  12. [12]

    Shechtman, I

    D. Shechtman, I. Blech, D. Gratias, and J. W. Cahn, Metalli c Phase with Long-Range Orientational Order and No Translational S ymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951 (1984)

    1951

  13. [13]

    A. P . Tsai, A. Inoue, T. Masumoto, A Stable Quasicrystal in Al-Cu-Fe System. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26, L1505 (1987)

    1987

  14. [14]

    A. P . Tsai, A. Inoue, T. Masumoto, New Stable Icosahedral A l-Cu-Ru and Al-Cu-Os Alloys. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 27, L1587 (1988)

    1988

  15. [15]

    A. P . Tsai, J. Q. Guo, E. Abe, H. Takakura, and T. J. Sato, A stable binary quasicrystal, Nature 480, 537 (2000)

    2000

  16. [16]

    Takakura, C

    H. Takakura, C. P . G´ omez, A. Y amamoto, M. de Boissieu, and A. P . Tsai, Atomic structure of the binary icosahedral Yb-Cd quas icrystal, Nat. Mater. 6, 58 (2007)

    2007

  17. [17]

    Deguchi, S

    K. Deguchi, S. Matsukawa, N. K. Sato, T. Hattori, K. Ishida , H. Takakura, and T. Ishimasa, Quantum critical state in a magne tic qua- sicrystal, Nat. Mater. 11, 1013 (2012)

    2012

  18. [18]

    Kamiya, T

    K. Kamiya, T. Takeuchi, N. Kabeya, N. Wada, T. Ishimasa, A. Ochiai, K. Deguchi, K. Imura, and N. K. Sato, Discovery of supercondu ctivity in quasicrystal, Nat. Commun. 9, 154 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    Tamura, A

    R. Tamura, A. Ishikawa, S. Suzuki, T. Kotajima, Y . Tanaka , T. Seki, N. Shibata, T. Y amada, T. Fujii, C.-W. Wang, M. Avdeev, K. Naw a, D. Okuyama, and T. J. Sato, Experimental Observation of Long -Range Magnetic Order in Icosahedral Quasicrystals, J. Am. Chem. S oc. 143, 19938 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Y amada, A four-dimensional model for the Ba-Ti-O dode cagonal quasicrystal, Acta Cryst

    T. Y amada, A four-dimensional model for the Ba-Ti-O dode cagonal quasicrystal, Acta Cryst. B 78, 247 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    A. P . Tsai, Discovery of stable icosahedral quasicrystals: progress in un- derstanding structure and properties, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 5352 (2013)

    2013

  22. [22]

    Bindi, P

    L. Bindi, P . J. Steinhardt, N. Y ao, and P . J. Lu, Natural Qu asicrystals, Science 324, 1306 (2009)

    2009

  23. [23]

    Bindi, P

    L. Bindi, P . J. Steinhardt, N. Y ao, and P . J. Lu, Icosahedr ite, Al63Cu24Fe13, the first natural quasicrystal, Am. Mineral 96, 928 (2011)

    2011

  24. [24]

    Bindi, N

    L. Bindi, N. Y ao, C. Lin, L. S. Hollister, C. L. Andronicos , V . V . Distler, M. P . Eddy, A. Kostin, V . Kryachko, G. J. MacPherson, W. M. Ste in- hardt, M. Y udovskaya, and P . J. Steinhardt, Natural quasicr ystal with decagonal symmetry, Sci. Rep. 5, 9111 (2015)

    2015

  25. [25]

    Dotera, Quasicrystals in Soft Matter, Isr

    T. Dotera, Quasicrystals in Soft Matter, Isr. J. Chem. 51, 1197 (2011)

    2011

  26. [26]

    X. Zeng, G. Unger, Y . Liu, V . Percec, A. E. Dulcey, and J. K. Hobbs, Supramolecular dendritic liquid quasicrystals, Nature 428, 157 (2004)

    2004

  27. [27]

    Hayashida, T

    K. Hayashida, T. Dotera, A. Takano, and Y . Matsushita, Polymeric Qua- sicrystal: Mesoscopic Quasicrystalline Tiling in ABC Star Polymers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 195502 (2007)

    2007

  28. [28]

    S. J. Ahn, P . Moon, T.-H. Kim, H.-W. Kim, H.-C. Shin, E. H. Kim, H. W. Cha, S.-J. Kahng, P . Kim, M. Koshino, Y .-W. Son, C.-W. Y ang, and J. R. Ahn, Dirac electrons in a dodecagonal graphene quasicrysta l, Science 9 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. FULL PAPERS 361, 782 (2018)

    2018

  29. [29]

    P . Moon, M. Koshino, and Y .-W. Son, Quasicrystalline electronic states in 30 ◦ rotated twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 99, 165430 (2019)

    2019

  30. [30]

    Takesaki, K

    Y . Takesaki, K. Kawahara, H. Hibino, S. Okada, M. Tsuji, a nd H. Ago, Highly Uniform Bilayer Graphene on Epitaxial Cu-Ni(111) Al loy, Chem. Mater. 28, 4583 (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    W. Y ao, E. Wang, C. Bao, Y . Zhang, K. Zhang, K. Bao, C. K. Cha n, C. Chen, J. Avila, M. C. Asensio, J. Zhu, and S. Zhou, Quasicrystalline 30◦ twisted bilayer graphene as an incommensurate superlattice with strong interlayer coupling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6928 (2018)

    2018

  32. [32]

    Pezzini, V

    S. Pezzini, V . Miseikis, G. Piccinini, S. Forti, S. Pace, R. Engelke, F. Rossella, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P . Kim, and C. Colett i, 30 ◦- Twisted Bilayer Graphene Quasicrystals from Chemical V apor Deposi- tion, Nano Lett. 20, 3313 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Guidoni, C

    L. Guidoni, C. Trich´ e, P . V erkerk, and G. Grynberg, Quasiperiodic Op- tical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3363 (1997)

    1997

  34. [34]

    Viebahn, M

    K. Viebahn, M. Sbroscia, E. Carter, J.-C. Y u, and U. Schne ider, Matter- Wave Diffraction from a Quasicrystalline Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev . Lett. 122, 110404 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    Sbroscia, K

    M. Sbroscia, K. Viebahn, E. Carter, J.-C. Y u, A. Gaunt, an d U. Schnei- der, Observing Localization in a 2D Quasicrystalline Optic al Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 200604 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Sanchez-Palencia and L

    L. Sanchez-Palencia and L. Santos, Bose-Einstein conde nsates in opti- cal quasicrystal lattices, Phys. Rev. A 72, 053607 (2005)

    2005

  37. [37]

    Jagannathan and M

    A. Jagannathan and M. Duneau, An eightfold optical quasi crystal with cold atoms, Europhys. Lett. 104, 66003 (2013)

    2013

  38. [38]

    Jagannathan and M

    A. Jagannathan and M. Duneau, The eight-fold way for opti cal qua- sicrystals, Eur. Phys. J. B 87, 149 (2014)

    2014

  39. [39]

    J.-C. Y u, S. Bhave, L. Reeve, B. Song, and U. Schneider, Ob serving the two-dimensional Bose glass in an optical quasicrystal, Nat ure 633, 338 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultra- cold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  41. [41]

    Kohmoto and B

    M. Kohmoto and B. Sutherland, Electronic States on a Penr ose Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2740 (1986)

    1986

  42. [42]

    M. Arai, T. Tokihiro, T. Fujiwara, and M. Kohmoto, Strict ly localized states on a two-dimensional Penrose lattice, Phys. Rev. B 38, 1621 (1988)

    1988

  43. [43]

    Mirzhalilov and M

    M. Mirzhalilov and M. ¨O. Oktel, Perpendicular space accounting of lo- calized states in a quasicrystal, Phys. Rev. B 102, 064213 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    M. ¨O. Oktel, Strictly localized states in the octagonal Ammann-Beenker quasicrystal, Phys. Rev. B 104, 014204 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Akif Keskiner and M

    M. Akif Keskiner and M. ¨O. Oktel, Strictly localized states on the So- colar dodecagonal lattice, Phys. Rev. B 106, 064207 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    Koga and H

    A. Koga and H. Tsunetsugu, Antiferromagnetic order in th e Hubbard model on the Penrose lattice, Phys. Rev. B 96, 214402 (2017)

    2017

  47. [47]

    Koga, Superlattice structure in the antiferromagnet ically ordered state in the Hubbard model on the Ammann-Beenker tiling, Phy s

    A. Koga, Superlattice structure in the antiferromagnet ically ordered state in the Hubbard model on the Ammann-Beenker tiling, Phy s. Rev. B 102, 115125 (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    Koga, Antiferromagnetic Ordered State in the Half-Fi lled Hub- bard Model on the Socolar Dodecagonal Tiling, Mater

    A. Koga, Antiferromagnetic Ordered State in the Half-Fi lled Hub- bard Model on the Socolar Dodecagonal Tiling, Mater. Trans. 62, 360 (2021)

    2021

  49. [49]

    Johnstone, P

    D. Johnstone, P . ¨Ohberg, and C. W. Duncan, Mean-field phases of an ultracold gas in a quasicrystalline potential, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053609 (2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    Ghadimi, T

    R. Ghadimi, T. Sugimoto, and T. Tohyama, Mean-field study of the Bose-Hubbard model in the Penrose lattice, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224201 (2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    M. Hori, T. Sugimoto, Y . Hashizume, and T. Tohyama, Multi fractality and Hyperuniformity in Quasicrystalline Bose-Hubbard Mod els with and without Disorder, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 114005 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Wessel, A

    S. Wessel, A. Jagannathan, and S. Haas, Quantum Antiferr omagnetism in Quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 177205 (2003)

    2003

  53. [53]

    Wessel and I

    S. Wessel and I. Milat, Quantum fluctuations and excitati ons in antifer- romagnetic quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B 71, 104427 (2005)

    2005

  54. [54]

    Jagannathan, A

    A. Jagannathan, A. Szallas, S. Wessel, and M. Duneau, Pen rose quan- tum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 75, 212407 (2007)

    2007

  55. [55]

    Szallas and A

    A. Szallas and A. Jagannathan, Spin waves and local magne tizations on the Penrose tiling, Phys. Rev. B 77, 104427 (2008)

    2008

  56. [56]

    L.-M. Duan, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Controlling Spin E xchange Interactions of Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 090402 (2003)

    2003

  57. [57]

    Moriya, Theory of Light Scattering by Magnetic Crysta ls, J

    T. Moriya, Theory of Light Scattering by Magnetic Crysta ls, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 23, 490 (1967)

    1967

  58. [58]

    P . A. Fleury and R. Loudon, Scattering of Light by One- and Two- Magnon Excitations, Phys. Rev. 166, 514 (1968)

    1968

  59. [59]

    B. S. Shastry and B. I. Shraiman, Theory of Raman scatteri ng in Mott- Hubbard systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1068 (1990)

    1990

  60. [60]

    B. S. Shastry and B. I. Shraiman, Raman Scattering in Mott -Hubbard Systems, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 365 (1991)

    1991

  61. [61]

    R. J. Elliot and R. Loudon, The possible observation of el ectric Raman transitions in crystals, Phys. Lett. 3, 189 (1963)

    1963

  62. [62]

    A. F. Khater and M. A. Continentino, Theory of light scatt ering in disor- dered magnetic systems, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 15, 2993 (1982)

    1982

  63. [63]

    Koshizuka and K

    N. Koshizuka and K. Hayashi, Raman Scattering from Magno n Excita- tions in RFeO 3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 57, 4418 (1988)

    1988

  64. [64]

    Blumberg, P

    G. Blumberg, P . Abbamonte, M. V . Klien, W. C. Lee, D. M. Gin sberg, L. L. Miller, and A. Zibold, Resonant two-magnon Raman scatt ering in cuprate antiferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 53, R11930(R) (1996)

    1996

  65. [65]

    Inoue and S

    T. Inoue and S. Y amamoto, Optical Observation of Quasipe riodic Heisenberg Antiferromagnets in Two Dimensions, Phys. Stat us Solidi B 257, 2000118 (2020)

    2020

  66. [66]

    Inoue and S

    T. Inoue and S. Y amamoto, Polarized Raman Response of Two - Dimensional Quasiperiodic Antiferromagnets: Configurati on- Interaction versus Green’s Function Approaches, J. Phys. S oc. Jpn. 91, 053701 (2022)

    2022

  67. [67]

    D. J. Lockwood, M. G. Cottam, V . C. Y . So, and R. S. Katiyar, Raman scattering from one-magnon excitations in FeF 2, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 17, 6009 (1984)

    1984

  68. [68]

    M. G. Cottam and D. J. Lockwood, One-magnon Raman scatter ing in a S = 5 2 antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 31, 641 (1985)

    1985

  69. [69]

    Gozar, B

    A. Gozar, B. S. Dennis, G. Blumberg, S. Komiya, and Y . Ando , Mag- netic Order in Lightly Doped La 2−xSrxCuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 027001 (2004)

    2004

  70. [70]

    M. B. Silva Neto and L. Benfatto, One-magnon Raman scatte ring in La2CuO4: The origin of the field-induced mode, Phys. Rev. B 72, 140401(R) (2005)

    2005

  71. [71]

    Benfatto, M

    L. Benfatto, M. B. Silva Neto, A. Gozar, B. S. Dennis, G. Bl umberg, L. L. Miller, S. Komiya, and Y . Ando, Field dependence of the mag netic spectrum in anisotropic and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya antife rromagnets. II. Raman spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 74, 024416 (2006)

    2006

  72. [72]

    Y .-J. Lin, K. Jim´ enez-Garc´ ıa, and I. B. Spielman, Spin -orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates, Nature 471, 83 (2011)

    2011

  73. [73]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and P . ¨Ohberg, Colloquium: Ar- tificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1523 (2011)

    2011

  74. [74]

    L. W. Cheuk, A. T. Sommer, Z. Hadzibabic, T. Y efsah, W. S. B akr, and M. W. Zwierlein, Spin-Injection Spectroscopy of a Spin-Orb it Coupled Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 095302 (2012)

    2012

  75. [75]

    F. C. Aguilar, A. F. Ho, and J. Ruostekoski, Optical Signa tures of An- tiferromagnetic Ordering of Fermionic Atoms in an Optical L attice, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031036 (2014)

    2014

  76. [76]

    R. A. Hart, P . M. Duarte, T.-L. Y ang, X. Liu, T. Paiva, E. Khatami, R. T. Scalettar, N. Trivedi, D. A. Huse, and R. G. Hulet, Observati on of anti- ferromagnetic correlations in the Hubbard model with ultra cold atoms, Nature 519, 211 (2015)

    2015

  77. [77]

    Bernier, T.-L

    J.-S. Bernier, T.-L. Dao, C. Kollath, A. Georges, and P . S . Cornaglia, Thermometry and signatures of strong correlations from Ram an spec- troscopy of fermionic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 81, 063618 (2010)

    2010

  78. [78]

    Penrose, The role of aesthetics in pure and applied mat hematical research, Bull

    R. Penrose, The role of aesthetics in pure and applied mat hematical research, Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. 10, 266 (1974)

    1974

  79. [79]

    N. G. de Bruijn, Algebraic theory of Penrose’s non-perio dic tiling of the plane. I, Indag. Math. Proc. Ser. A 84, 39 (1981)

    1981

  80. [80]

    N. G. de Bruijn, Algebraic theory of Penrose’s non-perio dic tiling of the plane. II, Indag. Math. Proc. Ser. A 84, 53 (1981)

    1981

Showing first 80 references.